2
In 2011 national performance assessment frameworks were routinely used by the agency to assess progress in 100% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target = 100%. In 2011 92% of health sector aid was provided by the agency through multi-year commitments - a decrease from 100%. Target = 90%. In 2011 92% of health sector aid provided by the agency used national public financial management systems - a decrease from 100%. Target = 33% reduction in aid not using PFM systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems). The health sector aid provided by the agency that used country procurement systems was deemed not applicable to Netherlands. In 2011, evidence exists in 75% of IHP+ countries that the agency supported civil society engagement in health sector policy processes. Target = 100%. In 2011 the agency participated in health sector mutual assessments of progress in 67% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target = 100%. In 2011 71.3% of capacity development was provided by the agency through coordinated programmes - a decrease from 100%. Target = 50.0%. In 2011 82% of health sector aid was provided by the agency through programme based approaches - a decrease from 90%. Target = 66%. An IHP+ Country Compact or equivalent has been signed by the agency in 100% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target = 100%. In 2011 100% of health sector aid was reported by the agency on national health sector budgets - an increase from 69%. Target = 50% reduction in aid not on budget (with ≥ 85% on budget). In 2011 the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs) used by the agency in the surveyed countries was 0.0 - no change from 0.0. Target = 66% reduction in stock of PIUs. In 2011 131% of health sector aid disbursements provided by the agency were released according to agreed schedules - an increase from 100% in 2007. Target = 71%. Burkina Faso Ethiopia Mali Mozambique Ministry of Foreign Affairs coordinates and carries out Dutch foreign policy and development cooperation, through its headquarters and embassies, multilateral & private organisations and NGOs. Priority themes are food security, water, sexual and reproductive health including HIV/AIDS, security and the rule of law in fragile states. 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 100% 100% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 85% 85% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 50% 50% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 66% 66% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 90% 90% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 71% 71% NO DATA 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 80% 80% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 80% 80% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 100% 100% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 100% 100% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 100% 100% 2012 PARTNER SCORECARD FOR Netherlands ORGANISATION PROFILE IHP+RESULTS COUNTRIES WHERE THE ORGANISATION IS ACTIVE EXPECTED RESULTS RATING TARGET OVERALL PROGRESS Commitments are documented and mutually agreed. Support is based in country plans and strategies, including to strengthen Health Systems. Funding commitments are long-term. Funds are disbursed predictably, as committed. Country systems for procurement and public financial management are used and strengthened. Resources are being managed for Development Results. Mutual accountability is being demonstrated. Civil Society meaningfully engaged. target achieved no progress or regression progress made towards achieving target data not provided measure not applicable indicates agreed target Lower values are better * *Performance is assessed in only Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Budget support is also not counted. The rating may therefore not fully reflect progress, and could be an underestimate.

Netherlands

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

In 2011 national performance assessment frameworks wereroutinely used by the agency to assess progress in 100% of IHP+countries where they exist. Target = 100%.

In 2011 92% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough multi-year commitments - a decrease from 100%. Target =90%.

In 2011 92% of health sector aid provided by the agency usednational public financial management systems - a decrease from100%. Target = 33% reduction in aid not using PFM systems (with≥ 80% using country systems).

The health sector aid provided by the agency that used countryprocurement systems was deemed not applicable to Netherlands.

In 2011, evidence exists in 75% of IHP+ countries that the agencysupported civil society engagement in health sector policyprocesses. Target = 100%.

In 2011 the agency participated in health sector mutualassessments of progress in 67% of IHP+ countries where theyexist. Target = 100%.

In 2011 71.3% of capacity development was provided by theagency through coordinated programmes - a decrease from 100%.Target = 50.0%.

In 2011 82% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough programme based approaches - a decrease from 90%.Target = 66%.

An IHP+ Country Compact or equivalent has been signed by theagency in 100% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target =100%.

In 2011 100% of health sector aid was reported by the agency onnational health sector budgets - an increase from 69%. Target =50% reduction in aid not on budget (with ≥ 85% on budget).

In 2011 the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs)used by the agency in the surveyed countries was 0.0 - no changefrom 0.0. Target = 66% reduction in stock of PIUs.

In 2011 131% of health sector aid disbursements provided by theagency were released according to agreed schedules - anincrease from 100% in 2007. Target = 71%.

Burkina Faso Ethiopia Mali Mozambique

Ministry of Foreign Affairs coordinates and carries out Dutchforeign policy and development cooperation, through itsheadquarters and embassies, multilateral & privateorganisations and NGOs. Priority themes are food security,water, sexual and reproductive health including HIV/AIDS,security and the rule of law in fragile states.

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

85%85%

2005/72005/7

20112011

50%50%

2005/72005/7

20112011

66%66%

2005/72005/7

20112011

90%90%

2005/72005/7

20112011

71%71%

NO DATA

2005/72005/7

20112011

80%80%

2005/72005/7

20112011

80%80%

2005/72005/7

20112011

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2012 PARTNER SCORECARD FOR Netherlands

ORGANISATION PROFILE IHP+RESULTS COUNTRIES WHERE THE ORGANISATION IS ACTIVE

EXPECTED RESULTS RATING TARGET OVERALL PROGRESS

Commitments aredocumented and mutuallyagreed.

Support is based incountry plans andstrategies, including tostrengthen HealthSystems.

Funding commitments arelong-term.

Funds are disbursedpredictably, as committed.

Country systems forprocurement and publicfinancial management areused and strengthened.

Resources are beingmanaged for DevelopmentResults.

Mutual accountability isbeing demonstrated.

Civil Society meaningfullyengaged.

target achieved no progress or regressionprogress made towards achieving target data not provided measure not applicable indicates agreed target

Lower values are better

*

*Performance is assessed in only Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Budget support is also not counted. The rating may therefore not fully reflect progress, and could be an underestimate.

Prod

uced

by

the

inde

pend

ent N

orth

-Sou

th C

onso

rtium

for I

HP+

Resu

lts, m

anda

ted

by IH

P+ G

loba

l Com

pact

sig

nato

ries.

See

ww

w.ih

pres

ults

.net

Desig

n lic

ense

d w

ith C

reat

ive

Com

mon

s w

ith s

ome

rest

rictio

ns, 2

010

The Netherlands has signed national compacts in Ethiopia, Mali and Mozambique.

Support in all countries is based on national health strategies and plans. In 2011 all financial support was reported on national healthsector budgets.

The Netherlands has multi-year strategic plans of 4 years: the last one from 2007-2011.

In Burkina Faso and Mozambique 100% of health sector aid has been disbursed according to plan. In Ethiopia and Mali more than100% originally committed were disbursed in 2011, due to renewed collaborations into the new multi-year strategic plans for 2012-2015.

The Netherlands provided non-earmarked funds in 2011 to the public health sector of Burkina Faso, Mali and Mozambique which useentirely public financial management systems, also for procurement. In Ethiopia a trust fund of the World Bank has been used forsupport to the national health sector, using World Bank procedures for procurement.

The Netherlands used national performance assessment frameworks in all 4 countries and advocates for improved use in all countries.

In all 4 countries, the Netherlands participates in national health reviews and advocates for including and improving mutualassessments of IHP+ compacts in these processes. In Burkina Faso, the Netherlands will phase out in 2013 in the health sector. Fromnow till 2013, UNICEF in Burkina Faso will be the vocal partner in future health reviews.

The Netherlands has played a key role in supporting the inclusion of CSOs in national health planning and monitoring. In all 4 countriesCSO are supported, in advancing the access and quality of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights and in promoting a bettercoordination and collaboration between public and private sector.

SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE RESULTS

This additional information is reported by the Organisation to explain what specific actions it is taking to implement its IHP+ commitments to the8 Expected Results, or to qualify its measures of progress.

HOW TO INTERPRET THIS SCORECARDExpected Results reflect key commitments that were made by IHP+ signatories in the IHP+ Global Compact. Each expected result hascorresponding standard performance measures to track progress over time. The progress of all agencies is rated against these mutuallyagreed expectations.Rating symbols illustrate whether the Agency has achieved , is working towards , or has not achieved its targets overthe most recent annual reporting cycle. Details of these independent assessments undertaken by the IHP+Results Consortium can befound online in the North-South Observatory for IHP+Results (www.ihpresults.net).Target describes the aggregate data on which the Rating is based, with a comparison of 2011 and baseline performance.Overall Progress shows a two-bar graph with the aggregate data for the agency in question across all the countries for which healthsector support has been reported. In most cases, the agreed target for each standard performance measure (SPM) is shown as a redline.Scorecard ratings are aggregates of performance across a number of countries. Aggregates might hide variations in the agency'sperformance. Disaggregated data can be found at www.ihpresults.netNB: The ratings presented here are based on self-reported data. IHP+Results has taken steps to triangulate this data using othersources. More details are vailable at www.ihpresults.net