Network Performance Overview 12111 Final

7/31/2019 Network Performance Overview 12111 Final

1/11

2010-11 Network Accountability Overview


2/11

Overall Scoring StructureNetwork ratings are based on four components*:

15%

Quality Review

20%

Progress Report45%

etwor s support ng sc oo s w t g nee stu ent popu at ons are e g e or a t ona cre t aseon qualitative performance

2


3/11

2010-2011 Progress Report (45%)The 2010-11 Progress Report percentile of all schools in the network is

averaged and peered relative to other networks supporting schools serving

student populations of similar need.

For school types without published percentiles, percentiles are calculated

for use in the network ratings.

For schools with more than one Progress Report, the average of the twopercentiles is used.

School attribution to networks is as of 10/31/10.

3


4/11

Most Recent Quality Review (20%)The most recent Quality Review score of all schools in the network is

averaged and peered relative to other networks supporting schools with

similar student populations.

For 2010-2011 Quality Reviews, the published numeric score is used.

For Quality Reviews prior to 2010-11, the Quality Review ratings are

converted to scores using the below table:

WD/O 75P 65UPF 45U 25

School attribution to networks as of 10/31/10.

4


5/11

PeeringProgress Report percentiles and Quality Review scores are incorporated as

peer-horizoned scores, which compares each network to networks supporting

schools serving student populations with similar need, similar to peering on

the Progress Report.

Each network has from 15 to 30 peer networks. Peer networks are those with

similar types of students, determined by the peer index of each school. Each

network has up to 15 peer networks with peer indices above and 15 peerne wor s w peer n ces e ow .

Elementary and K-8 school need is calculated using student demographics; for

other school types, need is based on student proficiency when entering the school

,in the high school index.

Just as Progress Report scores are converted to percentiles and averaged for a

5

,

school type and averaged to determine a network peer index value.


6/11

Peering MethodologyPeering generates a score that expresses how well a network did relative to

networks serving student populations with similar levels of need.

This networkspeered score

63%

. ..

This networksAverage within Average within-

two standarddeviations

two standard

deviations

6Note: Peer horizons and peered scores are limited to the natural range from 0% to 100%.


7/11

Qualitative Evaluation (20%)Each network receives a score from 1.0 to 4.0 representing a qualitative

evaluation for 2010-2011.

The qualitative evaluation is based on the networks performance in the

followin functional areas:

Instructional Quality and Talent Development (40%),

Core Functional Support (30%), and

School Improvement, School Choice, and Community Engagement (30%).

The percentile of the qualitative score across all networks is used in the

calculation of the final score.

7


8/11

Principal Satisfaction (15%)The average response of principals in the network to the question of how

satisfied they are with their network is used to determine this component.

Responses are weighted as follows:

Very Satisfied 100%

Satisfied 66%

No response 50%

Dissatisfied 33%

Very Dissatisfied 0%

8


9/11

Initial score calculationThe four components are incorporated by their weight.

,

Quality Review: Average score, peered (20%)

Qualitative Evaluation: Score, percentile (20%)

Principal Satisfaction: Average score (15%)

9


10/11

Additional creditAdditional credit is intended to reward networks performing well and

supporting schools serving the highest need student populations.

Networks in the top quartile of the peer index (highest need) are eligible

to receive extra credit.

Those in the highest quartile for the qualitative evaluation

receive 10 additional points in the final score.

Those in the second-highest quartile for the qualitative

evaluation receive 5 additional points in the final score.

10


11/11

Final Rankings and QuartilesAll networks are ranked by final overall score

Top quartile 4

Second quartile 2

11

Documents

Network Performance Overview 12111 Final