Upload
department-of-political-affairs-african-union-commission
View
51
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Youth Initiative for Advocacy, Growth & Advancement (YIAGA), Youth Alliance on Constitution & Electoral Reforms (YACORE), Youth Hub Africa, www.blcompere.com (a social media for social good focused blog) and Know Your Constitution Initiative of the Constitutional Rights Awareness and Liberty Initiative (CRALI) led the national youth consultation in Nigeria. The country-level consultation presented an apt opportunity for young Nigerians to x-ray emerging trends of Constitutionalism and Rule of Law in Nigeria which illuminates the flagrant abuse of power by public office holders, disregard for the rule of law, abuse of human rights, absence of public accountability, social and political alienation of young people from national development efforts etc.
Citation preview
NIGERIA
REPORT OF NATIONAL YOUTH
CONSULTATION ON CONSTITUTIONALISM
AND RULE OF LAW IN NIGERIA
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Lead Organization:
YOUTH INITIATIAVE FOR ADVOCACY, GROWTH & ADVANCEMENT 35, S.O Williams Crescent, Anthony Enahoro Str, Utako
+234 8032894709, 8060763786 [email protected], [email protected]
www.yiaga.org twitter @YIAGA
Introduction
1. Context
Most countries like Nigeria practice constitutional democracy which presupposes the
existence of a supreme law that provides the framework for the governance of a country.
Additionally, the document births inter-alia individual rights capable of enforcement in the
court of law. Though Constitutionalism clearly denotes the existence of a Constitution, it
cannot be reduced wholesomely to the simple existence of a formal written Constitution. It
encompasses the legal and political acceptance of the superiority of the Constitution and
constitutional principles over all other laws. Emphatically, Constitutionalism aptly
proclaims the desirability of the rule of law as opposed to the rule by the arbitrary judgment
of a mere fiat of public officials.
Africa is undergoing different shifts in democratic consolidation, observance of the rule of
law and protection of human rights. These shifts have affected the quality of governance and
citizens’ participation in the democratic process. Emphatically, the preponderance of human
rights violations, disregard for the rule of law and constitutionalism has occasioned
agitations and advocacy for the entrenchment of democratic principles, observance of rule of
law and most importantly upholding constitutional order.
It is against this background that the Department of Political Affairs of the African Union
Commission convenes a High level dialogue annually to provide a conducive avenue for
Member States, civil society and other stakeholders including the private sector,
philanthropists, and development actors to engage and share comparable experiences and
lessons on how to improve governance, consolidate democracy and foster effective realisation
of human and peoples’ rights on the continent.
In recognition of the critical need to streamline the concerns and perspectives of young
people into the discourse on Constitutionalism and Rule of Law in Africa, the Department of
Political Affairs of the African Union Commission facilitated National Youth Consultations
across countries in Africa. Basically, the National consultations focused on interrogating
country-level trends on Constitutionalism and Rule of Law and providing youth perspective
to the emerging trends on constitutionalism.
Youth Initiative for Advocacy, Growth & Advancement (YIAGA), Youth Alliance on
Constitution & Electoral Reforms (YACORE), Youth Hub Africa, www.blcompere.com (a
social media for social good focused blog) and Know Your Constitution Initiative of the
Constitutional Rights Awareness and Liberty Initiative (CRALI) led the national youth
consultation in Nigeria.
The country-level consultation presented an apt opportunity for young Nigerians to x-ray
emerging trends of Constitutionalism and Rule of Law in Nigeria which illuminates the
flagrant abuse of power by public office holders, disregard for the rule of law, abuse of human
rights, absence of public accountability, social and political alienation of young people from
national development efforts etc.
During the online and offline consultation hosted in Nigeria, participants reached consensus
on the content and principles of constitutionalism and rule of law. They include;
I. The validity of every act of governmental authority affecting or likely to affect the
rights, duties and obligations of the citizenry must be in accordance with law;
II. Supremacy of the law is a fundamental element of rule of law. In principle, the
constitution is supreme because it describes itself as the supreme law of the land.
Adhering to the principle of constitutional supremacy is a function of our treatment
of the subject of impunity;
III. Public officials hold power in trust for citizens hence their actions must be
conducted within the bounds of defined rule and regulations that guarantee public
accountability;
IV. The non existence of marginalization, discrimination and enjoyment of undue
privileges by ‘sacred cows’. In other words, constitutionalism guarantees equality
before the law;
V. Constitutionalism and rule of law are predicated on the respect of rights and
freedoms of individuals;
VI. The Rule of Law prescribes that everything is done through a legal process by
following laid down legislations, regulations and rules for each process.
2. Objectives of Consultation
1. Assess the state of constitutionalism and rule of law in Nigeria and Africa;
2. Examine the socio-political dynamics of constitution making and reforms processes
in Nigeria and Africa;
3. Assess the emerging trends, challenges and opportunities to strengthen
constitutional order and rule of law in Nigeria and Africa;
4. Facilitate the incorporation of youth concerns and perspectives into discussions
focusing on Constitutionalism and Rule of Law in Nigeria and Africa;
5. Encourage the promotion of African Charter on Democracy, Elections and
Governance, African Youth Charter and other related AU instruments on popular
participation, human rights and governance;
6. Develop an agenda for promoting constitutionalism and the rule of law in Nigeria and
Africa.
3. Methodology of the Consultation
The National consultation was hosted on virtual and offline platforms. 30th -31st October 2013
featured the facebook consultation while the twitter consultation was conducted on 1st
November 2013. Notably, the twitter consultation recorded a total of 167,000 accounts with
the hashtag #YouthConsultation while the facebook consultation was hosted on @YIAGA fan
page with over 9,540 likes. The physical Consultation was conducted in Abuja on
Wednesday, 6th November 2013 with over 60 young Nigerians from diverse youth groups in
attendance. The participants were drawn from youth organizations across Nigeria.
Representatives of political, religious, traditional and cultural youth associations were
invited to participate in the consultation.
The National Youth Consultation on Constitutionalism and Rule of Law in Nigeria provided
a platform for young Nigerians to critically assess the trends, challenges and prospects of
Constitutionalism and Rule of Law in Nigeria. Speaking on behalf of the consultation
facilitators, Cynthia Mbamalu YIAGA’s Research & Programs Manager stated that a
prosperous society is firmly held by strong pillars of constitutionalism and rule of law
because it promotes positive trends of peace, good governance, security, fundamental rights
and social justice. She strongly opined that the youth have a major role to play in promoting
constitutionalism and rule of law and ensuring that leaders are accountable to the people.
Goodwill Messages were delivered by Mr. Rotimi Olawale (Representative of the African
Youth Panel), Comrade Jude Imagwe (Special Adviser to the President on Student and Youth
Affairs). The Keynote Address was delivered by Dr. Tunji Olaopa, Permanent Secretary,
Federal Ministry of Youth Development. In his address titled ‘What do the youths want?
Youth Charter and Constitutionalism’ he advocated for constitutional reforms that remove
exclusionary clauses restricting youth from electives offices.
The consultative Technical Plenary Sessions had a rich faculty comprising of Prof. Chidi
Odinkalu (Chairman National Human Rights Commission), Leonard Ugbajah (Legal
Practitioner), Prof. Sam Egwu (United Nations Development Programme, UNDP), Dr.
Fatima Akilu (Office of the National Security Adviser), Nana Nwachukwu (Gender
Advocate/Legal Practitioner), Eze Nwagwu (Chair, Partners for Electoral Reform), Prof.
Okechukwu Ibeanu (Chief Technical Adviser, INEC), Ifeyinwa Okadigbo (Gender
Advocate), Bukhari Jega (Youth Alliance on Constitution and Electoral Reform, YACORE).
The plenary sessions focused on issues like; “Promoting Constitutionalism and Rule of Law”,
“Human Rights and Security”, “Leadership, Governance and Accountability” and “Elections
and Youth Participation”. The consultation moved into Syndicate Groups Session. The
Syndicate Groups Session provided an opportunity for in-depth debates on current issues on
constitutionalism and rule of law in Nigeria.
4. Issues of Constitutionalism and Rule of Law identified during the consultation
4.1 Legitimacy of the Nigerian Constitution
The drafting of constitutions is a recurring decimal in Nigeria’s chequered political
history. Right from the colonial period, Nigerians were barely involved in the art of
constitution making. It is acceptable knowledge that the British colonial overlords
employed constitution making to consolidate their imperial strategies. Post colonial
Nigerian leaders have also utilized constitution drafting to ensure regime longevity.
The current 1999 constitution is a product of haste because the receding military
junta was in a hurry to leave the political turf. The Constitution has a foundational
problem as it is merely a rehashing of the 1979 Constitution. Consequently, the 1999
constitution has among other things the trappings of military centralization of power
resulting in de-federalization of Nigeria and the consequent clamour and agitation for
the amendment of the constitution.
Since the coming into force of the current constitution on May 29 1999, none of its
provisions has, so far, been amended despite citizens agitations until 2011 during the
electoral reform. The legitimacy of the constitution has always been called to
question because the people never participated in the drafting of the constitution. It
was said that the Constitution lies against itself in its preamble where it states that
‘We the people of Nigeria’ when in actual fact, the people never participated in
making that proclamation in the constitution.
A cardinal feature of democracy remains the active participation of the people in
governance. The National Assembly recently constituted a constitutional reform
committee to review the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Efforts
were made by citizens to engage the constitution review process despite the limited
space of participation provided by the National Assembly. The outcome of the voting
on the proposed amendments in the National Assembly was deemed to be at variance
with the wishes and aspirations of the people. For example the Nigerian Senate
rejected most recommendations advanced by young people e.g. local government
autonomy, independent candidacy, lowering the age criteria for contesting elections,
constitutional definition of youth, enforceability of socio-economic and political
rights etc. Whilst the lower house voted in favour of the recommendation on
independent candidacy, local government autonomy and establishment of the
Electoral Offences Commission, their Senate counterparts did not include any youth
issue on their template on constitutional amendment.
4.2 Non compliance with international agreements and domestication of
regional instruments
There is a preponderance of regional and international instruments that guarantee
democratic governance and human rights in Africa. Nigeria as a country is very quick
to sign or ratify these instruments. Regrettably, domesticating and implementing
international instruments has been very poor in Nigeria. For example, the African
Youth Charter which is a definitive statement articulating actions and statutes on the
roles and integration of African youth in mainstream development and politics is duly
ratified by Nigeria. However, its implementation leaves so much to be desired. Young
people in Nigeria still suffer different forms of political alienation and social
exclusion. The African Youth Charter clearly defines a youth as any person between
the ages of 18 – 35. The National Youth Policy also recognizes this definition but in
practice the country is yet to officially accept this classification of youth.
The non-justiciability of Chapter II of the 1999 Constitution exposes the hypocrisy
and deceit of the Nigerian government. As stated earlier Nigeria is a proud signatory
to the African Youth Charter and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights
which contains justiciable socio-economic rights. Conversely, the provisions under
Chapter II of the Nigerian Constitution which prescribes socio-economic rights are
non-justiciable. For example, the right to life and the right to health care. A person
who cannot afford healthcare would have his right to life directly breached by the
fact that he is not legally entitled to free healthcare. Furthermore, this hypocrisy
contributes to the high level of unemployment rate which is pegged at 38% and the
figure keeps rising.
4.3 Human Rights
Section 14 of the 1999 Constitution provides that the primary responsibility of
government is the protection of lives and properties of its citizens. Young people note
with great concern the high rate of human rights violations believed to have reached
an unprecedented height. Recent developments in the polity clearly reveal that the
Nigerian state does not recognise and respect fundamental rights and freedoms. The
alleged killings in Baga, Bornu state by the Nigerian Military, the government’s ban
on #Fuelling Poverty (a video documentary exposing corruption and impunity in the
fuel subsidy scheme), The killings of four students of the Nassarawa State University
during a peaceful student protest, the extrajudicial killings and continuous torture of
detainees are clear indicators of the poor state of human rights protection in Nigeria.
Young people are the potentially vulnerable group that suffer these forms of human
rights violation. The Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the U.S 2012
Human Rights Reports on Nigeria lay credence to this postulation.
Nigeria is currently faced with security challenges ranging from terrorism and
insurgency especially in the north eastern part of Nigeria. Whilst the rise in
insecurity has occasioned the violation of human rights (freedom of movement,
respect for human dignity and right to life, right to private life etc) in the some areas
it has also taken centre stage with regards to Nigeria’s prioritization of its National
security interests, leading to both improvements and developments in strategic
communication approached within the various security agencies. There are several
credibly attested allegations of gross violations by officials of the Joint Task Force
deployed to north east Nigeria to combat terrorism and insurgency. The allegations
include summary executions, torture, arbitrary detention amounting to internment
and outrages against the dignity of civilians, as well as rape. Most of the allegations
against the Joint Task Force clearly appear to raise questions of proportionality of the
use of force and standards applicable to the conduct of the armed forces in internal
security operations. This situation raises apprehension on viability of state response
in the fight against terrorism and insurgency. The Interim Assessment Report on the
Baga Incident and the situation in North-East Nigeria validates this apprehension on
the part of citizens’ most especially young people.
4.5 Electoral Process and Youth Participation
Elections are the pathway to achieving and strengthening democracy. Credible
election is considered to be the most potent ingredient for good governance in any
country and Nigeria is not an exception. Since her return to democracy, Nigeria has
organized four successive elections in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011 and none of them was
adjudged to be hitch-free and credible except the 2011 elections that witnessed
tremendous improvement in election administration in Nigeria.
Nigeria has a burgeoning youth population that provides a huge social, economic and
political capital for the development of the country. With over 60% of the country
voting population dominated by young eligible voters, it is critical to give them their
rightful place in the political space.
In an attempt to guarantee proper management of elections in Nigeria, the Nigerian
Electoral Act has been amended at different times. However, little attention is paid
to how the electoral law makes youth participation and inclusivity a priority. Despite
the immense contributions of young people to democratic development in Nigeria,
the current political class has failed to appreciate ‘youth-power’ and the dynamics
they bring to bear in electoral politics. The political process is perpetually skewed to
exclude young people from qualitative participation. This marginalization and
exclusion of youth in political participation and decision making is underscored by
trivial responsibilities apportioned to them such as posting of posters, distribution of
campaign materials, singing and dancing during campaigns and party conventions,
mobilization of thugs and crowds. These can neither be referred to as inclusion nor
participation since they do not translate into access to the structures of decision
making. The age qualification for running for office, high cost of running political
campaigns, non-recognition of the proper definition of youth and government
interference and decimation of youth organizations are key factors that militate
against increased youth political participation.
An independent election management body guarantees credible elections and
restores citizens’ confidence in the electoral process. To safeguard the electoral
process from undue interference, manipulation and political manoeuvring, it was
contended that the election management body should enjoy absolute independence
(financial and operational independence), though with some checks and balances to
avert arbitrariness. In Nigeria, the Chairman of the Commission is appointed by the
President who is the leader of a political party. This status quo raises serious concern
on the part of the citizenry. Citizen groups have been involved in robust advocacy on
the need to reinforce the independence of the electoral commission through electoral
reforms and constitutional amendments. It is believed that divesting the power to
appoint principal electoral commissioners from the President will deepen the
independence of the Commission.
Changing or amending electoral laws within six months before elections portends
great danger to the electoral process. This may usher in a regime of impetuous
amendments with the potentials of conferring advantage to some vested interest
group (s) or person (s) against national interest.
4.5 Weak democratic institutions
In June 2009, President Barack Obama while on his visit to Africa spoke passionately
on the fact that Africa does not need strong men but strong institutions that promote
democracy, abhors corruption, respect human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Nigeria is the largest Africa oil producing state with over 150million population but
institutional weakness has crippled socio-economic and political development.
Public institutions are not independent of political manipulations and governmental
controls. In addition, decisions are taken based on the whims and caprices of
individuals appointed into offices not based on institutional norms and values clearly
prescribed in statutes or policy instruments establishing such institutions. The
abysmal level of impunity and corruption in Nigeria is exacerbated by the problem of
weak institutions that are unable to enforce the law e.g anti-corruption agencies and
security agencies. These weak institutions results in the inability of citizens to hold
those in accountable.
5. Recommendations and conclusion
5.1 Constitution Reforms
Any document that purports to be the ground norm or fundamental
law of the land and ascribes to itself supremacy and subordinates ‘any
other law’ to its overarching provisions must enjoy the full
participation of the people. Therefore, for any constitution making
and/or review process to be credible it must be predicated on the
principles of inclusivity, diversity, participation, openness,
transparency and legitimacy.
The constitution making and/or review processes must take on board
the involvement of young people at all levels. The place of the youth in
the democratic process remains cardinal for the growth of the nation
especially in a country like Nigeria where the youth constitute 60% of
the nation’s population.
Constitutional enactments that remove exclusionary clauses
restricting youths from elective offices and recognizes them as viable
participants in the governance process should be promoted. For
example, constitutional provisions that stipulate age criteria for
running for elective offices should be removed. There should be a
proper classification in the Constitution in conformity with the
African Youth Charter which clearly defines a youth as any person
between the ages of 18 and 35.
5.2 Cultivating a culture of Constitutionalism and respect for the Rule of Law
Imbibing a culture of constitutionalism among the citizenry is critical
to the institutionalization of the rule of law as the basis deepening
democratic governance. There is need to strengthen the means for
increasing the respect for rule of law. When the law is respected, it
generates multiplier effects which enhance other democratic practices
that benefit the youths. This can be done through the promotion of
activities that popularize the values of constitutionalism eg freedom,
good governance, plurality, tolerance, democracy etc.
5.2 Safeguarding human rights and National security
Strengthening Human Rights Institutions: The structural and
institutional framework of human rights institutions should be built in
such a way that they provide easy access to the people and victims of
rights violations;
Engaging in advocacy and submitting legal interventions to prevent,
minimize and reverse the negative impact that arbitrary national
security laws and policies have on the Rule of Law and human rights;
Citizens should be involved in monitoring developments relating to
counter-terrorism and human rights. They should be involved in
strategically intervening against violations of rights across especially
rights associated with the right to life, torture, and the deprivation of
liberty;
Ensure that the government incorporates international human rights
standards into decision-making when shaping counter-terrorism
policies and responding to national security measures;
Government should as a policy commit itself to the principle of legality
in the conduct of the operations in internal security deployment. In
keeping with this policy, Rules of Engagement should be adopted,
published and regularly reviewed.
5.3 Credible electoral process that guarantees citizens participation
There is need for far reaching electoral reforms that guarantee the
independence (financial & operational autonomy) of the election
management body and creates an enabling environment for citizens to
exercise their franchise irrespective of age, gender, religion and tribal
affiliations.
The Justice Mohammed Uwais-led Electoral Reform Committee of
2008 identified electoral issues that need to be addressed to raise the
democratic standards in Nigeria’s electoral process. Any meaningful
electoral reform of the electoral law should be reflective of the
recommendations contained in the report.
Furthermore, Nigeria is a signatory to numerous democratic and
political rights covenants, charters, and agreements. Some of these
multi-national instruments on governance, democracy, human rights,
peace and security collectively seek to underline the country’s
credentials in subscribing to minimum universal standards that define
best practices in human management, obligations and responsibilities
by both leaders and citizens. Some of the notable agreements that have
been ratified and domesticated by Nigeria include the United Nations’
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the African Charter on
Democracy, Elections and Governance (2002 and 2007), the Economic
Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Protocol on
Democracy and Good Governance (2001) and the Supplementary
Protocol of the ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good
Governance relating to the mechanism for Conflict Prevention,
Management, Resolution, Peacekeeping and Security (2001). It is
important for Nigeria to fulfil its international obligations by
implementing these instruments in her electoral process.
Appointments into the board of the electoral commission should be
conducted through an open, democratic and transparent process
devoid of political interferences. This will encourage the participation
of the young people in the electoral process. The electoral demography
which is dominated by young people makes it imperative that they are
given adequate space within political parties to participate as
candidates and occupy party leadership positions;
There should be an increase in youth participation in regional and
continental election observation mission;
Political parties should as a policy ensure all party youth leaders are
between the ages of 18 to 35 as defined by the National Youth Policy
and African Youth Charter. Parties should also ensure youths actively
participate in decision-making process especially during party
congresses or conventions;
5.4 Advocacy and popularization of regional instruments and values of constitutionalism by youth and civil society organizations
A virile and enlightened youth population, particularly one bolstered by a
vibrant civil society and press is crucial for the promotion of the principles of
constitutionalism. Youth organizations and civil society groups can play a
significant role in popularizing regional instruments relating to
constitutionalism and rule of law. Popularization and advocacy activities
could include the deployment of new media and traditional media tools to
promote constitutionalism, internships and exchange programs on
constitutionalism and rule of law, translating constitutions in local languages,
mainstreaming civic education into education curricula of academic
institutions etc
5.4 Strengthening institutions and stakeholder capacity Consistent capacity development on the values of constitutionalism and rule
of law will deepen institutional capacity and enhance democratic governance.
It is asserted that the weak state of our institutions is occasioned by the lack
of insight on the principles of constitutionalism and rule of law. There is a
great need to strengthen the capacity of different stakeholders groups in the
democratic process on the values of constitutionalism e.g. legislators, political
parties, judges, civil society organizations.
6. Conclusion
In conclusion, constitutionalism and rule of law deepens democratic governance and
promotes socio-economic and political development. Rule of law can only be effective
in a country that promotes transparency, inclusivity, freedoms and democracy.
Citizens have a fundamental role to play in ensuring that they monitor the adherence
to the principles of constitutionalism and rule of law. Young people must rise to the
responsibility of consistently holding their leaders accountable based on the values of
constitutionalism. Securing a future devoid of constitutional disorder and flagrant
disregard for rule of law hinges on citizens’ ability to be vigilant and proactive in
undertaking strong and extensive advocacy in promoting the principles of
constitutionalism and rule of law.