Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
New zero Poisson’s ratio models
Vladimir Gaal,1 Varlei Rodrigues,1 Socrates E. Dantas,2 Douglas S. Galvão,3
and Alexandre F. Fonseca3, a)
1)Applied Physics Department, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-
970, Brazil.
2)Physics Department, Science Institute, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora,
Juiz de Fora, MG, 36036-330, Brazil.
3)Applied Physics Department, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-
970, Brazil.
Most materials exhibit positive Poisson’s ratio (PR) values but special structures
can also present negative and, even rarer, zero (or close to zero) PR. Null PR
structures have received much attention due to their unusual properties and
potential applications in different fields, such as aeronautics and bio-engineering.
Here, we present a new and simple near-zero PR 2D topological model based on
a structural block composed of two smooth and rigid bars connected by a soft
membrane or spring. It is not based on re-entrant or honeycomb-like
configurations, which have been the basis of many null or quasi-null PR models.
Our topological model was 3D printed and the experimentally obtained PR was
−0.003 ± 0.001, which is one the closest to zero value ever reported. This
topological model can be easily extended to 3D systems and with compression in
any direction. The advantages and disadvantages of these models are also
addressed.
Formally defined by Poisson in 1827,1 the so-called Poisson’s ratio (PR) is
largely used to characterize material mechanical properties.2 PR is defined as
the negative ratio of transverse strain (εx) to longitudinal strain (εz) along the
direction of a stretching or a compression stress σz = εx / εz.3,4
The vast majority of materials present positive PR since εx and εz usually have
opposite signs, i. e., they expand (contract) crosswise - x direction - when
compressed (tensioned) longwise - z direction. A few materials possess negative
PR (so-called auxetics),5–7 i. e., they contract (expand) laterally when
compressed (tensioned) longitudinally. Auxeticity has been seen in foams,5,6,8
crystalline hinged structures,9,10 nanomaterials,11 and in certain extreme states
of matter.12 Zero or close to zero PR materials, i. e., materials that neither
contract nor expand laterally under the application of tensile or compressive
stresses such as, for example, cork2,13 and entangled springs,14,15 are even
rarer and have received much attention towards applications in different fields as
aeronautics16,17 medicine,18 and tissue engineering.19
One paradigm for the negative PR behavior is the so-called re-entrant
honeycomb structures, which are structures with inward protruded ribs,6,20,21
see Fig. 1(a). Semi-re-entrant structures, Fig. 1(b), combine regular (positive PR)
and re-entrant (negative PR) honeycomb topologies in such a way that they
cancel each other and the net effect is a null PR behavior.22 This has been
exploited to create zero or quasi zero PR structures, such as SILICOMB,23,24
chevron,22,25,26 accordion,16,27 among others.28–31 This plethora of
geometrical models indicates the actual in- terest in developing and improving
such a special and rare type of structure.
In this work, we propose a new type of topological model that presents near-zero
PR under compression, which was experimentally realized using 3D printer
technology. The model consists of an array of building blocks, as described
below. It is important to stress that our model is not based on semi-re-entrant, re-
entrant or regular honeycomb structures.
The building blocks of our model are composed of two parallel rigid bars with
smooth surfaces and a soft and elastic membrane or spring connecting the rigid
bars. Thereafter, the spring direction will be addressed as BAD - block axial
direction. Fig. 1(c) presents the idealized model and Fig. 1(d) the 3D printed
model where the curved membranes play the role of the spring.
The model array is generated by combining the building blocks in a way their
BADs are mixed into two orthogonal directions, i. e., always parallel and/or
perpendicular to each other. One example of a 2D array of 3 × 4 blocks is shown
in Fig. 2. When compressed along the z direction by a σz stress, the blocks that
have their BADs parallel to z will get squeezed, following and accommodating εz
strain. The blocks with BADs orthogonal to the compression direction will only
slide, without deformation, because of the rigid bars. The length of the system
along x direction remains the same. These two mechanisms together led to zero
PR behavior. If the stress is released, the system almost elastically recovers its
initial configuration because the rigid bars have smooth surfaces and the friction
energy dissipation can be neglected. Also, if we apply a compressive stress
along the x direction instead of the z one, the effect will be the same, leading
again to a zero PR. The mechanism of our model does not rely on a combination
of positive and negative PR structures, as in the semi-re-entrant ones22, but on
the emergence of a zero PR in two dimensions from a system having already a
zero PR in one direction. As the building blocks are not structurally bonded, it
should be stressed that our model cannot be used in applications that depend on
tensile stresses. In this sense, it can be considered as an intermediate structure
between the fully connected structure of corks and the fully unconnected
structure of the gases, both presenting zero or close to zero PR.4 This model can
be easily extended to a 3D system and with compression in any direction. It
suffices to have building blocks with BAD oriented both parallel and
perpendicular to each other along any direction.
Our model was 3D printed with a homemade system (fused deposition
modeling)32 using standard commercial polylactic acid thermoplastic filament.
The soft spring is composed of two relatively thin membranes bonded at their
middle and then to two rigid bars, Fig. 1(d). In Fig. 3, we present a 3 × 4
assembly of printed blocks used to demonstrate the null PR behavior.
A compressive stress was applied to the structure shown in Fig. 3, along the z
direction, and the whole process was video recorded with a resolution of 1980
pixels × 1080 pixels and 30 fps (see the supplementary material). The z and x
length values were obtained by processing, frame by frame, the experiment
video using a python script. In Fig. 4 we present time evolution of the measured
lengths along the z and x directions of the 3 × 4 assembled blocks during
compression. It is clear from this Figure that, considering the error bars, the
system size along x direction remains practically constant, thus characterizing a
near-zero Poisson regime. From these data, we obtained PR = −0.003 ± 0.001.
These results show that our model provides an alternative way to create close to
zero PR systems. Just for comparison, cork, beryllium, diamond and graphene
sponge PRs are about 0.064,13 0.05,33 ≤ 0.0534 and 0.04,35 respectively.
Other relevant structures, such as SILICOMB proto- types made of ABS plastic
have PR between −0.03 and 0.05,23 patellar surface of canine femoral articular
cartilage have PR ∼ 0.07,36 and semi re-entrant semiflexynes molecules
obtained by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations present PR about 0.01.25
In summary, we propose a new type and very simple geometrical 2D model that
presents near- zero PR under compression. It is important to stress that our
model is not based on semi-re-entrant, re-entrant or regular honeycomb
structures, which have been the basis of many structural zero PR reported in the
literature. Our model was experimentally realized using 3D printer technology.
The obtained PR values were PR = −0.003 ± 0.001, which are ones of the
closest to zero PR values ever produced. This topological model can be easily
extended to 3D systems and with compression along any direction. We hope the
present work will stimulate further studies along these lines.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
See supplementary material for the video showing the compression of our 3 × 4
system.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
A.F.F. and D.S.G. are fellows of the Brazilian Agency CNPq through grants
numbers #311587/2018- 6 and #307331/2014-8, respectively. A.F.F. and D.S.G.
acknowledge grants from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) numbers
#2018/02992-4 and #2013/08293-7 respectively.
REFERENCES
1S. D. Poisson, “Note sur l’Extension des Fils et des Plaques élastiques,”
Annales de Chimie et de Physique 36, 384 (1827).
2G. N. Greaves, “Poisson’s ratio over two centuries: Challenging hypotheses,”
Notes and Records of the Royal Society 67, 37–58 (2013).
3D. R. Askeland, P. P. Fulay, and W. J. Wright, The Science and Engineering of
Materials, SI Edition, 6th ed. (CENGAGE Learning, Stamford, USA, 2011).
4G. N. Greaves, A. L. Greer, R. S. Lakes, and T. Rouxel, “Poisson’s ratio and
modern materials,” Nature Materials 10, 823–837 (2011).
5K. E. Evans, M. A. Nkansah, I. J. Hutchinson, and S. C. Rogers, “Molecular
network design,” Nature 353, 124 (1991).
6R. Lakes, “Foam Structures with a Negative Poisson’s Ratio,” Science 235,
1038 (1987).
7R. Lakes, “Advances in negative poisson’s ratio materials,” Advanced Materials
5, 293–296 (1993).
8B. Brandel and R. S. Lakes, “Negative Poisson’s ratio polyethylene foams,”
Journal of Materials Science 36, 5885–5893 (2001).
9D. S. Galvão and R. H. Baughman, “Crystalline networks with unusual predicted
mechanical and thermal properties,” Nature 365, 735–737 (1993).
10R. H. Baughman, S. Stafström, C. Cui, and S. O. Dantas, “Materials with
negative compressibilities in one or more dimensions,” Science 279, 1522–1524
(1998).
11H. S. Park and S. Y. Kim, “A perspective on auxetic nanomaterials,” Nano
Convergence 4, 10 (2017).
12R. H. Baughman, S. O. Dantas, S. Stafström, A. A. Zakhidov, T. B. Mitchell,
and D. H. E. Dubin, “Negative poisson’s ratios for extreme states of matter,”
Science 288, 2018–2022 (2000).
13M. A. Fortes and M. T. Nogueira, “The Poisson Effect in Cork,” Materials
Science and Engi- neering: A 122, 227–232 (1989).
14D. Rodney, B. Gadot, O. R. Martinez, S. R. du Roscoat, and L. Orgéas,
“Reversible dilatancy in entangled single-wire materials,” Nature Materials 15,
72–77 (2016).
15R. H. Baughman and A. F. Fonseca, “Straining to expand entanglements,”
Nature Materials 15, 7–8 (2016).
16J. Chen, X. Shen, and J. Li, “Zero Poisson’s ratio flexible skin for potential two-
dimensional wing morphing,” Aerospace Science and Technology 45, 228–241
(2015).
17E. A. Bubert, B. K. Woods, K. Lee, C. S. Kothera, and N. M. Wereley, “Design
and fabrication of a passive 1D morphing aircraft skin,” Journal of Intelligent
Material Systems and Structures 21, 1699–1717 (2010).
18P. Soman, D. Y. Fozdar, J. W. Lee, A. Phadke, S. Varghese, and S. Chen, “A
three-dimensional polymer scaffolding material exhibiting a zero Poisson’s ratio,”
Soft Matter 8, 4946–4951 (2012).
19G. C. Engelmayr, M. Cheng, C. J. Bettinger, J. T. Borenstein, R. Langer, and
L. E. Freed, “Accordion-like honeycombs for tissue engineering of cardiac
anisotropy,” Nature Materials 7, 1003–1010 (2008).
20A. G. Kolpakov, “Determination of the average characteristics of elastic
frameworks,” Prikl. Matem. Mekhan. 49, 969–977 (1985).
21L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby, Cellular solids, Structure and properties, 6th ed.
(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).
22J. N. Grima, L. Oliveri, D. Attard, B. Ellul, R. Gatt, G. Cicala, and G. Recca,
“Hexagonal hon- eycombs with zero Poisson’s ratios and enhanced stiffness,”
Advanced Engineering Materials 12, 855–862 (2010).
23C. Lira, F. Scarpa, M. Olszewska, and M. Celuch, “The SILICOMB cellular
structure: Me- chanical and dielectric properties,” Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic
Research 246, 2055–2062 (2009).
24K. Virk, A. Monti, T. Trehard, M. Marsh, K. Hazra, K. Boba, C. D. Remillat, F.
Scarpa, and I. R. Farrow, “SILICOMB PEEK Kirigami cellular structures:
Mechanical response and en- ergy dissipation through zero and negative
stiffness,” Smart Materials and Structures 22, 084014 (2013).
25J. N. Grima and D. Attard, “Molecular networks with a near zero Poisson’s
ratio,” Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research 248, 111–116 (2011). 26D.
Attard and J. N. Grima, “Modelling of hexagonal honeycombs exhibiting zero
Poisson’s ratio,” Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research 248, 52–59 (2011).
27K. R. Olympio and F. Gandhi, “Zero poisson’s ratio cellular honeycombs for
flex skins undergoing one-dimensional morphing,” Journal of Intelligent Material
Systems and Structures 21, 1737–1753 (2010).
28J. Huang, X. Gong, Q. Zhang, F. Scarpa, Y. Liu, and J. Leng, “In-plane
mechanics of a novel zero Poisson’s ratio honeycomb core,” Composites Part B:
Engineering 89, 67–76 (2016).
29Y. Chen and M. H. Fu, “Mechanical Properties of a Novel Zero Poisson’s Ratio
Honeycomb,” Advanced Engineering Materials 20, 1700452 (2018).
30J. Huang, W. Liu, and A. Tang, “Effects of fine-scale features on the elastic
properties of zero Poisson’s ratio honeycombs,” Materials Science and
Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology 236-237, 95–103
(2018).
31J. Huang, Q. Zhang, F. Scarpa, Y. Liu, and J. Leng, “Multi-stiffness topology
optimization of zero Poisson’s ratio cellular structures,” Composites Part B:
Engineering 140, 35–43 (2018).
32G. Gaal, M. Mendes, T. P. de Almeida, M. H. Piazzetta, Â. L. Gobbi, A. Riul,
and V. Rodrigues, “Simplified fabrication of integrated microfluidic devices using
fused deposition modeling 3d printing,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 242,
35 – 40 (2017).
33A. Migliori, H. Ledbetter, D. J. Thoma, and T. W. Darling, “Beryllium’s
monocrystal and polycrystal elastic constants,” Journal of Applied Physics 95,
2436–2440 (2004).
34E. Anastassakis and M. Siakavellas, “Elastic properties of textured diamond
and silicon,” Journal of Applied Physics 90, 144–152 (2001).
35Y. Wu, N. Yi, L. Huang, T. Zhang, S. Fang, H. Chang, N. Li, J. Oh, J. A. Lee,
M. Kozlov, A. C. Chipara, H. Terrones, P. Xiao, G. Long, Y. Huang, F. Zhang, L.
Zhang, X. Lepró, C. Haines, M. D. Lima, N. P. Lopez, L. P. Rajukumar, A. L.
Elias, S. Feng, S. J. Kim, N. T. Narayanan, P. M. Ajayan, M. Terrones, A. Aliev,
P. Chu, Z. Zhang, R. H. Baughman, and Y. Chen, “Three- dimensionally bonded
spongy graphene material with super compressive elasticity and near-zero
Poisson’s ratio,” Nature Communications 6, 6141 (2015).
36J. S. Jurvelin, J. P. A. Arokoski, E. B. Hunziker, and H. J. Helminen,
“Topographical variation of the elastic properties of articular cartilage in the
canine knee,” Journal of Biomechanics 33, 669–675 (2000).
FIG. 1. Models for negative and zero PR structures. (a) re-entrant structure; (b)
semi-re-entrant structure; (c) building block of the zero PR model proposed here,
composed by two rigid bars (gray) and one soft spring connecting them; and (d)
the 3D printing block where the curved membranes play the rule of springs in (c)
model. The arrows below panels (c) and (d) indicate the corresponding direction
of the block axial direction (BAD). See manuscript for details.
FIG. 2. (a) One example of an assembled zero PR system formed by an array of
3 × 4 blocks. (b) The expected structure after the action of a compressive stress,
σz, applied along the z direction.
FIG. 3. 3 x 4 array of building blocks assembled with BAD’s blocks oriented both
along and perpendicular to a z direction. See the video in supplementary material
for the compression of this structure.
FIG. 4. Time evolution measurements of z and x lengths during compression in z
direction.