97
ANALYSIS OF CRUISE MISSILE VULNERABILITY WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESS By Thomas M. Wilk Project Report submitted to the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Systems Engineering APPROVED: a. OBrn tO Benjamin S. Blanchard Jr., Chairman NL ee tL Donald R. Drew Géorge A. Williams April, 1996 Blacksburg, Virginia Key Words: Systems Engineering, Vulnerability, Lethality, Cruise Missiles

NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

ANALYSIS OF CRUISE MISSILE VULNERABILITY WITHIN THE CONTEXT

OF THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESS

By

Thomas M. Wilk

Project Report submitted to the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in

partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Science

in

Systems Engineering

APPROVED:

a. O Brn tO Benjamin S. Blanchard Jr., Chairman

NL ee tL

Donald R. Drew Géorge A. Williams

April, 1996

Blacksburg, Virginia

Key Words: Systems Engineering, Vulnerability, Lethality, Cruise Missiles

Page 2: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

C,

Page 3: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

ANALYSIS OF CRUISE MISSILE VULNERABILITY WITHIN THE CONTEXT

OF THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESS

By

Thomas M. Wilk

Committee Chairman: Benjamin S. Blanchard Jr. Systems Engineering

(ABSTRACT)

Anti-shipping cruise missiles are likely to pose a serious threat to U.S. Naval forces in

any future conflict. In order to adequately defend their assets, the U.S. Navy needs to

develop the means to defeat these systems. To do this, it needs to define and exploit

any vulnerabilities associated with them.

The Systems Engineering Process is used to define the vulnerability of a generic

cruise missile system. Initially, the requirement for a vulnerability analysis is

established. The functions associated with cruise missile systems are presented, to a

level in which components are identified. Existing systems are then compared,

providing a means in which a "typical" system can be identified. The failure modes

for this system are then defined.

Finally, a computer model of the missile is constructed and analyzed, leading to

numeric values for the measures of vulnerability to fragmenting warheads.

Page 4: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Page ADStraCt ooo ceccceececececceccececssveccocecsseacsevacseceesecenssavsecacsesesecsessseresssaerseeseesereneee: ii

List Of Figures 200000000... oo cocccccecccccccseccncecccccccecececccccecceceesseresessectsnsesnsnsnensnsnssecensseceeceeeeen, Vv

List Of Tables ooo... ooo ccccccccccccsccccescceceesceccecsecccececsecsacenccscescsasencececesecasesaceecenseceseeneceees vi

Introduction ooo. cecceececeeccsceecencececcceaceccecceaceseesceccacesceecsaresscsseccuscesssarcuseascenesceaeeee: 1

1.0 Statement of Need ooo ccccccccceccccescceccecececseesccececeseceeeceseesecsecsceseeeeneeeen 6

1.10 Definition of Threat... ooo ecccccccccccccccescecesccceseccecsscceesacesssseeenes 7

1.1.1 Characteristics of Cruise Missiles... cecceeeseceeecseeeeeeee 7

PVD Structure. ccc cccccceccceccecceccececeseceseseecesececeesereeeee 7

1.1.1.2 Propulsion ooo... ceccceccccecceecceceseceeceeececsnseessseeeseees 8

1.1.1.3 Guidance and Control ooo. ccceccccccecceescececsceeseeeeeees 10

1.1.1.4 Flight Paths occ ccccccccccccccsseecesseesesseeecseteessseeeeese 13 DeV.1.5 Munitions ooo. cccecccecccceecceceecccecsecceccecesececeescecssceeeaes 14

VV.2 OVETViCW onic ccccccccccceesceeccescesecescececesecseceeceesuecteeenseseeeee 14

1.2 «Current Status oooooiiccicccccccccccccccccccccessesececececcceesseceeessecsnsssasersceseeeses 15

1.30 Fatture Trends ooo ccccccceccceccceceecececccececeeceeceecceercesecsseeseeasensseeeeeees 15

V4 COmchasion ooo ceccccceccesceccecceseescecceccesccesesscsaveccesceseeatesceaeeaeess 16

2.0 Functional Analysis ooo ooo ccccccccccccccccceccccceccceccecceseceseessesseesesaseseeesecesceeeeses 16

2.1 Development of Functional Flow Diagrams. ooo. eeeeeeeeeeeeeee 17

2.2 Allocation of Requirements...o0 o.oo cccceccccccccccecesccecceseeseescesensecseeee 31

2.2.1 Missile Characterization ooo... ooo cccccccccccccecscecsecencceseceseeeees 31

Q.2.1.1 Range ooo ecccecccecceccceccescecesceceseesecseeseeseseescasesesereseees 31

2.2.1.2 Flight Profile ooo. ccccccecceccccsecccsceccescesceeceeceseeeeeee 31

2.2.1.3 Speed oii ccccccccccccecccesceeceessececersecesscessessestaccrsecseeeeee 32

2.2.1.4 Guidance Characteristics 2200... occccccceseceseessecseseceseees 32

2.2.1.5 Control Characteristics 2000000000 ooooecccecccccecececeseceseecseeseee 32

2.2.1.6 Munitions Characteristics ooo. ccccecccecccecceecceeseeseeee 32

2.2.2 Warhead Characterization .ooooooo.oo..ccccccccccesccceeceseceeccesceeseeeeee 33

2.3. Trade Off and Optimization 00000000 ooo ccecccccccecececscceccececeseceeceseceee 33

2.4 Conclusion 36 De Oe ee ROR ROO ERO OP ROH Re eRe OREO ORE OO EE DOH ew Ede sont Meee BEE ROH e ewes eees

ili

Page 5: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

3.0 Failure Amalysis ooo... o..oecccccccccccccecccecececceccceccceccencececeescececeecceeeceeseeeseesseeceesees 37

3.1‘ Failure Modes and Effectiveness Analysis (FMEA) ....................00... 37

3.2 Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) ooooooooooo.cccceccccccccceeccecceccceccecceseeseeeeceeececee 46

3.3 COMCHUSION ooo ceeeccecceccececceccceccecececececcceceecersesecssceeceuceseeseeseess 52

4.0 Vulnerability Analysis ooo... ccc cccccccccccscccsccescceeccceccececceeecceeccececeeesceesceeses 52

AL Untroduction ooo cece ccccccccccecccesccesscececeeseceecceessceeceecececesecesereneees 52

4.2 | Computer Programs For Vulnerability Analysis 00... eee: 54

4.3 COVART Assessment of a Cruise Missile Target 00.0... 59

4A Comet ooo ceccccsescceccccccscceseesceseceeccrsecscesccaseescessesseensesses 62

CONCIUSIONS ooo ooo ccc cccccccccescceseccccesccececsccsccesscesscessessecsecesecssecscsssesssesasesseseressasesseceee: 88

Bibliography .oooooo..ooococccccccccccecccesccescceeceecevecesseeessesecesessessssessesssesesecsessereceseseeeteeseeseces 89

iv

Page 6: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 12

Figure 13

Figure 14

Figure 15

Figure 16

Figure 17

Figure 18

Figure 19

Figure 20

Figure 21

Figure 22

Figure 23

List of Figures

Page System Level Definition For Cruise Missile Vulnerability ... 2

Process For Analyzing Cruise Missile Vulnerability _............ 5

Top Level Functional Flow For A Cruise Missile System ..... 18

Second Level Functional Flow - Missile Launch To Cruise.... 20

Second Level Functional Flow - Missile Midcourse Flight... 21

Second Level Functional Flow -

Midcourse To Target Acquisition. ooo... ..cccccceccceceseceeceeeeeee, 22

Second Level Functional Flow -

Target Acquistion To Intercept 0000.0. ccccceececceeccecccceeeeneeeees 23

Second Level Functional Flow - Damage To Target ............ 25

Third Level Functional Flow - Propulsion |...oo..........0...0.... 27

Third Level Functional Flow - Midcourse Guidance ............ 28

Third Level Functional Flow - Terminal Guidance ............. 29

Third Level Functional Flow - Target Tracking ...000000...00..... 30

First Level Fault Tree For A Cruise Missile System.............. 47

Fault Tree Analysis For A Cruise Missile Guidance

SYStOM occ ccccecceceeceececssseescsesesecseeenseseeeeecesenesseeseeeececesen 48

Fault Tree Analysis For A Cruise Missile Control System.... 50

Fault Tree Analysis For A Cruise Missile Propulsion

SYSTEM ooo ceccceccccesecseececesecsecceceeesevesecsestasessveceeasenseeserseven 51

Fault Tree Analysis For A Cruise Missile Warhead

SYSCOM ooo cccccccceccsccececessceececececesseceaecesseesscssasecesecsasenseeecseceee 51

Viper Cruise Missile ooo. ccccecccccccccecccescceeeceeseeseceessceees 55

Wire Frame Of Viper Geometric Computer Model .............. 56

Viper Propulsion System ooo... ..ccccccecccececececccessceescecsseeesseess 56

Viper Control System ooo... ccccceccceccceeceeeececeseceecesseeeee 57

Viper Guidance System ooo. eeccccecseeeceseeseeseeseveececeeees 37

Typical Pdh Curves ooo... ccccccceccccccccsecccesecececeesseeececeeeesseees. 67

Page 7: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Table 10

Table 11

Table 12

ist of Tabl

Page Cruise Missile Systems Currently In Use o.oo... 34

Characteristics Of A Generic Cruise Missile System ........... 35

Failure Modes And Effects Analysis For A Cruise Missile

SYStOM cee cccccccscseseceecesssseseseseseceesenseecseseeesesenseseseeseneseee: 38

Components Included In Viper FASTGEN Model .............. 58

BASIC File For Viper Assessment ooo... ......cccccccceccceceeeseee, 65

THREAT File For Viper Assessment 200.0000. ooceccecceeeeeceee, 65

MV File For Viper Assessment _..oooo..o.....cccccceceeccessecececceeees 66

PDH File For Viper Assessment .ooooo..o.....cccccsccesccececeseceseees. 68

JTYPE File For Viper Assessment .2oooo...oo.oo.eccecccecceeeseeeeeee 70

Results Of COVART Assessment Of Viper:

0° Azimuth, 0° Elevation oo occ ccccccccccceceseceecceeeeeeee: 72

Results Of COVART Assessment Of Viper:

45° Azimuth, 45° Elevation. ooo... coc ccccceccccccescesceeceeseceeeneee 75

Results Of COVART Assessment Of Viper:

90° Azimuth, 0° Elevation ooo... cccececccccsccceesecescecseeseeeseeee 81

Page 8: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Introduction

The success of Operation Desert Storm created a false sense of security in the West. Iraqi

forces were unable to mount a serious offensive threat to coalition Naval forces. This

situation is not likely to translate into the future. Due to technical advances, limited

defense budgets, and active arms markets, U.S. naval forces may encounter serious

threats in the form of anti-shipping cruise missiles. These weapons are lethal and

increasingly prolific. To make matters worse, existing defenses may be embarrassingly

inadequate.

This report is concerned with the measures of anti-shipping cruise missile vulnerability. It

is divided into two sections. The first section provides background information on both

parts of the report title; vulnerability and cruise missiles. The second section involves

exercising an analysis of a generic, yet practical, cruise missile design.

The system in this case can be looked at in terms of a military conflict. There are two

opposing forces, and the system, as shown in Figure 1, can be defined on many levels.

Total Conflict, between a foreign nation and the United States, comprises the top level. A

Theater \evel system includes the armed forces of both sides and is limited by geography

(although the theater may cover an entire hemisphere). Naval Actions, which comprise

the third level, may play a dominant role in theater operations. The Operations, or Task

Force, level involves the interactions of groups of surface combatants, submarines,

amphibious forces and aircraft. The Unit level is concerned with the interaction of task

force elements. In this case, the interaction is between incoming foreign cruise missiles

and a U.S. Navy surface ship. Finally, this interaction is limited to one attacking cruise

missile and the warhead of a defending surface-to-air missile launched from a ship.

Both elements of this system must be designed, produced, maintained and operated. This

report looks at the interaction between these elements, which occurs during their

operational phases. In these phases, the cruise missile is being fired at a ship and the

warhead is detonating to damage the missile as a means of preventing it from hitting its

target.

Page 9: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

TOTAL CONFLICT

FOREIGN ADVERSARY VS. UNITED STATES

THEATER

FOREIGN MLITARY FORCES VS. U.S. MILITARY FORCES IN STRATEGIC REGION

Y NAVAL ACTIONS

FOREIGN NAVY VS. U.S. NAVY IN STRATEGIC REGION

Y OPERATIONS/

TASK FORCE

GROUP OF FOREIGN NAVAL ASSETS VS. GROUP OF U.S, NAVAL ASSETS

1 UNIT

FOREIGN NAVY ASSET(S) VS. U.S. NAVY ASSET(S)

\

FOREIGN ANTI-SHIPPING CRUISE MISSILE VS.

U.S. SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE WARHEAD

Figure 1: System Level Definition For Cruise Missile Vulnerability

Page 10: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The measure of effectiveness of the cruise missile is the primary concern of the

vulnerability analysis. This is defined as the number of missiles hitting the

target/number of missiles fired or, if single missiles are considered, the probability of a

missile hitting a target. This could be expressed as follows:

measure of effectiveness = (1-susceptability* vulnerability)* prob(hit/sur vival)

Susceptability (designated Pp) refers to the probability of the missile being hit by a

damage causing mechanism. Vulnerability (designated Pk/n) refers to the missile's

inability to withstand damage. These two measures are dependent on the capabilities and

characteristics of the missile and the means intended to damage it. The probability of

hit/survival refers to the probability of the missile to hit the target in the absence of

damage mechanisms.

Ideally, the Navy would like to keep the measure of effectiveness as low as possible.

Realistically, a value of zero would not be practical. A factor of 0.05, however, would

be considered a reasonable objective.

The "problem" from the perspective of the surface ship could be identified as finding a

means of preventing an incoming missile from completing its mission. Preventing a

missile from sinking a ship involves identifying and exploiting any vulnerabilities in the

missile and its subsystems. This can be accomplished through either countermeasures or

kill mechanisms. Countermeasures are more likely to affect the sensor and guidance

systems, while kill mechanisms affect every subsystem. In most cases, only a few

components need to be damaged to disable an entire system. Often, rendering one

subsystem inoperable would be sufficient to prevent the missile from completing its

mission.

There is an old saying that recommends "knowing your enemy” if you hope to be

successful in defeating them. Cruise missiles are flexible weapons that can be launched

from surface ships, submarines, aircraft or land-based positions. A wide, and growing,

variety of these systems are currently in service. By most indications, these systems are

quite effective. Compared to ships and attack aircraft, in terms of money and human

safety, they are a bargain. They are deadly as well, to which experience in the Falklands

and the Persian Gulf can attest.

Page 11: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Cruise missiles, despite their capabilities (and reputation), have weaknesses. To

determine these weaknesses, the physical and functional characteristics of the specific

target must be carefully analyzed. In doing so, it can be seen that cruise missiles can be

looked at as systems that are composed of several subsystems. These subsystems

include: a) propulsion systems, b) sensor systems, c) guidance systems, d) control

systems, e) warheads and f) airframe. The missile operates as the result of these various

subsystems working together.

There are a number of design paths which are followed in the cruise missile design

process. As aresult, there is a wide spectrum of viable threats to be considered; for

example, missile cruise speeds vary greatly (from subsonic to mach 5+). Of course,

architectural details, such as propulsion systems (solid rocket, liquid rocket, turbojet,

turbofan and ramjet), sensors, guidance packages and warhead characterization differ

considerably, as well.

Although the above characteristics contribute to the effectiveness of a missile system,

there are no definitive guidelines into which details make for better missiles. It all boils

down to the limits of mission objectives, technology and defense budgets. In short, the

design and production of a type of missile is the result of a systems process.

The procedure followed during this study to analyze cruise missile vulnerability is shown

in Figure 2.

The first section of this report looks at the vulnerability analysis process from a Systems

perspective. The threat to Navy ships by cruise missiles is defined and an overview of

missile architecture is presented. The need for proper analysis of missile systems, both

current and future, is then presented. A functional analysis is then conducted to

determine the arrangement and operational characteristics that are typical for cruise

missile systems. Next, a specific target is defined by comparing the characteristics of

existing systems. Finally, the failure modes of this target are analyzed by developing a

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and by performing a Fault Tree Analysis

(FTA).

Page 12: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The second part of this report involves the results of applying the principles of

vulnerability to a generic missile target. This target is based on existing systems and

represents a viable threat. The damage mechanism applied here, HE fragmenting

warheads, is the most probable, but not exclusive, defense against missiles. The analysis

consists of modeling the target, determining which subsystems and/or components are

vulnerable, determining the degree of this vulnerability, and finally, quantifying the

vulnerability of the missile to fragmenting warheads.

STATEMENT OF NEED DEFINED

*THREAT DEFINITION “CURRENT STATUS “FUTURE TRENDS

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS CONDUCTED

“FUNCTIONAL FLOW “ALLOCATION OF REQUIREMENTS “TRADE OFF ANDO OPTIMIZATION

1 FAILURE ANALYSIS

CONDUCTED

“FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) “FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA)

! VULNERABILITY

ANALYSIS CONDUCTED

“SYSTEM MODEL CONSTRUCT “DETERMINATION OF VULNEAABLE AREAS

Figure 2: Process For Analyzing Cruise Missile Vulnerability

This analysis took only hard kill mechanisms into account. Countermeasure techniques

are a viable means of defeating missiles, but follow a completely different methodology,

and a thorough explanation of them was beyond the scope of this report.

Page 13: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

1.0 Statement of Need

The first step in conducting a systems engineering approach to evaluating cruise missile

vulnerability is identifying the system need. In this case, the need of the system is

exactly the opposite of the need of one of its elements. The need statement of this

element, the missile, could be stated as follows: the missile must be able to find, track

and reach a target, and inflict as much damage as possible upon reaching it. The system

need statement could be written as follows: We must prevent the missile from finding,

tracking and reaching its target, or prevent it from inflicting an amount of damage that is

sufficient to disable its target. To satisfy this basic need at least 95% of the time, the

Navy can concentrate on defending against missiles before, during or after launch.

Defending against missiles by preventing them from being launched in the first place, by

attacking the launch platform, requires the adoption of a "shoot-first", or "defense

through good offense” policy. This policy makes sense in the frame of a total war

scenario, provided the launch platforms could be located in time. Unfortunately, this is

not always the case. Furthermore, destroying all platforms is a difficult task. Invariably,

a certain number of missiles are likely to be launched.

Realizing that the HMS Sheffield was virtually destroyed by an Exocet missile that did

not detonate , expecting to minimize damage after being hit by a missile is difficult.

Hardening ships by installing armor is expensive, and the additional weight on topdeck

structures has adverse effects on stability. Installing defensive compartments and

designing for survivability is a worthwhile pursuit, but only partially successful against

missiles that may carry warheads that weigh in excess of 500 lbs (225 kg).

Consequently, the Navy needs to look at the threats that it may encounter. Once these

threats have been identified, ways to engage them en route to their targets must be

determined. To do this, the Navy needs to analyze the operational characteristics of

these threats, determine their vulnerabilities, and exploit these vulnerabilities by

deception techniques and/or hard kill mechanisms. The results of this analysis should

remain valid for the life cycle of the missile (10-15 years), and the process should remain

flexible enough to account for modifications in missile physical and functional

characteristics.

Page 14: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Most of the vulnerability analysis being conducted on new missile systems is based on

knowledge of existing systems. In many cases, this approach is valid. Unfortunately,

reliance on these methods should not be taken for granted. Systems, and the means to

defeat them, change as the result of technological and economic factors. For this reason,

a process that analyzes cruise missile systems, beginning from the basic level and

proceeding in depth and detail, needs to be implemented.

1.1 Definition of Threat

It is estimated that anti-shipping cruise missiles pose the greatest threat to the surface

forces of the U.S. Navy. The reasoning behind this is two-fold. First, missiles are potent

weapons. They are hard to detect, hard to intercept, and are capable of inflicting serious

damage to ships. Secondly, as the result of economic factors, they are proliferating into

an ever-growing number of second- and third- world arsenals.

During the Gulf War, The USS Princeton was essentially crippled by one mine. Public

reaction to a $1.0 Billion+ ship being disabled by a product of 19th century technology

was less than enthusiastic. Cruise missiles are more modern, and even more lethal than

mines. The Navy would have much to answer for if it did not have a means of defense

for its assets.

1.1.1 Characteristics of Cruise Missiles

Cruise missiles come in all shapes and sizes. This section is included to present an

overview of the architecture and operational characteristics of cruise missiles.

1.1.1.1 Structure

The structure of the missile is designed to support the internals, such as warhead,

guidance and propulsion subsystems. It must be strong enough to withstand forces of

motion (weight, lift, thrust and drag), yet light enough to not contribute significantly to

those forces. The weapon must be shaped for optimum efficiency, yet must take into

account the constraints imposed by storage facilities, launch mechanisms and platforms.

Page 15: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

In their most complicated forms, cruise missiles are constructed like aircraft, with a

weight bearing frame and an external skin. This method is seldom used by modern

missiles, however. Instead, most viable threats are small (15' - 25' (4.5-7.6 meters) long)

and monocoque in shape, with the outer skin (usually steel, aluminum or titanium) held in

shape by bulkheads and occasional stiffeners.

Missiles are fitted with sets of lifting and control surfaces that provide the means to alter

the angle of attack. The location and configuration of these foils can significantly alter the

performance characteristics of the missile. Smaller, "skid-to-turn" missiles feature a

forward set (usually 4) of fixed wing surfaces and an aft set of variable control surfaces.

Some missiles, such as Tomahawk and Styx, fly much like aircraft, using a pair of

horizontal wings for "bank-to-turn” control.

1.1.1.2 Propulsion

The objective of the propulsion system in cruise missiles is to obtain thrust by generating

rearward momentum in the form of exhaust gases. Rockets create this flow in a manner

that uses working fluid that is carried onboard the vehicle, while air breathing engines

rely on external sources for propellant gas.

There are two types of rockets being utilized in cruise missiles: liquid propellant and

solid, or hypergolic, propellant. Liquid propellant systems have the fuel and oxidizer

components carried in low pressure tanks. They are capable of being throttled. They do

however, require “plumbing” in the form of pumps, and fuel lines, and the components

tend to be corrosive and volatile. Solid rockets are simple in design. Essentially, the

entire rocket motor serves as the combustion chamber. Solid rockets , however, are self-

sustaining and burning rate is not controllable.

Turbojets, turbofans and ramjets fall into the category of air breathing engines. All

engines of this type operate on the following principles: i) air must be injected, 1i)

propellant must be supplied, 111) combustion must occur and iv) products must be

ejected. The high temperature and pressure of the exhaust gases provide kinetic energy to

the air flow trailing the missile. Gas turbines are best suited for operation at transonic

and supersonic speeds while ramjets are best when operating at high supersonic speeds.

Page 16: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Ramjets are simple in design (no moving parts) and efficient at high speed. A basic

ramjet consists of a cylindrical tube, open at both ends, with an interior fuel-injection

system. The ramjet operates by taking high speed, low pressure air in through a diffuser

section. The diffuser converts this air to high pressure, low speed air flow. This flow

mixes with fuel, which is continuously sprayed into the engine by injectors. Spark plug-

like devices called initiators commence burning, with subsequent burning being

uninterrupted and self-supporting. Ramjets are unable to develop thrust while at rest, so

a booster system must be used to accelerate the missile to near its operating speed.

Turbojets utilize high-pressure compressors that are turbine driven (with a fraction of the

exhaust gases running the turbine). The major components of a turbojet engine are the

inlet, compressor, combustor, turbine and nozzle. Inlets capture air from the freestream

and may decelerate it to provide uniform, subsonic flow to the compressor. The

compressor is used to increase the pressure of this air. Combustors operate by having

fuel sprayed into a centralized region where the fuel evaporates and the fuel ignites.

Exhaust nozzles focus the high pressure exhaust gas and thus control the kinetic energy

and reaction force on the missile.

Turbofans are extensions of the turbojet concept. Turbofans are generally more efficient

than turbojets, as they utilize a second stage of turbine blades to extract additional energy

from the gases aft of the compressor turbine.

In addition to propulsion related components, turbojets and turbofans require lubrication,

cooling, and accessory drive subsystems. The lubrication subsystem is usually a self-

contained pressurized oil system (composed of tanks, pumps, lines and coolers that

lubricates bearings and accessory drives. The engine cooling subsystem may utilize a

closed, pressurized liquid system, fuel, or freestream air to prevent engine components

from being damaged by thermal stress. The accessory drives provide power to the other

various subsystems.

Currently, all of the above systems are used; however, the majority of missile systems use

either solid rockets or turbojets. Ramjets have been come into greater use recently.

Future systems can be expected to make further use of these systems.

Page 17: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

1.1.1.3. Guidance and Control

Guidance and Control is the means in which a missile tracks, and ultimately intercepts, its

target. The specifics of how this is accomplished vary, not only from missile to missile,

but also where the missile is located in its flight path. Every missile guidance and control

system consists of an attitude control system and a flight path control system. The

attitude control system is responsible for maintaining the missile in the desired attitude by

controlling pitch, roll and yaw. The flight path control system determines the flight path

necessary to intercept the target and issues commands to the attitude control system to

maintain that path.

The line of sight (LOS), which refers to the line between the sensor and the target, is the

crucial measurement of any terminal guidance package. The parameters associated with

this measurement are target azimuth, elevation, range, and relative velocity. The

difference between this line and the tracking line (the "line" in which the missile is

traveling) is considered the error. The guidance and control system is heavily reliant on

feedback, with corrective adjustments being made when a guidance error, or missile

instability, is present. Guidance and stabilization corrections are combined and the result

is applied as an error signal to the control system. The control system is "driven" to

respond to this error until the tracking line becomes incident with the LOS.

The primary components associated with the attitude control system are the devices for

measuring attitude and motion, the autopilot, and the control surfaces. The flight path

control system is a computer, which may or may not be located on board the missile. The

control surfaces are wings or fins that work to regulate airflow over the air frame. Their

controlling mechanisms are usually hydraulic or electrical.

There are usually three missile guidance phases: boost, midcourse and terminal. The

boost phase usually refers to the early stages of flight, at or near launch. Essentially,

“guidance” during this phase involves having the missile clear the launch platform and

being placed in a position in which it can either see the target or receive external guidance

signals. The likelihood of intercepting the missile during this phase is remote, however.

10

Page 18: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The midcourse phase of guidance is the longest in both time and distance. Corrections

may be necessary to bring the missile onto and maintain the desired course. Several

means may be used to provide information to the guidance system. The midcourse phase

usually ends when the missile is near the target, and the terminal phase begins.

Midcourse guidance can either rely on control guidance systems (using a combination of

internal and external components), or self contained systems (using exclusively on-board

components).

With self contained systems, all guidance and control equipment is located on board the

missile. In cruise missiles, these systems usually utilize an inertial navigation package.

These systems are responsible for placing the missile in a predetermined location, with

the missile's flight path constantly being corrected by means of gyro-stabilized

accelerometers. Most missiles utilize three types: to measure vertical, lateral and

longitudinal accelerations (to measure altitude, azimuth and range respectively). Desired

values are compared with measured values, and if necessary, correction signals are sent to

the control system.

The terminal guidance phase requires a highly accurate, fast-response, system of sensors

and controls. The sensors usually home in on a signature of the target. Active radar is the

most common type of sensor, although infrared, passive radar and optical systems are

used as well. The missile is guided on the basis of electromagnetic radiation contact with

the target. Azimuth and elevation of the target are required for homing to be successful.

Guidance can be either active, semi-active or passive with reference to a line of sight

sensor. Active systems contain both the transmitter and receiver. An on-board computer

calculates a course to intercept the target and sends steering commands to the autopilot.

Semiactive homing relies on a tracking radar that is located at the launching sight. The

missile is equipped with a receiver only, and uses reflections from the target to formulate

an intercept path. Passive homing relies on energy that emanates from the target (such as

heat or radio transmissions) for guidance.

11

Page 19: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Radar uses electromagnetic waves to remote-sense the position, velocity and identifying

characteristics of targets. Most missile guidance radars are essentially specialized

tracking radars. The basic parameter measured by the tracking radar is the line of sight

between the antenna and the target. There are usually two types of radar used in anti-

shipping cruise missiles: pulse and pulse-doppler.

Pulse radars illuminate targets by transmitting short bursts of energy and listen for echoes

while the transmitter is silent. In the case of directional antennas, the line of sight to the

target can be accurately determined. Target range is determined by measuring the time it

takes for the pulse to return and multiplying that number by the speed of light (the

velocity of the wave) and dividing by 2 (to account for round-trip travel).

All radars operate in accordance with the same principles. Performance, on the other

hand, varies considerably. Essentially, all pulse radar systems have the following

components in common: antenna, antenna servo, synchronizer, modulator, duplexer,

transmitter, receiver, receiver protection device, and power supply.

The antenna concentrates the signal into a narrow beam that is radiated in a single

direction. The antenna is steerable, by means of the antenna servo. The synchronizer

times the transmission of the radar pulses. The modulator provides input power to the

transmitter. The duplexer is an electronic device which switches single antennas between

the transmit and receive modes. The transmitter generates the radar signal. The receiver

intercepts and amplifies the echo signals.

Pulse doppler radars are specialized versions of pulse systems. Pulse doppler systems

utilize most of the same components as pulse systems. They do, however, feature the

following innovations: highly versatile transmitters that are capable of measuring

doppler frequencies (and thus, velocities), the use of digital signal processors for high

speed signal processing, the use of radar data processors to control and monitor all

elements of the system, and the integration of the radar into the inertial navigation

system.

12

Page 20: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The components associated with pulse doppler systems differ from pulse systems in the

following: the modulator is eliminated, with its functions being performed by the

transmitter, a component, called the exciter, is used to establish the radio frequency of

the transmitter, the synchronizer is eliminated, with its functions being performed by the

radar data processor.

Since no one system is ideal for all phases of guidance, composite systems are often used.

For example, inertial guidance may be utilized during the midcourse phase, with homing

guidance used during the terminal phase.

1.1.1.4 Flight Paths

Flight paths are determined by the guidance system. They can be either preset or

variable. Preset flight paths can be either constant or programmed. Variable flight paths

rely on target position and velocity. The four basic types of variable flight paths are

pursuit, constant-bearing, proportional navigation and line of sight. The pursuit type of

flight path strives to keep the missile pointed at the target at all times. Constant-bearing

flight paths aim at the point in which the missile expects to intercept the target. Changes

in target heading and velocity are accounted for by continuously recalculating the

aimpoint. Proportional navigation takes into account changes in the line of sight. These

changes are passed on to the computer, which generates steering commands for the

autopilot. Line of sight flight paths follow along the LOS between the launching

platform and the target.

The actual profile of flight varies from missile to missile. Most slower (high subsonic)

missiles travel at low altitude to avoid detection. At the terminal phase, they may

maintain this profile or they may execute a series of maneuvers to evade defenses or to

intercept a specific area of a ship. High speed missiles may cruise in at a high altitude,

and dive in, using speed as a defense, to intercept their target.

13

Page 21: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

1.1.1.5 Munitions

The munitions, or ordnance, system refers to the means which the missile uses to

complete its mission (damaging a shipping target). This involves 1) a container to hold

the damage mechanisms, ii) the damage mechanisms themselves, which could be

fragments, or blast or incendiary devices and iii) a means of deciding when to release the

mechanisms. Cruise missile munitions usually fall into the category of warhead/fuse

systems, although some systems consist of kinetic energy penetrators or explosive

submunitions.

Warheads usually consist of a hard outer casing (usually made of steel or some other high

hardness metal) filled with high explosive, a central core initiator, and fusing devices.

Depending on the warhead shape and orientation, the ordnance system can be designed to

detonate after penetrating the target, at impact, or at close proximity to the target (usually

just above). Fuses can be located in the nose area to detonate on impact or a set time

afterwards or they can be timed in accordance with the guidance system. The

characteristics of the case and explosive are instrumental to the lethality of the warhead.

Fragment size and velocity can be dictated by geometry and scoring on the surface of the

case as well as the amount and type of explosive charge.

Cruise missiles fitted with submunitions utilize a release mechanism to eject penetrators

or bomblets over a wide area. Although the area in question is usually associated with

ground forces or airfields, the concept may be applied in the anti-shipping role.

1.1.2 Overview

The threats to U.S. Navy ships are diverse. Incoming missiles may be traveling at high

subsonic speeds to speeds in excess of Mach 5.0. They may be traveling just above the

surface of the waves, executing evasive maneuvers, or they may be executing a steep

terminal dive. They may be using rockets, turbojets or ramjets, guided by active radar,

to reach the end of their mission. To properly defend its assets, the U.S. Navy needs to

look at all of these possibilities.

14

Page 22: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

1.2 Current Status

Currently, both deceptive techniques and hard kill mechanisms are in use by the U.S.

Navy. Deceptive measures involve using physical or electronic means to disorient or

mislead the guidance system of an incoming missile. These techniques can be relatively

effective, but a thorough presentation of them is beyond the scope of this report.

Hard kill mechanisms, on the other hand, involve intercepting the missile with high

energy projectiles so as to inflict enough damage to prevent the missile from reaching its

target. The problem amounts to knowing how much energy is required, and at what

location to apply it.

A number of systems, such as Phalanx and Standard missile, are currently envisioned in

the hard kill role. New projectile and warhead designs are constantly being proposed. In

each case, the energy distribution of projectiles or fragments is known or estimated with

reasonable certainty. Knowing where to deliver these particles (as penetrators) requires a

knowledge of the arrangement and operational characteristics of the incoming missiles.

Finding accurate and detailed information about potential threats is difficult, and reliance

on previous knowledge is not always valid; thus, a process needs to be followed to

determine the vulnerability of various cruise missile systems to existing or postulated

defenses. This requires identifying, in order, the missile functions, missile components,

possible failure modes, component vulnerability, and ultimately, the system vulnerability.

1.3 Future Trends

It is expected that cruise missiles will continue to pose a serious threat well into the next

millennium. Future systems could be expected to be faster, more maneuverable and

harder to detect. Hard kill mechanisms will remain a viable means to counter this threat.

For this reason, vulnerability analysis will remain a vital tool.

15

Page 23: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

1.4 nclusi

Despite the various approaches to cruise missile design, all systems have the same

intention. They must find, track and fly to a target before they can damage it. Defeating

these systems, through deception, or hard kill, requires knowledge of the system's

vulnerabilities. By defining the need statement, we have shown that we have a definite

requirement to determine the vulnerability of cruise missiles. A detailed analysis of how

the system functions is required to determine these vulnerabilities.

2.0 Functional Analysis

Quite often, the Systems Engineering Process involves identifying a need, proposing a

means to satisfy that need, and designing a system to accomplish these means. In the

case of analyzing cruise missile vulnerability, the need, (preventing cruise missiles from

reaching and damaging U.S. Navy ships) and the means (hard kill mechanisms exploiting

vulnerabilities) seem to fit this process. The "designed system," however, is not involved

in accomplishing the means. Instead, this system is the recipient of the means.

Furthermore, this system is usually designed, produced , and operated, under different

conditions, by an adversary.

In the case of a Systems Engineering approach to cruise missile vulnerability, the system

under analysis may already be in existence. Even so, there is not great deal of

information available about how the system is arranged or operates. To determine these

characteristics, a functional analysis is performed.

Functional analysis involves identifying system operational and support requirements

and translating them into specific design requirements. This translation is accomplished

through the development of functional flow diagrams. The functional approach is used as

a basis for identifying design requirements for each level of the system.

16

Page 24: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Functions usually fall into the operational or maintenance categories. When analyzing

cruise missile systems, maintenance is not an overwhelming factor, as a missile is only

required to be used once. Maintenance functions are limited to keeping the missile ready

to be launched on demand. This usually involves keeping the missile stored, usually in

storage canisters, at facilities or on ships that protect the missile from the effects of its

environment. These facilities must be located to insure rapid availability and maintain

security.

The most important functional concerns, from a vulnerability standpoint, are operational

functions. Operational functions are those functions that are associated with fulfilling

mission requirements.

2.1 Development of Functional Flow Diagrams

Functional flow diagrams present system requirements in functional terms. Constructing

them begins with a definition of what the system must accomplish. Subsequent layers

provide more detail into what is being done within the system. Ultimately, the diagram is

detailed enough so that individual components can be identified.

The top level of a functional flow diagram shows all of the gross operational functions

that must be performed in order for a system to accomplish its mission. The warhead

functions are limited to fusing, detonation and fragment dispersion. A typical cruise

missile, from the perspective defined here, is more complicated. The top level functional

flow diagram for this element is presented in Figure 3.

These functions are arranged in series. Thus disrupting any of these functions will result

in the missile being unable to complete its mission, which from the vulnerability

standpoint, is a successful mission.

At this point, no components, or subsystems, are clearly defined. In the second level, the

system functions that are required for the gross functions to be accomplished are

identified. At this level, the various systems become apparent.

17

Page 25: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

; T

1

1.0 PLATFORM ENTERS RANGE

2.0 TARGET

INDENTIFIED YY AM

_d \-

t

4.0 MISSILE FAILS

PRE-FLIGHT

32.0 MISSILE PASSES

PRE-FLIGHT

G Y 7.0

MISSILE LAUNCHED

6.0 ALTERNATE

MISSILE CHOSEN

30 ! REDAIRED 8.0

A MISSILE BOOSTED | TO CRUISE

9.0 MISSILE REACHES SENSOR RANGE

DAMAGES TARGET

vel Functional Flow For A ise Mi

18

Page 26: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

At the operational level, the first function in Figure 3 is identified as "launching platform

reaches the proper launch range". The launch platform is either an aircraft, a surface

ship, a submarine, or a land based platform (which can be mobile or fixed). To

accomplish the gross function, these platforms must remain capable of launching

offensive weapons. Preferably, they remain undetected, although damage is the true

intention here. From the vulnerability standpoint, the objective is to prevent the platform

from reaching a point where they can launch missiles.

The second function in Figure 3 is “target is identified by launch platform”. Usually,

some type of sensor is used by the launching platform. These are usually search radars,

although acoustic (sonar), and visual (reconnaissance) means are also employed. The

vulnerability intention is to prevent detection, either by deception, jamming or physical

elimination of search systems. |

The third through sixth functions in Figure 3 involve preflight preparations for the

missile. This requires the missile to be taken from the stored state, passing preflight

inspection, and then being placed into the launch system. The mechanisms are missile

and platform specific. In the event of aircraft launch, missiles must be loaded onto

launch rails (tactical attack aircraft) or into bomb bays (for strategic or intermediate range

bombers). Surface ships require the missile to be mounted on rails, box launchers or

vertical launch systems. Submarines require missiles to be loaded into torpedo tubes or

vertical launching tubes. Land based systems require missiles to be loaded onto rails or

box launchers. Vulnerability concerns include damaging the launching systems to

prevent missiles from being loaded.

The seventh function in Figure 3 is "missile launched" by platform. The launch system

must function properly and the missile’s propulsion system must be initiated. From a

vulnerability standpoint, the launch system must be rendered inoperable, or the missile's

propulsion system must be damaged. The flow diagram for a turbojet propulsion system

is shown in Figure 4. At this level we are able to identify the principal components of the

propulsion system are identified.

19

Page 27: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

REF. 7.0 MISSILE

LAUNCHED

Y 7.1

INITIAL POWER

SUPPLIED

Y 7.2

. COMPONENTS LUBRICATED/ COOLED

Y 7.3

AIR ENTERS INFAKE

4 7.4

-——___—__ p> AIR OMPRESSED

Y 7.5

FUEL PUMPED FROM TANKS

Y 46

FUEL INJECTED

INTO CHAMBER

Y 7.7

FUEL/AIR

MIXTURE IGNITED

N 78

TURBINE

GENERATES POWER

Y 7.9

EXHAUST GASES

EXPANDED

4 7.10

THRUST DEVELOPED

Y Put

Figure 4: Second Level Functional Flow - Missile Launch to Cruise

20

Page 28: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The eighth function in Figure 3 is "missile boosted to cruise.” Many missiles must be

accelerated to a cruise velocity. This is usually accompanied by the missile reaching a

desired altitude. The function flow diagram is shown in Figure 5. This function is

dependent on both the propulsion and control systems. The vulnerability consideration

here is to damage either of these systems.

8.4 TERMINAL GUIDANCE [#2 TURNED ON

REF. 8.0 8.1 82 83 MISSILE PROPULSION CONTROL LOCATION (or)

BOOSTED lan systeM || sysTEM lan OFMIssLE = TO CRUISE OPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL DETERMINED B5

i GUIDANCE SOLUTION GENERATED

Y 8.6

ADJUSTMENTS MADE TO

PROPULSION

Y 8.7

ADJUSTMENT MADE TO CONTROLS

Figure 5: Second Level Functional Flow - Missile Midcourse Flight

21

Page 29: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The ninth function in Figure 3 is "missile reaches sensor range." Missiles are usually

launched outside of the range of on-board sensors. When the missile has reached a

certain point, on-board systems replace the launch platform's systems for guidance and

tracking. The propulsion, guidance and control systems must function properly up to this

point. Depending on the missile system, the midpoint may be determined prior to launch,

and the missile must identify when it reaches this point (fire and forget systems) or the

launch platform guides the missile to this point and signals for the missile to turn on its

terminal systems. The functional flow is shown in Figure 6. From a vulnerability

perspective, damaging or disorienting these systems will disrupt this process.

9.4 TARGET bo

REF. 9.0 LOCATED MISSILE PROPULSION CONTROL 30 SENSOR(S) | py PEACHES | system [OP] system + SEARCH FOR (or) Nee OPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL TARGET O56

TARGET NOT

LOCATED

The tenth function in Figure 3, “Target acquired/tracked" is shown in Figure 7. The on-

board sensors system acquires the signature, and establishes and maintains a track of the

target. The track is vital for directing the missile in reaching the target. As with the

earlier function involving the launch platform, the vulnerability concerns involve

deceiving or damaging the sensor systems. The difference here is that the systems are

located on the missile itself, which is a smaller, faster and closer to the target.

22

Page 30: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

REF. 10.0 TARGET

ACQUIRED TRACKED

10.1

PROPULSION

| SYSTEM OPERATIONAL

10.2 CONTROL SYSTEM

OPERATIONAL

10.3 TARGET TRACK

MAINTAINED

105 - LOS TRAJECTORY COMPARISON

10.4

TARGET TRACK LOST

F igure 7: Second Level Functional Flow - Target Acquisition To Interce

23

0.8 ADJUSTMENT:

MADE TO CONTROLS

_4

10.8 ADJUSTMENTS

MADE TO PROPULSION

I

10.7 NEW

TRAJECTORY SOLUTION

10.6 PATH

MAINTAINED

Y 10.10

CHECK RANGE

t

Page 31: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The missile flies to target, avoiding defenses, during the terminal phase. The control

system follows instructions based on target tracking data. These instructions dictate the

flight path that the missile must follow to reach the target. The vulnerability side must

concern itself with making the control system ineffective or disrupting communication

between the sensor, guidance, and control systems.

The final gross operational function, "Missile damages target," is shown in Figure 8.

This function involves detonating a warhead, with the intent of disabling or sinking a

ship. The warhead system must function properly, detonating at the right time and

location. The vulnerability side must be concerned with limiting damage to their

resources. This is difficult, as even if the warhead does not detonate, significant damage

could be expected. However, large ships are capable of withstanding numerous hits at

non-critical locations. Thus, the intention of the vulnerability team is to get the warhead

to a) not detonate at all, b) detonate ineffectively ("fizz") or c) detonate at a location that

does not cause critical damage. This may involve damaging the control system or

warhead components.

At this point, the various subsystems can be identified for a cruise missile. They include

propulsion, sensors/guidance, controls, and munitions. The structural system, which

encloses all of the other systems could also be considered a system. Furthermore, we can

determine which components are included in the propulsion and munitions systems. A

third level functional analysis will help in identifying guidance and control components.

24

Page 32: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

REF. 11.0 MISSILE REACHES TARGET

(=)

14.2 11.1 FUSE SENDS

PUse DETONATION SIGNAL

11.3 WARHEAD DOES NOT

DETONATE

11.4

INITIATOR

~ BEGINS

DETONATION

oy, 1 11.5

BOOST

CHARGE

, DETONATES

11.6 INEFFECTIVE (on)

DETONATION

' 11.7

~ MAIN

CHARGE

DETONATES

11.8

CASE

FRAGMENTS

Y

Figure 8: Second Level Functional Flow - Damage To Target

25

Page 33: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Figure 9 is similar to the second level diagram for initiating propulsion for a turbojet

system. In this case, propulsion is merely being sustained. Although only Function 8.1 is

referenced, the diagram could be referenced to Functions 9.1 or 10.1.

Figure 10 presents the functional flow for midcourse guidance. This involves

determining where the missile is, and comparing that location to a predetermined value.

Longitudinal, lateral and vertical accelerometers measure x -,y -, and z- direction

accelerations, which are integrated to determine range, azimuth and altitude. The

missile's location is continuously being monitored, with feedback being used to adjust the

control system.

Figure 11 is similar to Figure 10, although this diagram represents the terminal guidance

phase. Here, the missile's location is compared to the location of the target. The

difference between the flight path and the line of sight to the target is identified as an

error, which is sought to be corrected by the control system.

Figure 12 shows the functional flow of the tracking radar. In this case, the diagram

represents a pulse doppler system. Although this diagram represents a third level of

functions, it could be referenced to Function 8.4.4 as well.

At this point, the primary systems and components of a cruise missile have been shown.

26

Page 34: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

REF 8.1.0 PROPULSION SYSTEM

OPERATIONAL

y 8.1.1

COMPONENTS LUBRICATED/ COOLED

Y 8.1.2

AIR ENTERS INTAKE

t 8.1.3

RR oo AIR COMPRESSED

! 8.1.4

FUEL PUMPED FROM TANKS

Y 6.1.5 FUEL

INJECTED INTC CHAMBER

8.1.6 — FUEL/AIR MIXTURE IGNITED

8.1.7 TURBINE

GENERATES POWER

Y 8.1.8

EXHAUST GASES

EXPANDED

y 8.1.9

THRUST DEVELOPED

!

Figure 9: Third Level Functional Flow - Propulsion

27

Page 35: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

~a

aaisnrav $390V3"NS TOXNLNOOS

see

}

SIVNOIS BAIZ930

SYOLWNLOV

£e8

t

SIVNOIS SOGN3S

LOMwdOLNY 9ce8

OaNiv LNIVA

3SYNOD

sees

d3yuV¥dNOO S3MNWA

L3S3td ONV

G3yNSVAN

v28

QSNIWH31L3G 3QnLiLW

e283

G3NINH3L30 HLAWZW

y

QSN!WH3L30

FONVY lee

WNOLVH3d0

W3LSAS OX

1LNOOS 0°28

430

4

28

Page 36: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

aaisnrav

SIVNOIS 3AI39348

SYHOLVNLOV By'B ‘

SIVNOIS Y

OANiV LNIVAN ASWNOS

oV78

Q3NINH3130

HOuHS ONIMOVEL

sve

QANIWY3 130 LHOIS

40 SNN

L390Vi vrEe

Q3NiW3 130

aqnuiLi

eve Pa

O3NINH3136

HLOWIZV ove

Q3NIWH3 130 JONVH bys

NO QaNdNL

FONVOIND WNIWYSL

O'v8 434

t

29

Page 37: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Figure 12: Thir

9.3.2 DUPLEXER

> SWITCHES

REF 9.3.0 SENSOR IS) SEARCH FOR

TARGET

Y 9.3.1

POWER SUPPLIED TO RADAR

Y

TO SEND

Y 9.3.3

EXCITER ESTABLISHES TRANSMITTER FREQUENCY

Y 9.3.4

TRANSMITTER GENERATES

SIGNAL

ANTENNA 7

9.3.6 SIGNAL

TRANSMITTED

y 9.3.7

DUPLEXER SWITCHES TO RECEIVE

Y 9.3.8 ECHO

RECEIVED

Y 9.3.9

SIGNAL PROCESSED

y 9.3.10

(REF. 8.4.4) TARGET

LINE OF SIGHT DETERMINED

ae

~wZv

vel Functional Flow - T

30

Tr kin

Page 38: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

2.2 I] ion of iremen

The allocation of requirements step of the functional analysis is the point in which actual

requirements of the system are defined. In the case of a vulnerability analysis of cruise

missiles, this step involves identifying the operational characteristics of both the cruise

missile systems and the defensive systems that we are employing to defeat them.

2.2.1 Missile Characterization

The following missile parameters need to be considered: range, flight profile, speed,

guidance characteristics, control characteristics, and munitions characteristics. If existing

systems are an indication, there are wide ranges in most of these characteristics.

2.2.1.1 Range

Cruise missiles must be launched from ranges that protect the launching platform.

However, once the missile is launched, most systems are "on their own." Longer ranges

require larger powerplants, and/or increased fuel capacities. Guidance and control

systems on missiles are generally less capable than those of the launch platform, and

longer ranges tend to allow more things to go wrong with them. In general, missile range

varies significantly, from less than 10 to over 1500 nautical miles.

2.2.1.2 Flight Profile

The intention here is for the missile to follow a flight path that is efficient, yet makes

interception as difficult as possible. Depending on the launching platform, the missiles

may be launched from zero altitude or high altitude. Following launch, they may climb

to higher altitudes, dive to intermediate or low altitudes (sea skimming) or maintain the

altitude of launch. Terminal flight profiles may consist of diving into the target, popping

up and then diving into the top of the target, flying horizontally into the side of the target

or flying over top of the target. In most cases, flight profiles are determined prior to

launch and are system specific.

31

Page 39: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

2.2.1.3 Speed

The objective is to have a missile reach a target as safely and quickly as possible. High

speed targets give defenses less time to react, but at the price of maneuverability and

detection. Slower missiles are able to creep up on a target and are relatively

maneuverable, which makes them difficult to hit as well. As a result, both schools of

thought figure into missile design, with speeds varying significantly, from high subsonic

to mach 5.0 or above.

2.2.1.4 Guidance Characteristics

There are a number of ways in which a missile is guided to a target. There are three

phases. Boost phase involves the guidance from launch to cruise, and is usually dictated

by the launch platform. Midcourse guidance is responsible for getting the missile from

the launch area to a range in which the terminal sensors are effective. The terminal

guidance system must operate at a range that allows for an accurate identification of a

target and gives the missile the opportunity to reach the target. On board sensors are

limited by size and power constraints as dictated by the missile. Powerful sensors are

larger, use more energy and add additional weight and size to a missile. These factors

tend to degrade the dynamic performance of the missile.

2.2.1.5 Control Characteristics

Missiles can be highly maneuverable and slow, very fast and not very maneuverable, or a

combination of these characteristics. Increasing speeds and maneuverability require

stronger airframes, which lead to increased complexity and cost.

2.2.1.6 Munitions Characteristics

All missiles seek to damage a ship target, usually by penetration and warhead detonation

to render that target inoperable. Most munitions systems feature some sort of explosive

surrounded with a casing. Projectiles, blast, perforation and fire are common damage

mechanisms. In extreme cases, nuclear and chemical means are used.

32

Page 40: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

2.2.2 Warhead Characterization

As a means of defeating cruise missile systems, fragmenting warheads delivered by

surface-to-air missiles are considered. Important parameters considered include fragment

weight, shape and velocity distributions.

Actual characteristics of surface-to-air warheads are classified. In general, however, they

operate by the same principles, albeit in a smaller way, as the systems addressed in

Section 1.1.1.5. In anti-air systems, fragment sizes range from less than 1 grain

(1/7000Ib) to greater than 1000 grains (0.141b). Fragments could be preformed in the

shape of rods or cubes, or randomly shaped. Preformed fragments are usually all

constant in size, while size distributions of random fragments vary. Fragment velocities

vary, and in some cases, velocities greater than 15,000 ft/sec are possible.

2.3 ff_an imization

The trade off and optimization phase of functional analysis presents the means in which

the requirements are met. At this point, the actual systems and their components are

identified. Existing, or postulated, systems are being analyzed, and the design

characteristics are set by outside considerations. To analyze a generic missile system,

the characteristics should be based on existing systems.

Table 1 presents a listing of the most prevalent systems currently in service. System and

performance characteristics are listed, based on information found in Jane’s Naval

Weapons Systems , Jane's Air Launched Weapons, and The Naval Institute Guides to

World Naval Weapons Systems and The Soviet Navy. Flight profiles and control

characteristics are not presented here, due to the fact that they are not usually available in

open literature.

This table does not give any indication of the probability of encountering a given system.

Thus, some systems that are produced by, and/or exported to, potentially hostile nations

(SS-N-22, SS-N-2, Exocet, Otomat) would carry more weight. Likewise, some systems

(SS-N-7, AS-7) have not been produced or exported in large numbers, or are nearing

obsolescence, and will carry less weight. A U.S. missile, Harpoon, is included as a

potential threat as it has been extensively exported.

33

Page 41: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

ANTI-SHIP CRUISE MISSILES

Maximum Cruise

Name Launch Length Range Speed __ (origin) Piatiorm(s) mit) Guidance ton (nm) Propulsion mach Warhead

Harpoon (USA) ship, air,sub |3.8 ( 12.5)| inertial,active radar | 240 (130) turbojet 0.9 SAP

Exocet (France) ship,air,sub | 5.8 (19.0)| inertial, activeradar | 50 (27) solid rocket 0.9 SAP

Silkworm (PRC) ship,land [7.4 (24.1) active radar 100 (54) turbojet 0.9 HE

801/802 (PRC) ship 5.8 (19.0)| inertial, active radar | 40(22) | solid rocket/turbojet| 0.9 SAP

C-101 (PRC) ship, land, air| 6.5 (21.3)| inertial, activeradar | 45 (24) ramjet 2.0 SAP

C-201 (PRC) ship,land | 7.4 (24.1) active radar 150 (80) turbojet 0.9 SAP

ANS (France) ship,air,sub | 5.7 (18.7)|} inertial, active radar | 180 (97) rocket-ramjet 2.5 SAP

Otomat (Italy) ship,land |4.6(15.1)| inertial, active radar | 160 (86) turbojet 0.9 HE

SS-N-2 Styx (Russia) ship,land | 5.8 (19,0) active radar 85 (46) [liquid rocket/jurbojeq 0.9 HE

SS-N-9 Siren (Russia) ship,sub | 8.8 (29.0)/ inertial, active radar | 111 (60) solid rocket 0.9 nuclear,HE

SS-N-12 Sandbox (Russia) ship,sub {11.7 (38.4) inertial, active radar | 550 (296) turbojet 1.7 nuclear, HE

SS-N-7 Starbright (Russia) ship,sub | 6.5 (21.3) active radar 64 (35) solid rocket 0.9 nuclear, HE

SS-N-19 Shipwreck (Russia){ ship,sub [10.0 (32.8) inertial, active radar | 550 (296) turbojet 1.6 nuclear, HE

SS-N-22 Sunburn (Russia) ship 9.4 (30.7)] inertial, active radar |] 90 (48) solid rocket 2.0 nuclear, HE

SS-N-25 (Russia) ship 3.8 (12.4) inertial, active radar | 130 (70) turbojet 0.9 SAP

Kormoran (Germany) air 4.4 (14.4)| inertial, active radar | 30 (16) solid rocket 0.9 HE/projectiles

AS-4 Kitchen (Russia) air 114.3 (37.1) inertial, active radar | 400 (215) liquid rocket 2.5-3.5 nuclear, HE

AS-5 Kelt (Russia) air 8.5(27.8)| inertial, active radar | 326 (175) liquid rocket 0.9-1.2 HE

AS-6 Kingfish (Russia) air 10.5 (34.5] inertial, active radar | 300 (162) turbojet? 2.5-3.5 nuclear, HE

AS-9 Kyle (Russia) air 6.0 (19.7)| _ passive radar 90 (49) __ liquid rocket 3.0 HE

AS-11 Kilter (Russia) air 4.8 (15.7)| inertial, passive radar| 70 (38) solid rocket 4.0 | HE blast/fragment

AS-12 Kegler (Russia) air 4,2 (13.8)| inertial, passive radar| 25 (13.5) solid rocket 1.0 | HE blast/fragment

AS-13 Kingbolt (Russia) air 5.1 (16.7) TV-command 90 (48.5) solid rocket 0.8 HE

AS-15 Kent (Russia) air, Jand = |7.1(23.3)] inertial, TERCOM [3000 (1617) turbofan 0.8 nuclear, HE

AS-16 Kickback (Russia) air 4.8 (15.7)| inertial, active radar | 150 (80) solid rocket 5.0 nuclear, HE

AS-17 Krypton (Russia) air 4.7 (15.4)| inertial, active radar | 50(27) | solid rocket/ramjet {| 3.0 [HE blast/fragment

Based on this table, certain trends are seen in characteristics. These trends are used to

establish the characteristics for a generic cruise missile system to be analyzed in this

study. The characteristics for this missile, designated Viper, are presented in Table 2.

34

Page 42: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 2. Characteristi f A Generic Cruise Missil stem

Name SS-N-27/AS-20 Viper

Country of Origin |Russia

10c 1997

Postulated Users |expected to be exported

Launch Platforms |SS-N-27: box launched: Kuznetsov (8 rounds)

Slava (8), Neustrashimyy (4)

tube launched: Akula (8), Sierra (8)

AS-20: Tu-22M Backfire (8), Tu-160 Blackjack (12)

Su-24 Fencer (2)

Length 4.06 m (160") Diameter body: 0.39 m (15.5")

span: 0.96 m (37.6")

Guidance muidcourse : inertial

terminal: active Pulse Doppler radar

Controls cruciform fins, electric driven

Speed max: Mach 0.8 at sea level

Range 100 km (60 nm)

Propulsion turbojet

Flight Profile sea-skimmer, possible pop-up maneuever

Warhead semi-armor piercing, HE/fragmentation

explosive weight 200 kg (440 Ib) Origin: Russia 1s chosen as the producer, due to the fact that Russian industry has the

most substantial history in designing and producing cruise missiles. In recent years, this

experience has been accompanied by an increasingly aggressive attempt to export these

systems.

Launch Platform: Most common systems are capable of being launched from a variety of

platforms. In the case of the Viper, it is capable of being carried in box launchers, by

medium to large surface ships, on underwing pylons of ground attack aircraft, in the

internal weapons bays of medium bombers, and the torpedo tubes of attack submarines.

Dimensions: The missile should be capable of fitting onto the pylons of an attack

aircraft. The diameter is dictated by the fact that the missile may be launched from

canisters or torpedo tubes. Standard Russian torpedo tubes are 53 cm (20.9") in diameter.

Propulsion: Turbojets allow for longer ranges, and are more flexible. Solid rockets may

be used by more systems in Table 1, but turbojets allow for a better presentation of

vulnerability principles.

35

Page 43: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Speed: Most turbojets travel in the high subsonic range. This speed is high enough to

make detection and interception difficult. Subsonic speed also allows for the airframe

and intake to be relatively simple in design.

Guidance system: Most systems in Table 1 use a form of inertial guidance and terminal

active radar. Pulse-Doppler radars are generally more effective than pulsed systems.

Control System: Unclassified sources do not identify the internal structure of most

missiles. Usually, hydraulic systems or electric motors are used to adjust the attitude of

the control fins. Hydraulic systems require a set of pumps, reservoirs and fluid-filled

lines. Electric systems are less complicated, with motors and sets of gears being used to

rotate shafts that are attached to the fins. Both types of systems are equally effective.

Thus, the decision to include an electric system in the Viper was arbitrary. The fin

configuration is similar to the arrangement on Harpoon, SS-N-25, or Exocet. This allows

for high maneuverability at high subsonic speed.

Munitions: The Viper is fitted with a semi-armor piercing warhead because the more

common systems use them. As shown in Table 1, many Russian systems have nuclear

options. It is extremely likely that export versions will not have this option.

To defeat the Viper, a naturally fragmenting warhead was chosen. Fragments were

chosen as being cube-shaped, with sizes varying from 15 grains to 1000 grains.

Velocities vary from 3000 ft/sec to 15,000 ft/sec. This selection represents existing

warheads and allows for a more general representation of the Viper's vulnerability.

2.4 Conclusion

Functional Analysis has been used to determine which systems and components need to

be addressed from a vulnerability standpoint. To demonstrate this point, the

characteristics of a generic cruise missile, and a means to defeat it, have been defined.

These are based on systems that are currently in use. However, it is expected that these

systems will remain viable for the foreseeable future.

36

Page 44: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

3.0 Failure Analysis

Examining the ways in which a missile system can fail is crucial to determining its

vulnerability . There are two ways that system failure can be viewed. In the first case,

the failure of individual components can be traced up to the ultimate effect on the system

as a whole. Alternately, the overall effect (usually "mission failure") could serve as the

starting point. Subsequent steps involve identifying the cause and effect relations that

lead up to that point. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Fault Tree

Analysis (FTA) are used, respectively, for each of these approaches.

3.1 ilure M nd Effectiven n is (FMEA

The FMEA identifies the relationship between each possible type of individual

component or subsystem failure mode and performance of essential functions. The

FMEA takes a bottom-up approach by identifying all possible failure modes of a

component or subsystem (as identified by functional analysis) and determines the effects

of each failure mode upon the capability to perform its functions. Typical failure modes

include premature operation, failure to operate, failure to cease operation, failure during

operation and degraded operation.

In the case of a cruise missile, the FMEA specifies the various ways in which the target

can fail to maintain controlled flight or fail to perform its mission. Loss of, or at least

serious degradation of, structural integrity, lift, power, control, or mission essential

equipment constitute the failure modes.

The FMEA for the Viper, for a mission kill is presented in Table 3. The FMEA takes

into account the fact the missile is being intercepted in the later stages of its flight profile.

The warhead is armed and the on-board radar is being used for guidance. These

conditions reflect the fact that the threats used against the missile, fragments from a

surface-to-air missile, are being launched from the missile's intended target.

Kill levels denote the level of performance degradation for the system. For cruise

missiles, two attrition kill levels, mission and recognizable, are usually considered.

Mission kill, the less severe level, is concerned with preventing the missile from

completing its mission. Recognizable kill involves identifying missile destruction within

a very short (1-2 second) time frame.

37

Page 45: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

yobue] ssiw

Aew ojissiyy

90S Of

UIYNM ISO] ISNIYL

JeqWeYS JOYSNquios 0} MO}

Jory

‘eBues peseeioeg

(ze ‘jnoewe]|4

‘einsseld jo

sso] 9]e1]6Ueg

JEQqWweYD jen4

OSGEL UoIsjndoig

o9rl osrl Orr!

Jequieyo Joysnqwoo

oor

yoGie) ssiw

Aew ajissiy

D8S O}

UIYWM }SO]

ISMYL 0}

MO}} [en}

O6E} ‘eBues

peseei9eq (Ze

‘jnoewe}|4 ‘einssaid

jo sso7

einyound S@U!]

|eN4 OVE}

UOlsjndolg

yoGue} ssiw

Aew oyissiy

90S S

UIYWM JSO|

JsMIUL uolNsnqwoo

soqueuy ‘e6ued

peseeloeq (We

ebewep

oeuibue jeuejyy

jo uondrusiq

uolesOped JOISNQWOD

OZZL__UOIsindolg

yobue] ssiw

Aew eyIssi

99S O|

UIYWM SO}

JsMuyL juawyedwos

eulbue efeyeeig

sepejg JojoY

‘ebuel peseeioeg

(ze ebewep sulbue

jeuse}y| ul

syoe[go ubiel04

jeinyoes4 JOSSOIGWOD

OG}

UOoIsindoig

yoGuey ssiw

Aew ayissiy

UIW | UI

JSO} SMU

-eBues peseei0eg

(ae ebewep euibue

jeus9e}U] uoHeoqn]

jo sso}

uonejeuey

‘Assy dwnd

|iO OSLL

uolsindalg

yoGue} ssiw

Aew ejissip

UILU | UIYYM

SO] ISMIYL

Ayyiqeys ‘e6ued

peseeiseq (Ae

ebewep eulbue

jeuejuy WeYS

10}O/ jo

SSO} einyoes{

yUNOW JUO14

O9OL UOIsindolg

yobue) ssiw

Aew eissip

UILW | UIUYM

YSOj ISM

-eBued peseeiseg

(Qe eGewep suibve

jeuiejy uol}eIUQn|

JO sso}

udiyesjeued Bury

yes 10

OLL| uoisjndoig

Ayyiqeys O91}

yeGiey ssiw

Aew alissiyy

UI

| UIUJIM

JSO} SMU

YEYS 10}OJ

JO SSO}

OSOl ‘e6ues

peseei2eq (QE

eGewep euiBue

jeuejyy ‘uoHeougn}

}O sso}

uolyesjeueg Buueeg

juol4 OPO}L

UOoIsjndolg

yoGue) ssiw

Aew essiyy

DES G UUM

ISO] SMI

‘eBues peseei0eg

(ve ‘jnoewe4

uonseBuy jen4

uolnesoped ONG

[4] AY

OOSL UOIsjndolg

ASNOdS3Y

FJISSIN = ALIVOLLIYD

AISNOdS3Y¥ WALSAS

104443 SYN1V4

AOVANVG

INSNOdWOO

WALSAS

TU

NOISSIW WOd

VAWS - HAdIA

-LADYVL

({ JO | a8ed) WAISKS

SSSI OSM)

Y IOI SISA[RUY Stagg

Puy Spo

OMpiey “¢ GEL,

38

Page 46: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

ebewep ejeAes

Buin

1464 pepesbeq

v Ayqeis

‘yy Jo

sso7 10

‘sso Buy,

UONEIOPOG pleogieys

seddn OzroO

eunyonis

eBewep elenes

BulAA 1y6i4

pepeibeg v

Ayqeis ‘yy

Jo sso7F

20 ‘sso

Buin, UONesIOpPed

Uod 4eddn

OlPO suNjonNS

“ (2)€

P a“

osey “

(2)e .

Pi Over

. (ee

Pi “

O€er “

(ze m

m Ozer

. (Ze

. “

Oler .

(z)€ "

a o0er

. FAT

“ Pi

O61 “

(2)e r

uoysebuy jen4

Osty .

(zee .

UWSGZE 4

OLLY .

(6z)€ mi

uUWOGE .

O9lP /

(z2)€ .

UW SGZE

OSiP .

(Sze “

UW OOE

Orly “

(zz) “

UIUG/S Oey

2 (oz)e

“ UWOSZ

. Ozly

a (Ze

P UW

GZS ow

00lr yobiey

ssiw Aew

ess

= (SLE

. uO’?

OOLy ‘e6ues

peseeioeg jsniy}

JO SSO}

NoewWe]-4 [UIYYM

JON} JO

SSO} uoljesjoued

jen4 XxXxXp

uoisjndoig

yeGie} ssiw

Aew ajissiyy

UIWW | UlYYM

ISO] ISN

Ayyiqeis ‘ebues

peseeioegq (QE

ebewep eulbue

jeuse}U| yeys

10}O1 jo

sso7} UOI}BsJOUGd

Buueeg seey

O/p} udlsjndoly

JOQWEYS JOJSNQwWOS

yobie; ssiw

Aew eyissiy

DES O}

UIYIM JSO]

ISMIYL O}

MO}} [eNy

Ozrk ‘eBues

peseeioeg (Ze

‘jnoewe|4 Jein6Bes

jo sso}

voljesjoued S]OMJUOD

JON OLPL

UdIsjndoldg

ASNOdS3y SISSIN

= ALAVOLLIYD

ASNOdSsAY WALSAS

103443 aYNTIVA

SOVAVG

LNANOdNOO

WALSAS

(L JO 7

aded) THAISAG

Sissy ost)

WY JO]

SISATCUY Slog PUY

Sopopy allie]

“¢ o[quy,

39

Page 47: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

wsiueyoow Joyenjoy

146i} pepesbeq

SYOO] Ul}

|O1]UOD jeusejul

0} eHeweg

uonesjeued Hog

seddn o1ze

= jouyuon

yeyus uldg

146} pepeibeq

Ayiqeys jo

sso] sso

Ul4 JEBYS

pleOMe]S 1eEMOTOPIE

Jo1jU0D

yeys uly

146i} pepes6eqg

Ayyjiqeis yo

sso7 SSO}

U4 Jeeys

YOd JOMOTOELE

jouju0D

yeys uly

1461) pepesbeg

Ajijiqeys jo

sso> SSO]

Ul4 seeyS

= pueogiejgueddn

Ooze =

jouyuon

YWEUS Ul

146i} pepesbeq

Ayijiqeys jo

Sso7 SSO]

Ul4 JOYS

Uod Jedd

OLLE |o4uoD

eGbewep e1eaes

ul4 1461}

pepei6eqg Ayyiqeys

jo SSO7

JO ‘SSOj

Ul4 UONCIONSG

PILOQIEIS JAMO]

OPOE jo1U0D

ebewep e1eaes

uly 1y6uy

pepesb6eq Ayiqeys

jo sso]

40 ‘sso|

Ul4 UON}eIOYed

HOdg JOEMOTOEOE

[01U0D

ebewep e1eAes

uly 145i}

pepesbeg Ayyiqeys

jo sso}

JO ‘ssoj

Uly UONeIOUeYg

pseoqieys ieddy

ozoe jo1uog

ebewep eieaes

ul4 \yBuy

pepesbog Ayiqeys

jo Ssso7

40 ‘sSoj

Ul4 UOI}eJOpOd

yod Jeddyn

OLE

=: |oujuon

eGewep eseAes

Bul

464

pepeibeq Ayiqeys

‘y1] }o

sso7 40

‘sso] Bul,

UOIeIOped pleoqgieys

JeMO] OPO

s’uNONIS

ebewep eiees

Bui

1464 pepes6eqg

Ayyiqeys ‘yl]

Jo sso}

10 ‘ssoj

BUIAA UOI}EJOLOq

Od JMO]

O€PO euNnjoNS

ASNOdS3y SUSSIN

=ALIIVOLUYO ASNOdS3Y WALSAS

41035445 SHNT1IVS

ADVWVG

ININOdWNOO

WALSAS

(L JO ¢

Bded) WISAS JISsyy

sitll) Y

JO.] SISATeUY

Sloojq PUY

SOpOo|y aNjiey

¢ oqe]

40

Page 48: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

peyesoueb vonnjos

yjnwize eissiw

Jo JUBWEINSeEW ON

JOJBWOlE|Bd0VY

yoGue) ssiw

Aew ellssipy

(ele eouepin6

eyeunsoeu; =

‘sjuewnujsul 0}

ebeweg

uolyesJeUued yeseye]

Oc}9 soURpINs

eure, oylssiw

peyeseue6 uoijnjos

jO JuUSWeINSeEW

ON JeEWOIE|}ED0y

ye6ie) ssi

Aew ejissiy]

(eye eouepin6

eyeunsoeuj = =—s

‘ sjuewunujsul 0}

eheweg

uoljesjeUued jeulpnyHuo7]

OL }9

souRepins

suojenjoy OL

yobue} ssw

Aew ajissiy

jquyuco meA

yoOIdoyny -[02}U09

JO SSO}

(ze /\\ou/youd

jo sso7

jeubis jo

sso7 SB9URIOAGS

WOl4 OIA

OSSE ouju0D

8liM Joyenpy

146i) pepes6eg

v SHIO}

Ulf [OUJUOD

jeubis jo

sso7> BOURIOABS

PJEOMGIE}S JOMOTOPEE

01}U0D

81M Joyenoy

yi} pepesbeq

? SYOO}

Ul} [QIJUOD

jeubis jo

sso7 BOURIOABS

WOdg JeEMOT

OEE

jau}u0D

OM

Joyenjpy 1461)

pepesbaq v

SIO} Ul}

|01]U0D yeuBis

jo sso7q

BDUBIBAeS pleOgieys

seddn OZEE

= oyun

B1IM J0yeNOY

146} pepesbeq

v SHOOJ

Ulj [O1JUOD

jeuBis jo

sso7 QIUBIOASS

ywodg seddn

oL1EE joujuos

wsiueyoew soyenjoy

146} pepesGag

v S4OO}

Ul} ]O1JUOD

jeuiajyul 0}

ebeweg

udveeUusg

pieogie}S JOMO]OPZE

JoujU0D

wsiueyoow Joyenjoy

y4y6u) pepes6eq

v SOO}

Ul} JOIJVOD

jeusequ! 0}

ebeweg

UONE1EUed

UOYg 1EMO]TOEZE

jojU09

wsiueyoow soyenyoy

146i) pepes6eq

v SYOO|

Ul} [OUJUOD

jeusaju! 0}

eGeweg

uoleseueg

pieoqiesueddnoeze

jomuog

ASNOdS3HY FUSSIN

= ALITVOLLIYS

ASNOdSaY WALSAS

104444 SYNTIVA

ASVWVG

LNSNOdWOO

WALSAS

(L JO p

added) THSISAS

SISSY OSIM)

Y JO,J

SISATBUY Sldajfq

Puy Sapo|

ainjiey “¢

oqel

41

Page 49: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

yobre; ssiw

Aew eyissiyy

*yOR1} JO

SSOF}

jebie, ssiw

ABW elISSIN

‘yOV4} JO

SSO7

jebiey ssiw

Aew ej!ssiw

je6se) ssiw

Aew sjissiyy

yobie} ssiw

Aew aylssip

yobie; ssiw

Aew oIssiy

yeGie) ssiw

Aew ejissiyy

ye6ue} ssiws

Aew eyissiyy

yobue} ssiw

Ae

ey!ssiy

(Ze

(ge

(ze

(2)

(Ze

(ze

(ele

(eve

(ele

Wwejshs

@AUP BUUBIUE

jO SSO]

jeuBis Buryorsy

eyissiw jo

‘ssoj Jo

‘uonepesbaq

souepin

jq1jUoo jo

sso7

eouepinB (o1ju0d

jo sso]

souepinG jo1jU09

jO SSO7>

souepinG \o1u09

jo sso7

peyesoue6 uoijnjos

eouepinb eyeunooeu|

peyesoue6 uolnjos

eouepinG eyeunooeu|

peyesoueh uoinjos

eouepin6 eyeinsoeu|

wsjueyoew jo

Buryeaig 10

Burpwwer

ysip Bulaieoe

/Bunywsues

0; ebeweg

peyesoueb jou

volnjos 8DUePINS)

‘wejsds 0}

peijddns .emod

on

uolNnjos souepin6

on ‘synous

0} ebeweg

payeseued

jou jeuBls

joujuoy ‘waysks

0} paljddns

uamod on

jeuBbis [01jU09

ON ‘SUNDND

0} EHeWeEG

018Z O}

$906 jeubis

equesejoy ‘wsiueysew

jo Bulwwer

jues you

eByep uojnjeagje

‘yjnwize ‘eGued

eissiw

epnyiye syssiw

JO Juewainseew

oN ‘sjuewnsysul

0} ebeweqg

UOol}esjOUeg

uoiyesjeued

BDUBIOAGS

UOeieUued

BOUBIBARS

uolHeljeUuad

uolesjeusd

BOURIBABS

uolye1jeued

ONES BuuelUy

repey 0Z99

eoUepIND

eBuueUy JepeYy 0199

soUepIND

J9yNdWOD IWBiI4

Of JOMOd

‘@IM OLS9

eouepIND

Jeyndwoy

14614 00S9

eoUepINE

Jodojny 0]

J8MO0g ‘OJIN

O9S9 Ss9URPINS

JOIdoIny OSS9

eoUepPIND

401g

Saik5 0019

soURPINS

Jeyndwoy of

$18] 8W018|B90V WOs4"OdIM

OSL9 SOUBPINS

Jejewolejav0y

[eOUEA OL19

euepINE

ASNOdS3uy AISSIN

= ALIIVOLLIGS ASNOdS3Y WALSAS

41034443 SYN W

S

JOVAVG

LNANOdWOO

W3LSAS

(L JO ¢ aded)

WaysKG opIssipy

OSIM) Y

JO] SISA[RUY

SloojJq PUY

SOpopy ane]

“¢ qe

42

Page 50: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

pedoijsep eissiW

{ye} sweysAs

JO4juoo ‘eoueping,

‘Wey Swejsds

josjuoo ‘eouepins

yoGie} ssiw

Aew ejissiy

yebie} ssiw

Aew ejIssiw

*yOes) JO

SSOF

yoGse} ssiw

Aew ej!ssip

‘yoe} JO

SSO}

yebie} ssiw

Aew ojissiy

-49B1} jO

SSOT

yeGie; ssiw

Aew syissiyy

‘yYORd) JO

SSO7

yebue} ssiw

Aew ejissiyy

*4981} JO

SSO}

G

(ze

(ze

CAT

(Ze

(Ze

FATS

Ajainyewed SOyeUOJEp

peoweEy

swejshs pueoquo

0} 1eMod ON

sweyshks puezoquo

0} JeMod

oN

peyesoueh JOU

UOIINjOs eoUePINSS

yues jou

jeubis Huiyoesy

peulwueyep you

uoljeoo; yeGie]

ues jou

jeuBis Buiyoesy

epolw eAIeJel

JO PWSUEI}

Ul PBYydO}

10 ‘yues

jou yeubis

Buryoesy

ques jeuBbis

Buijoes oN

uoleUojep Oo}

pee] Aew

A®ioue jenpisey

J9MOd 911}98/8

JO SSO}

:S]]89 0}

eBeweg

JOMOd J11]98|8

JO SSOT

‘syinouio 0}

ebeweg

jues eyep

Guyyoe.y ON

wejsAs 0}

paijddns semod

on

}iNouI9 Yous

40 ‘payenjene

jou jeubis

‘Synod oy

ebeweg

YN

WOYS JO

‘peyeseueB jou

jeubis ‘SHNOHD

OF ebeweg

YWNINO WOYSs

JO ‘UOITSOd

Ul Ppeyx907

‘YOUMs 0}

ebeweG

jUues jou

jeubis sepey

‘syinouo 0}

ebeweq

uoiyesjeued

uolesjeued

uolyesjeued

BOURIBABS

@DUBIBAGS

uoljesjeUued

vonejeued

uoljesjeUued

VOoHeseaUuBd

soyentuyy peewem

OZIS suoNUNyy

Aeneg 0018

[ed1410e/4

yooig uORNqUISIG

OSLE 1eqUPe/y

seyNdwoy

of

sJepey woi4

‘BIN 0899

SOURPINS

sepey O|

J8MOd ‘AIM

0299 8OURPINE)

10SS890/ 4 Bjeg

Jepey 0999

eoUEPIND

1eOXQ Jepey

0G99 eoUEpIND

sexeidng

Jepey OF9Q

SOUEPINY)

JeyWsuel | 1epey

0699 eoUepIND

ASNOdS3Y AISSIN

= ALIVOLLIYSD ASNOdS3Y WALSAS

104443 SHN1NVSA

JOVAVG

LNANOdNOO

WALSAS

(L JO 9 o8ed) WHaISAG

STISSI OSIM)

VW JOg SISATEUY Stoosyq puy

Sopoyy aNprey “¢ [qe L

43

Page 51: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

"P9}9|dW09 eq

JOU PjNOS

UOISSILU YOIYM

Ul [eA]

84} 0}

pepesGep jou

si eQUeWOPE

BIISSIN :eunjie44OUINN

= G

“suBaWW JOU}O

Aq 10}

peyesuedWod eq

Ue

ing ‘AjjUeDIUBIs

pepesBep si

souRWUOPEd

BIISSIN :eunjie4

soley v

"BSIMJOUJO GiNjie4y

sOUIWY “JoHse}

WO

Wu (x)

JseE] Je

Si BISSILW pf} SINDDO

OINIey |EIUD

seunreg peo

jeuonipuog (x)E

‘uoissiw Buiyedwosd

jo (1°9

>) Ayiqeqoid

MO] “s}iwy

ejqejdecce puodeg

papeifep si souRWJOped

BISsIWy seine peo

Z

‘uoissiw Buyejdwoo

0} Joud

‘jy6ijj ul

peAoisep si

eyssipy :eunjie4

dIUdoljseyeD t

Ajoanyewieid yWnd10

Hurjsjdwoo

SEpOD AyeonUD

Oves oEezs

sesn4 YsMo

0¢zS

peAosep

eIssiyy ,

SEJEUOJEP PeElepAA

‘payeaijoe sesny

uolesjeUued fRWUOD

O1LZSG suoUNy

Ajeinyeweid uoneuojep

0} pee;

Aew efueyd

view peAoljsep

elISSIW L

SO}EUO]Ep PEO

yep

ABueue jenpisey

uolesjeUued PEOUJEAA

OV LG

SUOIUNW

Ajeanyewieid uoneuojep

Oo} pes;

Aew eBsey

J6\s00g peAojsep

SlISSIIN L

seyeuojep peewee

A6isue jenpisey

UOITE1}OUB PEeuJep

OELS sUuoMUNW

ASNOdS3HY ATISSIN

= ALIMVOLLIYDS ASNOdS3Y WALSAS

104443 SYNTIVA

ADVANVG

LNANOdNOO

W2ALSAS

(L JO |

aded) WaSKG

SISSY osttu.)

Y JO]

SISATeUY S}OOjJaq

PUY SOpopy

alley ¢ Ode.

Page 52: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The probability of each damage mode effect occurring is equal to the product of the

probability of a fragment hitting the component and the probability of that fragment

damaging the component. The probability of the fragment hitting the component is

dependent on fragment cloud density, fragment trajectory, and component size and

location. Component damage probabilities (Pgh) give a measure of the amount of

damage that a given component can withstand before being considered disabled. These

probabilities are relative to fragment size and velocity. The vulnerability analysis

(Section 4) accounts for these factors in determining the likelihood of component failure

(expressed in terms of vulnerable areas).

Each critical component has a reliability (expressed as a probability) associated with it,

and failure can be completely independent of damage mechanisms. Reliability values

may vary significantly, and proper determination would require detailed knowledge of

component design. A recommendation for future research involves taking into account

the effects of component reliability in failure analysis with regards to vulnerability.

A potential drawback of the FMEA involves the fact that it only presents the effects of

damaging individual components. In reality, many components are likely to be damaged

to some degree. For this reason, the FMEA should not be considered as a complete

measurement of a target's overall vulnerability.

In regards to failure modes for the propulsion system, cutting off the fuel flow or

damaging the internal engine components defeats the system. Defeating the system is

most likely to decrease the missile's range. However, if the missile is near its target when

the propulsion system is defeated, it may be able to complete its mission.

As listed in the FMEA, failure modes for the structural system are limited to removal of

the forward wings. Removal of one wing will affect the flight characteristics, yet the

control system should be able to compensate. Removal of multiple wings, on the other

hand, is likely to have significant effects on the missile’s lift and stability characteristics.

Damage to skin and structural members will adversely affect the missile’s performance.

Their exclusion from the FMEA, however, is due to the fact that damaging these

components is likely to be a secondary effect to damaging less ragged components.

45

Page 53: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The control system failure modes involve removing fins, damaging components, or

severing wires. As with the wings, disabling, or removing, one control surface merely

degrades performance. Disabling multiple surfaces is likely to result in serious effects on

the missile's flight worthiness. It is worth noting that severing only one wire (component

#3530) can defeat the whole system.

Defeating the guidance system involves damaging components, cutting off the power

supply, or cutting off the flow of tracking signals. In this case, all components are non-

redundant; each component is responsible for specific contributions to system

performance. Disabling one component is likely to bring the whole system down. This

system must be defeated at least 2 nm from its target. Otherwise, the missile will

continue its course and "glide” into its target.

The electrical system provides power to all of the other systems on board the missile.

Thus, disabling the components in this system disables the other systems as well.

In order for the munitions system to be defeated, the warhead must be detonated at some

distance from the target. For this to happen, the explosive charges must be provided

with sufficient energy (from the penetrating fragments) to detonate, or the circuit that

controls fusing must be closed prematurely. The circuit can be closed by accounting for

the fact that the crush fuses are designed to operate by being destroyed (by hitting a hard

surface on the target). Thus, hitting the fuses with a hard fragment should have similar

effects.

3.2 Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

Another way of evaluating the failure modes for the Viper is through fault tree analysis

(FTA). Although this method is not as descriptive (on a component level) as the FMEA,

redundancy and relations between components are more Clearly defined. Fault tree

analysis is a top down approach that starts by assuming an undesired event has occurred

and then proceeds with a determination of which combination of preceding events could

have caused it.

46

Page 54: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The fault tree analysis of the cruise missile begins with the objective of the vulnerability

analyst: keep the missile from seriously damaging its target. The first level is shown in

Figure 13. As can be seen, this fault/objective can be accomplished by defeating any of

the major systems. In fact, with the exception of the warhead system, disabling the

system will result in defeating the missile. In the case of the warhead, merely disabling

the system may not be sufficient to prevent serious damage from occurring. Figures 14-

16 expand the fault tree. In these cases, failures associated with the guidance, propulsion,

control and warhead systems were evaluated. “Structural Breakup" refers to the fact that

the missile is damaged to such a degree that it disintegrates.

As with the FMEA, the fault tree analysis accounts for damage events only, with

probabilities of occurrence being determined in the vulnerability analysis (Section 4).

MISSION KILL -

MISSILE DOES NOT

DAMAGE TARGET

OR

] Cc 7 _ | WARHEAD PROPULSION CONTROL STRUCTURAL GUIDANCE

DETONATES EARLY SYSTEM FAILS SYSTEM FAILS BREAKUP SYSTEM FAILS

| ow ~~ ot ~

Figure 13: First Level Fault Tree For A Cruise Missile System

Figure 14 expands the first level fault tree by detailing the faults associated with the

guidance system. This system is dependent on the transmission of signals between

components. Disrupting communication between components will be sufficient to defeat

this system. This can be done by damaging the components or severing the connections

between components. Wiring is not generally redundant in missiles. All components

related to this system require electrical power. Thus, disabling the power source,

distributor or power lines will defeat the system (and most other systems as well).

47

Page 55: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

GUIDANCE SYSTEM FAILS

|

LOSS NO GUIDANCE GUIDANCE SIGNAL POWER LOST OF TRACK SIGNAL SIGNAL GENERATED NOT TRANSMITTED TO SYSTEM

OR

SENSOR WIRE FLIGHT WIRE WIRE DISTRIBUTION POWER SYSTEM|| FROM SENSOR COMPUTER BETWEEN AUTOPILOT} | FROM AUTOPILOT BATTERY || LNE(S

I COMPUTER AND AUTOPILOT

SEVERED

OR

jL

POWER ANTENNA SERVO TRANSMITTER] | EXCITER DUPLEXE DATA LINE DAMAGED DAMAGED DAMAGED DAMAGED DAMAGED] | PROCESSOR

SEVERED DAMAGED

Figure 14, Fault Tree Analysis For A Cruise Missile Guidance System

48

Page 56: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The control system is closely linked to the guidance system. This association is shown by

the inclusion of "guidance system fails" as an event in Figure 15. Again, electrical power

is necessary for this system to operate. Depending on the missile, an electrical system

failure will result in the control fins either becoming free-floating or Jocking in place. In

the case here, locking is the response. Either way, the missile becomes unable to correct

its attitude and departure from controlled flight results. Loss of one control surface

degrades the performance of the missile, but this can usually be compensated for, and the

missile is still able to maintain flight for a period of time. Loss of more than one fin,

however cannot be compensated for. Fin loss can be defined as physical removal or

disablement of the control mechanism. Physical removal comes about when a large

fragment, or group of fragments, perforates the skin to a point in which the effective

surface area becomes insignificant (usually about 25% removal). Also, if the shaft

connecting the fin to the actuator is sheared, the fin may simply fall off. The control

mechanism (consisting of motor and gears) is housed inside the actuator. Disabling this

component, or cutting off the signal to it, has the same effect as an electrical failure.

The fault tree analysis of the propulsion system is shown in Figure 16. In this case,

damaging components or disrupting the flow of fuel will result in a system failure. Fuel

ingestion occurs when fuel is injected into the forward end of the engine. This is more

likely to occur in the early stages of flight (when the tanks are more full). Even small

holes in the fuel system are likely to result in a loss of pressure, and subsequently,

flameout. Damaging the lubrication components is likely to result in the engine

overheating and seizing up. The effects of this occurrence are not instantaneous, but loss

of thrust could be expected in less than a minute in most cases.

Figure 17 details the faults associated with the warhead system. In this case, the warhead

can be detonated prematurely by penetrating the case with a sufficient amount of residual

energy to detonate the explosive charges inside, or by closing the fusing circuit by

activating the contact/crush fuses.

49

Page 57: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

~~

GUIDANCE SIGNAL NOT RECEIVED

CONTROL SYSTEM FAILS

OR

[POWER LOST TO SYSTEM

AND

PATH OF SIGNAL DISTRIBUTION POWER GUIDANCE BATTERY FROM AUTOPILOT BOX LINE(S SYSTEM Sis SEVERED pamaceo || OAMAGED]| sevede'n

FIRST FIN SECOND FIN REMOVED/DISABLED REMOVED/DISABLED

FIN WIRE TO FIN WIRE TO FINSHAFT| | ACTUATOR FINSHAFTL | ACTUATOR PERFORATED ACTUATOR] | PERFORATED ACTUATOR (>25% REMOVED)| [SHEARED | | DAMAGED } I severen | [025% REMOVED)| | SHEARED] | DAMAGED | [ cevency

Fi 15, Fault Tree Analysis For A ise Missil ntrol m

50

Page 58: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

~

|

PROPULSION

SYSTEM FAILS

OR

| | INTERNAT ENGINE FUEL FLAMEOUT DAMAGE INGESTION

[ | _t _LL i DAMAGE TO LOSS OF PERFORATION LOSS OF | Iocaroration| | PUNCTURE [ | PUNCTURE [1 PUNCTURE | | DAMAGE COMPRESSOR | TLUBRICATION/] | OF COMBUSTOR SHAFT T OF FUEL OF FUEL OF FUEL TO FUEL

BLADES COOLING CASE STABILITY TANK(S) LINE(S) CHAMBER | | CONTROLS

c —~)_ T_ ] DAMAGE DAMAGE DAMAGE DAMAGE DAMAGE TO OIL TO FRONT TO REAR TO ENGINE

SEAL RING | [70 OIL PUMP BEARING BEARING MOUNT

Figure 16. Fault Tree Analysis For A Cruise Missile Propulsion System

WARHEAD DETONATES EARLY

CRUSH FUSES] | MAIN CHARGE | | BOOSTER CHARG INITIATOR ACTIVATED DETONATED DETONATED DETONATED

Figure 17. Fault Tree Analysis For A Cruise Missile Warhead System

51

Page 59: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

3.3 Conclusion

By using Failure Analysis, the ways in which a cruise missile system can be defeated

have been identified. The likelihood of these failures occurring has not been quantified;

thus, the true measure of the vulnerability of the system has not been determined. To do

this, a Vulnerability Analysis of the missile system can be conducted.

4.0 Vulnerability Analysis

4.1 In ion

The functions associated with a cruise missile system have been determined. This has

lead to an identification of the components included in the system. Fault Analysis has

identified which components are critical to particular missile system operations. As a

final step, the vulnerability assessment involves applying the physical, functional, and

fault characteristics to determine the overall vulnerability of the system to hard kill

mechanisms for a particular kill definition.

"Target Vulnerability” is defined as the inability of a system to withstand damage. Every

system, and each component within that system, is vulnerable to a certain degree.

Furthermore, the vulnerability of each component contributes to the vulnerability of the

system.

Vulnerability assessments provide numerical values for quantifying the measures of

vulnerability. These measures include the conditional probability that the cruise missile

is killed given a random hit (Pkh). Another measure determines the vulnerable area (Av)

of the missile. These measures apply to both individual components and the missile as a

whole. The vulnerable area is defined as the product of the presented area in the plane

normal to the approach direction (shotline), and the Pkh. On a component level, Pkh is

essentially aspect independent, while Av is not. This method takes into account only

whether a component is functioning or not; degraded performance is usually not

considered.

52

Page 60: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

All assessments take into account characteristics of the threat (the means of damaging

the cruise missile) selected. These threats fall into the following categories: penetrating

projectiles or fragments, internally detonating HE projectiles and external

blast/fragmentation warheads.

Small-to-medium caliber gun launched projectiles may have internally detonating

warheads. In this case, evaluation using parallel shotlines is not valid. Taking this into

account, the actual presented area could be expanded and the results being applied to non-

explosive methods. Another method is assuming that detonations occur at selected

burstpoints. Each burstpoint is treated like a fragment, with the effects on nearby

components being evaluated. This evaluation determines whether the component and,

ultimately, the entire target is killed.

Externally detonating warheads feature blast fronts followed by fragments. Fragments

usually cause the most damage, although incendiary particles and blast can contribute

significantly as well. Thus, the vulnerability is analyzed in two steps. Vulnerability to

blast is usually expressed as an envelope about the target where the detonation of a

specific amount of explosive will result in a specified level of damage or kill to the target.

Although the dimensions of this envelope are determined from blast considerations, there

are fragment effects as well. Damage from blast is usually limited to airframe structural

and control surfaces. Fragments from externally detonating warheads are usually

uniformly ejected with divergent trajectories. Consequently, analysis using parallel

shotlines, at least near the target, is not valid. At sufficient distance, however, assuming

parallel shotlines gives results that are reasonably accurate.

A complete assessment takes into account the possibility of engaging the target at

various azimuth and elevation angles. Also, any assessment should take into account

vulnerability reduction concepts, such as redundancy, location, and shielding.

53

Page 61: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

4.2 Computer Programs For Vulnerability Analysis

A number of computer programs have been developed for assessing vulnerability. They

fall into three categories: shotline generators, vulnerable area routines, and internal burst

programs. The first two methods are used to evaluate fragments and penetrators. The

third method is used for internally detonating warheads. Lethality analysis, which

involves endgame routines, utilizes the output from these programs.

Shotline generators are used to provide the data for determining vulnerable areas.

Shotlines are obtained by superimposing a square grid over the surface area exposed at

specific azimuth and elevation values. Parallel shotlines are then traced perpendicularly

through each section of the grid. The program traces the path through the target, resulting

in a list of components, voids and fluids encountered. FASTGEN is the currently

accepted method of generating shotlines, with the results being stored in a line-of-sight

(LOS) file. As a prerequisite to running FASTGEN, a geometric model of the target is

developed. This model takes into account all components, describing them in plate or

volume mode. The actual construction is as a series of panels (described as

interconnected triangles), boxes, spheres, or cylinders.

A FASTGEN geometric model of the Viper (from an aspect of 45 degrees azimuth, 45

degrees elevation) is shown in Figures 18 and 19. Views of the propulsion, guidance and

control systems are shown in Figures 20-22. A listing of all the components that are

included in the model is shown in Table 4. Critical components are listed in italics.

54

Page 62: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Figure 18: Viper Cruise Missi

55

Page 63: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

y)

ex OO

KV

YON

] rM m : Wire Frame Of 1 I Fi

Figure 20: Viper Propulsion System

56

Page 64: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Figure 21: Vi ntrol m

Figure 22: Viper Guidance System

57

Page 65: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 4. mponents Incl In Viper FASTGEN Model

0010 RADOME 4110 FUEL SECTION] 0015 RADAR SECTION SKIN 4120 FUEL SECTION 2 0020 WARHEAD SECTION SKIN 4130 FUEL SECTION 3 0030 GUIDANCE/ELECTRONICS SKIN 4140 +FUEL SECTION 4 0040 PROPULSION SECTION SKIN 4150 FUEL SECTION 5 0050 CONTROL SECTION SKIN 4166 FUEL SECTION 6 0110 CONDUIT 4176 FUEL SECTION7 0130 AFT COVER PLATE 4180 FUEL SECTION 8 O410 UPPER PORT WING 4190 FUEL SECTION 9 0420 UPPER STARBOARD WING 4200 FUEL SECTION 10 0430 LOWER PORT WING 4210 FUEL SECTION II 0440 LOWER STARBOARD WING 4220 FUEL SECTION 12 1010 NOSE PIECE 4230 FUEL SECTION 13 1020 NOSEPIECE MOUNTING STUD 4240 FUEL SECTION i4 1030 AIR INLET HOUSING 4250 FUEL SECTION 15 1040 FRONT BEARING HOUSING 5110 WARHEAD CASE 1050 FRONT BEARING AND SHAFT SUPPORT 5120 WARHEAD MAIN CHARGE 1060 FRONT MOUNT 5130 WARHEAD BOOSTER CHARGE 1070 AXIAL COMPRESSOR ROTOR HOUSING 5140 WARHEAD INITIATOR CHARGE 1080 AXIAL COMPRESSOR ROTOR BLADES 5150 SAFE AND ARM DEVICE 1090 AXIAL COMPRESSOR HUB 5160 WIRE - AUTOPILOT TO SVA DEVICE 1100 AXIAL COMPRESSOR ROTOR DRIVE CONE 5170 WIRE - DISTRIBUTION BOX TO WARHEAD 1110 AIR INLET VANES $230 FORWARD PORT CRUSH FUSE 1120 STATOR REGION 5215 WIRE - FROM FWD PORT CRUSH FUSE 1130 COMPRESSOR HOUSING REAR SECTION 5220 FORWARD STARBOARD CRUSH FUSE

1140 FRONT SECTION OF SHAFT 5225 WIRE - FROMFWD STBD CRUSH FUSE 1150 OIL PUMP HOUSING ASSEMBLY 5230 UPPER PORT CRUSH FUSE 1160 FRONT BEARING ASSEMBLY 5235 WIRE - FROM UPPER PORT CRUSH FUSE 11760 OIL SEAL RING 5240 UPPER STARBOARD CRUSH F 1180 RADIAL COMPRESSOR HUB 5245 WIRE - FROM UPPER STBD HUSH FUSE 1190 RADIAL COMPRESSOR BLADES 6100 GYRO BLOCK 1200 RADIAL DIFFUSER 6110 LONGITUDINAL ACCELEROMETER 1210 AXIAL DIFFUSER 6120 LATERAL ACCELEROMETER 1220 COMBUSTOR HOUSING 6130 VERTICAL ACCELEROMETER 1230 PRIMARY AIR SWIRL VANE 6150 WIRE - ACCELEROMETERS TO COMPUTER 1240 COMBUSTOR SHELL 6500 FLIGHT COMPUTERIJINS 4250 REAR SHAFT SECTION 6510 WIRE - DIST. BLOCK TO COMPUTER 1260 AIR FLOW MIXER 6550 AUTOPILOT 1270 TURBINE INLET NOZZLE 6560 WIRE - DIST. BLOCK TO AUTOPILOT 1280 TURBINE COMBUSTOR VANES 6610 RADAR ANTENNA/WAVEGUIDE 1290 TURBINE AXIAL SHAFT 6620 RADAR ANTENNA SERVO 4300 TURBINE AXIAL BLADES 6630 RADAR TRANSMITTER 4310 EXHAUST DUCT 6640 RADAR EXCITER 1320 EXHAUST DUCT VANES 6656 RADAR DUPLEXER 1330 EXHAUST DUCT NOZZLE 6660 RADAR DATA PROCESSOR

1340 FUEL LINE 6670 WIRE - DISTRIBUTION BOX TO RADAR 1350 FUEL CHAMBER 6680 WIRE - RADAR TO FLIGHT COMPUTER 1360 STARTER CARTRIDGE PROPELLANT 7010 BULKHEAD - SENSOR WARHEAD 1370 STARTER CARTRIDGES (2) 7020 BULKHEAD- WARHEAD/GUIDANCE 1380 JUNCTION BOX 7030 BULKHEAD - GUIDANCE /PROPULSION 1390 FUELLINE, SECTION I 7040 BULKHEAD - PROPULSION/CONTROL 1400 FUELLINE, SECTION II 7100 | RADAR MOUNTING BULKHEAD 1410 ELECTRONIC FUEL CONTROL 7210 FORWARD WARHEAD BRACKET 1420. FUEL CONTROL VALVE 7220 AFT WARHEAD MOUNTING BRACKET 1430 BLEED AIR VALVE 7310 FORWARD FRAME - GUIDANCE SECTION 1440 FUEL LINE, START VALVE TO MAIN TANK 7320 AFT FRAME - GUIDANCE SECTION 1450 FUEL LINE, MAIN TANK TO FUEL VALVE 7410 FORWARD FRAME - PROPULSION 1460 FUEL LINE, FUEL VALVE TO 1160 E.F.L. (SECTION 1) 7420 FRAME It- PROPULSION SECTION 1470 REAR BEARINGS 7430 FRAME IIl- PROPULSION SECTION 1550 AIR INLET DUCT 7440 FRAME IV- PROPULSION SECTION 3010 UPPER PORT FIN 7450 AFT FRAME - PROPULSION SECTION 3020 UPPER STARBOARD FIN 7500 FRAME - CONTROL SECTION 3030 LOWER PORT FIN 7510 UPPER PORT ACTUATOR BRACKET 3040 LOWER STARBOARD FIN 7520 UPPER STBD ACTUATOR BRACKET 3310 UPPER PORT SHAFT 7530 LOWER PORT ACTUATOR BRACKET 3120 UPPER STARBOARD SHAFT 7540 LOWER STBD ACTUATOR BRACKET 3130 LOWER PORT SHAFT 8100 BATTERY 3146 LOWER STARBOARD SHAFT 8i50 DISTRIBUTION BOX 3210 UPPER PORT ACTUATOR

3220 UPPER STARBOARD ACTUATOR

3230 LOWER PORT ACTUATOR 3240 LOWER STARBOARD ACTUATOR 3310 WIRE - CONTROL, TO UPPER PORT ACTUATOR 3320 WIRE - CONTROL,TO UPPER STARBOARD ACTUATOR 3330 WIRE - CONTROL,TO LOWER PORT ACTUATOR 3340 WIRE - CONTROL,TO LOWER STARBOARD ACTUATOR 3530 WIRE - FROM AUTOPILOT AFT

58

Page 66: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Vulnerable area routines, such as COVART (Computation Of Vulnerable Area and

Repair Times) generate tables for single fragments or penetrators. Inputs to these

routines come from shotline generators, Pdh tables, penetration data and weapon

characteristic data. COVART takes into account mass and velocity decay as the fragment

proceeds along the shotline and utilizes penetration equations to simulate actual

conditions. The resulting product gives values for vulnerable areas for each grid cell. The

total vulnerable areas for components, systems or complete targets is the sum of all the

grid points that define the presented area in question.

Internal burst programs take into account burstpoints, with kill probability depending on

the relation of critical components to burstpoints.

Endgame programs require a vulnerability model to account for the terminal events in an

encounter between a HE warhead and the target. Evaluation usually includes warhead

detonation, blast propagation, fragment flyout, impact and penetration. The numerical

values for probability of kill (Pk) are determined based on encounter conditions, as well

as warhead and target characteristics. Usually, numerous orientations are considered,

with Px given as a function of distance.

4.3 ARTA ment of ise Missile T

As a final step in the analysis of the Viper cruise missile, a COVART assessment was

run. The final answer in the assessment is the vulnerable area (Av) of the components,

and the missile as a whole.

COVART is a FORTRAN program that determines vulnerable areas of targets that are

associated with specific levels of damage caused by kinetic energy penetrators, such as

warhead fragments. COVART has been used in the evaluation of manned aircraft and

land-based targets, as well as missiles. Determination of repair time is useful in aircraft

assessments, but is not applicable, and is usually omitted when missiles are being

analyzed.

59

Page 67: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The shotlines generated from the FASTGEN model, and found in the LOS file, are

essential for COVART assessments. Vulnerable areas are determined based on a

preselected fragment impact speed and weight matrix. Each penetrator is evaluated along

each shotline, and contributions made to target and component vulnerable areas are

determined. Weight and velocity reductions are taken into account as well. Kill

probabilities are determined as functions of threat impact (weight and velocity). The

component probabilities are then combined, to produce defeat probabilities for a given

threat against the entire target.

COVART results are useful from both lethality and survivability standpoints. From the

lethality side, COVART assessments are used to determine fusing schemes and warhead

designs. By evaluating a series of feasible targets, the most effective combination of

fusing aimpoints and warhead case and explosive characteristics, at given standoff

distances, can be determined. COVART assessments are also be used to determine the

survivability of friendly systems. By estimating the threats that may be encountered,

COVART analysis can be used as a tool in the design process for new aircraft and missile

systems.

Information required for a COVART evaluation includes: desired attack aspects,

definition of threats, kill levels and mission essential components, required outputs

(vulnerable areas, repair times in the case of aircraft), and forms of output. This

information is contained in a set of computer files. These include the BASIC file,

THREAT file, LOS file, JTYPE file, MV file, PDH file, and HEADER file.

The BASIC file contains guidelines for running COVART, such as dimensions, program

options, kill categories and aspects to be run. The BASIC file for the Viper assessment is

shown in Table 5. In this case, three common aspects (0° azimuth 0° elevation, 90°

azimuth 0° degree elevation, and 45° azimuth 45° elevation ) were run. Usually , aspects

are chosen in 30° or 45° increments in azimuth and elevation around the entire target.

Page 68: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The THREAT file contains input data for either fragments or projectiles, such as number

of fragment weights, shapes , basic dimensions and material types. The THREAT file

for the Viper assessment, entitled VIPER.FRAG, is shown in Table 6. In this case, seven

fragment sizes (15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 500, 1000 grains) and ten velocities (3000, 5000,

7000, 8000, 9000, 10000, 12000, 13000, 15000 feet/sec) were considered.

The LOS file includes the shotline information, and is output from FASTGEN.

The MV file provides information on multiply vulnerable component groups. The MV

file used in the Viper assessment is shown in Table 7. In this case, the control surfaces

(including fins, shafts, actuators and wires) and wings are multiply vulnerable. In the

case of the control surfaces, two surfaces must be disabled in order for the system to be

defeated. Disabling a surface, however, requires the defeat of only one component (fin,

actuator, shaft or wire). |

The PDH file is a numerical representation of on the Pdh curves for the vulnerable

components. The Pgh is expressed in terms of a function of impact weight and velocity.

Data is provided for each critical component at each kill level and velocity for a given

fragment weight. The Pgh curves represent the vulnerability of unshielded components.

Shielding by other components tends to reduce the energy of incoming fragments.

Typical Pgh curves for four component types; engine components, soft electronics,

battery and autopilot, are shown in Figure 23. The PDH file, which numerically

expresses the curves used in this assessment, is shown in Table 8.

The JTYPE file contains component information, such as identifying number, material

type, density ratio and pointers to Pdh tables. The JTYPE file used in this assessment is

shown in Table 9. Each line of this file gives information about a specific component.

The first column lists the component numbers (actually, vulnerable area names) of the

critical components, or is left blank (for non-critical components). The subsequent

columns list component number, component density (0-100 percent), vulnerable area

number, material type code, and applicable Pdh curve.

61

Page 69: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Information from the HEADER file is used to identify the output data specific for a given

target. This information usually consists of titles and headings.

44 Conclusion

The overall vulnerable area for the missile, and the vulnerable areas for the components

against single fragment impact are presented in Tables 10-12. Vulnerable areas for

individual components are listed for fragment sizes of 30, 120, 500 and 1000 grains.

Results for other sizes could be determined by interpolating these values. It should be

noted that, in reality, multiple fragments are likely to be encountered. Thus, the missile is

more vulnerable than these tables indicate.

The vulnerable areas for the 0° azimuth, 0° elevation aspect , which corresponds with the

missile coming in head-on, are shown in Table 10. At this aspect, presented areas are

small and shielding tends to protect most components. In fact, most critical components

would not be considered vulnerable. The radar components, however, are located in the

nose of the missile, where shielding has less of an effect. Since these components are

considered "soft" electronics, they would be relatively easy to defeat. Consequently,

disabling the guidance system is the only apparent means of defeating the missile from

this aspect.

The vulnerable areas for the 45° azimuth, 45° elevation aspect are shown in Table 11.

Compared to the results in Table 10, it can be seen that the missile and most components

have larger presented and vulnerable areas. Engine and fuel components appear to be the

most vulnerable at this aspect. As would be expected, larger fragments and higher

velocities are likely to cause more damage. Thus, defeating the propulsion system is the

most likely means of defeating the missile from this aspect.

It is apparent from this table that the multiply-vulnerable controls are not very vulnerable.

This is due, in part, to the fact that the components with the largest presented areas, the

control surfaces, are not considered vulnerable to single fragment impact. Smaller

components are vulnerable, but their overall contributions are small, due to small

presented areas and redundancy.

62

Page 70: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

The vulnerable areas for the 90° azimuth, 0° elevation aspect are shown in Table 12.

This aspect provides the largest presented area of the three views analyzed. Similarly,

the values for vulnerable areas are slightly higher than those in Tables 10 and 11. As was

the case for the 45° azimuth 45° elevation aspect, the fuel/propulsion and guidance

electronics are the most vulnerable components. The electrical components are also

vulnerable at this aspect. Since the electrical components are located near the autopilot

and flight computer, and just forward of the fuel and propulsion sections, the aft part of

the center section of the missile would be the best targeting location on this missile.

Again, the multiply-vulnerable controls are difficult to defeat. Defeating one control

surface is possible, but it is unlikely that a single fragment impact will disable two

surfaces.

In all views it is apparent that electronic or engine components are the most vulnerable

parts of a missile. Wires and cables are crucial for proper operation of the missile, yet

they are too small to be targeted. Warhead explosives are not very vulnerable, due to

the fact that penetrating the hard outer casing requires a great deal of energy.

According to the COVART results, redundancy makes the control system difficult to

defeat. How well a missile operates after one control surface has been defeated depends

on the feedback capabilities of the system. The FMEA should give consideration to this

fact. Also, location of control components would tend to make the control system seem

less vulnerable than it really is. This is due to the fact that COVART only accounts for

single fragment impacts and it is unlikely that components from two control surfaces will

be located along one shotline. |

The results presented in these tables should be viewed as a small part of a larger picture.

In a real encounter, a large number of fragments, and shotlines, would be involved. Asa

result, the vulnerable areas of a large number of components need to be taken into

account.

63

Page 71: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Generally speaking, the COVART assessment puts the results of the failure analysis in

perspective. Looking at the FMEA and FTA, it seemed relatively simple to disable a

missile by knocking out one component or severing one wire. While this conclusion is

accurate, the results of failure analysis account for vulnerability at the system level. By

taking into account component characteristics, sizes and locations, the COVART

assessment provides a quantification of vulnerability at a component level.

Existing methods of vulnerability analysis have limitations. In the future, analysis

methods need to take into account such real-world concerns as multiple fragment impact,

degraded mode operations, and secondary effects. Many of these limitations may be

overcome as computational capabilities increase.

Page 72: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 5: BASIC File For Viper Assessment

5 1 6 6 7 0 9 1 8 0 50

0 1 0 i 1 0 003

1 0 1 6 2 -12 99599.

1

TARGET Viper 0 0 90 6 45 45

20 FRAG SY¥S2:[WILK.SYSENG])VIPER.FRAG

21 JTYPE SYS2:[WILK.SYSENG]VIPER.JITYPE

22 MV SYS2:[WILK.SYSENG]VIPER.MV

23 PDH S$Y¥S2:[WILK.SYSENG]VIPER.PDH

ad TITLES SYS2:[WILK.SYSENG]VIPER.HEAD

Table 6: THREAT File For Viper Assessment

FRAG

-2 10 7 $9.0 200.0

3000 5000 7000 8000 90001000011000120001300015000

15 15 GRAIN FRAG

30 30 GRAIN FRAG

60 60 GRAIN FRAG

120 120 GRAIN FRAG

240 240 GRAIN FRAG

500 500 GRAIN FRAG

1000 1000 GRAIN FRAG

4140341403414034140341403414034140

1 5 .196 .196 1. 2 5 25 -25 1.

3 5 -3i -31 1.

4 5 -33 ~39 1.

5 6 -568 0.90 -66021

6 6 -82 0.0 -45732

7 6 1.16 0.0 ~32328

65

Page 73: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 7: MV File For Viper Assessment

MV

2 KILL CATEGORY 1 *GCONTROL=UPPORT.AND.UPSTAR.AND.LOPORT.AND.LOSTAR /2/4 *SUPPORT=FIN1I.OR.SHFT1.OR.ACT1.OR.WIREI *SUPSTAR=FIN2.OR.SHFT2.OR.ACT2.OR.WIRE2 *SLOPORT=FIN3.OR.SHFT3.OR.ACT3.OR.WIRE3

*SLOSTAR=FING.OR.SHFT4.OR.ACT4.OR.WIRE4 CFIN1I=3010 CFIN2=3020 CFIN3=3030

CFIN4=3040 CSHFT1=3110

CSHFT2=3120 CSHFT3=3130

CSHFT4=3140 CACT1I=3210 CACT2=3220

CACT2=3230 CACT4=3240

CWIRE1=3310 CWIRE2=3320

CWIRE3=3330 CWIRE4=3340

END END OF GROUP]

®GWING=0410.AND.0420.AND.0430.AND.0440 /2/4/ END END OF GROUP2

66

Page 74: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

= °o

—*~

° @

g &

12

2 co

Sgr

9 mB ° ty

o >

thertirtit

rte tirtitpdi

|

6 gr

. oT 9

j "6d ee "shoo

FRAGMENT VELOCITY (FT/SEC)

a. Engine Parts

1.0 >

0.8—

06—

Pdh — 04

02 4

~] 15 gr

Oe ee ney

FRAGMENT VELOCITY (FT/SEC)

c. Battery

1.0—— } = @

~—

7 1S 0.e—-

— Ser

. Oe

Pdh 4 0.4—

0.2mm

i

0 5000 10000 15000

FRAGMENT VELOCITY (FT/SEC)

b. Soft Electronics

9 °

° z

a @

@ 3°

& o

on

fris

lili

lita

liti

ls

purr erty

FRAGMENT VELOCITY (FT/SEC)

d. Autopilot

Figure 23: Typical Pdh Curves

67

Page 75: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 8: PDH File For Viper Assessment

PD

0.50000 2 2 0 28

i. 6. 12. 18. 24. 60.

1 9

1 LEENERG

0 ONONE

1 5.0 6 0

7 15 36 60 12601000 2 2 2 2 2 2

7200 O. 8100 1. 4950 0. 5525 1. 3450 0. 3900 1. 2520 0. 2780 1.

1750 0. 1950 1. 620 0. 700 1.

2 5.0 1 0 0

0 6

-900 01.500.082.500.225.000.586.500.798.00 1.0

3 0.1 7 1

1 2 5 15 30 661000 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1100 0. 1225 1. 495 0. 550 1. 215 0. 245 1. 125 0. 144 1.

20 0. $0 1. 65 0. 72°41. id 0. 17, 1.

4 0.1 1 0 1

0 2

0.06 00.07 1.0

5 0.05 6 i

1 5 15 30 60 120 5 4 2 2 2 2

305 .51 610 .70 900 .851200 .941510 1.

305 .71 610 .94 900 .981200 1. 305 .85 610 1. 305 .88 610 1.

305 .91 610 1. 0.0. 305 1.

6 0.05 1 0 0

0 6

-001 00.100.740.600.921.400.963.000.985.00 1.0

7 15.0 7 0

15 30 60 120 240 5001000 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

5310 05350 .279999 .793370 03410 .786400 .70

2375 62400 .274110 .7015790 01610 .282500 .790

1125 01150 .271600 .70 8090 0 835 .281010 .70

600 0 630 .27 755 .70

8 1.0 1 0 0

0 6

-350 02.000.103.000.185.000.2412.00.4232.0 1.9

9 0.05 5 0

15 30 60 1201000 3 3 3 3 2

390 0. 444 .777010 1.6 380 0. 423 .785013 1.0

376 0. 419 .813015 1.0 390 0. 412 .821010 1.0 360 0. 400 1.0

10 0.05 1 0 1

0 6

-001 00.020.410.040.500.080.600.160.681.66 1.0

11 3.0 6 1

5 15 30 60 1201000 3 3 3 3 3 3

213 0.0 242 .101510 1.0 173 0.0 193 .361210 1.0

111 0.0 124 .10 865 1.0 83 0.0 94 .45 616 1.0

65 0.0 72 .55 433 1.0 37 0.0 42 .67 155 1.0

12 3.0 1 ) 1

0 5

~06 00.070.250.150.500.600.77 5.0 1.0

13 06.05 6 1

1 5 15 30 60 120 5 4 2 2 2 2

300 .55 610 .73 915 ,851220 .921525 1.

300 .74 610 .92 915 .981220 1. 300 .82 610 1. 300 .86 610 1.

300 .90 610 1. 0 0. 300 1.

14 0.05 1 0 0

0 6

001 00.100.740.600.921.400.963.000.985.00 1.90

15 0.05 6 1

1 5 15 30 60 120 5 4 3 2 2 2

360 .40 600 .61 900 .771212 .981515 1.

engine comps

prim frag zone

engine ENERG

fuel line prim

frag zone

fuel line NRG

soft electron

primary frag

sft elect NRG

actuators

actuat. Eng.

wire primary

frag zone

wire Energ

crush Fuzes

crush Fuzes

Energy

electrical

primary frag zone

elect NRG

autopilot

68

Page 76: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 8: PIDH File For Viper Assessment (Continued)

300 .58 600 .85 900 .961200 1. 300 .73 690

300 .80 600 1. 300 .88 600 1. 0 0. 290

16 0.05 1 0 0

0 6

-002 01.000.763.000.843.000.896.000.967.00

17 10.0 6 1

15 30 60 120 2401000 4 4 4 4 4

2100 O. 310 .08 513 .131510 1. 100 .03 319

100 .08 3190 .15 513 .221300 1. 100 .13 310

100 .16 310 .41 513 .631090 1. 100 .37 310

18 10.0 1 0 0

0 4

0.50 01.400.108.000.6025.0 1.0

19 1.0 4 0

15 60 2401000 2 2 2 2

0 09999 0 0 09999 0 0 09999

20 15.0 7 0

15 30 60 120 240 5001000 2 2 2 2

3870 03955 1.02775 02850 1.01915 01984

955 01010 1.0 655 0 711 1.0 455 0 486

21 10.90 7 0

15 30 60 120 240 5001000 2 2 2 2

1965 02160 .2512525 01690 .251200 01340

775 6 870 .25 635 0 705 .25 545 0 600

22 300.9 2 0

5001000 2 2

5875 0.06480 .255000 0.05513 .29

23 10.0 2 0

151000 2 2

50 0 1111.00 50 0 1111.00

24 10.0 7 0

15 30 60 120 250 5001000 2 3 4 4

8950 09999 .057760 09100 .159999 .31

6815 08120 .209200 .459999 .705950 07120

5050 07120 .658200 .869200 .899999 .90

5025 06210 .757120 .889999 .913775 05130

25 10.0 7 0

15 30 60 120 240 §00106000 2 2 2 2 3888 05550 1.02400 03900 1.01965 02788

980 01400 1.0 675 0975 1.0 485 0 680

26 0.0 1 0 0

1. 4

1.25 0.02.53 .555.37 .8915.8 1.0

27 15.0 7 0

15 30 60 120 250 5001000 2 2 2 2

4175 04220 1.02775 02850 1.01875 01920

955 01025 1.0 628 0 655 1.0 485 0 513

28 15.0 7 0

15 30 60 120 250 §$001000 2 2 2 2

675 0 700 .85 555 0 590 .84 455 0 495

350 0 388 .83 331 0 355 .83 3190 0 330

-96 890

1.

1.0

4

-13 513

-25 $13

-75 513

0 0

2 2

1.01370

1.0

2 2

-25 945

-25

5 4

- 209200

- 706110

2 2

1.01390

1.0

2 2

1.01360

1.0

2 2

~-83 400

- 83

-161400

-4 1200

~-85 905

09999

01450

01040

4

-809999

-899999

2 01960

2 01415

6 435

25

-89

-94

1.0

- 83

primary

zone

frag

autoplt NRG

battery

primary

zone frag

battery NRG

wings/fins

blades

intake

act. Shafts

fuel

explosive

gyros

antenna

servo

dist.box

69

Page 77: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 9: JTYPE File For Viper Assessment

JTYPE

1 8 NON-CRIT 0010 100 227

0015 100 27 0020 100 27 0030 100 27 0040 100 27 0050 100 27 0110 100 27

0410 0410 100 37 19 0420 0420 100 47 #19 0430 0430 100 57 19 0440 0440 100 67 19

1010 07 28 1020 100 21 1030 100 28

1040 1040 100 712 1 1050 1050 100 812 1 1060 1060 100 912 1

1070 100 21 1080 1080 32101 20

1090 100 21 1100 100 21 1110 20 28 1120 25 28 1130 100 28 1140 100 2 6

1150 1150 100118 1 1160 1160 100126 1 1170 1170 100 1313 1

1180 100 24 1190 1190 25 1416 20

1200 25 28 1210 25 28

1220 1220 10015 3. 3 1230 100 24 1240 100 21 1250 100 25 1260 100 21 1270 100 23 1280 100 23 1290 100 25 1300 25 25 1310 100 21 1320 04 21 1330 100 21

1340 1340 100 16 1 3 1350 1350 100173 3

1360 79 27 1370 06 23 1380 60 21

1390 1390 2818 &@~ 3 1400 1400 2819 8 3 1410 1410 30208 5 1420 1420 100 21 8 ~ 3

1430 50 28 1440 1440 18 228 3 1450 2450 15 23 8 3 1460 1460 15 248 3 1470 1470 100 256 1 1550 1550 17 26 8 212 3010 3010 100 27 7 #19 3020 3020 100 28 7 19 3030 3030 100 29 7 19 3040 3040 10039 7 19 3110 3110 100 31 6 22 3120 3120 100 32 6 22 3130 3130 100 33 6 22 3140 3140 100 34 6 22 3220 3220 40 36 8 7 3230 3230 40378 7 3240 3240 4038 8 7 3310 3310 75 3918

70

Page 78: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Table 9: JTYPE File For Viper Asscssment_ (Continucd)

3320 3320 75° #4018 9 3330 3330 75° 4118 9 3340 3340 75 #4218 9 4100 4100 100 6954 23 4110 4110 100 7054 23 4120 4120 100 7154 23 4130 4130 100 7254 23 4140 4140 100 7354 23 4150 4150 100 7454 23 4160 4160 100 7554 23 4170 4170 10 7654 23 4180 4180 10 7754 23 4190 4190 10 7854 23 4200 4200 05 #7954 23 4210 4210 05 8054 23 4220 4220 O01 8154 23 4230 4230 O01 8254 23 4240 4240 01 8354 23 4250 4250 01 8454 23

5110 100 21 5120 5120 100 4315 24 5130 5130 90 4415 24 5140 5140 80 4515 24

5150 60 2 8 5160 75 218 5170 75 218

5210 5210 25 46 1 #11 5215 75 218

5220 5220 25°47 1 #11 5225 75 218

5230 5230 25 48 1 #11 5235 75 218

5240 5240 25 49 1 #11 5245 75 218

6100 6100 45 50 8 25 6110 6110 35 51 8 13 6120 6120 35 52 8 13 6130 6130 35 53 8 13 6150 6150 75 5418 3 6500 6500 40 55 8 13 6510 6510 75 5618 9 6550 6550 30 57 8 15 6560 6560 7S $818 9 6610 6610 100 5925 26 6620 6620 40 60 8 27 6630 6630 50 61 8 13 6640 6640 50 62 8 13 6650 6650 50 63 & 13 6660 6660 50 64 8 13 6670 6670 75 6518 ) 6680 6680 75 6618 9

7010 #100 22 7020 100 2 2 7030 100 2 2 7040 #100 2 2 7100 42100 2 2 7210 #100 2 2 7220 100 2 2 7310 #100 2 2 7320 100 2 2 7410 #100 2 2 7420 100 2 2 7430 100 2 2 7440 200 2 2

7450 100 2 2 7500 100 2 2 7510 100 2 2 7820 100 2 2 7530 100 2 2 7540 100 2 2

8100 8100 100 67 8 17 8150 8150 35 68 8 28

71

Page 79: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

OH3Z

OL

IVNOA

ST VIUY

ATAVHINTINA

¥o"O

OPoe

OudZ

OL

TVNOI

SI VIN

ATAVMINTNA

£o°o

ocoe

OW4aZ

OL

WWNOT

SI VAN

ATAVHININA

90°90 azote

Ou92Z

OL

IVNOA

SI VAUY

ATAVHININA

£0°0

otoe

OW4a2

OL

TYNOA

CI VANV

ATAVHININA

bh"

Oo osst

Ous2

OL

TVNOG

SI VIMY

ATAVAYAININA

0oo°o

OLot

OW¥3Z

OL

TYNOZI

SI WINN

ATAVYAINTNA

90°90 OFT

OU32

OL

IWNOA

SI VIUV

ATAVUININA

$o°0

oset

OU4FZ

OL INNA

SI VIUY

BIAVUYINTNA

bt°o

OPT

OU9Z

OL

IVNOA

SI

V3UV

ATAVHININA

fo0°o

OtHT

O442

OL

TNNOA

SI VAUV

ATAVHANINA

$0°o

OTrt

OW¥3Z

OL

TYNOA

SY VIN

ITAVUYININA

€o°o

OOFT

O49Z

OL

IVNOA

SI VAUV

JZIAVHAININA

60°0

Oot

OW49Z

OL

INASA

SI VAY

AIGVUININA

To0"0

os¢et

OudZ

OL

IWNOS

SY V3UY

ATAEVHININA

a0°Oo

Ovet

OuaZ

OL

TVNOI

SI VAYW

ATAVUININA

Leo

o7zt

OW43Z

OL

TWNOI

SI WAUW

ATAVHANTNA

tt°o

O6TT

OUdIZ

OL

IVNOD

SI VIN

AIGVHININA

00°90 OLTT

OU32

OL

TWNOD

SI VIR

JTAVHAININA

00°0

O9TT

OW3Z

OL

TYNOA

SI WAIYV

ATAVYININA

00°09 osTtT

OW4Z

OL

TWNDS

SI VAAN

ITEVUINTNA

6T°0

osot

O443Z

OL

IVNO3

SI VAIN

ATAVAININA

00°0

o90T

OW3Z

OL

TWNOA

SI VIAN

ATAVUANINA

oo0°Oo osoT

OW49Z

OL

IWNOA

SI VIUV

ATAVHAININA

00°90 Ovort

OW3Z

OL

TWNOAI

SI WINN

ATAVUSNINA

90°90 Oppo

O4492

OL

TWROA

SI WAU ATEVUANTNA

s0°o

otbo

OW4Z

OL

IWNOT

SI VAN

JTAVHININA

90°90 O7FO

O4¥32

OL

IVNOI

SI VWINV

ALIGVYININA

, £0°0o

oTeo

o00cT

OOOeCT

O00TT

OOOTT

0000T

0006

0008

O00c

000s

OOOE

Vauv

3WYN

(QNOD9S

Usd

L9dd)

Adds

LVIUNL

Q3LN9Saud

LININOdWNOD

NOISSIW

T TIIW

HOd

(L994

3UNNOS)

SVAUV

ATAVYANTNA

AIONIS

IWLNAIWNZUONI

LNANOGWOD

LONS

JFIONIS

NOTLWAG19

S3gu9aqa

0 “HLAWIZW

S$aqgu9aa

0 es LIISY

WOIVLLIV

b9°0O 69°

0 69°0

69°0O s9°0

s9°0

$9°0

S$9°*0 £9°0

oc°o0 OWHU4

NIVUS

OOOT

€9°0

0 b9°O

#9°0

’9°0

0 69°90

9° 0

T9°O

Lp-o

OVudd NIVYOS

O0G se°0

es" 0

€9°0

£9°0

§9°0

b9°0

£9°0

79-0

8S5°0 €b°

0 OWUd

NIVUD

OF7 se°o

95° 0

8S" 0 09°0

o9°0

09°90 09°90

gs°0

ss°0

Te°0

OVUd

NIVUSD

OZT st°o

€b°oO £s’°0

95°90 95°70

ts" 0 99°90

ss" 0

gba

€0°O

OVHd

NIVUD

09 set°o

st*o

cse°o TS°0

6S" 0

¥s°0

€s°0

z7s°0 ot"

O £070

OVUd

NIWYD

OF NOISSIW

oft’o Te"o

TE°O

ze°o

TE“ oO

Te°0

1e€°o o£°o

£270

€0°9

OV

NIWYS

ST T

T3I4N

OO0ST

OOOFT

O007T

OOOTT

O000T

0006

0008

o00L

000¢

ooo€

AYOOZLND

(QNOD3S

Had Lagd)

AAGdS

LVIYHL

WIM

(L494

FJuvNOS)

SWAUY

GTAVHININA

IVLOL

LONS

JZ IONIS

(Laga4a

3uvnds)

627°T

= VWA4NV

G2LNASZUd

IWLOL

NOILWAITA

$S$3Iqaoad

oO ‘HLAWIZY

Saguogaqa

oO =

LOAdSVY

HIVLILY

UONRATA

(0 “YINUNZY

(0: FOUTA JO

WAUISsISSY LUVAOD

JO SuNSOY

Ol OGL

72

Page 80: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

bo°O

bO°O

PO°O

bo'o

vo°o

60°O

ro" O

bao°o bo°o

z70°0 OWdd

NIVUSD

OO0T

ro'O

bO'O

FO°O

bo°o

bo'o

bO'O

’0°0

6O'O

60°O

zo°o

OVUa

NIVUS

006 z0°0

z70°0 z0°'O

£0°0O £0°"o

£0°0

£0°0O €9°O

z0°0

zo°0

DVU2

NIVYOD

O71 zo‘o

70°0

z0°O

zo'o

za°a

z70°0 z0°0o

z0°0

To"o

00°O

OWud

NIVUD

OF so°o

0899

OU9Z

OL IVNDI

SE WAYV

ATAVHANTNA

st‘o

0499

b2°0

r270

bZ°0

6z°"0 P20

pz°0

pz°O

pz-0

z7Z°0 9T"O

OvVuUd NIVUD

OOOT

bz°0

oz"o

ez°0

ez°

0 pz°o

vz°O

yz°o

bz*o

77°

0 SsTtT°o

OVud

NIVYO

OOS

00°0

at’o

oz'9

oz" 0

ov7' 0

T2°0

0z°0

6T°0

6T'O

90°90 OvuUd

NIVYD

OZ7T 00°O

00°90 0°90

Gt°o

LT’o

L1"O0O Lt"

0 ct"o

00°0

00°0

OVUd

NIWYO

O€ c$°0

0999

zo°0

z70°9O 70°90

70°0

z0°0

z0°0

z0°0O zo°"0

z0°0

t0°0

SVUd

NIVUD

COOT

z0°O

z0°0

70°0O z0°O

70°0

z0°0

z0°0

z70°0O z70°O

To"o

OVYd

NIVUOD

00S 00°°

z70'0 z0°0

zo°o

z0°o

z70°0 z0°O

Z0°O

z0°0

10°O0 OWua

NIVUOD

OZ

00°0

00'0

00°D

to°o

z0°'O 20°0

zo°o

z0°o

00°0

00°0

OVUd

NIVUD

OF z70°0

0S99

OUdZ

OL TWNOA

SI V3YV

3TOVuUaNTAA

9T°0

0999

or" 0

oft‘o oc"o

oc"o

of'o

oc‘o

oc"o

o€'o

oc’ a

Lz7°0 OVUA

NIVUD

OOOT

of°o

oc’o

ofc*o of£"o

of" 0O

oc’o

o£°a

oc-a

oc’o

97 °0

OVUs

NIVUD

005 oc"o

of"oO of°O

oc’ o

of’o

of*o

an) ac’o

62°90 61'0

OVYd

NIVYD

OZT of’o

o£'O

of£°O oft*o

oc’o

of£*O 67° 0

ez°0

97°0

00°0

OVUA

NIVUD

OF ec°o

0£99

OUd2Z OL

IWNSa

SI VIN

ATAVEANITNA

z0°O

0299

£0°0

€o°o

€0°0

co°O

€o°o

en) €0°o

to0'0 £0°0

£0°O

Ovud

NIVYD

OO00T £0°0

£0°0

£0°0

£0°0

£0°0

£0°0

£0°o

fo'o

£0°0

£0°O

Ovad

NIVUD

005 £0°0

£0°0

€0°0

€0°90 £6°0

£0°o

£0°0

£0°0

€o'o

£0°O

OVHA

NIVEOD

O7T £0°0

€o°0

£0°oO €o°o

£0°0

£0°O

£0°0

€0°0

£0°0

£0°0O Ovda

NIVUO

OF 6o°a

O199

OugZ

OL IwWnNd4a

SI VANY

ATaVNININA

60°90 0999

Ou¥3Z OL

Iwnda

SI VAUV

31aVeEININA

gb'o

oss9

OW3Z

OL TIwnda

SI VAN

ATAVUANTNA

60°O

oO1s9 Ou9Z

OL T¥NOA

SI WANN

ATAVUININA

oz°o0 00S9

Ou“3Z OL

Twnda

SI Vauv

aldvugnina

go°o

osTt9 OU3Z

OL Iwnds

SI WAV

ATAVHANINA

zo°o

oft

Ou3Z

OL TIwnda

SI VINNY

ATAWYAN TINA

1o0*o oz19

OW#32 OL

T¥NOA

SI VINNY

31TAVUININA

T0°0

oTtgs Ou“3Z

OL TWNOA

SI WAU

AIAVUAN INA

90°0

oorg

OU3Z

OL TWAOA

SI VAUY

JSIGVUSNINA

To°o

ozs

OuU3Z OL

T¥NOA

SI VAN

ATIGVESNTNA

00°°0 ozs

OU4FZ OL

T¥NOI

ST VSUN

AIGVHSNINA

00°0

Oz7S

OW#4Z OL

TYNOA

ST VAY

JIGVUSNINA

00°°O ozs

O#4Z

OL INHODA

SI VAIN

ADGVUSNINA

00°0O OTS

OU4Z

OL IVNOS

SI VGUN

ATaVUGNTNA

00°0

OTS

OW3Z

OL I¥NSD

SI VIRV

AIGVUININA

6b‘O

ozts

OW3Z

OL IWNOT

SI VAIYW

JIGWHYININA

er°o

Oree

OW32Z OL

IvWNOA

SY VIAN

ATGVHIANINA

€T'o

OfEC

OuG2

OL WAS

SI VIUN

ATAWHINTNA

¢0°O

OZEL

OW3azZ OL

IWNOA

SI Va

3TAVYAININA

€o°0

OT€ce Ou3zZ

OL Iwndgs

SI VAY

ATAVHAININA

£0°0

ovze

OW¥3Z OL

WWnda

SI VAM

ATAVHYAININA

Z70"0 oeze

OW¥3zZ OL

TWNOA

SI VAY

AITAVUANINA

£0"o

ozze

Ou4aZ OL

IwWndaA SI

VAN

ATAVHANTAA

£o0°0o OTZE

Ou9Z

OL IWNOST

SY VAUY

ATAVUANTINA

z70°O OTE

OW32

OL TWNOA

SL VAUNY

AIAVUSNINA

z70°0 ocre

Ougz2 OL

WHOA

Sl VAUV

ATAVUSNITNA

£0°0

OTTE

O422

OL TWAS

SI VW4UN

AdaVdINITNA

€0°0

oTre

OOOST

OOO£€T O007T

OOOTT

H00GT

0006

0008

0004

000s

OooEr wauyv

auYN

(QNOD33S

Udd L494)

Qagas

LVIUHL

aQaZLNaASaud LININOdWOD

NOTLWAR12

S39u93a

0 “HLAWIZY

sgayuoaa

o =

LIAdSY

WIVLLIV

€ Lavaos

(ponunuod) Toners, IMMIZY 0

: JOdIA JO

WouIssassY TYVAOO

JO SunSoM

-OT GEL

73

Page 81: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Oug2

OL

TVNOA

ST VSUY

IIAVYANTINA

st‘o

UvLsol

OW3Z2

OL

TIWADA

SI WANY

ATAGVHANTINA

LT*o

LYOdOT

OU3Z

OL

INADA

SI VIUW

AIAVUINTINA

zr"o

uvVisdan

O43Z

OL

TIwnNda

Sl VIUV

AIAVUININA

or’o

LUoddn

OOOST

OOOET

O0007T

oo0Tt

OOQOT

0006

0008

OOOL

0005S

O00€

Vauv

aWWN

(QNOD3S

U3d

LIYGd)

AAAdS

LVIaHL

Q3LN3S32ud

LNINOAWOD

NOISSIW

T THIH

HOS

(Lag4d

Quvndos)

Sway

RQ TAVUININA

ATM ILIAW

WAILSAS

NOISSIW

OW3Z

OL

IWNOF

SI VAY

ATAVHYANINA

90°0

TOULNOD

1 WVIN

OOOST

OOOET

O007T

OOOTT

a2000T

0006

0008

OOOL

000s

Ooot

Vauv

aIWWN

AYOOBLYS

(QNOD3S

UId

LAI4)

AAads

LVGdHL

aQ3LNasaud

dnouws

ATIN

(SWOUN

2TGVYUININA

LAIOUVEL

TWLOL

FHL

NI G2QGN1ONT

FAHY SLIASSY

ISAHL)

(Lda

TUNVNGS)

SdNOUD

ATAVUININA-ATAILINW

JO

SVAYUWY ATAVUININA

LOHS

JIONIS

Ougaz OL

Iwaba

SI VAUN

ATAVUANINA

To°o

oSsze O¥aZ

OL TWNOA

ST VAN

FIAVUSNTNA

80°O

ore

OY3Z

OL IAOGA

SI VAUV

ATEVHANTNA

g0°0

Orz>d OYUaZ

OL WNBA

SI VAUY

BIVAUANINA

€0°0

Otzb

OU3Z

OL WHA

SY VAUN

BTAVEINTNA

60°90 O7>

OW4Z

OL INNGA

SI VAUV

BATAVUSN INA

rO"O

o0zb

OW3Z

OL TWNOA

SI VAUN

BIAVYANINA

90°90 O6TF

OudZ

OL WHOA

SI VANV

ATAVYANTNA

t90°0 OsTr

Ou4aZ OL

IWNOD

SI VAdW

ITAVAANTNA

so°9o OLT?

OU3Z

OL IWNOA

SI VAUV

ATAVHININA

90°90 O9TP

OUdZ

OL IWNSA

SI VAUWN

AIGWHANITNA

$0°0

osts

OU4Z

OL TWNOA

SI WAAV

ATAVUANINA

90°0

ovte

OU8Z

OL TWNOA

SI VWAUY

ATAVAANINA

g0°0

OETe

OUIZ

OL IYNOA

SI WANN

ATAVHYININA

£0°0

Oortp OW3Z

OL TYNGOD

SI WRU

BTAVUANTNA

90°0

OTTb

OU4Z

OL IVNSSA

SY WAN

BIGVUANINA

To'O

OOTr

OH43Z OL

TYNOA

SI VSM

BIAVHENTNA

To°Oo oste

OU3Z

OL IWNOA

SI WAUW

ATAVMANIAA

Lt‘0

ooTts

OOOST

OOOET

O007T

OOOTI

OODOT

0006

0008

OOOL

000s

ooo€

Wauy

aWWN

(QNOD9S

UBd Ladd)

aQaads

LVIYUHL

aqgaLNasaud

LNANOdGNOD

NOILLVYAII14a saquogaa

oO “NLAWIZ2¥Y

S39u9aa

Oo =

LIAdSWY

NOVLIV

€ LYVAOS

(panunuod) WONEATA,0

MIMUIZY

0: todIA

JO MOUISSOSSY

LAVA

JO SUASOM

-OT MeL

74

Page 82: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

71°90

ot'o

so0°0

00°0

00°0

00°0

00061

orm ea Ww NC Bate we

mane eee

oo0scT

TZ°O

1z°0

12°0

12°90 rrcoo

61°90 To"

0 To°0a

so0°Oo e0°0

90°0O

uo°o

to°o

Fo°o

90°90 10°90

T0°O

z70°0

Jo°o

To°o

00°90 00°00

00°0

00°O

To°O

T0°0O 10°o

To"O

06°°O 60°9O

00°O

00°90

ooott

oa00z7T

NOISSIW

T6°L

66°L

Teese OL°k

Orr’

9o°L

Tere

epee

seg

16°9

et'y

G9" b

bee

6t°¢

OOOET

O007T

T2°0

TZ°O

6T°9

eo°O

10°O

00°06 00°0

OooTT

T2°0

Tz"o

1z°o

TZ°0

st"

oO gst" o

$0°0

90°90

Ouaz

OL

OuaZ

OL

ougz

OL

40°90 60°06

vo°o

6o°o0

90°O

Lo°O

10°

0 10"o

Ougz

OL

z70°0

£0°o

To*o

z70°0O

00°0

to"o

00°0

00°90

z70°0

z70°O

T0°0

To°o

00°00

o0°0

00°90 oo*o

OugzZ

OL

ouaz

OL

ouaz

OL

Ouaz

OL

Ooo00T

0006

(QNODZS

Had

Laas)

1 TIIM

WOU

10°

tek

ch a &

tere

L6°9

T6"+

ese

oooTt

90°8

sT°8

76°L

86°L

99°C

€L°k

OS°L

z7G°L SOL

TUk

vis

Tr's

bere

st’e

o000T

0006

zwz-a

Tz°0

ot°o

90°0O

AvnoO2a

SI

Avnod’

st

avao”@d

s!I

Oo1°o

60°70

Lo-0

a)

avnoa

st

0°90

z70°0

To*O

00°o

zao°o

To0°*O

o00°o

o0°0o

IWndg

SI

Wnda

SI

‘Ivnda

st

aAVAOd

¢

0008

aaaas

(L9aa

auvNnoSs) z7z7-o

Tz-°o

eT" o

so°o

Vauyv

Vawv

VauVv

otT'o

60°0

Lo-o

10°0O

VaUVv

ro'o

zo°0

10°90

00°O0

z70°O

To"o

00°0

oo°0

VauV

Vauav

VauVv

VaAuV

0004

z@77a

6T°9o

ONS

1 © oe)

81° 0

Ove

6T°0

ero

Oovua

10°o

00°o

Ovad

STEVUININA

ATEVEANINA

ATEVUANTNA

60°90 80°0

Ovaa

60°90 g0°o

OVvad

goo

to0°o

Ovas

00°0O 00°0

ovud

ATEUVUANINGA

vo°-o to°Oo

Ovid

70°

0 00°90

Ovud

10°o

00°90 oOvua

oo"0

00°o

Ovus

zo"Oo z70°0

Ovud

z70°O

T0°o

Ovi

00°0

o0°0

oval

00°90 00°06

Ovus

2V0OVESNINA

STUVEAIN INA

STUNG AININA

SVUENBANINA

000¢

OOO€F

NOYLVA314

SAIN97a

Sb

Tt"s

bo’s

S8°L

€S°L

LVL

CS°sS €s°b

0008

(QN0D3S

UW4d Ladd)

Q329dS

(L394

auvads)

tts

ST’?

L6°L

T9°L

tee

Ta°¢

oer

0004

“HLAWI2ZY

Sagu9ga

cp

Tz" tS°L

Ovua

S6°L

G@7k

Ova

9L°L

96°9

ovud

GroL

et*9

ovua

9L°9

oz" oval

“1-9

6e°t

ovud

bees 6T’€

Oovud

000¢

OO0C

SV3UV

ATGVUINTNA

NIVUS

NIvuo

Nivad

NIVUS

NIVuS

NIVUS

NIVYS

NIVUS

NIVHO

NIVYO

RIVES

NIWUS

NIvuo

NIvuos

NIVvuo

Nivus

AN2GNL

NIVUS

NIvuo

NYJvuod

Nivuo

NIivuo

Nivuo

NIVYS

LVQUHL

IVLOL

OO0T

00S oz! or

6t°o

O6TT

bo°o

OLTT

£0°o

oott

so°o

ostt

o00T

006 oz} oC

ez" 0 ogoT

10° 0 ovot

oo0T

oos ozy of

91°90 osot

oooT

00S ort Of

Fo°o

OroT

wz" o

Oreo

Te"o

otro

z7e°o ozo

6t°o

Otvo

Vauv

3WVN

QaLNnasaud

LNINOGWOD

SVAUV

ATAVYGNINA

AIONIS

IWAINSWAYODNT

LNANOdMWOD

LONS

JIONIS

= LAGS

XIVLIV

oooY

oas

Ove

ort 09

o¢ NOISSIW

st 13314

AUODALYS

T1IM

LOUS

DIDONIS

(1394

3UVNOS)

NI SVIUV

GQSLINAISAYd

AUNAINOGHOD

ATGVUINTNA

NOTLVAI149

(L394

guvnds)

$aa3uoqgq

cp

TL.°9

“HLAWIZY

S$23234930

Ge =

T =

VG4HV

GQQULNAS3Ud

IVLOL

LIAdSV

WOIVLLY

TONEAMT,, Gp UNUNIZY, Sp TOUTA TO

WOUISSOSSY TUVAOD

JO SMSO

“TT SEL

75

Page 83: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

OH¥432 OL

IVNOD

SI vauyv

a1avyugnina

80°0

Ootze

OUZZ

OL 'IVNOA

SI VaUNV

3TaVUaININA

o1r’o O77e

OuazZ OL

IVNOA

SI vauv

atTavugNiTnA

90°0

OTZE

OWaZ2 OL

TVNOZ

ST VAY

ATBVHINTNA

To'o

OPTE

O4¥83Z OL

IVAOA

ST VANV

BTAVUANINA

€0°0

OCTE

O42

OL INOA

SI vauV

ATaVUaNTNA

£0°0

O7TE

OW3Z

OL INNOA

CI vauV

adavugNdAA

T0°O

OTTE

OUaZ

OL INNO

SF VANV

ATEVEANITNA

#0°O

oroe

OU4Z

OL WWANOA

SI VIYV

39TaVUaINITNA

L¢t°o ocor

OWAZ

OL INANOA

£1 VANV

SIGVUANINA

et’ o

O7Of

O¥4|Z OL

IVAOA

CI VAUV

FTAVUENINA

vo'o

oToc

OU3Z

OL IVNOA

SI vauV

adavuanina

91°?

osst

O4¥3Z OL

IVNOS

SI vauv

adavugnina

z70°0 OL!

L0°0

L0°O

Lo'o

L0°O

L0°0

L£0°0O Lo0°0

£0°0

Lo-o

90°0

OVUd

NIVUD

aOOT

£0°0o L0°0

£0°0

L0°0

L070

L0°0

1o0°Oo L£0°o

L£o°0o 90°90

OVHY4

NIVUD

OOS

40°70 L£0°0

L£0°0 Lo'o

L0°90 40°0

Lo0°0 L0°O

90°0

90°90 OVA

NIVUD

O71 io°O0

140°0O Lo0°0o

Lo0°0o 90°O

90°0O 90°0

90°O

90-0 o0°o

OVS

NIVND

Of 60°90

O9vT

00°0

00°9o 00'0

00°O

00°0O o0°'Oo

00°0

00°0

00°O

00°90 OVUA

NIVND

GOOT

00°o

o0°o

o0'o

oo'a

60°0

ooo

60°90 o0°O

00°90 00°0

OVUA

NIVHD

005 00°o

00°0

00°o

00°O

00°O

00°0

00°00 00°00

00°0

00°'0 OVUd

NIVUD

OFT vo'o

40°0

vo'o

f0°O

£o°o

z0°0

z0°0

T0"O

00°0

00°0

OvVUa NIVUOD

OF Lo°o

OSs!

90°0

90°0

90°0

90°0

90°90 90°90

90°0

90°90 90°90

90°90 OVUd

NIVUD

OOOT

90°90 90°0

90°90 90°0

90°0

90°0

90°90 90°90

90°90 90°0

OVHA

NIVHD

006

90°0

90°0

90°90 90°0

90°0

90°90 90°0

90°90 90°90

90°90 OVHI

NIVUO

0271 80°0

#0°0

£0°0

40°O

L0°0

L0°0

90°90 90°0

90°0

s0"0

OVUl

NIVYD

OF or’o

Orel

00°0

00°06 00°0

00°0

00°O

00°0

00°90 00°90

00°0

00°0

OVUd

NIVHD

OOOT

00°0

00°0

00°90 00°0

00°0

00°0

00°0

00°90 00°0

00°0

OvVUA NIVUD

00S 00°0

00°0

00°0

oo0°O 00°O

00°o

00°0

00°0

00°0

00°oO SVU

NIVYD

02] z70°0

zo°9o 10°O

10°90 To°o

To'o

1o°0

T0°0

00°0

00°O

OVUd

NIVUD

OF s0°0

OZ 00°0

00°O

00°90 00°0

00°o

00°O

00°90 00'0

00°0O oo°a

OVUS

NIVYD

OOOT

00°0

00°'o 00°90

00°O

00°O

00°°o 00°90

00°0

00°O

00°90 OVUd

NIVUD

006 00°90

00°90 00°0

o0°0

oo°oa 00°90

oc’o

00°O

06°0

00°90 OVUYd

NIVED

OZT

s0’°O

go0°0

so0°0

g0°O

vo°o

€0°o

z70°O

T0°0O 00°90

00°90 OWYA

NIVYOD

OF 67°06

OTbT

Tro

Tt’o

Tt"o

Tr’°o

Tro

TT’o

Tt"o

TT"o

TT°o

oT’

os OVUA

NIVUD

OOOT

Tr‘

oO TI"o

TT’o

Tt"

oO TT’

o It’o

TTt°o

Tt‘o

o1T'o

oto

OVuda

NIVUD

OOS

TI°

0 Tt'o

TT"

o 11°90

TT’°o

TT‘

o oT’o

oT"o

o1°o

oT’

Oo OVYd

NIVUD

O71] 01°09

ot'o

or'o

oT’o

or-o

oT" oO

ot'o

ot‘a

ot°o

60°0

OVUA

NIVUD

OF tt°o

Oort

eT’a

€t'o

€t‘o

c1°o

eT" 9

€t°o

e1°o0 tI" o

£T'o

C1" 0

OVUA

NIVUD

OOOT

tt‘o

tt°o

tt’o

eto

eT’o

etco

tTt’o

Ct*o

eto

€t‘o

OVUA

NIVUD

OOS

eT" 0o

C10

£1" o

€1r°o tt‘o

€l‘o

cT"o

tt"o

tt‘o €T°

Oo OVH4

NIVUD

O77 tt'o

Ct‘ o

et°o

tr°o

et"

o tt°o

tr°o

tt"o

€1t°o

Of’o

OVUI

NIVHSD

OF ft°o

O6CT

00°O

00°°o 00°90

00°0

00°0

00°0

10°O

70°O

To0°0 00°o

OvVuYA NIVUD

OOOT

00°0O 00°0

00°0O 00°O

00°0

00°9

00°90 00°0

oo0°o o0°0

OVNA

NIVHOD

006 00°O

00°90 00°°0

00°O

00°0

00°°O 00°0

00°0

00°'o 00°o

OVA

NIVUD

OZT 00° 0

00'0

00°0

00°90 oo°o

00°O

00°0

60°0

00°6

00°0

Ovud

NIVHD

O€ v1°o

Ost!

OUAZ

OL IVNOD

ST VAUV

ATEVUINTINA

£0’°o OPET

9t°0

g9°o

Leo

ce°"o

ce-o

ce-o

£9°o

98°0

ge8°0

Te°o

OVUd

NIVUD

OOOT

8°90

98°0

9R8°0

98°0

98°0

se*o0

st’o

Se"

0 eB"

oO eL°o

OVUd

NIVUD

OOS

g@'o

S8°o

98°0

ge°0

s2'0

98°0

98°90 bs"o

Ts'o

9L°0

OWUA

NIVUS

O77 z79°0

Te"0

T@°0

1e°o

oe’o

6L°0

6L4°0

gi"0

e2°"o 79°0

OvVud

NIVUD

OF et’T

ozzy

ooOoSsT

OooCct

0007T

o0oTT

ooooT

0006

0008

OOOL

000S

Ooor

Vauv

3JWVN

(QNOD3S

Wad LA3a)

GQaAaas LVQUHL

Q3LNasgaud

LNANOGHOD

NOTLVASII

SABUOdad

Gp “HLAWIZY

$33499@

$b =

Lodasy

NOVLLY

t HUY

AOD

(ponunuod) Worneaay,

Cp YINUIZW

Cp: JodTA

JO TMOMISSaSSy

TUIVAOD IO

SHAS

Ty Oe,

76

Page 84: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

oT'o

oT’o

oT*o

ot°o

oT" o

oT" oO

oTt'o oTt"o

or'o

£0°0

OWuUd NIVYD

OQOOT oTt°o

oTt’o or'o

oT"o

oro

ot"o

ot"o

oT"o

£0°Oo Lo°Oo

OW

NIVYS

OOS 60°0

60°0

60°0

60°O

60°0

60°0

60°0

60°0O 90°90

90°00 OWUa

NIVUS

O27 90°0

£0°0

Lo°o

Lo*o

90°90 90°90

90°0

90°90 so°0

so°o

OVUd

NIVUD

OF €t°o

0959

zt*a

ze°O

z7e°o o£*O

67°0

6Z7°O ez°o0

ez°0

e7°0

¥z=-O0 OVWuUd

NIVYD

OOOT

oc'o

67°0

67°0

8z°0

gz-0

ez7°0 ez'°o

87°00 L7°0

ez°o

OVdd

NIVUD

006 ero

sz°0

ez°0

ez" 0

et°0

on)

Lz°0

L£t°0 97°90

6T°O

OWUd

NIVYD

OZ7T 92°90

92°90 97°90

Sz7°0 $z°o

gt" 0

€z°0

tz°0

8T° oO

00°0

OVuUd NIVHD

OF S9°0

06S9

O¥3Z

OL IWNOA

SI VAN

JTAVUINTNA

TT‘ 0

ors9

eec°o ec*o

et" o

€e°O

et°o

te°o

z£°O

zt°o

a)

ez°O

OVUd

NIVYD

OOOT

gc" o

te"o

€t'o

ze°o

gt" o ze"

Oo tt*o

ee" oO

ee’ o

on!) SvVua

NIVYUDS 00S

tf£°o ee'o

€€°o

€e"o

ee'o

ec" o

te°o

ze" oO

7t°0

£7°O

OWUA

NIWUD

OZT ze°0

ze°0

ze€°O ze"

0 ze'o0

ze°o

Te°O

Tt°o

Lz°0

00°0

Ovud

NIWUD

OF es"

0 00S9

z0°Oo 70°70

z0°0

z70°0 €0°O

60° O

bo°o

ba°0

60°90 bo°O

OVH I

NIVHOS

OOOT

t0°Oo 70-0

z0°O

z0°O0 70°90

£o0°o ro'o

bo"O

bo°O

bo'o

OVWUd NIWUO

00S To°9a

Ta°o

To*o

To" Oo

T0°9O TO"

O 70°90

€0°o

£0°o

To*o

OWHd

NIVYD

OT

To'0

To" oO

T0°0

To0°9O TO"

O T0°

Oo T0°O

zo°o

T0°0

To°O

OWUd

NIVYD

OF sTt°o

osT9

OY3Z

OL IVNOA

SI V3UV

ATAVUANINA

L£0°0o oct9s

z0°0

z70°0 £0°O

£0°O

€0°0

bo°O

#0°0

bo-o

£0°O

70°0

OVud

NIVYSD

OOOT

z0°O0 z70°O

z0°0

£o0°Oo to°a

£o°0

¥o0°O £0°O

€0°0o z70°0

OWY2

NIVHYD

00S z0°Oo

z70°0 z0°Oo

Z0°O

£0°o

£0°o

£0°0

€0°O

z0°O

To*o

OVaGd NIVHD

OT

z0°O

z0°Oo z0°0

z70°0O zo°90

z0°Oo 70°90

T0°0

T0°O

00°90 OWUd

NIVYSD

OF 90°0

OzT9

O42

OL IVNOT

SI VAN

ATAVUININA

90°0

OTT?

00°O

To0°o To°o

To*o

To" oO

T0°O

10° Oo T0°O

T0°o

To°-o Ovyed

NIVYSD

OOOT

00°0

00°90 00°70

00°90 00°0O

To'o

To°O

T0°O

t0°0

oo0°0 OWUA

NIVYD

00S 00°0O

00°0

0o0°O 00°0

00-0

00°90 0o0°°O

00°0

00°90 00°0

OWusg NIVYUSD

O2T o0°O

00°0

00°0O 00°0

00°90 00°90

oo°0

00°0O 0o°O

00°0

OVUd

NIVUD

OF st-o

o0Tt9 OW32

OL IVNOA

SI VAUN

ATEVYANITNA

10°9o Orgs

O4aZ

OL IWNOA

SI VANV

ALTAVUINTNA

To°O

ocets Ouaz2

OL TWNOA

SI VAN

ATAVHANINA

00°0

oz27s OU3Z

OL IWNOD

SI VAUY

ATAVYININA

To0°0 OT?sS

Ou¥32Z OL

INOS

SI VAY

ATAVUANITINA

1z°Q

OFTS

Ou3Z

OL IVNOA

SI WSUV

ATAVHANINA

90°06 Oocts

TO0°O To"o

T0°O

00°9o 00°0

00°0

oo°°0 00°90

00°O

00°70 OvVes

NIVYO

OO00T 00°O

00°Oo 00°0O

o0°a

oo°o

ooo

0o0°a a0°0O

ao°o

60°0

OWA

NIWHD

006 o0°Oo

00°90 00°90

00°0

00°0

00°0

00°0

00°0

00°0

00°0

OVUa

NIVHOD

O7T 00°0O

o0°Oo 00°90

00°O

00°90 00°0

00°90 00°0

00°90 00°0

OVas

NIVESD

O€ Ob

tT O7TS

OUAZ

OL TIWNOS

SI VIUN

ATAVYINTNA

60°90 ObEE

OUdZ

OL IWNOS

SI WAUW

ATAVYANINA

oT°o

OCcEee OYaZ

OL INNS

SI WSU

ATAVUANTNA

z70°O OzEE

OW3Z2 OL WN

SI WauvV

ATGvVUaNTNA

£0°0

OTEE

OugdZ OL

IWNOD

SI VU

ALTAVHANINA

80°0

OvZE

OOOST

OOO€T

OQ007T OOOTT

O000T

0006

0008

O00L

000S

OOOE

Vauyv 3WWN

(QNOD3S

Uad L334)

A3q9ds

LVIMHL

QaLNasaud

LNINOdGWOD

NOILWA3T2

SAasudTd

GP ‘HLAWIZY

Saauogd

SF =

LIadSWY

WIVLLY

t LUvVaoo

(panunuoD) WoNeaspy

Cp YNUIZY

Cp - Jodi,

JO Wouissassy

LAVAO]O

JO SiWMSoOy

TT Ode.

77

Page 85: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

va'o

rO°O

boo

$0'0

$0°0Q 60°0

$a°o

$0°0

$0°0O

$o°oa

OVUd

NIVYD

OO0OT

boo

ro‘O FOO

S0°0 $0°0

so-0 $0°0

S0°0 $0°0

S50°0 OVUd

NIVHD 005

PO'O p0"O

60°0 b0°0

60o'0 50°90

$0°0 $0°0

60°0 £0°0

OVH2 NIVUD

O71 10°90

£070 rO'O

FOO

S0°0 60°70

60'0 s0°0

b0°O 00°0

OVUd NIVYD

OF bet

OTF

00°0 00°O

000

00‘0 00°0

00°90 00°0

00°0 00°90

00°0 OVUd

NIVED

OOOT 00°0

00°0 00°0

00°0 00°0

00°0 00°90

00°0 00°0O

00°0 OVUA

NIVED 006

00°6 00°0

00°90 00°0

00°00 00°0

00°00 00°0

00°0 00°0

OVA

NIVUD O77

T6°0 T0°O

Too

00°90 00°6

00°0 00°00

00°0 00°0

00°90 OVUd

NIVHD Of

9z°T Octr

00°0 To"0

10°O 10°O

Too

10°O To'O

Too

T0*O To'o

OVUA NIVAD

0001 00°0

00°'0 To"0

To'o To0°O

TO"O To"0

To‘0 To’0

10°90 OVUA

NIVED 006

00°0 00°60

00°0 00°0

To"O To°o

To0‘0 T0°0

T0°0 00°0

OVUs NIVUD

O7ZT 00°70

10° 00°0

oo'o 00°0

To"o 00°0

00°06 00°0

00°0O OVUd

NIVED OF

Sut

OZTb OUAZ

OL IWNGA

SI VaUV

adavuaNnina

6E'T O1T>

O42

OL Ivnda

SI vauv

atavuanina

bo'o OOTD

To"0 z0°o

20°0 z0°0

z0°0 £0°0

f0°0 fo'o

z20°0 70°0

OVU2 NIVUD

0001 T0"O

z0"Oo 20°0

z0°o zo'O0

70°90 zo°o

zo'o z70°0

zo°o OVUa

NIVUD

006 00°0

To"o To"0

To°0 T0*O

To"o T1070

Z70°0 z0°0

To'o OvUd

NIVEOD O21

00°0 0070

00°90 00°0

00°O 00°90

10°90 an)

20°0 Z20°0

OVU2 NIVHO

OF st‘o

oste 9€°0

90°00 e790

et'o 60°6

oro

or'o C70

9¢°0 Lz'0

OVI

NIVED

0001 ye-o

ro O

veto pe*o

Peo

veo

p£°O bE'O

L770 L1'0

OVYS NIVUD

00S Lz"0

G2°0 v7~7O

£7°0 72°0

02°90 e1'o

9T"0 zt'o

L0°0 OVA

NIVUD

O71 ¥0°O

$0°0 90°0

90° 0

90°0 90°0

$0°0 boo

vo'o 70°0

OVA

NIVYOD O¢

{9"0 OOTS

GU4Z OL

IWNOI SI

vaUV aTaVUaNINA

TRO

0899 gf°o

ef" oO

eco

eco

2c" 0 ac'o

gto

gE "0

ge" O

Lt°Oo OVA

NIVUD

OO0OT eco

8£°O et'O

gf" 0 at‘o

g£'°O se°o

gt‘o LE'O

Sto

OVUd NIVUD

006 Lt°70

Lt‘o Lt°o

Le°O Lt*0

0 St'o

St‘o we‘

o TE"O

OVYA NIVUD

0271 70°70

7t"0 1f*o

Te" 0

ot°o oc’a

oc‘o 67°0

gz°0 tz-o

OVUA NIVUD

OF sea

0L99 99° 0

99° 0 94° 0

99°70 94°70

99°70 99° 0

99°70 99° 0

96°70 OVNA

NIVUD

000T 99°

6 99°

0 99°90

99° 0

9970 99°

0 99° 0

99°70 99°0

65°70 OVUA

NIVUD

005 99°70

99°0 99°90

99° 0

99°70 9970

99° 0 99°

0 £9°0

9v°0 OVS

NIVUD

O77 ry'o

Py" oD

r9'O 69°00

G9°0 69°

0 09°0

96°0 £b-O

00°0 Ovud

NIVUD

OF 66°0

0999 90°0

90°0 90°0

90°06 90°0

90°0 90°0

90°90 90°

0 60°70

OVA

NIVUD

0O0T 90°0

90°0 90°0

490° 0

90°0 90°

0 90°70

90°0 90°O

§0°0 OVA

NIVUD 006

90°70 90°90

90°0 90°90

90°0 90°0

90°0 90°0

90°0 60°O

OVMA NIVHO

021 90'0

90°0 90°0

90°0 90°0

90° 0

90°09 $0°0

$0°O 00'0

OVA

NIVUD

Of 90°0

0s99 20°0

g0°O Boo

80° 0 80°0

#0°0 g0'0

20°70 20°0

80°0 OVUd

NIVUD

0007 0°0

20°0 80°70

#0°0 20°0

20°70 20°90

80°0 80°00

L0°0 OVA

NIVUS

006 eo'a

80°C g0°6

80°70 80°0

¢o°O 80°O

@0°0 eo°o

90°0 OVUd

NIVHD

o7T suo

80°0 80°00

20°0 90°0

8070 e0°0

80°0 10°0

00°0 OVU4

NIVHO OF

ze"o 0F99

07°0 0z'0

2°00 97°70

L£2°0 62°70

Tro

Teo

Te" 0

Teo

OVUA NIVUD

OQOOT 0770

07°90 0Z°0

0zZ°0 Lz7°0

67° 0

Teo

Tb‘o Tho

of*O OVYd

NIVHS

006 02°90

0z°0 02°90

oz"0 o2°0

02°90 0z'0

eco

oro

£2°0 OVA

NIVED

O71 07°0

02°0 oz°0

ozo

02°0 oz"0

61°0 Tz-0

91°90 00°0

OVA

NIVUO OF

65°0 0£99

£0°O £0°O

£0°0 £0°0

£0°O £0°0

0°90 £0°0O

£0°O £0'o

OVYd NIVHD

0001 £0°0

£0°0 £0°0

£0°0 £0°0O

£0'0 €0°0

£0°'0 €0°O

£0°0 OVUM

NIVYD

006 Z0°0

£0°0O £0°O

£0°0 £0°0

£0°0 £0°0

£0°0O fo'o

£0°O OVYA

NIVED

O71 00°0

00°0 00°90

10°90 T0°0

To"O 10°0

10°90 £0°0O

z70°0 OVUA

NIVED

OF #0°0

0799 ¥T"O

bt" oO bt7o

PI°O vt‘o

vt'o IO

bT"0 rT"

0 bt"o

OVU4 NIVED

000T vt‘o

bT "Oo

e1'o tt" 9

To

bt‘o bT"0

vI‘o eto

rt'o OVA

NIVHD

005 vt7o

bt" 0

rT" oO

vt'o rI-O

vt" oO 1-0

bI-O pi'o

rI°O OVUd

NIVHD

O71 vio

T° 0

IO

vt-"o 1°

0 vT‘o

vI‘O bT‘o

pT’ oO rT'O

OVHA NIVED

OF vt‘o

0199

OOOST OOOET

O00Z% OOOTT

o000T 0006

0008 0004

0005 oaot

Vauv IWVN

(QNODAS

W4d 4943)

aaggqas LVQaNL

QaLnasgud

LNANOdNOD

NOITLVAR14

SdaauoDad

CP “HLAWI2V

S3qduD9da

Cp =

LIIdSV

WOVLLV

(ponunuod) WONEAIT

Cp YINUIZY

Cp. lodTA

JO WMouIssassy

LIVAOD

JO SHNSOY

TT Oqal

78

Page 86: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

6e'T

ect

9z°T

e0°0

09°90 09°0

09°0

eo°o

L£z°0 97°0

gz°O

so°0

€z7° 0

zz°90 TZ°O0 £0°0O oz°o

07°90 6T° oO

zo°o

ct"o

LT°o

it°o

€0°0

bTt°o ero

br-o

€o°o

et" o

sT°o

sr-o

60°90 £0°O

co°o

Lo°"o €0°0

g0°90 g0°0

eo°0

€0°0

90°90 90°0

90°90 zo°Oo

ooosT

€ £avaoyd

(panuluod) TONEY,

Cp YMUNIZY

Cp - odiA

JC WatussassyY

LUVAO

JO SiMSoy

TT SIGeL,

wet

oot

ge"

$t°o

09°90 09°90 85° 0

st’o

ez'0

97°0

st°0

s0°o

€7°O

tz°O0 0z°0

ro°o

oz°o

oz°0

6T’'0 ro'O

gTt"o 8Tt°o zt°0

so-o

eT" oO

st°o

st°o

s0°0

6T"O0 te

eT" 9o

L0°O

Lo°o

Loo

£0°o

£0°o

60°90 90°0

so°o

bo°O

L£0°O 90°90 90°0

€0°O

OOOET

get

wet

ovr

e£°o

T9° 0

T9°0

@s°0

Lz='o

st’ oO

ct‘o

90°O

st’a

sTt°O

st"o

40°90 61°0

61T°O eto

20°90

t0°0

Loo

Lo°o

ro" oO

60°90

80°90

g0°O

so°a

Lo°O

L0°0

90°90

go°o

ao0o0zT

bot

tb T

Te T

6b°O

T9° 0

19°90 09°90 97°90 L£z°O 92°0O sz"0

e0°0

zz°a

zZ°O

zz°0

L0°o

o2°0

a)

6T°0

90°0

gsTt°o st"o

iTt"o £0°o

9T°9O st°o

sTt"0 90°9O 6T°0

6T"O

eT" oO

60°90

Lo°O

L£o°o £0°0

bo°O

60°0

60°0

80°90 so°o

80°O

L£0°90 90°0

£0°Oo

OoootT

SP°T

beet

tet

6S°0

T9° 0

T9°0

09°90 oft°o c£z°0 Lz"0

Sz" 0

ot"o

z2° 0

zz°0

zz°0

#0°0

0z°O

0z°0

6T°"0 80°90 et"o

st*o

st°o

80°9O 9T°0

9T° 0

st°o

co"*o 6T‘O

6T*O

eT"o

ot’oa L£o0°0 £0°0

Lo°o

bo'o

ot*o

60°0

g0°O

#0°0

80°0

g0°0

90°0

£0°O

oo0oT

9b°T

Sb°t

eo°T

zL°O

19°90 T9°0

09°90 st‘o

ct°"o Lz°0

st-0o zt’o

zz*0

z2°O0 zz"0

60°0

o2°0

0z°0

6t°o

60°70 st"a

Bt‘o

8t°o

60°0

9T°O

9t°90 sto

g0°0

6T°0

6T'°O 6T° 0

TI’ oO

80°90 L£0°0o Lo*o

90°0

otT’o oto

60°90 60°0

80°90 90°90 80°0

80°O

0006

9Pr°T SbT

fe°t

t2°o

z79°0 T9°0

19°0

te°o

ez°0

tz°0

92°0

€t"o

zz°Oo z7Z°0 zz°o

oT"o

0z°0

6T°o

6T°O

or°o

st" oO

8T°0

eT" oO

oT" oO

9T°O

9T°0

st'o

0°70

61" 0

61°90 67°90 91°0

80°O

80°0

£o°0

80°90 ot'o

oT'o

60°90 ot’o

go°°o 80°70 g0°O

20°0

0008

(QNOD3S

Yad

1334)

aa3as

NOILVAGIS

SIZUOTA

Ge

9b T

Shit

ze T

06°0

z9°0

z79°0 T9°0

Tb" oO

gz°O

gz" 0

L770

sT’o

zz°0

gz" 0

tz° 0

zt°o

6t"o

6T°0

6T’ 0

zT°o

gt°o

eT" 0

sT°o

zt" o

91° 0

9T° 90

st°oa st°o

6T’o

6t°o

0z°0

Tt' 0

80°90 g0°0

80° 0

60°0

oT" o

ot’o

oT’ Oo

Tt" oO

g0°o

80°O

80°O

g0°0

0004

sbct

bet

6t°T

oc T

z9°0

19° 0

19°0

gs°0

Cz°O

Lz°0

Lz°0

bz°0

zz" 0

zz°0

72° 0

0z°0

6T°0

6T°0

6T°0

6T°0

st°o

sT°o

eto

ST°o

9T°0

9T°0

st’ o

bt°o

61° 0

6T°O

6t°O

et‘o

80°90 g0°O

#0°0

L0°O

oT" 0

ot" oO

oT’9o 80°70 g0°0O 0-0

80°0

90°90

000s

Or'T

cect

oc*T

Le°0

T9°0

19°90 ts°o

be'o

cz°o

Lzt° 0

zz 0

zz° 0

z7Z°0 7z°0

0z°0

6T°0

6T° 0

6T°O

6T°O

67° 0

eT" 0

et" o

st*o

sTt"0 st°o

st’ oO

br°o

brt'o 6T°O

6T° 0

61°90 st"o

g0°0

80°0

£0°0

to°0

ot°o

oro

80°0

go°o

so°o

g0°0

90°90 00°90

ooo€e

ONUa

oVud

OVUd

DVud

ovud

aVaa

OVUS

OvVud

OoOVvudd

oVvadd

Ovdd

oOVdd

oVud

oWudd

OVWUd

OWud

oOWud

OWudd

OWUd

OWud

oVus

OWud

NIVyYo

NIVYS

NIwuod

NIVYUS

NIVYUS

NIVHS

Niwud

NIwud

NIVUS

Nivud

NIVYUS

NIVYUS

NIVYaS

NIVUd

NIvuo

NIVYS

NIwusS

NIVYUD

NIVUS

NIVYD

NIVUSd

NIVYS

NIVYd

NIvus

NIwu5

NIvVyud

NIvuo

NIVHO

NIVUS

NIVUS

Nivuo

NIvad

NIVYUS

NIWVYS

Niwu9d

NIVud

NIWYH9S

NIWus

NIwao

NIWYaS

NIvu9

NIWUd

NIVYS

Niwyd

LVIYHL

Oo0T

00S oct ot o00T

00S ort oft oanT

00S ort of oooT

00S oct oc OOOT

00S OtT o¢ ooor

00S ozT o¢ O0oT

00s oct oc oooT

00S ozT o¢ OOOT

aos oz7T o¢ ooor

00S ozT o¢ OOO0T 00s ozt of

“HLAWI2VY

S3a3uDaa

SP

9v°T

70°?

92°72

bz°2

ee?

62°27

tee

ore

b1°e

est

6s"T

Wauw

Q2LN3S3aud

OSste

Oreb

Ottp

Otze

OTz>b

Oozb

O6T?

Oster

OLTb

OOTP?

OST)

AWN

LNINOdWOD

= LOIdSW

WOIVLLV

79

Page 87: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

FO" Oo

b0°O

€0°0

z70°0

000ST”

so-o

bo°o

fo°0

z0°Oo

oOo0tT

(ponunuoD) Woneadg[,

Sp

OO0L

VIN

fo°0

bo°o

70°98 To°O

2v'o

zr°o

zT°0

Lo°o

L0°O

90°96 s0°0

t0°0

£0°0O £0°O

to°o

z0°o

000S

z70°O To°O

T0°O

00°0

zr-o

z7T°O 60°0

90°0

90°0

96°06 z70°0O 00°9O to°o

€0°0

z0°O

10°9o

O00€

ovud

OVvud

OvVUd

ovudd

OVUa

Ovid

ovudi

oOvad

oVUd

ovud

Oovud

ovud

ovud

ovud

Ovadd

ovua

NIWYS

Nivud

NIVUS

NIvwo

NIvusd

NIVUS

NIwusd

NIvuo

NIvuo

Nivuo

NIvuo

NIVYS

Nivao

Nivud

NIvus

NIvuo

LIVZUHL

oooT

00s oz! o¢ oooT

00s oz! oc oo0oT 60S oz

oft oo0T

00S ozT o¢

61°90

99°90

0s‘o

TI°o

Wav

Q3LNasadd

YVLSO

LYoOdo4

UVLsdn

Luoddn

3aWWN

LNINOdWOD

uod

(Laaa

3dVNOS)

SVIYY

BIGVYANTINA

ATAILINW

W3LSZS

NOTIVAGTZ

Saguogd

Gop

$o0°o boro

70°0

To"O

ooo€

ovud

OvVud

ovud

owudd

“HLAWIZY

S3du93q

Sb

Nivud

oOooT NIvud

00S NIVUS

OZT NIVYUS

OF

LVIGHL

90°0

Vauv

Q2iLN3S3ud

TOULNOD

SWYN

qnouyo

eB LOIdSVY

NOVLLY

TO AITT4H

AUODBLVD

VI0

(SV2UV

ATAVUININA

LAOUVL

TVLOL

AHL

NI

G30NIONI

JUN

SLINSIY

JSAIHL)

(L392

3UVNOS)

SdNOUD

BIAVUYANINA-AIDGILIAW

JO

SVSUY

BIAVUANINA

LOHS

3IONTS

70°90 £0°o

z70°0 z70°0

£0°o

£0°O

£0°0

z70°0 zo°o

z0°O

70°0

70°90 £0°0

co°o

TO°O

z70°0 zo0°0

zo0°0 z0°0

z70°O 70°90

To0°O Too

T0°O

T0°O

To"O

T0°O

To"0

bt°a

eto

eto

cr°o

zt°0

z7t°o z1°o

bT'O

€Tt"o et"o

€r°o

a

zT°o

zT°o

bTt'o €1°o

€t’o

a 7 a

€T° 0

tro

s0°0

60°0

60°0

oT’ oO

60°0

60°0

oT" o

Lo°o

£0°0

40°90 L£0°O

£0°0o Lo’o

£0°0

L£o0°o £0°0o

£0°0

Lo"o

£0°0

96°90 90°90

90°0

90°90 90°0

90°90 90°0

Lo°o

90°90 T9°0

70°O

z0"O

z0°O

zo0"0 z70°0

€0°0

'0°O

FO"O

vo°o

bo" vo°o

vo"o

¥o°O

£0°0

bO"O

bo'o

bo'O

ro°o

bO'O

boo

€0°0

fo°o

£0°0

€0°0

£0°0o €0°0

£0°o

Too

T0°0

To"0

z70°O z70°0

70°90 zo"0

OOOST

QOOET

O00Z72T OOOTT

OO0OT

0006

0008

(QNOD3S

Yad

L292)

agzads

NOISSIW

T

$0°0

s0°o

$0°O

$o°o

so°o

So°O

so*o

g0°0

s0°0

$o°o

so°o

$0°0

so°0

so°o

£0°0

€0°"90 €o°o

PO" O

b0°O

bo°o

bo°o

70° 0

70°90 z70°O

z70°0 z70°0

z0°O

zoo

OoOZT

OOOTT

OO00T

0006

0008

0004

0006

(QNOD3S

U3d

LAIA)

AAZdS

£ LYVAOD

TIMUIZY, Cp. JOdIA JO

WouIssassY TUVAOO

JO SuNSOY

TT OGeL

80

Page 88: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

£0°O

z70°O Too

00°Oo

so‘o

£0°0

£0°0

00°0

oo°o

60°O

00°0

00°0

oo-'oa a0"o

00°0

00°90

OO0ST

as°s

bea

ee°e

TL°9

OLS

ct’s

cee

ooost

£0°0

0°90

£0°0

to °0

zo0°'0 £0°'0

ea) 00°90

$0°0

40°0o ¥0°0

so°o

T0°O

To"a

00°0

00°0

T0°0

To°o

TO°O

To‘o

00°0

00°0o 00°o

00°o

T0°O

T0°9

00°0O 1o°a

00°O

00°O

00°0

o0°0

OOOET

O00TT

NOISSIW

es" s

9°8

68

oss

90°8

£T"s

eere

gered Te°9

eee

a

bb's

zsce

9Sg°¢

OOOET

O007T

to°o

£0°O

£0°0

60°0

tT°-o 90°0

£0°0

00°0

z70°0 To’o

o00°0 oo0°O To"o

To0°o 00°0O 00°°o

oooTT

€0°O

to°o

t0°o

€0°0

€0°0

£0°0

T0°O

To°o

O43Z

OL OuaZ

OL OWwaZz

OL €T"o

et°o

€T°o

eT°o

rO0°O 90°90

00°0

00'0

OugzZ OL

z0°0

z70°0 z0°O

z0°O

00°0o 00°0

00°0

00°0

To°*O T0°O

10°06 10°90

00°Oo 00°Oo

o0°O

00°0O Ouaz

OL Ougz2

OL OugZ

OL ouaz

OL

OO00T

0006

£0°O

£0°o

£0°0

00°0

TWAO3

WAS

Iwndg

7t"o

z7r’o ot"o

00°0

WHO]

z0°0

z70°0 00°0

o0°0

To'o

10°90 00°0

00°90 TWAdZ

IWN0d

IWNO

twndg

o008

(QNOD3S

Wad

Laa4)

agads

T TTIN

WO4

z7L°8 gs°8

6T's

00°s

TE°L

99°%b T9"¢

OOOTT

b.°s

eL°s

6S°8

c9°8

sz°s

ee°a

90°8

sT°@

sere

BSL

96°%

La°s

9L°t

96°¢

aQoooT 0006

sI

sI

st

sr

st

st

st

si

(Laga

auvnds) £0°o

£0°0o

£0°0

To0°90

VaHV

Wauv

Vauyv

et°o

et°o

or-o

00°0O

Way

€0°O

z70°O

00°Oo

00°0O

To°o

T0"O

00°0O

00°0

VWauv

WIV

Vauyv

Wauv

O00L

to°o

£0°-0

£0°0

00°0o

AVEVUINTAA

ATEVEINTNA

ATAVUININA

€T°o

€r"o

Tt’o

00°O

QIAVHANITINA

£00

z0°"0

00°90

00°O

To"o

10°9

00°0o

00°0

ATAVUANTAA

ATAVUANTINA

ATEVUANINA

ATAVAININA

0005

NOTLVAS19

S39N9T0

0

sis

£978

sts

st‘s8 were

LSs"s TZ°F

0008

(QNODaS

Usd

LAAZA)

AIAdS

(L934

a4uVvnds)

TL°8

T9°8

se°s

60°93 bere

os's

60°b

O00L

(L394

3uvnds)

09's

Sb°8

Sz"s

S6°L

6E°L

us°9

v6’?

000S

(Laga4a auwnos)

NOTLVARI2

SAIHOAId

O to°o

£0°O

€0°0

00°0

€TtT'o et’o

00°0

00°90

z70°0 T0*O

00°0

00°0

To0°o TO"

0 00°90 00°0O

OO0€

60°8

BL°L

6b°L

s6°9

ORS

9T°S

tte

ooo€

OWRa

Oovwuda

OWud

owud

owdd

ove

oOwud

ovua

Oovudd

oVudd

ovua

OVUd

Owuda

owud

Ova

SVAAV

ATGVUIN INA

st°s

Niwad

NiIwud

NIwud

NIVuod

NIVYUS

NIvud

NIWYS

NIvus

NIvuas5

NIVuo

NIvuaod

NIvud

Nivuod

NIVES

NIvud

NIVUS

IVIMHL

NIvud

NIV

NIV

NIVYUS

NIV

NIWUS

NIvyud

LV2MHL

oooT

oos Ort ay

oooT

00S Ott o¢€

OoOT

00S o7T of oooT

00S oct of

“HLAWIZY

S327u99q0 06

oooT

00S Orz Ort 09 o¢ st

eto

90°90 00°0

$0°'o

sto

70°O

€c"o

€i°0

bL°O

rL°O

Vauv

GQgLNaSaud

OotT

octt

OoTT

OSTT

ogot

o90T

osot

OvoT

obbo

otbo

OzrO

OoTbo

aHVN

LNAINOAGWOD

SVFJYV

FTAVUYININA

AIONIS

TWLINAWAIYONT

LNINOGWNOD

LOHS

JIONIS

® LoIdSV

WIWLLY

NOISSIW

AWOOALVS

ITIn

IWLOL

LOHS

JIONIS

tT W1Im

NI SV3YVY

GALNISAYd

LNAINOdGWOD

ITAVUANINA

T e&

VOUW

QILNAISTYd

IWLOL

“HLAWIZY

SIqu9qd

06 a

LIAMSWY

WOVLLY

WOMEADTA, 0 YMUIZY

06 : JadIA

JO WSUISsIssY

LUVAOD

JO SUNSON

ZT SGEL

81

Page 89: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

60°9O g0°0

90°06 z70°0

t0°0 £0°0 to'o £0°0 z70°0 Z0°0 20°70 00°0 60°0 60°0 60°0 oro Z0°0 70°0 T0°0 T0'O 9T"0 v1"0 10°90 vo'o OT"o ot'o oto oT" 0

z7T°O zt°O

zt" Oo

zt’ 0

€0°0

70° 0

00°0

00°0

66°90 66°0

66°90 L6°0

O00sT

€ LYvaood

80°00 60°0

90°0

zo°0

€0°0

£0°O

£0°0

€0°0O z70°O 20°0

£0°0

o0°O

60°0

60°90 60°90 or°o

z70°0O z0°0

z0°O

00°0

9T°O

bT*o

eo°o

bo°O

oT" oO

ot's

OT’o

oTt*o

wT" 90

zt'o

77°70 z7r°o z70°0O €0°o

00°0

00°0

66°90 66°90 66°0

£6°0

oooeT

20-0

60°0

90°90 co"

0

£0°0

to°o

£0°o

t0°O

z70°0 z70°0 £0°0o To"Oo 60°90 60°0

60°90 oTt"o £0°O

0°90

z70°O Ta°O

9T°O

€1° 0

L£o°0 bo°Oo or-o

ot*o

OT‘ oO

ot’o

wT" Oo

zt’ Oo

z71°o zt°o

90°90 z70°0 00°O

00°0O

€6°0

66°90 66°0

L6°0

O00zT

90°90 80°0

L£o°o £0°O

£0°o

€0°0

£0°0

co°0

z70°O z70°0 £0°0

00°90 60°0

60°0

60°0

60°90 €o°o

€0°0

zo°o

To°'0 97°38 tt’ o

Lo°o

bo°o

oT’ oO

oT°o

OT" 0

oT’ o

zt" 0

zt" o

zt°o

tT" Oo

Lo°o

£o°0

00°0

00°90

66°0

66°0

86° 0

96°90

ooottT

90°0

a)

L0°0O bo'o

bo°oO €0°0

£0°O

£co°o

zo°o

70°0

z70°0O to-oO 60°0

60°0

60°0

60°0

£0°0

£9°0

zt0°O Ta°o

9T° 0

Tr*O

£0°0

boo

or’o

OoT*o oT*o

or'o

zT° 0

zt'o

71°90 z1°0

60°06 FO0°O 00°o

00°0

66°0

66°0

£6°0

96°90

0000

O432

OL O¥3Z

OL OuaZ

OL OuaZ

OL

90°60 90°90 90°90 PO°O

O¥32

OL ¥O°O

to°o

too

£0°0

zo°o

z0°0

zo°o

10°90 60°90 60°0

60°0

60°90 €0°0

£0°o

z0°0

o0°0

st°o

TT°90 90°90 bo'o

oT’o

oT"o

oT°O

oT'o

zT°O

zt*o

zT°o

qT‘ Oo

OT" Oo

Lo°0

00°6

00°90 O¥3Z

OL 66°0

66°0

L6°90 s6°0

T 0006

WN

Twn0a

Twnba2

AWNDda

£0°0

90°90 so-o

$o°0

Twnog

voO"O £0°0

€0°0

£0°0

z70°0 zo°0

z70°0 To°O

60°0

60°0

60°90 60°O

£0°O

€0°0

zo’o

To°o

bT°o

oT*O

90°90 to°o

oT"o

oT"o

ot°o

or’o

zT°0O zT°O

zT°O

zt"o

oT°o

oTt‘o 00°0

00°70 IWND3

66°90 66°90 L£6°90 $6°O

a008

(QNOD3S

Wad

L332)

3945

NOTLIVAR79

$33uD3qa

0

sr

SI

st

$I

st

Vauv

VWauv

VauUVv Vauyv

90°90 90°90 $0°o

g0°o

Vauv

£0°0

b0°O

fo°o

to0°o z0°0

z70°90 z0°0

T0°o

60°0

60°0

60°90 60°90 £0°o

£0°0

z7o°o To0°O cto

oT’ oO

$o0°o0 bo°’o oT" oO

oT’ o

oT’o

OoT°o

zT° Oo

77°90 7T"o

z7T°O or’o

oT’o

00°90 00°0

Vauyv 66°0

66°O

c6°0

£6°0

000d

2TVAVUINTAA

STEVUANTNA

37V9VUANINA

ATAVUINTNA

so°o

$o0°O 90°0

so°0

so°o

so°o

90°0

To"O

STAVUaANINA

£0°0

£0°O

to°o

£0°oO fo°o

fo°o

€0°0

z70°Oo z70°0

z0"90 z0°0

70°0

z70°O z0°0

To°9O o0°0

60°0

60°90 60°0

60°90 60°0

60°0

60°O

60°0

to°o

z0°O

70°90 To°Oo

too

T0°6

To°o

00°0

80°O

Fo°°o £070

bo°o

so°o

co°o

bo°O

00°Oo or’o

oT*o

oT"o

a

oT°o

oT" oO

oT°6

ot’ o

tT" 0 z71°O

zt" 0

zt" oO

71°70 Tt"o0

1t’o

TT oO

oT"O

so°o

60°0O 060°90

00°90 00°0

00°90 00°0

IVAVUAINTNA

£6°0

$6°0

£6°0

z76°0 S6°0

76°0

76°0

ce-0

ooas

ooo€

ovud

OVUd

ovya

Ova

OvUd

OVud

ovuda

oOVud

OVua

oOvud

OVUa

ovud

OVUd

ovud

Owud

NIVUD

NIVYES

NIvud

NIVud

NIvaod

NIVUD

NIvud

NIVUD

NIVUD

NIVvuo

NIVvuo

NIVUD

NIVUS

NIWYUo

Nivus

NIVUS

NIvus

NIVUd

NIVUD

Nivuo

NIVUS

NIvuod

NIVUS

NIVUO

Nivud

NIWuo

Nivuo

NIWVUD

NIVUS

NIVUO

NIivad

NIVUO

NIVUS

NIiwuo

NIVUS

Nivad

NIwud

NIwud

NIVUS

NIWud

LVIWHL

O00!

00S ozT oft

ao0T

aos OzT

oooT

00S o7T o¢ oooT

o0s OeT o€ oooT

00S o7T

ooaot 00S ozT Of oo0T

00S ozT o¢

GooT

00S ort Of ooOoT 00S o7zT o¢

oooT

00S OzT of

“HLOWIZY

S33uD90

06

ceo

ec" 0

et" 0

tt" 0

90°90

boo

oT" 0

90°0

Bz° 0

oT"o

€T°o

90°T

Vauv

Q3IN3S3ud

Oboe

Otoe

ozZ0€ OTOE

ossT

OLbT

O9PT

OSbT

ObbT

OzrT

OTbrT

OOPT

O6ET

OSsttT OvET

Ot?ZT

GWYN

LNINOdWOD

eB LIIGSVY

WOVILY

(ponunuoD) UWOHeAsy, 0 UMUNZY

(06 - dIA

JO WOUISSASSY

LUVAOO JO

SIMSON ZT

OEL,

82

Page 90: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

0z°O

oz°0

az°0

oz°0

oz'o

07°90 az°a

az°o

oz°9o cTt’o

OWYs

NIVYD

OO0T

02°90 02°0

0z2°O oz"o

02°0

oz°0O 02°90

oz°O

0z7°0 Lt‘o

OWUd

NIVYD

00S 0z°90

07°90 oz°0

07°90 oz"o

oz°0

0z°0

07°90 oz°0

et‘o

OWUd

NIWUD

O7T st°o

6T°0

6T°O

6T°O

6T* 90

6T°O

6T° 0

st‘o

et’o 00°90

OWudd NIVHOD

OF €z°o

0059

st‘o

St°o

st°o

st°o

st°o

st°o

st°o

$T°0

sT"o

sto

Ova

NIVUSD

OOOT

eT" oO

st‘o

st°o

st°o

sTt°9o st‘o

sTt°o st°o

st’°o bT"o

OWUA

NIVHUSD 006

eto

eto

et"o

bt°o

oto

yt°o

€t"o

eto

et'o

g0°0

OvVudd NIWUS

OZ

ort*o oT"o

oTt"o ot'o

ot‘o

ot"o

ot’o

oT" oO

60°90 s0°o

Owud

NIvVUS

oF sT*o

OSsT9 OUGZ

OL TWADT

SI VIUW

ATEVUANINA

€0°0

oOeT9 £o'O

€0°o

go°o0 €0°O

€0°0

€o0°o €0°0

£0°O

£0°0

£0°O

OWuUd NIVYS

QOOT

€0°0

t0'o

fo°o

£0°0

£0°0

€0°0

€0°0

£0°90O to°o

t0’°o OvVdd

NIVUD

006 €o'a

£0°O

to°0

£0°0o €0°0

€0°0

£0°O

£0°O

£0°O

z70°O Ovdd

NIVUD

O7T £0°0

£0°0

£0°0

£o°o

£0°O

€0°o

£0°0

£0°O

T0°O

00°0

OVdd

NIVUYD

O€ £0°O

9219

fo°o

€0°0

€o°o

£0°0

£o°0

£0°0O €0°O

£0°0

€0°0

z0°0

OvVudd NIVUD

OOOT

€0°0

€0°O

£0°O

£070

€0°0

to°o

to°0

€0°90 €0°9O

zo'o

OVd4a NIVUD

OOS €o°o

€0°0

£0°0

£0°o

£0°0

£0°0

€0°0

z0°0

z70°O z0°0

OVUI

NIVUD

O2Z7T 70°O

z0°0

70°O

zo°O

z0°0

z0°0

z0°O

z0°0

70°70 00°0

OVA

NIVHUOD OFC

£0°o

oTtg9 z0°O0

z70°0 z0°0

z70°O £0°0

£0°90 £0°0

fo°Oo £0°O

z70°0 OVdd

NIVUYSD OOOT

zoo

zo°0

z70°9o z6°O

z70°0 co°o

€0°0

€o°'o zo°o

z70°O OvVuda

NIVYD

00S z70°O

z70°O z70°O

zo°o

z0°0

z70°0 z0°0

zo°o

10°90 ¥0°O

OVds

NIVUSD

OZT 00°90

00°°O 00°90

00°0

00°0

00°0

00°00 00°0

00°90 00°0

Ova

NIVYD

O€ 90°90

00T9

OWaZ

OL IWNOD

SI VAY

ATAVUYSNINA

o0°o

Orzs

O32

OL IWNOA

SI VAUW

ATAVUANINA

00°0

OfTS

OUgZ

OL IVNNOZ

ST WINN

ATAVHANINA

To"o

oze@s OuUdZ

OL IVNOI

SI VAY

ATGVUININA

To’0

oTtzs Ou¥9Z

OL IVWNSA

SI VAYV

ATAVYSINTNA

£z°0O ObTS

O432

OL IWNOD

SI VIUN

ATAVUANINA

so°o

OeTts so°o

00°90 00°0

00°0

00°90 00°00

o0°0

00°90 00-0

00°0

OWUd

NIVUOD

OOOT

00°0O 00°0

oo°o

00°9O 00°O

00°9o 00°9

06°90 00°90

00°70 OWE

NIVYD

00S 00°O

o0°O

00°O

00°0O 00°0

00°O

00°90 o0°0

60°90 o0°°0

OWUd

NIVUD

OTT 00°90

00°90 00°0

00"O

00°90 00°90

00°90 00°90

00°90 00°90

SWUd

NIVUOS

OF a

| O2TS

OU3Z

OL TWNOA

SI VAN

ZTaVUaNTAA

60°90 Ove’

04322 OL

IWNOA

SI VAY

JAIBVUANINA

60°0

OEE

OW9Z

OL IWNDA

SI VSUV

BTAVHANINA

To"o

OTEE

OW4Z

OL ‘IVNDA

SI V3YN

3TAVUANINA

To'o

oret

OU3Z

OL IWNOA

SI WAV

ATAVAANINA

ot*o

ONZE

OUdZ

OL IVASA

SI VAUV

ATAVMAINTOA

OoT"o Otze

OuUdZ OL

IWNEA

STI VAYV

B2TGVUINTNA

60°0

orze

OUdZ

OL TIWNGA

SI VAY

ITAVHININA

60°90 OTZE

Oouzz2 OL

TWNOFI

SY VSYV

3ITAVUININA

z0°O

OvTe

OuaZ

OL IWNSA

SY VAYW

ATAVUANINA

zo°o

ocTte OUdZ

OL TWHOD

SI WANN

JTAVHAININA

To"o

O@TE

OudZ

OL IWNOA

SI VAUW

FTGVHINTOAA

T0°0

OTTE

OOOST

O0OOfT OOO07TT

OOOTT

O000T

0006

ooos

0008

0900S ooor

Waudv SWYN

(GQNO33S5 udd

£2333) Qagads

LVIUHL

QQLNASaud

LNINOAIWOD

NOTLVAR19

saayogd

o “HLAWI2Y

S494¥990

06 *

LI2dSV

WOYLLV

¢ LuvaAod

(panunuod) WOneATY, 0 Y

INUNIZY,

06 - JOdTA

JO JOUISSISSY

LUVAODIO

SINSOY ZT

Ode,

83

Page 91: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

ét"@

9T°O

9T°O

et°o

or‘o

Le*o

9f°0

oto

L9°0

£9°0

49°90 69°90 £o0°0o £o°o

£0°0

£0°9O z7T°

0 eta

wt" 0

ot’o

se°o

st‘o

se°o

ze’ 0

z70°0 z70°Q To"O

00°0

£0°90 £o°o

£0°0

£0°0

€1°o

eto

eto

Tr" O

62°90 67°90 62°90 97°0

z70°O z0°"0 z0°0

z0°0

oa0sT

¢ LYuvaoo

éT°O

9T°O

9T°9O et" o

6¢°0

te°o

9€°0

oc’o

L9°a

“9°0

tg9°0 99°0

€0°0

£0°0

£0°O

£0°0

wT" Oo

z7r’°o zt‘

0 TT’6

st°o

st°o

s¢°o

ce°o

z70°*0 z0°0

z0°0

o0°0

€0°O

€o°O

£0°90 €0°O

£1" 0

et"o

€1t°o Tt" oO

62°90 67° 0

62°90 L£t°0 z70°O z70°O to°o

70°0

aooott

ct'o

9T°O

9T'O

eT" 90

ee’ Oo

L£e'o 9£°O

TT" a

st°o

st*o

st°o

00°0

€0°O

£0°o0 €0°0

£0°0

eTt"o £Tt"o eT" o

Tt" oO

6Z2°O 6Z2°0 6z7°0 cz°0

z0°0

z0°0

70°90 z0°O

000T7T

et*o

9T°0

9T°O

et’o

s¢'o

ce°o

9t°0

6z°0

£9°0

L£9°0 L9°0

99°90 €0°0

€0°0

€0°0

g0°0O z7t°o zt‘o

71-90 TT"o

se€°o st°o

st°o

bEe°o z70°O zo°"Oo z0°O

00°90 £o°o

€o0°0 £0°0

£0°0

€Tt°o eto

€T°o

Tt’o

62°90 67°0

62°0

tz°O0 w0°O

z0°0

z70°0 z0°O

OOOTT

ét°o

9T°0

9T°O

€r’o

z1°o0

se"o

st*o

be-o

z70°0 z70°O zo°0

00°0O £0°9o £0°0

£0°0

£0°O

et°o

€t‘o

eT" oO

Tt" 9o

6Z°O

67° 0

62°90 £z°0

70° O

z70°0 z0°O

z70°O

QO00T

dT‘o

9T° 90

st°a

€Tt"0o tt’o

ct°o

se°o

67°

L9°0

L9°0

L£9°0 99°90 £0°0

€0°0

£0°0

£0°0

zT"Oo z7t*o zt°o

tito

st‘o

st°O

set°o re"oO z0°0

zo°'o z70°O To"O

£0°0

€£0°O €0°0

€0°0

€T°o

€T"o

£1" oO

IT’o

62°0

67°0

67°0

97°90 zo0°o z70°0 z70°O z0°o

0006

ét'o

9T°90 st'o

et*o

ct’o

ce°Oo ge°0

ez°0

£9°0

£9°0

L93°0 99°90 to0°o £0°0

£o°0

£0°0

z7T°0 zF°o

z7t‘o tr" oO

st"o

se°o

st°o

PEO

z70°0 z70°0 z0°

0 To°o

£0°0

£o°O

€o°0

£0°0

tt"o

tt"o

eT’o

TT" oO

6z7°0 67°70 6z°0

97°0

z0°0

z70°0 z70°0 z70°0

0008

(QNOD3S

U3d

L934)

AAads

NOILWAITS

sagzguoad

Oo

L£T°o 9T°

0 st°o

eT" oO

cet*oa ee°o

be"o

st"o

L£9°0 L£9°0 L£9°0 €9°0

€0°0

€0°0

£0°0

£0°0

tT° 0

zr°o

tT" oO

oro

se°o

st°o

se°o

Teo

z70°0 zo0°0 zo°0

To°o

to°o

£070

£0°0

£0°90 et‘*o €et’o zr-o

Tt’o

6Zz°0 67t° 0

@z7°0

éT"o

9T°O

st’o

et’o

ce-a

9£°0

ze°0

97°0

t9°0

i9°0

o9°0

9¢°0

t0°0

€0°0

£o°o

To"o

zt" 0

zr-o

z7t"o 60°0

st-0

st°o

be*o

a7°0

z0°0

z7o°0 z70°O z70°0 £0°O

£0°0

o-oo

£0°O

€T°o

et"o

z7t°o oTt"o

6z7°0 67°0

L£z°O 0z°0

z0°96 z0°0

z70°O z7o°0

000s

LT°9

9T°O0 bT'O

Tt" oO

9€°9

e€°o

st°o

Tt"0

es"o

cs°o

6%°0

00°0

£0°0

€0°O

z0°O

00°0

oTt'o oro

go'o

00°o

of’o

67°O

st°o

00°9O z70°0O z0°O

z70°0 z0°O

€0°0

£0°0o £0°0

£0°o

£t°o

et’o

TT’ oO

g0°0

sz°0

b2°0

TZ°0O 00°90 z0°0O z70°O z™0°O zo°O0

OOO€

OWud

OvVua

oOWud

oVUd

OV

OVA

oOWwud

ovud

OVud

Svud

OV

oOVUd

oWad

OV

ovud

OWUd

oWUd

NIvud

NIVud

NIvao

NIwyu9

NIvas

NIvad

NIwud

NIvad9

NIwuo

NIVYHS

NIvuad

Nivud

NIVaS

NIVHS

NIwusd

Nivad

Niwud

NIVHS

NIvyd

NIVUS

NIvus

Nivyd

NIvad

NIwu9d

NIvyd

NIvwus

NiIvao

NIwua9

NIwus

NIVUd

NIWuS

NIvud

NIWUS

NIWwyS

NIWuo

NIWyuo

Nivuwo

NIWVYUS

NIVUSD

NIvuo

NIWYS

NIWUS

NIWUD

NIWUS

LVAIWHL

OoOoT 00S oct oc ooot

00S OzT

oooT

ooS OzT ot ooot

00s ozT oft oooT

00S ozT

oooT

00s ozT o¢ oaoT

00s ozT of OoOoT 00s ozT o¢ oooT

00S ozT

OO0OT 00S ory of oo0T

00S oct Of

“HLOWIZY

Saauoga

06

66°O

0299

€b'0

0199

$9°0

0999

£0°O

0599

zt"o

Ovo9o

st°o

ot99

£0°0

0299

i)

oT99

€1° 0

a9c9

te°0

0SS9

90°90 OTS9

Wauv

aWWN

Q3LNaSaud

LNINOAWOD

= L39dSY

YOVLILV

(PanupuoD) WoReAsy,

0 UINUNIZY 06 - TadIA IO

WOUISSOSSY LUVAOD

JO SIMSON

TZT OMEL

84

Page 92: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

az°0

92°90 6T°o

£0°0

oz7'9o 02°90 90°90 £0°90O gz°0

sz°0

80°90 so°o

ez°0

£770

60°90 z70°O €z°0

€z7°0 60°0

£0°9O

Lz°0

Lz°0

60°0

bo'o

$z°0

bz°0

£0°0

too

Sz°o0 bz° 0

st°o

z70°O bz°O

b2°O

zz°O0 tTo0°O eto

BT" Oo

st" oO

TO°O

62°70 gz°0

ez°0

so'o

60°0

e0°0

T0°O

To0°0 sz" Oo

97° 0

Lt*o

z0°O

ooost

(ponurjuod)

Lz°0

Lz-"90 te79o 00°90 oz"o

07°96 6t"9a zo°0

9z°90 97°6

£z°0

so°o

bz°0

¥z°0

£z°0

£0°0

bz°o

pz°0

z2°0

eO"O

87°90 ez" Oo

seo

$o°o

St°90 se'o

bz-o

£0°0

sto

Sz°o0 €z°0

00°0

'7°O

yz°O

ez°O

z0°0

st°o

sT°o

st°o

€o°o

6Z7°0 67°90 gz°0

so°o

w7Tt’o z7T*o bo°o

o0°'O 62°90 Lz°0

LTt"Oo £0°O

oootT

L£z°0 tz°0

gz°o

€0°O

oz°0

oz°0

6T"O

T0°O

97° 0

92°90 €z°0

to'o

bz°o

rz°0

€z°Oo TO°O

bz" 0

bz°0

zz°0

z70°0 e7°O

ez°o

¥z°O

€0°0

Sz°0

$z"O

be-o

T0°o

$z°0

gz°0

€z°o

z0°0

’z°O

6z°a

vz°0

bo’o

sTt°o et'o

eto

to'o

6Z°0

62°90 ez"

0 ot‘o

eto

zT’°9O 60°O

00°90 62°90 L£z°0 Lt’o

£0°o

o00zT

£z°0

£2°0

97°90 So'o

02°90 Qz°0

6T’°o £0°O

92°90 97° 0

£2°0

£0°o

bz°0

b2°0

ec" 0

z0°0

bz°9

b2°0

zz" 0

zoo

gz° oO

ez°0

st" 0

fo°o

$z°0

$7°0

be" 0

boo

$2°0

$z°0

be2°0 $0°0

vz" 0

6z°a

bz°O

90°90 eto

st" oO

8t°o

90°90 oc"o

67°90 ez°0

zr" Oo

tt" Oo

tt’ o

Tt’o

00°0

97°90 97°0

9T°O

£0°9O

oooTT

Le°a

i a)

Lz°0

tz°0

£z°O

cz°o

£0°0

ot‘o

a)

0z°O

0z°O

oz°o

oz°O

oz"0

$0°0

90°0

92°90 92°90

97°00 9z°9O

bz-O

97°0

$0°0

80°O

bz°O

bet" 0

bz°0

vz-o

€z7°0 bz°O

$0°0O £0°Oo

ez" 0

b7°O

bro

bz" O

zz" 0

b2z°0 g$0°0

£0°0

ec°O0 @Z°O

ez°o

ez"0

97°90 8zZ°0

90°90 g0°0O

St°o

$z°o

c2z°0 $z°0

$z°0

$z°0o 90°0

80°0

gz°0

stz°o G2°0

Sz°0

Gz°0

Sz°0

£0°0

60°90 bz°0

bz°0

bz°o

be°o

be°O0 bZ°0

80°O

60°90 eto

gE°o

gt"o

sT°o

eT" 0

eT"o

co°0

80°O

oc*o

oft"o ot"

Oo of°o

6z2°0 oe°O

et°o

sT°o

OuaZ

OL

eto

bt*o

ero

£T°o

60°0

tt"o

Ta" 9

TO0°O az°o

8zZ°0 97°90

Sz°o

st°o

bt"o

£0°o

£0°9O

O000T

0006

(QNODUS

uad

L934)

Lz-0

it*o

cz"o

z7rt'o 0z°0

oz*o

oz°o

g0°9O 9%°O

92°O

92°0

OT" oO

bz-0

67°70 bz°0

60°0

67°90 '2°0

bz°O

60°0

sz°0

gz7°0

ez" 0

tt-oa Sz°o

sz°o

S2°0

oT’ Oo

$z°0

$z°0

sz°o

Tt’°o be-o

Fz°O

rz" 0

TE"O

gt°a

et"o

eto

60°0

oc’o

ot*o

oc’o

ct"0

INNOS

SI et°o

€t"o

et" o

so°0

tez-0 bZ°O

eT" o

to°o

0008

qagdas

NOTLVAGIZ

Saauogad

oO

Lz°o

Lz°0

tz°o

fT" O

07°90 0z°0

0z°O

or"o

97°90 92°90 97°90 z1°0

bz°o

bz°0

b2°0

Tr" oO

6z°0

bz7°O bz°0

TT" oO

87° 0

sz°o

8z°O

€t°o

$7°0

Sz°0

sz°o

z7T°90 Sz°90

sz°0

$z°0

et’o

bz°o

eet°o bz°O

eto

gt*o

sTt°o 8T*o

oto

or°o

o£°O

o¢c’o €z°0

Wav

bto

£T"o

eT"O

90°90 sz°0o £770

TE" 0

£0°0

o00L

iz" 0 £z°0

iz" o

Lt" o

cz°0

bz-0

ez°0

bz"0

0z°O

ot" 0

07°90 oz-oa

oz°o

6T°9O 91°90

6T*0

92°90 97°0

97°90 9$z°6

92°90 97°O

st°o

tc°o

bt°O

6z°0

0 vz"o

bz°0

'z"0

Lt"O

€z7° 0

bZ°0O bZ°O

bZ°O

bz°O

'7°0

a

9T° 0

zo

sz°0

8z°oO ez°0

sz°o0 ez°0

92°90 02°90

bz'Oo sz°o

Gz-o

Gz°"0 sz°o

$7°0O be"

07°90 ’=°O

gt°0

St°0

sz°oa stz*o

$z° 0

€2°O

£z°0

£z°O

bz° 0

bz-o

7°90 ez-°a

bz°0a z7z°o

z7z"0 zz°0

eTt°o eT" Oo

8t°O

eT°o

ero

gTt-o st°o

eT°o

ot°a

or*o

ot°o

ez°0

az°o

Lz°O

Lt°0

Lz°0

STQVHANINA

eT°oa eto

et°o

zT° 0

bT‘O

zTt°o s0°o

zT"0

ez"o

ero

gto

zTt°o #0°0

s0°0

€0°90 z0°O0

0006

ooo€f

OWN

Ovdd

oOVdd

OWUd

OWdd

Owdd

oOwdd

oOVud

“HLAWIZY

Nivad

NIVYS

Nivus

NIVHS

Niwud

NIVUDS

NIVHUS

NIVYES

NIVYD

NIvyud

NIvus

NIVYUS

NIVUSD

NIivyao

NIWyasd

NIVUS

NIVAS

NIWVYS

NIVYD

NIvyod

NIVUS

NIvyod

NIVUS

Nivud

NIVvad

NIWYUd

NIVYWSD

NIWHS

NIVUS

Nivad

NIvyad

NIVUYS

NIVWuod

NIvysd

Nivas

NIVUS

NIvud

NIVYS

NIvyad

NIVYS

NIvy9d

NIVud

NIVYUS

NIV¥d

NIwao

NIVYS

NIVYS

NIWUd

NIVuUd

NIVYS

Niwus

NIVUS

LYVJUHL

oooT

00S

ozt

oft

oooT

00s

ott

ooot

00S OzT OF oo0T

00s ozT ot oooT

00s oct o¢ Oo0T

00S oz

oooT

00S OzT oft 000T

00S ozt of oooT

00s OzT Of oooT

00s oz

ot oooTt 00s ozt of

oooT

00S oct oe oooT

00s oer o¢

S4A394990

06

L7°O

07°0

92°90

be°O

7°90

az°o

$z°0

sz°o

a)

et"o

LTt°o

ge°o

VWauv

a3 LN9Saud

OTT

oo0zF

O6Tb

OsTd

OLTP

O9Te

OSTe

OFT

OCT

O7Te

OTT

OOoTb

osTs

ooTs

IWWN

LNINOdWOD

SB LIASY

WOVLLV

UOTTCAD 0 WINUIZY 06

: FOdIA JO

WSUIssISSV LUVAO.

JO SUMSOM

-Z1 OGeL

85

Page 93: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

oT" oO

Ito

$0°O

To°O

ooosTt

et’o

tr" 9

90°90 Toa°o

OOOtT

pT’o

zt’o

90°90 To’°Oo

oo00zt

LT’o

ct"@

Lt‘o

90°90 ze°0

Te" 0

Te" oO

90°90 97°9

92°0

97° 0

To°O

6T°o

6T° oO

6t"o

10°

0005S

€ Luvaos

eT°o

et"o

90°90 To"o

oooTT

bT'o

€t'o

L£o°0 T0°O

oooot

sTt°o b1'o

L£o°0 To°9

0006

sTt°o gta

90°90 t¥o"0

0008

{(QNOD3S

Had

1334)

QAgds

ct°o

Lt°o

et"o

g0°O

ze’ Oo

ze" 0

Te"o

or'o

92°0

92° 0

97°0

vo°o

6T° 0

6T°0O 6T° 9

z0°O

T ooo€

eT"o

éTt’o cto

60°0

z7£°O0 zEe°0 Te€°o TTt°o 97°O

97°0

97°0

90°90 6T°O

6T° 0

6t"o

£0°9

I 0002

Lt°o

LTt’o Lt'o

ot’o

ec" 0

ze" 0

Te"o

tt" o

97° 9

97°90 97°90 80°90 6T°O

6T°O

61° 0

soo

IT Q00T

(Laaza

auvnds)

Lt'"o ét°o

LT"o

zT°O

et*o

€e°o

ze°o

sT’0

97°90 92°0

97°0

oT'9

6T°0

6T°9O 6T°9

90°90

T oOooOo0

Pr-O

zT"o

90°90 To" 9

O00L

zt’°o ot" oO

so°o

z70°0

0006

60°90 20°90 z0°O

To"o

QOoE

OWud

ova

Ovad

OvVUdd

NIVYS

OOOT

NIVWHS

00S

NIwuS

o7Zf

NIwuo

o€ 76°90

IO¥LNOD

To diy

Vauv

3WVN

AWOOa LVS

LVIWHL

QaLNasaudd

dnoud

19m

(SVA4N

SIGVYININA

LAOUVL

IVLOL

FHL

NI GdQNISNI

BUY

SLIASAY

AISIHL)

et’o

Lt’ o

LTtT*9 sT°0

eet" 0

te" 0

ze" Oo

tt" 0

92°0

9z° 0

97°90 zT° 90

6T°* 9

6T°O

6T°0

g0°O

T 0006

(QNODUS

uad

L394)

st°o

et°o

sTt"o

Lt’o

t£°o

€€°O

ee°o

oz°O

92°0

97°0

97°36 eT°oO 6T°O

6t"o

6T°O

60°0

0008

aqads

st°o

0004

SdNOHD

BTAWHANINA~ATAGILINW

40

SYZHVW

ZIRVYANINA

LOHS

2IONIS

g1°o

ct*o

OVYI

NIVHOD

OOOT

st°o

Lio

OVuUI NIVYD

0056 Lt*o

LT" o

OVA

NIWVYD

O7T cT‘o

at°o

OVuUd NIVHO

OF ato

OSZzb €¢°o

€e°o

OVUd

NIVUD

OOOT

et" 0

Te°o

OVWUd NIVYD

OOS Te°o

Te"0

OVUA

NIVUD

OTT Te

"oO Te°o

OVud

NIVYOD

OF €e°0

OrZF

92°0

92°0

OWUd

NIVHD

OOOT

97° 0 92°90

OVud

NIVHS

00S 92°90

e290 OVad

NIVHSD

O27 tz"

0 €z°0

OWdd

NIWUD

OF 97°90

OCehb 6T‘o

6T°O

OWH4A NIVYD

OOOT

6T"O

6T°0

OVud

NIVYD

00S 6T"

0 6T°O

SWUd

NIVUS

O7T 6T°0

6T"O

OVdd

NIVED

OF 6T°O

O%tb

000S

ooo€

Vay

JWYN

LVIUNL

Q3LNaSaud

INAINOdGWOD

NOLTLVARSTI

S$a9ud7a

oO “HEAWI2V

S33499d

06 =

LIZdSV

NOVILIV

(panuNuoD) WONEASTA, 0 GMUNIZY,

0G - JOdTA

JO MWOUISSISSY

LUVAODIO

SiNsoy “CL

Ole.

86

Page 94: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

z70°O zoo

zo°o

z70°0 10°O

to'o

00°90 o0°0

tt-o

Trt’o eto

zt" oO

et"o

€t° Oo

co0°'0 80°90

10°0

zo°o

To°O

z0°0

z0°0

z0°0

00°O

90°70 bo0°O

to'o

bO°O

bOo°O so°o

$0°0

T0°O

zo'0

OOOST

O00tT

£ LdvVAod

z70°0 70°0

z7O0°O 00°o

tr"o

tt°o

€t°o

g0°O

70°O

zo" 0

70°O

o0°0

bo°o

bo" O

so°o

z0°O

ooozt

€a°0

€o°0

ae)

00°0

oT" a

TT°O

zT° 0

60°0

zo°o

z0°0

z70°0 00°0

6o°O

bo°o

s0°o

£0°O

OOOTT

z70°0 £0°9O zo°0a 00°90 80°90 ot’o

zT"9o 60°90 z70°O z70°0 z0°0

00°90 bo°o

po" Oo

$o0°0 €0°0

0000T

£0°O

£070

zo°o

00°0

90°90 60°0

zt’ oO

60°90 z70°O z0°0

70°70 00°90 bo-o

boo

$0°0

£0°o

0006

£0°0

£0°0O

To’o

o0°O

90°0

80°90

z7T° Oo

60°90

zo°7O0

zo°0

z0°O

00°0

’O°O

Fo" Oo

s0°o

to0°o

0008

(QNO33S

U3d

L994)

aagus

NOITSSIW

a)

z70°0 70°O

00°O

90°0

e0°0

TtT"o 60°O

z0°0

t0°0

z0°0

o0°o

vo'o

boo

$0°0O

eO°O

0004

TOUTIN

z70°O z70°0 T0°O

00°0

90°90 s0°O0 TT°o

Tt" 0a

z0°Oo z70°0 70°70 00°O

vo"o

$0°O

s0°0

so0°o

000S

4od

70°70

owud

z7o°0

Ovdd

00°90

owud

T0°

0 Ove

TT"

a OWUd

or’o

Ova

Tt°o

owud

$0°0

Ovud

z70°O

OV

z70°O

OoVud

00°90 OWUd

00°oO OVA

60°0O ovVud

bo°o

Svua

$o°o

OV

00°90 oVdd

ooot

(1434

aguvnds)

NIVWYUS

OO00T

NIVHYS

006

NIWuo

O7T

NIVYS

Of TSs°0

UVLSOT

NIWUS

OOOT

NIVUS

006

NIWUS

O?7T

NIWuUS

OF TS°0

LYOdO1

NIWHYS

OO00T

NIWYS

00S

NIVYUS

O2T

NIvuo

Of a

uVIsdn

NIVUD

OOOT

NIvuS

00S

NIWYS

OZT

NIVYS

OF tbo

Luodqdn

Vauv

aWVN

LVAYUHL

aa LN4AS3aud

LNINOdWOD

SVGYV

AIGVYUIANTNA

ATMILINW

WALSKS

(ponunuos) UONCADY O

YINAUZY (06

: OCIA JO

JOUssOssSY TVA OD

JO SIUNSOY

-ZT Olde.

87

Page 95: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Conclusions

The vulnerability of cruise missiles has been examined using the Systems Engineering

Process and Vulnerability Analysis programs. The Definition of Need for vulnerability

analysis was presented. Functional Analysis gave insight into how cruise missiles are

arranged and operate. Failure Analysis addressed how these systems could be defeated.

Finally, the Vulnerability Analysis took into account the physical characteristics and the

results of the Systems Engineering Process to provide an estimate of overall system

vulnerability.

Although the target evaluated in this report is generic, the process followed would work

equally well for other cruise missile systems. In fact, the principles of identifying needs,

defining functions and evaluating failure modes could be applied to the analysis of most

any type of system.

In the future, analysts need to remain aware of trends in the design of cruise missiles, and

the methods needed to defeat them. Fragmenting warheads continue to evolve, yet the

analyst should not limit their efforts to this method. Advances are being made in fields

such as ballistics, flight dynamics, and explosive physics. Application of these advances,

made possible by greater computational capabilities, would allow for more detailed and,

presumably, more accurate vulnerability models.

88

Page 96: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Bibliography

Ball, Robert E., The Fundamentals of Aircraft Combat Survivability Analysis and Design,

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., New York NY, 1985

Blanchard, Benjamin S., and Fabrycky, Wolter J., Systems Engineering and Analysis,

Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1991

Dunnigan, James F., How To Make War, Quill William Morrow, New York NY, 1988

Frieden, David R., Principles of Naval Weapons Systems, Naval Institute Press,

Annapolis MD, 1985

Hooten, E.R., editor, Jane's Naval Weapon Systems, Jane's Information Group, Surrey

UK, 1994

Joint Technical Coordination Group for Munitions Effectiveness, COVART 3.0 - A

Simulation Program For Computation of Vulnerable Areas and Repair Times - User

Manual, 1991

Klinggraeff-Jones, Dorothee C., and Ullyatt, Lawrence G., FASTGEN 3.2

Documentation Manual, Denver Research Institute, University of Denver CO, 1994

Lennox, Duncan, editor, Jane’s Air Launched Weapons, Jane's Information Group, Surrey

UK, 1996

Oates, Gordon C., Aerothermodynamics of Gas Turbine and Rocket Propulsion,

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Washington, DC., 1988

Schleher, D. Curtis, /ntroduction to Electronic Warfare, Artech House, Dedham, MA

1986

89

Page 97: NL ee tL - Virginia Tech

Shaw, Robert L., Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering, Naval Institute Press,

Annapolis MD, 1985

Stimson, George W., [ntroduction to Airborne Radar, Hughes Aircraft Company, El

Segundo CA, 1983

Zarchan, Paul, Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance , American Institute of

Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Washington DC, 1990

90