Nevin Shapiro Shook Hardy Complaint

7/29/2019 Nevin Shapiro Shook Hardy Complaint

1/92

EXHIBIT A

Case 1:13-cv-20080-JEM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/09/2013 Page 1 of 92


2/92



3/92



4/92



5/92



6/92



7/92



8/92



9/92



10/92



11/92



12/92



13/92



14/92



15/92



16/92



17/92



18/92



19/92



20/92



21/92



22/92



23/92



24/92



25/92



26/92



27/92



28/92



29/92



30/92



31/92



32/92



33/92



34/92



35/92



36/92



37/92



38/92



39/92



40/92



41/92



42/92



43/92



44/92



45/92



46/92



47/92



48/92



49/92



50/92



51/92



52/92



53/92



54/92



55/92



56/92



57/92



58/92



59/92



60/92



61/92



62/92



63/92



64/92



65/92



66/92



67/92



68/92



69/92



70/92



71/92



72/92



73/92



74/92



75/92



76/92



77/92



78/92



79/92



80/92



81/92



82/92



83/92



84/92



85/92



86/92



87/92



88/92



89/92



90/92



91/92

1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION

JOEL L. TABAS, in his capacity as bothChapter 7 Trustee of Capitol Investments USA,

Inc. and as Assignee to the Claims of Bayside

Capital Management, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHOOK, HARDY AND BACON, L.L.P. and

MARC LEVINSON, an Individual

Defendants.

/

CASE NO. 12-48825 CA 10

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

THIS MATTER has come before the Court on Defendants Unopposed Motion forEnlargement of Time to Respond to the Complaint. This Court has considered the Motion and it

is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

1. The Motion for Enlargement of Time is GRANTED.2. Defendants shall have up to and including January 25, 2013, to respond to the

Complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida, on

01/04/13.

_______________________________PETER R. LOPEZCIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

The parties served with this Order are indicated in the accompanying 11th Circuit emailconfirmation which includes all emails provided by the submitter. The movant shall



92/92

IMMEDIATELY serve a true and correct copy of this Order, by mail, facsimile, email orhand-delivery, to all parties/counsel of record for whom service is not indicated by theaccompanying 11th Circuit confirmation, and file proof of service with the Clerk ofCourt.

Signed and stamped original Order sent to court file by Judge Lopezs staff.

Copies provided to all counsel of record


Documents

Nevin Shapiro Shook Hardy Complaint