9
New York New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Criminal Law Criminal Law Voting and Decisional Voting and Decisional Patterns: Patterns: Focus on Rosenblatt Focus on Rosenblatt Vincent Martin Bonventre, J.D., Ph.D. Vincent Martin Bonventre, J.D., Ph.D.

New York Court of Appeals

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

New York Court of Appeals. Criminal Law Voting and Decisional Patterns: Focus on Rosenblatt Vincent Martin Bonventre, J.D., Ph.D. November 2005. Pre-Rosenblatt. Late Wachtler era Pro-prosecution record Wachtler/Bellacosa v. Kaye/Titone Post-Wachtler Pro-defendant swing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: New York Court of Appeals

New YorkNew YorkCourt of AppealsCourt of Appeals

Criminal LawCriminal Law

Voting and Decisional Patterns:Voting and Decisional Patterns:

Focus on RosenblattFocus on Rosenblatt

Vincent Martin Bonventre, J.D., Ph.D.Vincent Martin Bonventre, J.D., Ph.D.

November 2005November 2005

Page 2: New York Court of Appeals

Pre-RosenblattPre-Rosenblatt Late Wachtler eraLate Wachtler era

Pro-prosecution recordPro-prosecution recordWachtler/Bellacosa v. Kaye/TitoneWachtler/Bellacosa v. Kaye/Titone

Post-WachtlerPost-WachtlerPro-defendant swingPro-defendant swingWachtler Court – Kaye Court transitionWachtler Court – Kaye Court transition

Emerging Kaye CourtEmerging Kaye CourtPro-defendant swing persistsPro-defendant swing persistsKaye/Titone/G.B. Smith/Ciparick “liberal” majorityKaye/Titone/G.B. Smith/Ciparick “liberal” majority

Post Court-BashingPost Court-BashingPro-prosecution “adjustment”Pro-prosecution “adjustment”Kaye/Ciparick voting shiftKaye/Ciparick voting shift

Page 3: New York Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals: Criminal Law VotingPre-Rosenblatt

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Judge (Pro-Defendant Voting Percent: divided criminal decisions)

Source: Vincent M. Bonventre, Albany Law School (previously published studies) 11/05

Pro

-Def

end

ant

Vo

tin

g P

erce

nt

1990 & 1991 91 48 26 17 4

post W / early K (11/92-5/94) 81 52 63 63 48 24 13

1994 & 1995 81 45 65 60 45 15 25

Fall '96 thru Spring '98 80 47 53 27 27 31 33 0

Fall '97 thru Spring '99 100 69 46 31 31 50 8 15

Titone (- '98)

GB Smith Ciparick Kaye COURTLevine

('93 - '02)Wachtler

( -'92)Bellacosa ( - '00)

Wesley ('97 - '03)

Page 4: New York Court of Appeals

Early RosenblattEarly Rosenblatt RepriseReprise

Emerging Kaye CourtEmerging Kaye CourtPost Court-bashingPost Court-bashing

Rosenblatt’s First 3 YearsRosenblatt’s First 3 YearsTitone to RosenblattTitone to RosenblattKaye/Ciparick shift persistsKaye/Ciparick shift persistsCourt’s pro-prosecution recordCourt’s pro-prosecution recordPataki’s appointeesPataki’s appointeesRosenblatt: the “non” Pataki Rosenblatt: the “non” Pataki

appointeeappointee

Page 5: New York Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals: Criminal Law VotingEarly [and recently pre-] Rosenblatt Years

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Judge (Pro-Defendant Voting Percent: divided criminal decisions)

Source: Vincent M. Bonventre, Albany Law School (previously published studies) 11/05

Pro

-Def

end

ant

Vo

tin

g P

erce

nt

1994 & 1995 81 45 65 60 45 15 25

'97/'98 thru '98/'99 100 69 46 31 31 50 8 15

1999 thru 2001 61 29 39 28 41 35 17 0

2001 56 22 22 11 33 33 0 0

Titone ( - 98)

GB Smith Ciparick Kaye COURTLevine

('93 - '02)

ROSEN- BLATT ('99 - )

Bellacosa ( - '00)

Wesley ('97 - '03)

Graffeo ('01 - )

Page 6: New York Court of Appeals

The Rosenblatt YearsThe Rosenblatt Years RepriseReprise

Rosenblatt’s first 3 yearsRosenblatt’s first 3 years Pataki’s Majority?Pataki’s Majority?

Titone to RosenblattTitone to RosenblattBellacosa to GraffeoBellacosa to GraffeoLevine to ReadLevine to Read[Simons to] Wesley to R.S. Smith[Simons to] Wesley to R.S. Smith

Court Court ReRe-Adjustment-AdjustmentKaye/Ciparick Kaye/Ciparick rere-shift-shiftPataki’s judges: Wesley, Graffeo, ReadPataki’s judges: Wesley, Graffeo, Read““Non” Pataki judges: Rosenblatt & (?) R.S. Non” Pataki judges: Rosenblatt & (?) R.S.

SmithSmith Court’s Pro-defendant Swing Back (?)Court’s Pro-defendant Swing Back (?)

Page 7: New York Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals: Criminal Law VotingThe Rosenblatt Years

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Judge (Pro-Defendant Voting Percent: divided criminal decisions)

Source: Vincent M. Bonventre, Albany Law School 11/05

Pro

-Def

end

ant

Vo

tin

g P

erce

nt

1999 thru 2001 61 29 39 28 41 35 17 0

Fall '01 thru Spring '03 67 48 43 19 18 24 10 10 0

Fall '03 thru Spring'05 70 63 63 41 52 11 11 35

Fall '01 thru Spring '05 (total 4yrs) 69 56 54 31 18 40 10 10 10 35

GB Smith Ciparick Kaye COURTLevine

('93 - '02)

ROSEN- BLATT ('99 - )

Wesley ('97 - '03)

Graffeo ('01 - )

Read ('03 - )

RS Smith ('04 - )

Page 8: New York Court of Appeals

Rosenblatt / Current Rosenblatt / Current CourtCourt

Re-Re-Emerging Pro-defendant WingEmerging Pro-defendant WingG.B. SmithG.B. SmithKaye/CiparickKaye/Ciparick

Solid Pro-prosecution VotesSolid Pro-prosecution VotesGraffeo to ReadGraffeo to Read

The Less Predictable SmithThe Less Predictable Smith Rosenblatt in the CenterRosenblatt in the Center An Unmistakable SpectrumAn Unmistakable Spectrum

G.B. Smith/Kaye/CiparickG.B. Smith/Kaye/CiparickGraffeo/ReadGraffeo/ReadRosenblatt/R.S. SmithRosenblatt/R.S. Smith

Page 9: New York Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals: Criminal Law VotingRosenblatt in the Current Court

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Judge (Pro-Defendant Voting Percent: divided criminal decisions)

Source: Vincent M. Bonventre, Albany Law School 11/05

Pro

-Def

end

ant

Vo

tin

g P

erce

nt

Fall '01 thru Spring '03 67 48 43 24 19 10 0

Fall '03 thru Spring '05 70 63 63 52 41 35 11 11

Fall 01 thru Spring '05 (total 4yrs) 69 56 54 40 31 35 10 10

GB Smith Ciparick Kaye ROSEN- BLATT ('99 - )

COURTRS Smith

('04 - )Graffeo ('01 - )

Read ('03 - )