HNebraska Public Power District

Always there-when you need us

NLS2012134December 17, 2012

ATTN: Document Control DeskDirector, Division of Spent Fuel Storageand Transportation

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D.C. 20555-0001

Subject: Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Decommissioning Funding PlanCooper Nuclear Station, Docket No. 50-298, DPR-46Cooper Nuclear Station ISFSI, Docket No. 72-66

Dear Sir or Madam:

The purpose of this correspondence is to provide Nebraska Public Power District's IndependentSpent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Decommissioning Funding Plan for Cooper NuclearStation (CNS) in accordance with 10 CFR 72.30, Financial Assurance and Recordkeeping forDecommissioning. The enclosure to this letter provides a detailed cost estimate fordecommissioning the ISFSI at CNS in an amount reflecting the work is performed by anindependent contractor, an adequate contingency factor, and release of the facility and the drystorage system for unrestricted use, as specified in 10 CFR Part 20.1402.

Additionally, the enclosure provides identification of the key assumptions contained in the costestimate and also the volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity, ifany, that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination.

The enclosure also presents information related to demonstrating the adequacy ofdecommissioning funding for ultimate ISFSI decommissioning.

Finally, attached is the certification required pursuant to 10 CFR 72.3 0(b)(6) that financialassurance for decommissioning has been provided in the amount of the cost estimate fordecommissioning.

This letter contains no new regulatory commitments.

COOPER NUCLEAR STATIONP.O. Box 98 / Brownville, NE 68327-0098

Telephone: (402) 825-3811 / Fax: (402) 825-5211w .nppd.com

NLS2012134Page 2 of 2

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (402) 825-2904.

Sincerely,

pavid W. Van Der KtaLicensing Manager

/jo

Attachment: Certification of Financial AssuranceEnclosure: 10 CFR ISFSI Decommissioning Cost Estimate

cc: Regional Administrator w/ attachment and enclosureUSNRC - Region IV

Cooper Project Manager w/ attachment and enclosureUSNRC - NRR Project Directorate IV-1

Senior Resident Inspector w/ attachment and enclosure

USNRC - CNS

NPG Distribution w/o attachment and enclosure

CNS Records w/ attachment and enclosure

NLS2012134AttachmentPage 1 of 2

Attachment

Certification of Financial Assurance

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE

NRC License: DPR-46

Nebraska Public Power DistrictCooper Nuclear StationP.O. Box 9872676 648 ABrownville NE 68321

Issued to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Subject: Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

Certification:

I hereby certify that Nebraska Public Power District is the licenseeIndependent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (Cooper ISFSI), and thatprovide this Certification of Financial Assurance with respect to theISFSI.

for the Cooper Nuclear Stationthe undersigned is authorized todecommissioning of the Cooper

During the operation of this ISFSI spent nuclear fuel will be stored in storage casks licensed under 10CFR Part 72. Pursuant to contracts with the Department of Energy the spent fuel and casks willultimately be removed from the ISFSI location, at which time the ISFSI will be decommissioned inaccordance with NRC regulations.

I further certify that financial assurance in an amount sufficient to fund ISFSI decommissioning at thetime of such decommissioning exists, as described in the Enclosure to the letter to which this Certificationis attached. That amount is premised on a site-specific decommissioning cost estimate provided in thatEnclosure.

Cooper Nuclear Station ISFSI $ 3,702,000 (inclusive of contingency)

Corporate Seal

Name "-Td L.

Title: Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Date - /Z/- Q0 / .,'

NLS2012134EnclosurePage 1 of 12

Enclosure

Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Decommissioning Funding PlanCooper Nuclear Station, Docket No. 50-298, DPR-46

Cooper Nuclear Station ISFSI, Docket No. 72-66

10 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Cost Estimate

10 CFR 72.30 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan

Background and Introduction

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued its final rule on DecommissioningPlanning on June 17, 201 1,1 with the rule becoming effective on December 17, 2012.Subpart 72.30, "Financial assurance and recordkeeping for decommissioning," requiresthat each holder of, or applicant for, a license under this part must submit for NRC reviewand approval a decommissioning funding plan that contains information on howreasonable assurance will be provided that funds will be available to decommission theIndependent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI).

In accordance with the rule, this enclosure provides a detailed cost estimate fordecommissioning the ISFSI at Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) in an amount reflecting:

1. The work is performed by an independent contractor;

2. An adequate contingency factor; and

3. Release of the facility and dry storage systems for unrestricted use, as specified in 10CFR Part 20.1402

This enclosure also provides:

1. Identification of the key assumptions contained in the cost estimate; and

2. The volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity, if any,that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination.

Finally, in Section 7 of this enclosure, Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) provides adescription of the method of assuring funds for decommissioning the ISFSI, includingmeans for adjusting the cost estimate and associated funding levels over the life of theplant.

The material in Sections 1 - 6, and Tables 1 and 2, herein, were prepared based onevaluations conducted by TLG Services, Inc. Section 7, containing the financialassurance information, was prepared by NPPD.

2. Spent Fuel Management Strategy

The operating license for CNS is currently set to expire on January 18, 2034. With theanticipation of an extended power uprate, approximately 6,114 spent fuel assemblies arecurrently projected to be generated over the life of the plant. Because of the breach by the

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70 and 72 "Decommissioning Planning,"Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 76, Number 117 (p 35512 et seq.), June 17, 2011

1

Department of Energy (DOE) of its contract to remove fuel from the site, an ISFSI hasbeen constructed and spent fuel transferred to dry storage modules located on the ISFSI, tosupport continued plant operations. Based upon the current projection of the DOE's abilityto remove spent fuel from the site, this estimate assumes that the current ISFSI will beexpanded after shutdown to store the used fuel that remained in the spent fuel pool in orderto support plant decommissioning. The ISFSI is operated under a Part 50 General License(in accordance with 10 CFR 72, Subpart K[2I).

Because of the DOE's breach, it is envisioned that the spent fuel pool will contain asignificant number of spent fuel assemblies at the time of expiration of the currentoperating license in 2034, assuming the plant operates to that date, including assembliesoff-loaded from the reactor vessel. To facilitate immediate dismantling operations orsafe-storage operations, the fuel that cannot be transferred directly to the DOE from thepool is assumed to be packaged in dry storage modules for interim storage at the ISFSI.Once the spent fuel pool is emptied, the spent fuel pool systems and fuel pool areas canbe either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage.

Completion of the ISFSI decommissioning process is dependent upon the DOE's abilityto remove spent fuel from the site. DOE's repository program assumes that spent fuelallocations will be accepted for disposal from the nation's commercial nuclear plants,with limited exceptions, in the order (the "queue") in which it was discharged from thereactor. [3] NPPD's current spent fuel management plan for the CNS spent fuel is based ingeneral upon: 1) a 2020 start date for DOE initiating transfer of commercial spent fuel toa federal facility (not necessarily a final repository), and 2) expectations for spent fuelreceipt by the DOE for the CNS fuel. The DOE's generator allocation/receipt schedules arebased upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority. Assuming a maximum rate oftransfer of 3,000 metric tons of uranium/year,[4] the spent fuel is projected to be fullyremoved from the CNS site in 2063. This also assumes that the 1,054 spent fuel assembliesNPPD has in storage at General Electric's wet-pool ISFSI in Morris, Illinois are shippedfirst, starting in 2022.

NPPD believes that one or more monitored retrievable storage facilities could be put intoplace within a reasonable time. In a report delivered to Congress in 2009,E51 DOEpresented a six-year timeline for siting and constructing an interim storage facility(pending legislation eliminating the linkage in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 72, Subpart K, "General License for Storage of Spent Fuel atPower Reactor Sites."U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 961.11, Article IV - Responsibilities of the Parties, B. DOEResponsibilities, 5.(a) ... DOE shall issue an annual acceptance priority ranking for receipt of SNF and/or HLWat the DOE repository. This priority ranking shall be based on the age of SNF and/or HLW as calculated fromthe date of discharge of such materials from the civilian nuclear power reactor. The oldest fuel or waste willhave the highest priority for acceptance, except as ... "

4 "Acceptance Priority Ranking & Annual Capacity Report," DOE/RW-0567, July 2004

5 "Report to Congress on the Demonstration of the Interim Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel from DecommissionedNuclear Power Reactor Sites," DOE/RW-0596, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian RadioactiveWaste Management, December 2008

2

amended, between interim storage and the opening of the Yucca Mountain repository).The six-year time span would allow fuel receipt by the 2020 date.

NPPD's position is that the DOE has a contractual obligation to accept the spent fuelearlier than the projections set out above consistent with its contract commitments. Noassumption made in this study should be interpreted to be inconsistent with this claim.

3. ISFSI Decommissioning Strategy

At the conclusion of the spent fuel transfer process the ISFSI will be promptlydecommissioned (similar to the power reactor DECON alternative).

For purposes of providing an estimate for a funding plan, financial assurance is expectedto be provided on the basis of a prompt ISFSI decommissioning scenario. In this estimatethe ISFSI decommissioning is considered an independent project, regardless of thedecommissioning alternative identified for the nuclear power plant.

4. ISFSI Description

The design and capacity of the CNS ISFSI is based upon a NUHOMS®-61BT drystorage system. The NUHOMS® system is comprised of a dry storage canister (DSC)with 61 spent fuel assembly capacity and a horizontal storage module (HSM), Model202. The DSCs are assumed to be transferred directly to the DOE and not returned to thestation. Some of the remaining HSMs are assumed to have residual radioactivity due tosome minor level of neutron-induced activation as a result of the long-term storage of thespent fuel. The cost to dispose of residual radioactivity, and verify that the remainingfacility and surrounding environs meet the NRC's radiological limits established forunrestricted use, form the basis of the ISFSI decommissioning estimate.

NPPD's current spent fuel management plan for the CNS spent fuel would result in 55HSMs being placed on an expanded storage pad at the site. This represents 54% of thetotal spent fuel projected to be generated during the currently licensed operating period.This projected configuration is based upon the 2020 DOE spent fuel program start with a2027 DOE start date for the fuel at the CNS site, a 3,000 MTU / year pickup rate, and a52 module capacity for the ISFSI pad built to support plant operations. This scenariowould allow the spent fuel storage pool to be emptied within approximately five and one-half years following the permanent cessation of operations.

Table 1 provides the significant quantities and physical dimensions used as the basis indeveloping the ISFSI decommissioning estimate.

5. Key Assumptions / Estimating Approach

The decommissioning estimate is based on the configuration of the ISFSI expected afterall spent fuel and GTCC material has been removed from the site. The configuration ofthe ISFSI is based on the station operating until the end of its current license (2034) and

3

the DOE's spent fuel acceptance assumptions, as previously described. For purposes ofthis analysis the current pad (265 feet by 42 feet) will be expanded to accommodate the55 modules.

The dry storage vendor, Transnuclear, Inc., does not expect the horizontal storagemodules to have any interior or exterior radioactive surface contamination.E6] It isexpected that this assumption would be confirmed as a result of good radiologicalpractice of surveying potentially impacted areas after each spent fuel transfer campaign.Any neutron activation of the steel and concrete is expected to be extremely small. 7]

This assumption is adopted for this analysis.

The decommissioning estimate is based on the premise that the DSC support structurewithin some of the HSMs will contain low levels of neutron-induced residualradioactivity that would necessitate remediation at the time of decommissioning. As anallowance, nine of the 55 HSMs are assumed to be affected, i.e., contain residualradioactivity. The allowance quantity is based upon the number of DSCs required for thefinal core off-load (i.e., 548 offloaded assemblies/unit, 61 assemblies per DSC) whichresults in a total of nine HSMs that contain residual radioactivity. It is assumed that theseare the final HSMs offloaded; consequently they have the least time for radioactive decayof the neutron activation products.

It is not expected that there will be any residual contamination left on the concrete ISFSIpad. It is expected that this assumption would be confirmed as a result of goodradiological practice of surveying potentially impacted areas after each spent fuel transfercampaign. Therefore, it is assumed for this analysis that the ISFSI pad will not becontaminated. As such, only verification surveys are included for the pad in thedecommissioning estimate.

There is no known subsurface material in the proximity of the ISFSI containing residualradioactivity that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination.

Decommissioning is assumed to be performed by an independent contractor. As such,essentially all labor, equipment, and material costs are based on national averages, i.e.,costs from national publications such as R.S. Means' Building Construction Cost Data(adjusted for regional variations), and laboratory service costs are based on vendor pricelists. Those craft labor positions that are expected to be provided locally, are consistentwith fully burdened contractor labor rates used in the most recently developed CNSdecommissioning cost estimate, escalated to 2012 dollars. NPPD, as licensee, willoversee the site activities; the estimate includes NPPD's labor and overhead costs.

6 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report for the Standardized NIUHOMS® Horizontal Modular Storage System

for Irradiated Nuclear Fuel, Transnuclear Inc., NUH-003, Rev. 12, at page 3.5-1 dated February 1, 2012,[ML12037A013]

7 Ibid. at page 9.6-1

4

Low-level radioactive waste packaging, transport and disposal costs are based on ratesconsistent with the most recently developed decommissioning cost estimate (year 2008dollars), escalated to 2012 dollars.

Contingency has been added at an overall rate of 25%. This is consistent with thecontingency evaluation criteria referenced by the NRC in NUREG-1757.J81

Costs are reported in 2012 dollars and based upon a decommissioning analysis preparedfor CNS in 2008. Activity costs originally reported in 2008 dollars have been escalated to2012 dollars using the Consumer Price Index, Services.J9'

The estimate is limited to costs necessary to terminate the ISFSI's NRC license and meetthe 10 CFR §20.1402 criteria for unrestricted use. Disposition of released material andstructures is outside the scope of the estimate.

6. Cost Estimate

The estimated cost to decommission the ISFSI and release the facility for unrestricted useis provided in Table 2. The cost has been organized into three phases, including:

" An initial planning phase - empty HSMs are characterized and the specifications andwork procedures for the decontamination (DSC support structure removal) developed.

" The remediation phase - residual radioactivity is removed, packaged in certified wastecontainers, transported to the low-level waste site, and disposed of at low-level waste.

" The final phase - license termination surveys, independent surveys are completed, andan application for license termination submitted.

In addition to the direct costs associated with a contractor providing the decommissioningservices, the estimate also contains costs for the NRC (and NRC contractor to performthe verification survey), NPPD's oversight staff, site security (industrial), and other siteoperating costs.

For estimating purposes it should be conservatively assumed that all expenditures will beincurred following plant decommissioning and all spent fuel removal. Based on bestavailable information, NPPD expects that the DOE will complete the pickup of spent fuelat CNS by 2064.

8 "Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping, and Timeliness," U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, NUREG-1757, Volume3, Revision 1, February 2012Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers, Services, Series ID: CUUR0000SAS

5

7. Financial Assurance

ISFSI operations at CNS are in response to the DOE's failure to remove spent nuclearfuel from the site in a timely manner. The costs for management of the spent fuel arecosts for which the DOE is responsible under federal law and the Standard Contract. It istherefore expected that, once the ISFSI is no longer needed, the cost to decommission theISFSI would be a DOE-reimbursable expense. Until such time that the costs can berecovered from the DOE, NPPD will rely upon the money available in itsdecommissioning trust fund to terminate the ISFSI license and release the facility forunrestricted use.

Using the decommissioning trust fund is reasonable based on the following:

* Although the decommissioning trust fund is for radiological decommissioning (i.e.,post-shutdown) costs only, the ISFSI decommissioning is a radiological cost. Also,to the extent that the trust fund balance exceeds costs required for Part 50 radiologicaldecommissioning, these funds would be available to address costs incurred by NPPD,including ISFSI decommissioning costs.

• The projected minimum certification amount, calculated pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(c)required to demonstrate reasonable assurance of funds for decommissioning CNS is$574,906,000 (2010 dollars), based upon the NRC's latest figures for calculating thatvalue. [

10]

" Based upon CNS's decommissioning trust fund balance as of December 31, 2010 asreported in Nebraska Public Power District's March 29, 2011 DecommissioningFunding Seventh Biennial Report and considering a 2.5% real rate of return[l 11 on thefund between December 31, 2010 and the start of CNS decommissioning the trustfund would contain a $829,041,114 surplus (refer to Table 3) beyond the NRCminimum funding formula provided in 1OCFR50.75(c). This surplus is more thansufficient to complete the future decommissioning of the ISFSI (estimated costprovided in Table 2).

" NPPD will continue to assess the decommissioning fund status in accordance with theNRC requirements (e.g. lOCFR 50.75(b)(2), 1OCFR 50.75(f)(1), 1OCFR72.30(c)) andprojected surplus, to account for the continued assurance of adequate funds for ISFSIdecommissioning. Any adjustments to the cost estimate and funding levels will bemade in connection with the triennial filing required pursuant to 1 OCFR72.30(c). Tothe extent any specific regulatory actions are necessary at the time of withdrawalfrom the trust fund of the amount necessary for ISFSI decommissioning, NPPD willpursue such actions.

10 "Report on Waste Burial Charges," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation, NUREG-1307, Rev. 14, November 2010

11 The assumed annual real rate of return is 2.50 percent. The District's Board of Directors (as the licensee's ratesetting authority) has approved this assumption for the decommissioning funding plan for Cooper NuclearStation through the adoption of a Board Resolution, dated June 13, 2008, as part of its official business.

6

In addition to the projected excess in decommissioning funds that would be availablefor the diminimus level of funding required for ISFSI decommissioning, NPPD couldadditionally rely on its available cash and investments that total over $1 billion(including $346.5 million in liquid assets). This information was provided to theNRC with NPPD's guarantee of deferred premiums, pursuant to 10 CFR 140.21,submitted by letter dated July 3, 2012, "Licensee Guarantees of Payment of DeferredPremiums, Cooper Nuclear Station, Docket No. 50.298, DPR-46.

NPPD provides this information because it further demonstrates the availability offunding to pay for ISFSI decommissioning. NPPD is not here submitting thisinformation in the form of a guarantee under 10 CFR 72.30(e)(2), but may do so inthe future.

7

Table 1Significant Quantities and Physical Dimensions

ISFSI Pad

Item Length (ft) Width (ft) Residual Radioactivity

Current ISFSI Pad 265 42 No

ISFSI Horizontal Storage Module - Model 202

Item Value Notes (all dimensions are nominal)

Outside Height (inches) 222 Without vent cover

Outside Length (inches) 248 Without shield walls

Outside Width (inches) 116 Without shield walls

Quantity (total) 55 Spent FuelEquivalent to the number of HSMs used to store last

Quantity (with residual radioactivity) 9 complete core offload)

DSC Internal Steel with Residual Radioactivity (pounds) 44,000

Low-Level Radioactive Waste (cubic feet) 1,011

Low-Level Radioactive Waste (packaged density) 46 Average weight density

8

Table 2ISFSI Decommissioning Costs and Waste Volumes

WasteVolume(thousands, 2012 dollars) Person-Hours

NRC / NRCRemoval Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total (ft3) Contractor Licensee Contractor

Decommissioning ContractorPlanning (characterization,specs and procedures) - - - 178 178 - 16,646

Remediation(activated metal removal) 187 5 7 220 127 545 1,011 - -

License Termination(radiological surveys) - - - - 1,456 1,456 - 15,734 -

Subtotal 187 5 7 220 1,761 2,180 1,011 32,381 -

Supporting CostsNRC and NRC ContractorFees and Costs - - - - 243 243 - - - 776

Insurance - - - - 94 94 - - -

Security (industrial) - - - - 168 168 - 4,996 -

NPPD Oversight Staff - - - - 277 277 - 3,790 -

Subtotal - - - - 782 782 - 8,786 - 776

Total (w/o contingency) 187 5 7 220 2,543 2,962 1,011 41,167 - 776

Total (w/25% contingency) 234 7 8 275 3,179 3,702

9

Table 3Financial Assurance'

10 CFR 50.75(b) & (c) Decommissioning Estimate (2010 Dollars): $574,906,0002

Decommissioning Fund3 Total as of 12/31/2010: $484,130,065

Schedule of Future Annual Fund Earnings and Decommissioning Cost Escalation: 4

Funding Requirement NRC

Beginning Funding Year-Beginning Fund Ending Minimum

Year Balance Contribution 2034 $ Interest Balance Escalated

2011 $484,130,065 $26,627,154 $510,757,219 $574,906,000

2012 $510,757,219 $28,091,647 $538,848,866 $592,153,180

2013 $538,848,866 $29,636,688 $568,485,553 $609,917,775

2014 $568,485,553 - $31,266,705 $599,752,259 $628,215,309

2015 $599,752,259 $32,986,374 $632,738,633 $647,061,768

2016 $632,738,633 $34,800,625 $667,539,258 $666,473,621

2017 $667,539,258 - $36,714,659 $704,253,917 $686,467,830

2018 $704,253,917 - $38,733,965 $742,987,882 $707,061,864

2019 $742,987,882 $40,864,334 $783,852,216 $728,273,720

2020 $783,852,216 $43,111,872 $826,964,088 $750,121,9322021 $872,447,112 $772,625,590

1 The following table is excerpted from Nebraska Public Power District's March 29, 2011 seventh Biennial Report onFinancial Assurance for Cooper Nuclear Station in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) Reporting and Recordkeeping forDecommissioning Planning and is provided for illustrative purposes. Please also reference related NPPD correspondence to theNRC (NLS2008098 dated December 15, 2008) that provided various decommissioning planning scenarios for Cooper NuclearStation that considered both delayed DECON and SAFSTOR alternatives. Either of those scenarios provides deferred dates forthe decommissioning of Cooper Nuclear Station. With those later dates, NPPD would expect to accrue additional earningsconsistent with the assumed real rate of return for the decommissioning trust fund.

2 This estimate is based upon NRC decommissioning minimum certification escalation requirements in 10 CFR50.75(c)(1) and (2) and guidance per NUREG 1307 for a BWR the size of Cooper Nuclear Station. The calculation utilizes thevendor waste burial factor in Revision 14 of NUREG 1307 and Labor and Energy escalation factors derived from December2010 regional data of the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics.

3 This is the total amount (Market Value) in the external sinking fund (as described in 10 CFR 50.75) to cover the costsof NRC-defined decommissioning. The current (November 30, 2012) Market Value of the external sinking fund is$544,060,055.

4 These figures will be recalculated on an annual basis in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c). The aboveamounts reflect the anticipated annual contributions (none presently anticipated), and annual fund earnings that demonstrate fullfunding of the decommissioning trust by the end of the operating license (license expiration January 18, 2034), and taking intoaccount a pro rata credit during the dismantlement period (recognizing both cash expenditures and earnings) over the first sevenyears after shutdown assuming immediate decommissioning (see 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)).

10

Year

Beginning

Balance$826,964,088

Funding

Contribution

Funding Requirement

Year-Beginning

2034 $

Fund

Interest$45,483,025

Ending

Balance

NRC

Minimum

Escalated

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

2032

2033

2034

2035

2036

2037

2038

2039

2040

$872,447,112

$920,431,704

$971,055,447

$1,024,463,497

$1,080,808,989

$1,140,253,484

$1,202,967,425

$1,269,130,634

$1,338,932,819

$1,412,574,124

$1,490,265,700

$1,572,230,314

$1,658,702,981

$1,573797,056

$1,478,937,265

$1,373,417,627

$1,256,488,575

$1,127,354,412

$985,170,642

$47,984,591

$50,623,744

$53,408,050

$56,345,492

$59,444,494

$62,713,942

$66,163,208

$69,802,185

$73,641,305

$77,691,577

$81,964,614

$86,472,667

$82,046,292

$77,100,995

$71,599,971

$65,504,144

$58,772,031

$51,359,607

$43,220,153

$920,431,704

$971,055,447

$1,024,463,497

$1,080,808,989

$1,140,253,484

$1,202,967,425

$1,269,130,634

$1,338,932,819

$1,412,574,124

$1,490,265,700

$1,572,230,314

$1,658,702,981

$1,573,797,056

$1,478,937,265

$1,373,417,627

$1,256,488,575

$1,127,354,412

$985,170,642

$829,041,114

$795,804,358

$819,678,488

$844,268,843

$869,596,908

$895,684,816

$922,555,360

$950,232,021

$978,738,982

$1,008,101,151

$1,038,344,185

$1,069,494,511

$1,101,579,346

$166,952,217

$171,960,786

$177,119,609

$182,433,195

$187,906,194

$193,543,377

$199,349,681

11