Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners · Youth Hunters Born in 1994, applying in 2006-2011: Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Youth Hunts – Late DOBs 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr

Nevada Board of Wildlife

Commissioners

Tag Allocation & Application Hunt

Committee

As of August 10, 2007

This presentation reflects committee recommendations to the Nevada Board

of Wildlife Commissioners. The commission met on August 10, 2007 to hear

from the committee and make final decisions on:

Application opportunities for Youth Hunt

Bonus point system, including party bonus points, youth bonus point

carry-forward and senior bonus point advantage

Revisiting a preferential system

This presentation represents the conclusion of PHASE 1 efforts

of the TAAHC

Tag Allocation & Application Hunt Committee

Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt

Committee* *Established

August 2006

1

Authority The Chairman of the Nevada Board of Wildlife

Commissioners established the TAAHC on August 5, 2006

Purpose

The Committee will review:

- issues of tag allocation based on sound biological principles

- evaluate potential changes to the application hunt and draw

processes

- make recommendations to the Board of Wildlife Commissioners

regarding their research and findings

(TAAHC) Authority and Purpose


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

2

Objectives for Tag Allocation Issues

Using sound biological principles, balance the sportsmen’s desire for

hunting opportunity and the available wildlife resource with sound

biological management decisions

To ensure sportsmen have input and consideration into quality vs.

quantity opportunities in the allocation of tags

To review and recommend revisions or updates to any applicable

policies or procedures for the allocation of tags

To ensure an educational campaign to educate sportsmen for any

changes to the allocation methods or formulas

Objectives


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

3

Objectives for Application and Draw Issues

Consider sportsman desires regarding application processes (how they apply

for hunts)

Consider sportsman desires regarding the bonus point program

Consider sportsman desires regarding the order of the draw

Consider cost benefit analysis for proposed changes to existing program

Ensure proposed changes are considered in the budgeting process

Ensure adequate time for programming changes

Initiate regulatory review and revision for any proposed changes to the

application or draw processes

Ensure an educational campaign to educate sportsmen for any changes to

the application and draw processes

Objectives


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

4

Committee Membership – Appointed September 22, 2006

Commissioners

Jim Jeffress (Chairman)

Bevan Lister

Ron Lurie

Jack Robb

County Advisory Board

Rep at Large

Giovanni Giordano

Sportsmen Reps

Don Cavin (prior commissioner)

Jeremy Drew

NDOW Support Staff

Bob Haughian (Chief, Ops Bureau)

Julie Meadows (License Office)


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

5

Purpose

This presentation addresses tag allocation & application hunt topics communicated

to the TAAHC by County Wildlife Advisory Boards (CWABs) and from sportsmen

This presentation specifically addresses only the topics of Bonus Points, Youth Hunts

and Preference and is being referred to as PHASE 1. Other topics such as tag

eligibility, waiting periods, returning tags, etc, will be addressed in the future using a

similar format

This presentation has been provided to CWABs to facilitate discussions and to

educate attendees to the issues being addressed by the TAAHC

To assure widest public dissemination, this presentation is also posted on the NDOW

website (http://www.ndow.org/learn/com/committee/index.shtm) to encourage your

review of the material and to encourage your participation at your local CWAB meeting.

To find a meeting date and location near you, go to http://www.ndow.org/learn/cab/

TAAHC recommendations motioned during the meeting of July 19, 2007, will be

presented to the Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners during the August 10 & 11

2007 commission meeting in Ely.

Purpose of this Presentation

http://www.ndow.org/learn/com/committee/index.shtm

http://www.ndow.org/learn/cab/


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

6

Category – Youth

Background

Potential Application Changes

Potential Draw Changes

Category – Bonus Points

Background



Agenda – Youth Topics & Bonus Points

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Agenda


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

7

Category – Youth

Background




Background



Tag Allocation & Application Topics – Agenda



Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

8

1995 Junior Hunt 1107 offered for antlerless deer in the

Cherry Creek Drainage

1996 & 1997 – Junior Hunt not offered

1998 – Junior Hunt for all choices and either sex deer

Original intent was for 4 opportunities to draw

2000 – Definition of Junior Hunt in regulation – tied to Junior

License

2003 – Current language for Junior Hunt definition adopted

Will attain 12th birthday before the first day of each hunting season

applied for

Will not attain 17th birthday until after the last day of each hunting

season applied for

Youth Hunt Chronology:

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Youth Hunts – Background


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

9

Must turn 12 by the earliest season they apply for

Typically an archery hunt

Typically in August or early September

Must NOT turn 17 before the end of the latest season

they apply for

Typically an any legal weapon hunt

Typically in November

Could be in December or even early January

Are sportsmen with late DOBs disadvantaged by this hunt?

Youth Hunter Late DOB Background:

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Youth Hunts – Late DOBs


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

10

Youth Hunters Born in 1994, applying in 2006-2011:


Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006

← Month of DOB →






4 Years 5 Years

Can Apply Can Apply, depending on BD Cannot Apply


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

11

Category – Youth

Background




Background






Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

12

Change of regulation required

A change could be difficult to define unless it was

based upon a number of years eligible

Programming may be difficult depending on approach

Youth Hunt demand already outstrips supply

Late DOB Application Ramifications:

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Youth Hunts


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Committee Motion: Youth will be able to apply for the youth

hunt four years maximum.

Motion carried.

Fiscal Impact: To be determined.

August 10 Commission Motion: Agreed with committee

recommendation.

13



Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

14

Category – Youth

Background




Background




Agenda – Bonus Points & Youth Topics


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

15

Category – Youth

Background




Background






Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

16

Bonus Points Chronology:

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Bonus Points Chronology

1991 legislative session Senate Bill 506 required NDOW to

privatize the big game application hunt process and draw

Spring 1992 – Commission requested the Committee on

Application Hunts to review the current “preferential system”

Fall 1992 – Commission approved the selection of the Bonus

Point program to replace the preferential system

Spring 1993 – Unsuccessful applicants in 1992 came into the

bonus point program with one point

Spring of 1996 – Partnership in Wildlife (PIW) Hunt added to the

system


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

17

Spring 1997 – Guided Draw added to the computerized drawing

process and included in the bonus point program

1998 – Squaring of bonus points (for deer)

1998 – Bonus point transfer authorized if a change of residence

1999 – Squaring of bonus points (for big game)

2000 – Regulation change to categories of species occurred. This

change consolidated the points into the category

Allowed application for more than one weapon type for a species.

Prior to this the client had to select all hunter choices from one

weapon type (rifle or archery or muzzleloader; not a mix)

Bonus Points Chronology (cont):



Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

18

2001 – PIW fee changed to $10

Originally, client donated the total deer tag fee and ½ of the big

game tag fee to participate in the PIW drawing

2002 – Regulation changed affecting rejected applications and

retention of bonus points

Rejected applications were no longer counted as a “non-application.”

A rejected application did not earn a point, but also did not count

against the species category to lose points. Up to this point rejected

applications were considered non-application and applied toward the

2 years that would cause loss of bonus points

2004 – Applying for bonus points without applying for a tag

implemented

Bonus Points Chronology (cont):



Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

19

Category – Youth

Background




Background






Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

20

A.1.1 Leave as is

A.1.2 Old Preferential System for Deer

A.1.3 Weighted Preferential System

A.1.4 Youth Points Carry Forward

A.1.5 Squaring of Bonus Points

A.1.6 Party Bonus Points

A.1.6.1 Party Bonus Points – Lowest Number in Party

A.1.6.2 Party Bonus Points – Round Average Down

instead of up

Potential Bonus Point Changes

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Bonus Point Potential

Application Changes

NOTE: Categories (i.e., A.1.1) reference the TAAHC’s

Topic List, Apr 10, 2007


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

21

A.1.7 Weighted Bonus Point Draw with Point Cap

A.1.8 Weighted Bonus Point Draw

A.1.8.1 Set aside a percentage of quotas

A.1.8.2 Grouped Preference (0 to 3 points, 4 to 7, etc.)

A.1.9 Accumulated Bonus Point Draw (draw those with

bonus points before those with none)

A.1.9.1 Draw Applicants with most points first, if there

are still tags, go to the group below

A.1.10 High points/High Age to have “Advantage”

Potential Bonus Point Changes (cont)


Application Changes


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

22

Residents who become non-residents or non-

residents who become residents can request NDOW

to transfer their bonus points

Should youth hunters be allowed to carry-over bonus

points when they have accumulated 1107 bonus

points and then move on to become adults?

Youth Hunt Bonus Point Carry-over:

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Application Topics


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Total 0 1 2 3 4

# Applications Clients Tags Tags Tags Tags Tags

1 of 4 years 32 10 22 --- --- ---

2 of 4 years 32 2 18 12 --- ---

3 of 4 years 99 8 32 46 13 ---

4 of 4 years 215 5 40 120 45 5

Class of 2000 Total 378 25 112 178 58 5


Youth Bonus Point Carry-Over

Hunt Application Patterns for 12 year olds (as of 2000)

applying from 2000 through 2003

23


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

1107 Bonus Points going into 2006 for Hunters Born after

1/1/1990 and on or before 12/31/1990 (16 years old)

Points Clients

0 1,054

1 155

2 15

3 4

4 None

Total 1,228



24


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006



Committee Motion: Youth Bonus Points will be rolled over to

1331, 1341, 1371 hunts but no more than one point per year will

be rolled over. Bonus points will be automatically carried

forward in the draw when the youth is no longer eligible for any

youth hunt.

Motion carried.

Fiscal Impact: To be determined.


recommendation.

25


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

26

Do individuals with more bonus points obtain more

tags?

Should some tags be set aside for individuals with

more bonus points to insure that they will obtain them?

Are Bonus Points Working?

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Are Bonus Points

Working?


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Bonus Points – How Many Draw Numbers?

Party

Bonus

Points

Points

Squared

+1 Point for the

Application

Total

Draw Numbers

Alpha 0 0 1 1

Bravo 1 1 1 2

Charlie 2 4 1 5

Delta 3 9 1 10

Echo 4 16 1 17

Foxtrot 5 25 1 26

Golf 6 36 1 37

Hotel 7 49 1 50

India 8 64 1 65

Lima 9 81 1 82

Kilo 10 100 1 101

Mike 11 121 1 122

November 12 144 1 145

Oscar 13 169 1 170

Papa 14 196 1 197

Quebec 15 225 1 226

27


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

28

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Bonus Point Potential Application

Changes – Elk Points/Applicants/Tags by Year

Points Applicants Tags % – Success Percentage

Y * Max -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 Totals

2

0

0

6

P 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA

A 194 244 220 223 250 318 353 488 574 701 1053 1234 1334 1739 3020 11,933

T 61 77 66 59 59 63 66 83 61 46 49 39 19 10 12 758

% 31.4% 31.6% 30% 26.5% 23.6% 19.8% 18.7% 17% 10.6% 6.6% 4.7% 3.2% 1.4% 0.6% 0.4% 6.4%

2

0

0

5

P 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA

A 279 368 319 319 321 398 446 602 732 846 1292 1458 1717 2725 NA 11,822

T 75 103 83 71 58 60 71 65 56 51 33 23 9 5 NA 763

% 26.9% 28% 26% 22.3% 18.1% 15.1% 15.9% 10.8% 7.7% 6% 2.6% 1.6% 0.5% 0.2% NA 6.5%

2

0

0

4

P 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA NA

A 407 530 423 416 419 518 556 740 870 1058 1598 1946 2723 NA NA 12,204

T 95 106 74 55 66 48 44 42 32 21 14 13 7 NA NA 617

% 23.3% 20% 17.5% 13.2% 15.8% 9.3% 7.9% 5.7% 3.7% 2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.3% NA NA 5.1%

2

0

0

3

P 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA NA NA

A 540 655 519 505 472 571 656 864 1039 1270 2058 2982 NA NA NA 12,131

T 86 92 74 56 27 33 28 19 20 9 3 6 NA NA NA 453

% 15.9% 14% 14.3% 11.1% 5.7% 5.8% 4.3% 2.2% 1.9% 0.7% 0.1% 0.2% NA NA NA 3.7%


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

29

Elk 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002

Percent of Tags to Maximum Points 8% 10% 15% 19% 26%

Percent of Tags to Highest Three

Points 27% 34% 45% 56% 62%

Percent with Maximum Points to

Total Applications 1.63% 2.36% 3.34% 4.45% 6.14%

Total Applicants with Maximum

Points 194 279 407 540 719

Number of Tags to Maximum Point

Holders 61 75 95 86 123

Percent of Applicants with

Maximum Points Receiving Tags 31.4% 26.9% 23.3% 15.9% 17.1%


Application Changes – Are Bonus Point Working?


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Number of Unique Hunter Choices for successful

and unsuccessful Elk applicants with max points

Drew? 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Tag 10 14 15 7 15 61

No Tag 46 32 22 7 26 133

Total 56 46 37 14 41 194

Drew? 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Tag 16.39% 22.95% 24.59% 11.48% 24.59% 100%

No Tag 34.59% 24.06% 16.54% 5.26% 19.55% 100%



30


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

31


Changes – Desert Bighorn Points/Applicants/Tags by Year


Y * Max -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 Totals

2

0

0

6

P 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA

A 156 157 141 186 150 169 243 277 364 380 628 708 690 875 1276 6,400

T 15 17 15 15 9 9 13 12 10 8 4 6 2 0 1 136

% 9.6% 10.8% 10.6% 8.1% 6.0% 5.3% 5.3% 4.3% 2.7% 2.1% 0.6% 0.8% 0.3% 0% 0.1% 2.1%

2

0

0

5

P 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA

A 185 179 159 208 161 191 265 308 386 410 719 800 809 1,169 NA 5,949

T 19 17 15 11 14 10 5 5 9 7 8 3 1 0 NA 124

% 10.3% 9.5% 9.4% 5.3% 8.7% 5.2% 1.9% 1.6% 2.3% 1.7% 1.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0% NA 2.1%

2

0

0

4

P 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA NA

A 217 208 182 232 182 222 300 364 462 505 884 1,002 1,193 NA NA 5,953

T 21 21 14 10 10 6 10 6 7 4 9 1 0 NA NA 119

% 9.7% 10.1% 7.7% 4.3% 5.5% 2.7% 3.3% 1.6% 1.5% 0.8% 1% 0.1% 0% NA NA 2%

2

0

0

3

P 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA NA NA

A 249 238 216 245 214 234 315 404 505 658 1,080 1,311 NA NA NA 5,669

T 21 19 21 10 11 9 5 6 5 4 3 1 NA NA NA 115

% 8.4% 8% 9.7% 4.1% 5.1% 3.8% 1.6% 1.5% 1% 0.6% 0.3% 0.1% NA NA NA 2%


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

32

Desert Bighorn Sheep 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002



Points 35% 41% 47% 53% 49%




Points 156 185 217 249 290


Holders 15 19 21 21 28






Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

33


Changes – California Bighorn Points/Applicants/Tags by Year


Y * Max -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 Totals

2

0

0

6

P 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA

A 224 189 149 147 143 146 192 205 246 302 506 508 524 591 875 4,947

T 5 6 4 3 2 2 3 3 3 1 2 0 2 0 0 36

% 2.2% 3.2% 2.7% 2% 1.4% 1.4% 1.6% 1.5% 1.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0% 0.4% 0% 0% 0.7%

2

0

0

5

P 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA

A 239 196 158 157 149 156 201 217 265 324 546 562 588 803 NA 4,561

T 7 1 3 3 2 4 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 NA 32

% 2.9% 0.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.3% 2.6% 1% 2.8% 1.5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% NA 0.7%

2

0

0

4

P 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA NA

A 263 208 165 175 159 172 218 262 296 393 644 744 860 NA NA 4,559

T 10 4 1 1 3 3 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 NA NA 29

% 3.8% 1.9% 0.6% 0.6% 1.9% 1.7% 0% 1.1% 0.7% 0.3% 0.2% 0% 0% NA NA 0.6%

2

0

0

3

P 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA NA NA

A 275 223 174 189 173 189 226 290 329 427 764 940 NA NA NA 4,199

T 6 5 8 1 3 3 2 3 1 0 1 0 NA NA NA 33

% 2.2% 2.2% 4.6% 0.5% 1.7% 1.6% 0.9% 1% 0.3% 0% 0.1% 0% NA NA NA 0.8%


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

34

California Bighorn Sheep 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002



Points 42% 34% 52% 58% 71%




Points 224 239 263 275 294


Holders 5 7 10 6 12






Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

35


Changes – Rocky Mountain Bighorn Points/Applicants/Tags by Year

Points Applications Tags

Y * Max -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 Totals

2

0

0

6

P 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA

A 352 199 125 110 192 222 212 408 518 486 581 738 4,143

T 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 5

% 0% 0.5% 0% 0.9% 0% 0$ 0% 0.5% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0.1%

2

0

0

5

P 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA

A 367 206 137 119 196 241 223 446 578 558 761 NA 3,832

T 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA 5

% 0.5% 0% 0% 0.8% 1% 0.% 0.% 0.% 0.% 0.% 0.% NA 0.1%

2

0

0

4

P 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA NA

A 391 221 149 128 222 283 265 533 723 776 NA NA 3,691

T 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 NA NA 6

% 0.5% 0% 1.3% 0.% 0.% 0.% 0.4% 0.% 0.% 0.1% NA NA 0.2%

2

0

0

3

P 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NA NA NA NA

A 411 224 165 138 231 293 289 624 944 NA NA NA 3,319

T 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 NA NA NA 6

% 0.5% 0.4% 0.6% 0.% 0.% 0.3% 0.% 0.2% 0.% NA NA NA 0.2%

% – Success Percentage


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

36

Rocky Mountain

Bighorn Sheep 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002

Percent of Tags to Maximum

Points 0% 40% 33% 33% 100%


Points 20% 40% 66% 66% 100%


Total Applications 8.5% 9.6% 10.6% 12.4% 16%


Points 352 367 391 411 428

Number of Tags to Maximum

Point Holders 0 2 2 2 3


Maximum Points Receiving Tags 0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.7%




Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Committee Motion: Keep bonus point system as is for all

trophy big game animals including deer.

Motion carried.

Rationale: Maximum bonus point holders are more selective

and restrictive in their choices. The committee is concerned

about the number of people who are dropping out after the first

few years of applying.

Fiscal Impact: None.


recommendation.

37




Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

38

The current formula:

Total points for all applicants in the party

Divide by number of applicants in the party

Round up if .50 points or more. I.e., if there are three people in

the party and one has 3 points and two have 4, the total is 11

points. Divide 11 by 3 and you arrive at 3.667 points. This

rounds up to 4 points for the party.

Alternatives:

Rounding down (truncating)

Least number of points in party

Party Bonus Points

Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Bonus Points Potential Application

Changes – Party Bonus Points


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

39


Changes – Party Bonus Points in 2006 by Party Size (Existing Formula)

# in

Party

Bonus Points By Party Size in 2006 Big Game Draw – With Points Rounded Up (Existing Formula)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total

Parties

15 1 1

14 2 2

13 1 1

12 1 1 2

11 1 1 2

10 4 1 1 1 7

9 8 10 2 2 22

8 13 11 5 2 31

7 33 27 5 4 69

6 54 46 25 5 1 1 132

5 142 117 36 11 3 1 310

4 349 246 101 50 16 11 5 1 779

3 853 463 238 93 51 28 5 5 6 1 1,743

2 2,090 1,198 643 369 224 111 43 29 23 9 5 6 1 1 4,752

1 12,832 5,313 3,127 1,959 1,017 445 254 148 87 37 24 10 1 1 1 25,256

Total 16,380 7,437 4,184 2,496 1,312 597 307 183 116 47 29 16 2 1 2 33,109


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

40

Should Party Bonus Points be rounded down instead?

Total points for all applicants in the party

Divide by the number of applicants in the party

Round down “Utah” style. I.e., if there are three people in the

party and one has 3 points and two have 4 the total is 11 points.

Divide 11 by 3 and you arrive at 3.667 points. This rounds

down to 3 points for the party

Party Bonus Points


Changes – Party Bonus Points


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

41


Changes – Party Bonus Points in 2006 with Points Rounded Down

# in

Party

Bonus Points By Party Size in 2006 Big Game Draw – With Points Rounded Down

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total

15 1 1

14 2 2

13 1 1

12 1 1 2

11 1 1 2

10 4 2 1 7

9 15 5 1 1 22

8 18 10 1 2 31

7 47 14 7 1 69

6 84 32 12 2 1 1 132

5 199 73 27 7 4 310

4 477 171 72 29 19 8 3 779

3 1,004 382 199 79 39 24 5 5 5 1 1,743

2 2,491 1,036 503 331 193 93 42 25 21 5 5 6 4,752

1 12,832 5,313 3,127 1,959 1,017 445 254 148 87 37 24 10 1 1 1 25,256

Round↓ 17,174 7,042 3,951 2,411 1,273 571 304 178 113 43 29 16 1 1 1 33,109

Round↑ 16,380 7,437 4,184 2,496 1,312 597 307 183 116 47 29 16 2 1 2


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

42


Changes – Party Bonus Points in 2006 Rounded Down vs. Rounded Up

# in

Party

Bonus Points By Party Size in 2006 Big Game Draw – Comparison of Rounded Up and Down

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total

15 1

14 2

13 1 -1 1

12 2

11 2

10 1 -1 7

9 7 -5 -1 -1 22

8 5 -1 -4 31

7 14 -13 2 -3 69

6 30 -14 -13 -3 132

5 57 -44 -9 -4 1 -1 310

4 128 -75 -29 -21 3 -3 -2 -1 779

3 151 -81 -39 -14 -12 -4 -1 1,743

2 401 -162 -140 -38 -31 -18 -1 -4 -2 -4 -1 4,752

1 25,256

Round↓ 17,174 7,042 3,951 2,411 1,273 571 304 178 113 43 29 16 1 1 2 33,109

Round↑ 16,380 7,437 4,184 2,496 1,312 597 307 183 116 47 29 16 2 1 2 33,109

Change 794 -395 -233 -85 -39 -26 -3 -5 -3 -4 -1


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

43

Should Party Bonus Points be the least number of points

amongst party members?

Consider all applicants in the party

Use the least points of any member in the party. I.e., if you had

three party members and one had no points (zero) and the

other two each had 10 points, then the party would end up with

no points (zero), because the points would be chosen from the

member with the least points

Party Bonus Points


Changes – Party Bonus Points – Least Points in Party


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

44


Changes – Party Bonus Points in 2006 with Least Points in Party

# in

Party

Bonus Points By Party Size in 2006 Big Game Draw (with Least Bonus Points in Party)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total

15 1 1

14 1 1 2

13 1 1

12 2 2

11 2 2

10 6 1 7

9 20 1 1 22

8 24 4 1 2 31

7 56 11 2 69

6 101 22 6 1 1 1 132

5 244 43 16 5 2 310

4 566 110 57 23 17 5 1 779

3 1,159 308 146 62 33 23 4 3 4 1 1,743

2 2,797 890 427 291 167 84 42 21 19 4 6 3 1 4,752

1 12,832 5,313 3,127 1,959 1,017 445 254 148 87 37 24 10 1 1 1 25,256

Total 17,812 6,703 3,783 2,344 1,237 558 301 172 110 42 30 13 1 1 2 33,109


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

45



# in

Party

Bonus Points By Party Size in 2006 Big Game Draw Comparison with Least Bonus Points in Party)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total

15 1 -1 1

14 1 -1 2

13 1 -1 1

12 1 -1 2

11 1 -1 2

10 2 -1 -1 7

9 12 -10 -1 -1 22

8 11 -7 -4 31

7 23 -16 -3 -4 69

6 47 -24 -19 -4 132

5 102 -74 -20 -6 -1 -1 310

4 217 -136 -44 -27 1 -6 -4 -1 779

3 306 -155 -92 -31 -18 -5 -1 -2 -2 1,743

2 707 -308 -216 -78 -57 -27 -1 -8 -4 -5 1 -3 -1 4,752

1 25,256

Round↑ 16,380 7,437 4,184 2,496 1,312 597 307 183 116 47 29 16 2 1 2 33,109

Least 17,812 6,703 3,783 2,344 1,237 558 301 172 110 42 30 13 1 1 2 33,109

Diff 1,432 -734 -401 -152 -75 -39 -6 -11 -6 -5 1 -3 -1


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Committee Motion: Keep party bonus point system as is for

deer (average points rounded up).

Motion carried.

Rationale: There isn’t a significant difference between rounding

up, down or going with the least number of points in the party.



recommendation.

46




Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

47

The current formula:

Points are not considered in terms of age

There is a Junior Hunt with set aside quota but no Senior Hunt

counterpart

Alternatives:

Offer some advantage to seniors with points, i.e., a preference

ahead of other bonus point holders

Senior Bonus Points (High Points/High Age Advantage)


Changes – Senior Bonus Points


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


Senior Bonus Point Advantage

1331, 1341, 1371 Resident Senior Bonus Points going into 2007

Age 1 pt 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts 6 pts 7 pts 8 pts 9 pts Total

50-54 1,410 723 344 147 55 12 6 1 1 2,699

55-59 1,171 553 261 115 48 15 3 5 1 2,172

60-64 968 434 204 104 25 12 5 2 2 1,756

65-69 661 362 162 71 22 7 3 1 1 1,290

70-74 376 194 100 50 12 2 1 1 736

75-79 193 90 48 22 3 5 1 1 363

80-84 88 36 21 6 1 2 1 1 156

85-89 34 19 3 4 3 2 65

90-94 4 3 1 1 9

Totals 4,905 2,414 1,144 520 169 57 20 11 6 9,246

48


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Committee Motion: Seniors will not be afforded any additional

advantage.

Motion carried.

Rationale: Seniors have had more opportunities in their lifetime

to harvest big game than has a sportsman just entering the

system.



recommendation.

49


Senior Bonus Point Advantage


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Preference was for resident deer rifle and muzzleloader applicants

only—to be used for the same hunt the following year

Preference applications were processed prior to non-preference

applications in the drawing

How many units were filled with preferential applicants?

In 1990 there were 15 hunter choices filled by preferential

applicants—37% of the hunter choices

Preferential units groups: 011-013, 014, 015, 021, 022, 031, 032, 033, 034,

035, 131-134, 192, 194 and 196, 195, 291

In 1991 there were 19 hunter choices filled by preferential

applicants—47% of the hunter choices

Preferential units groups: 011-013, 014, 015, 021, 022, 031, 032, 033,

034, 035, 041 an 042, 081, 192, 194 and 196, 195, 221-223, 231, 241-

244, 291

NOTE: Hunter choices that filled with preference applicants became units that had quota assigned to the archery deer hunt the

following year.

History of Preferential System

History of Old Preferential System

50


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

51

Let’s adopt some terminology …

With the old NDOW Deer Preferential System, all individuals who

had been unsuccessful in the previous year had “preference” over

those who did not

No additional weight was given to someone who had been

unsuccessful more than one time consecutively

Someone who had been unsuccessful three years in a row was

treated the same as someone who had been successful only in the

most recent year

Let’s call this type of preferential system a “True” preferential

system

“True” vs. “Tiered” Preferential System:


“True” Preferential System vs. “Tiered” Preferential System”


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

52

Continuing with terminology …

With the Utah (and several other state preferential systems), all

individuals who had been unsuccessful in the previous year have

“Preference” over those who did not

Additional weight is given to someone who had been unsuccessful

more than one time consecutively

Individuals with the most preference points are considered first. If

there are tags left over, those with the next most points are

considered, and so forth

Let’s call this type of preferential system a “Tiered” preferential

system

“True” vs. “Tiered” Preferential System:




Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Appl # Bon Pts Draw #

0001 3 002700413

0002 0 000009023

0003 1 000803910

0004 4 001060250

0005 0 098013056

0006 10 000006055

0007 1 080725860

0008 0 010345603

0009 0 054026407

0010 2 002350709



Consider 10 applications with the following bonus points:

53


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Appl # Bon Pts Pref Draw #

0001 3 002700413

0002 0 000009023

0003 1 000803910

0004 4 001060250

0005 0 098013056

0006 10 000006055

0007 1 080725860

0008 0 010345603

0009 0 054026407

0010 2 002350709



Let’s add a column to indicate “Preference”:

54

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

0

0

1


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


0001 3 1 002700413

0002 0 0 000009023

0003 1 1 000803910

0004 4 1 001060250

0005 0 0 098013056

0006 10 1 000006055

0007 1 1 080725860

0008 0 0 010345603

0009 0 0 054026407

0010 2 1 002350709

Appl # Pref Draw #

0006 1 000006055

0002 0 000009023

0003 1 000803910

0004 1 001060250

0010 1 002350709

0001 1 002700413

0008 0 010345603

0009 0 054026407

0007 1 080725860

0005 0 098013056



In the current system, apps are sorted strictly by Draw #

55


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


0001 3 1 002700413

0002 0 0 000009023

0003 1 1 000803910

0004 4 1 001060250

0005 0 0 098013056

0006 10 1 000006055

0007 1 1 080725860

0008 0 0 010345603

0009 0 0 054026407

0010 2 1 002350709

Appl # Pref Draw #

0006 1 000006055

0003 1 000803910

0004 1 001060250

0010 1 002350709

0001 1 002700413

0007 1 080725860

0002 0 000009023

0008 0 010345603

0009 0 054026407

0005 0 098013056



In a “True” preferential system, apps are sorted by Pref & Draw #

56


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


0001 3 1 002700413

0002 0 0 000009023

0003 1 1 000803910

0004 4 1 001060250

0005 0 0 098013056

0006 10 1 000006055

0007 1 1 080725860

0008 0 0 010345603

0009 0 0 054026407

0010 2 1 002350709

Appl # Pts Draw #

0006 10 000006055

0004 4 001060250

0001 3 002700413

0010 2 002350709

0003 1 000803910

0007 1 080725860

0002 0 000009023

0008 0 010345603

0009 0 054026407

0005 0 098013056



In a “Tiered” preferential system, apps are sorted by Pts & Draw #

57


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


0001 3 1 002700413

0002 0 0 000009023

0003 1 1 000803910

0004 4 1 001060250

0005 0 0 098013056

0006 10 1 000006055

0007 1 1 080725860

0008 0 0 010345603

0009 0 0 054026407

0010 2 1 002350709

“Now” “True” “Tiered”

Appl # Appl # Appl #

0006 0006 0006

0002 0003 0004

0003 0004 0001

0004 0010 0010

0010 0001 0003

0001 0007 0007

0008 0002 0002

0009 0008 0008

0007 0009 0009

0005 0005 0005


“True” Preferential System vs. “Tiered” Preferential System

Here is a comparison of the 3 types:

58


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

59

We took the applications for deer in 2006 …

We assigned a “preference” of 1 for any application/party with

bonus points (no matter how many bonus points)

We assigned a “preference” of 0 for any application/party with no

bonus points

We re-allocated tags by considering all with a “preference” first

(sorted by draw number), followed by all with no “preference”

(sorted by draw number)

Simulated “True” Preferential System Draw:


Simulated “True” Preferential System Draw for 2006


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


“True” Preferential System 2006 Simulated 1331 Draw Results


60

Choice Description Res

Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Pref Tags

Res Non

Pref Tags

NonRes

Pref Tags

NonRes

Non Pref Tags

624 UNITS 011-013 154 8 154 8

625 UNIT 014 58 5 58 5

626 UNIT 015 36 2 36 2

627 UNIT 021 28 2 28 2

628 UNIT 022 49 3 49 3

629 UNIT 031 111 6 111 6

630 UNIT 032 89 7 89 7

631 UNIT 033 EARLY 74 5 74 5

632 UNIT 033 LATE 74 5 74 5

633 UNIT 034 18 2 18 2

634 UNIT 035 48 3 48 3

635 UNITS 041, 042 51 3 51 3

636 UNITS 043 - 046 172 10 172 10

637 UNIT 051 371 35 371 35

638 UNITS 061, 062, 064, 066 - 068 EARLY 769 44 769 44

639 UNITS 061, 062, 064, 066 - 068 LATE 85 5 85 5

640 UNIT 065 31 2 31 2

641 UNITS 071 - 079 849 51 849 51

642 UNIT 081 44 3 44 3

643 UNITS 101 - 108 EARLY 1,717 122 1,375 342 122

644 UNITS 101 - 108 LATE 429 31 429 31

645 UNITS 111 - 113 EARLY 789 52 789 52

Closed to Non-Preference Open


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


61


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Pref Tags

Res Non

Pref Tags

NonRes

Pref Tags

NonRes

Non Pref Tags

646 UNITS 111 - 113 LATE 58 4 58 4

647 UNITS 114, 115 158 10 158 10

648 UNIT 121 165 7 165 7

649 UNITS 131 - 134 263 15 263 15

650 UNITS 141 - 145 331 26 331 26

651 UNITS 151, 152, 154, 155 158 9 158 9

652 UNITS 161 - 164 256 10 256 10

653 UNITS 171 - 173 522 38 522 38

654 UNITS 181 - 184 172 12 172 12

655 UNIT 192 33 3 33 3

656 UNITS 194, 196 53 4 53 4

657 UNIT 195 32 3 32 3

658 UNITS 201, 204 74 8 74 8

659 UNITS 202, 205, 206 57 3 57 3

660 UNIT 203 SPECIAL WEAPON 73 7 73 7

661 UNITS 211, 212 37 2 37 2

662 UNITS 221 - 223 373 23 373 23

663 UNIT 231 167 12 167 12

664 UNITS 241 - 245 41 2 41 2

665 UNITS 251 - 253 45 5 45 5

666 UNITS 261 - 268 55 6 55 6

667 UNITS 271, 272 18 2 18 2



Open Closed to Non-Preference


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006




62


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Pref Tags

Res Non

Pref Tags

NonRes

Pref Tags

NonRes

Non Pref Tags

709 UNITS 011-013 37 4 37 4

710 UNIT 014 14 2 14 2

711 UNIT 015 3 2 3 2

712 UNIT 021 10 2 10 2

713 UNIT 022 14 2 14 2

714 UNIT 031 25 3 12 13 3

715 UNIT 032 16 2 3 13 2

716 UNIT 033 23 3 23 3

717 UNIT 034 6 2 4 2 2

718 UNIT 035 17 2 6 11 2

719 UNITS 041, 042 17 2 5 12 1 1

720 UNITS 043 - 046 59 7 7 52 1

721 UNIT 051 85 9 9 60 4 5

722 UNITS 061, 062, 064, 066 - 068 249 26 25 188 15 11

723 UNIT 065 21 2 2 19 1 1

724 UNITS 071 - 079 133 13 22 96 9 4

725 UNIT 081 4 2 0 2 1 1

726 UNITS 101 - 108 EARLY 595 55 18 210 15 40

727 UNITS 101 - 108 LATE 149 14 43 106 14

728 UNITS 111 - 113 69 8 37 32 8

729 UNITS 114, 115 105 12 10 95 12



Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


63


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Pref Tags

Res Non

Pref Tags

NonRes

Pref Tags

NonRes

Non Pref Tags

730 UNIT 121 31 3 10 21 1 2

731 UNITS 131 - 134 41 5 41 5

732 UNITS 141 - 145 84 9 7 77 2 7

733 UNITS 151, 152, 154, 155 80 9 7 70 1 8

734 UNITS 161 - 164 106 12 31 75 6 6

735 UNITS 171 - 173 229 25 14 185 10 15

736 UNITS 181 - 184 47 5 39 1 2

737 UNIT 192 23 3 12 11 1 1

738 UNITS 194, 196 10 2 10 2

739 UNIT 195 10 2 10 2

740 UNITS 201, 204 32 4 15 17 4

741 UNITS 202, 205, 206 10 2 3 7 1 1

742 UNIT 203 34 4 9 25 4

743 UNITS 211, 212 24 3 1 6 3

744 UNITS 221 - 223 73 8 53 20 8

745 UNIT 231 44 5 44 5

746 UNITS 241 - 245 16 2 15 1 2

747 UNITS 251 - 253 5 2 2 3

748 UNITS 261 - 268 16 2 16

749 UNITS 271, 272 4 2 3 1 2

750 UNIT 291 17 2 17 1 1





Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006




64


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Pref Tags

Res Non

Pref Tags

NonRes

Pref Tags

NonRes

Non Pref Tags

669 UNITS 011-013 14 2 14 2

670 UNIT 014 6 2 6 2

671 UNIT 015 2 2 2 2

672 UNIT 021 3 2 3 2

673 UNIT 022 4 2 4 2

674 UNIT 031 7 2 7 2

675 UNIT 032 5 2 5 2

676 UNIT 033 31 2 31 3

677 UNIT 034 8 2 8 2

678 UNIT 035 6 2 6 2

679 UNITS 041, 042 5 2 5 2

680 UNITS 043 - 046 30 3 30 1

681 UNIT 051 37 4 27 10 4

682 UNITS 061, 062, 064, 066 - 068 76 3 76 3

683 UNIT 065 4 2 4 2

684 UNITS 071 - 079 118 4 87 31 4

685 UNIT 081 4 2 4 2

686 UNITS 101 - 108 180 9 104 76 9

687 UNITS 111 - 113 49 3 49 3

688 UNITS 114, 115 94 10 94 10

689 UNIT 121 16 2 16 2



Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


65


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Pref Tags

Res Non

Pref Tags

NonRes

Pref Tags

NonRes

Non Pref Tags

690 UNITS 131 - 134 33 4 33 4

691 UNITS 141 - 145 14 2 14 2

692 UNITS 151, 152, 154, 155 23 3 23 3

693 UNITS 161 - 164 28 3 28 3

694 UNITS 171 - 173 94 4 94 4

695 UNITS 181 - 184 8 2 8 1 1

696 UNIT 192 4 2 4 2

697 UNITS 194, 196 2 2 2 2

698 UNIT 195 5 2 5 2

699 UNITS 201, 204 4 2 4 2

700 UNITS 202, 205, 206 4 2 4 2

701 UNITS 211, 212 13 2 4 9 2

702 UNITS 221 - 223 25 3 25 3

703 UNIT 231 17 2 17 2

704 UNITS 241 - 245 3 2 3 2

705 UNITS 251 - 253 6 2 6 1 1

706 UNITS 261 - 268 7 2 7 1 1

707 UNITS 271, 272 2 2 2 2

708 UNIT 291 4 2 4 1 1





Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006


“Tiered” Preferential System 2006 Simulated 1331 Draw Results

66


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Tags

NonRes

Tags

Min Pts

To Draw

624 UNITS 011-013 154 8 154 8 4

625 UNIT 014 58 5 58 5 4

626 UNIT 015 36 2 36 2 4

627 UNIT 021 28 2 28 2 4

628 UNIT 022 49 3 49 3 3

629 UNIT 031 111 6 111 6 3

630 UNIT 032 89 7 89 7 2

631 UNIT 033 EARLY 74 5 74 5 3

632 UNIT 033 LATE 74 5 74 5 4

633 UNIT 034 18 2 18 2 3

634 UNIT 035 48 3 48 3 2

635 UNITS 041, 042 51 3 51 3 3

636 UNITS 043 - 046 172 10 172 10 2

637 UNIT 051 371 35 371 35 1

638 UNITS 061, 062, 064, 066 - 068 EARLY 769 44 769 44 1

639 UNITS 061, 062, 064, 066 - 068 LATE 85 5 85 5 3

640 UNIT 065 31 2 31 2 3

641 UNITS 071 - 079 849 51 849 51 1

642 UNIT 081 44 3 44 3 2

643 UNITS 101 - 108 EARLY 1,717 122 1,375 122 0

644 UNITS 101 - 108 LATE 429 31 429 31 1

645 UNITS 111 - 113 EARLY 789 52 789 52 1

Open Closed to those with “0” pts


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

67


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Tags

Non Res

Tags

Min Pts

To Draw

646 UNITS 111 - 113 LATE 58 4 58 4 3

647 UNITS 114, 115 158 10 158 10 2

648 UNIT 121 165 7 165 7 1

649 UNITS 131 - 134 263 15 263 15 2

650 UNITS 141 - 145 331 26 331 26 1

651 UNITS 151, 152, 154, 155 158 9 158 9 2

652 UNITS 161 - 164 256 10 256 10 2

653 UNITS 171 - 173 522 38 522 38 1

654 UNITS 181 - 184 172 12 172 12 1

655 UNIT 192 33 3 33 3 3

656 UNITS 194, 196 53 4 53 4 5

657 UNIT 195 32 3 32 3 4

658 UNITS 201, 204 74 8 74 8 3

659 UNITS 202, 205, 206 57 3 57 3 2

660 UNIT 203 SPECIAL WEAPON 73 7 73 7 1

661 UNITS 211, 212 37 2 37 2 1

662 UNITS 221 - 223 373 23 373 23 2

663 UNIT 231 167 12 167 12 3

664 UNITS 241 - 245 41 2 41 2 4

665 UNITS 251 - 253 45 5 45 5

666 UNITS 261 - 268 55 6 55 6

667 UNITS 271, 272 18 2 18 2

668 UNIT 291 42 5 42 5 3





Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006



68


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Tags

Non Res

Tags

Min Pts

To Draw

709 UNITS 011-013 37 4 37 4 1

710 UNIT 014 14 2 14 2 1

711 UNIT 015 3 2 3 2 2

712 UNIT 021 10 2 10 2 1

713 UNIT 022 14 2 14 2 1

714 UNIT 031 25 3 12 3 0

715 UNIT 032 16 2 3 2 0

716 UNIT 033 23 3 23 3 1

717 UNIT 034 6 2 4 2 0

718 UNIT 035 17 2 6 0

719 UNITS 041, 042 17 2 5 1 0

720 UNITS 043 - 046 59 7 7 1 0

721 UNIT 051 85 9 9 4 0

722 UNITS 061, 062, 064, 066 - 068 249 26 25 15 0

723 UNIT 065 21 2 2 1 0

724 UNITS 071 - 079 133 13 22 9 0

725 UNIT 081 4 2 0 1 0

726 UNITS 101 - 108 EARLY 595 55 18 15 0

727 UNITS 101 - 108 LATE 149 14 43 14 0

728 UNITS 111 - 113 69 8 37 8 0

729 UNITS 114, 115 105 12 10 12 0



Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

69


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Tags

NonRes

Tags

Min Pts

To Draw

730 UNIT 121 31 3 10 1 0

731 UNITS 131 - 134 41 5 41 5 1

732 UNITS 141 - 145 84 9 7 2 0

733 UNITS 151, 152, 154, 155 80 9 7 1 0

734 UNITS 161 - 164 106 12 31 6 0

735 UNITS 171 - 173 229 25 14 10 0

736 UNITS 181 - 184 47 5 1 0

737 UNIT 192 23 3 12 1 0

738 UNITS 194, 196 10 2 10 2 2

739 UNIT 195 10 2 10 0

740 UNITS 201, 204 32 4 15 4 0

741 UNITS 202, 205, 206 10 2 3 1 0

742 UNIT 203 34 4 9 0

743 UNITS 211, 212 24 3 1 0

744 UNITS 221 - 223 73 8 53 8 0

745 UNIT 231 44 5 44 5 0

746 UNITS 241 - 245 16 2 15 2 0

747 UNITS 251 - 253 5 2 2 0

748 UNITS 261 - 268 16 2 16 0

749 UNITS 271, 272 4 2 3 0

750 UNIT 291 17 2 17 1 0





Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006



70


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Tags

NonRes

Tags

Min Pts

To Draw

669 UNITS 011-013 14 2 14 2 2

670 UNIT 014 6 2 6 2 3

671 UNIT 015 2 2 2 2 4

672 UNIT 021 3 2 3 2 3

673 UNIT 022 4 2 4 2 2

674 UNIT 031 7 2 7 2 2

675 UNIT 032 5 2 5 2 1

676 UNIT 033 31 2 31 3 3

677 UNIT 034 8 2 8 2 1

678 UNIT 035 6 2 6 2 1

679 UNITS 041, 042 5 2 5 0

680 UNITS 043 - 046 30 3 30 1 1

681 UNIT 051 37 4 27 4 0

682 UNITS 061, 062, 064, 066 - 068 76 3 76 3 1

683 UNIT 065 4 2 4 2 2

684 UNITS 071 - 079 118 4 87 4 0

685 UNIT 081 4 2 4 2 1

686 UNITS 101 - 108 180 9 104 9 0

687 UNITS 111 - 113 49 3 49 3 1

688 UNITS 114, 115 94 10 94 10 2

689 UNIT 121 16 2 16 2 1



Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

71


Quota

NonRes

Quota

Res

Tags

NonRes

Tags

Min Pts

To Draw

690 UNITS 131 - 134 33 4 33 4 2

691 UNITS 141 - 145 14 2 14 2 1

692 UNITS 151, 152, 154, 155 23 3 23 3 1

693 UNITS 161 - 164 28 3 28 3 1

694 UNITS 171 - 173 94 4 94 4 1

695 UNITS 181 - 184 8 2 8 1 0

696 UNIT 192 4 2 4 2 1

697 UNITS 194, 196 2 2 2 2 2

698 UNIT 195 5 2 5 2 1

699 UNITS 201, 204 4 2 4 2 2

700 UNITS 202, 205, 206 4 2 4 2 1

701 UNITS 211, 212 13 2 4 2 0

702 UNITS 221 - 223 25 3 25 3 2

703 UNIT 231 17 2 17 2 3

704 UNITS 241 - 245 3 2 3 2 4

705 UNITS 251 - 253 6 2 6 1 0

706 UNITS 261 - 268 7 2 7 1 0

707 UNITS 271, 272 2 2 2 2 2

708 UNIT 291 4 2 4 1 0





Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

Committee Motion: Leave the system as is, do not adopt either

a “true” or “tiered” preferential system.

Motion carried.

Rationale: There is already a hunter retention problem. By

closing units to sportsman without preference points it will

impact retention and revenues (license sales).



recommendation.

72


“True” or “Tiered” Preferential System


Nevada

Board of

Wildlife

Tag

Allocation

and

Application

Hunt


August 2006

73

Documents

Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners · Youth Hunters Born in 1994, applying in 2006-2011: Tag Allocation and Application Topics – Youth Hunts – Late DOBs 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr