NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATISTICS (NSDS): 10 Years of Experiences in Statistical Planning

1

Presentation at the Paris21 Annual Meeting 2014: Strengthening National Capacities to Bridge Development Data Gaps

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATISTICS (NSDS):

10 Years of Experiences in Statistical Planning

O. O. AJAYI

Slide 2

Background

NSDS as benchmark for statistical planning

Preparation of guide documents for the design and

implementation of the NSDS

NSDS issues – NSDS vis-à-vis SMP in the countries

Status of designs & implementation of NSDS/SMP in Africa

Funding sources for the design & implementation of NSDS

Key changes in countries that designed and implemented

NSDS/SMP & in Africa

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

Slide 3

Effects of NSDS design and implementation on key issues: Governance of the NSS (Management of the NSS)

Advocacy for statistics

Situation of funding statistics

User/Producer dialogue

Coordination

Statistical Capacity Building (SCB)

Global development of the NSS

Constraints to full adoption of the NSDS approach

Conclusion and Recommendations

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

Slide 4

Introduction:1. Strategic Planning for improved statistics is not a new phenomenon:

─ About 25 years ago, the Addis Ababa Plan of Action (AAPA) for statistical development in Africa in the 1990s was prepared by the UNECA;

─ General Data Dissemination System (GDDS) was another initiative developed by the IMF through which plans for improvement of statistics are developed;

─ Data Quality Assessment Framework (DQAF) also developed by IMF to handle data quality issues for significant improvement in statistical outputs

─ Multi-Annual Integrated Statistical Programme (MISP) Framework developed by Eurostat for transition countries of Eastern Europe

All these have taken strategic approach to statistical development but with some lapses. Learning from the experiences of these suggested the new approach adopted for the NSDS.

BACKGROUND

Slide 5

Introduction Cont.:2. The imperativeness for developing countries and transition

economies to design and implement comprehensive National Strategies for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) was accepted by the International Development Community:

Because statistics is critically essential to support policy and development framework formulation--PRSs, Sectoral plans, sub-national plans, & International Development Goals (e.g. MDGs) plus monitoring their implementation and evaluating their achievements;

Therefore Paris21 (between 2001 – 2003) through its task team examined the principles and the practical consideration of producing strategies for better statistics and thus resolved to help developing and transition countries to design and implement NSDS; and

Paris21 shifting focus on just promoting User/Producer interaction to a main thrust of NSDS development within User/Producer dialogue could be taken on.

BACKGROUND (CONT.)

Slide 6

Introduction Cont.:3. Marrakech Action Plan for Statistics (MAPS):

While all these developments were taking place, series of international meetings deliberating on the importance of good statistics in support of results-based management, namely:

A high level forum (1st Roundtable meeting) in 2002 in Washington DC that deliberated on improving measurement of key development indicators;

Another international conference in June 2003 on improving statistics for measuring development outcomes discussed findings from Paris21 study on improved support for monitoring development goals;

BACKGROUND (CONT.)

Slide 7

Introduction Cont.:3. Marrakech Action Plan for Statistics (MAPS) Cont:

2nd International round table on managing for development results (Marrakech, Feb. 2004) endorsed MAPs which among its six Actions for establishing sustainable statistical capacity and national commitment to improve statistics, and called on countries to design NSDS by 2006 with implementation to follow so as to obtain ready indicators required to evaluate MDGs by 2010;

Also in Africa, UNECA endorsed this action and went to prepare the Reference Regional Strategic Framework (RRSF) as Africa’s MAPS and was endorsed in February 2006. Of course other regions similarly embraced MAPS but not in any formal way as Africa did; and

The 3rd International Roundtable on Managing for Development Results focused on building countries’ capacity (including statistical capacity) to manage for results. Aid effectiveness which was a major concern for donors, development agencies and developing countries was the central agenda in Hanoi in February 2007.

BACKGROUND (CONT.)

Slide 8

Paris21 focused efforts on encouraging and assisting all low-income and lower middle-income countries to design, implement and monitor NSDS and to:

Þ Be nationally owned and through it produce data for the MDG indicators;

Þ Have countries develop overall vision for where the NSS will be in 5-10 years with milestones for getting there;

Þ Be part of the country development plans and poverty reduction policy;Þ Serve as a unified and comprehensive framework for continual

assessment of evolving needs of users and priorities and also for international and bilateral assistance;

Þ Build capacities needed to meet the needs of users in a more coordinated manner;

Þ Include all parts of the data production units (covering the entire NSS);Þ Follow international standards and in line with the fundamental

principles of official statistics including quality consciousness; address issues related to the analysis and use of data;

NSDS AS BENCHMARK FOR STATISTICAL PLANNING

Slide 9

Þ Serve as framework for mobilizing, harnessing and leveraging resources (both national and international) and as basis for effective and results oriented strategic management of the NSS;

Þ Build on all past and existing initiatives, activities and experiences

NSDS, indeed, is expected to provide a country with a strategy for improving development statistics across the entire NSS and has been widely accepted as a best practice which works well and should be followed by all countries;

NSDS in building capacity addresses the constraints with the system and with data products; and

NSDS design process should remain as important as the strategy document itself which includes participatory and inclusive approach along with consensus building, continuous advocacy for statistics and need for adequate investment on it (making the case for the NSDS) and use of best practices/experiences from other countries (peer learning) and consciously building an integrated and coordinated NSS.

NSDS AS BENCHMARK FOR STATISTICAL PLANNING

Slide 10

Paris21 leading other partners massively prepared many guide documents for the design and implementation of the National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS);

These documents were to be used by the countries staff, consultants and any of the stakeholders involved in the design and implementation of the NSDS;

The guide documents include Best Practices Papers, NSDS document of some countries, Brochures which could be obtained on-line, distributed at workshops, various fora and meetings. These documents which are in the knowledge base of Paris21 website were prepared over years to sharpen the principles, procedures and methods of designing NSDS. This is to keep standards of what a NSDS document should be and be found uniform over countries;

Some of the guide documents are listed on the next slide while others could be found on the Paris21 website:

http://www.paris21.org

PREPARATION OF GUIDE DOCUMENTS FOR THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NSDS

Slide 11

1. CIS-STAT GOSKOMSTAT of Russian Federation ---Seminar on Strategic Planning and Programming of Statistical Activities

Use and practice of SWOT Analysis ─ Eurostat, March 2004

2. Guidelines for Needs Assessment and Strategic Development (NASD) [strategy for the implementation of the AAPA for statistical development in Africa in the 1990s. ─ World Bank, April 2001

3. A guide to designing a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics – Paris21 (Nov. 2004).

4. A revised version of a guide to designing a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics – Paris21, 2013.

5. Making the case: National Strategy for the Development of statistics – Paris 21; Nov. 2004.

LIST OF SOME GUIDE DOCUMENTS FOR NSDS DESIGN

Slide 12

6. Measuring Up to the Measurement Problem: The role of Statistics in evidence-based policy-making (Paris21) – Christopher Scott, London School of Economics, January 2005.

7. Measuring Up to the Measurement Problem: The role of Statistics in evidence-based policy-making (Abridged Version), Paris21, March 2005

8. Guide to drafting a Roadmap for Designing the NSDS – Paris21, Feb. 2005.

9. UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (UNSC).

10. Statistics for Transparency, Accountability and Results: A five Point Action Plan – Busan Action Plan – Paris21, Oct. 2011.

LIST OF SOME GUIDE DOCUMENTS FOR NSDS DESIGN (CONT.)

Slide 13

11. Handbook on Data Quality: Assessment Methods and Tools – European Commission, 2007.

12. Developing a Policy-Based National Strategy for the Development of Statistics, - Paris21 Document Series #5, March 2007.

13. Data Quality Assessment Framework – IMF, July 2003

14. Mainstreaming Sectoral Statistical Systems in Africa: A guide to planning a coordinated NSS – AfDB, Intersect; Paris21 (Nov. 2007)

15. NSDS Approach in a Nutshell, Paris21

16. Reference Regional Strategic Framework (RRSF) for Statistical


Slide 14

17. Capacity Building in Africa; ─ ECA/AfDB/WB/Paris21 (Feb. 2006)

18. Statistical Capacity Building Indicators – Paris21 (Sept. 2002)

19. Strategy for Statistical Development: An Introductory Note – Jean Le Nay, Paris21, Oct. 2009

20. Why Statistics are crucial – Paris21

21. Why (Country name) needs good statistics – series of pamphlets developed by Paris21 for several countries (e.g. Zimbabwe, Liberia, Sudan, etc.)


Slide 15

Statistical Master Plan (SMP) in its design has detailed assessment of the National Statistical System (NSS), strategies for its further development with goals and targets at the medium term and Action Plan to put it into effect. But focusing on the National Statistics Offices (NSOs):

It violates the principles to be adhered to while designing a NSDS (entire NSS not covered, not an involving consultation; not deeply participatory; not really country owned etc.);

Challenges of sectors and sub-national entities are not directly addressed leaving the Sector Statistical Systems (SSSs) and the Sub-national Statistical Systems (SnSSs) with weak statistical capacity for the sub-systems and hence weak NSS;

SSSs and SnSSs are not mainstreamed into the NSS as it is expected for the NSDS;

Most countries started with implementing SMPs and only recently some are attempting the NSDS approach;

NSDS ISSUES – NSDS VIS-À-VIS SMP IN THE COUNTRIES

Slide 16

Uganda, Sudan and lately Burkina-Faso, Kenya, Mali, Niger are now mainstreaming sectors into the NSDS and Uganda has indeed mainstreamed sub-national statistical systems districts;

Efforts must be made to include sectoral concerns. While this process has usually taken longer, it has often resulted in a more comprehensive strategy and one which has wide support across government – the true NSDS!;

It is only a true NSDS that could be rightly mainstreamed into the National Development Plans and other Policy processes; not a SMP;

Uniform statistical development is possible only through NSDS where each sector, sub-national entity has its individual sectoral/sub-national strategies for the Development of Statistics which are building blocks for the NSDS and all the sectoral strategies, sub-national strategies implemented along with the NSDS;

There are methods specified in the mainstreaming document for dealing with the sectoral strategies with the benefits derivable from the mainstreaming

NSDS ISSUES – NSDS VIS-À-VIS SMP IN THE COUNTRIES (CONT.)

Slide 17

Mainstreaming for a Coordinated NSS To mainstream sectoral statistical systems (SSS) into the

National Statistical System (NSS) adopting best practice® Need to define what objectives to be achieved; and® What strategies to adopt to achieve them

Four key objectives have been identified, namely:® Make more efficient use of resources ( with 5 strategies)® Improve the productivity of data management (with 2 strategies)® Increase the availability of quality data (with 4 strategies)® Raise the public profile for statistics (with 1 strategy)

A total of 12 strategies Could be put and be better understood in a FRAMEWORK

FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING A COORDINATED NATIONALSTATISTICAL SYSTEM (NSS)

FRAME WORK

Slide 18

Framework for Mainstreaming Sectoral StatisticsObjectives Strategies to Mainstream Sectoral Statistical Systems into a

National Statistical System

Make more efficient use of resources

1 Common institutional procedures for coordination, collaboration and cooperation across the NSS

2 Legal and institutional framework that takes into account the requirements of all stakeholders in the NSS

3 NSS-wide financing strategy

4 Comprehensive human resources strategy with uniform training, recruitment and promotion for all staff working in the NSS

5 Rational use of physical infrastructure and ICT across the NSSImprove the productivity of data management

6 Coherent management information system across the NSS

7 Common data warehouse for the NSS

Increase the availability of quality data

8 Common metadata dictionary across the NSS9 Common standards for data quality across the NSS10 Harmonized data production schedule across the NSS11 Comprehensive dissemination policy for the NSS

Raise the public profile for statistics

12 Coherent advocacy strategies across the NSS

Slide 19

S/N COUNTRY STRATEGIES BEING DESIGNED, IMPLEMENTED SINCE LAST DECADE

REMARKS

1 Algeria Strategy being designed ─2 Angola Implemented strategy Done not under the

NSDS framework3 Benin 2005 – 2014 for CSO only SMP4 Botswana 2008 – 2012 Under preparation5 Burkina Faso 2004 – 2009; 2009 – 2012 Under preparation6 Burundi 1088 – 2011 ─7 Cameroun 2003 – 2005; 2008 – 2012 Being designed8 Cape Verde 2006 – 2010 implemented No preparation9 Comoros 2008 – 2010 For 3 years?10 Congo 2005 – 2009 Being implemented11 Cote d’Ivoire 2008 – 2010 Endorsed & being

implemented12 Djibouti 2006 – 2010

STATUS OF DEVELOPING STRATEGIES IN THE COUNTRIES IN AFRICA

Slide 20


REMARKS

13 DRC Assessment of the NSS is on going

14 Eritrea 2008 – ? Not clear

15 Ethiopia 2004 – 2008; 2008 2012 SMP type

16 Gambia 2007 – 2011 (for NSO) New one is being prepared for

17 Guinea 2008 – 2013

18 Guinea Bissau 2008 – 2013

19 Kenya 2003 – 2007 (SMP); 2008 – 2012 Implemented & being implemented

20 Lesotho 2002 – 2005 (partly implemented); 2008 - 2012

21 Liberia 2008 – 2012 Being implemented (SMP)

22 Madagascar 2007 – 2012

23 Malawi 2007 – 2011; 2012 – Implemented; under pre. or implementation

STATUS OF DEVELOPING STRATEGIES IN THE COUNTRIES IN AFRICA (CONT.)

Slide 21


REMARKS

24 Mali 2006 – 201025 Mauritania 2007 – 201226 Mauritius 2010 – 2014? Designed & being

implemented27 Mozambique 2008 – 201228 Namibia SMP designed & implemented Implemented29 Niger 2008 – 2012 Being implemented30 Nigeria 2005 – 2009 (SMP – Implemented);

2012 – 2013Being implemented

31 Rwanda 2007 – 2011 (implemented); 2014 – under preparation

32 Sao Tome & Principe

2008 – 2013 Under Implementation

33 Seychelles 2009 – 2013 prepared Under Implementation

34 Senegal 2008 – 2013 Under Implementation


Slide 22


REMARKS

35 Sierra Leone 2008 – 2012 (SMP) Somewhat implemented

36 Sudan 2003 – 2008??; 2012 – 2016 Being implemented

37 South Africa SMPs of various periods

38 South Sudan 2012 – 2016 designed SMP

39 Swaziland SMP designed (years?)

40 Tanzania 2008 – 2018? Designed; Being implemented

41 Togo 2008 – 2012

42 Tunisia A strategy being implemented

43 Uganda 2001 – 2005 (corporate plan); PNSD 2006 – 2011; next PNSD design is ongoing

Implemented

44 Zambia 2003 – 2007 (not implemented); 2014 – 2018 Being implemented

45 Zimbabwe 2007 – 2011 under implementation


Slide 23


REMARKS

46 Chad

No information of any design of strategies

47 Egypt

48 Libya

49 Morocco

50 Somalia


Slide 24

Mainstreaming for a Coordinated NSS (cont.)

Plans had taken place more in Sub-Saharan African Countries with nothing less than 90% coverage of the countries when compared with 59% of Arab States,54% of Asia and Pacific region,56% of Latin America and the Caribbean region. The coverage in Eastern Europe is not available as at writing this presentation;

Most of the strategies were of the SMP type but all the same named as a NSDS. There is need to follow the NSDS principles

Implementation has also been weak for various factors but majorly for financial reasons.

FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING A COORDINATED NATIONALSTATISTICAL SYSTEM (NSS) (CONT.)

Slide 25

Introduction Countries have recognized the need for better data to guide policies for

poverty reduction and social and economic development and were therefore eager to improve their statistical capacity to produce the required and relevant statistics.

At the beginning of having to implement the MAPs with respect to the NSDS design, an estimate of $118 million was going to be needed – a huge resource requirement;

1. Sources TFSCB: A multi-donor Trust Fund for Statistical Capacity Building (TFSCB) was designed to

improve the capacity of developing countries to produce and use statistics. World Bank’s TFSCB therefore provides grants for the preparation of NSDS;

TFSCB works closely with Paris21 to advance coordinated international efforts to improve statistics;

TFSCB is supported by contributions from UK, Canada, Netherlands, Germany, France and Switzerland and administered by the World Bank (WB);

Late 2004, TFSCB was restructured to allocate greater financial resources to support the preparation of the NSDS for low-income countries

FUNDING SOURCES FOR THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NSDS/SMP

Slide 26

2. Sources – STATCAP:ÞSTATCAP is a multi-country SCB programme and for easy access for WB

financing for statistical capacity. It is financed through IBRD or IDA as specific investments credits or loan;

ÞCriteria for qualification for the fund are:─ Designed NSDS or SMP available;─ National commitment and leadership to strengthen NSS;─ Willingness to comply with good statistical practice;─ Participation in global development and monitoring activities;─ Use of sustainable implementation arrangements.

ÞSTATCAP addresses: Statistical policy and regulatory plus institutional framework (legal framework,

mechanisms for efficient management and coordination; Developing statistical infrastructure (Business Register, Enumeration Area Sampling

frame, classifications, database structures, GIS, Compendium of standards etc.); Statistical operations & procedures; human resources development; Physical infrastructure and equipment.

FUNDING SOURCES FOR THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NSDS/SMP (CONT.)

Slide 27

3. Sources – Statistics for results Facility – Catalytic Fund (SRF – CF):◘ The SRF – CF is a product of recent global discussions on scaling up

support for statistics and in line with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness (advocating strong commitments to harmonize and align aid delivery by the donor community;

◘ The Goal is to increase developing countries capacity to formulate development policies and for evidence-based decision-making through sustained improvement in production, availability, quality and use of statistics for managing and measuring development results. The SRF – CF is to support this goal including:® Stimulate support for implementing National Statistical Plans (NSDS, SMP);® Promote a system-wide approach in statistics at country level;® Promote improved coordination and partnership between users and

statistical producers;® Deliver more efficient and effective aid and technical assistance for

strengthening statistical systems and results measurement.


Slide 28

3. Sources – Statistics for results Facility – Catalytic Fund (SRF – CF):◘ Piloting the scheme obtained money from UK and Netherlands

before extending it to more countries;

◘ Eligibility: Country must have NSDS/SMP/NSP and be willing to establish National

Partnership in Statistics; Should agree to:

─ Exercise leadership over their statistical development by preparing good quality, comprehensive, realistic, prioritized and costed National Statistical Plan;

─ Allocate resources and carry out necessary administrative reforms for proper implementation of NSP;

─ Take the lead in coordinating donor and government support through the creation of National partnership;

─ Put into effect the UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics, in particular to ensure that users have confidence in the quality and integrity of national statistics; and

─ Monitor progress in statistics and statistical capacity based on outputs and outcomes indicators.


Slide 29

4. Source – Other Development Partners:There are multilateral agencies, bilateral donors that gave support directly to the countries and these include:

─ UNDP, UNFPA, IMF, European Commission;─ Development Banks. In particular the African Development Bank

took deliberate decision to assume responsibility to support the preparation of strategies and implementation of them for all African countries;

─ Bilateral donors – DFID, NORAD, SIDA, CIDA, etc.

5.Sources – Country Governments:Some countries released funds from the National budgets. In particular South Africa financed its strategies, Lesotho gave some reasonable amount during the design of their last strategy to mention only some examples.


Slide 30

The immediate positive developments that became obvious to the African Statistical System and the Countries’ NSSs in Africa were the following: Many African countries in very large proportion revised their very archaic

Statistics Acts and new laws now govern the statistics activities of the countries; Substantial improvement took place with the infrastructures of the agencies

including physical, statistical and ICT infrastructures. Some NSOs got new office buildings, vehicles for survey implementation and ICT equipment and systems;

In particular the unavailable statistical infrastructures were developed including compendium of standards, sampling frames, Business Register, etc.;

Institutional reforms took place with many NSOs upgraded and the Chief Executives raised 1 or 2 levels above what they were and at par with the highest position in the civil services;

The agencies became semi-autonomous with opportunities for handling their own management issues;

In some cases, the conditions of service and pay were reasonably improved; Improved organizational arrangements that improved career prospects of the

staff generally;

KEY CHANGES IN COUNTRIES DUE TO DESIGNED AND IMPLEMENTED NSDS/SMP IN AFRICA

Slide 31

Coordination of the NSS and within agency coordination improved significantly; there are now coordination structures created in the agencies;

At the apex of the organization are Boards/Councils which serve as buffers between the agency and the government which enhances quickness of actions and statistical operations;

Slightly improved statistical outputs that have reasonable quality levels; andAt Regional Level:The Africa Statistical System became better coordinated and a lot of

collaboration works going on among the regional organizations – UNECA, AfDB, AUC and all sub-regional organizations and the country NSOs all working well together under institutional arrangements [Africa Statistics Coordinating Committee, Statistical Commission for Africa (StatCom-Africa), Africa Symposia for Statistical Development (ASSD)];

Better monitoring of the implementation of RRSF/NSDS/SMP within Africa; and

AfDB took on responsibility for Statistical Capacity Building in Africa, which role has significantly improved statistical outputs.

KEY CHANGES IN COUNTRIES DUE TO DESIGNED AND IMPLEMENTED NSDS/SMP IN AFRICA (CONT.)

Slide 32

The actions to design and implement NSDS/SMP brought some positive changes with respect to some key issues and these are:a) Governance of NSS(Management of the NSS); where full principles of the

NSDS were observed and even in the case of a partial strategy as in the case of the SMP, the components of the NSS have been better coordinated and therefore better managed. The structures of the NSS like the User/Producer Committee, Producer/Producer Committee are working more effectively and efficiently. The Board/Council are generally responsive to the needs of the NSS;

b) Through Advocacy programme both during the design and implementation of the NSDS, Statistics has been better advocated for. A lot of advocacy tools are available making the role of statistics better understood;

c) Investment in statistics improved slightly but a lot more are needed than is currently given for statistical development;

d) User/Producer dialogue improved right from the design stage of the NSDS in which stakeholders had to work on the design process. The User/Producer Committees are established and are meeting. Improvement will be incremental as the years roll by;

EFFECTS OF NSDS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENATION ON KEY ISSUES

Slide 33

e) Coordination of the NSS and within sub-systems has improved. During the design of the NSDS, the stakeholders worked together and that has been carried into the implementation stage. Also coordination mechanisms and structures have been established and coordination was no more in a flux. Now all data production agencies and NSO have coordination units and directorate respectively and these took on the responsibilities of within and across the NSS coordination;

f) Statistical Capacity Building (SCB):As the NSDS got designed, one of the Action Plans was the implementation of SCB programme. As implementation progressed so also would improvement in the capacities would be improving. The only thing that could limit the acceleration of the improvement would be inadequacy of fund to implement the programme;

g) Global Development of the NSS:The critical requirements of this will be the design of a proper NSDS with Sector Strategy for the Development of Statistics (SSDS) also designed. That guarantees that there would be the strengthened NSS. The development of Statistics will then be uniform across the entire NSS. Necessary to therefore have sectors mainstreamed into the NSS.

EFFECTS OF NSDS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENATION ON KEY ISSUES (CONT.)

Slide 34

There are constraints that could rob us of the full benefits of improving national statistics through the design and implementation of the NSDS. These constraints are the following:

i. The NSDS has not been mainstreamed into the National Development Frameworks and other policy processes and as such will find it difficult to have appreciable budget from the National and Sectoral Budgets. Statistics then fail to be regarded as a cross- cutting sector that ought to be funded as the other sectors leading the country to perpetual dependence on Donor fund. Only two(2) countries have mainstreamed NSDS into the National Development Plan; Nigeria and Uganda. Every effort needs be exerted to see this philosophy accepted by the country authorities;

ii. Another constraint is the non-mainstreaming of sectors into the NSS as result of choosing to have a strategy to focus on the NSO – SMP. This is against one of the principles of the NSDS design process. We can only reap non-uniform statistical capacity across the NSS. This is the situation as at now;

iii. There were delays in getting fund from some sources as a result of cumbersome procedure of accessing the fund. The culprit of this occurrence is the STATCAP source with processing taking as long as 2-3 years. This can only bring frustration in the implementation of the NSDS with the consequence of dampened enthusiasm.

CONSTRAINTS TO FULL ADOPTION OF THE NSDS APPROACH TO STATISTICAL PLANNING

Slide 35

iv. Government support for statistical development is still very little and government leadership still must be made to appreciate the role of statistics in achieving progress for the country;

v. There are many consultants working in Africa who design SMP instead of the NSDS because the demand for going through NSDS design process is too tedious and takes time and they were usually in a hurry to finish writing the document. This slows down the pace of statistical development in a country. The mainstreaming of sectors into the NSDS is a necessity and the consultants must be re-orientated and better trained to follow all the principles for the design of the NSDS. The guide manual on mainstreaming is not being used to guide the process which had been one reason why consultants have not mainstreamed sectors into the NSDS;

vi. Lack of effective and realistic programme of reforms and of investments that are supported by government and partners;

vii. Lack of effective implementation plans and absence of effective engagement with donors;

viii. The problem of managing reform and reorganization at the same time as maintaining and improving statistical outputs;

ix. Load on statistical agencies in dealing with different donors’ reporting and management procedures.

CONSTRAINTS TO FULL ADOPTION OF THE NSDS APPROACH TO STATISTICAL PLANNING (CONT.)

Slide 36

Conclusion:A well designed and implemented NSDS certainly will move a country to a data-rich nation which gives better results management. Also NSDS depends on the preparation process which includes:

Design process;Involvement of policy makers;Level and breadth of consultations;Early engagement with donors;Use of and building of local expertise;Integration of the NSDS into NDP;Coverage of the entire NSS;Sequenced and prioritized reform programme; andMonitoring a results framework for the NSDS.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Slide 37

Recommendations:Critical recommendations include: Ensuring the mainstreaming of the NSDS into the National

Development Plan as this leads to considering statistics as a development sector that will receive funding like other sectors;

Statistical development should cover the entire NSS if there would be uniform upgrading of statistical capacity and this implies that Sector Strategies for the Development of Statistics (SSDSs) are mainstreamed into the NSDS;

Use of all guide documents should be encouraged and indeed formal training should be arranged for prospective consultants on the design process of the NSDS;

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Slide 38

Recommendations (cont.): Investment in statistics should be increased starting with

enhanced resource inputs from the national and sectoral budgets. Strategies must be developed to create national statistics fund that will be well managed. A successful example of education fund created in some countries is an indication that an establishment of a National Statistics Fund will succeed;

Other sources of funding statistics, namely TFSCB, STATCAP and SRF – CF should be restructured to ensure easy access and quick release of fund for the implementation of the NSDS;

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT.)

Slide 39

Recommendations (cont.): Increased advocacy for the importance of statistics at the

highest political level internationally could change the way the national political leadership thinks of the role of statistics in the development of country. Policy and political leadership must invest more in statistics and should use statistics for all critical decision-making. If the UN could hold a general assembly to discuss on international development goals, similar conference could be held on statistics since statistics and development are so inter-related. The recent endorsement of the UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics is a good thing to happen to statistics and an indication that a general assembly on statistical development is a high possibility. Paris21 is enjoined to start the process for this.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT.)

Slide

Thank you for

Your attention

40

Documents

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATISTICS (NSDS): 10 Years of Experiences in Statistical Planning