1

ProposedChangestoColumbiasGenderBasedMisconductPolicyNoRedTape

1. Change the definition of consent to adopt a more comprehensive and practical

standard, and incorporate additional scenarios and examples of sexual violence in order to reflect the full range of experiences that fall into the category of sexual violence.

2. Reorganize the policy, placing definitions first, with the definition of consent first in that category. Follow the definitions section with policy and scenarios. This will help establish a common vocabulary and set of behavioral expectations before outlining the possible consequences of violating those expectations. Under Resources,incorporatetheadditionalresourceswevelisted.

3. Practicemeaningfultransparencyandaccountability.4. Ensure adequate training of officers under the Office of GenderBased Misconduct

to improve student experiences with reporting and reflect the seriousness of sexual anddomesticviolenceonthiscampus.

5. Give students involved in adjudication processes adequate information and decisionmaking power regarding the investigative report, personnel involved in theircase,andlegal/emotionalsupportoptions.

6. Allow additional allegations against the same respondent (including past and concurrentlyopenallegations)asevidenceduringauniversityhearing.

7. Create a formal accommodations and support system for complainants through case management, and implement effective nocontact directives which require perpetratorsofviolencetoleavecampusspacesoreventsifthesurvivorispresent.

8. Treat cases of sexual and domestic violence with appropriately severe sanctions, including expulsion when called for by the complainant, and educational measures for all students found responsible. If respondents found responsible return to campus, they must be prohibited from holding positions of power, including but not limited to resident advisors, teaching assistants, and orientation leaders, and case management.

______________________________________________________________________

2

1. Changethedefinitionofconsentprovidedonpage20oftheOfficeofGenderBased

Misconductspolicytoadopttheonewehaveprovided,andincorporateadditionalscenariosandexamplesofsexualviolenceinordertoreflectthefullrangeofexperiencesthatfallintothecategoryofsexualviolence.1.1. Defineconsentas:Affirmative,conscious,enthusiastic,continuous,revocable,sober,

freelygivenandvoluntaryagreementtoengageinsexualactivity.1.1.1. Itistheresponsibilityofeachpersoninvolvedinsexualactivitytoensurethat

theyhavetheaffirmativeconsentoftheother(s)toengageinsaidsexualactivity.1.1.2. Lackofprotestorresistancedoesnotmeanconsent.Silencedoesnotmean

consent.1.1.3. Consentmustbeongoingthroughoutasexualactivityandcanberevokedatany

time.1.1.4. Consenttooneformofsexualactivitydoesnotimplyconsenttootherformsof

sexualactivity.1.1.5. Theexistenceofadatingrelationshiporpriorsexualhistorybetweenthepersons

involvedshouldneverbeanassumedindicatorofconsent.1.1.6. Consentcannotbeprocuredbytheuseofcoercion,manipulation,physicalforce,

compulsion,threats,orintimidatingbehavior.1.1.7. Consenttoengageinsexualactivitywithonepersondoesnotimplyconsentto

engageinsexualactivitywithanother.1.1.8. Someoneintoxicatedbydrugsoralcohol,unconscious,disabled,orotherwise

madehelplessandthereforeincapableofunderstandingthefact,nature,orextentofthesexualactivitycannotconsent.Concerninginvolvementofdrugsoralcohol:

1.1.8.1. Theuseofalcoholordrugsdoesnotjustifyorexcusebehaviorthatconstitutesgenderbasedmisconduct.

1.1.8.2. Theuseofalcoholorotherdrugsnevermakessomeoneatfaultforexperiencinggenderbasedmisconduct.Thoughalcoholconsumptionandsexualassaultoftenoccurtogether,alcoholisnotthecauseofsexualassault.Alcoholisusedasatoolofcoercionandcamouflagetoperpetuatesexualassault.

1.2. ThecurrentdefinitionofGenderBasedHarassmentstatesthatharassmentisunacceptablewhenitunreasonablyinterfereswithsomeoneslife.Anyharassmentthatinterfereswithsomeonesphysical,mental,oremotionalwellbeingisunreasonable.Thepolicysdefinitionmustberevisedtoreflectthis.

1.3. Addadditionalscenarios,including:1.3.1. Oneexplicitlyqueerscenario.

3

1.3.2. OneinvolvingDomesticorDatingViolenceand/orsexualcoercioninthecontextofanintimaterelationship.

1.3.3. Oneshowingabreachofaffirmativeconsent,demonstratingthatsilencedoesnotmeanyes.

1.4. Includestalkingasanexampleofsexualharassment.2. Reorganizethepolicy,placingdefinitionsfirst,withthedefinitionofconsentfirstinthat

category.Followthedefinitionssectionwithpolicyandscenarios.Thiswillhelpestablishacommonvocabularyandsetofbehavioralexpectationsbeforeoutliningthepossibleconsequencesofviolatingthoseexpectations.UnderResources,incorporatetheadditionalresourceswevelisted.2.1. ExplicitlystatetheresourcesavailableatSt.Lukes,includingtrainedadvocates,rape

kits,STItestingandemergencycontraception,andsupportgroups.2.2. Includethebusinesshoursofeachonandoffcampusresource.2.3. UnderResourcesforStudentsandandintheConfidentialityProtectionsand

ReportingObligationschart,clarifytheconfidentialityclause.Makeclearthatasurvivorandtheirsupporterscanseeksupportfromfriends,family,andothersurvivors(includingothercurrentstudents)duringthecourseoftheadjudicationprocesswithoutfearofdiscipline.Thisisimportanttoclarify,becauseinthepast,studentshavebeenrestrictedfromdiscussingtheirexperienceswithanyothercurrentstudentsduringthedisciplinaryproceedings.Somehaveevenbeenformallysanctionedfordoingso.

3. Practicemeaningfultransparencyandaccountability.

3.1. Providethestudentbodywithtimelywarningsregardingreportedactsofoncampussexualviolence.Studentshavearighttoknowwhensuchincidentstakeplace,asrespondentsposeanongoingthreattothecommunitywhiletheyremainoncampusduringtheiradjudicationandbeyond.Givenratesofserialperpetrationandviolencebetweenacquaintancesandintimatepartners,theadministrationandcomplainantsawarenessoftheincidentandtheperpetratorsidentityinnowayensuresthesafetyofstudents.ThesealertsaremandatedbytheJeanneCleryAct,whichstatesthatuniversitiesshallmaketimelyreportstothecampuscommunityoncrimesconsideredtobeathreattootherstudentsandemployeessuchreportsshallbeprovidedtostudentsandemployeesinamannerthatistimelyandthatwillaidinthepreventionofsimilaroccurrences(20U.S.C.1092(f)(3))Thealertsarealreadysentoutforreportedoffcampusassaults,butnotoncampuscases.Theyshouldnotcontainidentifyinginformationregardingthecomplainant.

3.2. InstituteamandatoryandcomprehensivereviewoftheGenderBasedMisconductPolicyeverytwoyearswhichdirectlysolicitsandintegratestheconcernsofstudentsandsurvivorsoncampus.

3.3. Createanonlineevaluationformforeverystudentwhomakesaformalreport.EverycomplainantandrespondentinagenderbasedmisconductcasemustfillthisformoutaftertheircasewiththeOfficeofGenderBasedMisconductiscompleted,andtheresultsoftheevaluationmustbesenttoPACSA(notjustaselectgroupofadministrators.

4

3.4. Upholdstudentsrighttofullyprotectedfinancialaidpackagesandfullreimbursementforanylosttuitionshouldtheyneedtowithdrawortakeatemporaryleaveofabsencebecauseoftheirexperiencesofsexualordomesticviolence,asmandatedbyfederalguidance.

3.5. TheOGBMmustmakethefollowinginformationaccessibletorespondentsandcomplainants:

3.5.1. Thenamesandtraining/qualificationsofallinvestigators,hearingpanelists,casemanagers,sanctioningandappealsofficers,volunteerattorneys,andanyotherpersonsofinfluencewithintheircasecase.StudentsareentitledtoknowhoweachofthesepeoplehasbeentrainedbytheOfficeofGenderBasedMisconduct.Currently,studentshavenoideawhoisinvolvedintheircasesandmanyhavehaddisturbinginteractionswithinvestigators,hearingpanelists,sanctioningandappealsofficers,andotherUniversityrepresentativesthatrevealanunacceptablelackoftrainingandsensitivity.

3.5.2. Namesofwitnessesinthecase.Studentsmustreceiveawrittenexplanationfrominvestigatorsiftheyareunableorunwillingtocontactcertainwitnessesbeforethehearing.

3.5.3. Theinvestigatorsassessmentsofcredibilityforeachpartyinacase.Giventhehighlysubjectivenatureoftheinvestigatorsevaluationofcredibility,andtheinfluenceithasoverthepanelsultimatedecision,studentsshouldhavearighttomorethanoneinvestigatorcontributingtotheirevaluationofcredibilityandtherighttochallengethatevaluation.

3.5.4. Resolutionwithin60daysoftheprocess.Strictparametersdictatingthelegitimacyofdelaysmustbecreatedinordertoprotectthisright.TheOfficeofGenderbasedMisconductmustestablishsomemechanismbywhichstudentscanreportandchallengeviolationsofthisright.Manysurvivorshavewatchedtheircasesstretchonformonthswithnoresolutiondespitethepolicysgoalof60dayhearings,andthishasaddedhoursofadditionalanxietyandtraumaforstudentsnavigatingtheprocess.Forexample,onesurvivorwasforcedtoremaininNYCoverthesummerinsteadofreturninghomebecausehercasestretchedonfor5months.

4. EnsureadequatetrainingofofficersundertheOfficeofGenderBasedMisconductto

ensureeffectiveness,sensitivity,andreflecttheseriousnessofsexualanddomesticviolenceonthiscampus.4.1. Removedeansfromdecisionmakingrolesassanctioningandappealsofficers.

4.1.1. Deanshavenoexpertiseindynamicsofsexualordatingviolencepreventionorresponse,andarecompletelyunqualifiedtomakedecisionsaboutsanctioningandappealsinthesecases.Ittakesyearsofprofessionalizedtrainingnot2hourstounderstandthecomplexitiesofgenderbasedviolenceanditsimpacts.Furthermore,theircompetingresponsibilitiesforfundraising,alumnirelations,studentactivities,andthepublicimageoftheschoolcreateaconflictofinterestthatthemostwellintentionedadministratorwouldstrugglewith.Bothvictims

5

andaccusedstudentsdeservetohavedecisionsofthisseriousnessmadecompetentandimpartialindividuals.

4.1.2. Deanshavedemonstratedthestructuralimpossibilityofthecurrentsystembyregularlyhandingdown1and2semestersuspensionsforstudentsfoundresponsibleforrape,despitetheirrepeatedpromisestorespondwithappropriategravity.Thisisnotaboutanegativejudgmentofthedeanscharacterbutabouttheirstructuralinabilitytobeunbiasedandtheirlackofexpertiseintheareaofrespondingtoandpreventingsexualviolence.

5. Givestudentsinvolvedinadjudicationprocessesadequateinformationanddecisionmaking

powerregardingtheentireprocessincludingtheinvestigativereport,personnelinvolvedintheircase,andlegal/emotionalsupport.5.1. TheOfficeofGenderBasedMisconducthastheobligationtoensurethatall

complainantsandrespondentsrightsaremadeclearinwritingfromthebeginningoftheprocessandupheldthroughout.Theserightsincludetherightto:

5.1.1. Beinformedastowhospecificallymayreviewtheirreport/statementsineachstepoftheadjudicationprocessasperthepolicy.

5.1.2. Haveaclearprocedurethroughwhichtheycanmakechangestotheinvestigativereport,andwhichdetailswhetherchangeswillbemadetothecontentofthereportoraddedontotheendasanaddendum.

5.1.3. Providequestionsforwitnessestobeaskedduringthehearing.5.1.4. Refrainfrommakingselfincriminatingstatementsinaccordancewiththeir5th

Amendmentrights.5.1.5. Whenastudentisfoundresponsible,thesurvivorshouldbegiventhe

opportunitytomakeanimpactstatementduringthepointoftheadjudicationprocesswhenthedecisionmakerisdeliberatingonappropriatesanctions,toexplainwhatsanctionstheyfeelwouldbestensuretheirmentalwellbeingandpreventcontinuedharassment,violence,ortrauma.

5.1.6. ReviewtheirinvestigativereportoutsidetheOfficeofGenderBasedMisconducttoensuretheyhavesufficienttimetopreparetheirstatementswithlegalcounselasappropriate.Currently,complainantsandrespondentsareonlysometimesprovidedwithacopyoftheinvestigativereportbutothertimesareonlyallowedtoreviewitinsidetheoffice.Usingtheuniversityslettersendingprocessviaunisignin,forthedurationofthecase,wouldbeanaptwaytoaccomplishthis.

5.1.7. Bringanattorneyorlegaladvisorinadditiontoapersonalsupportpersonduringthehearingprocess.Survivorshaveexpressedfrustrationthattheyhavetochoosebetweenprofessionallegalsupportandemotionalsupport.

5.2. Restorativeand/ortransformativejusticeprocessesshouldbemadeavailablewhenbothpartiesconsenttoparticipate.

5.2.1. Columbiamustpartnerwithanorganizationspecializinginrestorativeand/ortransformativejusticedevelopthisoption,andshouldincludeathoroughdescriptionoftheavailablerestorativeand/ortransformativejusticeprocessesin

6

thepolicyandtheexplanationofrightsdistributedatthebeginningoftheprocess.

5.3. Studentswhoobstructjusticethroughouttheinvestigationand/oradjudicationprocessesmustfacepunitivetreatment.Complainantsandrespondentsshouldbeprovidedwithanoptiontofileacomplaintofobstructionofjusticeiftheyfeeltheotherpartyintheircasehasengagedinsuchbehavior,andthisshouldbeconsideredinthehearing,sanctioning,andappealsdecisions.Forexample,asurvivorshouldhavebeenabletoreportheraccusedrapistwhoattemptedtobribeamutualfriendtoactasafavorablewitness.

5.3.1. Obstructionofjusticeincludes(butisnotlimitedto)themanipulationanddestructionofevidenceaswellastheintentionaldelayingofproceduresthroughouttheadjudicationprocess,and,obviously,falsifyingdetailsintestimony.

5.4. Inappealsproceedings:5.4.1.1. TheUniversityshouldnotrequirecomplainantsandrespondentsto

reappearbeforethehearingpanelortheinvestigativeofficersduringtheappealsprocess.However,complainantsandrespondentsshouldhavearighttoreappearbeforethehearingpanelortheinvestigativeofficersiftheysochoose.Thiswillhelpensurethatbothsidesofanycaseareaccuratelyandequitablyportrayedinanyappealsproceedings.

5.4.1.2. IftheAppealsOfficerdecidestoconveneanewhearingpanelfortheappeal,ratherthanreconveningtheoriginalpanel,theymustprovideanexplanationinwritingforwhythisdecisionswasmade.Eitherpartyshouldhavetherighttochallengethisdecisioniftheyfeelitwasmadeunfairly.

5.4.1.3. Deansshouldnotbegivenjurisdictionovertheappealsprocess.Giventhatanappealisthefinalandmostseriouschallengeastudentcanmakeinthisprocess,thepersontaskedwithdeterminingthevalidityoftheseappealsshouldbeexceptionallywellqualified,clearlyimpartial,andhaverealprofessionalexpertiseingenderbasedmisconductissues.Forexample,DeanValentinitaughtChemistrybeforemovinguptheColumbiahierarchythroughvariousadministrativeroles.Thisdoesnotqualifyhimtobethefinalarbiterinseriouscasesofgenderbasedviolence.Deanslacktheprofessionalexpertisetoholdarolethatgivesthemtheauthoritytounilaterallydecidethesecases.Further,theircompetingresponsibilitiesasDeansmaymaycomplicatetheirabilitytoserveasimpartialdecisionmakersinthisrole.Inatleast5casesinthelastyear,survivorshavefeltthatDeansmadeunfair,biased,oruninformeddecisionsintheappealprocessthatnegativelyaffectedtheoutcomeoftheircaseandcausedthemextremedistress.

6. Allowallallegationsagainstthesamerespondent(includingpastandconcurrentlyopen

allegations)asevidenceduringauniversityhearing.

7

6.1. Allformalreportsofviolenceorgenderbasedmisconductmadeagainstagivenrespondent,andallwitnesstestimonyregardingtherespondentengaginginviolenceorgenderbasedmisconductthathasnotresultedinaformalreport,shouldbeconsideredinthehearing,sanctioning,andappealsprocesses.Suchinformationiscrucialevidencetoindicateapotentialpatternofbehavior.Itisstandardprocedureinthecriminaljusticesystemtoallowopenpolicereportstobeconsidered,regardlessofwhetherthereporthasresultedinaconviction.TheUniversityhasallowedserialperpetratorstoremainoncampusbyrefusingtoconsidercasesopenconcurrentlyagainstthesamerespondent.

6.1.1. Thismustapplytoanyconcurrentcasesagainstthesamerespondent,andincludeevidenceofarespondentshistoryofviolentactsbeyondgenderbasedmisconductincluding,butnotlimitedto,criminalanduniversitydisciplinaryrecords.

6.1.2. Thishasbeenamajorissueforsurvivorswhoattempttoreportserialperpetratorsespeciallygiventhetypicallengthoftheseinvestigationsandcases,itsimperativethatopencasescanbeconsideredconcurrentlyinordertoidentifyserialperpetratorsandtreatrepeatoffenderswithappropriateseverity.

7. Createaformalaccommodationsandsupportsystemforcomplainantsthroughcase

management.7.1. TheUniversitymuststipulateinnocontactdirectivesthatifthecomplainantand

respondentobserveeachotherinapublicplace,itistheresponsibilityoftherespondenttoleavetheareaimmediatelyandwithoutengagingwiththecomplainant.ThisshouldapplytoallpublicspacesandanyeventssponsoredbytheUniversityoranyUniversityprograms,offices,departments,teams,orrecognizedstudentgroups.

7.2. TheOGBMmustimplementaformalaccommodationsrequestsystemthroughwhichsurvivorsareabletorequestinterimmeasuresandaccommodations.Currently,survivorscanrequestthesemeasuresfromtheircasesmanagersbutthesecanberejectedorignoredwithnoformalexplanation.Survivorsareentitledtothesemeasuresbylawyetmanysurvivorshavehadtheserequestsdeniedwithoutexplanation.Forexample,onesurvivorwasnotpermittedtowithdrawfromaclassthoughtheysufferedseverepanicattacksbecauseoftheirPTSDandwerenotabletoparticipatefully.Anothersurvivorrequestedthatherabuserbeblockedfromaccessingherdorm,butwastoldtheOGBMwouldnotrestricthisaccessbecauseheshouldbeabletoseehisfriends.

7.2.1. ManystudentsurvivorsdonotwanttobeginthetraumaticprocessoffilingaformalcomplaintwiththeUniversity,butmaystillneedhousingandacademicaccommodations.TheUniversitymustclearlyandexplicitlycreateaprocessforrequestingaccommodationswithoutautomaticallystartingaformaladjudicationprocess.

7.2.2. Thisformalrequestssystemmustexplicitlyofferandprovidetheabilitytorequestposthearingaccommodations(suchasacademicorhousingchanges)eveniftherespondentisnotfoundresponsible.

7.2.3. Itmustincludeaspecifictimeframewithinwhicheachrequestmustbeassessedandrespondedto.

8

7.2.4. Itmustrequireawrittenexplanationregardingtheapprovalordenialofanyrequest.

7.3. TheUniversitymustestablishawaytoseriouslyenforceaccessrestrictions,asthecurrentprocedureisineffectiveandleavesstudentsunsafe.Asthecurrentpolicyallows,arespondentorperpetratormayhavetheirswipeaccesstoabuildingrevokedhowever,anotherpersoncanstillsignthatpersonintotheverylocationfromwhichthatpersonisprohibitedfromentering.ItisimperativethattheOGBMcollaboratewithHousingandPublicSafetytocreateaviableprotocolinresidencehallsthatmoreeffectivelypreventstheserestrictionsfrombeingbroken.Becauseourcurrentsigninsystemfailstopreventthis,survivorshavetoliveinconstantanxietythatthepersonwhoassaulted,abused,orstalkedthemmightentertheirbuildingatanytime,whichisunsafeandunacceptable.

7.3.1. Inadditiontoswipeaccessbeingrevoked,thesystemshouldpreventrespondents/perpetratorsfromgettingsignedinbyotherstudents.Violationsofthisshouldbetreatedwithseriousdisciplinaryactionforboththestudentwhoviolatestheorder,andanyotherstudentwhoaidsthestudentingainingaccesstoaprohibitedbuilding.

7.4. TheOGBMshouldcreateaprotocolforasituationinwhicharespondentandcomplainantwanttotakethesameclass,whethertherespondentisfoundresponsibleornot.Thisshouldbeimplementedproactivelyratherthanwaitingforsurvivorstoattendclassandrealizetheyarebothenrolled,andshouldcontinueuntilthecomplainantgraduates.

7.4.1. AsperguidelinesfromtheDepartmentofEducationonTitleIXimplementation,theburdenofanyaccommodationsorinterimmeasuresshouldnotfallonthesurvivororcomplainant(i.e.ifthetwopartiesshareaclass,therespondentshouldberemovedfromtheclassratherthanthesurvivor).

7.5. AsperguidelinesfromtheDepartmentofEducationonTitleIXimplementation,anycostsincurredbythecomplainantinsecuringaccommodationsmustbecoveredbytheUniversity,andthisshouldbeguaranteedinthepolicy.Forexample,ifastudentsurvivorcannotremainintheirdormforsafetyreasons,theschoolmusteitherprovidesuitablehousingoncampusforfree,includingcoveringanyadditionalcostsifastudentismovedintoamoreexpensivedorm,orcovertheexpensesrelatedtorentingahotelroom.AstudentwhoneedssupplementaltutoringbecausetheirPTSDpreventedthemfromfocusinginclassshouldbeprovidedtutoringatnocost.Astudentshouldnotbechargedforhavingexperiencedgenderbasedviolence.

7.6. ComplainantsandRespondentsmustbenotifiedinadvanceiftheOfficeofGenderBasedMisconductiscontactingacademic,athletic,andextracurriculardepartmentstoshareinformationregardingtheircase.

8. Treatcasesofsexualanddomesticviolencewithappropriatelyseveresanctions,including

expulsionwhencalledforbythecomplainant,educationalmeasures,andcasemanagementifrespondentsfoundresponsiblereturntocampus.8.1. Ifastudentisfoundresponsibleforcommittinggenderbasedviolenceandsanctioned

withsuspension,theminimumdurationforsuspensionshouldbetheremainderofthe

9

timethatthesurvivorwillbeastudentatthecollege.Thiswillensurethatsurvivorsareabletopursuetheireducationwithouthavingtoliveinconstantfearofseeingtheirrapistorabuser.AdditionalrequirementstosuspensionsmustincludemeaningfuleducationalprogrammingandmandatoryfollowupwithCaseManagersuponthesuspendedstudentsreturntocampus.

8.1.1. Ifstudentsfoundresponsibleofgenderbasedmisconductareallowedbackoncampustheymustbeprohibitedfromleadershiproleswheretheywouldhavepoweroverotherstudents,including,butlimitedto,residentadvisors,teachingassistantsandorientationleaders.Thereiscurrentlynopolicyprohibitingthisandthatisunacceptable.Currently,theUniversityallowsthosefoundresponsibleofGenderBasedMisconducttoholdleadershippositionsoncampusasResidentAdvisors,TeachingAssistants,andOrientationLeaders.Thisisunacceptable.Allowingpeoplefoundresponsibleofgenderbasedmisconducttosupervisethephysical,emotional,andacademicwellbeingofstudentsjeopardizesstudentsafety.Thisisespeciallyrelevantinthecaseoffirstyears,whoarethemostvulnerabletosexualviolenceandwholookuptoRAsandTAsforguidance.Thisisasimplematterofstudentsafety,asthepositionsofRAandTAputperpetratorsinapositionwheretheyholdpowerandinfluenceoveryoungerandmorevulnerablestudentsandcaneasilyabusethistrust.GiventhatRAs,TAs,andorientationleaderstendtohavethemostoneononecontactwithfirstyears,whoarealreadystatisticallythemostvulnerabletosexualassaultoncampus,itisunsafeforpeoplefoundresponsibleofGenderBasedMisconducttoholdthesepositions.

8.2. Ifastudentisfoundresponsibleforcommittingsexualassault,theavailablesanctionsshallbeeitherexpulsionorimmediatesuspension.

8.3. Priortoimposinganysanction,aSanctioningOfficerwillconsultwiththeGenderBasedMisconductOfficeaboutsanctionsimposedinsimilarcases.(OGBMPolicy,16)

8.3.1. GiventheegregiouslyinappropriateandweaknatureofprevioussanctionsimposedbytheUniversity,theUniversityshouldnotimposesanctionsbasedontheprecedentestablishedbysimilarcases.Onesemestersuspensionsarenotanappropriatelyseveresanctionforsexualassaultordatingviolence.Instead,sanctionsshouldreflectanapproachwhichacknowledgesthegravesignificanceofsuchviolence.Initsresponsetoperpetrators,theUniversityshouldrecognizethatmeasuressuchascomprehensivereeducationand/orexpulsionarenecessarytopreventperpetratorsfromposingcontinuedthreatstothecampuscommunityandsocietyatlarge.

8.4. TheUniversitywillrequireanystudentdeterminedtoberesponsibleforaviolationofthePolicytoreceiveappropriateeducationand/ortrainingrelatedtothegenderbasedmisconductviolationatissue.(OGBMPolicy,17)

8.4.1. Allperpetratorsshouldreceiveathorough,meaningful,andevidencebasededucationsurroundingtheperpetrationofgenderbasedmisconducttohelppreventfutureviolence.However,thecurrenteducationalrequirementsare

10

inadequateinaddressingtheseverityofgenderbasedmisconduct.Currently,Columbiaassignsreflectiveessaysasapunishmentforsexualassaultinsomecases.Essaysarenotameaningfulmethodofeducationinthiscontext.Appropriateeducationalprogramsmustbecomprehensive,administeredbytrainedprofessionalswithexperienceinsexualviolenceprevention,andinformedbyavailableresearchonbestpracticesforpreventionprogramming.

8.4.1.1. Generalinformationregardingthecontentandstructureofthesereeducationoptionsshouldbeclearlyexplainedandpubliclyavailable.

8.4.1.2. Theadministratorsordepartmentsresponsibleforoverseeingtheeducationandtrainingcomponentofsanctioningshouldbeidentifiedinthepolicy.

8.4.1.3. TheUniversitymustreviseitsinterpretationoftheresponsibleemployeeclauseofTitleIX,andceaserequiringprofessorsandRAstobemandatoryreportersofsexualanddomesticviolence.Bycurrentlyembracingamaximalinterpretationofthisclause,theuniversityfurtheralienatessurvivorsbydeprivingthemofsupportfromtheirpeersandtrustedadultsintheirlives.Additionally,ifstudentsneedtorequestaccommodationsfromprofessorsbecausetheyareexperiencingtrauma,theyshouldbeabletodosowithouthavingtheirexperiencesreportedtoOGBM.

8.5. Communityserviceisnotasufficientsanctionforperpetratorsofsexualviolence,thoughitcanbeanappropriateandhelpfulcomponentofsanctionswhencombinedwithmorerigorousrequirements.

8.6. Publishalistofsanctioningofficersandappealsofficersandthetrainingtheyhavereceived.

8.7. Toensuretransparentandlegitimatesanctioningprocesses,theOfficemustincludeinitsannualpublicationanaggregate,anonymizedreportofthesanctionsimposedonstudentsfoundresponsibleforcommittinggenderbasedviolenceoncampus.Thisshouldincludeallthecaseswhichwereconcludedinthegivenacademicyear(notsimplyallthecaseswhichwerereportedinthatyear).ThisapproachisalreadyfollowedbypeerinstitutionslikeYaleandtheUniversityofConnecticut.

8.8. Therespondentsconductduringthedisciplinaryprocess.(OGBMPolicy,7)8.8.1. Otherthanattemptsmadebytherespondenttoobstructjustice,conductofthe

respondentduringthedisciplinaryprocessshouldnotinfluencesanctioning.Astudentcanbewellmanneredduringaninvestigationprocessandstillhavecommittedanactofseriousviolence.