Upload
giona
View
43
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
National PBIS Forum October 2012. Sheri Luecking , Illinois PBIS Network Robert Stevens, Charleston, SC. The Evolution of Social Workers in Illinois . Completing an average of 50-100 SDS’s a year SSW doing individual counseling all day SSW addressing perceived crisis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
National PBIS Forum
October 2012Sheri Luecking, Illinois PBIS NetworkRobert Stevens, Charleston, SC
The Evolution of Social Workers in Illinois
0 Completing an average of 50-100 SDS’s a year
0 SSW doing individual counseling all day
0 SSW addressing perceived crisis0 Sitting in IEP meetings0 SSW delivering classroom groups in
isolation.
0 Leading Tier 2 and 3 teams0 Coordinating Tertiary Interventions
(Using Data)0 Facilitating FBA/BIP teams0 Facilitating Wraparound teams 0 Coordinating Secondary
Interventions (Using Data)0 Lead small group interventions0 Coordinate Check in Check out and
Check and Connect intervention0 Organizing Universal Screening for all
Students 0 Continuing Education for all staff0 Provide individual skill building that is
based on data
Response to Intervention: New Roles for School Social Workers By Kate Usaj, MSSA, LISW; Judith Kullas Shine, MSW, MS, LICSW; and Myrna Mandlawitz, M.Ed., JDSchool Social Work Association of America
•Early intervention with struggling learners to link them with appropriate resources. • Ongoing progress monitoring. • Comprehensive formal and informal ecological assessments including academic functioning, social/emotional and mental health functioning, adaptive functioning, and family and community interactions. • Development of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS). • Development and monitoring of Behavioral Intervention Plans (BIP). • Comprehensive family services. • Individual counseling services. • Small group counseling. • Community liaison to ensure adequate and appropriate resources for students and families in need. • Helping students to develop and maintain personal, social and academic competencies. • Consultation to and with educators to ensure understanding and support of struggling learners. • Crisis response for students in critical need (e.g. suicide ideation, self-harm, family crisis, homelessness).
To meet this challenge, school social workers will need to:
0 Be willing to re-examine their approaches to change and problem resolution.
0 Take risks in terms of attempting new interventions and strategies.0 Examine their beliefs about special education and services to students
with special needs.0 Engage in regular and ongoing professional development opportunities.0 Be more physically available to the classroom.0 Examine their personal service delivery system and make adaptations to
better serve students.0 Determine more efficient ways to provide services to more students.0 Become more expert in data collection.
Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions 1-5%•Individual students•Assessment-based•High intensity
1-5% Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions• Individual students• Assessment-based• Intense, durable procedures
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions 5-15%•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response•Small group interventions• Some individualizing
5-15% Tier 2/Secondary Interventions• Some students (at-risk)• High efficiency• Rapid response• Small group interventions• Some individualizing
Tier 1/Universal Interventions 80-90%•All students•Preventive, proactive
80-90% Tier 1/Universal Interventions• All settings, all students• Preventive, proactive
School-Wide Systems for Student Success:A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model
Academic Systems Behavioral Systems
Illinois PBIS Network, Revised May 15, 2008. Adapted from “What is school-wide PBS?” OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Accessed at http://pbis.org/schoolwide.htm
Primary Prevention:School-/Classroom-Wide Systems for
All Students,Staff, & Settings
Secondary Prevention:Specialized Group
Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior
Tertiary Prevention:Specialized
IndividualizedSystems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
~80% of Students
~15%
~5%
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
Tier 1/Universal School-Wide Assessment
School-Wide Prevention Systems
SIMEO Tools: HSC-T, RD-T, EI-T
Check-in/ Check-out
Individualized Check-In/Check-Out, Groups & Mentoring (ex. CnC)
Brief Functional Behavioral Assessment/Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP)
Complex FBA/BIP
Wraparound
ODRs, Attendance, Tardies, Grades, DIBELS, etc.
Daily Progress Report (DPR) (Behavior and Academic Goals)
Competing Behavior Pathway, Functional Assessment Interview, Scatter Plots, etc.
Social/Academic Instructional Groups
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports:A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model
Illinois PBIS Network, Revised May 2009Adapted from T. Scott, 2004
Tier 2/Secondary
Tier 3/Tertiary
Inte
rven
tionAssessm
en
t
3-Tiered of System Support
Necessary Conversations (Teams)
CICO
SAIG
Mentoring
ComplexFBA/BIP
Universal Support
Problem Solving Team
Tertiary Systems Team
Brief FBA/BIP
Brief FBA/BIP
UniversalTeam
WRAP
Secondary Systems Team
Plans SW & Class-wide supports
Process data, overall intervention
effectiveness
Standing team, uses FBA/BIP process for
1 youth at a time
Process data, overall intervention
effectiveness
Other Things to Consider…
0School social workers (SSW) struggle with the use of data, pre and post intervention
0Interventions continue to be implemented year after year whether or not success is noted
0SSW and school staff default to individual counseling for many students
0SSW training programs traditionally have not taught the use of data
0Due to lack of resources, SSW have been encouraged to do therapy rather than skill building with students
Reviewing and Changing Job Descriptions (the old way)
0 Completes SDS for Case Study Evaluation0 Integrates Assessment information to provide a multi-faceted
overview of students functional ability0 Participates in Child Study Team0 Conducts classroom observations0 Assists parents and educational personnel in reaching a
realistic understanding of student’s ability and needs0 Provides preventative and therapeutic services to children,
parents, and/or families
Job Description (the old way, cont.)
0Provides services on IEP0Maintains channels of communication with
principals and teachers0Provides assistance in crisis situations0Maintains communication with students, parents,
educational personnel, and community0Provides and participates in in-service0Conducts seminars for parents 0Other duties as assigned.
Newly Designed Job Description
0 Participate in building based activities that support the School Improvement Plan
0 Participate in Secondary and Tertiary intervention planning meetings
0 Participate in development and implementation of strategies and activities related to PBIS
0 Use data to determine effectiveness of research based intervention (pre and post)
0 Use the three tiered approach to intervention planning to enter, progress monitor, and exit youth from interventions (based on data)
0 Providing coaching and professional development for staff
Job Description (New, cont.)
0 Provide conflict resolution training, drug and alcohol education, and social skills training based on secondary or tertiary team
0 Provide direct services to children in crisis0 Provide school social work services to children as determined
in the IEP process based on a continuum of preventative interventions
0 Develop and maintain working relationships with students, parents, educational personnel, and community
0 Participate in the development of Tertiary interventions in the form of FBA/BIP or wraparound teams
Tier 1con·sult
Tier 2co·or·di·nate
Tier 3fa·cil·i·tate
BEFORE
INDIVIDUAL/DIRECT MINUTES WITH STUDENTS
TIME SPENT IN ROLES SUCH AS COORDINATOR, FACILITATOR,
COACH, ETC.
TRANSITION PERIODINDIVIDUAL/DIRECT
MINUTES WITH STUDENTSTIME SPENT IN ROLES SUCH AS COORDINATOR, FACILITATOR,
COACH, ETC.
AFTERINDIVIDUAL/DIRECT
MINUTES WITH STUDENTSTIME SPENT IN ROLES SUCH AS COORDINATOR, FACILITATOR,
COACH, ETC.
Common Trends
0 Moving from reactive to preventative0 Time efficient and least restrictive0 Moving from Tier 1 to leading Tier 2/30 Facilitating Tier 3 Interventions0 Serving students needs vs. “labeled”
populations0 Systems approach0 Intervention vs. Referral to Professional
Charleston County, SC0 45,000 students in 78 schools.0 Over 100 miles from the most distant schools0 Rural, inner city, and suburban schools0 Student Population: 46% African American; 46% Caucasian;
3% Mixed; Asian 2%; 1% Native Amer.; 1% other0 14% Identify themselves as Latin or Hispanic0 60% receive free or reduced meals0 9.5% have IEP’s0 6% not English proficient 0 Historically in CCSD schools; nurses, guidance counselors, a
few contracted mental health counselors, para-professional behavior support staff; school psychologists not school based.
The Evolution of Social Workers in Charleston, SC
0 Social Workers not in CCSD Schools
0 Very limited (2 District-wide) number of social workers in the district office working in the Office of Exceptional Children supporting identified students
From 0 to 60 in one year8 school-based Social Workers are
assigned in 2011-12
0 Federal Counseling Grant0 Charleston Promise Neighborhood 0 Medical University of South Carolina0 Social workers assigned to poor inner city schools
ISF with Social Workers 0 SSW is a new role in CCSD schools0 Integrating with current systems, creating new systems0 Existing Teams – School Leadership
0 PBIS0 TEAM Two0 CORE (Tier 3)
0 External Partners
Use Data to Drive Activities
0 Data that will lead to intervention before referral0 At-Risk Alert System0 SWIS0 Social Emotional Measures
Intervention Vs. Referral0 ARAS (pronounced “air-us”) is the At-Risk Alert System: a data
tool developed by Charleston County School District as part of a federal Safe Schools/Healthy Students grant.
0 Helps identify students potentially at-risk by using existing academic & behavior data.
0 Transforms data into reports to support effective decision making.
0 Provides composite views of magnitudes of risk factors existing for students and schools.
0 Supports a variety of student support models.
Risk Indicators
0ARAS uses student academic and behavior data currently available in PowerSchool and other district data bases as indicators to assess potential risk.
0For each of eight indicators, students are assigned to one of three levels: 0Level 1 (Motivated/Low Risk)0Level 2 (Vulnerable/Moderate Risk)0Level 3 (Critical; High Risk)
Use Data to Monitor Practices
Tier Three
Tier Two
Tier One
Academic
Social Emotion
al
Mental Health
Physical
What Services are Delivered
Professional Physica
l Health
College/Career Preparation
Professional M
ental Health
Basic Needs/R
esources
Family Engagement/Stre
ngthening
Academic Assis
tance
Enrichment/M
otivation
Community Service
Behavior Interventions
Life Skills/
Social Development0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
# of Services
Initially Focus on Tier One Se
ptember
October
Novembe
r
December
January
Febru
ary
March
April
May
June
August
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
# of Level 1 Services by Month
# of Services
PBIS Problem Solving Logic used by CCSD for School-based Social Workers
1. Establish Ground Rules2. Start with Data3. Match Practices to Data4. Align Resources to Implement
Practices
Lewis, PBIS Missouri
Common TrendsFrom Illinois PBIS Network adopted in Charleston, SC
0 Moving from reactive to preventative0 Time efficient and least restrictive0 Moving from Tier 1 to leading Tier 2/30 Facilitating Tier 3 Interventions0 Serving students needs vs. “labeled”
populations0 Systems approach0 Intervention vs. Referral to Professional
What will it take?
To build the collaboration across school employed and community employed partners
0 Knowledge gaps0 Skill gaps0 Relationship gaps
To help school leaders build and sustain collaborative programs
Contact Information
Sheri Luecking, Illinois PBIS [email protected]
Bob Stevens, Ph.D. Charleston, [email protected]