Needs A

Prepar

ssessment Rep

red by: Cha

port - Chatham-

atham-Kent/

NE

Region

-Kent/Lambton

/Lambton/S

EEDS ASS

n: Chatham

Date

n/Sarnia Regio

Sarnia Stud

SESSMENT

m-Kent/L

: June 12, 2

on

dy Team

T REPOR

Lambton/S

2016

Hydro One Netw483 Bay Street Toronto, OntarioM5G 2P5

RT

Sarnia

June 1

works Inc.

2, 2016

Needs A

This restudy te

ssessment Rep

eport is prepeam with the

port – Chatham

pared on bee participatio

Hydro Inde

Bluew

Hyd

m-Kent/Lambto

ehalf of the on of represe

Org

One Networpendent Ele

water PowerEn

dro One Netw

n/Sarnia Regio

Chatham-Kentatives from

ganizations

rks Inc. (Leactricity Syst

r Distributionntegrus Inc.works Inc. (D

on

Kent/Sarnia/Lm the follow

ad Transmitttem Operaton Corporatio

Distribution)

Lambton regwing organiz

ter) r

on

)

June

Page

gional plannzations:

e 12, 2016

e | 2

ning

Needs A

Disclaim

This Nethe ChcoordinNeeds processand resassump

Study Networimpliedwithoutunder athe Neethird paany diredamagefrom orReport aforeme

ssessment Rep

mer

eeds Assessmhatham-Kentnated region

Assessmentses and may sults reporteptions provid

team partirks Inc. (cold, statutory ot limitation, any circumsteds Assessmarty reading ect, indirect es or any losr in any wa

or its conentioned per

port – Chatham

ment Reportt/Lambton/Sal planning.t Report mbe reevalua

ed in this Nded by study

icipants, thlectively, “t

or otherwise)the accurac

tances whatsment Report

or receivingor conseques of profit, loy related tontents by arsons and ent

m-Kent/Lambto

t was prepararnia and . The potentay be studited based on

Needs Assesteam partici

heir respectthe Authors”) as to the Ncy or complsoever, be liwas prepare

g the Needs Aential loss oross of contra the relianceany person tities.

n/Sarnia Regio

red for the puto assess wtial needs thied further n the findingssment Repoipants.

tive affiliat”) make no

Needs Assessleteness of iable to eached (“the IntAssessment r damages oact, loss of oe on, accept

or entity,

on

urpose of idwhether thohat have be through su

gs of furtherort are base

ted organizrepresentatisment Reporthe informa

h other, or totended ThirdReport (“th

or for any puopportunity otance or use

including,

dentifying poose needs

een identifieubsequent rer analysis. Thed on the in

zations, andons or warrrt or its contation thereino any third pd Parties”), he Other Thiunitive, incidor loss of goe of the Nee

but not l

June

Page

otential needrequire furd through

egional plannhe load forenformation

d Hydro Oranties (exprtents, includn and shall party for whor to any ord Parties”),

dental or speodwill resuleds Assessmlimited to,

e 12, 2016

e | 3

ds in rther this

ning cast and

One ress, ding,

not, hom ther , for ecial ting

ment the

Needs A

 

NAME

LEAD REGION START DAT

1. INThe purposKent/Lambtplanning. Wneeds will bparties as req

For needs th(IESO) will Resource Plsolution), or

2. RThe Needs AEnergy Boamanage the Regions are Assessment June 12, 201

3. SCThe scope oPlanning Pro The scope transformer System reliaNeeds Asses Needs emergpart of the IEdevelop a 20

4. INStudy teamprovided inactivities alrdistributed equipment a

5. AThe assessmstudy periodsingle contin

ssessment Rep

TE

NTRODUCse of this on/Sarnia Re

Where regionabe addressed quired.

hat require furinitiate the S

lanning (IRRr whether both

REGIONALAssessment ford’s (OEB) Rregional planbeing reviewfor Chatham

16. COPE OF Nf this Needs Aocess Workin

of the Needstation capac

ability, operassment.

ging over theESO-led Scop0-year strategNPUTS/DAT

m participantsnformation foready underwgeneration (

approaching eASSESSMENment’s primard (2015 – 202ngency analys

port – Chatham

NEEDS A

Cha

HyChaApr

TION Needs Asse

egion and deal coordinatiobetween rele

rther regionalScoping Asse

RP) process, oh are requiredISSUE/ TR

or the ChathaRegional Infranning processwed first. The-Kent/Lambto

NEEDS ASSAssessment wng Group Rep

ds Assessmencity, transmisational issues

next 10 yearping Assessm

gic direction foTA s, including ror the Chathaway, historical(DG) informend-of-life. NT METHOry objective w24). The assesis to identify

m-Kent/Lambto

ASSESSMEN

atham-Kent/L

dro One Netwatham-Kent/Lril 13, 2016

essment repoetermine if thon is not reqevant Local D

l planning andessment proceor the transmd.

RIGGERam-Kent/Lambastructure Plas, Ontario’s 2e Chatham-Keon/Sarnia Reg

SESSMENTwas limited toport to the OE

nt includes assion circuit t

and asset rep

rs and requirinment and/or IRfor the Region

representativeam-Kent/Laml load, load foation, system

ODOLOGYwas to identifessment reviey needs.

n/Sarnia Regio

NT EXECUT

Lambton/Sarn

works Inc. Lambton/Sarn

ort is to uhere are regi

quired, and a Distribution C

d coordinationess to determ

mitter-led Reg

bton/Sarnia Ranning proces21 regions weent/Lambton/gion was trig

To the next 10 yEB.

a review of tthermal capacplacement pl

ng coordinateRRP, or in then

es from LDCmbton/Sarniaforecast, consem reliability

Y

fy the electricewed availabl

on

TIVE SUMM

nia Study Tea

nia

END DAT

undertake anional needs t“localized”

Companies (L

n, the Indepemine whether gional Infrastr

Region was trss approved iere assigned /Sarnia Regio

ggered on Apr

years as per th

transmission city, voltage plans were also

ed regional ple next plannin

Cs, the IESORegion. The

ervation and performance

cal infrastructle information

MARY

am

TE June 12

n assessmentthat require wires solutioLDCs) and H

endent Electrian IESO-led

ructure Plan

riggered in rein August 20to one of thr

on belongs to ril 13, 2016 a

he recommen

system capaperformance o briefly rev

lanning may bng cycle. If re

O, and Hydre informationdemand man

e, operationa

ture needs inn and load fo

June

Page

2, 2016

t of the Ccoordinated

on is necessarHydro One an

city System Od Integrated R(RIP) proces

sponse to the013. To prioriree groups - GGroup 3. Th

and was comp

ndations of the

ability whichand load restiewed as par

be further assequired, an IR

ro One transn included: pnagement (CDal issues and

n the Region orecasts and i

e 12, 2016

e | 4

Chatham-regional ry, such nd other

Operator Regional ss (wires

Ontario itize and Group 1

he Needs pleted on

e

h covers toration.

rt of this

sessed as RRP will

smission planning DM) and d major

over the included

Needs A

6. RTransmissio A. 230/115 k

BaseTS) auto

B. 230 kV T Base

adeq

C. 115 kV T Base

adeq

D. 230 kV a Loa

net l System Reli A. Load Se

Baseconf

B. Load Re Base

infra

C. Voltage Und

stati

D. Bulk Po Base

Regwith

Aging Infra During the splace. Furthe

7. RBased on threlevant LD

ssessment Rep

RESULTS on Capacity

kV Autotransed on the grosupplying th

otransformer i

Transmission ed on the groquate over the

Transmission ed on the groquate over the

and 115 kV Cdings at Kentload forecast.

iability, Ope

ecurity ed on thefiguration, loa

estoration ed on the gastructure, res

Performanceder gross regions in the reg

ower System Ped on the ass

gion. The IESh different sys

astructure / R

study period, er details of t

RECOMMEe findings of Cs to develop

port – Chatham

Needs

sformer Capacoss regional-che Region isin the Region

Lines oss regional-ce study period

Lines oss regional-ce study period

onnection Fat TS exceed t.

ration and R

gross regad security cr

gross regionstoration crite

e ional-coincidgion meet Ma

Performance sumed systemO might undstem conditio

Replacement

plans to replahese investm

NDATIONSf the Needs Ap a local plan

m-Kent/Lambto

city oincident loa

s adequate ovn.

coincident lod for the loss

coincident lod for the loss

cilities their transform

Restoration N

gional-coincidriteria can be

nal-coincidenteria can be me

dent peak loaarket Rule req

in the Regionm study conddertake plannions.

t Plan

ace aged equients can be fo

S ssessment, thto address th

n/Sarnia Regio

d forecast, thver the study

oad forecast, of a single 23

oad forecast, of a single 11

mer 10-Day L

Needs

dent load met over the

t load forecaet over the stu

ad conditionsquirements.

n ditions, no buing study to a

ipment at statound in Sectio

he study teamhermal overloa

on

he 230/115 kVy period for

the 230 kV c30 kV circuit

the 115 kV c15 kV circuit

Long Term R

forecast anstudy period.

asts with thudy period.

, post-contin

ulk power syaccess the ade

tions and seveon 6.3 of this

m recommendsad of transfor

V autotransforthe loss of a

circuits suppin the Region

circuits suppin the Region

Rating (LTR)

nd the exi.

he use of e

ngency voltag

ystem issue wequacy of the

eral transmiss report.

s Hydro One rmer T3 at Ke

June

Page

rmers capacita single 230/

lying the Regn.

lying the Regn.

in 2016 base

isting transm

existing trans

ge at a l l tran

was identifiede bulk power

sion circuits w

transmissionent TS.

e 12, 2016

e | 5

ty (Scott /115 kV

gion are

gion are

d on the

mission

smission

nsformer

d in the system

will take

n and the

Needs

TABNeed

List o1 

2  R

3 

3.1....

4 

4.1

5  A

6  R

6.1

6.2

6.3

7  R

8  R

Appe

Appe

Appe

s Assessment R

BLE OF Cds Assessmen

of Figures anIntroduction

Regional Iss

Scope of Ne

1 Chatham-K...................

Inputs and D

1 Load Forec

Assessment

Results .......

1 Transm

6.1.1 230

6.1.2 230 k

6.1.3 115 k

6.1.4 230 k

2 System

6.2.1 Load

6.2.2 Load

6.2.3 Volt

6.2.4 Bulk

3 Aging I

Recommend

References .

endix A: Loa

endix B: Key

endix C: Acr

Report - Chatha

ONTENTSnt Executive

nd Tables …n ..................

sue / Trigger

eeds Assessm

Kent/Lambto...................

Data ............

cast .............

Methodolog

...................

mission Syste

kV and 115

kV Transmi

kV Transmi

kV and 115

m Reliability,

d Security ...

d Restoration

age Perform

k Power Syst

Infrastructur

dations ........

...................

ad Forecasts

y Terms and

ronyms .......

am-Kent/Lamb

S e Summary ..

………………....................

r ...................

ment.............

on/Sarnia Re....................

....................

....................

gy ................

....................

em Capacity

5 kV Autotra

ssion Lines .

ssion Lines .

kV Connect

, Operation a

....................

n ..................

mance ...........

tem Perform

re and Repla

....................

....................

...................

Definitions

....................

bton/Sarnia Reg

....................

………………....................

....................

....................

egion Descrip....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

y Needs ........

ansformers ...

....................

....................

tion Facilitie

and Restorat

....................

....................

....................

mance in the R

acement Plan

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

gion

....................

……………....................

....................

....................

ption and Co....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

es .................

tion Review

....................

....................

....................

Region ........

n of Major E

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

……………....................

....................

....................

onnection C....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

Equipment ...

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

Jun

Page |

...................

……………......................

...................

...................

Configuration...................

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 1

................. 2

................. 2

e 12, 2016

6

4

.7 8 

8 

9 

n9 

2 

3 

3 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

5 

5 

5 

6 

6 

6 

7 

7 

8 

21 

23 

Needs

LIST FigurFigur

LIST TableTableTableTableTableTable

s Assessment R

T OF FIGU

re 1: Map ofre 2: Single-

T OF TAB

e 1: Study tee 2: Hydro Oe 3 : Gas-firee 4 : CDM foe 5: Chathame 6 : Chatham

Report – Chatha

URES

f Chatham-KLine diagram

BLES

eam participaOne and custed generationorecast for th

m-Kent/Lambm-Kent/Lam

am-Kent/Lamb

Kent/Lambtonm – Chatham

ants for Chattomer assets n output levhe Chatham-bton/Sarnia

mbton/Sarnia

bton/Sarnia Re

n/Sarnia Regm-Kent/Lam

tham-Kent/Lin Chathamels assumed- Kent/Lambregional coi

a regional no

egion

gion ............mbton/Sarnia

Lambton/Sarm-Kent/Lambd for Needs Abton/Sarnia Rincidental loon-coinciden

....................Region .......

rnia Region .bton/Sarnia RAssessment .Region ........ad forecast ..

ntal load fore

Ju

Page |

...................

................. 1

...................Region ...... 1................. 1................. 1................. 1ecast ......... 2

une 12, 2016

7

9 1 

8 0 2 8 9 

20 

Needs

1 I

This may yearsregioSysteProce The plannKent/determand/onecescustorecomthe IAssesPlannproce This Kent/captuIESO Table

No.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

2 R

The Nrespoappro

s Assessment R

NTRODUC

Needs Assesbe emerging

s. The devenal planning

em Code (TSess Working

purpose of ning activiti/Lambton/Samine if thes

or a coordinassary to addromer(s) willmmend solutIndependent ssment procning (IRRP)ess (wires so

report was p/Lambton/Sa

ures the resuO.

e 1: Study tea

Hydro On

Independe

Bluewater

Entegrus P

Hydro On

REGIONA

Needs Asseonse to the Ooved in Au

Report – Chatha

CTION

ssment reporg in the Cha

elopment of g process asSC) and Distg Group (PPW

this Needsies already arnia Regionse needs reqated regionaress the needl further ution(s). For n

Electricitycess to deter) process, o

olution), or b

prepared by Harnia Regionults of the as

am participa

Organ

ne Networks

ent Electricit

r Power Dist

Power Lines

ne Networks

AL ISSUE /

ssment for tOntario Energust 2013.

am-Kent/Lamb

rt provides aatham-Kent/

f the Needs set out in thtribution SysWG) Report

s Assessmenunderway;

n to identify quire a “local planning ads, Hydro Onundertake plneeds that re System Ormine whethor the trans

both are requ

Hydro One (n Needs Assssessment b

ants for Chat

nizations

Inc. (Lead T

ty System Op

tribution Cor

s Inc.

Inc. (Distrib

/ TRIGGE

the Chathamrgy Board’s To prioritiz

bton/Sarnia Re

a description/Lambton/Sa Assessmenhe Ontario Estem Code (to the OEB

nt report is undertake near term an

calized” wireassessment. ne, as transmlanning ass

equire furtheOperator (the

her an IESOsmitter-led

uired.

(Lead Transmsessment stuased on info

tham-Kent/L

Transmitter)

perator

rporation

bution)

ER

m-Kent/Lamb(OEB) Regi

ze and man

egion

n of the analyarnia (the R

nt report is Energy Boar(DSC) requir.

to: conside

an assessnd/or emergies only soluWhere a loc

mitter, with Lsessments ter regional ple IESO) wO-led IntegrRegional In

mitter) with udy team listormation pro

Lambton/Sar

bton/Sarnia ional Infrast

nage the reg

ysis to identRegion) over

in accordanrd’s (OEB) rements and

er the inforsment of thing needs inution(s) in tcal wires onLDCs or otho develop lanning and

will initiate rated Regionfrastructure

input from tted in Table ovided by L

rnia Region

Region wastructure Plangional plann

Ju

Page |

tify needs thar the next tence with thTransmissio

d the Plannin

rmation fromhe Chatham

n the area; anthe near-term

nly solution er connectinoptions ancoordinationthe Scopin

nal Resource Plan (RIP

the Chatham1. The repo

LDCs and th

s triggered inning procesning proces

une 12, 2016

8

at en he on ng

m m-nd m is

ng nd n,

ng ce P)

m-ort he

in ss s,

Needs

OntarbeingRegio

3 S

This assesinclutransfand lwere

3.1 CC

The rthe tEnnisis borFigur

s Assessment R

rio’s 21 regig reviewed on began on

SCOPE OF

Needs Asssment periodes a reviewformer statioload restoratalso briefly

Chatham-KeConfiguratio

region includtownships oskillen, St. Crdered by there 1 illustrate

Fig

Report – Chatha

ions were asfirst. The RApril 13, 20

F NEEDS A

sessment cod of 10 yearw of transmon capacity,tion. Systemreviewed as

ent/Lambtoon

des the munof Petrolia, Clair, Warwie London ares the approx

gure 1: Map

am-Kent/Lamb

ssigned to oRegion falls 016 and was

ASSESSM

overs the Crs, from 201

mission syste, transmissio

m reliability,s part of this

n/Sarnia Re

nicipalities ofPlympton-W

ick, and Villrea to the easximate study

p of Chatha

bton/Sarnia Re

one of three into Group

s completed o

MENT

Chatham-Ken15 to 2024. em connection circuit th operationalNeeds Asse

egion Descr

f Lambton SWyoming, Blages of Oil st and Windsy area.

am-Kent/La

egion

groups, whp 3. The Neon June 12,

nt/Lambton/The scope o

ion facility ermal capacl issues andessment.

ription and

Shores and CBrooke-AlviSprings and

sor-Essex to

ambton/Sarn

ere Group 1eeds Assessm2016.

/Sarnia Regof the Needcapability w

city, voltaged asset repla

Connection

Chatham-Keinston, Dawd Point Edw the southwe

nia Region

Ju

Page |

1 Regions arment for th

gion over as Assessmenwhich cover performanc

acement plan

n

ent, as well awn-Euphemiaward. The are

est.

une 12, 2016

9

re is

an nt rs ce ns

as a, ea

Needs

ElecttransmcircuRegio(B3N Listeconne

Table

N1SS2N

s Assessment R

tricity supplymission lineits (N21W, on also con

N, L4D and L

d in Table 2ected custom

e 2: Hydro O

115 kV Circ

, N4S, N6C, N, N5K, K2Z

Report – Chatha

y for the Rees. The bulkN22W, L24

ntains a numL51D)

2 and shownmers’ assets i

One and custo

cuits

N7C, N6S, V43NL25VL28CW44LS47CN21W

am-Kent/Lamb

egion is provk of the el

4L, L26L, Wmber of inte

n in Figure 2in the Chath

omer assets i

230 kV Circu

N7S, VN, L23N, LV, L37G, LC, L29C, LC, W4

C, L24L, LW, N22W

bton/Sarnia Re

vided througectrical sup

W44LC and Werconnection

2 are Hydro ham-Kent/La

in Chatham-K

uits H

T

V41N, L27V, L38G,

C31, 45LS,L26L,

Scott TKent ModelWanstAndreWalla

egion

gh a networkpply is transW45LS) towns with neig

One transmambton/Sarn

Kent/Lambt

Hydro One Transformer

Stations TS, LambtonTS, Duart

land tead TS, ew ceburg TS

k of 230 kVsmitted throwards Buchaghboring M

mission and nia Region.

ton/Sarnia R

CTr

n TS, TS, TS, St.

TS,

Forest CustomCustomCustomCustomCustomCustomCustomCustom

Ju

Page | 1

V and 115 kVough 230 kVanan TS. Thichigan Stat

transmission

Region

Customer ransformer Stations Jura HVDS,

mer CTSmer CTSmer CTSmer CTSmer CTSmer CTSmer CTSmer CTS #8

une 12, 2016

10

V V is te

n-

#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7,

Nee

Intercto Mi

IntercMichi

ds Assessment Rep

S

connections ichigan U.S.

Tran

connection to gan U.S. B3N

To Lauzon TS

GEn

port - Chatham-Ken

St Clair Power CGS

CTS #5

CTS #1

CTS #2

CTS #3

nsAlta Sarnia CGS

CTS #8

Kent TS

East Lake St. Clair Wind Farm

Greenfield ergy Centre

GSPC CGS

South Kent Wind Farm

To Lauzon

TS

Nova

Fig

nt/Lambton/Sarnia

Scott TS

N21W

CTS #4

Lambton TS

V41N

V43N

L23N

L27V

L25V

L28C

L29C

N22W

N6S

N7S

C

N1S

N

Chatham SS

C21J

C22J

C23Z

C24Z

S47

L4D

L51D

Erie

L37G

L38G

C31

a SS

gure 2: Single-L

a Region

L24L

L26L

TS #7

N4S

N6C

N7

St A

Modeland TS

W

Wallaceburg TS

N5K

W44LC

Spence S7C

Spence Wieau Windfarm

K2Z

N.O.

O

Line diagram –

N7C

ndrew TS

Wanstead TS Forest Jura DS

S2N

Longw

SS

ndfarm

W45LS

ngoing Project

– Chatham-Ke

June 12, 201

S

N

ood TS

To Bruce

B56

2L

B5

63L

Duart TS

nt/Lambton/Sa

16

Wond

CTS #6

W42L

W43L

W44

W4

ToN582L

Edgeware TS

LandCG

N.O.

Leg

arnia Region

derland TS

Buch

Strathroy TS

W2S

L

3L

44LC

W45LS

o Nanticoke

Buchanan DESN

don GS

gend

500 kV circuit 230 kV cir115 kV circuit AutotransfNormally Open point Study AreN.O.

Page | 11

hanan TS

rcuitformer

ea

Needs

4 In orfollow

Lfo

IEa.bc.d

H

H

Ain

Table

Gree

Tran

St. C

Gree

Basedsummpeak assesa comconneexisticurre(CAAconveconve

s Assessment R

INPUTS

rder to conwing inform

LDCs providorecast (2015

ESO provide. Historic. List of e. Gas gen. Conserv

(DG) da

Hydro One (T

Hydro One (T

Any relevantnvestments a

e 3 : Gas-fire

Gas GeneKent/La

enfield Energy

sAlta Sarnia 

lair Power CG

enfield South 

d on the histmer peaking

load and stsment, Wanmplete statiected to the ing Wansteantly being

A ID 2015-5erted to a 2ersion projec

Report - Chatha

S AND DA

nduct this Nmation to Hyd

ded historic5 – 2024)

ed: cal regional cexisting relianeration assuvation and Data

Transmission

Transmission

t planning inare provided

ed generation

erators in Chambton/Sarni

y Centre 

GS 

Power Corpo

torical informregion. As s

tudies condinstead TS haion rebuild. existing Wa

ad TS from tassessed by545). As su

230 kV statict.

am-Kent/Lamb

ATA

Needs Assedro One:

cal summer

coincident pability and oumptions (SeDemand M

n) provided

n) provided

nformation, by Hydro O

n output leve

atham‐a area 

oration (GSPC

mation provsuch, the Neeitions. Furths been identPrior to la

anstead TS athe current

y the IESO uch, the Neeion. Please r

bton/Sarnia Reg

essment, stu

(2012 – 20

peak load andoperational isee Table 3) anagement

transformer,

existing reli

including pOne (Transm

els assumed f

Maximusumm

C) 

ided, Chathaeds Assessm

her, as part otified as reacaunch of thand Hydro O115 kV suppas part its eds Assessmrefer to Sec

gion

udy team p

014) as we

d station nonssues

(CDM) and

, station and

ability and o

lanned transmission) and L

for Needs As

um continuomer outputs (MW) 

1001 

435 

484 

283 

am-Kent/Lamment was conof Hydro Oching end-ofhe Needs AOne had comply to 230 kSystem Imp

ment assumection 6.3 for

articipants

ell as summ

n-coincident

d Distributed

d circuit ratin

operation iss

smission andLDCs

sessment

us  

mbton/Sarninducted base

One’s regularf-life and is

Assessment mmitted to rkV supply. Tpact Assessmed Wansteadr more detai

Jun

Page | 1

provided th

mer gross loa

t peak load

d Generatio

ngs

sues

d distributio

ia Region is ed on summer sustainmenscheduled fostudy, LDC

rebuilding thThe project ment procesd TS will bils about th

e 12, 2016

12

he

ad

on

on

a er nt or Cs he is ss be is

Needs

4.1 L BasedRegio– 202in thefrom Pleas

5 A The f 1. T2. L

p3. F

tr4. T

co5. T

h6. A

foscC

7. Rdu

8. Rre

9. SwfaptrT

s Assessment R

Load Foreca

d on data pon is expecte24. Factoringe Region is 2015 – 2024

se refer to Ap

ASSESSME

following me

The assessmeLoad forecas

eak loads asor the purpo

ransmission The historicaonditions ac

The LDC’s loistorical, ext

Accounting forecast are cenario to id

CDM and DG

A gross analysis fA gross the analys

Review impauring the stu

Review and eplaced at thtation capac

with the statioactor for staower factor,ransformer s

Time Rating

Report – Chatha

ast

provided by ed to grow ag in the conexpected to

4.

ppendix A fo

ENT MET

ethodology a

ent is based osts are provi reference pose of Needconnected in

al peak loadscording to Hoad forecasttreme weathfor (2), (3), developed.

dentify needsG, is analyze

and net nonfor sections 6and net reg

sis for sectioact of any oudy period. assess impa

he end of thecity adequacon’s normal

ations withou, whichever stations in th(LTR).

am-Kent/Lamb

the study tat an averagetributions ofo grow at a

or the load f

THODOLO

and assumpt

on summer pided by the oints.

ds Assessmenndustrial cuss at Hydro O

Hydro One mt is translateer adjusted, (4), and (5

The gross s. Where theed to determi

n-coincident6.1.4 gional coincons 6.1.1 to 6on-going an

act of any cir useful lifecy is assesseplanning su

ut low-voltais more con

his Region i

bton/Sarnia Re

team, the sue rate of appf CDM and n average r

forecasts util

OGY

tions are mad

peak loads.Region’s L

nt, 2014 hisstomers throuOne’s statio

methodologyed into load reference po

5) above, a load foreca

ere are issuesine if the nee

t peak load

ident peak 6.1.3, 6.2.1,nd planned d

critical/majoe such as traned by comp

upply capacitage capacitornservative. Nis determine

egion

ummer grosproximately

DG, the sumrate of appro

lized for this

de in this Ne

LDCs using

storical load ughout the s

ons are adjusy.

growth rateoints.

gross load st is used ts, the net foreds can be d

d forecast w

load foreca6.2.2 and 6.2developmen

or elements nsformers, cparing the nty by assumr banks or thNormal planed by the su

ss coinciden1.3% annualmmer net cooximately 0

s Needs Asse

eeds Assessm

historical 2

levels werestudy periodsted for extr

es and is app

forecast anto develop recast, whichdeferred.

was used to

ast was use2.4

nt projects in

planned/idecables, and stnon–coincide

ming a 90% lathe historicanning supplyummer 10 –

Ju

Page | 1

nt load in thlly from 201oincident loa.2% annuall

essment.

ment:

2015 summe

e assumed fo. reme weathe

plied onto th

nd a net loaa worst cas

h accounts fo

perform th

ed to perform

n the Regio

entified to btations. ent peak loaagging powel low voltag

y capacity foDay Limite

une 12, 2016

13

he 15 ad ly

er

or

er

he

ad se or

he

m

on

be

ad er ge or ed

Needs

10. T

6 R

ThiKen

6.1 6.1.1

The 2study

6.1.2

The 2circu

6.1.3

The circu 6.1.4

A sta

s Assessment R

Transmission

Regional With all demand wnormal raWith one demand wtransformAll voltagResource The systeone elemeWith twoconfiguraThe systeORTAC.

RESULTS

is section snt/Lambton/

Transmis

230 kV a

230/115 kV y period for t

230 kV T

230 kV circit in the Reg

115 kV T

115 kV lineits have adeq

230 kV a

ation capacity

Report – Chatha

n adequacy a

load is set toelements in with equipmange.

element outwith circuit l

mers within thges must beand Transm

em to meet ent out of sero elements oation. em is capab

summarizes /Sarnia Regi

ssion System

and 115 kV

autotransforthe loss of a

Transmission

uits are adegion.

Transmission

es supplyingquate capaci

nd 115 kV C

y assessmen

am-Kent/Lamb

assessment is

o the forecasservice, the

ment loading

t of service, loading withheir 10 – Da within pre

mission Assesload securitrvice, no moout of servi

ble of meeti

the resultson.

m Capacity

Autotransf

rmers (Scottsingle 230/1

n Lines

quate over t

n Lines

g the Regionity over the s

Connection

nt was perfor

bton/Sarnia Re

s primarily b

sted regionale system is g within con

the system ihin their longay LTR.

and post cossment Critety criteria asore than 150 ice, no mor

ing the load

of the Ne

Needs

formers

t TS) supply115 kV autot

the study pe

n are radialstudy period

Facilities

rmed over th

egion

based on the

l coincident to be capab

ntinuous rati

is to be capag term emer

ontingency reria (ORTACs per the OR MW of load

re than 600

d restoration

eds Assessm

ying the Regitransformer

eriod for the

l single circd.

he study peri

following cr

peak load. ble of supplings and vo

able of supplrgency (LTE

ranges as peC). RTAC, specd is lost by cMW of loa

n timeframe

ment in the

ion are adeqin the Regio

e loss of a s

cuit lines. T

iod for the 23

Ju

Page | 1

riteria:

lying forecaoltages withi

lying forecaE) ratings an

er the Ontari

cifically, witconfigurationad is lost b

es as per th

e Chatham–

quate over thon.

ingle 230 kV

These 115 kV

30 kV and

une 12, 2016

14

st in

st nd

io

th n.

by

he

–

he

V

V

Needs

115 kload f Kent forec All thwithi 6.2 6.2.1 Basedin–seare wGreen Basedresultcurtawithi

Basedresultcurtawithi There 6.2.2 BasedWond240 Mcan buse oloss choursload transf

s Assessment R

kV transformforecasts.

TS T3/T4 iast (approxi

he other TSin their norm

System R

Load Sec

d on the groervice and cowithin applicnfield Energ

d on the grot in load inilment or byin their appli

d on the grot in load inilment or byin their appli

efore, load s

Load Res

d on the gderland TS, MW for the be sectionaliof existing scan be reducs. The remaitransfers an

former stati

Report – Chatha

mer stations i

is forecastedmately 119%

s in the Chamal supply ca

Reliability, O

curity

oss regional coincident witcable ratingsgy Centre un

oss regionalnterruption gy load rejecicable rating

oss regional nterruption gy load rejecicable rating

ecurity crite

storation

gross coinciby the end oloss of doub

ized and loaswitches on ced from theining load cand/or switchions. Hydro

am-Kent/Lamb

in the Regio

d to exceed i% Summer 1

atham-Kent/apacity durin

Operation a

coincident pth an outages. The largeit on the 230

l-coincident greater thanction. In ads.

coincident greater thanction. In ads.

eria for the R

ident load of study perble-circuit 2

ad can be reN21W. Wit

e peak level an be resupphing alternao One will

bton/Sarnia Re

on using the

its 10 – Day10 – Day LT

/Lambton/Sang the study

and Restorat

peak load fore of the largeest local gen0 kV.

load forecan 150 MW dition, unde

load forecasn 600 MW dition, unde

Region are m

forecast at riod, the load230 kV line Nstored from th the switcof over 240

plied within tate feeder su

continue to

egion

summer stat

y LTR in 20TR in 2016).

arnia Regionperiod.

tion Review

recast, with est local genneration unit

ast, the loss by configu

er these con

st, the loss oby configu

er these con

met.

Modeland d interruptedN21W and Neither Scott

hing capabi0 MW to lesthe 4-8 hourupplies to no monitor

tion non- co

016 based on

n is forecast

w

all transmiseration unitst is a 230 k

of one elemuration, by pnditions, all

of two elemuration, by pnditions, all

TS, Wanstd is expectedN22W. Prest TS or Bucilities, magnss than 150 Mrs timeframeneighbouringload growth

Ju

Page | 1

oincident pea

n the net loa

ted to remai

sion facilities, all facilitiekV–connecte

ment will noplanned loafacilities ar

ments will noplanned loafacilities ar

tead TS and to approacsently, N21Wchanan TS bnitude of loaMW within e by means og, unaffecteh at station

une 12, 2016

15

ak

ad

in

es es ed

ot ad re

ot ad re

nd ch W by ad 4

of ed ns

Needs

conneappro Basedconnedoubto rerestoremer There 6.2.3 Undetransf 6.2.4 BasedpowecombcouldproviSectithrouthe infired systemthe bstudylarge 6.3 Hydrplannvoltarefurbin 20One

s Assessment R

ected to N2opriate.

d on the asected to N6le-circuit 23

espond as quration critergency suppl

efore, load re

Voltage P

er gross regiformer statio

Bulk Pow

d on the stuer system in bined-cycle gd vary depenince or availon 3.1, the

ugh interconnnterties havegeneration

m performabulk system y, Hydro On

transmissio

Aging Inf

ro One revined for the ge cables. Abished, with

018. Prior tohad discuss

Report – Chatha

21W/N22W

sumed load 6S and N7S,30kV line N6uickly as pria. It is they for essenti

estoration cr

Performanc

ional coincions in the reg

wer System

udy assumptthe Region.gas plants in

nding on brolability of otChatham-Kenections in S

e a significanoutput and nce for this adequacy une will work n connected

frastructure

ewed the sureplacemen

As mentionh standard 50o launch of ted and com

am-Kent/Lamb

and update

levels for t, the load in6S and N7S.

possible to re customer’ial load or ar

riteria for the

ce

dent peak logion meet M

Performanc

tions listed It is notedn the Sarnia

oader systemther generatient/LambtonSarnia and Lnt impact on import/expoRegion, the

nder differenwith the IES

d industrial cu

e and Repla

ustainment nt of any auned in earlie0/66/83 MVAthis study, th

mmitted to c

bton/Sarnia Re

e the restor

the transmisnterrupted w. Hydro Onerestore loads accountab

rrange for ba

e Region are

oad conditioMarket Rule r

ce in the Re

in Section that, howeve

a-Lambton am conditions

ion resourcen/Sarnia RegLambton. Im

the bulk traort levels aree IESO mignt system coSO and solicustomers as

acement Pla

and developutotransformer section, A transformehe LDCs conconverting t

egion

ration plan

ssion-connecwill exceed e crews locad to meet thbility to ensackup supply

e met.

ons, post-corequirement

egion

4, no issueer, there arearea and gassuch as exp

es. Moreovergion is conn

mport and expansmission se important

ght undertakeonditions. Acit inputs frorequired.

an of Major

pment initiamers, power

the existingers and is scnnecting to Wthe station f

on an ongo

cted industri150 MW fo

ated in Sarniahe 4 hours sure that thy from other

ontingency vs.

was identife a number os-fired generpected load gr, as previounected to theport generatystem. Recoparameters

e further stuAt the launchom other ent

r Equipmen

atives that atransformer

g Wanstead cheduled to bWanstead Tfrom 115 kV

Ju

Page | 1

oing basis a

ial customeror the loss oa will be abland 8 hour

here is onsitr sources.

voltage at a

fied for bulkof large scalration outpugrowth in thusly noted ine US markeion levels on

ognizing gasfor the bulk

udy to assesh of the saidtities such a

t

are currentlyrs and high

TS will bebe completedS and Hydro

V to 230 kV

une 12, 2016

16

as

rs of le rs te

l l

k e

ut e n et n s-k s d

as

y h-e d o V

Needs

conneinclu The study

Tt

Tf

7 R

BasAss Forregrecteamloc

8 R i) P

Rii) IE

s Assessment R

ecting to 23ded this com

following suy, but are inc

The existingtransformers

The existingfor-like with

RECOMM

sed on the fsessment is n

r thermal ogional supplyommendatiom recommenal plan (“Ke

REFEREN

lanning ProcRegional InfrESO Ontario

Report – Chatha

30 kV circummitted proje

ustainment cluded for co

g St Andrews and is sche

g Scott TS wh a 250MVA

MENDATIO

findings of tnot required

verload of y capacity toon that no funds Hydro O

ent TS – T3 C

NCES

cess Workinrastructure Po Resource a

am-Kent/Lamb

uits N21W aect in the are

plans do noompleteness:

ws TS will duled to be c

will be refurbA unit and is

ONS

the Needs Aat this time.

transformer o accommodurther regionOne transmiCapacity Lim

ng Group (PPlanning in O

and Transmis

bton/Sarnia Re

and N22W. ea network s

ot affect the:

be refurbiscompleted in

bished, autotscheduled to

Assessment, t.

T3 at Kentdate expectednal coordinassion and thmitation”) fo

PWG) ReporOntario – Massion Assess

egion

The Needssetup.

e results of

shed with sn 2023.

transformer To be complet

the study te

t TS, considd load growtation is requhe relevant dor this need.

rt to the Boaay 17, 2013sment Criter

s Assessmen

this Needs

standard 50/

T5 will be rted in 2022.

eam agrees t

dering there th, it is the suired. Furthedistributors t

ard: The Proc

ria (ORTAC)

Ju

Page | 1

nt study had

Assessmen

/66/83 MVA

replaced like

that Scoping

is adequatestudy team’ser, the studyto develop a

cess for

) – Issue 5.0

une 12, 2016

17

d

nt

A

e-

g

e s y a

0

Needs

APP

As ngenerdetermKent/reduc

Table

The Dthe IFurthpeak

CDM

s Assessment R

PENDIX A

noted in Secration (DG)mine the ne/ Lambton/Sction applied

e 4 : CDM fo

DG informatESO in the

her, the DG idemand.

2015

M 0.96%

Report - Chatha

A: LOAD F

ction 5, cons) projects foet load foreSarnia area d to gross pe

orecast for th

tion shown iChatham –

information

2016 201

2.04% 2.74

am-Kent/Lamb

FORECAS

servation anforecast infocast. The fois summarizak demand a

he Chatham-

in Table 5 a– Kent/Lambrepresents th

17 2018

4% 3.84%

bton/Sarnia Reg

STS

nd demand mormation proorecasted CDzed in Tableat each statio

Kent/Lambt

and Table 6bton/Sarnia he cumulativ

2019 20

4.86% 5.6

gion

managementovided by tDM achievee 4 and it ron.

ton/Sarnia R

reflects all area: FIT,

ve, effective

020 2021

68% 6.25%

t (CDM) anthe IESO wement in threpresents th

Region

generation cmicroFIT a

e capacity to

2022 2

6.83% 7.

Jun

Page | 1

nd distributewere used t

he Chatham he percentag

contracts witand CHPSOPo meeting are

2023 2024

.22% 7.72%

e 12, 2016

18

ed to –

ge

th P. ea

Nee

Tab

ds Assessment Rep

ble 5: Chatham-K

Station

Duart TS

Duart TS

Duart TS

Duart TS

Forest Jura DS

Forest Jura DS

Forest Jura DS

Forest Jura DS

Kent TS T1/T2

Kent TS T1/T2

Kent TS T1/T2

Kent TS T1/T2

Kent TS T3/T4

Kent TS T3/T4

Kent TS T3/T4

Kent TS T3/T4

Lambton TS

Lambton TS

Lambton TS

Lambton TS

Modeland TS

Modeland TS

Modeland TS

Modeland TS

St. Andrews TS

St. Andrews TS

St. Andrews TS

St. Andrews TS

Wallaceburg TS

Wallaceburg TS

Wallaceburg TS

Wallaceburg TS

Wanstead TS

Wanstead TS

Wanstead TS

Wanstead TS

CTS #1

CTS #2

CTS #3

CTS #4

CTS #5

CTS #6

CTS #7

CTS #8

port - Chatham-Ken

Kent/Lambton/S

Data

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Coincidental Gro

Coincidental C

DG

Coincidental Ne

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

nt/Lambton/Sarnia

Sarnia regional cHistorical

2014

ss Load

CDM

et Load 14.46

ss Load

CDM

et Load 19.36

ss Load

CDM

et Load 69.45

ss Load

CDM

et Load 39.95

ss Load

CDM

et Load 61.64

ss Load

CDM

et Load 82.59

ss Load

CDM

et Load 63.59

ss Load

CDM

et Load 27.05

ss Load

CDM

et Load 28.24

ustrial Customer 7.94

ustrial Customer 20.82

ustrial Customer 29.00

ustrial Customer 112.95

ustrial Customer 30.89

ustrial Customer 2.47

ustrial Customer 53.89

ustrial Customer 46.71

a Region

coincidental loadl

2015 2016 2

14.66 14.87 1

0.14 0.30

0.07 0.07

14.45 14.50 1

19.69 20.03 2

0.19 0.41

0.02 0.02

19.49 19.60 1

71.05 72.70 7

0.68 1.48

0.53 1.20

69.84 70.01 7

40.82 41.72 4

0.39 0.85

0.16 0.16

40.27 40.71 4

62.25 62.87 6

0.60 1.28

0.00 0.00

61.66 61.59 6

82.93 83.27 8

0.80 1.70

0.02 0.16

82.11 81.41 8

63.59 63.59 6

0.61 1.30

0.01 0.01

62.98 62.29 6

27.67 28.32 2

0.27 0.58

0.43 0.94

26.98 26.80 2

28.70 29.17 2

0.28 0.60

0.38 0.38

28.05 28.20 2

7.94 7.94

20.82 20.82 2

29.00 29.00 2

112.95 112.95 1

30.89 30.89 3

2.47 2.47

53.89 53.89 5

46.71 46.71 4

d forecast 2017 2018 2019

15.09 15.30 15.52

0.41 0.59 0.75

0.25 0.25 0.25

14.42 14.46 14.52

20.37 20.72 21.07

0.56 0.80 1.02

0.02 0.02 0.02

19.80 19.91 20.03

74.38 76.11 77.88

2.04 2.92 3.78

1.20 1.20 1.20

71.14 71.98 72.90

42.64 43.58 44.55

1.17 1.67 2.16

0.16 0.16 0.16

41.31 41.75 42.23

63.49 64.12 64.76

1.74 2.46 3.14

0.00 0.00 0.00

61.75 61.66 61.61

83.61 83.96 84.30

2.29 3.22 4.09

0.16 0.16 0.16

81.16 80.57 80.05

63.59 63.59 63.59

1.74 2.44 3.09

0.01 0.01 0.01

61.84 61.14 60.50

28.97 29.65 30.34

0.79 1.14 1.47

0.94 0.94 0.94

27.24 27.57 27.93

29.65 30.14 30.63

0.81 1.16 1.49

0.38 0.38 0.38

28.46 28.60 28.76

7.94 7.94 7.94

20.82 20.82 20.82

29.00 29.00 29.00

12.95 112.95 112.95

30.89 30.89 30.89

2.47 2.47 2.47

53.89 53.89 53.89

46.71 46.71 46.71

F

June 12, 201

9 2020 2021

2 15.74 15.97

0.89 1.00

0.25 0.25

2 14.60 14.72

7 21.43 21.80

1.22 1.36

0.02 0.02

3 20.20 20.42

8 79.70 81.56

4.53 5.10

1.20 1.20

0 73.96 75.25

5 45.54 46.56

2.59 2.91

0.16 0.16

3 42.79 43.49

6 65.40 66.05

3.72 4.13

0.00 0.00

1 61.68 61.92

0 84.65 84.99

4.81 5.32

0.16 0.16

5 79.67 79.52

9 63.59 63.59

3.61 3.98

0.01 0.01

0 59.97 59.61

4 31.04 31.76

1.76 1.99

6.09 6.09

3 23.18 23.68

3 31.13 31.64

1.77 1.98

0.38 0.38

6 28.98 29.28

7.94 7.94

2 20.82 20.82

0 29.00 29.00

5 112.95 112.95

9 30.89 30.89

2.47 2.47

9 53.89 53.89

1 46.71 46.71

orecast

16

2022 2023 20

16.20 16.43 16.

1.11 1.19 1.2

0.25 0.25 0.2

14.84 14.99 15.

22.17 22.55 22.

1.51 1.63 1.7

0.02 0.02 0.0

20.64 20.90 21.

83.46 85.42 87.

5.70 6.16 6.7

1.20 1.20 1.2

76.56 78.05 79.

47.60 48.67 49.

3.25 3.51 3.8

0.16 0.16 0.1

44.19 45.00 45.

66.70 67.36 68.

4.55 4.86 5.2

0.00 0.00 0.0

62.15 62.50 62.

85.34 85.69 86.

5.82 6.18 6.6

0.16 0.16 0.1

79.36 79.35 79.

63.59 63.59 63.

4.34 4.59 4.9

0.01 0.01 0.0

59.25 59.00 58.

32.50 33.25 34.

2.22 2.40 2.6

6.09 6.09 6.0

24.19 24.76 25.

32.16 32.69 33.

2.20 2.36 2.5

0.38 0.38 0.3

29.59 29.95 30.

7.94 7.94 7.9

20.82 20.82 20.

29.00 29.00 29.

112.95 112.95 112

30.89 30.89 30.

2.47 2.47 2.4

53.89 53.89 53.

46.71 46.71 46.

024

.66

29

25

.12

.93

77

02

.14

.42

75

20

.47

.76

84

16

.76

.03

25

00

.78

.04

64

16

.24

.59

91

01

.68

.03

63

09

.31

.22

56

38

.28

94

.82

.00

2.95

.89

47

.89

.71

Page | 19

Nee

Tab

ds Assessment Rep

ble 6 : Chatham-

Station

Duart TS

Duart TS

Duart TS

Duart TS

Forest Jura DS

Forest Jura DS

Forest Jura DS

Forest Jura DS

Kent TS T1/T2

Kent TS T1/T2

Kent TS T1/T2

Kent TS T1/T2

Kent TS T3/T4

Kent TS T3/T4

Kent TS T3/T4

Kent TS T3/T4

Lambton TS

Lambton TS

Lambton TS

Lambton TS

Modeland TS

Modeland TS

Modeland TS

Modeland TS

St. Andrews TS

St. Andrews TS

St. Andrews TS

St. Andrews TS

Wallaceburg TS

Wallaceburg TS

Wallaceburg TS

Wallaceburg TS

Wanstead TS

Wanstead TS

Wanstead TS

Wanstead TS

CTS #1

CTS #2

CTS #3

CTS #4

CTS #5

CTS #6

CTS #7

CTS #8

port – Chatham-Ke

-Kent/Lambton/

Data

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Non‐coincidental G

Non‐coincidenta

DG

Non‐coincidental 

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

Transmission Connected Ind

ent/Lambton/Sarnia

/Sarnia regional

Historica

2014

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 14.46

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 19.36

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 69.45

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 39.95

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 61.64

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 82.59

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 63.59

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 27.05

Gross Load

al CDM

Net Load 28.24

dustrial Customer 7.94

dustrial Customer 20.82

dustrial Customer 29.00

dustrial Customer 112.95

dustrial Customer 30.89

dustrial Customer 2.47

dustrial Customer 53.89

dustrial Customer 46.71

a Region

non-coincidenta

al

2015 2016

18.26 18.55

0.18 0.38

0.07 0.07

18.01 18.10

22.58 23.05

0.22 0.47

0.02 0.02

22.35 22.56

107.57 114.81 1

1.03 2.34

0.53 1.20

106.00 111.26 1

61.87 65.59

0.59 1.34

0.16 0.16

61.11 64.08

71.39 72.21

0.69 1.47

0.00 0.00

70.71 70.73

100.71 101.71 1

0.97 2.08

0.02 0.16

99.72 99.48

62.74 62.74

0.60 1.28

0.01 0.01

62.13 61.46

41.86 42.84

0.40 0.87

0.43 0.94

41.04 41.03

34.10 34.68

0.33 0.71

0.38 0.38

33.40 33.59

7.94 7.94

20.82 20.82

29.00 29.00

112.95 112.95 1

30.89 30.89

2.47 2.47

53.89 53.89

46.71 46.71

al load forecast

2017 2018 201

18.72 18.97 19.3

0.51 0.73 0.94

0.25 0.25 0.25

17.96 17.99 18.1

23.29 23.70 24.1

0.64 0.91 1.17

0.02 0.02 0.02

22.63 22.77 23.0

117.04 119.46 122.1

3.21 4.59 5.93

1.20 1.20 1.20

112.63 113.66 115.0

66.79 68.11 69.6

1.83 2.62 3.38

0.16 0.16 0.16

64.80 65.33 66.0

72.55 73.18 74.2

1.99 2.81 3.61

0.00 0.00 0.00

70.56 70.37 70.6

102.71 103.71 104.7

2.81 3.98 5.08

0.16 0.16 0.16

99.74 99.57 99.4

62.74 62.74 62.7

1.72 2.41 3.05

0.01 0.01 0.01

61.02 60.33 59.6

43.86 44.80 45.8

1.20 1.72 2.23

0.94 0.94 0.94

41.72 42.15 42.6

35.29 35.68 36.2

0.97 1.37 1.76

0.38 0.38 0.38

33.95 33.94 34.0

7.94 7.94 7.94

20.82 20.82 20.8

29.00 29.00 29.0

112.95 112.95 112.9

30.89 30.89 30.8

2.47 2.47 2.47

53.89 53.89 53.8

46.71 46.71 46.7

June 12, 2

9 2020 2021

33 19.69 19.94

4 1.12 1.25

5 0.25 0.25

14 18.32 18.44

19 24.75 25.09

7 1.41 1.57

2 0.02 0.02

00 23.33 23.51

16 124.89 127.48

3 7.10 7.97

0 1.20 1.20

02 116.58 118.30

62 71.14 72.55

8 4.04 4.54

6 0.16 0.16

08 66.93 67.85

29 75.37 76.00

1 4.28 4.75

0 0.00 0.00

68 71.09 71.25

71 104.71 104.71

8 5.95 6.55

6 0.16 0.16

47 98.60 98.00

74 62.74 62.74

5 3.57 3.92

1 0.01 0.01

69 59.17 58.81

82 46.95 48.10

3 2.67 3.01

4 6.09 6.09

66 38.19 39.00

22 36.99 37.75

6 2.10 2.36

8 0.38 0.38

08 34.51 35.01

4 7.94 7.94

82 20.82 20.82

00 29.00 29.00

95 112.95 112.95

89 30.89 30.89

7 2.47 2.47

89 53.89 53.89

71 46.71 46.71

Forecast

2016

2022 2023 2

20.19 20.43 2

1.38 1.47 1

0.25 0.25 0

18.56 18.71 1

25.50 25.82 2

1.74 1.86 2

0.02 0.02 0

23.75 23.94 24

130.10 132.77 13

8.88 9.58 1

1.20 1.20 1

120.02 121.98 12

73.98 75.42 7

5.05 5.44 5

0.16 0.16 0

68.76 69.82 7

76.60 77.15 7

5.23 5.57 6

0.00 0.00 0

71.37 71.59 7

104.71 104.71 10

7.15 7.56 8

0.16 0.16 0

97.40 97.00 9

62.74 62.74 6

4.28 4.53 4

0.01 0.01 0

58.45 58.21 5

49.19 50.28 5

3.36 3.63 3

6.09 6.09 6

39.74 40.56 4

38.30 38.83 3

2.61 2.80 3

0.38 0.38 0

35.31 35.65 3

7.94 7.94 7

20.82 20.82 2

29.00 29.00 2

112.95 112.95 11

30.89 30.89 3

2.47 2.47 2

53.89 53.89 5

46.71 46.71 4

2024

0.68

1.60

0.25

8.83

6.22

2.02

0.02

4.18

35.49

0.46

1.20

23.83

6.90

5.93

0.16

0.81

7.72

6.00

0.00

1.72

04.71

8.08

0.16

6.47

2.74

4.84

0.01

7.90

1.40

3.97

6.09

1.34

9.34

3.04

0.38

5.93

7.94

0.82

9.00

12.95

0.89

2.47

3.89

6.71

Page | 20

Needs

APP Key t NormThe munderwoul CoinThe etotal ContThe pnot av ConsProgruse ocusto DistrElectgener GrosAmoudelivusual LimiA hig LoadPredi

s Assessment R

PENDIX B

terms and de

mal Supply maximum lor nominal ad be expecte

cident Peakelectricity ddemand of t

tingency prevalence ovailable.

servation anrams aimed of another toomers’ use of

ributed Gentric power gration capaci

ss Load unt of electery losses, nlly expressed

ited Time Rgher than nam

d Forecast iction of the

Report - Chatha

B: KEY TE

efinitions ass

Capacity oading that

ambient conded.

k Load demand at inhe region or

of abnormal

nd Demand at using moo reduce ovf electricity.

neration (DGgeneration eity typically

tricity that mnot considerd in MW or M

Rating (LTRmeplate ratin

load or dem

am-Kent/Lamb

ERMS AND

sociated with

electrical eqditions such

ndividual facr system is at

conditions

Managemeore of one tyverall energy

G) equipment tranging from

must be genring any genMVA.

R) ng that a tran

mand custome

bton/Sarnia Reg

D DEFINI

h this Needs

quipment mah that no acc

cilities at tht its maximu

such that el

ent (CDM)ype of energy use, and i

that suppliesm a few kW

nerated to mneration init

nsformer can

ers will mak

gion

ITIONS

s Assessmen

ay be subjeccelerated los

he same poinum.

lements of th

gy efficientlyinfluencing

s energy toW to 25 MW.

meet all custtiatives such

n tolerate for

ke on the elec

nt are cited h

cted to contss of equipm

nt in time w

he power sy

y to replace the amount

o nearby cu

tomers’ needh as CDM a

r a short per

ctricity syste

Jun

Page | 2

ere.

tinuously ment life

when the

ystem are

an inefficienor timing o

ustomers wit

ds as well aand DG. It

iod of time

em

e 12, 2016

21

nt of

th

as is

Needs

Net LNet o Non-The mnon-c PeakThe mof timdesig WeatLoadfactor

s Assessment R

Load of generation

-Coincident maximum ecoincident pe

k Load maximum lome. It may bgnated interv

ther Correcd data that is r.

Report – Chatha

n (e.g. CDM

Peak Loadlectricity deeaks may oc

oad consumee the maxim

val of time.

cted Data adjusted to

am-Kent/Lamb

and DG) de

d emand at anccur at differ

ed or producmum instanta

account for

bton/Sarnia Re

educted from

individual rent times fo

ced by a unianeous load

extreme we

egion

m the Gross l

facility. Unor different fa

it or group oor the maxim

eather condit

load

nlike the coinfacilities.

of units in a mum averag

tions using a

Ju

Page | 2

ncident peak

stated perioge load over

an adjustmen

une 12, 2016

22

k,

od a

nt

Needs

APP BES BPS CDMCIA CGS CTS DESNDG DSC GTAIESOIRRPkV LDC LTR LV MW MVANA NERNGS NPCCOEB ORTAPF PPWRIP SIA SS TS TSC ULTC

s Assessment R

PENDIX C

Bu Bu

M Co Cu Cu Cu

N Du Di Di

A GrO InP In

Ki Lo Li Lo M

A M Ne

C No Nu

C No On

AC On Po

WG Pl Re Sy Sw Tr Tr

C Un

Report – Chatha

C: ACRON

ulk Electric ulk Power Syonservation ustomer Impustomer Genustomer Tranual Element istributed Geistribution Sreater Toron

ndependent Entegrated Regilovolt ocal Distribuimited Time ow-voltage

Megawatt Mega Volt-Am

eeds Assessmorth Americuclear Generortheast Powntario Energntario Resouower Factor lanning Procegional Infraystem Impacwitching Staransformer Sransmission nder Load T

am-Kent/Lamb

NYMS

System ystem and Demand

pact Assessmnerating Statnsformer StaSpot Netwo

eneration System Codento Area Electricity Sygional Resou

ution CompaRating

mpere ment an Electric Rrating Statio

wer Coordinagy Board urce and Tra

cess Workingastructure Plct Assessmenation Station System Cod

Tap Changer

bton/Sarnia Re

d Managemement tion ation ork

e

ystem Operaurce Plannin

any

Reliability Con ating Counci

ansmission A

g Group lanning nt

de

egion

ent

ator ng

Corporation

il Inc.

Assessment C

Criteria

Ju

Page | 2

une 12, 2016

23