-
7/25/2019 Naz Presentation
1/13
CASE ANALYSIS:NAZ FOUNDATION V.GOVERNMENT OF DELHI NCT
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -I
Submitted b:
Su!"## A$#%t&
'()*)'+
SEMESTER III
-
7/25/2019 Naz Presentation
2/13
CASE SUMMARY
,UROM
A.P. Shah, C.J.
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J
COUNSELS
etiti!e/
Anand Grover,
Sr. Adv., Trideep Pais,
Shivangi Rai, Mehak Sothi
Tripti Tandon, Advs.
F!/ Re%0!det%Chetan Chawla,
Adv. or !"#, Mukta Gupta, Standing Counsel $Crl.%,
Gaurav Shar&a, Shankar Chha'ra, Advs. or G(CT o Delhi,
Ravi Shankar )u&ar, Ashutosh Du'e*, Advs. or respondent
(o.+Joint A-tion Coun-il )annur
, .P.Shar&a,
Adv. or respondent (o. /,
0.P. Singhal,
S. Divan,
Sr. Advs., 1. )handelwal,
Arvind (arain,
S. (andini,
Ma*ur Suresh,
1rinda GroverJawahar Ra2a, Advs. or respondent (o. 3
-
7/25/2019 Naz Presentation
3/13
Se1ti! 2++3 IC45hoever voluntarilyhas carnal intercourse
against the order of naturewith an* &an,wo&an or
ani&al shall 'e punisha'le with
i&prison&ent or lie, or with i&prison&ent
oeither des-ription or a ter& whi-h &a*
e6tend to 78 *ears, and shall also 'e lia'le to9ne.:
;6planation< Penetrationis su=-ient to-onstitute -arnal
inter-ourse
-
7/25/2019 Naz Presentation
4/13
Me#i" #d S1!0e W&!e4e/:Man only> Till date, no e&ale
-onvi-ted or
sa&e se6 a-ts V!5ut#/i5:Distin-t ro& -onsent? whi-h is
irrelevant
C#/#5 ite/1!u/%e< Se6ual a-ts otherthan penile@vaginal
inter-ourse "en-e o sodo&* -onstitutes ##5 ite/1!u/%e
onl*BGovernment V. Bapoji Bhatt1884 (! Mysore "# $8%& '4)
Su'seuentl* overruled to in-lude !/#5 %e6 B*hanu v.
+mperor, 7EF Sind E3+, "ohana Vasantlal v. ,tate, A#R 7+3 Gu2
EFE, -alvin rancis v./rissa, 7E $E% Cri&es FF H
And other penetrative a-ts< Rubbi" !7 0ei% bet$ee
t&i"&%B,tate of *erala v. *undum0ara
Govindan, 7+ Cri IJ 373 ,tate of Gujarat v. Bachmiya Musamiya,
73 $% Gu2IR EF+H
M#i0u5#ti! !7 0ei%3 &e5d ti"&t5 b d%BBrother ohn2ntony
V. ,tate& 7E Cri. I.J. 7FEH
-
7/25/2019 Naz Presentation
5/13
Me#i" #d S1!0e
A"#i%t t&e !/de/ !7 #tu/e
