Ngsdh Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    1/242

    1

    NG SDH/ASONDeveloped & Delivered By:

    Dr Muhammad Khalil Shahid

    Associate Professor, ICT, PTCL, Islamabad

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    2/242

    2

    COURSE OBJECTIVESTo provide participants with clear understanding and practical knowledge of

    next generation SDH and ASONAt the end of this course participants will be able to:

    Understand Essentials of transmission

    Understand the major components of NGSDH

    Understand the Equipment and Line protection of NGSDH

    Outline the Limitations of NGSDH

    Outline the classification of Ethernet Services

    Configure different services through NMS (Huawei iManagerT2000)

    Outline the structure of ASON

    Understand different service types in ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    3/242

    3

    COURSE OUTLINE Introduction & Overview

    NGSDH Components and Protection

    NGSDH Features

    Hardware (OSN 3500)

    Ethernet Services & Configuration

    ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    4/242

    4

    Introduction & Overview

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    5/242

    5

    Transport Network A Transmission Network which has abilities of

    Manageability, Scalability, have QoS and Fast

    Protection is called TransportNetwork

    Earlier systems up to PDH were considered asTransmission system. SDH introduces the new

    term TransportNetwork

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    6/242

    6

    Transmission FundamentalsSome basic concepts in Transmission are:

    Modulation

    Demodulation

    Line coding Multiplexing

    De-multiplexing

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    7/2427

    Optical Communication System

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    8/2428

    Telecommunication BandsOptical telecommunication in the near & short infrared is technically often separated Or

    O-band 1,2601,360 nm ---------- Original

    E-band 1,3601,460 nm ---------- Extended

    S-band 1,460

    1,530 nm------------- Short wavelengthC-band 1,5301,565 nm----------- Conventional

    L-band 1,5651,625 nm------------ Long Wavelength

    U-band 1,625

    1,675 nm-----------Ultra long wave length

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    9/2429

    Optical Windows

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    10/24210

    10

    Attenuation

    Dispersion

    Limiting Factors

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    11/242

    1111

    Attenuation Due to impurities in glass

    In fabrication

    Bad connectors

    Insertion losses

    pulse can be weaker

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    12/242

    OnOff

    On

    1 0 1

    On Off On On Off On

    1 0 1

    On On On

    1 1 1

    Off Off Off

    0 0 0

    ReceiverThreshold

    ExcessiveDispersion

    BitError

    Excessivedispersion &(attenuation)

    Bit

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    13/242

    1313

    SM Optical Fiber DispersionCharacteristics

    Dispersion coefficient(ps/nm Km)

    G.655 fiber with positivedispersion coefficient

    G.653 fiber

    (nm)15501310

    G.652 fiber17

    G.655 fiber with negativedispersion coefficient

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    14/242

    14

    Evolution Of Transport Technologies PCM

    PDH

    SDH

    NGSDH/Ethernet/RPR WDM/ROADM/OTN

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    15/242

    15

    SDH Synchronous Digital Hierarchy

    SDH is a hierarchical set of digital transport

    structures, standardized for the transport of

    suitably adapted payloads over physicaltransmission networks

    An integrated transmission network managed by

    a powerful network management system

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    16/242

    16

    SDH

    A standard developed by the InternationalTelecommunication Union (ITU)

    It is documented in standard G.707 and its

    extension G.708

    Developed to replace the Plesiochronous

    Digital Hierarchy (PDH) system

    Allow interoperability between equipment

    from different vendors with Strong NetworkManagement capabilities

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    17/242

    17

    STM-1: 155.52 Mbps

    STM-4: 622.08 Mbps

    STM-16: 2.488.32 Gbps

    STM-64: 9.95 Gbps

    STM-256: 40 Gbps

    SDH Bit Rates

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    18/242

    18

    MUXMUXREG

    Path Section

    MS

    MSMSMultiplex Section

    Multiplex Section

    Multiplex Section

    RS

    SDH Link Structure

    Regenerator Section

    Sub network

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    19/242

    19

    RS, MS, AND Path OverheadsDifference among POH, MSOH, & RSOH

    Term

    Mux

    Term

    MuxAdd-Drop

    Mux

    Repeater Repeater

    POH

    MSOH

    RSOH

    Path OH end to end circuit

    Multiplex Section OH multiplexerto multiplexer

    Regenerator Section OH repeaterto adjacent node or vice versa

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    20/242

    20

    STM Performance Monitoring AndManagement RSOH, MSOH and POH provide monitoring and

    management function for different layers/levels

    of STM-N frame

    For STM-64 frame: RSOH monitors the overall transmission

    performance of STM-64 signal

    MSOH monitors the performance of individual

    STM-1s

    POH monitors each low-rate signal (e.g., 2

    Mbps)

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    21/242

    21

    Mapping & Multiplexing Procedures

    STM-NxN x1

    C-12VC-12VC-4 TUG-2AUG-4 AU-4 TU-12 2Mb/s

    Code rate

    adjustment

    LO POH

    TU PTR

    AU PTR

    x3

    Multiplexing

    x7 Multiplexing

    HO POHxN Multiplexing

    TUG-3

    x3

    Multiplexing

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    22/242

    22

    Communication Channel

    Data Communication Channel Bytes: D1~D12

    These 12 bytes are provided for the transport of monitoring

    & control data in Network Management System.

    D1-D3 belongs to RSOH, bandwidth is 3x64 kb/s

    D4-D12 belongs to MSOH, bandwidth is 9x64 kb/s

    D1-D12 are transmitted in STM-1#1 of STM-N only.

    OAM Massages: performance,alarm, operation commands etc.

    DCC Channel

    NMS

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    23/242

    23

    APSAutomatic Protection Switching (APS) bytes: K1, K2

    (bits:b1-b5)

    Used for network multiplex protection switch function

    K1 & K2 only transmitted in STM-1 #1 of STM-N

    Multiplex Section Remote Defect Indication (MS-RDI): K2(b6-b8)

    Return alarm message from Rx to Tx

    Indicate Rx receiving alarm

    K2 (b6-b8) value is 110

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    24/242

    24

    Detect

    K2 (b6~b8)

    111

    Generate MS-

    AIS

    Return MS-

    RDI

    Y

    N

    Normal

    Operation

    K1 & K2 Bytes

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    25/242

    25

    Clock Quality SSM indicates the status & quality level of SDH signal

    Value indicates quality level of available clock source (b5-b8)

    0010 = G.811 = External Clock (Cesium)

    0100 = G.812 = Transit Exchange Clock Signal (Rubidium)1000 = G.812 = Local Exchange Clock Signal (Rubidium orCrystal)

    1011 = G.813 = Internal Clock (SETS) (Crystal)

    1111= Not Suitable for synchronization

    Only transmitted in STM-1 #1 of STM-N

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    26/242

    26

    E1 Mapping In VC4TS# X+ 3 (Y-1)+ 21 (Z-1)

    X= TUG-3 Location (1-3)

    Y= TUG-2 Location (1-7)Z= TU-12 Location (1-3)

    If E1 location is TU 2 4 3, find TS#

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    27/242

    27

    Network elements are synchronized to a central clock. This central clock is

    generated by a high-precision primary reference clock (PRC) unit (ITU-TG.811). This specifies an accuracy of 1 x 10 e-11. This clock signal must be distributed throughout the entire network. Ahierarchical structure is used for this. Improper synchronization causes degradation in network function, and

    even total failure results

    SDH Synchronization Method

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    28/242

    28

    PRC

    SEC1

    20

    SSU1

    SSU10

    21

    60

    Cascading of timing references through a networkshould be minimized and governed by the ITUrecommendation.

    Timing performance degrades as timing is passed

    from clock to clock. Synchronization chains should bekept short

    Synchronization Network Chain

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    29/242

    29

    Normal Operating mode Holdover mode

    Free-run mode

    Normal

    ab

    b

    c

    d

    Holdover Free-run

    NE clock working mode

    Synchronous Timing Unit

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    30/242

    30

    Network Protection

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    31/242

    31

    Line Network Protection Types

    1+1 Multiplex Section Protection

    1:1 Multiplex Section Protection

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    32/242

    32

    Line Network 1+1 Multiplex Section ProtectionOL

    OL

    TR OL

    OL

    TR

    At sending end, the STM-N signal is sent simultaneouslyover both segments of the work and protect.At receiving side, only one (work or protect) path isselected based on quality.Send Together Receive One

    work route

    protect routeworkor protect

    CS CS

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    33/242

    33

    Line Network 1:1 Multiplex SectionProtection

    OL

    OL

    Work CSOL

    OL

    CS

    Protection

    Work

    The 1:1 structure is the subset of the 1:N (where N=1)structure.It has the capacity to work in the 1+1 structure and tointerconnect with the 1+1 structure of the other end.

    Protection

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    34/242

    34

    Continue

    In Multiplexing segment 1:1 protection Theworking payload is transmitted through the

    working path while the protection path can be

    used to carry extra payload which is of inferior

    class. When the working path fails, the extra payload on

    the protection path will be superseded by the

    working payload according to APS protocol. Thus

    the working payload is protected.

    Under normal circumstances, 1:1 becomes 2+0.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    35/242

    36

    Basic Ring Network Protection Types 2-fiber Unidirectional Path Protection Ring

    2-fiber Bidirectional Multiplex Section

    Protection Ring

    4-fiber Bidirectional Multiplex Section

    Protection Ring

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    36/242

    37

    2-fiber Unidirectional Path Protection Ring

    It adopts 1+1 protection mode, the switching criteria is PATH-AIS, & APSprotocol is not needed.

    At the source NE, the payload is send to the working path and protection pathsimultaneously. The destination NE detect and compare the coming signal fromboth paths, then determine to receive the payload of better quality.

    AC

    CA AC

    A

    B

    C

    D

    CA

    W1

    W1

    P1

    P1

    CA AC

    A

    BC

    D

    W1

    P1

    P1

    W1

    CA AC

    switching

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    37/242

    38

    2-fiber Bidirectional MS Protection Ring

    2 fiber: Two fibers between a pair of nodes

    Bi-direction: Service between two NEs use the

    same section of the network and are transmitted

    by reverse direction

    Multiplexing Section: Protection based on MS,

    protect the payload part, use APS protocol for

    protection.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    38/242

    39

    Working PrincipleS1/P2

    S2/P1A

    C

    BD

    Working pathS1 & S2; under normal

    situations, service aretransmitted overworking path. The firsthalf of one fiber isworking path. Taking

    STM-16 as an example,1-8 AU4 are used forworking path.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    39/242

    40

    Working Principle

    S1/P2

    S2/P1A

    C

    BD

    Protecting PathP1 & P2; servicestransmit alongprotection path afterswitch over. The lasthalf part of the fiber isused as protectingpath. Taking STM-16 asexample, 9-16 AU4 are

    used as protectingpath.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    40/242

    41

    Working PrincipleS1/P2

    S2/P1A

    C

    BD

    Relationship

    between working& protecting pathsThe protecting path ofone direction protect

    the working path ofthe other direction,i.e, P1 protects S1, &P2 protects S2.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    41/242

    42

    Working PrincipleUse S1 & S2 to transmitservices.

    Service AC is sent in S1through path A->B->C

    Service CA is sent in S2through path C->B->A

    P1 and P2 can be used to

    send extra service now.

    AC Tx

    S1/P2

    S2/P1A

    C

    BD

    AC RxCA Tx

    CA Rx

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    42/242

    43

    Switching ConditionsAuto Switch Conditions:

    LOS, LOF, MS-AIS, Signal Degrade

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    43/242

    44

    Switching ProcedureSwitchIf the fiber betweenB and C is broken, switchingoccurs in B and C

    B node: service AC crossesfrom S1 to P1, and sentthrough A->B->A->D->C

    C node: service CA crossesfrom S2 to P2, and sentthrough C->D->A->B->A

    AC Tx

    S1/P2

    S2/P1A

    C

    BD

    AC RxCA Tx

    CA Rx

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    44/242

    45

    Normal state in MS-SPRING. AU4 # 1-8 used for workingchannels AU4# 9-16 used for protection& can be used for low prioritytraffic.

    Time slots can be reused

    High network

    capacity *M*STM-N

    Switching time -

    25ms

    Multiplex Section Shared Protection Ring

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    45/242

    46

    Features Of 2 Fiber Bidirectional MSP Ring Advantages:Time slots between two nodes can be

    reused, thus increasing the transmission capacity.

    Standby path P1 and P2 can be used to transmit

    extra services of inferior class.

    Disadvantages: longer switching time due to APS

    protocol. Numbers of maximum nodes supported

    by APS is limited to 16.

    Transmission capacity: (k/2) x STM-N (k=no. of

    nodes).

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    46/242

    47

    4 Fiber Bidirectional MSP Ring

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    47/242

    48

    4 Fiber Bidirectional MSP Ring

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    48/242

    49

    Advantages:

    Time slots can be reused

    High network capacity: M*STM-N

    Disadvantages:

    Maximum number of nodes on one ring is limited to 16

    Mechanism is complicated

    Expensive

    Application:

    Mainly STM-16 or above system Scattered traffic distribution

    Backbone system

    4 Fiber Bidirectional MSP Ring

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    49/242

    50

    Protection Type 2f Unidirectional PP

    Ring

    2f Bidirectional MSP Ring 4f Bidirectional MSP Ring

    No. of Nodes K K K

    Line Speed STM-N STM-N STM-N

    Transmission

    Capacity

    STM-N K/2*STM-N k*STM-N

    APS Protocol No Yes Yes

    Switching Time

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    50/242

    51

    Node Protection (SNCP)

    Protection features:

    Traffic transmit end sends concurrently, receiveend receives selectively

    2 fiber unidirectional traffic (Diversely routed)

    1 + 1 single-ended protectionProtection switching criteria:

    Signal fail (SF)

    Signal degrade (SD) Externally initiated command

    SNCP

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    51/242

    52

    SNCP

    SNCP V MSSPRING

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    52/242

    53

    SNCP Vs MSSPRING

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    53/242

    54

    Network Protection Summary

    SDH SONET

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    54/242

    55

    SDH vs. SONET SONET can be thought of as the North

    American version of SDH

    The main differences are in the basic SDH andSONET frame formats, but SDH and SONET areessentially identical beyond the STS-3 signallevel

    The base signal for SONET is STS-1 and thebase signal for SDH is STM-1.

    STS-3c is equivalent to STM-1 and the lowertributaries can be mapped interchangeablybetween the two formats from that point on.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    55/242

    56

    Continue

    In SDH, both electrical and optical signals arereferred to as STM signals.

    In SONET, however, electrical signals are called

    STS and optical signals are referred to as OC.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    56/242

    57

    SDH / SONET ADVANTAGES:

    Strong Management capabilities

    Provide guaranteed bandwidth

    Provide fast recovery time from faults smaller than 50ms

    DISADVANTAGES:

    No support for Data services

    Fixed circuits ( circuit-based)

    Bandwidth inefficiency

    Only one node can transmit at a time

    57

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    57/242

    58

    NGSDH Features

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    58/242

    59

    SDH Problems The traffic type is changing Challenge How to use bandwidth efficiently for

    both voice and data traffic

    Lack of fine granularity to accommodate allpotential clients stream rates

    WHY NGSDH

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    59/242

    60

    WHY NGSDH

    Data traffic is growing exponentially

    Accommodating this traffic is must

    Data traffic handling is limitation of SDH

    Need for new system which can support data

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    60/242

    61

    WHY NGSDH The data packet transport (Ethernet, PPP) is a

    challenge for SDH

    This is because they are connectionless, use

    statistical multiplexing, and can be best-effort

    technologies This is the opposite of SDH which is predictable

    and based on time division multiplexing (TDM)

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    61/242

    62

    Continue.

    Two options

    Some modification to existing SDH

    Metro Ethernet

    First option will save investment already made in

    SDH

    No need for major modification

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    62/242

    63

    NGSDH- Ethernet Over SDH

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    63/242

    64

    Ethernet Over SDH

    SDH

    SDH

    SDH

    SDH

    SDH

    SDH

    SDH

    SDH

    METRO NETWORK

    SDH

    Ring-1

    SDH

    Ring-2

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    64/242

    65

    NG SDH Drivers The drive to SDH Next Generation development

    was:The desire to find one simple encapsulation

    method that was capable of accommodating

    any data packet protocols

    Secondly, the need to use bandwidth

    accurately

    Solution A new adaptation protocol layer is

    required and a new mapping mechanism forcontrolling bandwidth use

    What is NGSDH

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    65/242

    66

    What is NGSDH Next-generation SDH is the evolution and

    enhancement of existing SDH networks

    It improves network efficiency and broadband

    service potential

    SDH Next Generation enables transporting data

    efficiently, without needing to replace theinstalled equipment base

    The only change needed to update the network

    is to replace the edge nodes

    The network is then ready to transport Ethernet

    What is NGSDH

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    66/242

    67

    What is NGSDH

    SDH with Data handling capability Simply addition of 3 functions to accommodate

    Data traffic (to encapsulate Ethernet frame)

    Generic Framing Protocol (GFP) Virtual Concatenation (VCAT)

    Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS)

    Continue.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    67/242

    68

    These functions are implemented on the new

    MSSP nodes which are located at the edges ofthe network

    They interact with the client data packets that

    are aggregated over the SDH/SONET backplanethat continues unchanged

    This means that the MSSPs represent the SDH

    Next Generation embedded in the legacy SDH

    network

    Next Generation SDH

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    68/242

    69

    The architectures are increasingly demanding

    long haul transport that today can only beprovided by SDH/DWDM having a massive

    installed base, developed over recent decades

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    69/242

    70

    NG SDH Network

    GFP

    VCAT

    LCAS

    SDH

    GFP

    VCAT

    LCAS

    SDHSDH SDH

    Client SDH NGExisting SDH SDH NG Client

    Mapping in Frames

    Virtual containersTransport

    Bandwidth management

    NG SDH

    PDH

    Ethernet

    VPN

    PDH

    Ethernet

    VPN

    Paths,

    Section

    Paths,

    Section

    MSSP*MSSP

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    70/242

    71

    NG-SDH Features NG SDH enables operators to provide more data

    transport services while increasing the efficiencyof installed SDH base

    The technology is implemented in the edgenodes only, no need to install an overlap networkor migrating all the nodes

    This reduces the cost per bit delivered, and willattract new customers while keeping legacyservices

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    71/242

    72

    NG SDH Nodes Multiservice Provisioning Platform (MSPP)

    Includes SDH multiplexing, sometimes with add-drop,

    plus Ethernet ports, sometimes packet multiplexing

    and switching, sometimes WDM

    Multiservice Switching Platform (MSSP)MSPP with a large capacity for TDM switching

    Optical Edge Device (OED)

    An MSSP with no WDM functions

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    72/242

    73

    NG SDH Nodes Multiservice Transport Node (MSTN)

    An MSPP with feature-rich packet switching

    Multiservice Access Node (MSAN)

    An MSPP designed for customer access, largely via

    copper pairs carrying Digital-Subscriber Line (DSL)

    services

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    73/242

    74

    GENERIC FRAMING PROTOCOL Defined in ITU-T G.7041

    Its a mechanism for mapping constant and

    variable bit rate data over a transport network

    like synchronous SDH frames

    GFP support many types of protocols

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    74/242

    75

    GENERIC FRAMING PROTOCOL In any case GFP adds a very low overhead to

    increase the efficiency of the optical layer

    The client signals can be protocol data unit

    (PDU) oriented (like IP/PPP or Ethernet Media

    Access Control) or can be block-code oriented

    GFP Frame

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    75/242

    76

    GFP Frame

    GFP-F Modes

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    76/242

    77

    Currently, two modes of client signal adaptation are

    defined for GFP: Frame-Mapped GFP (GFP-F) Its a layer 2 encapsulation PDU-oriented adaptation mode

    GFP-F entirely maps one complete client frame into a single GFPframe

    Idle packets are not transmitted resulting in more efficient

    transport GFP-F is used where the client signal is framed or packetized by

    the client protocol e.g., Ethernet, PPP/IP and HDLC-like protocols

    To perform the encapsulation process it is necessary to receivethe complete client packet, but this procedure increases thelatency

    Specific mechanisms are required to transport each type ofprotocol

    GFP-T

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    77/242

    78

    Transparent GFP (GFP-T) Its a layer 1 encapsulation or block-code oriented adaptation

    mode

    Transparent GFP (GFP-T) is a protocol-independentencapsulation method in which all client code words are decodedand mapped into GFP frames

    The frames are transmitted immediately without waiting for theentire client data packet to be received

    It is used to adapt block-oriented client data (Gigabit Ethernet,Fiber Channel and Digital Video Broadcast (DVB))

    GFP-T can adapt multiple protocols as long as they are based on

    8B/10B line coding This line codes are transcoded to 64B/65B and then

    encapsulated into fixed size GFP-T frames

    GFP-F and GFP-T Comparison

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    78/242

    79

    Byte GFP-F GFP-T

    Protocol Transparency Low High

    Efficiency High Low

    Delay-sensitive protocols No Yes

    Encapsulation Protocol Level Layer 2 Layer 1Optimized for Ethernet SAN, DVB

    Statistical multiplexing of

    several client signals

    Yes No

    SAN transport No Yes

    Ethernet transport Optimum Possible

    Concatenation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    79/242

    80

    Concatenation is the process of summing the bandwidth

    ofX containers into a larger container It is well indicated for the transport of big payloads

    requiring a container greater than VC-4

    But it is also possible to concatenate low-capacity

    containers, such as VC-11 or VC-12 There are two concatenation methods

    Contiguous concatenation

    Virtual concatenation

    Contiguous Concatenation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    80/242

    81

    It creates big containers that cannot split into

    smaller pieces during transmission

    For this, each NE must have a concatenation

    functionality

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    81/242

    82

    Contiguous

    Concatenation

    Virtual concatenation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    82/242

    83

    It transports the individual VCs and aggregates

    them at the end point of the transmission path

    For this, concatenation functionality is only

    needed at the path termination equipment

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    83/242

    84

    Virtual

    Concatenation

    Virtual Concatenation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    84/242

    85

    VCAT

    No Concatenation

    2.5 Gbps OC-

    48/STM-16packed at nearly88% efficiency

    Gig Ethernet(1.0/1.2 Gbps)

    STS-3c-7v/VC-4-7v(1050 Mbps)

    Data

    ESCON(160/200 Mbps)

    STS-1-4v/VC-3-4v

    (196 Mbps)SAN

    STS-3/STM-1(150 Mbps)

    TDMOC-3/STM-1(155 Mbps)

    2.5 Gbps OC-48/STM-16 low

    efficiency

    Gig Ethernet(1.0/1.2 Gbps)

    1050 Mbps

    Data

    150 Mbps

    TDMOC-3/STM-1

    (155 Mbps)

    155 Mbps STM-1high efficiency

    ESCON(160/200 Mbps)

    196 Mbps

    SAN

    622 Mbps OC -23/STM-4 low

    efficiency

    VCAT Efficiency

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    85/242

    86

    VCAT Efficiency

    Contiguous and Virtual Concatenation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    86/242

    87

    Comparison Contiguous concatenation is less bandwidth-

    efficient than virtual concatenation

    Virtual concatenation (VCAT) is a solution that

    allows granular increments of bandwidth in single

    VC-n units

    Contiguous and Virtual Concatenation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    87/242

    88

    ComparisonService Bit Rate Contiguous

    Concatenation

    Virtual

    Concatenation

    Ethernet 10 Mbps VC-3 (20%) VC-11-7v (89%)

    Fast Ethernet 100 Mbps VC-4 (67%) VC-3-2v (99%)

    Gigabit Ethernet 1000 Mbps VC-4-16c(42%) VC-4-7v (95%)

    Fiber Channel 1700 Mbps VC-4-16c(42%) VC-4-12v (90%)

    Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    88/242

    89

    It is standardized by the ITU-T as G.7042

    LCAS is a signaling protocol for sizing virtually

    concatenated paths

    With LCAS, VCG can be resized at any time

    without disturbing network traffic LCAS can add and remove members of a VCG

    to match the variable bit rate patterns and the

    burst nature of most data networks

    Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    89/242

    90

    LCAS signaling messages are exchanged to

    change the number of VC between the source

    and the destination of the path

    The number of VC can be increased or

    decreased without any frames lost thereforeincreasing or decreasing the capacity of the VCG

    link

    Transmission Of Frames

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    90/242

    91

    Protection Through LCAS

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    91/242

    92

    Protection Through LCAS

    NGSDH Limitations

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    92/242

    93

    Engineered for voice not for data

    Static bandwidth allocation Inefficient bandwidth utilization

    Complicated service provisioning. Creating an

    end-to-end circuit takes many steps

    Ethernet rates do not match SDH rates

    High cost of bandwidth change

    Practical Considerations

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    93/242

    94

    C

    Inclusion of one Card (ETF Board in Huawei

    Optix 2500+) in traditional SDH Sub-rack Up-gradation of Software at NMS (if Ethernet

    Functinality not included in T2000)

    Pure NGSDH Systems (like Huawei OSN series)

    some differences include:

    No need to delete Traffic for deleting Protection

    Optical Interfaces are plug-able, no need to

    replace full card Support ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    94/242

    95

    Hardware (OSN 3500)

    OSN3500

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    95/242

    96

    Huawei NGSDH series

    OSN stands for Optical Switch Node

    Intelligent (support ASON)

    OSN 3500 Intelligent Features

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    96/242

    97

    g

    Service level agreement (SLA)

    Topology automatic discovery function

    Automatic end-to-end service configuration

    Support mesh networking and protection

    Traffic engineering

    Supports RPR

    Sub rack with Boards (OSN3500)

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    97/242

    98

    Cabinet Indicators

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    98/242

    99

    Subrack

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    99/242

    100

    Slot Access Capacity

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    100/242

    101

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    101/242

    102

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    102/242

    103

    System Architecture

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    103/242

    104

    Board Appearance and Dimensions

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    104/242

    105

    Functions of SL64

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    105/242

    106

    Optical Port Parameters

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    106/242

    107

    SDH Boards

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    107/242

    108

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    108/242

    109

    Slots for SL64 & SF64

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    109/242

    110

    Functional Block Diagram SL64

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    110/242

    111

    Indicators

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    111/242

    112

    Indicators

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    112/242

    113

    Board Hardware_ STAT Indicator

    Service Activation_ ACT Indicator

    PDH Boards with Slot Allocation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    113/242

    114

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    114/242

    115

    PDH Board Function

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    115/242

    116

    Alarms

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    116/242

    117

    Ethernet Boards

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    117/242

    118

    Ethernet Boards Slots

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    118/242

    119

    Functions

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    119/242

    120

    Features of EFS4

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    120/242

    121

    Supports bandwidth auto-sensing

    Supports MPLS

    Supports LCAS

    Supports Port based flow control

    Supports receiving and transmitting Ethernet testing

    frame

    Supports inloop at Ethernet port and inloop and outloop

    at VC3 level

    Supports port level Ethernet performance monitoring

    Supports EPL/EPLAN/EVPL/EVPLAN services and QoS

    Indicators

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    121/242

    122

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    122/242

    123

    Ethernet Board Indicators

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    123/242

    124

    Ethernet Unit Alarms

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    124/242

    125

    Cross Connect & SCC Boards

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    125/242

    126

    Capacity of Cross Connect Boards

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    126/242

    127

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    127/242

    Alarms

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    128/242

    129

    GSCC

    S t NE ID tti b ft

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    129/242

    130

    Support NE ID setting by software

    Supports 1+1 hot backup Supports 40 DCC

    Processes Order-wire bytes

    Controls cabinet indicators and intelligent fans

    Collects and monitors alarms and performance

    events

    Monitors power supply

    Supports ASON intelligent function

    Inserted in slot 18 (Active) and/or Slot 17 (Standby

    SCC Unit Functions

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    130/242

    131

    SCC Databases

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    131/242

    132

    Alarms

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    132/242

    133

    AMP & Dispersion Compensation Boards

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    133/242

    134

    DCU

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    134/242

    135

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    135/242

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    136/242

    137

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    137/242

    138

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    138/242

    139

    Equipment Protection

    TPS Protection

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    139/242

    140

    Working Protection Relationship

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    140/242

    141

    Ethernet Board Protection

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    141/242

    142

    Equipment Protection Slots

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    142/242

    143

    Equipment Protection Summary

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    143/242

    144

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    144/242

    145

    ETHERNET SERVICES OVER NGSDH

    EthernetIEEE 802 3

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    145/242

    146

    IEEE 802.3

    Ethernet is the most widespread layer 2frame based computer networking technology

    forLANs

    Ethernet transport services can run over

    almost any infrastructure like SDH,WDM,wireless and even copper facilities

    Ethernet And Transport Rate Convergence

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    146/242

    147

    Basic Concepts

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    147/242

    148

    PortExternal physical port of Ethernet unit, the

    common rates of external port are 10M, FE, GE

    and 10GE;

    VC Trunk

    Virtual Container Trunk, VC Trunk is built by VC.

    It is the internal port of Ethernet unit.

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    148/242

    149

    Tag Attributes

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    149/242

    150

    Tag flag is used to identify the type of frames. Three types of Tag attributes are available:

    Tag aware

    Access

    Hybrid

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    150/242

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    151/242

    Ethernet Services

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    152/242

    153

    E-Line EPL

    EVPL

    ELAN

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    153/242

    Continue

    E Li S

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    154/242

    155

    E-Line Service used to create

    Ethernet Private LinesVirtual Private Lines

    Carrier EthernetNetwork

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    155/242

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    156/242

    157

    EVPLEthernet Virtual Private Line (EVPL)

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    157/242

    158

    Supports sharing of multiple VC Trunks and/or

    Ports

    Allows single physical connection/Port to

    accommodate different customer traffic

    Improve the bandwidth utilization ratio and save

    the ports resource of Ethernet Unit

    ISPPOP

    Port Shared EVPL

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    158/242

    159

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    159/242

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    160/242

    MPLS Basics

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    161/242

    162

    MPLS

    Multi protocol Label Switching standard routing

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    162/242

    163

    Multi-protocol Label Switching, standard routing

    and switching platform; Tunnel/VC: Two labels in MPLS, range of value

    is 16(220-1)

    LSP: Label switching path, different value labels

    will be given in different nodes, data can be sent

    forward according these labels

    P/PE: P (Provider) internal node of MPLS

    network, PE (Provider Edge) the edge of MPLSnetwork

    EVPL (MPLS)

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    163/242

    164

    Q in Q

    QinQ technology is a VLAN stacking technology

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    164/242

    165

    QinQ technology is a VLAN stacking technology

    C-VLAN S-VLAN

    Advantages of QinQ technology:

    Expands VLAN and alleviates VLAN resourceinsufficiency;

    Extends LAN service to WAN, connecting the

    client network to the carrier network and

    supporting transparent transmission

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    165/242

    Ethernet Service Types : E-LANE-LAN Service used to create

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    166/242

    167

    Multipoint to MultipointTransparent LAN Service

    Foundation for IPTV and Multicast networks

    etc.

    CarrierEthernetNetwork

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    167/242

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    168/242

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    169/242

    VB/LP

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    170/242

    171

    EVPLAN

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    171/242

    172

    Bandwidth sharing by different users

    Services are differentiated by different

    schemes

    IEEE 802.1q Bridge

    IEEE 802.1ad Bridge

    IEEE 802.1q Bridge

    Performs Layer 2 Switching According to Destination MAC

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    172/242

    173

    Performs Layer 2 Switching According to Destination MAC

    address and VLANIDs

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    173/242

    NG-SDH Summary ADVANTAGES:

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    174/242

    175

    Interfaces for multiple packet technologies (PPP, Ethernet, SAN)

    More Effectively bandwidth utilization through VC & LCAS

    Requires changes only at edge nodes

    DISADVANTAGES:

    Optimized for Voice, not for Data

    Complicated service provisioning. (Creating an end-to-end circuit takes many steps)

    Ether rates do not match SDH

    Bandwidth inefficiency

    175

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    175/242

    176

    ETHERNET CONFIGURATION

    EPL Service Configuration

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    176/242

    177

    Service Configuration Diagram

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    177/242

    178

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    178/242

    Time Slot Allocation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    179/242

    180

    EPL Configuration Steps

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    180/242

    181

    Creating Board

    Configuring Ethernet Board Interfaces

    External (Port): Access or Tag Aware

    Internal (VC Trunk): Tag aware

    Binding Path Configuration Creating EPL Service

    Configuring Cross connects From Ethernet board to Line Board

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    181/242

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    182/242

    Time Slot Allocation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    183/242

    184

    Port-Shared EPL Service Steps

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    184/242

    185

    Creating a board

    Configuring Ethernet interfaces

    Configuring bound paths

    Creating the PORT shared EPL service

    Configuring the cross-connect from Ethernet

    boards to SDH line boards

    Configuration of VCTRUNK Shared EPL Service

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    185/242

    186

    Implementation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    186/242

    187

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    187/242

    Implementation

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    188/242

    189

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    189/242

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    190/242

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    191/242

    192

    ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    192/242

    Complex Reconfiguration W/O ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    193/242

    194

    Why ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    194/242

    195

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    195/242

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    196/242

    Continue..

    High service availability beyond five 9s with

    h d t ti h

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    197/242

    198

    enhanced protection schemes

    Improved resiliency coexistence of dynamic

    restoration in mesh networks with superior SDH

    protection mechanisms

    Lower OPEX plug-and-play auto-discoverytopology allows dynamic allocation of network

    resources to routes, as needed

    Lower CAPEX leverages the existing XDM

    installed base with add-on ASON capabilities

    ASON Logical Structure

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    198/242

    199

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    199/242

    Transport Plane

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    200/242

    201

    The traditional SDH/WDM network is thetransport plane

    It transmits optical signals, configures cross-

    connection and protection switching for optical

    signals, and guarantees the reliability of all

    optical signals.

    Management Plane

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    201/242

    202

    Complement to the control plane

    It maintains the transport plane, the control plane

    and the whole system

    Its functions include performance management,

    fault management, configuration management

    and security management

    ASON Software

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    202/242

    203

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    203/242

    Link Management Module

    It uses the LMP protocol to perform the following

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    204/242

    205

    It uses the LMP protocol to perform the following

    functions.

    Creates and maintains the control channels

    Checks TE links

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    205/242

    Routing Module

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    206/242

    207

    It uses the OSPF-TE protocol to perform thefollowing functions:

    Collects and floods TE link information

    Collects and floods control link information

    Calculates service route and control route

    Cross-Connection Management zmodule

    It performs the following functions:

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    207/242

    208

    It performs the following functions:

    Creates/Deletes cross-connections

    Reports link state and alarms

    ASON Service Types

    SC: Switched Connection is a service connection requested by aterminal user and then created in the ASON control plane through

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    208/242

    209

    terminal user and then created in the ASON control plane through

    signaling

    PC: Permanent Connection is a service connection calculatedbeforehand and then created through the NM by issuing a command

    to NE

    SPC: SoftPermanent Connection, the connection between the userand the transmission network is configured directly by the NM. Theconnection within the transmission network is requested by the NM

    and then created by the NEs control plane through signaling

    Function Structure of ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    209/242

    210

    ASON NE

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    210/242

    211

    One of the topology components in the ASONCompared with traditional NEs, ASON NEs can

    support the link management, signaling, and

    routing functions

    NE ID has the same meaning regarding an

    ASON NE and a traditional NE

    TE link

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    211/242

    212

    It is a traffic engineering linkThe ASON NE sends its bandwidth information

    to other ASON NEs through the TE link to

    provide data for route comutation

    Distributed Vs Centralized ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    212/242

    213

    ASON Standard BodiesFocus on

    requirements

    and architecture

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    213/242

    214

    Inter-operabilityDemonstration

    GMPLS- ASON

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    214/242

    215

    ASON Protocols

    GMPLS (Routing, Signaling, Link Management)

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    215/242

    216

    OSPF-TE (routing)

    Flood and gather topology for calculating service path

    RSVP-TE (Signaling) Establish and maintain the service path

    LMP (Link Management)

    Discover the neighbors and links

    LMP

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    216/242

    217

    OSPF-TE

    Floods and collects the information about the

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    217/242

    218

    control links on the control plane

    Floods and collects the information about the TE

    links on the transport plane.

    The protocol then generates the information

    about the network service topologies for service

    trail computation

    RSVP-TEProtocol for resource reservation

    It is a type of signaling.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    218/242

    219

    RSVP-TE supports creation, deletion andchange of LSPs.

    Supports the following functions:

    LSP creation LSP deletion

    LSP attribute modification

    LSP rerouting LSP trail optimization

    Automatic Resource Discovery

    Each NE can search for the Neighboring NEs and can buildTopology map of whole network

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    219/242

    220

    p gy p

    Automatic Discovery of Control Links

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    220/242

    221

    End-End Service Configuration

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    221/242

    222

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    222/242

    223

    Service Characteristics

    Diamond Service

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    223/242

    224

    Diamond Service

    Gold Service

    Silver Service

    Copper Service

    Iron Service

    Diamond Service

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    224/242

    225

    Gold Service

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    225/242

    226

    Silver Service

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    226/242

    227

    Real Time Restoration. 100ms to 2s recovery time

    Copper Service

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    227/242

    228

    Iron Service

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    228/242

    229

    SLA

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    229/242

    230

    TunnelsTunnels are mainly used to carry VC-12 or VC-3

    services. Tunnels are also called as ASON server

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    230/242

    231

    trailsWhen lower order services are to be created, first

    create a VC-4 tunnel

    The protection level for the tunnel can be gold, silveror copper.

    Then, use the management system to complete the

    configuration of the lower order service

    Service Tunnel

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    231/242

    232

    Routing Policy

    Diamond and silver services all support the three

    rerouting polices:

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    232/242

    233

    Overlapping policy: During rerouting, the route of the

    new LSP overlaps the original route whenever

    possible.

    Separating policy: During rerouting, the route of thenew LSP is separated from the original route

    whenever possible.

    Best route policy: During rerouting, the best route is

    computed for the new LSP.

    Re-routing Strategies

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    233/242

    234

    Continue

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    234/242

    235

    Revertive ASON Trail

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    235/242

    236

    Service Association

    The service association can be used to associate

    the same service accessed from different points

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    236/242

    237

    into the ASON network

    Service association involves associating two

    ASON services that have different routes

    During the rerouting or optimization of eitherservice, the rerouting service avoids the route of

    the associated service.

    Service association is mainly used for services

    accessed from two points.

    Services Supported

    Supports the association of two silver services.

    Supports association of two copper services.

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    237/242

    238

    Supports the association of a silver service and a

    copper service.

    Supports the association of two silver tunnels.

    Supports the association of two copper tunnels.

    Supports the association of a silver tunnel and a

    copper tunnel.

    Service Migration

    Conversion between ASON services, and

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    238/242

    239

    between ASON services and traditional services.

    The service conversion is in-service conversion,

    which would not interrupt the services

    Service Optimization

    Frequent topology changes result in less

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    239/242

    240

    satisfactory routes

    Service optimization involves creating a new LSP

    Switching the optimized service to the new LSP

    Deleting the original LSP

    Optimize the service without disrupting the

    service

    SRLG

    The SRLG is the shared risk link group

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    240/242

    241

    Fibers in the same optical cable have the same

    risks

    ASON service should not be rerouted to another

    link that has the same risk.

    Shorten the service restoration time during ASON

    service rerouting

    Summary

    ASON-GMPLS is a future technology which

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    241/242

    242

    helps to minimize OPEX and realize fast serviceprovisioning

    Efficient utilization of bandwidth

    It requires more resources/infrastructure torealize mesh network topology

  • 7/29/2019 Ngsdh Final

    242/242

    Thank You