Upload
meir
View
30
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Networks and Organizations. Aaron McKenny. Agenda. Authors Networks Major Uses Networks in different organizational lifecycle phases Conclusion. Authors. Kelly Packalen (Maiden name: Porter) Assistant Professor of Strategy and Organization Queens University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONSAaron McKenny
Agenda Authors Networks Major Uses Networks in different organizational
lifecycle phases Conclusion
Authors Kelly Packalen (Maiden name: Porter)
Assistant Professor of Strategy and Organization
Queens University Entrepreneurship, Strategy, OT Especially career histories of founders
Walter Powell Professor of Sociology Stanford University Networks
Agenda Authors Networks Major Uses Networks in different organizational
lifecycle phases Conclusion
Network… a broad word “Networking” – in a business sense Internal vs external networks Nodes = individuals, organizations IT definition
Two types of network studies Networks as tools to trace relationships Networks as a governance structure
Networks play different roles in different stages of the organizational lifecycle
Important things not introduced Closure – The redundancy of ties in a
network Centrality – Your importance in a network
(most simple: number of ties you have to others)
Centralization – Degree to which the middle of the network is dominated by one or few nodes.
Agenda Authors Networks Major Uses
As a tool for tracing relationships As a governance structure
Networks in different organizational lifecycle phases
Conclusion
As a tool for tracing relationships
Roots in sociology, social psychology Webs of affiliation
Moreno (1934) developed the social network map (sociogram)
Use in investigating socialcircles Formal circle membership Informal circle membership
As a tool for tracing relationships
Balance Theory Need to maintain an equilibrium of relations
A & B positively linked Only in balance if they agree in their other links (vice versa for negatively linked pairs)
Small Worlds http://oracleofbacon.org/ Two random people are not so distantly
connected as we tend to think.
As a tool for tracing relationships
The Strength of Weak Ties You generally share common information with
strong ties Weak ties have more information that is less familiar
to you (more informative) Bridging relationship – ties two otherwise
disconnected (or weakly connected) subnetworks Many advantages to this: promotion, compensation,
etc. (Burt, 2000) Structural holes – what you have when there’s no
bridging relationship, two subnetworks that aren’t linked
As Governance Structures Markets vs hierarchies (Ollie W)
…vs. networks (Powell, 1990) Market
Goods exchanged based on price – prototypical neoclassical economics supply & demand curve
Hierarchy Employment relationship (rules-based) Management costs < Market transaction costs
Networks Relationship-based (friendship, obligation, trust) Benefits of small, agile businesses while still attaining
economies of scale
Four types of network governance
Centered around projects Firm-led industrial districts (meta
organizing?) Geographical clustering of industries Strategic networking
Outsourcing Joint Ventures Strategic Alliances
Agenda Authors Networks Major Uses Networks in different organizational
lifecycle phases New Ventures Growth Maturity and Decline
Conclusion
What to expect Differences
Types of networks leveraged Formal vs. Informal
Level of networks leveraged Internal vs. external
Roles of the network Embeddedness in network
Relational – use direct ties to get information Structural – Value derived from holding a
position in the network
In new ventures Network of founders is the firm’s
network A conduit for resources
Wealth, Power, Legitimacy, Information Use network to gather advice
Gain support and test business ideas Start network small, grow it in the planning
phase, shrink it in the establishment phase Frequently use family
Also venture capitalists, angel investors
In new ventures Money
Most entrepreneurs supplement their own investments with others
Family, Friends, VCs, Angels, SBA, etc Immigrant Entrepreneurs
Often discriminated against by traditional funding sources
Some use revolving credit associations instead Socially very important for them to repay loans
Others are more creative Revolving credit associations have a bunch of negative
side-effects
In new ventures Reputation
Helps establish legitimacy, access to favorable capital sources (and not just financial capital)
Investors use to gather information about you too Can affect IPO valuation
Favored at Birth Tend to expand the same social network, not
establish a brand new one when starting a venture Relationships based on one of three components
Personal embeddedness (social, not work connection) Competency embeddedness (known, reliable party) Hollow embeddedness (based on reputation/3rd party
ties)
Growth Phase Connections to external resources
facilitates growth Internal Networks
Influences flow of information Moderate levels of internal socialization is
optimal Contrary to team-building studies findings
Networks Across Divisions Dense (internal and external) networks more
productive Weak ties helps in search for knowledge, but
not in transfer of knowledge.
Growth Phase Networks Across Divisions (cont’d)
Social network influences how well you receive change
Capturing Knowledge Hiring – Bring in someone that will bring in new
knowledge Foreign Expansion – Locate your R&D organization
in information-rich locations Acquire rather than establish
Informal Networks – Water cooler hierarchies Important for knowledge sharing Organizations can still be nodes in an informal network
Growth Phase Creating Inter-firm networks as a source of
knowledge Joint projects (research, product development) Having relationships with too few established
firms gives them power over you Smaller firms tend to get more knowledge out
of networks than larger firms Dyads and beyond
Dyads are the most common They use Toyota as an example… maybe they had
better rethink that example.
Growth Phase Location, Location, Location
Real Estate, Marketing, and Networks Organizations develop routines that embed
them in their regions Certain regions have more opportunity than
others But after the ‘gold rush’ to the region, they’re less
attractive Likewise, having other similar companies
around can be helpful But too many can be detrimental
Growth Phase Limits to knowledge sharing
Differences among organizations’ information processing abilities Based on level of prior related knowledge
Differences in willingness of individuals to share information Based on social cohesion and dissimilarity of
knowledge pools. Access to knowledge conditioned by
Structural position in network Prior level of knowledge.
Maturity and Decline New longitudinal databases to help study this Survivability increases at bridging points
between networks Very few studies on dissolution of ties
Hard to get data on this (most companies don’t announce it)
Clique stability Exchanges built on social attraction Identify complementary skills to accomplish
collaborative tasks Distribution of value throughout the clique.
Agenda Authors Networks Major Uses Networks in different organizational
lifecycle phases New Ventures Growth Maturity and Decline
Conclusion
Conclusion Very very brief overview of the literature
Other more extensive reviews: Marsden (1990): Network Data and Measurement – ARS Marsden (2004): Network Analysis – Encyclopaedia of social
measurement Scott (1991): Social Network Analysis: A Handbook Wasserman & Faust (1994): Social Network Analysis: Methods
and Applications Portes (1998): Social Capital: Its origins and applications in
modern sociology – ARS Burt (2000): The Network Structure of Social Capital –
Research in Organizational Behavior Smith-Doerr & Powell (2005): Networks and Economic Life –
Handbook of economic sociology
Big OT Questions Why do organizations exist? Why are firms the same/different? What causes changes in organizations? Why do some firms survive and others
don’t? Emerging issue?