NJ ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION LEGISLATIVE SCORE CARD · 2019. 12. 16. · NJ Environmental Federation’s New Jersey Legislative Scorecard 2010‐13 The New Jersey Environmental Federation’s

New Jersey Environmental Federation’s 2013 New Jersey Legislative Scorecard NJ Environmental Federation’s New Jersey Legislative Scorecard 2010‐13

The New Jersey Environmental Federation’s Legislative Scorecard 2010‐13 represents a permanent record that scores every NJ state legislator on votes, action and leadership on significant environmental bills between 2010 and 2013. TAKE ACTION! We encourage everyone to praise those legislators who stood up for public health and the environment or seek an explanation from those who voted the wrong way and call on them to Vote Environment now and in the future. Contact your legislators by visiting our website at: www.CleanWaterAction.org/NJScorecard

SCORECARD COMMITTEE Amy Goldsmith, State Director David Pringle, Campaign Director Jenny Vickers, Communications Coordinator Janet Tauro, NJEF Board Chair Sharon Finlayson, NJEF Vote Environment Committee Chair Michael Kelly, National Online Communications Director Eric Benson, Montclair Canvass Director and Field Canvass staff Published July 18, 2013. Available at www.CleanWaterAction.org/NJScorecard New Jersey Environmental Federation, the NJ Chapter of Clean Water Action, is New Jersey's largest grassroots group active on water, energy and environmental health. With 1 million national and 150,000 statewide members, Clean Water Action works for clean, safe and affordable water, prevention of health‐threatening pollution and creation of environmentally‐safe jobs and businesses. Clean Water Action’s nonpartisan campaigns empower people to make democracy work. Clean Water Fund's programs build on and complement those of Clean Water Action. Clean Water Fund’s mission is to develop strong grassroots environmental leadership and to bring together diverse constituencies to work cooperatively for changes that improve their lives, focused on health, consumer, environmental and community problems. Clean Water Fund is a nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax‐deductible to the extent allowed by law.

198 Brighton Avenue, Long Branch, NJ 07740 Phone: 732‐963‐9714 Fax: 732‐963‐9876

[email protected] www.cleanwateraction.org/nj

OUR WATER, OUR HEALTH, OUR FUTURE

New Jersey Environmental Federation’s 2013 New Jersey Legislative Scorecard

Table of Contents

Narrative ……………………………………………………………. 1 Charts…………………………………………………………………. 4 Methodology………………………………………………………. 6 Description and Status of Bill Scored …………………… 7 Scorecard: Senate …….……………………………………….. 9 Scorecard: Assembly ………………………………………….. 11

NJ ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION LEGISLATIVE SCORE CARD 2010‐2013

New LegisScore New Jgeogrdensit

While forefrothe PiMore air and Howeprotecis wel SCOR This Nspons(since The scselectmakin Overa

Envi

T

Jersey Env

slature Unecard Revea

ersey has lonaphy (Highlanty in the U.S.,

New Jersey hont of adoptinelands and wrecently, NJ pd water polici

ver, our prouctions have bl documented

RECARD OVE

NJ Environmenorships, and January 2010

corecard provted committeng the grade,

all, we found:

DemocratsDemocrati

The pro‐enscored – 13 times blo

Time and avotes ‐‐ #’scouldn’t evcomparativ

The NJ LegSandy reco

ironmental a

In 2011, thereof $15,000/stproblems andNJ still flunks 22,000 NJ homClimate chang

Too few "hea“healthy wat

vironmenta

raveling Nals that Mo

ng been heralnds, Pineland and over 100

has often beeng model soluwetlands, cleapassed laws pies. All these h

ud legacy of lebeen put at risd 5, but the St

ERVIEW

ntal Federatioleadership co0 as the gove

vides a compre chairs, and receiving onl

: s scored 59%.c leadership s

nvironment p1 times blockocked by Rep

again, the big s 5, 9, 16 and ven get on thvely smaller i

islature failedovery to fundi

NJ ENVIRO

nd public hea

e were nearly ay. Extreme hd heat stress, ifederal air pomes were left ge will only ma

althy" waterwersheds” the

l Federatio

NJ Traditionost Legislat

ded as a bi‐pds, Jersey Sho0 years of ind

n the first to eutions for othaning up hazarotecting the have proved t

eadership, ansk by our electate Legislatu

on scorecard overing the mernor began h

rehensive evaindividual legy a 48%. But

. Republicansscored 47%. R

osition succeked primarily ublicans’ refu

votes led to 17). In contrae agenda (e.gn scope (e.g.,

d to even seriong for clean e

ONMENTAL

alth safeguar

2,500 hospitaheat and declinncluding premllution standauninhabitableake big storm

ways. Only 22 fish are cont

on’s 2013 N

n of Envirotors Don’t M

artisan envirore, and beingdustrialization

experience ener states and ardous waste, Highlands, retheir weight in

d more impocted officials oure’s is not.

corrects thatmost importanhis term).

aluation of hogislators rate there’s still h

scored 32%.Republican le

eded on onlyby Democratusal to overrid

successful roast, good billsg., safe playin, fertilizer res

ously consideenergy, open s

FEDERATIO

rds are neede

al admissions fning air qualitymature death.ards and has soe by Sandy ands, severe wea

of 952 NJ waaminated. 4

ew Jersey L

onmental SMake the G

onmental leag downwind fn and corresp

nvironmental/nations to foas well as estesponding to tn gold – good

ortantly, thoseover the past

t. It rates all 1nt, representa

ow the legislaon the enviroope!

eadership sco

y 4 of the 18 bs failing to acde the govern

llback of prots struggled tog fields #3 antrictions #13,

r the most sigspace and tra

ON LEGISLA

ed now more

for asthma in y are expecte1 ome of the wod total NJ busther and flood

atersheds me

Legislative

SafeguardGrade

der. This is mrom much ofponding conta

/health problllow. Over thetablishing chethe climate crd for the envir

e critical envit five years. T

120 state legisative environ

ature as a whoonment. Unfo

red 45%.

bills ct and nor’s vetoes o

tections (e.g.,o advance – sond waiver #18, solar #7, and

gnificant solutansportation s

ATIVE SCOR

than ever:

New Jersey atd to increase

orst air in the siness losses ading events m

et all water q

Scorecard

s

mostly out of nf the country)amination of

ems, our state decades, NJemical securitrisis, and advaronment and t

ronmental anhe governor’

slators on themental issues

ole, party cauortunately, to

of bills they’d

, the permit eome even wit8). When theyd offshore wi

tions on criticsuch that they

RECARD 201

t an average crisk of respira

nation.2 re estimated a

more frequent.

quality standa

Overall Leadership

necessity – ou), highest popour land, air a

te has also beeJ passed laws y and the righancing clean ethe economy

nd public heas contributio

eir actions – vs of the past 3

ucuses, its leaoo often, they

d previously su

extension andth majority suy did advanceind #14) 6

al issues fromy can’t even b

10‐13

charge atory

at $8.3 billion.3

ards and even

Dems

59% 347% 4

ur unique pulation and water.

en in the protecting ht to know. energy, cars, .

alth n to this crisis

votes, 3 years

adership, y are not

upported.

d dirty water upport e, they were

m Super Stormbe scored.

.

n in these

Reps

32% 45%

s

m

1

On an

N

Eig

WH

n individual le

Only 2 of tSenate RepOnly 1 Rep

ine (9) legisla

ght (8) of the 1

NJ’s most ethe entire the 12 Rep3 Republic

While the scoHeroes” scori

The 5 legisLD 27th (86

4 mid‐leve‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Even 3 of t‐ ‐ ‐

N

“ENVIRONMAssemblymaSenator SmitAssemblymaAssemblywoSenator WeiAssemblymaSenator Buo

“ENVIRONMSenator SarloSenator OroAssemblymaAssemblywoSenator Doh

NOTABLE LESenate BudgAssembly MAssembly ApSenate Presi

egislator basi

he top 6 legispublican Leadpublican score

ators are deem

15 Democrats t

environmentalegislature. Tpublicans reprans (LD 8) rep

orecard documing over 80%

lative district6%); 37th (86%

l scorers haveAssembly ESenator TurSenate RepSenator Bec

the lower scoSenate PresAssembly MSenator Oro

NJ ENVIRON

MENTAL HEROan McKeon (Dth (D‐17) an Gusciora (Doman Vainierinberg (D‐37) an Barnes (D‐no (D‐18)

MENTAL ZEROo (D‐36) ho (R‐24) an Space (R‐2oman McHoseherty (R‐23)

EADERS IN Dget Chair Sarloajority Leadeppropriationsident Sweene

s, the scoreca

slative leaderder Kean (63%ed over 65%:

med to be “En

op leadership p

ally sensitive he 3 Democrresenting thepresenting th

ments the paon their ove

ts (LD) that sc%); 18th (85%);

e played criticnvironment Crner ‐ safe plaublican Leadeck ‐ fracking,

rers have somsident SweeneMajority Leadeoho ‐ safe pla

NMENTAL F

OES” D‐27)

D‐15) ‐Huttle (D‐38

‐18)

OS”

4) e (R‐24)

DEMOCRATS o (D‐36) er Greenwald s Chair Burziceey (D‐3)

ard illustrate

s scored over%) Senator Kip B

nvironmenta

positions impac

regions are rats represent core of the He core of the

ast 3 years as rall score and

cored the high; 15th (83%); a

cal roles on seCommittee Chaying fields (#er Kean ‐ safesafe playing f

me high notesey ‐ offshore er Greenwaldying fields (#3

FEDERATIO

SCO 10 10 10

8) 9 9 9 9

SCORE (%) 0 0 0 3 10

“BOTTOM 5”

(D‐6) elli (D‐3)

es that:

r 50%: Senate

Bateman at 8

l Zeros”, scor

cting environm

epresented bting Cape MaHighlands (LD Pinelands av

troubling, it d on individu

hest were: and 38th (82%

everal issues6

hair Spencer ‐#3) e playing fieldfields, and fer

s on some keywind (#14), sd ‐ responsible3)

N LEGISLAT

ORE (%)02 01 01 98 97 97 94

) AssembAssembSenatoAssemb

”

e Majority Lea

82%

ring below 15

mental policy sc

by 6 legislativy and the De

D 23‐26) averaveraged 24%.

also spotlighal issues:

%) 6. ‐ environmen

ds and climatertilizer restric

y issues6: solar (#7), ande funding for

TIVE SCORE

AssemblywoSenator GreAssemblywoAssemblymaSenator GorSenator Bat

blyman Carroblywoman Der Kyrillos (R‐1blyman Rible

SCORE 0 29 30 33

ader Weinbe

5%

cored in the “bo

e districts (LDlaware Bayshaged 14% (LD

hts 13 legislat

tal justice an

e change (#2)ctions (#13)

d climate cha open space;

ECARD 2010

oman Wagneeenstein (D‐14oman Jasey (Dan Benson (Drdon (D‐38) eman (R‐16)

oll (R‐25) ecroce (R‐26) 13) (R‐30)

E (%)

rg (97%) and

ottom 5” of the

D) with the whore (LD 1) avD 24 averaged

tors as “Envir

d fracking (#6

)

nge (#8); and

0‐13

SCr (D‐38) 94) 9D‐27) 9D‐14) 8

8 8

SCORE12 13 13 15

eir caucuses.

orst scores inveraged 24%, d 3%), and the

ronmental

6)

2

CORE (%) 94 93 92 88 83 82

E (%)

n

e

MOVING FORWARD

The prolonged economic downturn, the aftermath of Sandy, and the Governor’s record make the NJ Legislature a critical backstop for the environment. It is not too late to reverse course. New Jersey’s core environmental and public health protections, while weakened and reaching the tipping point, remain standing. Actions that the NJ Legislature takes and/or fails to take in the near future will go a long way in determining our state’s fate.

This summer, the Legislature and Governor should work together to:

amend A3680/S2583 to ensure taxpayers don’t subsidize development in the Highlands and Pinelands and climate‐disrupting development everywhere;

ensure open space funding legislation is fiscally responsible and doesn’t result in corresponding cuts to other core government services including the NJ Department of Environmental Protection;

amend S1085 to ensure its standards are enforceable and its intention to improve the health of our public forests is met rather than leads to their continued degradation;

Within the coming year, the Legislature should:

Override bills6 vetoed by the Governor – e.g. frack waste (#6) and regional compact on climate change, RGGI (#8);

Acting on pending bills6 ‐‐ waiver (#18), safe playing fields (#3), environmental justice (S962/A3836), and coastal commission (A3920)

Restore clean energy funding and strengthen water rules We hope this scorecard will serve as a wakeup call to legislators and the voting public. Our goal is to embolden environmental legislative leaders to drive the pro‐environmental agenda; but they cannot succeed without others willing to create a bipartisan, pro‐environment majority. And voters can no longer assume their legislators to be pro‐environment without pressing them to do the right thing. In fact, our past successes became a reality largely because grassroots groups and voters held legislators accountable.

That’s why the New Jersey Environmental Federation, the NJ Chapter of Clean Water Action, will be going door to door educating voters throughout the state and in targeted districts, mobilizing its members on the phone and with direct mail, building coalitions, as well as using new and traditional media to have our voices heard. We will inform the public about their state legislators’ records and next steps needed to slow down and amend the bad bills while advancing pro‐active environmental policies for New Jersey’s future.

Beginning this summer and this year’s election cycle, the Legislature has the opportunity to once again move New Jersey in the right direction—one that benefits our environment, the economy and public health. And NJ Environmental Federation will be there to help. Endnotes: 1. White House Paper: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/state‐reports/climate/New%20Jersey%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf1 2. American Lung Association: http://www.stateoftheair.org/2013/states/new‐jersey/ 3. White House Paper: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/state‐reports/climate/New%20Jersey%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf 4. Asbury Park Press via the NJDEP: http://www.app.com/article/20120116/NJNEWS/301160037/Few‐healthy‐waterways‐New‐Jersey 5. Governor Christie’s Report Card: http://www.cleanwateraction.org/reportcardnj 6. The pound (#) sign with one or more numbers following it reference one or more of the 18 bills scored, descriptions of which can be found

on pages 7‐8 3

NJ ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD 2010‐13

Top

Botto

Top a

Top a

Top a Top a

ASSJohReeValePetCon

ASSDavBettMicAlisPar

TOPBobLoreBarLindRob

TOPChrJenThoDiaJam

TOPBriaDiaHolDavSco

TOPJohReeValPetCon

5 Legislato

om 5 Legis

and Botto

and Botto

and Botto

and Botto

SEMBLY n McKeon (Ded Gusciora (Derie Vainieri Her Barnes (D‐nnie Wagner (

SEMBLY vid Rible (R‐30ty Lou Decrocchael Pattrick son McHose (ker Space (R‐

P b Smith (D‐17etta Weinberbara Buono (da Greensteinbert Gordon (

P ristopher Batenifer Beck (R‐omas Kean Jr.ne Allen (R‐7)

mes Holzapfel

P an Rumpf (R‐9nne Gove (R‐ly Schepisi (Rvid Wolfe (R‐1tt Rumana (R

P hn McKeon (Ded Gusciora (Derie Vainieri ter Barnes (D‐nnie Wagner

ors

slators

m Democr

m Republi

m Democr

m Republi

NJ ENVIRO

‐27) D‐15) Huttle (D‐37) ‐18) (D‐38)

0) ce (R‐26) Carroll (R‐25R‐24) 24)

) rg (D‐37) D‐18) n* (D‐14) D‐38)

eman (R‐16) ‐11) (R‐21) ) * (R‐10)

9) 9) R‐39) 10) R‐40)

D‐27) D‐15) Huttle (D‐37)‐18) (D‐38)

rats: SENA

icans: SEN

rats: ASSEM

icans: ASSE

ONMENTAL

SC 10 10 9 9 9

SC 1 1

5) 1

SC 10 9 9 9 8

SC 82 63 63 61 59

SC 60 49 49 46 45

SC 1 1

9 9 9

ATE

ATE

MBLY

EMBLY

L FEDERATI

CORE (%)02 01 98 97 94

CORE (%)15 13 12 3 0

CORE (%)01 97 94 93 83

CORE (%)2 3 3 1 9

CORE (%)0 9 9 6 5

CORE (%)02 01 98 97 94

ON LEGISLA

SENATE Bob Smith (Loretta WeBarbara BuLinda GreenRobert Gor

SENATE Anthony R. Joseph KyriMichael DoSteven OroPaul Sarlo (

BOTTOMRaymond LStephen SwDonald NorJeff Van DrePaul Sarlo (

BOTTOMJoseph PenAnthony R. Joseph KyriMichael DoSteven Oro

BOTTOMDavid RibleBetty Lou DMichael PatAlison McHParker Spac

BOTTOMJerry GreenNelson AlbJohn BurzicLouis GreenBob Andrze

ATIVE SCOR

(D‐17)einberg (D‐37ono (D‐18)nstein (D‐14)rdon (D‐38)

Bucco (R‐25)illos (R‐13)oherty (R‐23)oho (R‐24)(D‐36)

Lesniak (D‐20)weeney (D‐3)rcross (D‐5)ew (D‐1)(D‐36)

nnacchio (R‐26 Bucco (R‐25)illos (R‐13)oherty (R‐23)oho (R‐24)

e (R‐30)Decroce (R‐26ttrick Carroll Hose (R‐24)ce (R‐24)

n (D‐22)ano (D‐1)chelli (D‐3)nwald (D‐6)ejczak (D‐1)

RECARD 20

)

)

)

6) )

6) (R‐25)

010‐13

SCORE (%101 97 94 93 83

SCORE (% 17 13 10 0 0

SCORE (%46 33 26 22 0

SCORE (%18 17 13 10

0

SCORE (%15 13 12 3 0

SCORE (%34 30 30 29 21

%)

%)

%)

%)

%)

%)

4

Lead

Com

Legis

SENPreMajMin

SENBudComEcoEnv

dership

mittee Ch

slative Dist

NATE sident Sweenjority Leader Wnority Leader

N

NATE dget & Apprommunity & Urbonomic Growtvironment & E

LD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

airs

tricts (Avera

ney (D‐3) Weinberg (D‐3Kean Jr. (R‐2

NJ ENVIRON

priations, Sarban Affairs, Van th, Lesniak (DEnergy, Smith

SCORE (%)

24 36 37 43 45 41 61 24 49 49

age of each L

S 3

37) 91) 6

NMENTAL F

Srlo (D‐36) Drew (D‐1) 2

D‐20) 4h (D‐17) 10

LD SC

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

LD’s 3 legislat

SCORE (%)33 97 63

FEDERATIO

SCORE (%) 0 22 46 01

CORE (%)

43 33 29 75 83 47 73 85 60 53

tors)

ASSEMBLYSpeaker OliMajority LeMinority Le

N LEGISLAT

ASSEMBLYAg and NatAppropriatBudget, PriEnvironmeHousing, GRegulatory Energy, Chi

LD SCO

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

iver (D‐41)eader Greenweader Bramni

TIVE SCORE

t’l Resources, ions, Burzicheeto (D‐32)nt, Spencer (Dreen (D‐22)Oversight, Raivukula (D‐17

ORE (%)

40 52 18 1 20 17 86 56 52 29

wald (D‐6) ck (R‐21)

ECARD 2010

Albano (D‐1)elli (D‐3) D‐29) amos (D‐33) 7)

LD

31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

SCORE (%41 29 27

0‐13

SCORE (%) 30

30 52 62 34 60 71

SCORE (%)

62 53 55 63 50 41 86 82 38 43

5

%)

%)

5

Reading the Scorecard Legislators were scored on the 18 most important, representative environmental bills acted on between 2010 and 2013 including 15 or 16 floor votes (the Senate did not vote on Assembly # 18, the NJDEP waiver rule) and sponsorship of 2 bills (#3 Safe Playing Fields 3 and #4 Repeal of the Global Warming Response Act). They could also receive extra credit and/or demerits for pro‐ and/or anti‐environmental leadership. Votes (85% towards the FINAL SCORE) Legislators’ pro‐environment votes are marked with a plus or positive “+” sign, and their anti‐environment votes received a minus or negative “‐“. As the votes selected require an absolute majority (41 in the Assembly and 21 in the Senate), abstentions are scored the same as a no vote. na = A legislator not in office at the time of the vote nv = A legislator whose absence was noted in the Quorum and their absence was not scored against them. On the other hand, if a legislator was present at the Capitol but chose not to cast a vote, it was counted as an abstention. Extra Credits and Demerits (range ‐28% to +33%) Legislators received extra credits and demerits based on one or more of the following criteria: Sponsorship: Prime sponsor, co‐prime sponsor, or cosponsor of a significant bill. Votes: Key committee votes on a significant environmental bill. Leadership: Publicly speaking out, speaking up in caucus, lobbying colleagues, committee work and

other actions, moving (or holding) a bill, secured amendments, and whether they “bucked” or “succumbed” to their own party.

Additional: accessibility, transparency, open/honest communication, and sign‐on letters.

6


Pro‐Environmental Legislation=GREEN + = YES VOTE ‐ = NO/ABSTENTION

Anti‐Environmental Legislation=RED + = NO/ABSTENTION ‐ = YES VOTE + = NO/ABSTENTION

Description and Status of Scored Bills (as of July 17, 2013) The score card starts from the most current legislative session. 1) Bad Development (A3680/S2583 in the 2012‐13 Legislature): Will subsidize development in the Highlands and Pinelands and weakens efforts to strengthen green building codes. Passed Senate 27‐9, amended by the Assembly 68‐5 and sent back to the Senate all on June 27, 2013. Voting NO OR ABSTAINING is pro‐environment (+) 2) Commercial Logging of State Forests (S1085 in the 2012‐13 Legislature): Would permit commercial logging of state‐owned forests without proper enforcement. Passed the Assembly 44‐28 with 3 abstentions on June 24, 2013. Passed the Senate 36‐3 on June 25, 2013. Bill now on Governor Christie’s desk. Voting NO is pro‐environment (+) 3) Pesticide Free Playing Fields (A2412/S1143 in the 2012‐13 Legislature): Restricts the use of the most toxic lawn pesticides where kids play (day‐cares, playgrounds, and K‐8 school fields). Since 2011, a majority of both houses have co‐sponsored the bill. However, in the last session there were two chances to post the bill, but leadership failed to do so. Introduced in the Senate Jan. 23, 2012 and in the Assembly Feb. 26, 2012. SPONSORING is pro‐environment (+) 4) Repeal Climate Change Bill (S276 in the 2012‐13 Legislature): Repeals the Global Warming Response Act, a law designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality and create green jobs in New Jersey. Introduced in Senate and Assembly on Jan 10, 2012. NOT SPONSORING is pro‐environment (+) 5) Permit Extension III (A1338 in the 2012‐13 Legislature): This bill would lengthen the expiration date on developers’ permits for an additional two years. This would be the third time the permits have been extended, so projects set to expire in 2007 would not need to be updated until 2014. The bill includes a “Dracula Clause” that would bring projects that have already expired back to life. Passed Assembly 66‐7 with 6 abstentions on June 25, 2012. Passed Senate 35‐1 on June 28, 2012. Governor Christie signed into law Sep. 19, 2012. Voting NO OR ABSTAINING is pro‐environment (+) 6) Frack Waste Ban (A575/S253 in the 2012‐13 Legislature): Bans the treatment, discharge, or storage of frack wastewater in New Jersey. Passed Senate 30‐5 on June 25, 2012 and Assembly 56‐19 with 4 abstentions on June 21, 2012. Vetoed by Governor Christie on Sep 24, 2012. Override vote pending. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+) 7) Solar Energy (S1925/A2966 in the 2012‐13 Legislature): Addresses the current oversupply of solar renewable energy credits (SRECs), with the intention to bring back stability to the New Jersey solar market, ensuring growth over the next several years. Passed Senate 35‐1 and Assembly 71‐4 with 4 abstentions on June 25, 2012. Signed into law by Governor Christie on July 23, 2012. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+) 8) Clean Air Program ‐ RGGI (A1998/S1322 in the 2012‐13 Legislature): Ensures New Jersey’s participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a successful clean air program among 10 northeast states to reduce carbon emissions and stimulate the economy that Governor Christie has withdrawn New Jersey from. Passed Senate 22‐16 and Assembly 45‐33 on May 24, 2012. Vetoed by Governor Christie on July 26, 2012. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+) 9) Dirty Water II (A4335/S3156 in the 2010‐11 Legislature): Delays updated water quality regulations for two years. This bill puts 300,000 acres of forests, wetlands and lands surrounding reservoirs, rivers and streams at risk for development. Passed the Senate 29‐7 and Assembly 54‐15 with 4 abstentions on Jan 9, 2012. Signed into law by Governor Christie on January 13, 2011. Voting NO OR ABSTAINING is pro‐environment (+) 10) Fracking Ban (S2576 in the 2010‐11 Legislature): Bans the process of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in New Jersey. Passed Senate 33‐1 and Assembly 58‐11 with 8 abstentions on June 29, 2011. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+) Note: This bill was subsequently conditionally vetoed on August 26, 2011 by Governor Christie who suggested amendments to convert the permanent ban into a one year moratorium. The Legislature accepted the Governor’s changes, which we opposed, and the bill became law on January 17, 2012. 7


11) Barnegat Bay Polluters Pay (S1856 in the 2010‐11 Legislature): Allows Ocean County and towns to charge a fee to developers to address storm water issues and to provide an incentive to reduce pollution from new developments that threaten Barnegat Bay. Passed Senate 21‐15 and Assembly 44‐33 with 1 abstention on Mar 21, 2011. Vetoed by Governor Christie on May 12, 2011. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+) 12) Barnegat Bay Clean‐Up (S2341/A3415 in the 2010‐11 Legislature): Requires NJDEP to adopt total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for Barnegat Bay ecosystem. Passed Senate 38‐0 on Dec 20, 2010 and Assembly 75‐0 on Dec 13, 2010. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+) Note: The bill was conditionally vetoed by Governor Christie on Feb 3, 2011. The Legislature disagreed with the changes, which we reluctantly supported, and the bill did not become law. 13) Fertilizer Reduction (A2290 in the 2010‐11 Legislature): Establishes statewide fertilizer standards for when and where lawn fertilizer can be applied, the amount of nitrogen that can be used for each application and for the year, and fertilizer content. Will help to protect water from the misuse of fertilizer. Passed Senate 36‐3 and Assembly 66‐7 with 1 abstention on Dec 13, 2010. Signed into law on January 5, 2011. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+) 14) Offshore Wind (S2036 in the 2010‐11 Legislature): Promotes the development of offshore wind energy projects. Passed the Senate 28‐10 and the Assembly 71‐6 with 1 abstention on June 28, 2010. Signed into law August 19, 2010. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+) 15) Sprawl and Pollution Bill (Time of Decision) (S82 in the 2010‐11 Legislature): "Grandfathers" in previously approved building projects so they do not have to meet updated land use standards. It will severely hinder the ability of citizens and local governments to do sound land use planning and protect natural resources, thus leading to more sprawl, pollution, and higher property taxes. Passed Senate 26 ‐ 8 on Mar 11, 2010 and Assembly 51 ‐ 14 with 11 abstentions on Mar 15, 2010. Signed into law on May 5, 2010. Voting NO OR ABSTAINING is pro‐environment (+). 16) Dirty Water I (A4345 in the 2008‐09 Legislature): Delays and weakens new protections for New Jersey’s water supply and 275,000 acres of environmentally sensitive land. Passed the Senate 30‐1 and Assembly 60‐13 with 4 abstentions on Jan 11, 2010. Pocket veto by Governor Corzine Jan 18, 2010. Voting NO OR ABSTAINING is pro‐environment (+) Note: A “pocket veto” means that a governor chooses not to act (i.e. sign or veto actively) a bill in the final days of a 2 year legislative session. As a result, the bill does not become law or go into effect, a passive veto. The legislative process would have to start all over again in the next session with a newly elected legislature. 17) Permit Extension II (A4347 in the 2008‐09 Legislature): Extends the Permit Extension Act of 2008 an additional two and half years. This means that expired permits would not have to meet any new, stronger environmental health standards enacted after 2007, which could undermine good planning and protection of our most environmentally sensitive areas. Passed Senate 32‐4 and Assembly 59‐14 with 3 abstentions on Jan 11, 2010. Signed into law on January 18, 2010. Voting NO OR ABSTAINING is pro‐environment (+) 18) Waiver Rule Veto (ACR37 in the 2012‐2013 Legislature) Will veto the waiver rule, which gives the NJDEP very broad authority to grant waivers and exempt companies from over 100 environmental regulations and weaken protections for our air, land and water. The Assembly passed 47‐32, but the bill is currently on hold in the Senate. Voting YES is pro‐environment (+).

8


NJ Environmental Federation Legislative Scorecard Senate 2010‐2013

NAMEParty & District

FINAL SCORE % 1.

Bad Development

(A3680/S2583)

2.Commercia

l Logging of State

Forests (S1085)

3. Pesticide Free Playing Fields

(A2412)

4. Repeal Clim

ate Change Bill

(A1500)

5. Permit Extension III (A

1338)

6. Fracking W

aste (A

575)

7. Solar Energy (S1925)

8. Clean Air Program ‐ RG

GI

(S1322)

9. Dirty W

ater II (S3156)

10. Fracking Ban (S2576)

11. Barn Bay P

olluters Pay

(S1856)

12. B

arnegat B

ay Clean‐Up

(A3415)

13. Fertilize

r Reductio

n (A2290)

14. O

ffshore W

ind (S2036)

15. Spraw

l & Pollutio

n Bill (S82)

16. D

irty W

ater I (A4345)

17. Permit Extension II (A4347)

18. W

aiver R

ule Veto (A

CR37)

Curre

ntly on hold in Se

nate

Extra

Credit

Demerit

Addiego* R 8 18 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐2Allen R 7 61 + ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + ‐ + + + nv nv nv 6Bateman R 16 82 ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ + + + + ‐ ‐ 24 ‐2Beach D 6 50 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐2Beck R 11 63 ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + + + + ‐ + ‐ ‐ 23Bucco R 25 17 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐8Buono D 18 94 + ‐ + + ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + ‐ 24Cardinale R 39 21 + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ nv + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Codey D 27 65 + ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 10Connors R 9 39 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + + ‐ ‐ 4Cunningham D 31 59 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + + ‐ ‐ 4Doherty R 23 10 + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐10Gill D 34 77 ‐ ‐ + + + + + + ‐ + + + + + + + + 7Gordon D 38 83 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + ‐ + + + + + + ‐ + + ‐ 28Greenstein* D 14 93 ‐ ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 18Holzapfel* R 10 59 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + ‐ nv + ‐ + + + ‐ + + 6Kean Jr R 21 63 + ‐ + + ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 18Kyrillos R 13 13 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 ‐6Lesniak D 20 46 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐6Madden D 4 48 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐2

For an explanation of bills and methodology please refer to our website: www.cleanwateraction.org/NJScorecard

NJ Environmental Federation Legislative Scorecard Senate 2010‐2013


FINAL SCORE % 1.

Bad Development

(A3680/S2583)

2.Commercia

l Logging of State

Forests (S1085)


(A2412)

4. Repeal Clim

ate Change Bill

(A1500)


1338)

6. Fracking W

aste (A

575)



GI

(S1322)

9. Dirty W

ater II (S3156)


11. Barn Bay P

olluters Pay

(S1856)

12. B

arnegat B

ay Clean‐Up

(A3415)

13. Fertilize

r Reductio

n (A2290)

14. O

ffshore W

ind (S2036)

15. Spraw

l & Pollutio

n Bill (S82)

16. D

irty W

ater I (A4345)


18. W

aiver R

ule Veto (A

CR37)

Curre

ntly on hold in Se

nate

Extra

Credit

Demerit

Norcross D 5 26 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + ‐ na na ‐8Oroho R 24 0 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐17O'Toole R 40 40 + ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + nv ‐ + ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3Pennacchio R 26 18 ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐4Pou* D 35 53 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + nv + ‐ ‐ 2 ‐2Rice D 28 49 nv ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ 2 ‐6Ruiz D 29 50 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + + ‐ ‐ 2 ‐2Sacco D 32 49 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 4Sarlo D 36 0 ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐27Scutari D 22 52 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 2Singer R 30 32 ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2Smith D 17 101 + ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 33 ‐12Stack D 33 48 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + ‐ 4 ‐6Sweeney D 3 33 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 16 ‐28Thompson* R 12 25 + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Turner D 15 76 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + 8 ‐2Van Drew D 1 22 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐10Vitale D 19 76 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 6Weinberg D 37 97 + ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 17Whelan D 2 58 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 ‐2

For an explanation of bills and methodology please refer to our website: www.cleanwateraction.org/NJScorecard

NJ Environmental Federation Legislative Scorecard Assembly 2010‐2013


FINAL SCORE % 1.

Bad Development

(A3680/S2583)

2.Commercia

l Logging of State

Forests (S1085)


(A2412)

4. Repeal Clim

ate Change Bill

(A1500)


1338)

6. Fracking W

aste (A

575)



GI

(S1322)

9. Dirty W

ater II (S3156)


11. Barn Bay P

olluters Pay (S1856)

12. B

arnegat B

ay Clean‐Up

(A3415)

13. Fertilize

r Reductio

n (A2290)

14. O

ffshore W

ind (S2036)

15. Spraw

l & Pollutio

n Bill (S82)

16. D

irty W

ater I (A4345)


18. W

aiver R

ule Veto (A

CR37)

Curre

ntly on hold in Se

nate

Extra

Credit

Demerit

Albano D 1 30 ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐8Amodeo R 2 30 ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 4 ‐2Andrzejczak D 1 21 ‐ ‐ ‐ + na na na na na na na na na na na na na naAngelini R 11 28 ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Barnes D 18 97 ‐ ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + ‐ + + + 28 ‐2Benson D 14 88 ‐ + + + + + + + + + + na na na na na na + 10Bramnick R 21 27 ‐ + ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐8Brown, CA R2 19 ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ na na na na na na na na na ‐Brown, CJ R8 26 ‐ + ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ na na na na na na na na na ‐ ‐2Bucco R 25 30 + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ nv + + + + na na ‐ ‐4Burzichelli D 3 30 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 ‐12Caputo D 28 61 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + + ‐ ‐ + 6 ‐2Caride D 36 60 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + na na na na na na na na na + 3Carroll R 25 12 nv + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐2Cassagrande R 11 38 ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Chivukula D 17 71 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + + + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 20 ‐6Ciattarelli R 16 34 ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ na na na na na na na na ‐Clifton R 12 40 ‐ + ‐ + ‐ + + ‐ na na na na na na na na na ‐ 2Conaway Jr D 7 72 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + + + + + + + + ‐ + + 10 ‐4Connors D 33 57 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + na na na na na na na na na +Coughlin D 19 54 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + + na na + ‐4Coutinho D 29 43 ‐ nv + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ + ‐ + ‐14Cryan D 20 63 ‐ ‐ ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 6Dancer R 12 35 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2DeAngelo D 14 45 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ + 4 ‐2Decroce R 26 13 ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ na na na na na na na na na ‐ ‐6Diegnan D 18 65 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + + + nv + + + + ‐ ‐ + 12 ‐4For an explanation of bills and methodology please refer to our website: www.cleanwateraction.org/NJScorecard



FINAL SCORE % 1.

Bad Development

(A3680/S2583)

2.Commercia

l Logging of State

Forests (S1085)


(A2412)

4. Repeal Clim

ate Change Bill

(A1500)


1338)

6. Fracking W

aste (A

575)



GI

(S1322)

9. Dirty W

ater II (S3156)


11. Barn Bay P


12. B

arnegat B

ay Clean‐Up

(A3415)

13. Fertilize

r Reductio

n (A2290)

14. O

ffshore W

ind (S2036)

15. Spraw

l & Pollutio

n Bill (S82)

16. D

irty W

ater I (A4345)


18. W

aiver R

ule Veto (A

CR37)

Curre

ntly on hold in Se

nate

Extra

Credit

Demerit

Dimaio R 23 19 + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐Egan D 17 49 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 2Eustace D 38 69 ‐ ‐ + + + + + + na na na na na na na na na + 5 ‐2Fuentes D 5 54 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ na na + ‐4Giblin D 34 72 ‐ + + + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ + + + + ‐ ‐ + + 17 ‐2Gove R 9 49 ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + + + + ‐ 2Green D 22 34 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 2 ‐20Greenwald D 6 29 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 2 ‐20Gusciora D 15 101 ‐ ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 27 ‐2Handlin R 13 39 ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐4Jasey D 27 92 nv ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ‐ + + 22 ‐1Jimenez D 32 58 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + na na na na na na na na na + 1Johnson D 37 64 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + + + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 12 ‐5Kean* R 30 40 + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2Lampitt D 6 43 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 2 ‐6Mainor D 31 60 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ na na + 2McGuckin R 10 42 ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ na na na na na na na na na ‐ 4McHose R 24 3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐11McKeon D 27 102 + ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 30 ‐8Moriarty D 4 38 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + + + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐14Mosquera D 4 43 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + na na na na na na na na na + ‐4Munoz R 21 31 ‐ + ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐4O'Donnell D 31 67 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + na na na na + 6Oliver D 34 41 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 6 ‐12O'Scanlon Jr R 13 35 + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + + nv ‐ ‐ ‐Peterson R 23 24 + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + ‐Prieto D 32 52 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 2 ‐2For an explanation of bills and methodology please refer to our website: www.cleanwateraction.org/NJScorecard



FINAL SCORE % 1.

Bad Development

(A3680/S2583)

2.Commercia

l Logging of State

Forests (S1085)


(A2412)

4. Repeal Clim

ate Change Bill

(A1500)


1338)

6. Fracking W

aste (A

575)



GI

(S1322)

9. Dirty W

ater II (S3156)


11. Barn Bay P


12. B

arnegat B

ay Clean‐Up

(A3415)

13. Fertilize

r Reductio

n (A2290)

14. O

ffshore W

ind (S2036)

15. Spraw

l & Pollutio

n Bill (S82)

16. D

irty W

ater I (A4345)


18. W

aiver R

ule Veto (A

CR37)

Curre

ntly on hold in Se

nate

Extra

Credit

Demerit

Quijano D 20 50 ‐ ‐ ‐ + + + + + ‐ + + nv nv + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 4 ‐2Ramos D 33 60 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 12 ‐4Rible R 30 15 ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐4Riley D 3 48 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + + + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐4Rudder R 8 28 ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 ‐2Rumana R 40 45 ‐ + + ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + + + + + + ‐ ‐2Rumpf R 9 60 + + ‐ ‐ nv + nv ‐ + + ‐ + + + + + + ‐ 2Russo R 40 43 ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + + + + + ‐Schaer D 36 62 ‐ + ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + nv nv + + + ‐ + 4Schepisi R 39 49 ‐ + + + ‐ + + ‐ na na na na na na na na na ‐ 2Schroeder R 39 43 ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + + na na ‐Simon R 16 25 ‐ + ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ na na na na na na na na na ‐ ‐3Singleton D 7 49 ‐ + ‐ + ‐ + + nv + na na na na na na na na nv 2 ‐6Space R 24 0 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ na na na na na na na na na na na na na na ‐2Spencer D 29 62 ‐ ‐ ‐ + + + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 18 ‐8Stender D 22 70 ‐ ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 9Sumter D 35 46 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + na na na na na na na na na + 1 ‐2Tucker D 28 58 nv nv + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ +Vainieri Huttle D 37 98 ‐ ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 22Wagner D 38 94 ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + ‐ + 25 ‐2Watson Coleman D 15 74 ‐ ‐ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 ‐4Webber R 26 19 + + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Wilson D 5 56 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ na na + ‐2Wimberly D 35 51 nv ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + na na na na na na na na na + 2 ‐4Wisniewski D 19 51 ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + ‐ + + + + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + 6 ‐2Wolfe R 10 46 ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ + ‐ ‐ + ‐ + + + nv ‐ + ‐ 6For an explanation of bills and methodology please refer to our website: www.cleanwateraction.org/NJScorecard

Scorecard Report 8-5-2013 FINALLegislative Scorecard Formatted Senate FINAL 7-17Legislative Scorecard Formatted Assembly Final 7-17

Documents

NJ ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION LEGISLATIVE SCORE CARD · 2019. 12. 16. · NJ Environmental Federation’s New Jersey Legislative Scorecard 2010‐13 The New Jersey Environmental Federation’s