153%

212%

24%

72%

108%

10%

132%

188%

67% 69%

161%

61%

8%

-26%

30% 39%

130%

60%

23% 23% 25% 36%

18% 35%

-40%

-8% -25%

40%

13% 3%

-7%

38% 32% 34% 21% 24%

Africa AP CEE IGN WENA MENA

Global Raising relative growth

TMP TLP GCDP TN GCDP EP GIP TN GIP EP

Regional report Key Mos analysis per region

113%

196%

15%

69%

91%

0%

83%

142%

43% 45%

135%

29% 25% 40%

52% 53%

73%

99%

65% 78%

41% 47%

79%

56% 56%

11% 27% 30%

10% 19%

-16%

18% 1%

27%

-11%

10%

Africa AP CEE IGN WENA MENA

Global Matching Relative Growth

TMP TLP GCDP TN GCDP EP GIP TN GIP EP

-9%

46%

-39%

-4% -15%

-46%

16%

41%

4% 14%

50%

-10%

19%

55%

-2%

67%

113%

134%

57% 47%

13%

38%

94%

62%

38%

-5%

24% 27% 16%

4%

-29%

-3% -7%

6% 2%

-6% Africa P CEE IGN WENA MENA

Global Realisations Relative Growth

TMP TLP GCDP TN GCDP EP GIP TN GIP EP

GI

Regional report: Africa Key Mos and programme focus analysis per sub region

992

657 594

107 26 72

907 765 708

168 36 51

TMP TLP GCDP TN GCDP EP GIP TN GIP EP

Africa - Realisations Q3 2011 Q3 2012

1. The main program focus for each sub-region in Africa is GCDP ICX & OGX. This is very evident in Q3

performance, as GCDP TN and EP grew relatively (19% TN & 57% EP) and absolutely (114 TN & 61 EP).

However, Some countries also have GIP TN or EP as one of their focuses, for example: Nigeria, Ghana and

Kenya.

2. The main driver of this GCDP experience are the GCDP Projects that have been implemented across the region.

Each of these country or regional initiatives are aligned to an umbrella regional initiative: Active Contribution

Programme. This umbrella initiative also has an effect on other programmes across all entities like TMP & TLP.

The projects create an opportunity to provide team experiences for young people. This initiative is managed by a

co-ordinator working full time on behalf of the region, ensuring proper implementation and alignment of each

country’s initiative to ACP and also to the program focus: GCDP TN & EP.

3. Next Steps: Exploring GIP marketing: Some countries are exploring the GIP market through specific

segmentation, while others are solving visa issues which currently hinder GIP realisations. Also, sub-regions will

be reviewing their plan and programme focuses at sub-regional strategic meeting (WACs, Pioneers & MC EB in

South Africa) to ensure effecive planning towards programme growth.

1. Initiatives implemented in West Africa

include Leadership Career development,

Health Improvement, Education &

Literacy (Go west Africa & International

Language programme).

2. Southern Africa: Leadership Career

Development, Health Improvement,

Education & Literacy, (Projects via bus

campaign).

3. Eastern Africa: Leadership Career

development, Education & Literacy,

Economic growth.

4. Key Outcome:

(a) A more coordinated and self-

sustaining region, managed by the

regional Chair, ACP Coordinator, MCPs

and AI Africa responsible.

(b) Collaboration amongst MCPs

(c) A healthy region in global membership

status.

39

281 274

87

310 311

Southern Africa Eastern Africa Western Africa

Q3 GCDPi 2011 2012

6 21

80

9

55

104

Southern Africa Eastern Africa Western Africa

Q3 GCDPo 2011 2012

Regional Programme Focus:

GCDP (Outgoing and Incoming)

Regional report: AP Key Mos and programme focus analysis per sub region

3095

1596

2100 1758

728

262

4504

2258

3258

2585

688 254

TMP TLP GCDP TN GCDP EP GIP TN GIP EP

Asia Pacific - Realisations

Q3 2011 Q3 2012

AP Highlights

1. The Pacifics are progressing in their

november peak realisation

2. MoC is having a good result in raising

through their segmentation focus. India is

decreasing in GIP raising because of a

shortage in EP supply

3. The VIMPT is mostly dropping in GCDP

TN raises. Taiwan is up scaling-up GCDP

through GCDP TN raises.

4. Cambodia, Sri lanka, Pakistan and

Thailand are progressing in GCDP TN

raising.

Progressing AP Initiatives

5. AP ER Initiative: AP ER summit will be

held in MoC to increase sales activity and

initiatives in the region.

6. South East Asia Initiative: Currently

establishing virtual teams in coordinating

certain activities such as: Exchange intra

SEA, Regional partnerships, and talent

capacity.

7. Mandarin Initiative: Driven by MoC, in

raising Mandarin Speaking TNs in AP, where

during summer they sent CEEDers to

specific entities to carry out sales activities.

218

107

57

102 83

157

67

147

75 58

INDONESIA MALAYSIA TAIWAN THEPHILIPPINES

VIETNAM

Subregional focus VIMPT: GCDP (incoming)

GCDP TN Ra 2011 GCDP TN Ra 2012

73

8 4 20

9 0 0

105

4 21

121

35

Programme Focus: GCDP (incoming)

GCDP TN Ra 2011 GCDP TN Ra 2012

765

118

599

185

INDIA MAINLANDCHINA

India/MoC; GIP incoming

GIP TN Ra 2011

GIP TN Ra 2012

75 68

141

75

AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND

Pacific: GCDP (outgoing)

GCDP EP Ra 2011

GCDP EP Ra 2012

25

62

12 20

42

15

HONGKONG

JAPAN SINGAPORE

HK, JP, SG: GIP incoming

GIP TN Ra 2011 GIP TN Ra 2012

Regional report: CEE Key Mos and programme focus analysis per sub region

17

56

10 19

91

34

61

18 29

106

HUNGARY POLAND SLOVAKIA CZECHREPUBLIC

TURKEY

Central Europe+Turkey: Q3 GIP TN Matching: 2011 2012

9

14

2

11

24

11

ESTONIA LITHUANIA LATVIA

Baltics: Q3 EP Raising 2011 2012

80

55

113 95

RUSSIA UKRAINE

Russia & Ukraine: Q3 GCDP TN Match

2011 2012

9 6 11

22

1 0

20

7

50

26 30

0

CR

OA

TIA

RE

P.

MA

CE

DO

NIA

SE

RB

IA

SL

OV

EN

IA

BO

SN

IA -

HE

RZ

EG

OV

INA

AL

BA

NIA

Balkans: Q3 GIP EP Raise 2011 2012

1 6

44

9 2 0

5 2

47

19

0 0

AR

ME

NIA

AZ

ER

BA

IJA

N

GE

OR

GIA

KA

ZA

KH

ST

AN

KY

RG

YZ

ST

AN

TA

JIK

IST

AN

Central Asia-Caucasus: Q3 GCDP EP Raise

2011 2012

49

14 6

87

23

7

ROMANIA BULGARIA MOLDOVA

Romania/Bulgaria/Moldova: Q3 GCDP EP Match

2011 2012

CEE Highlight

1. Central Europe & Turkey works on GIP delivery

and managed to increase at a good rate.

2. Baltics countries had a breakthrough in the past

quarter in GIP EP Raising.

3. Russia and Ukraine prepared themselves for

non-peak TN realizations.

4. The Former Yugoslavia sub region is doing good

in GIP EP raising.

5. Some CYs in CAC had a breakthrough in GCDP

EP raising.

Strategic Activities in CEE

1. CEE Technical EP Center: With a good

network of technical universities in CEE, a lot of

countries in CEE focus on a technical product for

students. AIESEC International is working closely

with CEE for this initiative. A GIP strategic meeting

was organized to support the delivery of this

strategy.

2. Regional Initiative: 1) Technical GIP EP CEE

Center; 2) Regional GCDP Project; 3) CEED in

CEE

3. Sub regional initiative: With different focuses,

sub regions have developed their sub regional

initiatives.

4. Virtual space for MCP discussion/MCVP

recruitment discussion organized by CEE

coordinator.

Regional report: Iberoamerica Key Mos and programme focus analysis per sub region

5556

1676

514 493 150 256

5315

1909

856 682 191 272

TMP TLP GCDP TN GCDP EP GIP TN GIP EP

Iberoamerica - Q3 Realisations

Q3 2011 Q3 2012

9 3 0

42 51

18

0 8

4

17

0

76

33

20

4

31

South America subregion; Q3 GCDP (outgoing)

oGCDP 2011oGCDP 2012

1 1

2

3

2

0

6

CA

S -

CO

STA

RIC

A

CA

S -

PA

NA

MA

DO

MIN

ICA

NR

EP

UB

LIC

EL

SA

LV

AD

OR

GU

AT

EM

AL

A

NIC

AR

AG

UA

PU

ER

TO

RIC

O

Central America sub region:: Q3 GCDP (outgoing)

oGCDP 2011

46 43

9

73

52

20

BRAZIL COLOMBIA MEXICO

Bra-Col-Mex: Q3 GIP (incoming)

iGIP 2011 iGIP 2012

Iberoamerica highlights

A key strategy of the region was to support the

scaling up of GCDP operations with a subregional

approach both for iGCDP and for oGCDP.

Nevertherless, IGN was able to grow in all

programmes (except of TMP).

Outcome: we can see a growth of 67% in iGCDP and

38% in oGCDP.

The next steps in the region are connected with

Dec/Jan realizations: a peak time for GCDP

GCDP actitivites in IGN

oGCDP grew 38% in this subregion. The main

driver of growth are clearly Perù, Venezuela and

Ecuador which are putting lot of focus on this

programme as it is their cash cow activity.

The outstanding growth of Perù can be associated

with the implementation of a national product

which helped them to standardise and improve

processes.

Also, in the Central America subregion, oGCDP grew

as it is the key programme.

There is potential to grow especially because oGCDP

can be a key driver of talent capacity , a current

bottleneck in the subregion, therefore proper re-

GIP in IGN

iGIP grew 27% in the region and the main driver of

growth is this subregion with 122% relative

growth for Mexico, 59% for Brasil and 21% for

Colombia.

This results are a consequence of the development

of sales teams in the entities and taking a

subproduct approach which can give more Raising

focus. The next step for the subregion is still the

iGIP Ra and the development of a strong sales

team.

Regional report: Middle East & North Africa Key Mos and programme focus analysis per sub region

530

252 196

298

44 87

451 377

418

578

51 89

TMP TLP GCDPTN

GCDPEP

GIP TN GIP EP

Middle East & North Africa Realisations

Q3 2011 Q3 2012

11

2 0

19

1

16

IRAN JORDAN LEBANON

Levant/Iran: Q3 GCDP (outgoing)

OGCDP 2011 OGCDP 2012

3

130

2 38

3

231

43

106

ALGERIA EGYPT MOROCCO TUNISIA

North Africa subregion: Q3 GCDP (incoming)

IGCDP 2011 IGCDP 2012

14

5 0

4

41

7 3 1

BAHRAIN OMAN QATAR UNITED ARABEMIRATES

OGCDP 2011 OGCDP 2012

Gulf subregion: Q3 GCDP

1. Actions: Focus on GCDP, hosting the 1st MENA LCP summit,

open applications for coordinator, focused on transferring the

right functional knowledge from one country to the other, internal

CEEDership program planned. MCPs & LCPs aligned to global

strategies through IC & MENACo. New planning methods were

introduced.

2. Result: A higher level of operational knowledge in the region,

higher results in GCDP, higher & accurate goals set for the term

with proper time lines, more internal connection, right growth

strategies are being implemented

3. Next Steps: start the CEED program to cover all knowledge

gaps, North Africa conference & have a conference for LCVPs

only. Capitalize on Gulfco to align LCVPs & members to global

strategies

1. Actions: Focus on OGCDP, align Gulfco’s agenda with

MENACo’s output & with global strategies

2. Result: Growth in Bahrain & with the rest it should show in the

next peak. Re-planning after MENACo which led to much a

higher goal

3. Next Steps: Make sure they are using the right strategies to

grow, follow Bahrain’s growth path, delivery of Gulfco

successfully

1. Action: Focus on IGCDP, increase functional knowledge &

increase awareness of what’s happening globally. Clarity of LCP

role & clarity on planning techniques

2. Result: Growth in almost all of them in IGCDP.

Implementation of GCPs from the network. More ownership and

decision-making power to LCPs

3. Trend to highlight: Egypt’s growth model

4. Next Steps in the region: Have a North Africa conference

1. Action: Focus on OGCDP & aim for higher goals, functional

knowledge delivered. Implementation of GCPs in the network.

More ownership to LCPs

2. Results will show more in the upcoming oGCDP peak. But in

general higher accurate goals are set for the term & countries

are all very focused on growing OGCDP.

3467

1381

120

986

325 502

1877

1241

281

1602

339 470

TMP TLP GCDP TN GCDP EP GIP TN GIP EP

Western Europe & North America Realisations

Q3 2011 Q3 2012

139

55

77

30 24

137

44

97

38 30

Germ

an S

p,

Fra

nce

Bene

lux

Na

t. E

nglis

h S

p.

Me

diterr

ane

ans

No

rdic

s

iGIP: Q3 WENA Sub Regions

22 22 28

5

29

38

19

11

CA

NA

DA

UN

ITE

D S

TA

TE

S

UN

ITE

DK

ING

DO

M

IRE

LA

ND

Q3 11-12

Q3 12-13

iGIP: Q3 Nat. English Speaking C.

150

49

222

49 35

114

47

212

87

34

Ger

man

Sp

,F

ran

ce

Ben

elu

x

Nat

. En

gli

shSp

.

Med

iter

ran

ean

s No

rdic

s

oGIP: Q3 WENA Sub Regions 28

11

4 3

26

19 15

3

ITA

LY

GR

EE

CE

PO

RT

UG

AL

MA

LT

A

Q3 11-12

Q3 12-13

oGIP: Q3 Mediterraneans

150

49

222

49 35

114

47

212

87

34

Ger

man

Sp

,F

ran

ce

Ben

elu

x

Nat

. En

gli

shSp

.

Med

iter

ran

ean

s No

rdic

s

Q3 11-12

Q3 12-13

iGCDP: Q3 WENA Sub Regions

57

10 14 4 4

135

43 28

6 1

ITA

LY

GR

EE

CE

PO

RT

UG

AL

MA

LT

A

SPA

IN

iGCDP - Q3 Mediterraneans

Regional report: Western Europe and North America Key Mos and programme focus analysis per sub region

1. Drop in TMP experiences provided by 45%. We

can’t assess the accuracy as in Q3 2011 we

were measuring Members and not experiences.

2. Significant growth in oGCDP in all WENA sub-

regions. Total growth 38% coming mainly from a

good pipeline from the previous term.

3. Regional Initiatives: a. Increase of active

membership,b) WENA LCPs leadership

development, c) oGCDP massive growth

1. Stagnancy in GIP realizations, but growth in

iGIP Matches by 26%, a key driver is raising

native English Speakers.

2. Key Strategies: Global Development Program

for sales, Sales Campaigns, sub product focus.

3. Output Expected: Massive growth in GIP TN

raising in the next 2 months (October –

November).

4. Next Steps: NAFTA summit

1. Key Strategies: Student market segmentation

based on S&D, recruitment channels

enhancement (Uni partnerships, Youth

Alliances).

2. Output Expected: Growth in GIP EP raised,

and massive growth in key sub products like

Marketing, BA, IT.

3. Trend: Sufficient increase in the rate between

EP Ra to EP Ma.

1. Key strategies: Scaling up GCDP TNs

through projects and creating a sustainable

GCDP programme through better product

packaging to different stakeholders (NGOs,

Schools, Host families, and Corporates)

2. Outcome expected: A sustainable GCDP

programme through it’s own source of revenue.

3. Trends: Growth comes from AIESEC in Italy

who are inspiring other entities in the sub

region to grow.