Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
National Portfolio Organisations and Major Partner Museums Key data from the 2014/15 annual submission
March 2016
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge2
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 4
1.1 About the annual submission 4
1.2 Report layout 6
2 OVERVIEW OF THE PORTFOLIO 7
2.1 Organisations by region 7
2.2 Organisations by artform 8
3 DATA OVERVIEW 10
3.1 Regional overview 10
3.2 Artform overview 11
4 STAFF AND DIVERSITY 12
4.1 Staff total numbers 12
4.2 Ethnic diversity of staff 12
4.3 Disability breakdown 15
4.4 Gender breakdown 17
4.5 Black and minority ethnic-led organisations and Black and minority ethnic-
focused programmes of work
18
4.6 Disability-led organisations and disability-focused programmes of work 19
5 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 21
5.1 Income 21
5.2 Expenditure 26
6 ACTIVITIES AND AUDIENCES 31
6.1 Headline results: total arts activities and audiences 31
6.2 New work commissioned 35
6.3 Performances, productions and presentations 37
6.4 Exhibitions and film screenings 44
6.5 Publications 46
6.6 Education, learning and participation 48
7 ANALYSIS OF INCOME BY ATTENDANCE 50
7.1 Subsidy per attendance 50
7.2 Earned income per attendance 53
8 TOURING DATA 55
8.1 Regional and artform distribution of touring organisations 55
8.2
Reach of touring activities 57
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge3
9
MAJOR PARTNER MUSEUMS
60
9.1 Income and expenditure 60
9.2 Audiences and visitors 61
9.3 Subsidy 64
APPENDIX 1: GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS 66
APPENDIX 2: LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES 71
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge4
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 About the annual submission
Each year, arts organisations and museums that receive annual funding from Arts Council
England as part of the national portfolio are invited to provide information on organisation profile,
financial statements, number of performances, exhibitions, film screenings and educational
activities, known and estimated attendance figures for these activities and touring activity (where
relevant). This is known as an annual submission.
An online submission form was made available to all National Portfolio Organisations (NPOs) and
Major Partner Museums (MPMs) from May 2015 to June 2015. Guidance notes were provided and
the Arts Council provided further support while organisations were completing their submission.
In total, 703 NPOs and MPMs were asked to complete the annual submission and 699 (683 NPOs
and 16 MPMs) responses were analysed.
1.1.1 Why the Arts Council collects data from its National Portfolio Organisations and
Major Partner Museums
The annual submission shows how Arts Council England’s NPO and MPM funding is used. The
evidence is used in:
Reporting to government and key stakeholders
Informing our monitoring of the whole national portfolio, as this is a major strand of
our funding
Informing our policies, aims and ambitions
1.1.2 What the Arts Council does with the data
The annual submission is used to monitor:
Arts Council England’s stated objectives and government targets
NPO/MPM activity compared with their funding agreements
1.1.3 Official statistics
On 1 April 2009 Arts Council England became a provider of official statistics under the extended
scope of the Statistics and Registration Act of 2008. This means that when we produce, manage
and disseminate official statistics we strive to abide by the Code of Practice for Official Statistics
published by the UK Statistics Authority in January 2009.
In accordance with the code, since 1 April 2009 the aggregate data collected by Arts Council
England during the 2014/15 submission process has only been seen by researchers and analysts
for production, publication and quality assurance purposes. Relationship Managers have used
individual annual submissions for annual review monitoring with individual organisations.
On 8 October 2015, Arts Council England released headline tables detailing the work of NPOs and
MPMs from the 2014/15 annual submission. The headline tables were released as official
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge5
statistics according to the arrangements approved by the UK Statistics Authority. They are
contained in a single Excel spreadsheet with filters to select regional and artform breakdowns of
the data and can also be filtered by organisation size. The spreadsheet can be downloaded from
the Arts Council England website: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/research-and-
data/npo-and-mpm-annual-submissions/current-annual-submission/
More information on the Arts Council’s official statistics, including a publication timetable, is
available on the Arts Council England website: www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/research-and-
data/arts-council-official-statistics/. The publication timetable provides a list of individuals who
have had access to aggregate data before its release as official statistics. For more information on
the Code of Practice for Official Statistics see www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk
1.1.4 NPO/MPM data
The annual submission asks organisations to submit financial data based on Arts Council
England’s financial year, which ran from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. National Portfolio data
was taken from Arts Council England’s own records rather than the data submitted by the
organisations, in order to ensure consistent assumptions were being used. Total Arts Council
subsidy and total income were recalculated accordingly.
1.1.5 Data verification
We check organisation’s data to ensure that it is as accurate as possible. The verification process
involves cross-checking an organisation’s responses in related fields and comparing it with data
from last year’s submission in order to identify any large or unexpected year-on-year changes.
Estimated attendance is the section of the submission with the greatest potential for error.
Organisations employ different methods in assessing and reporting their estimated attendances
and their methods can change on a year-by-year basis. It is particularly difficult to estimate
attendances at non-ticketed events such as carnivals. This report includes data provided by a
number of carnival organisations which make a substantial contribution to total estimated
audiences. Subsidy per attendance is calculated using actual and estimated attendances
combined.
1.1.6 Excluded records
Occasionally it has been necessary to exclude extreme responses in order to ensure that the trend
displayed in the tables is an accurate reflection of the portfolio. Sometimes these were responses
to particular questions that were considered unlikely to be accurate. In other cases, they were
responses that were verified as correct by analysis but were considered extreme enough to
obscure the trends for the portfolio as a whole. In the report these excluded figures will be referred
to as ‘outliers’.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge6
1.1.7 Constant sample
Where possible, analysis has been undertaken comparing NPOs responding to the annual
submissions in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15. There are 678 organisations in the constant
sample for this three-year span. For MPMs, the constant sample is 16. The 2014-15 annual
submission completes the 3-year funding round of 2012-15.
1.2 Report layout
This report gives an overview of the NPOs in section 2, and an overview of the key data in section
3. The analysis then follows the sequence of questions in the annual submission for 2014/15 for
sections 4 (staff and diversity), 5 (financial statements) and 6 (activities and audiences). Income
per attendance data is presented in section 7, and touring activities are analysed in section 8.
Section 9 contains an analysis of Major Partner Museums.
1.2.1 About the charts
In charts that show the results as percentages, the percentages have been rounded to the nearest
1 per cent, therefore percentage breakdowns may not always total 100 per cent.
For 2014/15 we have included National organisations, so that data can be presented in the tables
consistently. These organisations are defined as having a significant national reach beyond the
region of their home base. The group consists of Birmingham Royal Ballet, English National Ballet,
English National Opera, Northern Ballet, Opera North, Royal National Theatre, Royal Opera
House, Royal Shakespeare Company, Southbank Centre and Welsh National Opera.
It was necessary to use short forms of region and artform categories for some of the graphs in the
report. The following tables give details of the abbreviations used.
Table 1: Regional abbreviations list Table 2: Artform abbreviations list
Abbreviation Full Name Abbreviation Full Name
E East CA Combined Arts
EM East Midlands DA Dance
L London LI Literature
NE North East MU Music
NW North West NA Not artform specific
SE South East TH Theatre
SW South West VA Visual Arts
WM West Midlands
Y Yorkshire
NAT National
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge7
2 OVERVIEW OF THE PORTFOLIO
2.1 Organisation by region
In this year’s analysis there were 683 NPOs. These are classified under nine different regions
throughout England. ‘Region’ refers to the area covered by Arts Council England and its regional
offices. An organisation’s region is determined according to the postcode of its ‘home base’, which
refers to the premises owned by a particular organisation of where the organisation holds a long-
term lease.
The regions are shown in the map in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Regional map of England
Table 3 shows the breakdown of NPOs that responded to the annual submission, by region, and
the breakdown of the regular funding by region. London, with 244 organisations, has the highest
number of NPOs, making up 36% of the total portfolio. The North West (83), South West (78) and
Yorkshire (76) follow. The East region has the fewest organisations (30) representing 4 per cent of
the annual submission responses.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge8
Table 3: Breakdown of NPOs by region 2014/15 (N=683)
2.2 Organisations by artform
National Portfolio Organisations are classified under one of seven different artform categories, as
shown in Table 2. The artform assigned to a particular organisation relates to the principal area of
work that the Arts Council England’s funding supports.
For example, if Arts Council England funds an organisation that engages in dance, music and
theatre, it will be classified under the artform towards which the Arts Council’s funding is primarily
directed. If Arts Council funding is distributed to more than one artform in a particular organisation
then this organisation’s artform will be classified as combined arts. Combined arts also include
organisations and practices that do not fit within one arts genre and includes organisations serving
particular cultural or geographical communities. Combined arts are multidisciplinary and include
arts centres, rural touring, carnival arts, festivals and participatory organisations. ‘Not artform
specific’ describes those organisations that cannot be specifically categorised into the other six
artforms.
Table 4 shows the breakdown of NPOs and the breakdown of regular funding by artform. The
most highly represented artform in the sample is theatre, which makes up 26% of the portfolio with
180 organisations. Combined arts (150) and visual arts (141) follow. Not artform specific
organisations have the lowest representation in the sample with 18 organisations (3 per cent)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge9
Table 4: Breakdown of NPOs by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge10
3 DATA OVERVIEW
This section presents an ‘at a glance’ overview of three key statistics from the 2014/15 annual
submission compared by region and by artform. The statistics compared in this section are the
total Arts Council England subsidy, the total number of activities taking place in England (which
includes performances, exhibition days and film screenings) and the total audience for these
activities. Each of these statistics is then discussed in more detail in the subsequent sections of
this report, along with other data from the annual submission.
3.1 Regional overview
An organisation’s region is determined by the postcode of its home location or host venue [1]. For
each of the key statistics, Figure 2 presents a percentage breakdown of the total number for the
portfolio as a whole that is ascribed to each region in order to provide a direct comparison.
Figure 2 shows that London accounts for the highest proportion of the total for each statistic, apart
from Arts Council subsidy, which was highest for national organisations at 38 per cent. London
received 24 per cent of the total Arts Council England subsidy. In terms of activities and
audiences, organisations based in London put on 35 per cent of the total number of activities and
reached 41 per cent of the total audiences for these activities. The East Midlands received the
lowest proportion of Arts Council subsidy with 3 per cent. The East had the lowest proportion of
audiences and activities with 2 per cent and 3 per cent respectively.
Figure 2: Key statistics comparison by region 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge11
3.2 Artform overview
As in the regional overview, Figure 3 presents a percentage breakdown of the total for each
statistic separated by artform [2]. Theatre organisations receive the highest proportion of Arts
Council subsidy at 30 per cent of the total. Visual arts organisations put on the highest proportion
of the portfolio’s total performances, exhibition days and film screenings, with 35 per cent of the
total.
The highest proportion of attendances at performances, exhibitions and film screenings was seen
at combined arts organisations, representing 46 per cent of the total across the portfolio. The
lowest proportion of activities is seen in not artform specific organisations with 2 per cent. The
lowest proportion of total attendance is in literature and dance organisations with 2 per cent each,
and the lowest proportion of Arts Council subsidy is seen in not artform specific and literature
organisations, again with 2 per cent each.
Figure 3: Key statistics comparison by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
Section 3 Notes:
[1] See section 2 for details of regional classifications [2] See section 2 for details of artform classifications
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge12
4 STAFF AND DIVERSITY
4.1 Staff total numbers
Annual submission respondents employed a total of 113,225 staff in 2014/15. 18,002 were
permanent staff and 56,223 were contractual. This is in addition to 39,000 volunteers who gave
their time to support the work of National Portfolio Organisations. This represents a 12 per cent
decrease in permanent staff, no change in contractual staff, and a 4 per cent decrease in
volunteers from 2013/14 figures [3], as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Comparison of staff numbers between 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant
sample (N=678)
Of the permanent staff employed in 2014/15, 58 per cent (10,394) worked full time.
4.2 Ethnic diversity of staff
In the 2014/15 annual submission, 65 per cent of total staff were classified as White, while 14 per
cent of total staff were from Black and minority ethnic groups [4].
Figure 5 shows the breakdown of the ethnic diversity of staff. 9 per cent of permanent staff were
from Black and minority ethnic groups, compared to 15 per cent of contractual staff.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge13
Figure 5: Ethnic diversity of staff in National Portfolio Organisations 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 6 shows the proportion of permanent/contractual staff by ethnicity. The lowest proportion of
permanent staff is found in the ethnicity unknown classification, which also contains the highest
proportion of contractual staff. 31 per cent of staff classified as White are permanent, followed by
23 per cent of Chinese staff and 20 per cent of Mixed Heritage staff.
Figure 6: Proportion of permanent/contractual staff by ethnicity group 2014/15 (N=683)
Table 5 shows the percentage change in ethnic diversity of staff among the organisations that
completed the annual submission in the three consecutive years 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15.
Since 2013/14 staff numbers showed a less than 1 per cent increase for White staff and Black and
minority ethnic staff. Overall, since 2012/13 there has been a decrease of 3 per cent for White staff
and a 5 per cent increase for Black and minority ethnic staff.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge14
Table 5: Percentage change of ethnic diversity of staff 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678) [5]
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
% change 2012/13 - 2014/15
% change 2013/14 - 2014/15
Permanent and contractual white staff
49,660 48,128 48,210 -3% 0.2%
Permanent and contractual black and minority ethnic staff
9,630 10,136 10,146 5% 0.1%
Figure 7 shows that of the constant sample, in 2012/13, Black and minority ethnic staff
represented 16 per cent of the total staff. In 2013/14 and 2014/15 the comparable percentage was
17 per cent.
Figure 7: Breakdown of staff by ethnicity in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/14 constant sample
(N=678)
Figure 8 shows the breakdown of ethnic diversity of staff by position held. Artistic staff has the
largest representation of Black and minority ethnic staff, with 16 per cent. Other staff and
Managers have the smallest, with 10 per cent from Black and minority ethnic groups.
Figure 8: Breakdown of ethnic diversity of staff by position 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge15
Figure 9 shoes the proportion of Black and minority ethnic groups by positions held within the
organisation in each of the last 3 years. This proportion has increased for staff in all positions.
Figure 9: Proportion of Black and minority ethnic groups by position held in 2012/13,
2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
4.3 Disability breakdown
In 2014/15, 2 per cent of total staff in all NPOs that completed the annual submission was reported
as having a disability. 1 per cent of permanent staff and 2 per cent of contractual or freelance staff
had a disability, as shown in Figure 10.
Figure 10: Permanent and contractual staff with and without disability 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge16
Table 6 shows the number of staff with a disability in the constant sample of organisations
responding to the annual survey in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15. Between 2013/14 and 2014/15
there was a 16 per cent increase in the number of staff with a disability, and since 2012/13 there
has been a 15 per cent increase. However, due to a decrease in the total number of staff, the
overall proportion of staff with a disability has remained stable at 2 per cent in total.
Table 6: Staff with and without a disability 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample
(N=678)
Figure 11 shows how the proportion of staff with a disability differs by their position within the
organisation. The highest proportion of staff with a disability is amongst board members, and all
managerial and above (3 per cent), and the lowest amongst artistic staff (2 per cent).
Figure 11: Disability status of staff by position 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 12 shows the proportion of staff with a disability by position held within the organisation in
each of the last 3 years. The proportion has remained stable for all positions during this period.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge17
Figure 12: Proportion of staff with a disability by position held in 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
4.4 Gender breakdown
Figure 13 shows the gender breakdown of permanent and contractual staff in 2014/15. More
permanent staff were female (59 per cent) and more contractual staff were male (52 per cent).
Figure 13: Gender balance for permanent and contractual staff 2014/15 (N=683)
There were more men than women on boards (55 per cent) but more women were managers (60
per cent), and an equal proportion held management positions or above. This category includes
managers and board members. Figure 14 shows the gender breakdown of staff by position.
Figure 14: Gender breakdown by staff position 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge18
Figure 15 shows the gender proportion by staff position in the constant sample of organisations
responding to the annual submission in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15. There has been no
significant change in any of the positions.
Figure 15: Gender proportion by staff position 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant
sample (N=678)
4.5 Black and minority ethnic-led organisations and Black and minority ethnic-focused
programmes of work
Arts Council England defines an NPO as Black and minority ethnic-led where that organisation
self-defines as such, and where more than 50 per cent of the organisations board and senior
management are from Black or minority ethnic-led backgrounds. In the 2014/15 submission, 42
NPOs defined as Black and minority ethnic-led, representing 6 per cent of the portfolio. Of the
Black and minority ethnic-led organisations, 8 per cent were based in London.
Organisations were asked to estimate the percentage of their programme that is Black and
minority ethnic-focused. For 76 NPOs (11 per cent), Black and minority ethnic-focused work
represented more than 50 per cent of their programme, described as a Black and minority ethnic-
focused programme.
Figure 16 shows that the ratio of Black and minority ethnic-led organisations and organisations
with more than 50 per cent of Black and minority ethnic-focused programmes in each region. The
West Midlands has the highest ratio, with 9 per cent being Black and minority ethnic-led. London
has the highest percentage of organisations having a Black and minority ethnic-focused
programme, with 17 per cent.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge19
Figure 16: Black and minority ethnic-led and Black and minority ethnic-focused
organisations by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 17 shows Black and minority ethnic-led organisations with more than 50 per cent Black and
minority ethnic-focused programmes, broken down by artform. Combined arts organisations had
the highest percentage of Black and minority ethnic-led organisations, with 11 per cent. Music
organisations have the highest percentage of organisations with more than 50 per cent of their
programme being Black and minority-ethnic focused, with 20 per cent.
Figure 17: Black and minority ethnic-led and Black and minority ethnic-focused
organisations by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
4.6 Disability-led organisations and disability-focused programmes of work
Arts Council England defines an NPO as disability-led where that organisation defines as such
and where more than 50 per cent of the organisation’s board and senior management have a
disability. In the 2014/15 annual submission, 5 NPOs were defined as disability-led, accounting for
1 per cent of the portfolio.
Organisations are also asked to estimate the percentage of their work that is disability-focused.
For 38 NPOs, disability-focused programmes occupied more than 50 per cent of their programme.
This represents 6 per cent of the portfolio.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge20
Figure 18 shows the percentage of organisations in each region that are disability-led as well as
organisations where disability-focused work represents more than half of their work. The West
Midlands has the highest proportion of disability-led organisations, with 2 per cent. The highest
percentage of organisations with more than 50 per cent of disability-focused programmes is based
in the South East with 9 per cent.
Figure 18: Disability-led and disability-focused organisations by region 2014/15
(N=683)
Figure 19 shows the percentage of organisations in each artform that are disability-led as well as
organisations where disability-focused programmes represent more than half of their work.
Literature organisations had the highest proportion of disability-led (4 per cent) and not artform
specific organisations had the highest percentage of disability-focused programmes (17 per cent)
Figure 19: Disability-led and disability-focused organisations by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
Section 4 Notes:
[3] Based on the constant sample for 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 of 678 organisations that responded to the
survey each year
[4] The remaining 21 per cent of staff have recorded ethnicity as ‘unknown/prefer not to say’
[5] Staff with unknown ethnicity are not included in this data
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge21
5 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Arts Council England collected financial information from the National Portfolio Organisations
(NPOs) for the 2014/15 financial year, 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2015. All data presented in this
section comes from each organisations actual or provisional accounts for 2014/15. NPOs were
required to report financial information for this period, irrespective of their own financial year.
Estimates were accepted where precise financial data was not yet available.
Data relating to Arts Council funding was taken from Arts Council England’s own records rather
than the data being submitted by the organisations, in order to ensure consistent assumptions
were being made. Total Arts Council subsidy and total income were recalculated accordingly.
5.1 Income
The largest source of revenue for the NPOs was from Earned income. This includes revenue from
core activity, which includes ticket sales, workshop fees, merchandising and membership fees.
Earned income also includes sales generated from educational activity as well as from
supplementary activity, such as funds generated from catering, bank interest and any other earned
income.
Earned income represented 53 per cent of total income for the 2014/15 portfolio. Arts council
subsidy represented 27 per cent and funding from local authorities represents 5 per cent of the
total, and other public subsidy 3 per cent. Contributed income, which includes sponsorship, trusts
and donations, made up the remaining 12 per cent of the portfolio’s total income.
5.1.1 Breakdown of total income by artform and region
Figure 20 shows the breakdown of total income by region. Earned income makes up the largest
proportion of total income for all regions, except the East at 36 per cent. The highest is the South
East at 64 per cent.
The largest proportion of Arts Council subsidy can be seen in the East at 40 per cent, and the
least reliance on Arts Council subsidy is seen in the South East at 18 per cent. London received
the highest amount of contributed income at 16 per cent, and the East Midlands saw the lowest
contributed income at 6 per cent.
The highest proportion of local authority income was seen in the West Midlands (13 per cent) and
the lowest in the East and South East (5 per cent.)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge22
Figure 20: Breakdown of total income by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 21 shows the breakdown of total income by artform. Compared to the overall portfolio. Not
artform specific organisations relied most heavily on Arts Council subsidy, with 58 per cent of
income. Music and theatre organisations were least reliant on Arts Council subsidy, at 24 per cent
of their income each.
Literature organisations secured the highest proportion of contributed income, at 17 per cent and
dance organisations received the least, with 7 per cent of their total income being contributed.
Theatre organisations acquired most of their revenue from earned income, making up 62 per cent
of their total income. In contrast, not artform specific organisations received the least earned
income, at 13 per cent.
The proportion of income from local authorities is highest in music and visual arts organisations (9
per cent each) and lowest in literature and not artform specific organisations, at 1 per cent each.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge23
Figure 21: Breakdown of total income by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
5.1.2 Income changes since 2012/13
Table 7 shows that of the 678 organisations that completed the annual submission in 2012/13,
2013/14 and 2014/15, total income has increased by 3 per cent since 2012/13. The biggest
increase was seen in contributed income with 8 per cent. The biggest decrease has been in local
authority subsidy, which has decreased by 13 per cent since 2012/13.
Arts Council subsidy increased by 1 per cent between 2012/13 and 2014/15, while earned income
increased by 5 per cent during the same period.
Table 7: Percentage change in breakdown of total income 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678)
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 % change 2012/13 - 2013/14
% change 2013/14 - 2014/15
% change 2012/13 - 2014/15
Earned income £681.6m £720.m £717.m 5.6% -0.4% 5.2% Arts Council subsidy £376.7m £384.1m £379.8m 2.0% -1.1% 0.8% Contributed income £157.2m £167.5m £170.4m 6.5% 1.7% 8.4% Local authority subsidy £83.8m £79.5m £73.1m -5.1% -8.1% -12.8% Other public subsidy £38.8m £34.3m £36.1m -11.7% 5.3% -7.1%
Total £1338.1m £1385.4m £1376.4m 3.5% -0.6% 2.9%
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge24
5.1.3 Arts Council subsidy
Table 8 shows the breakdown of Arts Council subsidy by region. London received the largest
share of Arts Council funding, with 47 per cent (this is reduced to 24 per cent when national
organisations are not included). The East Midlands received the lowest amount of Arts Council
funding (3 per cent)
Table 8: Breakdown of Arts Council subsidy by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Table 9 shows the breakdown of Arts Council subsidy by artform. Theatre organisations had the
highest share of Arts Council subsidy, with 29 per cent. Literature organisations had the lowest
amount with 2 per cent.
Table 9: Breakdown of Arts Council subsidy by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
5.1.4 Contributed income
Table 10 shows the breakdown of contributed income by region. National organisations received
the highest share of contributed income, with 35 per cent, followed by London at 34 per cent.
Organisations in the East Midlands had the lowest share of contributed income, with 2 per cent.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge25
Table 10: Breakdown of contributed income by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Table 11 shows the breakdown of contributed income by artform. Theatre had the highest share of
contributed income, with 28 per cent. Not artform specific organisations had the lowest amount
with 1 per cent.
Table 11: Breakdown of contributed income by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
As shown in Table 7, 2014/15 saw an 8 per cent increase in contributed income from 2012/13.
Figure 22 looks in more detail at the different types of contributed income among the portfolio in
the constant sample for 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15.
Contributed income from sponsorships has increased since 2013/14 by 13 per cent, but overall
has decreased by 2% in the three year period. Income from trusts has decreased by 7% in
2014/15 from 2013/14 levels but has remained stable from 2012/13. Donations have increased by
4 per cent from 2013/14 and 20 per cent overall in the three years of the constant sample.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge26
Figure 22: Breakdown of contributed income in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant
sample (N=678)
5.2 Expenditure
Total expenditure is broken down into seven categories of costs:
Artistic programmes
This means any spending related to an organisation’s main programme of
activity, whether or not that activity involves the direct production or creation
of artistic product. Costs for artistic product include production costs and
exhibition and venue hire.
Marketing
This includes both production-specific marketing and generic marketing.
Education programmes
This expenditure deals with any costs relating to an organisation’s education
programme.
Overheads
Costs of generating funds
This includes costs that are associated with generating incoming resources
from all sources other than from undertaking charitable activities. Primarily,
this is costs of fundraising and generating voluntary income, but also of
managing investments.
Governance
Governance costs include items such as internal and external audit, legal
advice and costs associated with constitutional and statutory requirements.
Other costs
This expenditure includes all costs not included in the other categories,
including irrecoverable VAT.
Most of the total expenditure (61 per cent) was directed at artistic programme costs. Overheads
represented the second largest expenditure at 16 per cent of all spending.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge27
5.2.1 Breakdown of total expenditure by region and artform
Table 12 shows the breakdown of total expenditure by region for the 2014/15 annual submissions.
Organisations based in London had the largest expenditure of all the regions, representing 51 per
cent (27 per cent when national organisations are not included). Organisations based in the East
had the lowest levels of expenditure with 3 per cent of the total expenditure in the year.
Table 12: Breakdown of total expenditure by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Table 13 shows the breakdown of total expenditure by artform for the 2014/15 annual submission.
Theatre organisations accounted for the largest share of all the artforms, with 32 per cent. Not
artform specific and literature organisations had the lowest expenditure, with 2 per cent of the total
expenditure of the portfolio.
Table 13: Breakdown of total expenditure by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 23 presents a breakdown of total expenditure by region. In all regions, spending on artistic
programming constituted the majority of expenditure in 2014/15. The second largest proportion of
expenditure was on overheads. National organisations expenditure on artistic programming was
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge28
the highest at 72 per cent, followed by the East Midlands at 61 per cent. The lowest was seen in
the North East, at 44 per cent. North East organisations spent the most on their education
programme, at 13 per cent. The South East and national organisations spent the least on
educations, at 3 per cent.
Figure 23: Breakdown of total expenditure categories by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 24 shows that music organisations had the highest proportion of expenditure on artistic
programming, with 68 per cent. Visual arts organisations spent the lowest proportion on artistic
programming, with 46 per cent. Literature organisations spent the highest proportion on their
education programme, with 13 per cent, and the lowest proportion of educational expenditure was
seen in combined arts organisations with 4 per cent.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge29
Figure 24: Breakdown of total expenditure categories by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
5.2.2 Changes in expenditure since 2012/13
Table 14 presents the percentage change in breakdown of expenditure for the 678 organisations
that completed the annual submission in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15. Since 2012/13,
expenditure on artistic programme, education programme, overheads, and generating funds has
increased, while spend on marketing, governance and other costs has decreased.
Table 14: Percentage change in breakdown of total expenditure 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 % change 2012/13 - 2013/14
% change
2013/14 - 2014/15
% change 2012/13 - 2014/15
Artistic Programme £782.4m £821.9m £837.9m 5.1% 1.9% 7.1%
Marketing £82.9m £79.6m £81.4m -4.0% 2.3% -1.8%
Education Programme £73.6m £75.7m £74.5m 2.8% -1.6% 1.1%
Overheads £210.5m £211.m £212.8m 0.3% 0.8% 1.1%
Generating Funds £78.6m £97.9m £97.7m 24.6% -0.3% 24.3%
Governance £13.m £12.4m £12.8m -4.7% 2.9% -1.9%
Other Costs £77.1m £60.1m £52.6m -22.1% -12.4% -31.8%
Total £1318.1m £1358.7m £1369.6m 3.1% 0.8% 3.9%
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge30
Figure 25 shows that the proportion of spending for each of the expenditure categories have
remained relatively stable over the last three years.
Figure 25: Breakdown of expenditure by type for 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant
sample (N=678)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge31
6 ACTIVITIES AND AUDIENCES
This section presents data about the activities and audiences in 2014/15. For activities that directly
present artistic content to their audience such as performances, exhibition days, film screenings
and education activities, the numbers are broken down by region and by artform classification.
When activities by the NPOs cannot be measured in terms of numbers of activities and audience
data, such as publications, these are presented as numbers available and numbers
sold/distributed, broken down by artform.
The attendance figures have, in most cases, been presented as known attendance (an actual
audience count measured by a precise method such as the sale of tickets) and estimated
attendance (applies to non-ticketed events such as festivals, carnivals etc) minus any attendance
to events outside England.
6.1 Headline results: total arts activities and audiences
This section looks at the total number of arts activities across the portfolio. NPOs responding to
the annual submission in 2014/15 put on 337,572 performances, exhibition days and film
screening days. Of these, 302,051 took place in England.
These arts activities included 54,554 schools performances, and performances for Children and
Young People (CYP), which were presented to 4-19 year olds in fill time education.
NPOs responding to the annual submission in 2014/15 generated 119,021,764 (known plus
estimated) attendances to performances, exhibition days and film screening days held in England
over the year (including schools and CYP performances). This is the headline attendance figure
for the portfolio’s arts activities. Other activities, such as education work, may generate additional
attendances.
6.1.1 Total activities and audiences by region
Figure 26 shows the breakdown of performances, exhibitions and film screening days per region,
alongside the attendance figure for these activities. Organisations based in London put on 33 per
cent of the total performances, exhibition days and film screening days. The smallest number of
activities was put on by organisations based in the East, representing 3 per cent of the total.
43 per cent of the attendance at performances, exhibition days and film screening days held in
England was at activities put on by organisations based in London, followed by 13 per cent at
national organisations. Organisations based in the East had the lowest levels of attendance, with 3
per cent.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge32
Figure 26: Regional breakdown of performances, exhibitions and film screening days
2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 27 compares the number of performances, exhibitions days and film screening days put on
in England in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 among the constant sample of 678 organisations that
completed the annual submission in each year. On average, activities have increased by 6 per
cent since 2012/13. National organisations saw the greatest increase in the 3 year period, with 21
per cent. The South West and West Midlands both saw a decrease in their activities of 6 per cent
and 32 per cent respectively.
Figure 27: Change in the number of performances, exhibition days and film screening days
per region 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge33
Figure 28 shows the total levels of attendance (known plus estimated) grouped by region for the
constant sample of organisations that completed the annual submission in 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15. Overall, there has been a 5 per cent increase in attendances since 2012/13. The North
West saw the highest increase in attendance figures with an increase of 28 per cent. The greatest
decrease in attendance levels was seen in the South West, at 21 per cent since 2012/13.
Figure 28: Change in the number of attendances at performances, exhibition days and film
screening days per region 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
6.1.2 Total activities and audiences by artform
Figure 29 shows the percentage breakdown of performances, exhibition days and film screenings
in 2014/15 by artform. An organisation’s artform classifier is given to them by the Arts Council and
reflects the artistic activity for which they primarily receive funding. It may not cover all of their
artistic output.
Visual arts organisations had the highest number of activities, with 38 per cent of the total. The
lowest number of arts activities were put on by not artform specific organisations (2 per cent of the
total).
Figure 29 also shows the highest proportion of audiences attended arts activities at organisations
within the combined arts portfolio, which accounted for 39 per cent of total audiences in 2014/15.
Dance and literature organisations had the lowest attendances, with 2 per cent of the total each.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge34
Figure 29: Breakdown of performances, exhibition days and film screening days per
artform 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 30 compares the number of arts activities by artform for the organisations that completed
the annual submission in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15. The biggest change was for literature
organisations, with an increase of 34 per cent since 2013/14. Not artform specific and music
organisations both saw a decreased number of activities, with 24 per cent and 12 per cent
respectively.
Figure 30: Change in activities by artform 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample
(N=678)
Figure 31 shows the change in audiences (known plus estimated) for artforms since 2012/13
across the constant sample from the portfolio. Not artform specific organisation had the greatest
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge35
increase, with 154 per cent since 2012/13. Attendance at dance organisations saw the greatest
reduction in attendance, with a decrease of 15 per cent.
Figure 31: Change in the number of attendances at performances, exhibitions and film
screenings days 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
6.1.3 Cultural Olympiad
In the 2014/15 annual submission, we asked NPOs if they had led on or contributed to any project
or activity specifically created to celebrate the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. This is the
final year that this data will be collected. Of the 683 organisations analysed, 42 (6 per cent) said
that they had led on such a project (i.e. took full responsibility for developing and delivering the
activity). In addition, 76 (11 per cent) said that they had contributed to such a project, by which we
mean collaborating or partnering in the development and/or delivery.
6.2 New work commissioned
By new work, we mean works commissioned and paid for by a National Portfolio Organisation. In
the case of performing, producing and presenting organisations, it excludes new productions of
established repertoire, new translations and adaptions. These types of productions are discussed
in section 6.3.2.
Of the 683 NPOs who responded to the annual submission in 2014/15, 539 organisations (79 per
cent) commissioned at least one new work. Across the portfolio a total of 12,718 new works were
commissioned, involving 7903 artists from the UK and 1,558 artists from outside the UK. These
commissions vary considerably in size, including everything from individual poems to large-scale
public artworks.
Millions
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge36
Of the sample that commissioned new work, 364 organisations (68 per cent) commissioned fewer
than 10 new works, 165 organisations (31 per cent) commissioned between 10 and 100 new
works, and the remaining 10 (2 per cent) commissioned more than 100 new works. The
percentage of work that is made up of new commissions is shown later in Figure 35 and Figure 36.
Table 15 shows the percentage of total new works commissioned by each region. Organisations
based in London commissioned the highest proportion (68 per cent) of new works. London also
commissioned the highest proportion of UK artists (44 per cent) and non-UK artists (53 per cent).
Table 15: Breakdown of new commissioned work by region 2014/15 (N=539)
Table 16 shows how new work commissions are spread across the artforms. Visual arts
organisations commissioned the most new works, with 58 per cent of the total. These
organisations also commissioned the most UK and non-UK artists, at 27 per cent and 45 per cent
of the totals respectively.
Table 16: Breakdown of new commissioned work by artform 2014/15 (N=539)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge37
Figure 32 shows the change in the number of new works, UK artists and non-UK artists
commissioned in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 by the organisations that completed the
submissions in all three years. Since 2012/13 the number of new works commissioned has
decreased by 6 per cent. The number of UK artists commissioned has decreased by 13 per cent
and the number of non-UK artists has decreased by 11 per cent.
Figure 32: Change in number of new works commissioned 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=673)
6.3 Performances, productions and presentations
In 2014/15, 581 organisations (85 per cent) said that they had put on performances, productions
and presentations, including readings and story-telling. This category is a subset of the total arts
activities detailed in 6.1. For the purposes of this section, all these activities are referred to as
‘performances’ unless otherwise stated.
6.3.1 Performances
122,436 performances were held in England. These performances attracted a total audience of
43,189,415.
As shown in Figure 33, the highest number of performances (35 per cent of the total) were by
organisations based in London, followed by 13 per cent in the West Midlands. Organisations in the
North East put on the lowest number of performances, with 3 per cent of the total. Figure 33 also
shows the breakdown of attendances at performances by region. London had the highest
attendances at performances, with 48 per cent of the total, followed by national organisations with
15 per cent. Organisations in the East and North East attracted the lowest attendances, with 3 per
cent of the total each.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge38
Figure 33: Performances by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Analysed by artform (Figure 34) we can see that most of the total performances (48 per cent) were
put on by theatre organisations, followed by combined arts organisations, with 23 per cent of the
total performances. The lowest proportion of performances were put on by not artform specific
organisations with less than 1 per cent of the total. Figure 34 also shows how performance
attendance breaks down by artform. 46 per cent of attendances were for performances by
combined arts organisations, followed by 34 per cent in theatre organisations. Literature
organisations had the lowest attendances at performances, with 1 per cent of total attendance.
Figure 34: Performances by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge39
6.3.2 Performances by types of production
Organisations that put on performances were asked to break these down into new commissions,
established repertoire, revivals and productions by visiting companies.
Figure 35 shows the breakdown of production type by region. Productions by visiting companies
account for the most performances in all regions, except for London and national organisations,
the East having the highest of these with 70 per cent. Most of the productions (33 per cent) in
London were new commissions, and 83 per cent of productions in national organisations were
established repertoire. Revivals make up the lowest proportion of all productions for all regions.
Figure 35: Production type by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 36 shows the same production types broken down by artform. Visiting companies are the
highest proportion of productions for combined arts (55 per cent), dance (45 per cent) and theatre
(63 per cent) organisations. New work is greatest for literature (37 per cent) and not artform
specific (81 per cent) organisations. Established repertoire is 36 per cent of performances at music
organisations. Visual arts organisations have the greatest proportion of their work from new
commissions (48 per cent).
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge40
Figure 36: Production types by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
6.3.3 Tickets for performances
The data in this section relates only to organisations that sold tickets for their performances. A
total of 447 organisations (77 per cent) that put on performance activities sold tickets. There were
32,969,519 available tickets during 2014/15, of which 24,200,526 (73 per cent) were sold. This
generated a total ticket yield of £492,627,832
As shown in figure 37, the highest number of tickets available (27 per cent) were at national
organisations, as were 29 per cent of the tickets sold. The highest ticket yield was also at national
organisations (49 per cent of the total)
Figure 37: Ticket sales for performances by region 2014/15 (N=447)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge41
When compared by artform, as in Figure 38, the most tickets available and sold were in theatre
organisations (56 per cent for each). Literature organisations had the highest proportion of ticket
sales to those available, with 62 per cent, and theatre organisations had the highest total ticket
yield, 60 per cent of the total.
Figure 38: Ticket sales for performances by artform 2014/15 (N=447)
Figure 39 compares the tickets available and sold in each region in 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15. The biggest increase in ticket sales was seen in national organisations, where ticket
sales increased by 35 per cent since 2012/13. The biggest decline was seen in the East Midlands,
with a decrease of 10 per cent.
Figure 39: Change in tickets available and sold per region 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge42
Figure 40 shows the change in ticket sales by artform. Visual arts organisations had the highest
increase of tickets sold since 2012/13 (an increase of 30 per cent). Not artform specific had the
greatest increase in available tickets (31 per cent).
Figure 40: Change in ticket sales available and sold per artform 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=388)
6.3.4 Children and young people performances
Of the 133,336 performances that were put on in England in 2014/15, 26,622 were specifically for
children and young people (CYP) in the 4-19 age range in full time education. These
performances are in addition to the education and learning sessions detailed in section 6.6. The
organisations had a total attendance of 10,470,130 at the performances put on for CYP groups.
Figure 41 shows that London had the highest share of CYP performances, with 39 per cent of the
total activities. London also had the highest proportion of attendance at school performances, with
57 per cent of the total.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge43
Figure 41: CYP performances by region, 2014/15 (N=388)
Figure 42 shows how the CYP performances break down by artform. Theatre organisations put on
the highest number with 46 per cent of the total, and combined arts organisations had the highest
share of the attendance with 59 per cent of the total audience.
Figure 42: CYP performances by artform 2014/15 (N=388)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge44
6.4 Exhibitions and film screenings
Exhibition days and film screening days were also counted within the headline arts activities
discussed in section 6.1. This section looks more closely at exhibition and film screening days and
their audiences, separated by region and artform.
6.4.1 Exhibitions
In 2014/15, 378 organisations (55 per cent of the organisations that completed the annual
submission) said that they had put on exhibitions and/or film screenings as part of their work. They
had put on 4375 exhibitions for a total of 153,580 days. Of these, 137,120 exhibition days took
place in England. These exhibitions attracted a total known attendance of 36,510,049 and a
further 40,180,531 estimated attendance, giving a total attendance of 76,690,580.
As shown in figure 43, London had the highest share of exhibition days, with 36 per cent, followed
by Yorkshire with 13 per cent. Organisations in the East had the lowest number of exhibition days
with 2 per cent of the total. London had the highest share of attendances at 40 per cent followed
by national organisations with 11 per cent. Organisations in the East had the lowest attendance at
exhibition days with 2 per cent of the total.
Figure 43: Exhibition days by region 2014/15 (N=378)
When compared by artform (Figure 44), visual arts put on the highest number of exhibition days
with 57 per cent. Visual arts also had the highest number of attendances with 48 per cent of the
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge45
total attendance. Combined arts organisations had the second highest level of activities and
attendance with 27 per cent and 32 per cent respectively.
Figure 44: Exhibitions by artform 2014/15 (N=378)
6.4.2 Film screening days
The organisations that had put on exhibition and film screening days showed 13,242 films over
50,656 screening days, of which 42,495 were in England. The film screening days in England
attracted a known audience of 2,605,471 and an additional 1,280,755 estimated attendance,
giving a total audience of 3,814,226.
Figure 45 shows the regional breakdown of film screening days in England in 2014/15. London
had the highest share with 33 per cent of the total film screening days, followed by the East
Midlands with 16 per cent. The lowest number of film screening days took place in the East with 1
per cent. The highest attendances at film screening days were in London (24 per cent) followed by
national organisations (16 per cent). The lowest attendances were recorded in the East with 1 per
cent of the total.
Figure 45: Film screening days by region 2014/15 (N=378)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge46
When compared by artform (as shown in Figure 46), visual arts organisations put on 56 per cent of
film screening days during 2014/15, followed by combined arts organisations, who put on 27 per
cent. Visual arts organisations also had the highest amount of attendances, at 535 per cent of the
total.
Figure 46: Film screening days by artform 2014/15 (N=378)
6.5 Publications
A total of 450 organisations said that they had produced publications during 2014/15. Publications
include books, directories, magazines, educational resource packs, DVDs and CDs. These
organisations were asked for further details of the number of titles they had published, and the
sales and distribution figures for these publications. Sales and distribution was measured by the
number of copies rather than monetary value.
Publications have been broken down into books, DVDs, CDs and other publications for each
artform. As publication is not restricted by geographical or regional boundaries, there are no
regional breakdowns for these figures.
6.5.1 Books
Organisations had published a total of 1,497 new book titles over 2014/15, as well as maintaining
13,709 backlist book titles. Sales and distribution of new book titles totalled 400,248 and sales and
distribution of backlist titles totalled 433,200.
Figure 47 shows the publication of new and backlist title book publications by artform. Literature
organisations had the highest share of new titles available, with 58 per cent of the total. Literature
organisations also had the highest proportion of backlist titles available, with 67 per cent, and the
highest sales and distribution of new and backlist titles, with 50 and 57 per cent respectively.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge47
Figure 47: Publications of new and backlist titles by artform 2014/15 (N=450)
6.5.2 Other publications
Organisations were also asked if they had produced any other publications, such as directories,
newsletters, journals, catalogues, exhibition publications or educational resource packs. These are
referred to as paper-based publications in the section below. Organisations are also asked about
the publications of DVDs or CDs.
A total of 315,317 paper-based publications were released in 2014/15, with total sales/distribution
of 15,345,635. The highest number of paper-based publications was produced by combined arts
organisations (76 per cent), as shown in Figure 48. The highest sales/distribution of paper-based
publications was seen in visual arts organisations (41 per cent).
Figure 48: Paper-based publications by artform 2014/15 (N=450)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge48
6.5.3 DVDs and CDs
In 2014/15, NPOs produced 59,359 DVDs or CDs, with a total sales and distributions figure of
586,633. As shown in Figure 49, Music organisations published the most DVDs and CDs (94 per
cent of the total) and had the highest share of sales/distribution (60 per cent). Dance, literature
and not artform specific organisations produced the lowest number of DVDs and CDs, at less than
1 per cent of the total each and literature and not artform specific organisations also had the
lowest proportion of sales and distribution (less than 1 per cent each).
Figure 49: DVDs and CDs by artform 2014/15 (N=450)
6.6 Education, learning and participation
There were 417 NPOs (61 per cent) that employed someone specifically to deliver education and
learning work. 435 organisations (64 per cent) had a written education policy strategy. Of these,
378 organisations had both. Programmes of education involved 23,003 artists, and a total
attendance of 8,255,685.
Among the constant sample, the number of artists and the number of attendances have increased
since 2012/13.
Table 17: Changes in educational programme 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant
sample (N=678)
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
% change 2012/13 - 2014/15
Number of artists 22779 23311 22864 0.37%
Total attendance 6335898 8571330 8255685 30.30%
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge49
6.6.2 Formal education sessions
Formal education sessions are those which are connected to the school curriculum for students
aged 4-19. In 2014/15 sessions were attended by 8,384,417 people.
Figure 50: Formal education sessions by region 2014/15 (N=683)
Figure 51 shows the artform distribution of known attendance at formal education sessions for the
0-19 year old age group. Literature organisations have the highest attendance, with 41 per cent,
followed by theatre organisations with 17 per cent. Not artform specific organisations have the
lowest attendance at formal education sessions, with 1 per cent of the total.
Figure 51: Formal education sessions by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge50
7 ANALYSIS OF INCOME BY ATTENDANCE
Income and subsidy per attendance are calculated for 2014/15 as presented in section 5.1, and
total attendance data for activities in England as presented in section 6.1. Total attendance used
to calculate income and subsidy per attendance includes known and estimated audiences for
performances, productions, exhibition days, film screening days and education, learning and
participation activities.
The average total subsidy per attendance, which includes Arts Council subsidy, local authority and
other public subsidy for the same sample, was £6.52 per attendance.
7.1 Subsidy per attendance
Subsidy per attendance represents how much subsidy our NPOs receive in order to generate one
attendance.
The total subsidy per attendance for all artforms and regions of £6.52 breaks down as £4.40 per
attendance coming from Arts Council subsidy, £0.84 from local authority funding and £1.27 per
attendance from other public subsidy.
7.1.1 Regional analysis
Regional breakdown of subsidy per attendance in Figure 52 shows that the East had the highest
levels of subsidy per attendance in 2014/15 with £11.29 Spent per attendance. The London region
had the lowest subsidy, with £3.86 per attendance. A detailed analysis of subsidy per attendance,
by subsidy category, is given in Figure 53
Figure 52: Breakdown of total subsidy per attendance by region 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge51
Figure 53: Detailed breakdown of subsidy per attendance by region 2014/15 (N=683)
7.1.2 Artform analysis
Figure 54 shows the breakdown of total subsidy per attendance by artform. Music organisations
had the highest subsidy per attendance at £24.21. Combined arts organisations had the lowest
subsidy per attendance, at £3.67. A more detailed breakdown of subsidy per attendance by
subsidy category is given in Figure 55.
Figure 54: Breakdown of total subsidy per attendance by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge52
Figure 55: Detailed breakdown of subsidy per attendance by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
7.1.3 Changes since 2012/13
When data for the constant sample of organisations for 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 are
compared, as in Figure 56, Arts Council subsidy per attendance has decreased from £4.60 to
£4.48, a change of 3 per cent.
Figure 56 also shows that Arts Council subsidy decreased in all regions except for the East and
the South West, which saw increases of 9 and 31 per cent respectively.
Figure 56: Changes in Arts Council subsidy per attendance by region 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge53
Figure 57 shows the changes in Arts Council subsidy in each artform since 2012/13. Arts Council
subsidy per attendance decreased in all artforms except dance, music and visual arts. The largest
increase was in visual arts organisations, with 17 per cent.
Figure 57: Changes in Arts Council subsidy per attendance by artform 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
7.2 Earned income per attendance
Earned income per attendance represents how much (in £s) our NPOs earn from each
attendance.
7.2.1 Regional analysis
Overall, the earned income per attendance for all organisations was £8.66 per attendance. Figure
58 shows the earned income per attendance in each region. National organisations had the
highest earned income per attendance, with £21.37, followed by organisations in the South East,
with £13.64. The lowest earned income per attendance was recorded by organisations in London
with £5.10.
Figure 58: Earned income per attendance by region 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge54
7.2.2 Artform analysis
Figure 59 shows that music organisations have the highest earned income per attendance
(£28.65). Not artform specific organisations had the lowest income per attendance in 2014/15, with
£0.66.
Figure 59: Earned income per attendance by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge55
8 TOURING DATA
By touring activities we mean work presented away from the home base or host venue of an
organisation. Touring activities that are measured by the annual submission include performances,
productions, readings, exhibition days and film screening days, but exclude education workshop
sessions. Organisations that toured were asked for details of each touring activity including the
number of times it was presented, the postcode of the venue (if in the UK), the country (if
overseas) and the total audience at each venue.
There were 360 organisations that reported touring activities in 2014/15. We refer to these as
‘touring organisations’. Touring organisations represent 53 per cent of the total number of
organisations responding to the annual submission in 2014/15, compared to 50 per cent in
2013/14.
Some organisations were unable to provide full details of all their toured activity and therefore the
data in this section can only give a partial picture of toured activities and audiences. It should also
be recognised that organisations vary considerably in the amount of touring that they do. Some
touring organisations will only do a few touring activities in a year, but for others touring is a
significant part of their work, and the primary reason for why they receive Arts Council funding.
8.1 Regional and artform distribution of touring organisations
Table 18 shows the number of touring organisations based in each region and the percentage that
this represents of the total organisations based in that region. In numerical terms London has the
highest number of touring organisations (145) which represents 58 per cent of the organisations
based there. Organisations in the West Midlands had the highest percentage of touring
organisations of all organisations in that region, with 67 per cent. The East Midlands has the
smallest number of touring organisations, with 17, and also the lowest percentage of touring
organisations, with 40 per cent.
Table 18: Number and proportion of touring organisations by region 2014/15 (N=360)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge56
Figure 60 shows the proportion of touring organisations per region over the last 3 years. The
proportion of touring organisations has increased over time in all regions. The South East has
seen the greatest increase, from 43% of organisations touring in 2012/13, to 61% in 2014/15.
Figure 60: Proportion of touring organisations by region 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
(N=full sample for each year)
The artform distribution of touring organisations is presented in Table 19. Theatre has the highest
number of organisations (140) that have undertaken touring activities in 2014/15. This represents
78 per cent of all theatre organisations in the portfolio. This is followed by dance organisations at
68 per cent. The lowest number of touring organisations were seen in not artform specific, with 2
(11 per cent.)
Table 19: Number and proportion of touring organisations by artform 2014/15 (N=360)
Figure 61 shows the proportion of touring organisations per artform over the last 3 years. The
proportion of touring organisations has increased over time for all artforms.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge57
Figure 61: Proportion of touring organisations by artform 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
(N=full sample for each year)
8.2 Reach of touring activities
This section considers the national and international reach of toured activities by NPOs. Table 20
presents a breakdown of the locations of the toured activities by NPOs, separated by the home
region of the organisations doing touring activity within their home region, but away from their
home base or venue. So for example, organisations in the East did 30 per cent of their toured
activity within the East region, but away from their home base of venue.
Touring within an organisations home region is the most common form of touring activities in all
regions, except for London, which had 27 per cent of its touring hosted in Non-UK locations, and
the South East, which toured 41 per cent of its work overseas. The proportion of toured activity
taking place in the organisations home region varies from 20 per cent of all toured activity for
organisations based in the South East, to 56 per cent of all toured activity for organisations based
in the South West.
Table 20: Location of toured activity by home region of organisation 2014/15 (N=360)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge58
Table 21 shows the breakdown of the location of touring activities by artform. Visual arts have the
highest proportion of touring that took place outside of the UK, with 33 per cent.
Table 21: Location of toured activity by artform of organisation 2014/15 (N=360)
Table 22 shows the top 20 toured to local authorities in England, ranked in order of the number of
touring activities that took place there.
Table 22: Top 20 England Local Authorities in terms of number of toured activities 2014/15
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge59
Table 23 shows the top 20 local authorities in England based on NPOs reporting touring activity
within the local authority.
Table 23: Top 20 England Local Authorities in terms of number of NPOs reporting touring
activity within the LA area, 2014/15
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge60
9 MAJOR PARTNER MUSEUMS
Major Partner Museums (MPMs have been part of the regularly funded portfolio of organisations
since 2012. The 2014/15 submission completes the first 3 year funding round for MPMs.
9.1 Income and expenditure
Figure 62 shows the breakdown of income sources for the MPMs. In 2014/15, Earned income
accounts for the greatest proportion of the income, at 33 per cent, and contributed income the
least at 7 per cent. Since 2012/13 local authority income and contributed income have decreased,
by 3 per cent and 13 per cent respectively. Earned income has increased since 2012/13 by 19 per
cent.
Figure 62: Breakdown of MPM income by source 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 (N=16)
Figure 63 shows the breakdown of expenditure by MPMs for staff and non-staff related outgoings.
In 2014/15, artistic programme accounts for the greatest proportion of expenditure at 47 per cent.
Governance and Collections/acquisitions are the lowest expenditure categories, at 1 per cent of
the combined staff and non-staff total each.
Figure 63: Breakdown of MPM expenditure by staff and non-staff 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 (N=16)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge61
9.2 Activities and visitors
Table 24 shows the breakdown of activities by MPMs for 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15.
Attendance and participation includes known and estimated figures. There was an increase in
performances of 1 per cent. All other activities have seen a small increase, but have remained
stable.
Table 24: Breakdown of MPM activities 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 (N=16)
*Outreach and on-site activities for Children and Young People includes both school/college and non-school/college activities
Figure 64 shows the proportion of self-directed visitors by MPMs by age range for both on and off-
site activities. Self-directed visits by adults decreased by 23 per cent from 2012/13, and by 44 per
cent for CYP. The proportion of visits by people of unknown age increased by 58% in the period.
The total number of visitors has increased by 11 per cent since 2012/13.
Figure 64: Proportion of visits by self-directed visitors 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 (N=16)
Figure 65 gives the breakdown of self-directed school visits to MPMs by key stage. Key stage 2
visits make up the greatest proportion of visits in 2014/15, with 44 per cent of all self-directed
school visits coming from this group. The greatest increase was for key stage 1 visits, with an
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge62
increase of 19 per cent since 2012/13. Preschool visits saw the greatest reduction, with 74 per
cent less than in 2012/13. The number of visits has increased by 29 per cent since 2012/13.
Figure 65: Proportion of MPM visits by self-directed school visits 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 (N=16)
Figure 66 gives the average size of the group visits, and shows key stage 3 groups have the
highest number of visitors per group in 2014/15. The greatest increase is in Preschool visits,
where the average group size has increased by 221% over the 3 years.
Figure 66: Self-directed school visits by average visit size 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
(N=16)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge63
Figure 67 shows the breakdown of facilitated school visits to MPMs in 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 by key stage. Overall, visits fell by 8 per cent, with the greatest decrease in key stage 2
groups (18 per cent). Visits by key stage 5 groups increased by 22 per cent.
Figure 67: Proportion of Major Partner Museums by facilitated school visits 2012/13,
2013/14 and 2014/15 (N=16)
Figure 68 shows these visits by average visit size. Group sizes have remained relatively stable in
the three year period.
Figure 68: Facilitated school visits by average visit size 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
(N=16)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge64
Figure 69 shows the proportion of higher education visits to MPMs by visitors from England, the
rest of the UK and overseas. In 2014/15 49 per cent of visitors came from students in England,
while 48 per cent were overseas students.
Figure 69: Proportion of Major Partner Museums by higher education visits 2012/13,
2013/14 and 2014/15
Figure 70 shows higher education visits by average visit size.
Figure 70: Higher education by visits by average visit size 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
(N=16)
9.3 Subsidy
Figure 71 shows the average amount of subsidy per visitor in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 by
income stream. In 2014/15 the total subsidy per visitor was £5.86. Local authority subsidy made
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge65
up the greatest proportion of this, at £2.47. Arts Council subsidy equates to £1.55 per visitor.
Overall, subsidy per visitor has dropped from £6.60 in 2012/13.
Figure 71: Breakdown of average amount of subsidy per visitor 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 (N=16)
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge66
APPENDIX 1 GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS
Activities
The number of opportunities an organisation provides for audiences to attend or participate in. The
numbers given refer to all activities taking place between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2015.
Artform
This is the main artform that the organisation is funded for by the Arts Council. Regularly funded
organisations are classified under one of seven different artforms: combined arts, dance, literature,
music, theatre, visual arts and not artform specific. The artform assigned to a particular
organisation is related to the principal area of work that Arts Council England’s funding supports.
If Arts Council funding is distributed to more than one artform in a particular organisation, then this
organisation’s artform will be classified as combined arts. Combined arts categorises
organisations and practices that do not fit within one arts genre. It includes organisations and
practices that do not fit within one arts genre. It includes organisations serving particular cultural or
geographical communities. Combined arts are multidisciplinary, and include arts centres, rural
touring, carnival arts, festivals and participatory organisations.
Not artform specific describes those organisations which cannot be specifically categorised into
the six other artforms.
Artistic programme costs
Expenditure on staff involved in an organisation’s artistic programme or main activity and on non-
staff costs such as production costs and venue hire.
Artistic staff
This category refers to artists, dances, actors, singers, musicians, curators, directors,
choreographers, producers, programmers, writers, composers, designers etc, and includes the
artistic director. This category also includes educational, marketing and audience development
staff.
Arts Council England subsidy
All subsidies received from Arts Council England, both grant-in-aid (government) funding, and
lottery funding. Capital funding is excluded.
Attendance
This refers to the number of people attending activities. Attendance can be Known (an actual
audience count which has been calculated using precise methods such as ticket sales) or
Estimated (any estimated attendance over and above the known attendance, that cannot be
precisely measured, such as audiences for festivals or carnivals.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge67
Black or minority-ethnic focused activity
Any activity that is directed at enhancing Black or minority ethnic people’s participation in the arts
through specific activities.
Contractual/freelance
This includes all staff hired for a particular programme on a contract of less than 52 weeks. It also
includes those hired on short term contracts such as consultants and self-employed people and
artists. Such staff may be hired more than once in a year but are counted once only.
Contributed income
All sponsorships from business organisations, income from corporate membership schemes,
money from trusts or foundations and money received from the general public for which no benefit
is received in return.
Cost of generating funds
Expenditure associated with generating incoming resources from all sources other than from
undertaking charitable activities. This is primarily the costs associated with fundraising and
generating voluntary income, but also the cost of managing investments.
Disability Discrimination Act
This defined a person with a disability as someone who has a physical or mental impairment that
has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day to day
activities.
Disability-focused activity
Any activity that is directed at enhancing disabled peoples’ participation through the arts through
specific activities.
Earned income
All income generated by an organisation’s artistic activity, educational activity and any
supplementary activity including trading income and bank interest is included in earned income.
This includes box office receipts, engagement and other fees, entrance charges, sales of books
and magazines, workshop fees, individual membership fees etc.
Education programme costs
This is expenditure on staff and non-staff costs associated with an organisation’s education
programme. For some organisations this may be their main or only activity. Educational activity is
about learning in the arts (skills and techniques) about the arts (knowledge and appreciation) or
through the arts (using the arts to develop in other areas, such as personal and social skills, or
history.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge68
Exhibition days
This refers to the number of days an exhibition is open to public view. Exhibition days are
calculated for each separate exhibition then totalled, therefore where two (or more) exhibitions are
presented on the same day, this will contribute two (or more) to the exhibition days total.
Film screening days
This refers to the number of days is film is exhibited. Film screening days are calculated for each
separate film and then totalled, therefore where two (or more) films are presented on the same
day, this will contribute two (or more) to the film screening days in total. Where a number of short
films are shown in one programme at one session, this is counted as one film screening.
Governance costs
Expenditure on costs of governance for running the organisation, items such as internal and
external audit, legal advice and costs associated with constitutional and statutory requirements.
Home base or host venue
These are the central premises owned or leased (long-term) by an organisation, which are the
usual premises for the organisations activities. If an organisation works from several premises, its
head office will be classed as its home base.
Local authority subsidy
All subsidies received from local authorities.
Managers
This category includes executive or senior management staff, for example, executive director,
finance director, chief accountant, general manager, human resources manager and legal
advisers.
Marketing costs
Expenditure for marketing and promotion, including staff costs. This includes both production
specific and generic organisation marketing.
National company
National companies are ten large organisations whose work has a significant reach beyond the
region in which they are located.
Other costs
Expenditure on all other costs apart from artistic programme, education programme, marketing
costs, costs of generating funds and overheads.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge69
Other public subsidy
All subsidies received from sources other than Arts Council England and local authorities,
including that received from other funding bodies, other government departments and EU funding
sources.
Other staff
These are administrative and technical staff not counted as artistic staff or managers, for example
finance, reception, box-office staff and sound technicians.
Outliers
If one or more organisations provide figures that are extremely high or low, they can sometimes
skew the data and misrepresent the overall figures. In these cases the extreme numbers are
removed.
Overheads
This includes all overheads, such as administration costs (post, telephone, insurance etc) and
premises costs (rent, heating, lighting etc). It also includes expenditure on staff directly involved in
the area of overheads, such as administrators and operations staff.
Performances
This is the total number of performances, productions, presentations, concerts and readings taking
place in England. This covers all performances, including school performances, and broadcast
(live or recorded) performances.
Permanent staff
All staff on fixed-term contracts of 52 weeks or more counts as permanent. If they work 35 hours
or more a week, they are classed as full-time, if less than 35 hours a week they are classed as
part-time.
Publications
This refers to the production and distribution of books, directories, journals, catalogues,
magazines, DVDs and CDs.
Region
This refers to the region where the organisations home base is located (or head office if it has
more than one base). All regional classifications in this report use this definition, with the exception
of touring data, which can be precisely geographically located as well.
Sales and distribution
This is the total figure for sales and distribution figures of publications. This includes any
complimentary/free publicity distribution. This is the number of publications that were
sold/distributed, not a monetary (£) figure.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge70
Schools performances
This is the number of performances, productions, presentations, concerts and readings etc for
young people in the age range of 4 -19 in full-time education. This is a subset of the total number
of performances put on by an organisation.
Touring activity
This refers to all work that was presented away from an organisations home base or host venue
(temporary or permanent). The term ‘home-base’ refers to premises owned by the organisation or
premises on which the organisation holds a long term lease. Touring activity may include
productions, exhibitions, readings, screenings etc. These figures include any schools
performances specifically for young people in full-time education (4-19 age group), but do not
include workshops, seminars, lectures, residencies or courses.
Volunteers
Any staff member who receives no wages or salary, or who receives no more than basic
expenses, for example travel costs. This refers to volunteers who actually helped between 1 April
2014 and 31 March 2015, and not those available to help. Members of an organisation’s board or
governing body are not included as volunteers as they are counted separately.
Workshop sessions
This refers to all forms of learning or participatory activity, including formal and informal education
sessions for people of all ages, and professional training sessions.
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge71
APPENDIX 2 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Tables
Table 1 Regional abbreviations list 6
Table 2 Artform abbreviations list 6
Table 3 Breakdown of NPOs by region 2014/15 (N=683) 8
Table 4 Breakdown of NPOs by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 9
Table 5 Percentage change of ethnic diversity of staff 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
14
Table 6 Staff with and without a disability 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant
sample (N=678)
16
Table 7 Percentage change in breakdown of total income 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
23
Table 8 Breakdown of Arts Council subsidy by region 2014/15 (N=683) 24
Table 9 Breakdown of Arts Council subsidy by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 24
Table 10 Breakdown of contributed income by region 2014/15 (N=683) 25
Table 11 Breakdown of contributed income by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 25
Table 12 Breakdown of total expenditure by region 2014/15 (N=683) 27
Table 13 Breakdown of total expenditure by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 27
Table 14 Percentage change in breakdown of total expenditure 2012/13, 2013/14
and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
29
Table 15 Breakdown of new commissioned work by region 2014/15 (N=539) 36
Table 16 Breakdown of new commissioned work by artform 2014/15 (N=539) 36
Table 17 Changes in educational programme 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678)
48
Table 18 Number and proportion of touring organisations by region 2014/15
(N=360)
55
Table 19 Number and proportion of touring organisations by artform 2014/15
(N=360)
56
Table 20 Location of toured activity by home region of organisation 2014/15
(N=360)
57
Table 21 Location of toured activity by artform of organisation 2014/15 (N=360) 58
Table 22 Top 20 England Local Authorities in terms of number of toured activities
2014/15
58
Table 23 Top 20 England Local Authorities in terms of number of NPOs reporting
touring activity within the LA area, 2014/15
59
Table 24 Breakdown of MPM activities 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 (N=16) 61
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge72
Figures
Figure 1 Regional map of England 7
Figure 2 Key statistics comparison by region 2014/15 (N=683) 10
Figure 3 Key statistics comparison by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 11
Figure 4 Comparison of staff numbers between 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678)
12
Figure 5 Ethnic diversity of staff in National Portfolio Organisations 2014/15
(N=683).
13
Figure 6 Proportion of permanent/contractual staff by ethnicity group 2014/15
(N=683)
13
Figure 7 Breakdown of staff by ethnicity in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/14 constant
sample (N=678)
14
Figure 8 Breakdown of ethnic diversity of staff by position 2014/15 (N=683) 14
Figure 9 Proportion of Black and minority ethnic groups by position held in
2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
15
Figure 10 Permanent and contractual staff with and without disability 2014/15
(N=683)
15
Figure 11 Disability status of staff by position 2014/15 (N=683) 16
Figure 12 Proportion of staff with a disability by position held in 2012/13, 2013/14
and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
17
Figure 13 Gender balance for permanent and contractual staff 2014/15 (N=683) 17
Figure 14 Gender breakdown by staff position 2014/15 (N=683) 17
Figure 15 Gender proportion by staff position 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678)
18
Figure 16 Black and minority ethnic-led and Black and minority ethnic-focused
organisations by region 2014/15 (N=683)
19
Figure 17 Black and minority ethnic-led and Black and minority ethnic-focused
organisations by artform 2014/15 (N=683)
19
Figure 18 Disability-led and disability-focused organisations by region 2014/15
(N=683)
20
Figure 19 Disability-led and disability-focused organisations by artform 2014/15
(N=683)
20
Figure 20 Breakdown of total income by region 2014/15 (N=683) 22
Figure 21 Breakdown of total income by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 23
Figure 22 Breakdown of contributed income in 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678)
26
Figure 23 Breakdown of total expenditure categories by region 2014/15 (N=683) 28
Figure 24 Breakdown of total expenditure categories by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 29
Figure 25 Breakdown of expenditure by type for 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678)
30
Figure 26 Regional breakdown of performances, exhibitions and film screening days
2014/15 (N=683)
32
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge73
Figure 27 Change in the number of performances, exhibition days and film
screening days per region 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant
sample (N=678)
32
Figure 28 Change in the number of attendances at performances, exhibition days
and film screening days per region 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
constant sample (N=678)
33
Figure 29 Breakdown of performances, exhibition days and film screening days per
artform 2014/15 (N=683)
34
Figure 30 Change in activities by artform 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant
sample (N=678)
34
Figure 31 Change in the number of attendances at performances, exhibitions and
film screenings days 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample
(N=678)
35
Figure 32 Change in number of new works commissioned 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=673)
37
Figure 33 Performances by region 2014/15 (N=683) 38
Figure 34 Performances by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 38
Figure 35 Production type by region 2014/15 (N=683) 39
Figure 36 Production types by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 40
Figure 37 Ticket sales for performances by region 2014/15 (N=447) 40
Figure 38 Ticket sales for performances by artform 2014/15 (N=447) 41
Figure 39 Change in tickets available and sold per region 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
41
Figure 40 Change in ticket sales available and sold per artform 2012/13, 2013/14
and 2014/15 constant sample (N=388)
42
Figure 41 CYP performances by region, 2014/15 (N=388) 43
Figure 42 CYP performances by artform 2014/15 (N=388) 43
Figure 43 Exhibition days by region 2014/15 (N=378) 44
Figure 44 Exhibitions by artform 2014/15 (N=378) 45
Figure 45 Film screening days by region 2014/15 (N=378) 45
Figure 46 Film screening days by artform 2014/15 (N=378) 46
Figure 47 Publications of new and backlist titles by artform 2014/15 (N=450) 47
Figure 48 Paper-based publications by artform 2014/15 (N=450) 47
Figure 49 DVDs and CDs by artform 2014/15 (N=450) 48
Figure 50 Formal education sessions by region 2014/15 (N=683) 49
Figure 51 Formal education sessions by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 49
Figure 52 Breakdown of total subsidy per attendance by region 2014/15 (N=683) 50
Figure 53 Detailed breakdown of subsidy per attendance by region 2014/15
(N=683)
51
Figure 54 Breakdown of total subsidy per attendance by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 51
Figure 55 Detailed breakdown of subsidy per attendance by artform 2014/15
(N=683)
52
National Portfolio Organisations Annual Submission 2014/15
Think before you print
Pa
ge74
Figure 56 Changes in Arts Council subsidy per attendance by region 2012/13,
2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
52
Figure 57 Changes in Arts Council subsidy per attendance by artform 2012/13,
2013/14 and 2014/15 constant sample (N=678)
53
Figure 58 Earned income per attendance by region 2014/15 (N=683) 53
Figure 59 Earned income per attendance by artform 2014/15 (N=683) 54
Figure 60 Proportion of touring organisations by region 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 (N=full sample for each year)
56
Figure 61 Proportion of touring organisations by artform 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 (N=full sample for each year)
57
Figure 62 Breakdown of MPM income by source 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
(N=16)
60
Figure 63 Breakdown of MPM expenditure by staff and non-staff 2012/13, 2013/14
and 2014/15 (N=16)
60
Figure 64 Proportion of visits by self-directed visitors 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15
(N=16)
61
Figure 65 Proportion of MPM visits by self-directed school visits 2012/13, 2013/14
and 2014/15 (N=16)
62
Figure 66 Self-directed school visits by average visit size 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 (N=16)
62
Figure 67 Proportion of Major Partner Museums by facilitated school visits 2012/13,
2013/14 and 2014/15 (N=16)
63
Figure 68 Facilitated school visits by average visit size 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 (N=16)
63
Figure 69 Proportion of Major Partner Museums by higher education visits 2012/13,
2013/14 and 2014/15
64
Figure 70 Higher education by visits by average visit size 2012/13, 2013/14 and
2014/15 (N=16)
64
Figure 71 Breakdown of average amount of subsidy per visitor 2012/13, 2013/14
and 2014/15 (N=16)
65