Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
AMINREZA NESHAT
FK 2014 30
ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY AND NITRATE CONTAMINATION RISK USING GIS-BASED DRASTIC MODEL WITH
HYBRID STATISTICAL AND PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUES
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY AND NITRATE
CONTAMINATION RISK USING GIS-BASED DRASTIC MODEL WITH
HYBRID STATISTICAL AND PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUES
By
AMINREZA NESHAT
Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia
in Fulfillment of the Requirements for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
AUGUST 2014
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
ii
COPYRIGHT
All material contained within the thesis, including without limitation text, logos, icons,
photographs and all other artwork, is copyright material of Universiti Putra Malaysia
unless otherwise stated. Use may be made of any material contained within the thesis for
non-commercial purposes from the copyright holder. Commercial use of material may
only be made with the express, prior, written permission of Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Copyright © Universiti Putra Malaysia
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
iii
To my father
and
To the spirit of my lovely mother
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
iv
Abstract of the thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfillment
of the requirement for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy
ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY AND NITRATE
CONTAMINATION RISK USING GIS-BASED DRASTIC MODEL WITH
HYBRID STATISTICAL AND PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUES
By
AMINREZA NESHAT
August 2014
Chairman: Assoc. Prof. Biswajeet Pradhan, PhD
Faculty: Engineering
Groundwater pollution is one of the most significant environmental problems today. It
is caused by human activities, especially agricultural activities. Agricultural systems
developed from traditional methods to modern applications, resulting in an overuse of
chemical fertilizers that increase the amount of pollutants. Fertilizers such as nitrates
play a significant role in water and soil pollution because of their special
characteristics. Most of these fertilizers enter the groundwater through surplus water
and create high-risk groundwater resources. Therefore, identifying and diagnosing the
amount of pollutants using a groundwater risk map in the future can largely prevent
more pollution in groundwater resources. Efficient preventive programs, such as risk
management, should be implemented to reduce the risks of groundwater pollution.
In this research, the DRASTIC approach based on a geographic information system
(GIS) was applied to evaluate groundwater vulnerability in Kerman Plain (Iran), an
arid and semi-arid region that encounters intensive agricultural activities and over
exploitation of land that has resulted in groundwater contamination. DRASTIC model
includes seven parameters of depth to water (D), net recharge (R), aquifer media (A),
soil media (S), topography (T), impact of vadose zone (I), and hydraulic conductivity
(C) of the Kerman Plain. The original DRASTIC model was applied and integrated
using original rates and weights. The generation of groundwater vulnerability map was
performed by optimizing the rates and weights of DRASTIC model using GIS
modeling techniques. The models used were analytical hierarchy process (AHP),
single parameter sensitivity analysis (SPSA), frequency ratio (FR), and Wilcoxon non-
parametric model. The optimized rates and weights were computed using each model.
The Wilcoxon non-parametric test and FR analysis were applied to optimize the rates
of DRASTIC model. AHP method was also used to optimize both the rates and the
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
v
weights of DRASTIC model, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to optimize only
the weights of DRASTIC model. These methods were assigned to DRASTIC model
and integrated to produce hybrid methods. So far, some of the generated hybrid
methods using the abovementioned models have not been applied in other studies.
The most proper optimization of the vulnerability map was determined using Pearson’s
coefficient correlation. The Pearson’s correlation value of each modified DRASTIC
model used in this study was calculated. The regression coefficients showed the
relationship between each vulnerability index and the nitrate concentration. The
regression coefficient of DRASTIC model indicated a correlation of 0.37. The
combination of Wilcoxon non-parametric test for rates and the sensitivity analysis for
weights revealed the highest correlation of 0.87 among all applied hybrid models
The most appropriate groundwater vulnerability map with the highest validity and
accuracy was selected and combined with the nitrate pollution map that indicates the
amount of damage in the Kerman Plain. Then, Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) was
applied to develop a new methodology for assessing pollution risk. DST method
provides a major advantage by dealing with the varying levels of precision related to
information and the more generalized form of probability theory. The combination of
the damage map and the pollution occurrence probability map through DST method
produces a novel method that can determine the groundwater risk map for the nitrate
parameter.
The application of risk assessment method is recommended if the objective is to
develop a risk map of areas that are vulnerable to pollution. Aside from nitrate, other
pollutants can also be identified in other regions. Therefore, analyses are urged to
search for other factors that lead to the pollution of groundwater resources.
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
vi
Abstrak thesis yang dikemukakan kepada Senat Universiti Putra Malaysia sebagai
memenuhi keperluan untuk ijazah Doktor Falsafah
PENILAIAN DAN AIR BAWAH TANAH KELEMAHAN NITRAT RISIKO
PENCEMARAN MENGGUNAKAN GIS BERASASKAN MODEL HIBRID
DRASTIK DENGAN TEKNIK STATISTIK DAN KEBARANGKALIAN
Oleh
AMINREZA NESHAT
Ogos 2014
Pengerusi: Prof. Madya. Biswajeet Pradhan, PhD
Fakulti: Kejuruteraan
Salah satu daripada kerosakan yang paling signifikasn terhadap alam sekitar pada masa
kini adalah pencemaran air bawah tanah yang disebabkan oleh aktiviti manusia
terutamanya aktiviti pertanian. Aktiviti pertanian telah dimajukan dari kaedah
tradisional hingga ke kaedah moden; baja kimia yang berlebihan juga mengakibatkan
peningkatan jumlah bahan pencemar. Malah, sesetengah baja yang mempunyai ciri-
ciri yang unik seperti nitrat mengakibatkan pencemaran air dan tanah. Kebanyakan
baja-baja ini memasuki air bawah tanah melalui air yang berlebihan dan ini
mewujudkan risiko terhadap sumber air bawah tanah. Oleh itu, mengenal pasti dan
diagnosis terhadap jumlah bahan pencemar yang terdapat di dalam air bawah tanah
dengan peta tanah yang menunjukkan risiko boleh mengurangkan pencemaran sumber
air bawah tanah. Oleh itu, program-program pencegahan yang cekap seperti
pengurusan risiko perlu dilaksanakan untuk menandingi pencemaran air bawah tanah.
Dalam kajian ini, pendekatan DRASTIC yang berdasarkan sistem maklumat geografi
(GIS) telah digunakan untuk menilai kelemahan air bawah tanah di dataran Kerman
(Iran), yang merupakan sebuah kawasan gersang dan separa gersang yang menghadapi
pencemaran air bawah tanah yang disebabkan aktiviti pertanian yang secara intensif
serta pengeksploitasi tanah yang berlebihan. Model DRASTIC dijalankan di dataran
Kerman merangkumi tujuh parameter iaitu kedalaman air (D), aliran masuk bersih (R),
media akuifer (A), media tanah (S), topografi (T), kesan zon vadose (I) dan
konduktiviti hidraulik (C). Model DRASTIC asal telah digunakan dan bersepadu
dengan menggunakan kadar dan pem berat asal. Peta kelemahan generasi air bawah
tanah juga dilakukan dengan mengoptimumkan kadar dan berat model DRASTIC
dengan menggunakan teknik-teknik pemodelan GIS. Model-model yang digunakan
ialah Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Single Parameter Sensitivity Analysis
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
vii
(SPSA), Frequency Ratio (FR) and Wilcoxon non-parametric model. Kadar optimum
dan pem berat telah dikira dengan menggunakan setiap model masing-masing.
Wilcoxon bukan parametrik dan kekerapan nisbah telah digunakan untuk
mengoptimumkan kadar model DRASTIC. Kaedah AHP juga digunakan untuk
mengoptimumkan kadar dan pem berat model DRASTIC. Analisis sensitiviti
digunakan untuk mengoptimumkan hanya pem berat model DRASTIC. kaedah telah
ditugaskan kepada model DRASTIC dan disepadukan untuk menghasilkan kaedah-
kaedah hibrid. Sesetengah kaedah-kaedah hibrid yang digenerasikan dengan
menggunakan model-model yang ternyata di atas masih belum diaplikasikan oleh
kajian-kajian yang lain setakat ini.
Seterusnya, pengoptimuman yang paling baik terhadap peta kelemahan tanah
ditentukan dengan menggunakan Pearson’s coefficient correlation. Setiap nilai
korelasi Pearson dari model DRASTIC yang telah diubahsuai dalam kajian ini telah
dikira. Pekali regresi menunjukkan hubungan antara setiap indeks kelemahan dan
kepekatan nitrat. Pekali regresi model DRASTIC menunjukkan korelasi 0.37 dan
gabungan Wilcoxon bukan parametrik untuk kadar dan analisis kepekaan terhadap
berat menunjukkan korelasi yang paling tinggi iaitu 0.87 di kalangan semua model
hibrid yang digunakan.
Akhir sekali, peta kelemahan air bawah tanah yang paling sesuai dengan kesahan dan
ketepatan yang paling tinggi telah dipilih dan digabungkan dengan peta pencemaran
nitrat untuk menunjukkan jumlah kerosakan di dataran Kerman. Kemudian, teori
Dempster-Shafer (DST) telah digunakan untuk membangunkan satu kaedah yang baru
untuk menilai risiko pencemaran. Kaedah DST dapat berurusan dengan pelbagai
peringkat ketepatan yang berkaitan dengan maklumat serta bentuk teori
kebarangkalian yang lebih umum. Gabungan peta kerosakan dan peta kebarangkalian
kejadian pencemaran dengan kaedah DST menghasilkan kaedah novel yang boleh
menentukan peta risiko air bawah tanah bagi parameter nitrat.
Aplikasi kaedah penilaian risiko adalah disyorkan jika objektif kajian adalah untuk
membangunkan peta berisiko di kawasan-kawasan yang terdedah kepada pencemaran.
Tambahan pula, bahan pencemar yang lain juga boleh dikenal pasti di kawasan-
kawasan lain selain daripada nitrat. Oleh itu, penganalisis digesa supaya mencari
faktor-faktor lain yang membawa pencemaran kepada sumber air bawah tanah.
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH
Praise and thanks are due to Allah who gave me strength and determination to
complete my study. This study would never have materialized without the contribution
of many individuals and organizations to whom I have the pleasure of expressing my
appreciation and gratitude.
I gratefully acknowledge my gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Dr Biswajeet Pradhan
and thank him for his inspiring guidance and valuable support especially during the
last year of the research period. I appreciate him for his critical reading and comments
on the drafts of different chapters and the adjusting his schedule. His never-ending
support, excellent guidance and outstanding advice accompanied me through the
whole period of my Ph.D. I heartedly appreciate his professional view on research
issues, critical comments, intellectual opinion, and the way he put them in simple and
straightforward argument and suggestion. Unfortunately, words fall short when I try
to reciprocate honestly to all that he has done for me. I respectfully acknowledge the
scientific and moral support received from you and the most importantly for being a
great teacher, friend and guide for me. Thanks are also extended to my committee
members who honored me by accepting to be in my supervising committee Dr. Helmi
Zulhaidi Mohd Shafri, Dr Ahmad Rodzi Bin Mahmud and Prof. Dr. Mohammad
Rahnama.
I am also gratefully indebted to Visiting Professor of University of Victoria (Canada)
Prof. Dr. Mohammad Rahnama for his invaluable contribution, support, guidance and
encouragement through the duration of my research, but I would especially like to
thank him for being such a great friend.
My special thanks go to my previous supervisor Dr. Saied Pirasteh for supporting and
encouraging me during supervising my work. My appreciation will be incomplete
without mentioning the other Geospatial Information Science Research Center
(GISRC) members Prof. Dr. Shattri Bin Mansor and Dr. Rashid Shariff during my PhD
degree.
I am also grateful to my dear friends, especially Haleh Nampak, Mohesen Dadras and
Dr Saman Javadi for their support and inspiration in times of need.
My family has always been there for me spiritually, emotionally, psychologically, and
financially when needed. Nothing can really express my feelings and gratitude towards
my lovely parent for the values they have given me. They have taught me to never be
afraid of the truth and openly express my thoughts and feelings.
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
ix
There are no proper words to convey my deepest gratitude and respect for my father.
I will never forget how difficult it was for him to accept my decision to leave Iran for
continuing education but he never complained. He always advise and guide me for
having better life.
A special note of thanks and a profound gratitude to my brother and sisters who
tolerated my absence for a long time. They have been a constant source of sacrifice,
encouragement, prayer, good wishes and support throughout my life. My eldest brother
Alireza who is my heroic figure when I was weak and vulnerable. Also, I had many
difficulty during data collection for my research work and my brother was the one who
made it easier for me by his constant support. Many thanks go to my lovely sisters
Mandana and Parisa who never let me feel alone. They are the people who always
accompanied me through the whole of my life.
Last but certainly not least, to my lovely mother who is not here with us to see the
completion of my dissertation. But I am sure she is somewhere out there always
watching me closely.
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
x
I certify that a Thesis Examination Committee has met on (28 August 2014) to conduct
the final examination of Aminreza Neshat on his thesis entitled " ASSESSMENT OF
GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY AND NITRATE CONTAMINATION RISK
USING GIS-BASED DRASTIC MODEL WITH HYBRID STATISTICAL AND
PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUES " in accordance with the Universities and
University Colleges Act 1971 and the Constitution of the Universiti Putra Malaysia
[P.U.(A) 106] 15 March 1998. The Committee recommends that the student be
awarded the Doctor of Philosophy.
Members of the Thesis Examination Committee were as follows:
Abdul Rahman Ramli, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Chairman)
Shattri b Mansor, PhD
Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Internal Examiner)
Mohd Amin b Mohd Soom, PhD
Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Internal Examiner)
Shiuan Wan, PhD
Professor
Ling Tung University
Taiwan
(External Examiner)
NORITAH OMAR, PhD
Associate Professor and Deputy Dean
School of Graduate Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Date: 19 September 2014
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
xi
This thesis submitted to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia has been accepted as
fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The members of the
Supervisory Committee are as follows:
Biswajeet Pradhan, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Chairman)
Helmi Z.M. Shafri, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Member)
Ahmad Rodzi Bin Mahmud, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Member)
Mohammad Rahnama, PhD
Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Shahid-Bahonar University of Kerman
(Member)
BUJANG BIN KIM HUAT, PhD
Professor and Dean
School of Graduate Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Date:
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
xii
Declaration by graduate student
I hereby confirm that:
this thesis is my original work; quotations, illustrations and citations have been duly referenced; this thesis has not been submitted previously or concurrently for any other
degree at any other institutions;
intellectual property from the thesis and copyright of thesis are fully-owned by Universiti Putra Malaysia, as according to the Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Research) Rules 2012;
written permission must be obtained from supervisor and the office of Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Innovation) before thesis is published (in the
form of written, printed or in electronic form) including books, journals,
modules, proceedings, popular writings, seminar papers, manuscripts,
posters, reports, lecture notes, learning modules or any other materials as
stated in the Universiti Putra Malaysia (Research) Rules 2012;
there is no plagiarism or data falsification/fabrication in the thesis, and scholarly integrity is upheld as according to the Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Graduate Studies) Rules 2003 (Revision 2012-2013) and the Universiti Putra
Malaysia (Research) Rules 2012. The thesis has undergone plagiarism
detection software.
Signature: _______________________ Date: __________________
Name and Matric No.: _________________________________________
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
xiii
Declaration by Members of Supervisory Committee
This is to confirm that:
the research conducted and the writing of this thesis was under our supervision; supervision responsibilities as stated in the Universiti Putra Malaysia (Graduate
Studies) Rules 2003 (Revision 2012-2013) are adhered to.
Signature: __________________
Name of
Chairman of
Supervisory
Committee: __________________
Signature: __________________
Name of
Member of
Supervisory
Committee: __________________
Signature: __________________
Name of
Member of
Supervisory
Committee: __________________
Signature: __________________
Name of
Member of
Supervisory
Committee: __________________
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
xiv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT iv
ABSTRAK vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii
APPROVAL x
DECLARATION xii
LIST OF TABLES xviii
LIST OF FIGURES xix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xxiii
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Problem statement 3
1.3 Objectives 4
1.4 Research questions 5
1.5 Hypothesis 6
1.6 Scope of the study 6
1.7 Significant contribution to new knowledge 6
1.8 Thesis organization 7
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introduction 9
2.2 Definition 10
2.2.1 Groundwater 10
2.2.2 Groundwater vulnerability to pollution 11
2.2.3 Geographic Information System (GIS) 13
2.2.4 Nitrate 13
2.2.5 Interpolation 14
2.2.6 Uncertainty 14
2.2.7 Risk assessment 14
2.3 The role of groundwater in arid and semi-arid 15
2.4 GIS approaches to groundwater vulnerability evaluation 15
2.4.1 Index and Overlay Methods 17
2.4.1.1 DRASTIC model 18
2.4.2 Multi Criteria Decision Method 20
2.4.2.1 Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) 21
2.4.3 Statistical Methods 22
2.4.3.1 Wilcoxon rank-sum nonparametric
statistical tests 23
2.4.3.2 Sensitivity Analysis Model 24
2.4.3.3 Frequency Ratio Model 25
2.5 Hybrid methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment 25
2.6 Previous works of using GIS for
groundwater vulnerability assessment 27
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
xv
2.7 Validation of groundwater vulnerability 31
2.8 Groundwater pollution and risk analysis 32
2.8.1 Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) 33
2.8.2 Ordinary Kriging 34
2.9 Risk Assessment 35
2.10 Previous works of using risk assessment method
for groundwater pollution 36
2.11 Summary 40
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction 43
3.2 Description of the study area 43
3.2.1 Study area 43
3.2.2 Geology and hydrology of study area 43
3.2.2.1 General geology 44
3.2.2.2 Stratigraphy of the plain situation 45
3.2.2.3 Tectonic 48
3.3.3 Hydrogeology 48
3.3 Data Sources 48
3.3.1 Spatial data 49
3.3.2 Attribute data 49
3.3.3 Data used 49
3.3.4 Preparing the seven hydrological factors
and surveying nitrate samples 49
3.4 Methodology 63
3.4.1 Methodology overview 63
3.4.2 DRASTIC model 66
3.4.3 Wilcoxon rank sum nonparametric statistical tests 69
3.4.4 Single Parameter Sensitivity Analysis (SPSA) 69
3.4.5 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) 70
3.4.6 Ordinary Kriging (OK) 72
3.4.7 Frequency Ratio (FR) 73
3.5 Hybrid methods 75
3.5.1 Integration of Wilcoxon and DRASTIC model 75
3.5.2 Integration of Wilcoxon and SPSA method 76
3.5.3 Integration of AHP method,
Wilcoxon method and DRASTIC model 77
3.5.3.1 Optimizing the rates and weights of the
DRASTIC model using AHP 78
3.5.3.2 Optimizing of the DRASTIC model
using Wilcoxon and AHP 78
3.5.4 Revision of the rates of DRASTIC
using frequency ratio model 79
3.5.4.1 Integration of frequency ratio approach
with SPSA, AHP and DRASTIC model 80
3.6 Validation and selection of a suitable method
in the study area 82
3.6.1 Pearson correlation coefficient 82
3.7 Risk assessment method 83
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
xvi
3.7.1 Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) 85
3.7.1.2 Data combination using DST 88
3.8 Summary 90
4 GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
4.1 Introduction 92
4.2 Hydrogeological layers of DRASTIC model 93
4.2.1 Groundwater vulnerability map using
original DRASTIC model 94
4.3 Hybrid methods 97
4.3.1 Modified groundwater vulnerability map
using Wilcoxon method 97
4.3.2 Modified groundwater vulnerability map
using Wilcoxon and SPSA methods 102
4.3.3 Modified groundwater vulnerability map using
AHP method with Wilcoxon method and DRASTIC model 104
4.3.3.1 Integration of AHP method and
DRASTIC model 107
4.3.3.2 Integration of Modified DRASTIC method
and AHP model 110
4.3.3.3 Integration of DRASTIC and AHP model 112
4.3.3.4 Integration of AHP rates and weights 113
4.3.4 Modified groundwater vulnerability map using
FR method with DRASTIC, SPSA and AHP method115
4.3.4.1 Integration of FR and DRASTIC model 120
4.3.4.2 Integration of FR and SPSA model 121
4.3.4.3 Integration of FR and AHP model 124
4.3.5 Comparison and validation of vulnerability maps
derived from different methods 126
4.4 Summary 128
5 RISK ASSESSMENT 5.1 Introduction 131
5.2 Basics for uncertainty and probability 131
5.3 Risk analysis 131
5.3.1 Groundwater vulnerability mapping 133
5.3.2 Damage map 134
5.3.3 Applying DST to groundwater pollution
risk assessment 136
5.3.4 Risk mapping 147
5.4 Summary 149
6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
6.1 Main conclusions 151
6.2 Recommendation 155
© CO
PYRI
GHT U
PM
xvii
6.3 Future research 155
REFERENCES 156
APPENDICES 176
BIODATA OF THE STUDENT 195
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 196
ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY AND NITRATE CONTAMINATION RISK USING GIS-BASED DRASTIC MODEL WITH HYBRID STATISTICAL AND PROBABILISTIC TECHNIQUESABSTRACTTABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTERSREFEERENCES