9
New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine 100 Units∙mL2 -1 Featured Article: Reinhard H.A. Becker, Raphael Dahmen, Karin Bergmann, Anne Lehmann, Thomas Jax, and Tim Heise Diabetes Care Volume 38: 637-64 3 April, 2015

New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2-1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged

Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine 100 Units∙mL2-1

Featured Article:

Reinhard H.A. Becker, Raphael Dahmen, Karin Bergmann, Anne Lehmann, Thomas Jax, and Tim Heise

Diabetes Care Volume 38: 637-643

April, 2015

Page 2: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

STUDY OBJECTIVE 

• To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a new insulin glargine comprising 300 units∙mL–1 (Gla-300), compared with insulin glargine 100 units ∙ mL–1 (Gla-100) at steady state in people with type 1 diabetes

Becker R.H.A. et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-643

Page 3: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

• Randomized, double-blind, crossover study applied the euglycemic clamp technique over 36 h

• Participants received once-daily subcutaneous administrations of either 0.4 (cohort 1) or 0.6 units∙kg–1 (cohort 2) Gla-300 for 8 days in one treatment period and 0.4 units∙kg–1 Gla-100 for 8 days in the other

• PK and PD assessments performed on the last treatment day included serum insulin measurements over 36 h

Becker R.H.A. et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-643

Page 4: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

RESULTS

• At steady state, insulin concentration and glucose infusion rate profiles of Gla-300 were more constant and more evenly distributed over 24 h than those of Gla-100 and lasted longer

• Tight blood glucose control was maintained for approximately 5 h longer with Gla-300

Becker R.H.A. et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-643

Page 5: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

Becker R.H.A. et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-643

Page 6: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

Becker R.H.A. et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-643

Page 7: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

Becker R.H.A. et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-643

Page 8: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

CONCLUSIONS

• Gla-300 provides more even steady-state PK and PD profiles and a longer duration of action than Gla-100

• Blood glucose control is extended well beyond 24 h

Becker R.H.A. et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-643

Page 9: New Insulin Glargine 300 Units∙mL2 -1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine

Becker R.H.A. et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-643