Upload
sanne
View
25
Download
9
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
National Energy Modeling with Implications for a Sustainable Energy Policy. Dr James R. Burns, P.E., CIRM Balaji Janamanchi Texas Tech University Rawls College of Business Administration ISQS area, P.O.Box 42101 Lubbock, Texas 79409-2101 (806)742-1547 Fax-(806)742-3193 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
National Energy Modeling with Implications for a Sustainable Energy
Policy
Dr James R. Burns, P.E., CIRMBalaji Janamanchi
Texas Tech UniversityRawls College of Business Administration
ISQS area, P.O.Box 42101Lubbock, Texas 79409-2101
(806)742-1547 Fax-(806)742-3193Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Outline/Purposes:
• To use Models to Explore various Policies for National Energy Resource Management
• To understand the causes for cycles in energy availability and pricing
• To expose the failures of energy forecasting
• To assert clear implications for policy
Overview Structure of the U.S. Energy System
Coal
U.S. Oil
Foreign Oil
U.S. Natural Gas
Foreign Natural Gas
Uranium
Solar
Electric Utilities
Transportation
Residential/commercial
Industrial
SOURCES CONSUMPTION SECTORS
biofuels
Wind
Consider the U.S. energy sources
• Limited OIL, but abundant nat. gas currently
• Very abundant uranium• Very abundant coal
Coal
U.S. Oil
Foreign Oil
U.S. Natural Gas
Foreign Natural Gas
Uranium
Solar, including Wind
Electric Utilities
Transportation
Residential/commercial
Industrial
SOURCES CONSUMPTION SECTORS
Consider the Transportation sector…
• Energized by Oil mainly• Not coal, not uranium• Not solar/wind
Coal
U.S. Oil
Foreign Oil
U.S. Natural Gas
Foreign Natural Gas
Uranium
Solar, including Wind
Electric Utilities
Transportation
Residential/commercial
Industrial
SOURCES CONSUMPTION SECTORS
Consider the Airlines• Currently, can only run on jet fuel• No ethanol, no natural gas, no
coal, no uranium, no solar or wind power
Coal
U.S. Oil
Foreign Oil
U.S. Natural Gas
Foreign Natural Gas
Uranium
Solar, including Wind
Electric Utilities
Transportation
Residential/commercial
Industrial
SOURCES CONSUMPTION SECTORS
Consider the electric utilities—they can be powered by….
• Oil (U.S. or foreign) (4% of electric utility power)
• Natural gas• Coal• Uranium• Solar/wind• Other nuclear
Coal
U.S. Oil
Foreign Oil
U.S. Natural Gas
Foreign Natural Gas
Uranium
Solar, including Wind
Electric Utilities
Transportation
Residential/commercial
Industrial
SOURCES CONSUMPTION SECTORS
Clear policy implication:
• we should be saving our use of oil for the transportation sector in general and the airlines in particular
• We should not be expending oil to energize the• Electric utilities sector• Residential/commercial sector• Industrial sector
• These sectors have other better energy source choices
Write your Congressman…
• Encourage our legislators to discourage through tax incentives/disincentives the use of oil in all consumption sectors except transportation
How much Oil is left on Planet Earth??
• This is the $64 question• Is Oil a fossil fuel?
Model Baseline Behavior
users
4,0004,0002,000 unit
60,000
000 unit0
1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090Time (Year)
INDUSTRY : energy1"residential-commercial" : energy1transportation : energy1 unitUtilities : energy1
Model Baseline BehaviorEnergy resources
90,0004,0002,000
4 M20,000
80,00000
-4,0000
5 55
5
5 5 5 5
4 44
4
4 4 4 4
3
3
3
3 3 3 3 3
22
2
22 2 2 2 2
1 1 11
1
1
1 1 1
1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090Time (Year)
COAL : energy1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1DOMESTIC OIL : energy1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2NATURAL GAS : energy1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3URANIUM : energy1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4FOREIGN OIL : energy1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Model Structure -- Consumption
• Residential-commercial sector• Industrial sector• Transportation sector• Electric
Model Structure -- Resources• Coal• Natural Gas Sectors• Uranium sector• Oil Sector• Solar Sector, which includes wind
• Sectors that determine the mix of demand among the energy resources
Residential/Commercial Sector
supply-demandratio
effect of supply-demand ratioon residential-commercial
growthlifetime of
residential-commercial
effect of industry onsalvage of
residential-commercial
effect of supply-demand ratioon salvage of
residential-commercial
residential-commercialgrowth normal
initialresidential-commercial
residential-commercial
newresidential-commercial
salvage ofresidential-commercial
effect of trans onresidential-commercial
tab
effect of supply-demandratio on growth of RCD
tab
effect of supply-demandratio on salvage of RCD
tab
effect of industry onsalvage of RCD tab
effect of industry onRCD growth tab
effect of trans onRCD Growth
effect of industry onRCD Growth
<transportation unitsper capita>
<RCD ElectricDemand>
<RCOILD>
<RCDNGD>
<Electric UsageDemand Ratio>
<OIL UsageDemand Ratio>
<NATURAL GASUsage Demand Ratio>
<Industrial Output perCapita Ratio>
Model Structure—Coal and Natural Gas Sectors
COAL
COAL USAGE
Initial COAL
COAL Remaining
COAL UsageDemand Ratio
NATURALGAS
Initial NATURALGAS
NATURAL GASRemaining
NATURAL GASUsage Demand Ratio NATURAL GAS
USAGE
COAL Table
NATURAL GASTable
Natural Gas Supply Sector
Coal Resource Sector
<COALD>
<NGASD>
UNPROVENNATURAL
GAS
GAS DISCOVERYRATE
GAS Discoverytime
<Time>
switch
Model Structure—Oil Sector
DOMESTICOIL
FOREIGNOIL
DOMESTIC OILUSAGE
FOREIGN OILUSAGE
Initial DomesticOIL
Initial Foreign OIL
Domestic OILRemaining
Foreign OILRemaining
Domestic OILRemaining Table Foreign OIL
remaining Table
OIL UsageDemand Ratio
Domestic OILRemaining Multiplier
Foreign OILRemaining Multiplier
<Oil Demand>
UNPROVENDOMESTIC
OIL
UNPROVENFOREIGN OIL
DOM OIL DISRATE
FOR OIL DISRATE
<Time>
oil discovery time
<switch>
Model Structure—Uranium
WASTE FROMLWR
PLUTONIUM
DEPLETED URANIUM
SPENT FUELLWR
PLUTONIUMPRODUCTION RATE
LWR
DEPLETEDURANIUM RATE
LWR
WASTEPRODUCTION
RATE LWR
URANIUM
Initial URANIUM
UraniumRemaining
Uranium RemainingMultiplier
UraniumRemaining Table
SPENT FUEL BR
PLUTONIUMRODUCTION RATE
BR
DEPLETEDURANIUM RATE BR
TAILS PRODUCTIONRATE
WASTE FROMBR
WASTEPRODUCTION
RATE BR
Waste ProductionCoefficient LWR
Plutonium Productioncoefficient LWR
Depleted UraniumProduction coefficient
LWR
Tails to EnrichedRatio LWR
Tails to EnrichedRatio BR
<Uranium RemainingMultiplier>
Waste ProductionCoefficient BR
Depleted UraniumProduction coefficient
BR
Plutonium ProductionCoefficient BR
Uranium UsageLWR
URANIUM USAGERATE LWR
Uraniuim UsageDelay Time LWR
Uranium UsageBR
Uranium UsageDelay time BR
URANIUMUSAGE RATE BR
Maximum DepletedUranium Recycle
Depleted UraniumPlutonium Ratio
MaximumPlutonium Recycle
DEPLETEDURANIUM RECYCLE
RATE
PLUTONIUMRECYCLE RATE
<PLUTONIUMRECYCLE RATE>
<DEPLETEDURANIUM RECYCLE
RATE><TIME STEP>
<Depleted UraniumPlutonium Ratio>
<Maximum DepletedUranium Recycle>
<MaximumPlutonium Recycle>
<TIME STEP> <Maximum DepletedUranium Recycle>
Uranium Light Water and Breeder Reactor Sectors with Tails Production
<UraniumDemand BR>
<UraniumDemand BR>
DUMMYDUMY
<Uranium DemandLWR>
Behavior Assuming Significant HDC Reserves
users
40,00020,00060,000 unit
400,000
000 unit0
1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090Time (Year)
INDUSTRY : energy3"residential-commercial" : energy3transportation : energy3 unitUtilities : energy3
Proven reserves of Oil--Worldwide
AMOUNT(billions of barrels)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Year
AMOUNT(billions of barrels)
Factors Affecting Oil Price
Factors Affecting the Price of Oil
Oil price
Unproven reserves
Proven reserves
Environmentallimitations
Terrorist Fears
Politics
The fallacy of forecasts
• In 1914, U.S. Bureau of Mines predicted U.S. oil reserves would last only ten more years
• In 1939, the U.S. Dept. of the Interior predicted that oil would last only 13 more years, and then in 1951, when the oil shortage never occurred, it predicted oil would run out in just 13 more years
More fallacious forecasts
• In a book published in 1972 entitled Limits to Growth, Dennis and Donnela Meadows claimed that only 550 billion barrels of oil remained in the earth and that they would all be consumed by now
Sasser’s National energy model—wrong as well
RESOURCE/RESERVES
Sasser fore (2003)
Actual (2003)
U.S. Natural gas
All consumed 189 trillion cubic feet
U.S. Oil 167 billion barrels
21.9 billion barrels
U.S. Coal 3.94 trillion tons
.271 trillion tons
Foreign Oil 1800 billion barrels
1244 billion barrels
System Dynamics models of energy• Not a forecasting tool• Enables understanding of the dynamics
• How such dynamical behavior is likely to play out, given certain assumptions is key
• Enables cycles, structures, to be identified
• Enables policy implications to be discerned
Commentary
• Are oil, gas and coal fossil fuels or are they of abiotic origin?
• This is not just a scientific question…
Evidence for abiotic origin
• Oil and gas are being found deep within the Earth’s crust, especially the Russians have been successful at this
• Oil in sedimentary rock contains traces of material from rock below—especially the Devonian and Cambrian rock
More Evidence for abiotic origin
• There seems to be way too much oil to support the hypothesis that it came from decaying biomass that once existed on the surface
• Why did so many dinosaurs and plants decay in the desert of Saudi Arabia?
More Commentary
• If oil and gas are of abiotic origin, then there are huge reserves of oil and gas remaining below the U.S., undiscovered, in granite rock rather than sedimentary, but much further down…
• We just have to drill deeper and in different places to discover them.
• It means our unproven reserves are substantial
Policy implications (Corsi and Smith)• Promote more scientific research to
investigate alternative theories• Fossil fuel theory or abiotic theory
• Expedite leases offshore and in Alaska to encourage oil exploration• If the oil is five miles down, but the ocean is
two miles deep, then you have to drill three miles to get to the oil
• Provide tax credits for deep-drilling oil exploration
More policy implications (Corsi and Smith)• Create an oil research institute to serve
as a clearinghouse of oil industry information
• Develop a public broadcasting television series devoted to the oil industry
• Re-establish a gold-backed international trade dollar
• Establish tax incentives for opening new refineries in the U.S.
Conclusion
• A system dynamics model was developed and presented here that is capable of determining how the energy resource allocations will play out within each sector of the economy
• It is not useful for forecasting• It is useful for finding leverage points
and determining supply/demand cycles
References
• Burns, James R. (1982). Solar Energy and the National energy Dilemma: A Model for Policy Evaluation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 21, 213-228.
• Corsi, Jerome, and Craig R. Smith. (2005). Black Gold Stranglehold: the Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil, WND Books.
• Dyson, Freeman, and Thomas Gold. (1999). The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels, Springer-Verlag, New York.
• Sasser, Dallas W. (1976). A System Dynamics Model of National Energy Usage, Sandia Laboratories Energy Report.
Sources
• [1] SOURCE: http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iea2003/table81.xls
• [1] SOURCE: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/coal.html#Reserves
• [1] The Casini spacecraft soft-landed on Titan in the fall of 2005.• [1] SOURCE:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/gas.html#WorldReserves• [1] SOURCE:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iea2003/table81.xls• [1] SOURCE:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/coal.html#Reserves• [1] SOURCE: National Geographic, Vol. 209, No. 3, pp. 101, March
2006.• [1] SOURCE:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/coal.html#Reserves
Questions??
• Thank you for your interest in this study
Behavior Assuming Significant HDC Reserves
Energy resources
100,0006,0004,000
4 M80,000
000
-8,0000
5 5 5
5
5 5
5
5
4 44
4
44 4 4
33
3
33
3 3 3
22
2
2
2
22 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 11
1
1
1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090Time (Year)
COAL : energy8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1DOMESTIC OIL : energy8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2NATURAL GAS : energy8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3URANIUM : energy8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4FOREIGN OIL : energy8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5