9
Network Security and the New Boeing 787 An Overview of the Common Core Fiber Network and Its Security Risks Nathanael B. Frank

Network Security and the New Boeing 787...Network Security and the New Boeing 787 An Overview of the Common Core Fiber Network and Its Security Risks Nathanael B. Frank Unlike other

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Network Security and the New Boeing 787An Overview of the Common Core Fiber Network and Its Security Risks

    Nathanael B. Frank

  • The “Dreamliner”

    • Built for:• Flexibility• Profitability• Sustainability • Comfort

    http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787/

    PresenterPresentation NotesUnlike other aircraft builds, where the focus has been power or size, in building the Dreamliner, Boeing had different focuses:Flexibility, Profitability, Sustainability, and Passenger Comfort. Boeing used scientific research to create, as they put it a “super-efficient family of commercial airplanes”. Using cutting edge materials and technology, such as carbon composites, as opposed to aluminum, and enhanced networking technologies; the Dreamliner family can fly farther, on less fuel; allowing airlines to open routes that may have previously been unprofitable, or un available. This has been a big shift from other new aircraft such as the Airbus A380, where the focus has been on moving more people.

  • The Common Core System• Electronics and Software Backbone• Shared Between Avionics and

    Passenger Comfort Systems

    https://www.stellarnet.us/systems/fiber-optic-spectrum-analyzers/

    PresenterPresentation NotesA major shift in the aviation industry has occurred as there has been an increase in both “fly-by-wire” glass cockpits, and more widely available and advanced in-flight entertainment systems. \In older aircraft, in-flight entertainment is a retrofit process. Networks, such as “GoGo In-Flight” are added to an aircraft rather than built inNewer aircraft such as the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, as well as the Airbus A350 and A380 rely on an internal network to support avionics systems, and have in-flight entertainment and wi-fi sharing the same core.

  • System Benefits• AFDX:

    • Increased Avionics Communication Speeds

    • More than 100 Mb/s • Full Duplex

    • Decreased Weight, Greater Efficiency • Less Cabling

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_cockpit

    PresenterPresentation NotesKnown as Avionics Full Duplex, AFDX is the base technology behind the 787 common core. AFDX is governed by two standards, IEEE 802.3 and ARINC 664 Part 7. The entire IEEE 802 standard governs Ethernet communication, and 802.3 governs an array of standards in the physical and datalink layers of wired Ethernet networks. Previous systems relied on a single pair connection to each of the various avionics devices and was not “switched” This architecture resulted in Slower communications speeds from avionics nodes as a single twisted pair can only function as half-duplexExtra cabling, as each device required its own twisted pair.Switching to the AFDX increases avionics data speeds by allowing for full duplex communicationsIn the case of the 787, this is even faster, with the use of fiber optic technologyThe system also provides significant weight reductions as less cable is needed to implement the switched network

  • Security Risks

    • Shared Network• Firewall Only Separation

    • No “Air Gap”• Critical Systems Vulnerable

    • Onboard Hacker• Passenger Downloaded Malware• Internet Based Threats

    PresenterPresentation NotesThere are security risks associated with this type of shared network:The passenger entertainment side of the network is protected from the critical systems side of the network by only a firewall.While not necessarily “easily” defeated, firewall systems are not infallible, meaning a passenger could conceivably by-pas the firewall and gain access to critical avionics systems. Experts have suggested that in order to properly provide security to these systems, that the two sides should have an “Air Gap” meaning that the passenger side, and the avionics side would actually be two physically separate networks. This would however require that the aircraft have two separated internet connections either via air-to-ground or satellite technologies. While this method would protect against an on-board hacker, as well as against passenger downloaded malware, it would not protect against internet based threats.

  • Internet Based Threats• Malware• Hacking

    Affected Systems:• Navigation

    • NextGen Air Traffic Control• Communication• Network Based Controls

    https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/snapshots/stories/?slide=35

    PresenterPresentation NotesBy being connected to the internet, an aircraft is immediately vulnerable to a wide variety of internet based threats, such as malware and hackingJust like any computer, like the ones at home and work, a networked aircraft can be attached by viruses and hackers through its network connections. With the rise of the FAA’s NextGen Air Traffic Control system, there is a rise in networked communication between the ground and aircraft. The Government Accountability Office has found that there are serious risks associated with the NextGen communication system that need to be addressed. One of these risks is the need to protect aircraft avionics systems. The GAO stated in an April 2015 reports: “Modern aircraft are increasingly connected to the Internet. This interconnectedness can potentially provide unauthorized remote access to aircraft avionics systems.”

  • Security Solutions• Advanced Network Partitioning • Pilot Physical Overrides• More FAA Oversight

    PresenterPresentation NotesTo help reduce the threats by using the common core network, Boeing has implemented a couple of solutions. The first solution the Boeing is using is a software platform that allows for a sophisticated partitioning of devices. This software will help to bind the control of avionics devices and their embedded software to a secure environment. The second solution is that Boeing has included in the 787 platform, a manual pilot override system. This system is meant to ensure that even if an intruder were to gain access to the avionics systems, the pilots would be able to override the electronics and maintain control of the aircraft. Additionally, as more and more mass transportation vehicles, like planes and trains are becoming network connected, the GAO has directed the Federal Department of Transportation, and consequentially the FAA, to develop cybersecurity certification criteria to ensure that aircraft remain safe, not only from the people on board, or the elements, but also people in cyberspace.

  • Summary• Boeing 787 Common Core combines

    avionics and passenger networks• This systems provides network speed

    and overall efficiency benefits• Combined networks carry risks from

    intrusion and malware• Boeing uses advanced software and

    pilot overrides to create a safe airframe in spite of these risks.

    http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787/

    PresenterPresentation NotesThe Boeing 787 is one of the world’s most efficient airframes, opening up airlines to greater profits, more flexibility; all while preserving passenger comfort.In building the 787, Boeing implemented a common network, known as the Common Core, that provides data access to safety critical avionics systems, and passenger entertainment systems.While this network provides efficiency benefits it creates some security risks, by creating a potential for a hacker or malware to gain access and control of avionics systems To combat these threats, Boeing worked with industry leading firms to implement sophisticated software and systems that securely separate avionics and passenger systems. Additionally, as this trend continues, there is pressure mounting on the Federal government to implement cybersecurity certification standards, to protect not just aircraft but other transportation types like rail.Despite all of the risks, Boeing has developed a state-of-the-art, efficient, and safe airframe, that will change the aviation horizon for years to come.

  • RefferencesAdaCore. (n.d.). Wind River Teams with AdaCore on Safety-Critical ARINC 653 for use in Boeing 7E7. Retrieved from http://www.adacore.com/customers/787-dreamliner-common-core-system/Boeing Corporation. (2017). 787 Dreamliner By Design. Retrieved from http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787/by-designGogo LLC. (n.d.). History. Retrieved from Gogo: https://www.gogoair.com/historyGovernment Accountabiliy Office. (2015, 04). FAA Needs a More Comprehensive Approach to Address Cybersecurity As Agency Transitions to NextGen. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/669627.pdfMcHale, J. (2005, 4 1). AFDX technology to improve communications on Boeing 787. Retrieved from Military EAerospace: http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/print/volume-16/issue-4/news/afdx-technology-to-improve-communications-on-boeing-787.htmlZetter, K. (2015, 4 15). Hackers Could Commandeer New Planes Through Passenger Wi-Fi. Retrieved from Wired: https://www.wired.com/2015/04/hackers-commandeer-new-planes-passenger-wi-fi/

    Network Security and the New Boeing 787The “Dreamliner”The Common Core SystemSystem BenefitsSecurity RisksInternet Based ThreatsSecurity SolutionsSummaryRefferences