Upload
agora-group
View
1.752
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Tag line, tag line
NetApp Networked
Storage ------ the best and most
efficient storage for
Virtualization environments
Hans Lamprecht
NetApp SEE
March 2011
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 2NetApp Confidential - Limited Use
Leaders Rely on NetApp
Energy
Telco
GovernmentFinancial
Media/InternetHealthcare
Tech
Manufacturing
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
Growth Companies of Scale5 year CAGR of 20% for Companies Over $4B
3NetApp Confidential – Do Not Distribute
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 4NetApp Confidential - Limited Use
Global Leadership
Broad solutions portfolio
Comprehensive professional
services
Global support
Industry-leading partners
135+ offices around the world
~10000 employees
Fortune 1000, S&P 500,
NASDAQ 100
FY10: $3.93 Billion
07060504 08 09 10
$3B
$4B
$2B
$1B
4
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. NetApp Confidential – Limited Use
2010 FAS Market Share - Revenue
Vendor Revenue ($M) Share
NetApp $2,352.3 13.4%
EMC $5,173.5 29.5%
IBM $2,275.7 13.0%
HP $1,909.5 10.9%
Dell $1,471.7 8.4%
Other $4,362.2 24.9%
Total $17,544.8
2010 FAS Revenue
Market Share
Source: IDC, Mar 2010
FAS equals the combined NAS and SAN markets
2010 FAS Revenue
Market Share
Source: IDC, Mar 2010
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. NetApp Confidential – Limited Use
2010 FAS Market Share - Capacity
Vendor Petabytes Share
NetApp 1,715.3 18.9%
EMC 2,618.3 26.9%
HP 1,171.9 12.2%
IBM 1,029.7 10.7%
Dell 803.4 8.3%
Other 2,299.9 23.9%
Total 9,638.4
2010 FAS Capacity
Market Share
Source: IDC, Mar 2010
FAS equals the combined NAS and SAN markets
2010 FAS Capacity
Market Share
Source: IDC, Mar 2010
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
2010 Replication SW Market Share
Vendor Revenue ($M) Share
NetApp $835.5 32.7%
EMC $832.5 32.5%
IBM $302.4 11.8%
HDS $163.6 6.4%
HP $79.7 3.1%
Other $344.0 13.4%
Total $2,557.7
2010 Replication SW Revenue
Market Share
Source: IDC, Mar 2010
2010 Replication SW Revenue
Market Share
Source: IDC, Mar 2010
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 8
NetApp Ranks #1 Enterprise Array in 2010Storage Magazine
#1 in ―initial product quality‖
#1 in ―product features‖
Highest percentage
―would buy this product again‖
Top of the rankings for 2nd year
Source: Storage Magazine - March 2010
Netapp
EMC
IBM
HDS
HP
3PAR
Sun
Overall Rankings
5.00 6.00
NetApp Confidential - Limited Use
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
272TB136 Drives
68TB68 Drives
2,880TB1,440 Drives
6TB Flash Cache
2,880TB1,440 Drives
8TB Flash Cache
1,200TB600 Drives
1TB
Flash Cache
2,400TB1,200 Drives
3TB Flash Cache
1,920TB960 Drives
2TB Flash Cache
480TB240 Drives
512GB
Flash Cache
9
Industry’s Best Storage Platform
for Future-Ready IT
Truly unified
Most efficient
Extremely flexible
New NetApp®
Portfolio
FAS/V3210
FAS2020
FAS/V6240
FAS/V6280
FAS/V3240
FAS/V6210
FAS/V3270
FAS2040
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
V-Series Open Storage Controllers
New V6200 and V3200 Models
10
Supporting Disk Arrays from Major Storage Vendors
V-Series builds on your current storage
investment to satisfy unmet needs
V62802,880TBV6240
2,880TBV62102,400TB
V32701,920TBV3240
1,200TBV3210480TB
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 11NetApp Confidential - Limited Use
The Benefits of Unified Storage
NetApp®
High-End SAN
Low/Midrange SAN
NAS
Disaster Recovery
Archive & Compliance
Backup
Virtualization
Industry Approach
FAS family
Data ONTAP®
Different hardware
Different software
Different people
Different processes
Same hardware
Same software
Same people
Same processes
Flexibility
Efficiency
Agility
Value
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 12
What If You Could . . .
Backup and restore your VMs
instantaneously
Easily protect all your virtualized data
with DR
Save 50% on your storage, power,
cooling, and space
Deduplicate virtual server and virtual
desktop data, enabling 50% space
savings, or more
Automate your most labor-intensive
data management tasks
Clone and provision storage as
quickly as your VMs
Do all of this with one architecture in
any environment
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 13
After
Virtualizing
Servers
Before
Virtualizing
Servers*
Virtualization Increases Storage Demands
Number of applications per server
Number of physical servers
Number of apps down on storage failure
Data lost on dual-disk failure
Backup data volume
Meeting backup window
Disaster recovery
Provisioning
1
10+
1
1x
1x
Feasible
Costly/complex
Slow/complex
10+
1
10+
10x
10x
Maybe not
More complex
Storage ≠ servers
* Typical configuration: DAS, RAID 5, tape backup
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 14
The Requirement for Networked Storage
Advanced VMware features are only enabled through the use of networked storage.
APP
OS
VM1 VM2 VM2
APP
OS
VM1 VM2 VM2VM1
APP
OS
APP
OS
VM1 VM2 VM2VM1
APP
OS
Load Balancing with VMware
DRS
Application Protection via
VMware HA and FT
Site-to-Site Recovery with VMware Site
Recovery Manager
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 15
The Evolution of the Data Center
Primary Site DR Site
Ph
ysic
al
Ph
ysic
al
A common storage pool across physical and virtual
CIFS
& NFS
Storage PoolUser Data
APP
OS
APP
OS
Virtual
Desktops
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 16
Best Storage for Virtualized Environments
The Most Efficient Storage
The Most Flexible IT Infrastructure
Best-in-Class Data Protection
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 17
Best Storage for Virtualized Environments
Instantaneous backup and recovery of VMs
Cost-effective DR with integrated failover
Best-in-Class Data Protection
― We were able to stand up both our headquarters and disaster
recovery sites for about the same investment we’d have made
for a single-site EMC solution.‖
-George White, CIO, Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 1818
Instantaneous, Storage-Efficient Backup
The Problem Tape is slow, complex
Streaming backups take too long
Recoveries are slow
Recovery points are limited
NetApp Snapshot™ Solution Backups built-in to the storage
Instantaneous backup and recovery
Low storage overhead
Frequent, application consistent
Traditional Backup Is NOT PracticalFast, Affordable, and Simple
Backup and Restores
Storage Pool
CPU UtilizationCPU Utilization
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 19
Usable Snapshots for Rapid Recovery
Market-leading performance
SPC-1 Performance (IOPs)
NetApp®
FAS3040
EMC
CX3-40
Baseline With Snapshots
NetApp
FAS3040
EMC
CX3-40
24% higher 233% higher30,986 29,958
8,997
24,997
NetApp
– 3% difference
– Snapshots 4/hr
– First RAID 6
EMC
– 64% impact
– Snapshots 1/hr
– Best practice
mirroring
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
SnapManager® for Virtual Infrastructure
Primary Site
API
Storage Pool
Policy-based
management of
– Snapshots
– Restores
– Replication
Restore Datastores,
VMDKs, or individual
files within VMDK
VM-aware snapshot
SMVI coordinated with
vCenter
Storage admin sets and
controls policy
Virtual server admin
delegated to run data
management for virtual
infrastructure20
VirtualServerAdmin
Backup
Restore
DR
POLICIES
StorageAdmin
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 212121
SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure
Automates Snapshot ReplicationDR Site
VirtualServerAdmin
API
Backup
Restore
DR
POLICIES
Storage Pool
APP
OS
APP
OS
APP
OS
Storage Pool
Primary Site
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 22
APP
OS
APP
OS
APP
OS
APP
OS
2222
VMware Site Recovery Manager
Disaster Recovery & Runbook AutomationDR Site
SRM SRM
VirtualServerAdmin
Storage Pool
APP
OS
APP
OS
APP
OS
Storage Pool
SiteFailureConfirm?
Primary Site
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 232323
VMware Site Recovery Manager
Automated DR Testing w/FlexCloneDR Site
VirtualServerAdmin
Storage Pool
SRM SRM
VM1VMDK
VM2VMDK
VM1VMDK
VM2VMDK
APP
OS
APP
OS
Test DR
Primary Site
―I can [also] quickly test and automate my DR with VMware® Site
Recovery Manager and NetApp® FlexClone®. Bottom line: NetApp
saves us a ton of time and money.‖—Vincent Biddlecombe, CTO, Transplace
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
Issue
User error :
Data corruption:
System or site failure:
Regional disasters:
Data Protection for Any Failure
Building 1 Building 2
Recover in minutes
Transparent failover
NetApp
End-user recovery
Instantaneous restores
VMware HA
MetroCluster
VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager
SnapMirror
Primary Site Secondary / DR Site
24
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
Securely isolate shared virtual server, network, and storage resources
Consistent QoS at each layer
Manage each resource pool independently as a dynamic IT asset
Reduce risk and cost while boosting IT agility
A Cisco Validated Design
25
HR BU APP
VMware VMware VMware
HR Apps BU Apps Core Apps
• MultiStore®
• NetApp Data Motion™
• NFS/iSCSI
• Nexus 1000V
• Nexus 2000/5000/7000
• UCS
• 10GbE
• vSphere™
• vShield Zones
• vCenter™
NetApp Secure Multi-TenancyThe industry’s only end-to-end secure multi-tenancy solution
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 26
Best Storage for Virtualized Environments
The Most Efficient Storage
Primary storage deduplication
Manage more for less
Better overall TCO
Use 50% less storage. Guaranteed*..
―We anticipate virtualizing all of our physical servers within the
next year. We wouldn’t be able to do that with another storage
platform. We’d have to have at least three times the storage we
have now with NetApp.‖- Tres Vance, Manager of Technical Infrastructure, Burt’s Bees, Inc.
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
Industry-Leading IT Efficiency
Storage Efficiency
Data Growth
$
TB
Application integration
Storage management automation
Integrated data protection
Service automation
Enables You to Do More with Less $
Snapshot™ Technology
SATA/Flash Cache
RAID-DP®
Thin Provisioning
Virtual Copies
Thin Replication
Deduplication
Operational Efficiency
27
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 28
Deduplication: Essential for Virtualization
Many virtual machine images are 100% identical
Traditional Enterprise RAID ArraysNetApp® FAS System
Duplicate Data
Is Eliminated
Savings extend to all copies of the data - Including backup, DR, test clones, and archival copies
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 29NetApp Confidential - Limited Use
Deduplication
Pervasive Deduplication
20:1 reduction in
secondary
30-50% reduction in
primary
Capability, not a platform
Before After
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
Manage More with Less
30
Server or Desktop Admin
Policies
Storage
Admin
Storage Pool
Manage server, desktops and storage together
Integrated with VMware vCenter Server
Delegate basic storage administrative tasks
Storage admin retains control of storage assets
Automation
Monitor
Provision
Clone
Backup
Recover
DR
Centralized, simplified
management
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 31
Total
Cost
Index
100
204218
123
Product Acquisition
and Ongoing Vendor Costs
Downtime and Recovery
Costs
Source: Oliver Wyman VMware Storage Total Cost Comparison Update, Feb. 2009
Internal Operational
Costs
Less primary storage required due to dedupe,
Snapshot™, & thin provisioning
NetApp has a 2x TB/FTE ratio compared to EMC
and HP
NetApp has at least a 2x recovery time advantage
over EMC and HP
TCO Comparison in VMware®
ESX Environments
As Much as 54% in TCO Savings
36
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
NetApp w/o
Dedupe
NetApp w/
Dedupe
EMC
CLARiiON
HP EVA
6037
94
98
20
43
77
33
84
27Acquisition & Ongoing Vendor Cost
Operational Cost
Downtime & Recovery Cost
20
43
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
―During the research phase of your next storage purchasing
cycle, ask each vendor if it offers a capacity savings or
utilization guarantee.‖
Gartner Inc. Nov 2008 April Adams Capacity Savings and Storage Utilization
Guarantees: What's Included, and Are They Worth Considering?
32
Virtualization Guarantee* Program
50% less with NetApp systems
35% less on your existing systems
―We now see an average of 83%
reductions in redundant data
on our VMware® system.‖
- Jonathan Davis, Duke Institute for Genome Sciences
and Policy
*For terms and conditions, go to netapp.com/guarantee
50
Use NetApp for your virtual environments, and we guarantee* you will use less storage.
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 33
Best Storage for Virtualized Environments
The Most Flexible IT Infrastructure
Unified storage platform
Scale capacity in real time
Provision storage as fast as virtual servers
―On one occasion when we ran out of capacity in the VMware®
VMFS, it took an administrator more than 13 hours over a
weekend to expand a LUN from 10 to 15GB. That same process
on NetApp takes about 17 seconds—we timed it.‖
-George Neill, Director of IT at Organic Valley Farms
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 34
Non-Disruptive Movement of Data
VMware Storage VMotion Non-disruptively migrate a VM across
datastores
Storage protocol independent
Manage VM performance and storage
utilization
Datastore
NetApp Data Motion Non-disruptively migrate datastores
across storage systems
Moves 100s to 1000s of VMs in single
operation
Manage array capacity and performance
Perform non-disruptive upgrades
Storage VMotion
Datastore
DatastoreDatastore
VMware
Administrator
NetApp
Administrator
VMDK
Data Motion
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 35
Rapidly Scale Servers and Storage
Rapidly provision servers and
storage – Clone virtual servers in seconds
– Zero capacity clones
– Scale storage in realtime
Dynamically scale – Quickly create entire application or
development environments
– Scale down or reallocate capacity as
business needs change
NetApp
Storage Pool
NetApp
Storage Pool
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
Summary: Key Differentiators
There are 5 key areas where NetApp is different from
every other storage vendor in the industry:
Data Protection
– RAID-DP, SMVI, SnapMirror, Snapshots
Single, multi-protocol OS (Reduce Complexity)
– Single skillset and set of processes
– Architectural Flexibility
Innovations which reduce storage (Store Less)
– Flexclone, SnapShot and Deduplication
Allow application admins to manage storage (Faster IT)
– Push protection decisions to the application layer
Unmatched heterogeneity (Leverage What You Own)
– We’re equal opportunity: All the value above for other vendors’
storage
36
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.
Industry-Leading Systems Portfolio:
Truly Unified
Protocols Broad System Portfolio
Flash Cache
SSD
FlexCache®
Cost/Performance
Unified Management
Same tools and processes:
learn once, run everywhere
Integrated data management
Integrated data protection
One Architecture for Many Workloads
FC
FCoE
iSCSI
NFS
CIFS
37
Tag line, tag line
NetApp
Virualization
Customer Success
Stories
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 39
Customer Experience
Activation times down to minutes;
backups went from 96 hours to 31 minutes
Saw an average of 83% reductions in redundant data on its
VMware® system
Set up a new testing environment in an afternoon to better test for
compliance with food tracking legislation
Rapidly stood up server and storage resources to efficiently
handle the Do Not Call reregistration program
Brought virtual server restore times down by over 75%,
going from 1.5 hours to just 10–15 minutes
Quadrupled storage capacity without increasing headcount
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 40NetApp Confidential - Internal Use OnlyNetApp Confidential - Limited Use 40
The Experience at BT
Increased Efficiency
3103 physical servers consolidated to 134
Utilization improved from 25% to 70%
2MW ($2.25M per year) power savings
660 racks of space saved
Server provisioning from 6 weeks to 1 day
Backup went from 96 hours to 31 minutes
Business Impact
Enabled ―capacity on demand‖ business
Raised service levels
Consolidated from 8 to 5 data centers
8 month ROI
BT is one of the
world's leading
providers of
communications
solutions and
services operating
in 170 countries.
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 41NetApp Confidential - Internal Use OnlyNetApp Confidential - Limited Use 41
The Picture at BT
New Model Data Center
On the Way to Recycling
© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved. 42
Thank You
42© 2010 NetApp. All rights reserved.