nazeer PPT

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    1/23

    NAME NAZEER MOHAMMED

    Ortho No. 20130329

    OPD NO 16797

    Date of birth 8/12/1985

    Age / Sex 28/M

    Address VASALPUR

    ,NARAINGARH,AMBALA

    Phone No. 09813583319

    PATIENT CASE HISTORY

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    2/23

    28/M,FARMER R/O VASALPUR,NARA

    INGARH/

    C/C PATIENT COMPLAINS OF

    FORWARDLY PLACED ANERIOR TEETH

    Family history

    N.R

    Medical historyN.R

    Dental history N.R

    Pretreatment 28/1/13

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    3/23

    EXTRA ORAL FACIAL VIEW

    Apprantly bilaterally

    Symmetrical

    leptoprosopic face

    Convex profile

    Potentially competent

    lips

    Interlabial gap 5 mm

    Incisor show at rest

    4mm

    acute nasolabial angle

    deep mentolabial

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    4/23

    Molar relation ;END ON ON

    RT,CLASS II

    Canine relation :END ON,CLASS

    I

    Incisor ;CLASS II

    Faciomaxillary midline

    concordant

    Maxilo-mandibular midlines are

    concordant

    Overjet 9mmOverbite 4 mm

    Intra oral examination

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    5/23

    Pretreatment 28/01/13

    Max arch:

    Arch form: U shape

    HIGH arched palate

    Mand arch:

    Arch form: U SHAPE

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    6/23

    Pretreatment OPG 24/12/12

    P t t t C h l 28/01/13

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    7/23

    Pretreatment Cephalogram 28/01/13

    Skeletal Class II jaw bases

    l

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    8/23

    SNA82

    SNB80

    ANB3.12+/-1.8

    Wits-0.01mm

    App-Bpp+5mm

    MM bisector-1.5mm

    AB Plane angle (-4.6 3.67)

    SKELETAL ANALYSIS

    Pt is skeletal Class

    Discrepancy in Sagital plane

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    9/23

    SN length(72mm) mm

    Maxillary length(ANS

    toPNS)(49mm)mm

    Mandibular length (GoTO

    PoG)(76mm)mm

    Maxillary and mand length is increased

    N perpendicular to

    A point (-4.46mm) mm

    B point (-11.03mm) mm

    Pog (-10.5mm) mm

    Both the mand and

    max are proportionally

    Enlarge.

    A and B point are

    placed normal to

    N perpendicular.

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    10/23

    FMA

    (24)

    SN-MP (32)

    Y-axis (59)

    Gonial angle (123)

    Lower gonialangle

    (70)

    J-ratio (62 %)

    UFH / LFH (45 : 55)

    Discrepancy in Vertical dimensions

    Indicating normal growth pattern

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    11/23

    LI- A-Pg ( -2mm to2mm)

    +7mm

    LI-NB (61.7mm) 6mm

    LI-NB (274.3 ) 25

    IMPA (90) 95-

    UI -A-Pg:

    6.741.3mm

    +6mm

    UI-NA:

    4.922.05mm +7mm

    UI-NA:

    24.025.82

    27

    UI-Palatal Plane (

    110) 118

    UI-SN 112

    Pretreatment 24/12/12

    Upper incisors are proclined and protruded

    Lower incisors are proclined

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    12/23

    E line (mm) Upper lip

    (-4mm)

    mm

    Lower lip(-2 mm)

    mm

    S line (mm) Upper lip

    (0 mm)

    mm

    Lower lip(0 mm)

    mm

    Soft tissue analysis

    Nasolabial angle

    Inter labial gap 0 mm

    Lip strain 2mm

    Upper and lower lip are protruded w.r.t E & S line

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    13/23

    Model Analysis

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    14/23

    Boltons Analysis

    Indicates mandibular tooth material excess

    maxillary anteriorexcess

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    15/23

    S.I. = 25.5 M.P.V. = 35 M.M.V = 46

    C.P.V = 42.5 indicating no need for expansion.C.M.V = 39.84 indicating no need for expansion.

    Ponts Analysis

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    16/23

    T.T.M=83 P.M.D=41 P.M.B.A.W=43.37

    P.M.B.A.W.% = 43.37 %indicating borderlinecase

    Ashley Howes Analysis

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    17/23

    UPPER LOWER

    a) Arch perimeter 79mm 67mm

    space availableb) Tooth material 83mm 55.5mm

    Discrepancy b/w 4 mm 11.5mm

    arch length andtooth material

    Carey Indicating

    Arch perimeter indicating

    Careys Analysis

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    18/23

    CASE SUMMARY

    A 20 yrs old female patient shows Skeletal Class I jaw bases ..

    Dentoalveolar: Malocclusion irregularly placed teeth.

    Soft tissue: convex profile,acute nasolabial angle, average

    mentolabial sulcus,potentialy competent lips, crossbitepresent.

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    19/23

    PROBLEM LIST

    Skeletal Class I jaw bases

    ANGLES CLASS II DIV I malocclusion missing lower firs canine

    class I and Class I incisor relationship.

    acute nasolabial angle

    competent lips

    DEEP mentolabial sulcus

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    20/23

    DIAGNOSIS

    SKELETAL CLASS I Normodivergent GROWTHPATTERN .

    INCRESED OVERJET

    ANGLES CLASS II DIV IMALOCCLUSION

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    21/23

    DISCREPANCY CALCULATION

    Mandibular Arch

    FMA 24

    IMPA(95)

    IMPA correction =5

    intraarch correction =4

    Maxillary Arch

    Overjet due to IMPA correction= 2mm

    Total overjet=2+2=4mm

    Space required for correction of total overjet= 4x2=8mm

    (maxillary arch)

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    22/23

    TREATMENT OBJECTIVE

    Correction of molar and incisor relationship

    Correction of crowding ,spacing.

    Correction of crossbite

    CORRECTION of overjet and overbite

  • 7/28/2019 nazeer PPT

    23/23

    TREATMENT PLAN

    FIXED MECHANOTHERAPY

    No EXTRACTION

    ANCHORAGE-GROUP C

    TYPE OF APPLIANCE-PREADJUSTED

    APPLIANCE

    MECHANICS-ROTH .022 SLOT