25
New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source: http://www.nsinc.org/what-we-treat.php

New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

New Modalities in Diabetes DiagnosisPresented By:

Kristin J. Brown, MSIVDr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine

July 2011

Image source: http://www.nsinc.org/what-we-treat.php

Page 2: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Who Should Be Tested?According to the ADA1:• Overweight/obese adults

• BMI >25• Who have one or more

additional risk factors

• At age 45 years• Repeat testing every 3 yrs• If pre-diabetic, test every

year.

Page 3: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Methods of Diagnosis Source: ADA’s “Standards of Medical Care”1

Page 4: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

HbA1c vs. FPG & OGTT1

≥6.5 diagnose DM Disadvantages

Higher in cost Limited availability

for testing. Can be altered in

patients with anemia and hemoglobinopathies.

Benefits Fasting not required Greater pre-analytical

stability than FPG Less vulnerable to

alterations than FPG during stress & illness.

Page 5: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

FPG1

Studies have shown the FPG test has a specificity exceeding 96%, but it is only 50% sensitive.2

Page 6: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

FPG & OGTT1

OGTT has been shown to have a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 80%.2

Both FPG and OGTT are invasive, fasting exams that suffer from poor reproducibility.2

Page 7: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

www.ngsp.org3

Click icon to add picture

HbA1c Assay Interferences

“If your diabetes patient has a hemoglobin variant, your lab should use one of the methods that does not show interference from the variant, thus producing an accurate A1C result.”

Page 8: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Complications Diabetes complications1,4:

CVD** PVD Nephropathy Retinopathy Neuropathy

Peripheral and autonomic Hearing loss Stroke HTN

Image source: http://www.netheryeye.com/OurServices/DiabeticRetinopathy.aspx

Page 9: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Neuropathy1,4

One of the most common late complications of DM.

Leading cause of non-traumatic amputations in the US.

Has a role in other late complications of diabetes. Neuropathic ulcerations!

Increases risk of mortality.

Page 10: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Neuropathy Etiology

AGE’s (Advanced Glycation End products)5

Increased in hyperglycemia & oxidative stress Sugars cross-link with other proteins Contribute to segmental demyelination and

interact with nitric oxideneronal apoptosis.

Excess sugars and proteins broken down by the Maillard reaction5: Creates AGE’s

Image source: http://www.artistaday.com/?p=5717/

Page 11: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

AGE’s Increased in skin collagen in those with

neuropathy.5

Especially pentosidine and cross-lines These when excited with near-

UV and blue light.fluoresce

Image source: http://thegist.dermagist.com/how-to-increase-collagen-and-elastin-production

Page 12: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

AGE’s First screened via punch biopsy that

often times required a suture for closure.2

Now studies using near infrared (NIR) technologies.2

Non-invasive Portable & immediate results Readings corrected for intrinsic

fluorescence parameters. (dark vs. light skin, etc.)Image source: http://www.punchbiopsycpt.com/what-is-a-punch-biopsy

Page 13: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Studies M.N. Ediger, B. Olson, and J Maynard.

“Noninvasive Optical Screening for Diabetes.” Journal of Diabetes Science & Technology. 2009;3(4):776-780.6

Retrospective cohort of 2,793 subjects All identified as naïve & at risk based on the

ADA’s Standard of Care Guidelines. Compared FPG, HbA1c, and OGTT to SIF.

OGTT at 2hr 75g was considered the baseline. Results

Page 14: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Studies J.D. Maynard et al. “Noninvasive Type 2

Diabetes Screening”. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1120-1124.7

351 subjects with one or more DM risk factors. Ages 21-86 years Compared HbA1c, FGT, SIF vs. OGTT 84 pts had AGT (OGTT >140 mg/dL) Results

Page 15: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Studies B.N. Conway et al. “Skin Intrinsic

Fluorescence Correlates with Autonomic and Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes.” Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1000-1005.5

111 people with DM1 Mean age 49 years Determined if CDSP and autonomic neuropathy

associated with SIF vs. HbA1c. Results

Page 16: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Scout DS by VeraLight8

Image source: http://www.veralight.com/SCOUT_Video.html

Page 17: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Scout DS by VeraLight8

Image source: http://www.veralight.com/SCOUT_Video.html

Page 18: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Scout DS by VeraLight8

≥50 =diabetic<50 =normal

Image source: http://www.veralight.com/SCOUT_Video.html

Page 19: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Corneal Confocal Microscopy

“A rapid, non-invasive technique that enables a prospective and reiterative evaluation of the human cornea at high magnification [1-2 µm resolution].”9

Utilizes confocal optics, which allows examination of a focused point.9

Coronal sections of the cornea. Can visualize corneal epithelium, Bowman’s membrane

(nerve-complex), stroma, and endothelium. Even better than histopathological exams!9

Fun fact: The cornea is the most densely innervated part of the human body!9

Page 20: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Corneal Confocal Microscopy Cont… The cornea contains C and Aδ fibers.9

Reminder: C fibers are large, unmyelinated fibers responsible for slow, aching pain. Aδ cause fast, sharp pain.

Those fibers account for the majority of symptoms in diabetic neuropathy, and have been shown to be damaged first.9

Page 21: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Study M. Tavakoli, et al. “Corneal Confocal

Microscopy: A novel noninvasive test to diagnose and stratify the severity of human diabetic neuropathy.” Diabetes Care. 2010;33(8):1792-1797.10

110 DM and 17 healthy pts. Assessed on NDS, QST, NCV (sural &

peroneal), NCCA, CCM. Results

Page 22: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Image source: M. Tavakoli, et al. “Corneal Confocal Microscopy: A novel noninvasive test to diagnose and stratify the severity of human diabetic neuropathy.” Diabetes Care. 2010;33(8):1792-1797.O5

normal

moderate

mild

severe

Page 23: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Conclusion Skin Intrinsic Fluorescence and Corneal Confocal

Microscopy are two technologies at the forefront of diabetic and diabetic neuropathy diagnosis.

They are non-invasive techniques that give immediate results, and have been shown by multiple studies to be superior to other techniques.

While they aren’t seen widely now, you will probably see them soon…

Page 24: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

Image source: http://www.nsinc.org/what-we-treat.php

Thank you.Questions?

Page 25: New Modalities in Diabetes Diagnosis Presented By: Kristin J. Brown, MSIV Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine July 2011 Image source:

References1. American Diabetes Association. “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2010.” Diabetes

Care. 2010:33(supplement 1):511-561.2. Hull, E., et al. “Noninvasive, optical detection of diabetes: model studies with porcine skin.”

Optics Express. 2004;12(19):4496-4509.3. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. “Harmonizing Hemoglobin A1C Testing.” Accessed

online July 12th, 2011. http://www.ngsp.org/bground.asp4. American Diabetes Association website. “Living with Diabetes: Complications.” Accessed

online July 10, 2011. http://www.diabetes.org/living-with-diabetes/complications/5. Conway, B.N. et al. “Skin Intrinsic Fluorescence Correlates with Autonomic and Distal

Symmetrical Polyneuropathy in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes.” Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1000-1005.

6. Ediger, M.N., B. Olson, and J Maynard. “Noninvasive Optical Screening for Diabetes.” Journal of Diabetes Science & Technology. 2009;3(4):776-780.

7. Maynard, J.D. et al. “Noninvasive Type 2 Diabetes Screening”. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1120-1124.

8. VeraLight Website. “The VeraLight Scout DS.” Accessed online July 10th, 2011. http://www.veralight.com/products.html

9. Hossain, P., A. Sachdev, and R. Malik. “Early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with corneal confocal microscopy.” The Lancet. 2005;366:1340-1342.

10. Tavakoli, M. et al. “Corneal Confocal Microscopy: A novel and noninvasive test to diagnose and stratify the severity of human diabetic neuropathy.” Diabetes Care. 2010;33(8):1792-1797.

11. Malik, R.A. et al. “Corneal Confocal Microscopy: a non-invasive surrogate of nerve fibre damage and repair in diabetic patients.” Diabetologia. 2003;46:683-688.