38
New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders James M. Fisher Julius P. Van de Pas Author J ames M. Fisher is vice presi- dent of Computerized Structural Design (CSD), a Milwaukee, Wisconsin consulting engineering firm. Dr. Fisher received a bachelor of science degree in civil engineering from the University of Wisconsin in 1962. After serving two years as a Lieutenant in the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Dr. Fisher continued his formal edu- cation. He received his master of science and Ph.D. degree in structural engineering from the University of Illinois in 1965 and 1968 respectively. Prior to joining CSD, Dr. Fisher was an assistant professor of structural engineering at the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee. He is a registered structural engineer in several states. Dr. Fisher has specialized in structural steel research and development. He has spent a large part of his career investigat- ing building systems and the study of economical structural framing systems. He was a for- mer chairman of the American Society of Civil Engineers Committee on the Design of Steel Building Structures. Dr. Fisher is a member of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) Committee on Specifications, and a member of the AISC Specification Committee for the Design Fabrication and Erection of Structural Steel Buildings. Dr. Fisher is the co-author of seven books, as-well-as the author of many technical publica- tions in the field of structural engi- neering. He is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and honorary fraterni- ties Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Chi Epsilon and Phi Kappa Phi. Dr. Fisher received the 1984 T.R. Higgins Lecturship Award presented by the American Institute of Steel Construction. Author J ulius P. Van de Pas is a princi- pal at Computerized Structural Design and manages the firm's Colorado office. Mr. Van de Pas has been employed at CSD since 1988. During his tenure at CSD, he has been responsible for the structural design of numerous industrial, commercial and institu- tional buildings. Mr. Van de Pas received a bachelor of science degree in civil engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Platteville in 1984 and a master of science degree in civil engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in 1991. He is Licensed as a Professional engineer in Wisconsin, Michigan, California and Colorado. In addition, Mr. Van de Pas has served as an adjunct assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He has also co-authored a publication on steel joist construction. Summary T his paper will discuss the design of crane buildings rela- tive to fatigue requirements. Emphasis is placed on the design and detailing requirements to avoid failures due to fatigue. Typical girder configurations, details, and problem areas will be discussed, including lessons that have been learned from previous fatigue related failures. Examples are provided to illustrate how the designer can apply the new 1999 AISC Fatigue Requirements to design for the anticipated service requirements. 13-1 © 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

New FatigueProvisions forthe Design of

Crane RunwayGirders

James M. Fisher

Julius P. Van de Pas

Author

James M. Fisher is vice presi-dent of Computerized

Structural Design (CSD), aMilwaukee, Wisconsin consultingengineering firm. Dr. Fisherreceived a bachelor of sciencedegree in civil engineering fromthe University of Wisconsin in1962. After serving two years asa Lieutenant in the United StatesArmy Corps of Engineers, Dr.Fisher continued his formal edu-cation. He received his master ofscience and Ph.D. degree instructural engineering from theUniversity of Illinois in 1965 and1968 respectively. Prior to joiningCSD, Dr. Fisher was an assistantprofessor of structural engineeringat the University of Wisconsin atMilwaukee. He is a registeredstructural engineer in severalstates.

Dr. Fisher has specialized instructural steel research anddevelopment. He has spent alarge part of his career investigat-ing building systems and thestudy of economical structuralframing systems. He was a for-mer chairman of the AmericanSociety of Civil EngineersCommittee on the Design of SteelBuilding Structures.

Dr. Fisher is a member of theAmerican Iron and Steel Institute(AISI) Committee onSpecifications, and a member ofthe AISC Specification Committeefor the Design Fabrication andErection of Structural SteelBuildings.

Dr. Fisher is the co-author ofseven books, as-well-as theauthor of many technical publica-tions in the field of structural engi-neering.

He is a member of theAmerican Society of CivilEngineers and honorary fraterni-ties Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, ChiEpsilon and Phi Kappa Phi.

Dr. Fisher received the 1984T.R. Higgins Lecturship Awardpresented by the AmericanInstitute of Steel Construction.

Author

Julius P. Van de Pas is a princi-pal at Computerized Structural

Design and manages the firm'sColorado office. Mr. Van de Pashas been employed at CSD since1988. During his tenure at CSD,he has been responsible for thestructural design of numerousindustrial, commercial and institu-tional buildings.

Mr. Van de Pas received abachelor of science degree in civilengineering from the University ofWisconsin-Platteville in 1984 anda master of science degree in civilengineering from the University ofWisconsin-Milwaukee in 1991.He is Licensed as a Professionalengineer in Wisconsin, Michigan,California and Colorado.

In addition, Mr. Van de Pas hasserved as an adjunct assistantprofessor at the University ofWisconsin-Milwaukee. He hasalso co-authored a publication onsteel joist construction.

Summary

This paper will discuss thedesign of crane buildings rela-

tive to fatigue requirements.Emphasis is placed on the designand detailing requirements toavoid failures due to fatigue.Typical girder configurations,details, and problem areas will bediscussed, including lessons thathave been learned from previousfatigue related failures. Examplesare provided to illustrate how thedesigner can apply the new 1999AISC Fatigue Requirements todesign for the anticipated servicerequirements.

13-1

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 2: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

NEW FATIGUE PROVISIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF CRANE RUNWAY GIRDERS

James M. Fisher, Ph.D., P.E.Julius P. Van de Pas, P.E.

INTRODUCTION

Proper functioning of the bridge cranes is dependent upon proper crane runway girder design and

detailing. The runway design must account for the fatigue effects caused by the repeated passing of the

crane. Runway girders should be thought of as a part of a system comprised of the crane rails, rail

attachments, electrification support, crane stop, crane column attachment, tie back and the girder itself.

All of these items should be incorporated into the design and detailing of the crane runway girder system.

It has been estimated that 90 percent of crane runway girder problems are associated with fatigue

cracking. To address these conditions, this paper will discuss the new AISC fatigue provisions, crane

loads, typical connections and typical details. A design example is also provided.

Engineers have designed crane runway girders that have performed with minimal problems while being

subjected to millions of cycles of loading. The girders that are performing successfully have been

properly designed and detailed to:

• Limit the applied stress range to acceptable levels.

• Avoid unexpected restraints at the attachments and supports

• Avoid stress concentrations at critical locations

• Avoid eccentricities due to rail misalignment or crane travel

• Minimize residual stresses

Even when all state of the art design provisions are followed building owners can expect to perform

periodic maintenance on runway systems. Runway systems that have performed well have been properly

maintained by keeping the rails and girders aligned and level. Some fatigue damage will occur even in

"perfectly designed" structures since fabrication and erection cannot be perfect. Fatigue provisions by

their very nature have a 95 percent reliability factor for a given stress range, and expected life condition.

Thus, for a given "correct" design a 5 percent failure rate can occur.

13-3

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 3: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

FATIGUE DAMAGE

Fatigue damage can be characterized as progressive crack growth due to fluctuating stress on the member.

Fatigue cracks initiate at small defects or imperfections in the base material or weld metal. The

imperfections act as stress risers that magnify the applied elastic stresses into small regions of the plastic

stress. As load cycles are applied, the plastic strain in the small plastic region advances until the material

separates and the crack advances. At that point, the plastic stress region moves to the new tip of the crack

and the process repeats itself. Eventually, the crack size becomes large enough that the combined effect

of the crack size and the applied stress exceed the toughness of the material and a final fracture occurs.

The phenomena of fatigue damage or crack growth is considered to occur in three stages. These are

initiation, propagation and final fracture. The crack initiation is affected by the initial flaw size, the

amount of residual stress, the presence of corrosion and the applied stress range. Most of the fatigue life

of an unwelded or unnotched member is taken up in the initiation of the crack. Fabricated members

typically will have small defects from the welding process that can be considered as initiated cracks. In

this case, the entire useful life of the section is taken up in crack propagation. The useful life of the

elements is usually met when the crack reaches an objectionable size.

Crack propagation occurs when the applied loads fluctuate in tension or in reversal from tension to

compression. Fluctuating compressive stress will not cause cracks to propagate. However, fluctuating

compressive stresses in a region of residual tensile stress will cause cracks to propagate. In this case, the

cracks will stop growing after the residual stress is released or the crack extends out of the tensile region.

THE 1999 AISC FATIGUE PROVISIONS

The 1999 AISC LRFD Specification contains revised fatigue provisions. Both the 1993 (current) and

1999 AISC Specifications are based on S-N curves that define allowable stress range values for given

detail, categories, and loading conditions. These relationships were established based on an extensive

database developed in the United States and abroad. The database for the provisions was based on cyclic

testing of actual joints, thus stress concentrations were accounted for in each of the detail stress

categories. Calculated stresses were determined by ordinary analysis at service loads and were not

amplified by stress concentration factors since the factors already existed in the tested real conditions.

The 1993 provisions define Loading Conditions based on the number of cycles expected in the life of the

structure. The loading conditions are defined as 20,000 to 100,000 cycles, 100,000 to 500,000 cycles,

500,000 to 2,000,000 cycles or more than 2,000,000 cycles (Table A-K3.1). Stress Category

13-4

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 4: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

Classifications are defined based on the configuration of the given conditions and the associated stress

concentrations (Table A-K3.2). The Design Stress Range is determined based on the Loading Condition

and the Stress Category Classification.

The 1996 provisions provide a more accurate method of determining the Design Stress Range. The 1996

provisions use a single table that is divided into sections which described various conditions. The

sections are:

1. Plain material away from any welding.

2. Connected material in mechanically fastened joints.

3. Welded joints joining components of built-up members.

4. Longitudinal fillet welded end conditions.

5. Welded joints transverse to direction of stress.

6. Base metal at welded transverse member connections.

7. Base metal at short attachments.

8. Miscellaneous.

The 1999 AISC provisions use equations to calculate the design stress range for a chosen design life, N,

for various conditions and stress categories. For the first time, the point of potential crack initiation is

identified by description, and shown in the table figures. The tables also provide the detail constant,

applicable to the stress category that is required for calculating the design stress range For example,

for the majority of stress categories

where:

Constant from Table A-K3.1

Number of stress range fluctuations in design life,

Number of stress range fluctuations per day x 365 x years of design life

Threshold fatigue stress range, maximum stress range for indefinite design life

The tables contain the threshold design stress for each stress category. A copy of the new fatigue

provisions are provided in the Appendix of this paper.

13-5

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 5: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

The 1993 and the 1999 AISC Specifications limit the allowable stress range for a given service life based

on an anticipated severity of the stress riser for a given fabricated condition. In addition to limiting the

applied stress range, the AISC Specification for certain cases requires conformance with Chapter 9 of the

AWS D1.1 Structural Welding Code. Chapter 9 of the ANSI/AWS JD1.1 Structural Welding Code titled

Dynamically Loaded Structures provides criteria for limiting the severity of stress risers found in weld

metal and the adjacent base metal.

CRANE RUNWAY LOADS

Each runway is designed to support a specific crane or group of cranes. The weight of the crane bridge

and trolley and the wheel spacing for the specific crane should be obtained from the crane manufacturer.

The crane weight can vary significantly depending on the manufacturer and the classification of the crane.

Based on the manufacturer's data, forces are determined to account for impact, lateral loads, and

longitudinal loads. The AISC Specification, and most model building codes address crane loads and set

minimum standards for these loads. The AISE Technical Report No. 13 Guide for the Design and

Construction of Mill Buildings also sets minimum requirements for impact, lateral and longitudinal crane

loads. The AISE requirements are used when the engineer and owner determine that the level of quality

set by the AISE Guide is appropriate for a give project.

Vertical crane loads are termed as wheel loads. The magnitude of the wheel load is at its maximum when

the crane is lifting its rated capacity load, and the trolley is located at the end of the bridge directly

adjacent to the girder.

The vertical wheel loads are typically factored by the use of an impact factor. The impact factor accounts

for the effect of acceleration in hoisting the loads and impact caused by the wheels jumping over

irregularities in the rail. Bolted rail splices will tend to cause greater impact when welded rail splices. In

the US, most codes require a twenty-five percent increase in loads for cab and radio operated cranes, and

a ten percent increase for pendant operated cranes.

Lateral crane loads are oriented perpendicular to the crane runway and are applied at the top of the rails.

Lateral loads are caused by:

• Acceleration and deceleration of the trolley and loads• Non vertical lifting• Unbalanced drive mechanisms

13-6

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 6: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

• Oblique or skewed travel of the bridge

The AISC Specification and most model building codes set the magnitude of lateral loads at 20% of the

sum of the weights of the trolley and lifted load. The AISE Technical Report varies the magnitude of the

lateral load based on the function of the crane.

Longitudinal crane forces are due to either acceleration and deceleration of the bridge crane or the crane

impacting the bumper. The tractive forces are limited by the coefficient of friction of the steel wheel on

the rails. The force imparted by impact with hydraulic or spring type bumpers is a function of the length

of stroke of the bumper and the velocity of the crane upon impact with the crane stop. The longitudinal

forces should be obtained from the crane manufacturer. If this information is not available, the AISE

Technical Report provides equations that can be used for determining the bumper force.

Consideration of fatigue requires that the designer determine the anticipated number of load cycles. It is a

common practice for the crane runway girder to be designed for service life that is consistent with the

crane classification. The correlation between the CMAA crane designations and the anticipated number

of load cycles for the life of the structure is not easy since a given crane does not lift its maximum load, or

travel at the same speed, every day or every hour. Shown in Table 1 are estimates of the number of

cycles for CMAA crane classifications A through F over a 40 year period. It must be emphasized that

these are only guidelines and actual duty cycles can only be established from the buildings owner and the

crane manufacturer.

CMAA CraneClassification

ABCDEF

Design Life

20,00050,000100,000500,000

1,500,000>2,000,000

The AISE Guide provides specific load combinations to be used for fatigue calculations.

CRANE RUNWAY FATIGUE DESIGN

Tension Flange Stress

13-7© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.

This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 7: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

When runway girders are fabricated from plate material, fatigue requirements are more severe than for

rolled shape girders. AISC (1996) Appendix K3 Section 3.1 applies to the design of the plate material

and Section 1.1 applies to plain material. Stress Category B is required for plate girders as compared to

stress Category A for rolled shapes.

Web to Flange Welds

The shear in fillet welds which connect the web to the tension and compression flanges is controlled by

Section 8.2, stress Category F. Cracks have been observed in plate girders at the junction of the web to

the compression flange of runway girders when fillet welds are used to connect the web to the

compression flange. The AISE Guide requires that this joint be a full penetration weld with fillet

reinforcement.

Tiebacks

Tiebacks are provided at the end of the crane runway girders to transfer lateral forces from the girder top

flange into the crane column and to laterally restrain the top flange of the crane girder against buckling.

The tiebacks must have adequate strength to transfer the lateral crane loads. However, the tiebacks must

also be flexible enough to allow for longitudinal movement of the top of the girder caused by girder end

rotation. The amount of longitudinal movement due to the end rotation of the girder can be significant.

The end rotation of a 40 foot girder that has undergone a deflection of span over 600 is about .005

radians. For a 36 inch deep girder this results in .2" of horizontal movement at the top flange. The

tieback must also allow for vertical movement due to axial shortening of the crane column. This vertical

movement can be in the range of ¼ inch. In general, the tieback should be attached directly to the top

flange of the girder. Attachment to the web of the girder with a diaphragm plate should be avoided. The

lateral load path for this detail causes bending stresses in the girder web perpendicular to the girder cross

section. The diaphragm plate also tends resist movement due to the axial shortening of the crane column.

Various AISC fatigue provisions are applicable to the loads depending on the exact tieback

configurations.

Bearing Stiffeners

Bearing stiffeners should be provided at the ends of the girders as required by the AISC Specification

Paragraphs K1.3 and K1.4. Fatigue cracks have occurred at the connection between the bearing stiffener

and the girder top flange. The cracks occurred in details where the bearing stiffener was fillet welded to

the underside of the top flange. Passage of each crane wheel produces shear stress in the fillet welds. The

AISC fatigue provisions contain fatigue criteria for fillet welds in shear; however, the determination of

13-8© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.

This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 8: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

the actual stress state in the welds is extremely complex, thus the AISE Guide requires that full

penetration welds be used to connect the top of the bearing stiffeners to the top flange of the girder. The

bottom of the bearing stiffeners may be fitted (preferred) or fillet welded to the bottom flange. All

stiffener to girder webs should be continuous. Horizontal cracks have been observed in the webs of crane

girders with partial height bearing stiffeners. The cracks start between the bearing stiffeners and the top

flange and run longitudinally along the web of the girder. There are many possible causes for the

propagation of these cracks. One possible explanation is that eccentricity in the placement of the rail on

the girder causes distortion of the girder cross section and rotation of the girder cross section.

Intermediate Stiffeners

If intermediate stiffeners are used, the AISE Guide also requires that the intermediate stiffeners be welded

to the top flange with full penetration welds for the same reasons as with bearing stiffeners. Stiffeners

should be stopped short of the tension flange in accordance with the AISC Specification provisions

contained in Chapter G. The AISE Guide also requires continuous stiffener to web welds for intermediate

stiffeners.

Fatigue must be checked where the stiffener terminates adjacent to the tension flange. This condition is

addressed in Section 5.7, Table A-K3.1, of the new AISC Specifications.

Channel Caps and Cap Plates

Channel caps or cap plates are frequently used to provide adequate top flange capacity to transfer lateral

loads to the crane columns and to provide adequate lateral torsional stability of the runway girder cross

section. The common heuristic is that a wide flange reinforced with a cap channel will be economical if it

is 20 pounds a foot lighter than a unreinforced wide flange member. It should be noted that the cap

channel or plate does not fit perfectly with 100% bearing on the top of the wide flange. The tolerances

given in ASTM A6 allow the wide flange member to have some flange tilt along its length, or the plate

may be cupped or slightly warped, or the channel may have some twist along its length. These conditions

will leave small gaps between the top flange of the girder and the top plate or channel. The passage of the

crane wheel over these gaps will tend to distress the channel or plate to top flange welds. Calculation of

the stress condition for these welds is nearly impossible. Because of this phenomena, cap plates or

channels should not be used with Class E or F cranes. For less severe duty cycle cranes, shear flow stress

in the welds can be calculated and limited according to the AISC fatigue provisions in Section 8.2 of the

1999 Specifications. The channel or plate welds to the top flange can be continuous or intermittent.

13-9

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 9: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

However, the AISC design stress range for the base metal is reduced from Category B (Section 3.1) for

continuous welds to Category E (Section 3.4) for intermittent welds.

Crane Column Cap Plates

The crane column cap plate should be detailed so as to not restrain the end rotation of the girder. If the

cap plate girder bolts are placed between the column flanges, the girder end rotation is resisted by a force

couple between the column flange and the bolts. This detail has been known to cause bolt failures.

Preferably, the girder should be bolted to the cap plate outside of the column flanges. The column cap

plate should be extended outside of the column flange with the bolts to the girder placed outside of the

column flanges. The column cap plate should not be made overly thick as this detail requires the cap

plate to distort to allow for the end rotation of the girder. The girder to cap plate bolts should be adequate

to transfer the tractive or bumper forces to the longitudinal crane bracing. The engineer should consider

using slotted holes perpendicular to the runway or oversize holes to allow tolerance for aligning the

girders atop the crane columns.

Laced Crane Girders

A horizontal truss can be used to resist the crane lateral forces. The truss is designed to span between the

crane columns. Typically, the top flange of the girder acts as one chord of the truss while a back up beam

acts as the other chord. The diagonal members are typically angles. Preferably, the angles should be

bolted rather than welded. The crane girder will deflect downward when the crane passes, the back up

beam will not. The design of the diagonal members should account for the fixed end moments that will

be generated by this relative movement.

Walkways can be designed and detailed as a beam to transfer lateral loads to the crane columns. The

lacing design may need to be incorporated into the walk design. Similar to the crane lacing, the walkway

connection to the crane girder needs to account for the vertical deflection of the crane girder. If the

walkway is not intended to act as a beam, then the designer must isolate the walkway from the crane

girder.

The AISE Guide requires that crane runway girders with spans of 36 feet and over for AISE Building

Classifications A, B and C or runway girder spans 40 feet and over in AISE Class D buildings shall have

bottom flange bracing. This lacing is to be designed for 2½ percent of the maximum bottom flange force,

and is not to be welded to the bottom flange. Cross braces or diaphragms should not be added to this

bracing so as to allow for the deflection of the crane beam relative to the backup beam.

13-10

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 10: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

Various AISC fatigue provisions are applicable to lacing systems depending on the detail used to connect

the lacing to the runway girders and the back up girder.

Rail Attachments

The rail to girder attachments must perform the following functions:

• transfer the lateral loads from the top of the rail to the top of the girder.

• allow the rail to float longitudinally relative to the top flange of the girder.

• hold the rail in place laterally.

• allow for lateral adjustment or alignment of the rail.

The relative longitudinal movement of the crane rail to the top flange of crane girder is caused by

longitudinal expansion and contraction of the rail in response to changes in temperature and shortening of

the girder compression flange due to the applied vertical load of the crane.

There are four commonly accepted methods of attaching light rails supporting relatively small and light

duty cranes. Hook bolts should be limited to CMAA Class A, B and C cranes with a maximum capacity

of approximately 20 tons. Hook bolts work well for smaller crane girders that do not have adequate space

on the top flange for rail clips or clamps. Longitudinal motion the crane rail relative to the runway girder

may cause the hook bolts to loosen or elongate. Therefore, crane runways with hook bolts should be

regularly inspected and maintained. AISC recommends that hook bolts be installed in pairs at a

maximum spacing of 24 inches on center. The use of hook bolts eliminates the need to drill the top flange

of the girder. However, these savings are offset by the need to drill the rails.

Rail clips are one piece castings or forgings that are usually bolted to the top of the girder flange. Many

clips are held in place with a single bolt. The single bolt type of clip is susceptible to twisting due to

longitudinal movement of the rail. This twisting of the clip causes a camming action that will tend to

push the rail out of alignment.

There are two types of rail clamps, tight and floating. Rail clamps are two part forgings or pressed steel

assemblies that are bolted to the top flange of the girder. The AISE Technical Report No. 13 requires that

rail clips allow for longitudinal float of the rail and that the clips restrict the lateral movement to ¼ inch

inward or outward. When crane rails are installed with resilient pads between the rail and the girder, the

13-11

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 11: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

amount of lateral movement should be restricted to 1/32 inch to reduce the tendency of the pad to work

out from under the rail.

Patented rail clips are typically two part castings or forgings that are bolted or welded to the top flange of

the crane girder. The patented rail clips have been engineered to address the complex requirements of

successfully attaching the crane rail to the crane girder. Compared to traditional clips, the patented clips

provide greater ease in installation and adjustment and provide the needed performance with regard to

allowing longitudinal movement and restraining lateral movement. The appropriate size and spacing of

the patented clips can be determined from the manufacturer's literature. When rail clips are attached to

the runway girder by welding the runway girder top flange stress must be checked using the requirement

of Section 7.1 of the AISC fatigue provisions.

Miscellaneous Attachments

Miscellaneous attachments to crane runway girders should be avoided. The AISE Guide specifically

prohibits welding attachments to the tension flange of runway girders. Brackets to support the runway

electrification are often necessary. If the brackets are bolted to the web of the girder, fatigue

consequences are relatively minor, i.e. stress category B, Section 1.3 of the AISC Fatigue Specifications.

However, if the attachment is made with fillet welds Section 7.2 of the Fatigue Specification applies.

This provision places the detail into stress category D or E depending on the detail.

EXAMPLE

Design a welded plate girder to support the following pair of cranes. The runway beams are to be

designed for 2,000,000 cycles and the owner has required conformance with the AISE Guide for the

Design and Construction of Mill Buildings. Use the 1999 AISC fatigue provisions and the prescriptive

requirements of AISE.

Crane Capacity: (2) 30 ton magnet cranes

Wheel Spacing: 22 feet - two wheels per end truck

Crane Spacing: 11 feet between wheels

Bridge Length: 100 feet

Bridge Weight: 270 kips

Trolley Weight: 30 kips

Maximum Wheel Load: 108 kips

Rail Size: 135#/rail with welded clamps

13-12

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 12: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

Runway Girder Span: 40 feet

Determine the maximum moment due to the two cranes:

Position the crane with the center of the girder midway between one wheel and the centroid of the load.

Allow 500 plf for the girder and attachments.

(two cranes - no impact)

Determine the maximum lateral load per wheel. Per AISE 3.4.2:

V equals 100% of the lifted load

or 20% of the lifted load plus trolley

or 10% of the lifted load plus the crane weight

Determine the maximum lateral movement for two cranes:

Per AISE 3.10.2 use 50% of the single maximum lateral load for multiple cranes. Position the wheels at

the same location as for the maximum vertical load.

13-13

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 13: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

Determine the maximum vertical moment for one crane.

Include 25% impact per AISE 3.4.

Determine the maximum lateral moment for one crane:

Determine the required moment of inertia to limit the maximum vertical deflection of L/1000.

The critical location occurs when the wheel loads are centered on the girder.

Trial Section

Try a plate girder with a 28 in. x 1.5 in. top flange, 22 in. x 1 in. bottom flange and a 42 in. 1 ½ in. web.

The girder has the following cross section properties.

13-14

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 14: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

Check bending stresses for two crane with 50% of the maximum lateral load acting per crane.

Note the lateral loads are increased to account for the rail height of 5.75 inches.

Per AISC F1-G

Per AISC F2-1

Check combined stresses per AISC H103:

Check bending stresses for one crane:

Check shear on the girder web:

Check sidesway web buckling per AISC K1-7:

13-15

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 15: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

Fatigue Design

The allowable stresses for fatigue design are based on the 1999 AISC Specification Appendix K. In

accordance with AISE Section 3.10 fatigue loading is based on either the vertical load from one crane

including impact and 50% of the maximum lateral load, or the vertical load from both cranes and 50% of

the maximum lateral load. The following fatigue conditions will be evaluated:

1. The tension flange flexural stress.2. The web to tension flange shear flow stress.3. The top flange at the rail clips for lateral load flexural stress.4. The weld at the base of the intermediate stiffeners.

1. Tension Flange

Check the tension flange. Only the live load moment is used to determine the bending stress.

From the 1999 AISC Specifications Table A-K3.1, Stress Category B, Section 3.1,

2. Web to Flange Welds

Determine the fillet weld size for the bottom flange attachment to the web. This fillet weld is designed to

provide adequate shear flow capacity. The shear is based on the maximum live load shear on the girder.

13-16

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 16: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

From the 1999 AISC Specifications Table A-K3.1, Section 8.2, Stress Category F,

Use 3/8 fillet welds NS/FS.

At the top flange use a full penetration weld with contoured fillets per AISE Technical Report #13.

3. Intermediate Stiffener Welds

Assume that intermediate stiffeners are provided at equal spaces along the length of the girder. The

flexural stress level at the bottom weld termination of the stiffeners needs to be checked. It should be

emphasized that the flexural stress at this location is not a stress in the stiffener weld. Rather, it is the

flexural stress that occurs at the location of this stress riser. Per AISC Table A-K3.1, Section 5.7, the

Stress Category C is appropriate, and

Per AISC G4 terminate the intermediate stiffener between 4 and 6 times the web thickness from the near

toe of the flange to web weld.

Determine the distance from the end of the stiffener to the neutral axis.

Determine the stress range at the end of the stiffener.

13-17© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.

This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 17: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

4. Top Flange Rail Clips

The fatigue concern at the top flange of the girder is created by the stress due to the lateral loads. The

vertical wheel loads always cause compressive stress in the top flange. Since fatigue cracks do not

propagate in regions of compressive stress, a check will be made of the various combinations of minimum

vertical load with maximum lateral load to determine if any of the loading conditions results in a net

tension.

For the condition at the top flange, the critical location occurs at the weld of the clip to the top flange.

Depending on the configuration of the attachment, the appropriate Stress Category from Table A-K3.1,

Section 7.1, is either C, D, E or E'.

The distance from the center of the top flange to the back of the clip is 5.25 inches.

The minimum wheel load is 72 kips.

Check two cranes:

13-18© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.

This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 18: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

Therefore no net tension occurs for the two crane condition.

Check one crane:

Include impact and 50% lateral load for the minimum wheel load of 72 kips

No net tension occurs for the single crane loading condition.

No further fatigue investigation is required for the top flange.

13-19© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.

This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 19: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

APPENDIX

1999 AISC FATIGUE PROVISIONS

13-20© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.

This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 20: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFT(The following replaces the entire old Appendix K3)

K3 DESIGN FOR CYCLIC LOADING (FATIGUE)

This appendix applies to members and connections subject to high cycleloading within the elastic range of stresses of frequency and magnitudesufficient to initiate cracking and progressive failure (fatigue).

1. GeneralThe provisions of this section apply to stresses calculated on the basis ofUnfactored loads. The maximum permitted stress due to Unfactored loads is0.66

Stress range is defined as the magnitude of the change in stress due to theapplication or removal of the Unfactored live load. In the case of a stressreversal, the stress range shall be computed as the numerical sum ofmaximum repeated tensile and compressive stresses or the numerical sum ofmaximum shearing stresses of opposite direction at the point of probablecrack initiation.

In the case of complete joint penetration butt welds, the maximum designstress range calculated by Equation A-K3.1 applies only to welds withinternal soundness meeting the acceptance requirements of Section 6.12.2 or6.13.2 of AWS D1.1.

No evaluation of fatigue resistance is required if the live load stress range isless than the threshold stress range, See Table A-K3.1.

No evaluation of fatigue resistance is required if the number of cycles ofapplication of live load is less than 2 x 104.

The cyclic load resistance determined by the provisions of this appendix isapplicable to structures with suitable corrosion protection or subject only tomildly corrosive atmospheres, such as normal atmospheric conditions.

The cyclic load resistance determined by the provisions of this appendix isapplicable only to structures subject to temperatures not exceeding 300° F(150° C).

The Engineer of Record shall provide either complete details including weldsizes or shall specify the planned cycle life and the maximum range ofmoments, shears and reactions for the connections.

2. Calculation of Maximum Stresses and Stress Ranges

Calculated stresses shall be based upon elastic analysis. Stresses shall not beamplified by stress concentration factors for geometrical discontinuities.

For bolts and threaded rods subject to axial tension, the calculated stressesshall include the effects of prying action, if any.

In the case of axial stress combined with bending, the maximum stresses, ofeach kind, shall be those determined for concurrent arrangements of theapplied load.

11/09/99 APPENDICES 16413-21

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 21: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTFor members having symmetric cross sections, the fasteners and welds shallbe arranged symmetrically about the axis of the member, or the total stressesincluding those due to eccentricity shall be included in the calculation of thestress range.

For axially loaded angle members where the center of gravity of theconnecting welds lies between the line of the center of gravity of the anglecross section and the center of the connected leg, the effects of eccentricityshall be ignored. If the center of gravity of the connecting welds lies outsidethis zone, the total stresses, including those due to joint eccentricity, shall beincluded in the calculation of stress range.

3. Design Stress Range

The range of stress at service loads shall not exceed the stress range computedas follows.

(a) For stress categories except category A, B, B', C, D, E and E' the designstress range, shall be determined by Equation A-K3.1.

(A-K3.1)

Metric: (A-K3.1M)

where

Design stress range, ksi (MPa)Constant from Table A-K3.1 for categoryNumber of stress range fluctuations in design lifeNumber of stress range fluctuations per day x 365 x years of designlifeThreshold fatigue stress range, maximum stress range for indefinitedesign life from Table A-K3.1, ksi

(b) For stress category F, the design stress range, shall be determinedby Equation A-K3.2.

(A-K3.2)

Metric: (A-K3.2M)

(c) For tension-loaded plate elements at their end by cruciform, T or cornerdetails with complete joint penetration welds or partial joint penetrationwelds, fillet welds, or combinations of the preceding, transverse to thedirection of stress, the maximum stress range on the cross section of thetension-loaded plate element at the toe of the weld shall be determinedas follows:

11/09/99 APPENDICES 16513-22

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 22: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTBased upon crack initiation from the toe of the weld on the tensionloaded plate element the design stress range, shall be determined byEquation A-K3.1, for Category C which is equal to

Metric:

Based upon crack initiation from the root of the weld the design stressrange, on the tension loaded plate element using transverse partial-joint- penetration welds, with or without reinforcing or contouring filletwelds, the design stress range on the cross section at the toe of the weldshall be determined by Equation A-K3.3, Category C' as follows:

(A-K3.3)

Metric: (A-K3.3M)

where:

reduction factor for reinforced or non-reinforced transverse PJPjoints

the length of the non-welded root face in the direction of thethickness of the tension-loaded plate, in. (mm)the leg size of the reinforcing or contouring fillet, if any, in thedirection of the thickness of the tension-loaded plate, in. (mm)thickness of tension loaded plate, in. (mm)

Based upon crack initiation from the roots of a pair of transverse filletwelds on opposite sides of the tension loaded plate element the designstress range, on the cross section at the toe of the welds shall bedetermined by Equation A-K3.4, Category C" as follows:

(A-K3.4)

Metric: (A-K3.4M)

4. Bolts and Threaded Parts

11/09/99 APPENDICES 16613-23

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 23: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFT(a) For mechanically fastened connections loaded in shear, the maximum

range of stress in the connected material at service loads shall not exceedthe design stress range computed using Equation A-K3.1 where andare taken from Section 2 of Table A-K3.1.

(b) For not-fully-tightened high-strength bolts, common bolts, and threadedanchor rods with cut, ground or rolled threads, the maximum range oftensile stress on the net tensile area from applied axial load and momentplus load due to prying action shall not exceed the design stress rangecomputed using Equation A-K3.1 or A-K3.1M. The factor shall betaken as 3.9 x 10 8 (as for category E'). The threshold stress, shall betaken as 7 ksi (as for category D). The net tensile area is given by EquationA-K3.5.

(A-K3.5)

Metric: (A-K3.5M)

where

pitch, mm per threadthe nominal diameter (body or shank diameter), in. (mm)threads per in.

In joints that are not fabricated and installed to satisfy all of the requirementsfor slip-critical connections (Section J3.8), except the requirements for fayingsurface condition, all axial load and moment applied to the joint plus effectsof prying action (if any) shall be assumed to be carried exclusively by thebolts or rods.

In joints that are fabricated and installed to satisfy all of the requirements forslip-critical connections, except requirements for faying surface condition, ananalysis of the relative stiffness of the connected parts and bolts shall bepermitted to be used to determine the tensile stress range in the pretensionedbolts due to the total service live load and moment plus effects of pryingaction. Alternatively, the stress range in the bolts shall be assumed to be equalto the stress on the net tensile area due to 20 percent of the absolute value ofthe service load axial load and moment from dead, live and other loads.

5. Special Fabrication and Erection Requirements

Longitudinal backing bars are permitted to remain in place, and if used, shallbe continuous. If splicing is necessary for long joints, the bar shall be joinedwith complete penetration butt joints and the reinforcement ground prior toassembly in the joint.

In transverse joints subject to tension, backing bars, if used, shall be removedand the joint back gouged and welded.

In transverse complete joint penetration tee and corner joints, a single passreinforcing fillet weld, not less than ¼ in. (6 mm) in size shall be added at re-entrant corners.

11/09/99 APPENDICES 16713-24

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 24: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTThe surface roughness of flame cut edges subject to significant cyclic stressranges shall not exceed 1 000 µin. (25 µm), where ASME B46.1 is thereference standard.

Re-entrant corners at cuts, copes and weld access holes shall form a radius ofnot less than 3/8 in. (10 mm) by pre-drilling or sub-punching and reaming ahole, or by thermal cutting to form the radius of the cut. If the radius portionis formed by thermal cutting, the cut surface shall be ground to a bright metalsurface with a surface roughness value not more than(ASME B46.1).

For transverse butt joints in regions of high tensile stress, run-off tabs shall beused to provide for cascading the weld termination outside the finished joint.End dams shall not be used. Run-off tabs shall be removed and the end of theweld finished flush with the edge of the member.

See Section J2.2b Fillet Weld Terminations for requirements for end returnson certain fillet welds subject to cyclic service loading.

11/09/99 APPENDICES 16813-25

1 000 µin. (25 µm)

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 25: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1

Fatigue Design ParametersDescription Stress

CategoryConstant

C1

ThresholdFTH

ksi

Potential CrackInitiation Point

SECTION 1 - PLAIN MATERIAL AWAY FROM ANY WELDING

1.1 Base metal, except non-coatedweathering steel, with rolled or cleanedsurface Flame-cut edges with surfaceroughness value of 1 000 µin (25 µm)or less, but without re-entrant corners.1.2 Non-coated weathering steel basemetal with rolled or cleaned surface.Flame-cut edges with surfaceroughness value of 1 000 µin (25 µm)or less, but without re-entrant corners1.3 Member with drilled or reamedholes. Member with re-entrant cornersat copes, cuts, block-outs or othergeometrical discontinuities made torequirements of Appendix K3 5, exceptweld access holes, with surfaceroughness value of 1 000 µin (25 µm)or less

1.4 Rolled cross sections with weldaccess holes made to requirements ofSection J1.6 and Appendix K3.5.Members with drilled or reamed holescontaining bolts for attachment of lightbracing where there is a smalllongitudinal component of brace force.

A

B

B

C

250x108

120 x108

120 x108

44x108

24

24

16

10

Away from allwelds or structuralconnections

Away from allwelds or structuralconnections

At any externaledge or at holeperimeter

At reentrant cor-ner of weld accesshole or at anysmall hole (maycontain bolt forminor connec-tions)

SECTION 2 - CONNECTED MATERIAL IN MECHANICALLY FASTENED JOINTS

2.1 Gross area of base metal in lapjoints connected by high-strength boltsin joints satisfying all requirements forslip-critical connections

2.2 Base metal at net section of high-strength bolted joints, designed on thebasis of bearing resistance, butfabricated and installed to allrequirements for slip-criticalconnections2.3 Base metal at the net section ofother mechanically fastened jointsexcept eye bars and pin plates.

2.4 Base metal at net section of eyebarhead or pin plate.

B

B

D

E

120x108

120x108

22x108

11 x108

16

16

7

4.5

Through grosssection near hole

In net sectionoriginating at sideof hole

In net sectionoriginating at sideof holeIn net sectionoriginating at sideof hole

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-26

169

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 26: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1 (cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

Illustrative Typical Examples

SECTION 1 - PLAIN MATERIAL AWAY FROM ANY WELDING

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-27

170

SECTION 2 - CONNECTED MATERIAL IN MECHANICALLY FASTENED JOINTS

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 27: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design ParametersDescription Stress

CategoryConstant

cf1

ThresholdFTH

ksi

Potential CrackInitiation Point

SECTION 3 - WELDED JOINTS JOINING COMPONENTS OR BUILT-UP MEMBERS

3.1 Base metal and filler metal inmembers without attachments built-upof plates or shapes connected bycontinuous longitudinal completepenetration groove welds, back gougedand welded from second side, or bycontinuous fillet welds.

3.2 Base metal and filler metal inmembers without attachments built-upof plates or shapes, connected bycontinuous longitudinal completepenetration groove welds with backingbars not removed, or by continuouspartial joint penetration groove welds.

3.3 Base metal and weld metaltermination of longitudinal welds at weldaccess holes in connected built-upmembers.

3.4 Base metal at ends of longitudinalintermittent fillet weld segments.

3.5 Base metal at ends of partial lengthwelded coverplates narrower than theflange having square or tapered ends,with or without welds across the ends ofcoverplates wider than the flange withwelds across the ends.

Flange thickness < 0.8 in. (20 mm)

Flange thickness > 0.8 in. (20 mm)

3.6 Base metal at ends of partial lengthwelded coverplates wider than theflange without welds across the ends.

B

B'

D

E

E

E'

E'

120x108

61 x 108

22x108

11 x108

11 x108

3.9 x108

3.9 x 108

16

12

7

4.5

4.5

2.6

2.6

From surface orinternaldiscontinuities inweld away fromend of weld

From surface orinternaldiscontinuities inweld, includingweld attachingbacking bars

From the weldtermination intothe web or flange

In connectedmaterial at startand stop locationsof any welddeposit

In flange at toe ofend weld or inflange attermination oflongitudinal weldor in edge offlange with widecoverplates

In edge of flangeat end ofcoverplate weld

SECTION 4 - LONGITUDINAL FILLET WELDED END CONNECTIONS

4.1 Base metal at junction of axiallyloaded members with longitudinallywelded end connections. Welds shallbe on each side of the axis of themember to balance weld stresses.t<½-in. (13mm)

t>½-in. (13mm)

E

E'

11x108

3.9x108

4.5

2.6

Initiating from endof any weldterminationextending into thebase metal

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-28

171

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 28: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFT

TABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

Illustrative Typical Examples

SECTION 3 - WELDED JOINTS JOINING COMPONENTS OF BUILT-UP MEMBERS

SECTION 4 - LONGITUDINAL FILLET WELDED END CONNECTIONS

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-29

172

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 29: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

5.1 Base metal and filler metal in oradjacent to complete joint penetrationgroove welded splices in rolled orwelded cross sections with weldsground essentially parallel to thedirection of stress.5.2 Base metal and filler metal in oradjacent to complete joint penetrationgroove welded splices with weldsground essentially parallel to thedirection of stress at transitions inthickness or width made on a slope nogreater than 8 to 20%.

5.3 Base metal with equal to orgreater than 90 ksi (620 MPa) and fillermetal in or adjacent to complete jointpenetration groove welded splices withwelds ground essentially parallel to thedirection of stress at transitions in widthmade on a radius of not less than 2 ft.(600 mm) with the point of tangency atthe end of the groove weld.5.4 Base metal and filler metal in oradjacent to the toe of complete jointpenetration T or corner joints or splices,with or without transitions in thicknesshaving slopes no greater than 8 to 20%,when weld reinforcement is notremoved.5.5 Base metal and weld metal attransverse end connections of tension-loaded plate elements using partial jointpenetration butt or T or corner joints,with reinforcing or contouring fillets,shall be the smaller of the toe crack orroot crack stress range.Crack initiating from weld toe:

Crack initiating from weld root:

B

B

B'

B

C

C

C'

120 x 108

120 x108

61 x108

120 x108

44x108

44x108

Eqn.(A-K3.3)

16

16

12

16

10

10

Noneprovided

From internaldiscontinuities infiller metal oralong the fusionboundary

From internaldiscontinuities infiller metal oralong fusionboundary or atstart of transitionwhen(620 MPa)

From internaldiscontinuities infiller metal ordiscontinuitiesalong the fusionboundary

From surfacediscontinuity at toeof weld extendinginto base metal oralong fusionboundary.

Initiating fromgeometricaldiscontinuity at toeof weld extendinginto base metal or,initiating at weldroot subject totension extendingup and then outthrough weld

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-30

173

Description StressCategory

Constant Threshold Potential CrackInitiation Point

SECTION 5 - WELDED JOINTS TRANSVERSE TO DIRECTION OF STRESS

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 30: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

TABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-31

174

Illustrative Examples

SECTION 6 - WELDED JOINTS TRANSVERSE TO DIRECTION OF STRESS

DRAFT

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 31: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

5.6 Base metal and filler metal attransverse end connections of tension-loaded plate elements using a pair offillet welds on opposite sides of theplate. shall be the smaller of thetoe crack or root crack stress range.Crack initiating from weld toe:

Crack initiating from weld root:

5.7 Base metal of tension loaded plateelements and on girders and rolledbeam webs or flanges at toe oftransverse fillet welds adjacent towelded transverse stiffeners.

C

C"

C

44 x 108

Eqn.(A-K3.4)

44x108

10

Noneprovided

10

Initiating fromgeometricaldiscontinuity at toeof weld extendinginto base metal or,initiating at weldroot subject totension extendingup and then outthrough weld

From geometricaldiscontinuity at toeof fillet extendinginto base metal

6.1 Base metal at details attached bycomplete joint penetration groove weldssubject to longitudinal loading onlywhen the detail embodies a transitionradius R with the weld terminationground smooth.

B

C

D

E

120 x 108

44x108

22x108

11 x 108

16

10

7

4.5

Near point oftangency of radiusat edge of member

11/09/99 APPENDICES 17513-32

Description StressCategory

Constant Threshold Potential CrackInitiation Point

SECTION 5 - WELDED JOINTS TRANSVERSE TO DIRECTION OF STRESS (cont'd)

SECTION 6 - BASE METAL AT WELDED TRANSVERSE MEMBER CONNECTIONS

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 32: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFT

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-33

176

SECTION 5 - WELDED JOINTS TRANSVERSE TO DIRECTION OF STRESS (cont'd)

SECTION 6 - BASE METAL AT WELDED TRANSVERSE MEMBER CONNECTIONS

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 33: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

6.2 Base metal at details of equalthickness attached by complete jointpenetration groove welds subject totransverse loading with or withoutlongitudinal loading when the detailembodies a transition radius R with theweld termination ground smooth:When weld reinforcement is removed:

(600 mm > 150 mm)

2 in. (50 mm) > R

When weld reinforcement is notremoved:

2 in. (50 mm) > R

6.3 Base metal at details of unequalthickness attached by complete jointpenetration groove welds subject totransverse loading with or withoutlongitudinal loading when the detailembodies a transition radius R with theweld termination ground smooth.

When weld reinforcement is removed:

When reinforcement is not removed:

Any radius

B

C

D

E

C

C

D

E

D

E

E

120 x108

44x108

22x108

11 x 108

44x108

44x108

22x108

11 x 108

22x108

11 x 108

11 X 108

16

10

7

4.5

10

10

7

4.5

74.5

4.5

Near points oftangency of radiusor in the weld or atfusion boundary ormember orattachment

At toe of the weldeither along edgeof member or theattachment

At toe of weldalong edge ofthinner material

In weld terminationin small radius

At toe of weldalong edge ofthinner material

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-34

177

Description StressCategory

Constant Threshold Potential CrackInitiation Point

SECTION 6 - BASE METAL AT WELDED TRANSVERSE MEMBER CONNECTIONS (cont'd)

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 34: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFT

11/09/99 APPENDICES 17813-35

SECTION 6 - BASE METAL AT WELDED TRANSVERSE MEMBER CONNECTIONS(cont'd)

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 35: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

6.4 Base metal subject to longitudinalstress at transverse members, with orwithout transverse stress, attached byfillet or partial penetration groove weldsparallel to direction of stress when thedetail embodies a transition radius, R,with weld termination ground smooth:

D

E

22x108

11 x108

74.5

In weld terminationor from the toe ofthe weld extendinginto member

7.1 Base metal subject to longitudinalloading at details attached by completepenetration groove welds parallel todirection of stress where the detailembodies a transition radius, R, lessthan 2 in. (50 mm), and with detaillength in direction of stress, a, andattachment height normal to surface ofmember, to:

a < 2 in. (50 mm)

or 4 in (100mm)

a> 12b or 4in. (100mm)when b is > 1 in. (25 mm)

7.2 Base metal subject to longitudinalstress at details attached by fillet orpartial joint penetration groove welds,with or without transverse load ondetail, when the detail embodies atransition radius, R, with weldtermination ground smooth:

R > 2 in. (50 mm)

C

D

E

E'

D

E

44 x 108

22 x 108

11x108

3.9 x108

22 x 108

11 x108

10

7

4.52.6

7

4.5

In the member atthe end of theweld

In weld terminationextending intomember

1 "Attachment" as used herein, is defined as any steel detail welded to a member which, by its merepresence and independent of its loading, causes a discontinuity in the stress flow in the member and thusreduces the fatigue resistance.

11/09/99 APPENDICES 17913-36

Description StressCategory

Constant Threshold Potential CrackInitiation Point

SECTION 6 - BASE METAL AT WELDED TRANSVERSE MEMBER CONNECTIONS (cont'd)

SECTION 7 - BASE METAL AT SHORT ATTACHMENTS

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 36: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFT

11/09/99 APPENDICES 18013-37

SECTION 6 - BASE METAL AT WELDED TRANSVERSE MEMBER CONNECTIONS(cont'd)

SECTION 7 - BASE METAL AT SHORT ATTACHMENTS

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 37: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

8.1 Base metal at stud-type shearconnectors attached by fillet or electricstud welding.

8.2 Shear on throat of continuous orintermittent longitudinal or transversefillet welds.

8.3 Base metal at plug or slot welds

8.4 Shear on plug or slot welds

8.5 Not fully-tightened high-strengthbolts, common bolts, threaded anchorrods and hanger rods with cut, groundor rolled threads. Stress range ontensile stress area due to live load plusprying action when applicable.

C

F

E

F

E'

44x108

50x1010

(FormulaA-K3.2)

11 x 108

50X1010

(FormulaA-F3.2)

3.9 x108

10

8

4.5

8

7

At toe of weld inbase metal

In throat of weld

At end of weld inbase metal

At faying surface

At the root of thethreads extendinginto the tensilestress area

11/09/99 APPENDICES 18113-38

Description StressCategory

Constant Threshold Potential CrackInitiation Point

SECTION 8 - MISCELLANEOUS

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Page 38: New Fatigue Provisions for the Design of Crane Runway Girders

DRAFTTABLE A-K3.1 (Cont'd)

Fatigue Design Parameters

11/09/99 APPENDICES13-39

182

SECTION 8 - MISCELLANEOUS

© 2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved.This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.