Upload
vuongkhue
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2015 NATIONAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM – LITERACY AND NUMERACY (NAPLAN)
REPORTING GUIDE
YEAR 3, YEAR 5, YEAR 7 AND YEAR 9
© 2015
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide ii
Published by the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
Level 1, 2 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3000
First published 2015
© Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority 2015
All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this
publication may be reproduced by any process without permission in writing from the publishers.
Copying: Victorian schools may print or photocopy parts of this publication for use by teachers.
ISBN 978-1-922082-97-8
iiiNAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
CONTACT DETAILS
Freecall 1800 648 637
Fax (03) 9225 2334
Email [email protected]
VCAA website www.vcaa.vic.edu.au
DATES FOR NAPLAN 2016 TESTS
10 May Literacy (Language Conventions, Writing)
11 May Literacy (Reading)
12 May Numeracy
VCAA NAPLAN Helpdesk
A Helpdesk service operates to assist principals and NAPLAN coordinators with queries about NAPLAN. For queries and/or assistance contact the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA) on:
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide iv
ContentsVCAA NAPLAN Helpdesk iiiDATES FOR NAPLAN 2016 TESTS iiiIntroduction 1
Privacy Policy 1
NAPLAN Data Service 2 Reporting arrangements in 2015 2Reports on a National Scale 2Important information regarding the reporting of the Writing domain 3Scaled Scores 3National Minimum Standards 3Trend Data and Growth 4NAPLAN Student Report Format 4Release of Data 4Reference Guides for analysing NAPLAN data 4
Section 1: NAPLAN Data Service Access 5Changing the password 6Accessing a report 7Selection criteria 8Assign Students to Classes function 8Previewing and printing reports 9Extract function 10
Section 2: NAPLAN Data Service Reports 11Summary of reports available 11List of Reports and Functions 11School Summary Report 13Group Summary Report 14Assessment Area Report 15Writing Criteria Report 16 Item Analysis Report 17Student Response Report 18Student Achievement Level Report 20Five Year Trend Report 22School Comparison Report – Matched School Group 23 Scaled Score summary table 25School-Student Comparison Report 25Relative Growth Report 27
Section 3: Interpretation of Results 29Making Comparisons 29School and Subgroup Comparisons 29Individual Comparisons and Improvement 30
Section 4: NAPLAN Student Reports 31Sample page 1 of the NAPLAN Student Report 32NAPLAN Data Service Reports 33Confidentiality of Results 33Distribution of NAPLAN Student Reports 33Replacement of NAPLAN Student Reports 33Queries about NAPLAN Student Reports 33
Appendix 1: NAPLAN 2015 Question Details 34Year 3 Reading 34Year 5 Reading 36Year 7 Reading 38Year 9 Reading 41Year 3 Language Conventions 44Year 5 Language Conventions 46Year 7 Language Conventions 48Year 9 Language Conventions 51Year 3 Numeracy 54Year 5 Numeracy 56Year 7 Numeracy (Non-Calculator) 58Year 7 Numeracy (Calculator) 60Year 9 Numeracy (Non-Calculator) 62Year 9 Numeracy (Calculator) 64
Appendix 2: NAPLAN 2015 Data Service Report Summary 66Glossary 71Data presentation 71
1NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
IntroductionThe National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) conducted in May 2015, assessed Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 students across the nation in literacy and numeracy.
All tests were constructed by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), in consultation with all states and territories. For the literacy assessment, Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 students completed three tests consisting of a Reading test, a Writing test and a Language Conventions test. For numeracy, Years 3 and 5 students completed one Numeracy test for which a calculator was not permitted. Years 7 and 9 students completed two Numeracy tests, the first of which permitted the use of a calculator.
The Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority (VCAA) provides reports on individual student results and school data to all Victorian schools through the secure web-based NAPLAN Data Service.
Privacy Policy
The Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA) is committed to the protection of student information generated by NAPLAN. All personal information collected during NAPLAN is used in accordance with the Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014.
In order to conduct the NAPLAN tests, the VCAA collects names and achievement data of all students who undertake the Year 3, Year 5, Year 7 and Year 9 tests. The VCAA also collects information on student gender, language background, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) status, Victorian Student Number (VSN) and date of birth.
The VCAA supports schools’ privacy compliance with NAPLAN testing requirements by encouraging principals to ensure that their parent communities are aware of the purposes for which NAPLAN data will be used.
The VCAA uses the student information provided by schools to pre-print individual student details on the front cover of the test books and to report to parents on their child’s performance. This data is also provided to the school to assist principals to analyse the effectiveness of their school programs and to identify individual student’s strengths and weaknesses.
Schools across Australia are required to collect background characteristic information for all students participating in NAPLAN. The VCAA, on behalf of the Department of Education and Training (DET), is responsible for the management and supply of this information for national reporting purposes.
The information required for each student is as follows:
• parental school education (mother and father as applicable)
• parental non-school education (mother and father as applicable)
• main language spoken at home (student)
• main language spoken at home (mother and father as applicable)
• parental occupation
• country of birth.
No individual student will be identifiable in the information for release for national reporting purposes.
The principal will ensure that all student details and results are confidential.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 2
NAPLAN Data ServiceThe Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 NAPLAN data is available for Victorian schools to access online, via the secure NAPLAN Data Service. All student and school results from 2008 to 2015 can be accessed by schools on this website. Schools must use their unique login and security password to access their results.
Reporting arrangements in 2015
Earlier release of NAPLAN data to schools Following the successful early release of some NAPLAN data in 2014, the VCAA has again been able to work with ACARA to implement even more timely reporting in 2015.
It is anticipated that all NAPLAN data service reports will be available for school use in the week commencing 17 August, 2015.
Access to NAPLAN Writing Test images In 2015, for the first time, the VCAA will provide schools with access to images of their students’ NAPLAN Writing Tests. We believe this will assist schools with interpretation of their NAPLAN writing results and inform classroom teaching and learning programs.
The images will be available via the NAPLAN Test Administration website. Access will be limited to a period of 3 – 4 weeks. It is anticipated this period will be from mid-August to the end of Term 3.
Details of how to access the website and download images will have been sent to school principals with school reporting packages.
Please note that schools will have access only to images of the Writing Tests of their own students, and that the images are available strictly for internal school use.
Reports on a National Scale
The National Assessment Program scale maps student outcomes onto a ten band continuum. Where appropriate, the NAPLAN Data Service displays results against these bands. National, state and school distributions are presented as box-and-whisker graphs plotted against the bands relevant for the year level as follows:
• Year 3 - results will be reported in Band 1 to Band 6
• Year 5 - results will be reported in Band 3 to Band 8
• Year 7 - results will be reported in Band 4 to Band 9
• Year 9 - results will be reported in Band 5 to Band 10.
3NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Important information regarding the reporting of the Writing domain
Prior to 2011, students were required to produce a narrative piece of writing for the NAPLAN Writing test, and outcomes for these tests in 2008, 2009 and 2010 are all reported on the same scale, and are directly comparable. When the genre was changed to persuasive writing in 2011, analysis by ACARA showed that students performed differently on tasks requiring these two different types of writing, and that it was not possible to report persuasive and narrative writing outcomes on the same scale.
For 2015, students were again asked to produce a persuasive piece of writing, and results for this test are reported on the persuasive scale established in 2011. Comparisons between 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 writing outcomes may therefore be meaningfully made, but schools are advised not to make such direct comparisons back to narrative results from 2008, 2009 or 2010.
Scaled Scores
Scaled scores provide an ability measure of student outcomes. These scores range from 0 to 1000, and form the numeric continuum from which the ten reporting bands are derived. The bands line up against the scaled scores as follows:
• Band 1 - scaled scores ≤ 270 • Band 6 - scaled scores > 478 and ≤ 530• Band 2 - scaled scores > 270 and ≤ 322 • Band 7 - scaled scores > 530 and ≤ 582• Band 3 - scaled scores > 322 and ≤ 374 • Band 8 - scaled scores > 582 and ≤ 634• Band 4 - scaled scores > 374 and ≤ 426 • Band 9 - scaled scores > 634 and ≤ 686• Band 5 - scaled scores > 426 and ≤ 478 • Band 10 - scaled scores > 686
National, state and school summary statistics are provided as scaled scores below the box-and-whisker graphs for the School Summary (National) Report. The tabular form of the Student Achievement Level (National) Report shows results for individual students as a scaled score for each assessment area.
Scaled scores can be directly compared across time within any given assessment area. However, comparison of scaled scores across different assessment areas is not meaningful and is not recommended.
National Minimum Standards With the introduction of NAPLAN in 2008, single point national benchmarks were replaced with a national minimum standard, defined by a particular band at each year level as follows:
• For Year 3, the national minimum standard is Band 2• For Year 5, the national minimum standard is Band 4• For Year 7, the national minimum standard is Band 5• For Year 9, the national minimum standard is Band 6.
Students with results in these bands have typically demonstrated the basic elements of literacy and numeracy for their year level. Students with results in the lowest band for their year level have not achieved the National Minimum Standard, and are likely to require focused intervention or specialised support to fully participate in schooling.
Details of the general skills associated with the National Minimum Standards are provided, for each domain, on the ACARA website at http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/about-each-domain/about-each-domain.html.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 4
Trend Data and Growth
The Five Year Trend Report displays a full five year data set, and provides schools with an opportunity to make comparisons between their NAPLAN results over the five years from 2011 – 2015.
Three further reports are available which help establish growth patterns.
The School Comparison Report shows the distribution of results for Year 3, (5 or 7) students in 2013, and that for the same students in Year 5 (7 or 9) in 2015.
The Student-School Comparison Report shows the relative position of 2013 and 2015 results for a selected student, with respect to national, state and, where applicable, school results.
The Relative Growth Report shows the level of growth for each student relative to students who had the same NAPLAN score two years ago.
More detailed information about these reports is provided in Section 2.
NAPLAN Student Report format
The format of the NAPLAN Student Reports is similar for all states and territories. A sample NAPLAN Student Report for 2015 is provided on page 32.
Release of data
It is likely that some national data will not be available at the time of the Data Service release. In these cases, national results will be withheld and a note will appear indicating that additional data will be provided when available.
Reference Guides for analysing NAPLAN data The VCAA has developed a guide to assist school staff in analysing their student’s NAPLAN results. This guide includes information about the NAPLAN scale, and, for government schools, how to analyse the NAPLAN results included in the School Level Reports. The NAPLAN Reference Guide - Analysing NAPLAN Data is available on the VCAA website at: http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/naplan/analysingnaplandata.pdf
Some examples of the ways in which NAPLAN data can be used at the classroom level can be found in the Teacher’s Guide to using NAPLAN data diagnostically at: https://naplands.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Tutorial/WebHelp/Guides/teachersguide-usingnaplandata.pdf
Additionally, a reference guide outlining the structure and function of the new Relative Growth Report is available at: http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/naplan/GuidetoRelativeGrowthReport.pdf
5NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Section 1: NAPLAN Data Service Access
The NAPLAN 2015 student results and school data are available on the secure NAPLAN Data Service website. Principals should ensure that all personnel who are given access to their school’s data treat that information in a confidential manner.
To access this website, go to: https://naplands.vcaa.vic.edu.au
This screen will appear:
Click on ‘NAPLAN Data Service System Login’.
You will see the login screen.
Enter the school identification login name (User ID) and password, then left click on the ‘Login’ button. Passwords are case sensitive.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 6
This screen will appear:
Note: When a school logs on to the NAPLAN Data Service, the test frame on the ‘Reports Parameters‘ screen will be customised to the year level and type of tests completed by students at that school. The screen will vary depending on the tests attempted by students in that school in the period from 2008 to 2015.
The drop-down menu options will also match the testing history of the school.
For 2015, the ‘Reporting Years’ menu can offer NAPLAN results for 2008 to 2015. The ‘Report Name’ menu will contain reports relevant to the year level and reporting year for your school. Check the table ‘NAPLAN 2015 Data Service Report Summary’ on page 66 to see which reports relate to the NAPLAN 2015 tests.
Please note: To ensure data security, school passwords are changed annually. Passwords for 2015 are supplied in the letter to principals which accompanies the delivery of NAPLAN student reports. If a password is lost, the principal should send an email to: <[email protected]>. Please include ‘Password Request’ in the subject line.
Changing the password
The school identification login (User ID) is a permanent name which has been programmed for the school and cannot be changed. The password may be changed by accessing the ‘Change Password’ option at the top right of the initial ‘NAPLAN Reports Parameters’ screen.
Note: A password must consist of a minimum of six characters (no spaces), and must include at least one letter and one number. Passwords are case sensitive.
7NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Accessing a report
Log into the NAPLAN Data Service and from the ‘Report Parameters’ screen:
1. Select the required year level in the ‘Test’ frame2. Select 2015 from the ‘Reporting Year’ drop-down menu3. Select the report required from the ‘Report Name’ drop-down menu.
When a report is selected, additional parameters will be displayed, as shown below for the Group Summary Report.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 8
Selection criteria
The selection criteria are the additional options that are available once the Report Name has been selected. The available options will vary for each specific report. Selection criteria may include:
• Group selection
This allows reporting on students by gender, Language Background Other Than English (LBOTE) and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) status.
• Class selection
Reporting on a class can be generated by selecting a class from the ‘Class Code’ drop-down menu on the ‘Report Parameters’ screen. See below for details on how to assign students to classes.
• Student selection
Some reports allow reporting on all students or, by selecting the required name from the ‘Student Name’ drop-down menu, one specific student.
Assign Students to Classes function
For 2015 reports, this function can be accessed from all reports except the School Summary Report, the Five Year Trend Report, the School Comparison Report and the School-Student Comparison Report.
The ‘Assign Students to Classes’ function allows the creation of classes and the assigning of students to those classes.
Click on the ‘Assign Students to Classes’ button. This takes you to the ‘Assign Students to Classes’ screen.
A list of the names of the selected group of students will appear on the screen with a ‘Class’ drop-down menu available against each student name.
9NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
If schools provided class information to the VCAA during the enrolment phase, this information will be included in the NAPLAN Data Service next to student names.
Classes can be created using the ‘Create/Delete Classes’ button on the top right hand side of the ‘Assign Students to Classes’ screen. This will open the ‘Create/Delete Classes’ window.
A class can be deleted at any time by clicking the ‘Delete’ column next to the class name.
To create a new class, select the Reporting Test required and enter the new class code in the available field, then click on the Save button. Please note that class names can only consist of three alphanumeric characters, e.g. 9DK.
After the required class or classes are created, close this window by clicking on the ‘Close’ link at the top right of this window. You will be returned to the ‘Assign Students to Classes’ screen where the new class will appear in the ‘Class’ drop-down menu next to the student name.
Note: Students do not have to be assigned to a class unless a report is needed for that particular group of students.
Previewing and printing reports
When the required report has been chosen and the appropriate criteria selected for the report, click on the ‘Preview Report’ button located on the bottom left of the screen. This will display the report on the screen.
The following functions are available at the top right of the preview report screen:
Preview All Pages I Print I Export I Close
‘Preview All Pages’ enables you to view all the pages of a longer report on a single screen.
‘Print’ enables you to print out part or all of a report. Check your print page layout before printing the reports. The Student Achievement Level Report, the Group Summary Report and the Writing Summary Report are best printed in portrait layout while all the other reports should be printed in landscape.
‘PDF’ enables the report to be exported to PDF format to allow for storage or printing.
‘Export’ enables you to send the report to MS Word where you can store it or place it in another Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel document. ‘Export to Microsoft Word’ will only work with versions of Microsoft Word 2002 or later.
‘Close’ closes the ‘Preview Reports’ screen.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 10
Extract function
The NAPLAN Data Service has an extract function that enables schools to extract report data in a tabular format. The selected data is extracted into a comma separated values (CSV) file format that can either be saved as an MS Excel document or imported into MS Access for further analysis and charting.
Schools are able to extract data at both the school level and student level, and can also extract national and state means and percentiles for outcome scores.
The extract function can be accessed through the ‘Extract’ link located at the top of the initial ‘Report Parameters’ screen.
The ‘Extract’ screen is shown below. Instructions on how to run the extract function can be found in the ‘Help’ link located at the top of the screen.
11NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Section 2: NAPLAN Data Service Reports The NAPLAN Data Service provides eleven reports covering current year results from NAPLAN testing against the national scale.
Summary of reports available
The following table provides a summary of all NAPLAN Data Service reports, and indicates the year levels for which they are available.
Report Name Year 3 Year 5 Year 7 Year 9
School Summary Report 4 4 4 4
Group Summary Report 4 4 4 4
Assessment Area Report 4 4 4 4
Writing Criteria Report 4 4 4 4
Item Analysis Report 4 4 4 4
Student Response Report 4 4 4 4
Student Achievement Level Report 4 4 4 4
Five Year Trend Report 4 4 4 4
School Comparison Report 4 u 4
School-Student Comparison Report 4 u 4
Relative Growth Report u u u
4 Report is available for NAPLAN results for 2008 to 2015
u Report is available for NAPLAN results from 2012
List of reports and functions
For 2015, the NAPLAN ‘Report Name’ menu has the following report options:
• School Summary Report – displays national, state and school distribution data for each test area (Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy). This report presents data displayed against the National Assessment Program Scale. It shows a graphic displaying data in box-and-whisker plots and a table of summary statistics (see page 13).
• Group Summary Report – compares all students and subgroups of students at the school with the same groups for the nation and state (see page 14).
• Assessment Area Report – summarises results for groups of students by test area or dimension and shows where school results vary significantly from the state (see page 15).
• Writing Criteria Report – summarises group performances on the Writing test for each of the ten criteria against which the national Writing test was assessed (see page 16).
• Item Analysis Report – provides distractor analysis, including percentages correct, for each Reading, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy item. It also displays data for the National, State and Group cohorts and includes a description of the skill assessed against each item. This report is available in both tabular and graphical format (see page 17).
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 12
• Student Response Report – provides detailed information on results for either one student or for a group of students (see page 18).
• Student Achievement Level Report – provides summary information on results for either one student or for a group of students. This report can be printed in graphic and tabular formats. This data is displayed against the National Assessment Program Scale (see page 20).
• Five Year Trend Report – presents national, state and school data from 2011 to 2015 as box-and-whisker plots on the national scale. These are provided separately for each test area (Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation and Numeracy). In addition, national, state and school scaled score means are plotted on a line graph over the five year period of comparison (see page 22).
• School Comparison Report – compares results of students at the school who undertook the Year 5 (7 or 9) tests in 2015 with their results, if available, for the tests they undertook in Year 3 (5 or 7) in 2013. National, state and (where applicable) school results are also shown for each of the two testing periods (see page 23).
• School–Student Comparison Report – shows, for an individual student, Year 3 (5 or 7) results from 2013 and Year 5 (7 or 9) results from 2015 with respect to the distribution of national, state and (where applicable) school outcomes (see page 25).
• Relative Growth Report – this report shows the level of growth for each student relative to similar ability students. Each student’s level of relative growth is determined by comparing their result to results of Victorian students who had the same NAPLAN score two years ago. The tabular version of the report shows the scaled score outcomes and relative growth category (‘high’, ‘medium’ or ‘low’) for each student at the school that participated in NAPLAN assessment. The graphical version of the report provides a summary of these relative growth levels, and also displays them with respect to achievement levels from two years prior (see page 27). Note: this report is available for Year 5, Year 7 and Year 9.
13NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
School Summary Report
This report provides data on groups of students who completed the Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 NAPLAN tests and reports on Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy. The School Summary Report displays the national, state and school distribution data for each test area on the National Assessment Program scale (National Band results).
The report can be viewed for all students or by subgroup (Girls, Boys, LBOTE and ATSI) and provides a graphic displaying data in box-and-whisker plots. A table showing summary statistics is included below the graphs. For the National Report, these statistics are given as scaled scores.
Example of School Summary Report
Note: Where there are fewer than ten students in the selected group, the box-and-whisker presentation is replaced by a series of dots. Each dot represents a specific student, except when there are students who receive the same result.
These graphs show the distribution of national, state and school results on the (ten band) National scale.
This table provides the scaled score summary statistics at national, state and school levels.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 14
Group Summary Report
This report graphically displays the national, state and school distribution data separately for each test area (Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy), broken down by subgroup (All Students, Boys, Girls, LBOTE and ATSI). In addition, a summary table for each test area shows the number of students from the school, by subgroup, who obtain results in each achievement level.
Reports on the National Assessment Program scale show the percentage of students who have results ABOVE, AT and BELOW the National Minimum Standard. These percentages do not include students who were absent from the test.
Note: Where there are fewer than ten students in the selected group, the box-and-whisker presentation is replaced by a series of dots. Each dot represents a specific student, except when there are students who receive the same result.
Example of Group Summary Report
These graphs show the distribution of national, state and school results for All Students, Boys, Girls, LBOTE and ATSI students respectively.
When a school group has fewer than ten students, the results are reported as a dot per student (may be superimposed for identical scores).
15NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Assessment Area Report
The Assessment Area Report groups data by assessment area or dimension, and displays the total percentage of correct responses to items within each assessment area.
Assessment areas reported in Literacy are Reading, Grammar and Punctuation, and Spelling.
Assessment areas reported in Numeracy are Number, Measurement, chance and data, Space and Structure. Structure is equivalent to the Algebra, function and pattern strand in the NAPLAN tests.
The data is displayed as a horizontal bar chart which shows the percentage correct for the school and the state. The report also highlights any area where there is a significant difference between the percentage correct for the school and that for the state. Care should be taken when analysing the results for small groups (see page 29 for further information about interpreting results).
Example of Assessment Area Report
This section lists those areas where the school varied significantly from the state (if applicable).
This figure shows the number of items assessed that contribute to this report.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 16
Writing Criteria Report
The Writing Criteria Report shows the frequency of scores for each of the ten criteria against which the Writing test was assessed. This report shows bar graphs for national, state and school data.
Students were asked to write a persuasive text based on a common stimulus and given time to plan, write and edit their work.
In 2015 following extensive consultation it was agreed that years 3 and 5 students receive a different topic from years 7 and 9.
3 and 5 stimulus was “Try this activity”. 7 and 9 stimulus was “Simply the best”.
Student writing was assessed against the following ten criteria:
Criterion Description Score range
Audience The writer’s capacity to orient, engage and persuade the reader 0 – 6
Text structure The organisation of the structural components of a persuasive text (introduction, body and conclusion) into an appropriate and effective text structure
0 – 4
Ideas The selection, relevance and elaboration of ideas for a persuasive argument 0 – 5
Persuasive devices
The use of a range of persuasive devices to enhance the writer’s position and persuade the reader
0 – 4
Vocabulary The range and precision of contextually appropriate language choices 0 – 5
Cohesion The control of multiple threads and relationships across the text, achieved through the use of referring words, ellipsis, text connections, substitutions and word associations
0 – 4
Paragraphing The segmenting of text into paragraphs that assists the reader to follow the line of argument
0 – 3
Sentence structure
The production of grammatically correct, structurally sound and meaningful sentences
0 – 6
Punctuation The use of correct and appropriate punctuation to aid the reading of the text 0 – 5
Spelling The accuracy of spelling and the difficulty of the words used 0 – 6
Links are provided at the top of the report to both the 2015 Writing Stimulus and the 2015 Marking Guide.
Example of Writing Criteria Report
Click on the links to view the 2015 Writing Stimulus and Marking Guide.
The graphs show the percentage of results for each score.
17NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Item Analysis Report
The tabular version of the Item Analysis Report provides summary information about items in Reading, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy. All reports are available by item order or by difficulty order. In addition, Numeracy reports can be run by dimension order. For Years 7 and 9, the Numeracy reports are available either for the calculator and non-calculator tests separately, or as a combined report.
This report provides item distractor analysis information, including the percentage correct for each question for the national, state and school cohorts, and a description of the skill assessed for each item. For multiple choice questions, the percentage for each item response is also given.
A link is provided from each item number (in column 1) to the test item in the relevant NAPLAN 2015 test paper. A document providing summary information about the test can be accessed via a link above the table in the report.
Example of Item Analysis Report - tabular format
Each item number is a link to the test question.
This link displays a summary document for this test.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 18
A graphical version of the Item Analysis Report is available to complement the tabular report. This report enables item level data for each test to be viewed as a column graph, displaying the percentage of students in the school or selected group who responded correctly to each question. It also provides a comparison to the corresponding state and national percentages.
Example of Item Analysis Report - graphical format
Student Response Report
This report is a concise summary of each student’s performance. It shows the student’s total score and items answered correctly. The incorrect item responses are given where possible for Reading, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy. For Writing, the student’s score for each criterion and the total score is displayed.
The report can be printed for individuals or groups of students. An individual student’s report can also be provided to parents if they require further information about their child’s results.
All reports are available by item order or by difficulty order. In addition, Numeracy reports are available by dimension order. For Years 7 and 9, the non-calculator and calculator reports are provided separately. A combined report displays only the total correct for each of the two tests and a combined total score.
The column graph shows the percentage of students at the school who correctly responded to each test question.
The national and state percentage correct are indicated by the black and yellow lines.
19NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Example of Student Response Report
Note: Letters denote an incorrect response. For example - A, B, C, D and E relate to the first, second, third, fourth or fifth multiple-choice options in a question.
A summary is provided at the end of each report that displays:
• the percentage of correct responses for each item for the Group and for the State, and
• the Group and State median, mean and standard deviation.
Shows the total number of correct items for each student.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 20
Student Achievement Level Report
The Student Achievement Level Report provides individual student results for each test outcome where a result is available.
The report shows the performance of individual students in the school in each area assessed. This report can be printed for all students in a group or for an individual student.
Student Achievement Level Report - graphical format
This report reflects the information contained in the NAPLAN Student Report. It displays the student’s Achievement Score for each assessment area in relation to the national mean and the middle 60% of national results. The dots indicate the student’s results for each assessment area.
Example of Student Achievement Level Report
The shaded areas show the national range of achievement for the middle 60% of students for the year level.
21NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Student Achievement Level Report - tabular format
The tabular form of this report gives the Scaled Score outcome for each student in the group, and for each test for which a result is available.
Reports student achievement in scaled scores.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 22
Five Year Trend Report
This report provides trend data on groups of students who have completed the NAPLAN tests.
The report shows summary results in the form of box-and-whisker graphs for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 in the areas of Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy. Results are given for the national, state and school groups. The report can be run for the whole group (All), or by Gender, LBOTE or ATSI status.
In addition, a line graph is provided showing the national, state and school mean scaled scores plotted over time. These means are also displayed numerically in a table at the end of the report.
This graph plots the mean of the selected outcome for the national, state and school group for each year of NAPLAN.
This table displays the means as a scaled score and includes a count of students in the school group.
These graphs show the national, state and school distribution of results for the selected outcome for each year of NAPLAN.
23NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
School Comparison Report – Matched School Group
This report provides data on groups of students who completed Year 5, Year 7 or Year 9 tests and reports on Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy.
This report shows the growth between 2013 and 2015 results for students who undertook the 2013 and 2015 tests at the same school. This version of the report is not available for Year 7 students at secondary schools (where there is no Year 5 cohort). The report shows data at the national and state levels, as well as that for
• the school group (all students in the school at the time of testing)
• the matched school group (only students who were present at the school for both the 2013 and the 2015 tests)
These data are longitudinal in nature and are useful for comparing the change in performance of the same groups of students between 2013 and 2015 (e.g. how the performance of Year 3 students in 2013 compares to their performance now they are in Year 5 in 2015). Alternatively, these data are useful for investigating the rate of progress of a group of students over time, relative to other students in the nation and state.
Example of Year 5 School Comparison Report – Matched School Group
For each set of results:
- The first (blue) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all Australian students in the relevant year. (National)
- The second (yellow) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all Victorian students in the relevant year. (State)
- The third (red) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all students who completed the test at the school in the relevant year. (School)
- The fourth (green) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for those students who completed both the 2013 and 2015 tests at the school. (Matched School Group)
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 24
School Comparison Report – Matched School Group The Matched Student Group version of the School Comparison Report is available for all schools with a Year 7 cohort. P-12 schools can also see this version of the report for Year 5 and Year 9 students. This report is similar to the Matched School Group version described above, but contains the following adjustments:
• There is no ‘School’ group (red) for 2013
• The ‘Matched School’ group (green) is replaced by a ‘Matched Student’ group (orange). This is the group of students who sat the 2015 test at the school and who have a 2013 result from this or another school.
Example of Year 7 School Comparison Report
For each set of results:
- The first (blue) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all Australian students in the relevant year. (National)
- The second (yellow) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all Victorian students in the relevant year. (State)
- The third (red) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all students who completed the 2015 test at the school. (School – current year only)
- The fourth (orange) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for those students who completed the 2015 tests at the school, and who have a 2013 result from this or another school. (Matched Student Group)
25NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
School-Student Comparison Report
This report provides data on individual students who completed Year 5, Year 7 or Year 9 tests and reports on Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation, and Numeracy.
For Year 5 and Year 9, this report shows the achievement levels for an individual student in 2013 and 2015, with respect to the corresponding national, state and school data for those years. The school data provided represents the complete school group (all students at the school at the time of testing).
A School-Student Comparison Report is available for Year 5 to Year 7. For schools that have both Year 5 and Year 7 enrolments, it follows the same format as that described above for Year 5 and Year 9 students. For other secondary schools, the report is the same except that the 2013 Year 5 ‘School’ distributions cannot be provided, and hence the (red) box-and-whiskers for 2013 Year 5 are not shown on the graph for these schools.
These data are useful for determining the change in a student’s performance between 2013 and 2015 (e.g. how the student’s Year 7 performance in 2013 compares to their performance in Year 9 in 2015). These data are also useful for determining a student’s rate of progress over time relative to other students in the national, state or school groups.
Scaled Score summary table
The scaled score summary table (formerly found at the top of the Student Comparison Report) has been appended to the School Comparison Report, so that schools are still able to view the average scaled score differences between testing periods for national, state, school and (where applicable) matched school or matched student groups.
Example of Scaled Score summary table showing Year 3 to Year 5 comparisons
Note: In the Year 7 report for schools with no Year 5 cohort, no 2013 Year 5 ‘School Mean’ is given, and the statistics for the ‘Matched School’ group are replaced with those for the ‘Matched Student’ group.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 26
Example of Year 9 School–Student Comparison Report
For each set of results:
- The first (blue) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all Australian students in the relevant year. (National)
- The second (yellow) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all Victorian students in the relevant year. (State)
- The third (red) box-and-whisker shows the distribution of results for all students who completed the test at the school in the relevant year. (School)
Note: The 2013 Year 5 ‘School’ distribution is not provided for Year 7 students, unless there were Year 5 students enrolled at the school in 2013.
These dots show the result for the nominated student for the tests in Year 7 and Year 9 respectively.
27NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Relative Growth Report
The Relative Growth Report shows the level of growth for each student relative to similar ability students and enables schools to make more informed judgements about a student’s progress between testing periods.
Each student’s level of relative growth is determined by comparing their result to results of Victorian students that had the same NAPLAN score two years ago. If, compared to the current year scores for this group of ‘similar’ students, the student’s current year NAPLAN score is in the:
• highest 25%, their growth is categorised as ‘High’ (Green),
• middle 50%, their growth is categorised as ‘Medium’ (Yellow),
• lowest 25%, their growth is categorised as ‘Low’ (Red).
The tabular version of the report shows the scaled score outcomes and relative growth category (high, medium or low) for each student at the school that participated in NAPLAN assessment.
The report may be ordered by students’ prior or current scores, or by student name, and may be viewed at a class or school level.
A link is provided at the top of the report to a document containing further details about this report and some examples of how it may be used and interpreted.
Example of Year 7 Relative Growth Report - tabular format
Link to Reference document
For a given student, ‘similar students’ are those Victorian students that had the same NAPLAN score in 2013.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 28
The graphical version of the report provides a summary of these relative growth levels, and also displays them with respect to achievement levels from two years prior.
Example of Year 7 Relative Growth Report - graphical format
29NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Section 3: Interpretation of ResultsAll reports in the NAPLAN Data Service are provided using the National Assessment Program scale.
NAPLAN results between 2008 and 2015 are based on the scaled scores which form the numeric continuum from which the ten national reporting bands are derived. (See page 3 for further information on scaled scores and national reporting bands.) Reports showing national, state, school or subgroup distributions are generally presented as box-and-whisker graphs and referenced to the national reporting bands. The underlying summary statistics which generate these graphs are displayed, where appropriate, as scaled scores.
Scaled scores can be directly compared across time within any given assessment area. However, comparison of scaled scores across different assessment areas is not meaningful and is not recommended.
The national data used in the NAPLAN Data Service has been drawn from a large, scientifically constructed sample of results from across Australia. Graphs and tables for state data use results from the full Victorian testing cohorts of over 61,000 students at each of Years 3, 5, 7 and 9, spread across approximately 2,300 primary and secondary schools.
Making comparisons
A number of factors should be taken into account when making comparisons using school, subgroup or individual student data. In particular, schools should consider:
• the size of the group
• the size of the difference between groups.
School and subgroup comparisons
Group level achievement data is more stable and more reliable when it is based on large groups. In general, the larger the group, the more reliably representative the data will be. For example, the national and state data presented in the Data Service has been based on very large numbers of students and will accurately reflect general achievement across Australia and Victoria respectively. With the exception of very small schools, school level data is also generally reliable, and meaningful comparisons may be made between the school performances and those of the state or the nation.
For schools with very small student numbers, care must be taken when making such comparisons as the difference may simply reflect the normal variation that occurs whenever student performance is measured. Similarly, in drawing conclusions about subgroup or class differences, consideration must be given to the size of the group. Group level results for a group with fewer than ten students cannot be used to provide accurate or meaningful comparisons.
The data for a complete Five Year Trend Data Report has been supplied, allowing schools to compare results for 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
As with school or subgroup comparisons made within a testing year, the validity of comparisons made over time will depend on both the size of the group and the size of the observed differences between groups.
If observed differences between groups are large, schools can be confident that they reflect a true disparity. Small differences may occur just by chance, especially when the groups are relatively small. Even for large groups, very small differences are unlikely to be of great practical significance, unless they form a consistent pattern over time.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 30
Individual comparisons and improvement
NAPLAN consists of a number of single point-in-time tests designed to complement and confirm other classroom assessments, and should generally provide a very good indication of student ability at an individual level. However, occasional anomalies will occur, and if the test results for an individual student vary considerably from teacher expectations, teachers are encouraged to investigate the performance more closely. It is possible, for example, that the student was unwell on the day of the test and did not perform to the best of his or her ability.
For students in Year 5, Year 7 or Year 9 in 2015 it is possible to compare current NAPLAN results with those from Year 3, Year 5 or Year 7 in 2013. This can be done either by:
• looking at the results for a selected student in any test area (Reading, Writing, Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation or Numeracy) with respect to national, state and school outcomes, and noting any shift in relative performance. (School-Student Comparison Report)
• comparing the relative growth from 2013 to 2015 for a selected student in any test area and noting whether this is classified as ‘high’, ‘medium’ or ‘low’ with respect to gains made by similar students. (Relative Growth Report).
Both the relative position of a student’s outcome with respect to national, state or school results, and his or her relative growth categorisation, enable schools to make more informed judgements about the student’s progress than can be achieved by just looking at the scaled score differences between testing periods. This is because scaled score differences vary greatly depending on the student’s starting point from two years prior. It must still be remembered however, that individual results are subject to a greater degree of variation than those for larger groups of students, and that, as noted above, anomalies at the individual level will occasionally occur.
31NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Section 4: NAPLAN Student ReportsA NAPLAN Student Report is provided for the parents for each student who undertook the Years 3, 5, 7 or 9 tests.
The format of the NAPLAN Student Reports is the same for all states and territories and has been set nationally for reporting student achievement results to parents for NAPLAN in 2015.
Each NAPLAN Student Report will include:
• student and school details
• information about the NAPLAN tests
• a ‘How to read the student report’ section
• a pictorial example
• individual student’s achievement results for Reading, Writing, Language Conventions (Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation) and Numeracy on the National Assessment Program scale
• an indicator for each assessment area that shows the national average and the middle 60% of national results
• a written description for each assessment area identifying the types of skills assessed
• a ‘Summary of Skills and Understandings Assessed’ table describing what students are likely to demonstrate in each of the bands.
33NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
NAPLAN Data Service Reports
The NAPLAN Data Service Reports can be used to supplement information in the NAPLAN Student Reports. Teachers are advised to become familiar with the content of the reports so they can answer parents’ questions about particular aspects of their children’s results.
Confidentiality of results
When discussing NAPLAN Student Reports with parents, teachers should point out that the information about each child is confidential to the child’s parents, the teacher and the school.
Distribution of NAPLAN Student Reports
It is important that teachers be fully informed of the detailed results of each student and of the results for their class as a whole, and that parents have the opportunity to discuss the results with the school.
The results sent to the school provide detailed information about the achievement of each student.
This information can be used to place the NAPLAN Student Reports in a wider context that enables strategies and suggestions for learning improvement to be discussed with parents.
Parental interest in NAPLAN results is very high and it is essential that NAPLAN Student Reports are delivered as soon as possible after their arrival at the school. NAPLAN Student Reports are confidential documents that contain personal information about each student and, given the need for confidentiality, the VCAA asks all schools to consider a direct mail out to parents or to issue the reports directly, through, for example, an information night or by collection from the school by parents.
Schools should retain evidence of distribution of reports to parents at the school, for example, a letter addressed to parents or notification in the school newsletter, and schools are strongly advised to make a copy of each report and retain it at the school.
Replacement of NAPLAN Student Reports
The VCAA provides only one set of Student Reports to the school for distribution. Schools may photocopy the printed report sent to the school or access a similar report through the NAPLAN Data Service (see the Student Achievement Level Report on page 20).
NAPLAN Student Reports which carry an incorrect name as a result of incorrect information provided by the school may be replaced on request.
Queries about NAPLAN Student Reports
Parents who contact the VCAA with queries about their child’s report will, in most circumstances, be referred to the school. If the school has queries about results for particular students, it should contact the NAPLAN Helpdesk on freecall 1800 648 637 or email: [email protected]
34 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ap
pe
nd
ix 1
: N
AP
LA
N 2
015
Qu
esti
on
De
tails
The
follo
win
g ta
bles
pro
vide
det
ails
for e
ach
test
que
stio
n, in
clud
ing
a de
scri
ptio
n of
the
skill
ass
esse
d.
Plea
se n
ote
that
the
Aus
tral
ian
Cur
ricu
lum
, Ass
essm
ent a
nd R
epor
ting
Aut
hori
ty (A
CA
RA
) is
resp
onsi
ble
for t
he c
entr
al m
anag
emen
t of N
APL
AN
. AC
AR
A h
as a
sked
al
l jur
isdi
ctio
ns to
refr
ain
from
mak
ing
corr
ect a
nsw
ers
to N
APL
AN
que
stio
ns a
vail
able
on
thei
r pub
lic w
ebsi
tes.
Con
sequ
entl
y, c
orre
ct a
nsw
ers
are
not i
nclu
ded
in th
is
publ
icat
ion.
Ye
ar
3 R
ea
din
g
Que
stio
n Te
xt ti
tleS
ub-s
tran
dS
kill
asse
ssed
1Jo
eys
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a si
mpl
e fa
ctua
l tex
t.
2Jo
eys
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts in
form
atio
n in
a si
mpl
e fa
ctua
l tex
t.
3Jo
eys
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a si
mpl
e fa
ctua
l tex
t.
4Jo
eys
TLI
Infe
rs th
e re
ason
for a
com
pari
son
in a
sim
ple
fact
ual t
ext.
5Jo
eys
TLI
Iden
tifies
info
rmat
ion
in a
sim
ple
fact
ual t
ext.
6Jo
eys
CU
Iden
tifies
the
mai
n pu
rpos
e of
a si
mpl
e fa
ctua
l tex
t.
7Pl
anet
Mes
sTL
IIn
fers
the
agen
t for
an
actio
n in
a sh
ort n
arra
tive.
8Pl
anet
Mes
sTL
IIn
terp
rets
info
rmat
ion
in a
shor
t nar
rativ
e.
9Pl
anet
Mes
sTL
IIn
fers
the
refe
renc
e fo
r a re
spon
se in
a sh
ort n
arra
tive.
10Pl
anet
Mes
sTL
ILo
cate
s in
form
atio
n in
a sh
ort n
arra
tive.
11Pl
anet
Mes
sTL
ILo
cate
s di
rect
ly st
ated
info
rmat
ion
in a
shor
t nar
rativ
e.
12Pl
anet
Mes
sTL
ILo
cate
s di
rect
ly st
ated
info
rmat
ion
in a
shor
t nar
rativ
e.
13Sc
hool
hol
iday
act
iviti
es a
t the
libr
ary
TLI
Loca
tes
info
rmat
ion
in a
pos
ter.
14Sc
hool
hol
iday
act
iviti
es a
t the
libr
ary
TLI
Loca
tes
a fa
ct in
a p
oste
r.
15Sc
hool
hol
iday
act
iviti
es a
t the
libr
ary
TLI
Loca
tes
a sy
nony
m in
a p
oste
r.
16Sc
hool
hol
iday
act
iviti
es a
t the
libr
ary
TLI
Infe
rs a
fact
from
a p
oste
r.
17Sc
hool
hol
iday
act
iviti
es a
t the
libr
ary
CU
Iden
tifies
the
audi
ence
of a
pos
ter.
18Sc
hool
hol
iday
act
iviti
es a
t the
libr
ary
TLI
Iden
tifies
a fa
ct fr
om a
pos
ter.
19Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLI
Mat
ches
text
and
sym
bol i
n a
mul
ti-te
xt.
35NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
20Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
CU
Infe
rs a
n at
titud
e fr
om a
sign
in a
mul
ti-te
xt.
21Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLI
Con
nect
s co
mm
on in
form
atio
n ac
ross
a m
ulti-
text
.
22Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts a
nd su
mm
aris
es d
etai
ls in
a m
ulti-
text
.
23Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLK
Infe
rs th
e pu
rpos
e of
usi
ng th
e pr
onou
ns y
ou a
nd u
s in
a m
ulti-
text
.
24Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLK
Inte
rpre
ts th
e ov
eral
l ton
e of
one
par
t of a
mul
ti-te
xt.
25Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
CU
Iden
tifies
the
cont
rast
in to
ne b
etw
een
two
sect
ions
of a
mul
ti-te
xt.
26Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
TLI
Iden
tifies
the
com
plic
atio
n in
a fo
lkta
le.
27Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
CU
Infe
rs a
cha
ract
er’s
past
act
ions
in a
folk
tale
.
28Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
TLI
Infe
rs a
pro
blem
with
a c
hara
cter
’s ac
tions
in a
folk
tale
.
29Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a fo
lkta
le.
30Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
text
type
of a
folk
tale
.
31Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
CU
Iden
tifies
the
purp
ose
of a
folk
tale
.
32Th
e st
orm
TLI
Iden
tifies
dir
ectly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a n
arra
tive.
33Th
e st
orm
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts d
etai
ls in
a n
arra
tive.
34Th
e st
orm
TLI
Infe
rs th
e ca
use
of a
cha
ract
er’s
fear
in a
nar
rativ
e.
35Th
e st
orm
TLI
Iden
tifies
the
effe
ct o
f figu
rativ
e la
ngua
ge in
a n
arra
tive.
36Th
e st
orm
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
refe
renc
e fo
r a p
rono
un in
a n
arra
tive.
37Th
e st
orm
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
narr
ativ
e pu
rpos
e of
two
para
grap
hs in
a n
arra
tive.
38Th
e st
orm
TLI
Com
preh
ends
voc
abul
ary
in c
onte
xt in
a n
arra
tive.
39Th
e st
orm
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts a
cha
ract
er’s
thou
ghts
in a
nar
rativ
e.
KE
Y
CU
= C
onte
xtua
l und
erst
and
ing:
rel
ates
to th
e te
xt in
its
cont
ext,
incl
udin
g cu
ltur
al p
urpo
se, a
udie
nce
and
bac
kgro
und
s/in
tent
ions
/re
spon
ses
of w
rite
r/re
ader
s.
TL
I = T
ext l
ocat
ion
and
inte
rpre
tati
on: r
elat
es to
the
mea
ning
of t
ext,
incl
udin
g co
nten
t, id
eas,
info
rmat
ion,
rel
atio
nshi
ps, d
evel
opm
ent o
f arg
umen
ts a
nd p
lots
.
TL
K =
Tex
t and
lang
uage
kno
wle
dge
: rel
ates
to th
e w
ay th
e co
nstr
ucti
on o
f the
text
con
trib
utes
to it
s m
eani
ng, i
nclu
din
g th
e ef
fect
of t
he g
ener
ic s
truc
ture
, lay
out,
lang
uage
, gra
mm
ar a
nd v
isua
l ele
men
ts.
36 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
5 R
ea
din
g
Que
stio
n Te
xt ti
tleS
ub-s
tran
dS
kill
asse
ssed
1N
ew Z
eala
nd fu
rTL
ILo
cate
s di
rect
ly st
ated
info
rmat
ion
in a
n in
form
atio
n te
xt.
2N
ew Z
eala
nd fu
rTL
IIn
terp
rets
info
rmat
ion
in a
n in
form
atio
n te
xt.
3N
ew Z
eala
nd fu
rTL
IId
entifi
es th
e pu
rpos
e of
a m
ap in
an
info
rmat
ion
text
.
4N
ew Z
eala
nd fu
rTL
KId
entifi
es th
e pu
rpos
e of
a p
hoto
grap
h in
an
info
rmat
ion
text
.
5N
ew Z
eala
nd fu
rTL
IRe
cogn
ises
aut
hor's
pos
ition
in v
ocab
ular
y fr
om a
n in
form
atio
n te
xt.
6Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLI
Mat
ches
text
and
sym
bol i
n a
mul
ti-te
xt.
7Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
CU
Infe
rs a
n at
titud
e fr
om a
sign
in a
mul
ti-te
xt.
8Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLI
Con
nect
s co
mm
on in
form
atio
n ac
ross
a m
ulti-
text
.
9Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts a
nd su
mm
aris
es d
etai
ls in
a m
ulti-
text
.
10Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLK
Infe
rs th
e pu
rpos
e of
usi
ng th
e pr
onou
ns y
ou a
nd u
s in
a m
ulti-
text
.
11Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
TLK
Inte
rpre
ts th
e ov
eral
l ton
e of
one
par
t of a
mul
ti-te
xt.
12Tw
o pa
rk si
gns
CU
Iden
tifies
the
cont
rast
in to
ne b
etw
een
two
sect
ions
of a
mul
ti-te
xt.
13Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
TLI
Iden
tifies
the
com
plic
atio
n in
a fo
lkta
le.
14Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
CU
Infe
rs a
cha
ract
er’s
past
act
ions
in a
folk
tale
.
15Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
TLI
Infe
rs a
pro
blem
with
a c
hara
cter
’s ac
tions
in a
folk
tale
.
16Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a fo
lkta
le.
17Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
text
type
of a
folk
tale
.
18Th
e fir
st m
occa
sins
CU
Iden
tifies
the
purp
ose
of a
folk
tale
.
19Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
a si
tuat
ion
in th
e fir
st s
ente
nce
of a
nar
rativ
e.
20Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
info
rmat
ion
in a
nar
rativ
e.
21Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
a fi
gura
tive
desc
ript
ion
in a
nar
rativ
e.
22Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
a c
hara
cter
’s re
spon
se to
an
even
t in
a na
rrat
ive.
23Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
the
effe
ct o
f a w
ord
in a
nar
rativ
e.
37NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
24Th
e m
issi
onTL
IId
entifi
es th
e ch
ange
in a
cha
ract
er’s
attit
ude
in a
nar
rativ
e.
25Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
fers
a le
ader
ship
role
in a
nar
rativ
e.
26Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
27Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLI
Iden
tifies
and
app
lies
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
28Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
CU
Synt
hesi
ses
the
mai
n id
ea o
f a p
arag
raph
in a
fact
ual t
ext.
29Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLK
Iden
tifies
a p
ersu
asiv
e st
rate
gy in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
30Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLI
Con
nect
s in
form
atio
n ac
ross
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
31Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLI
Iden
tifies
the
mea
ning
of a
n id
iom
atic
phr
ase
in a
fact
ual t
ext.
32Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLK
Infe
rs th
e na
ture
of a
clo
sing
stat
emen
t in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
33G
ame
revi
ew: C
raw
lin' K
itten
2TL
IId
entifi
es th
e re
fere
nce
for a
des
crip
tion
in a
gam
e re
view
.
34G
ame
revi
ew: C
raw
lin' K
itten
2TL
IIn
terp
rets
figu
rativ
e la
ngua
ge in
a g
ame
revi
ew.
35G
ame
revi
ew: C
raw
lin' K
itten
2C
UId
entifi
es a
per
suas
ive
stra
tegy
in a
gam
e re
view
.
36G
ame
revi
ew: C
raw
lin' K
itten
2TL
KId
entifi
es a
per
suas
ive
tech
niqu
e in
a g
ame
revi
ew.
37G
ame
revi
ew: C
raw
lin' K
itten
2C
UId
entifi
es th
e re
ason
for a
fact
in a
gam
e re
view
.
38G
ame
revi
ew: C
raw
lin' K
itten
2C
UId
entifi
es p
ersu
asiv
e ad
ject
ives
to c
onve
y ju
dgem
ent i
n a
gam
e re
view
.
39G
ame
revi
ew: C
raw
lin' K
itten
2C
UId
entifi
es th
e ov
eral
l ton
e of
a g
ame
revi
ew.
KE
Y
CU
= C
onte
xtua
l und
erst
and
ing:
rel
ates
to th
e te
xt in
its
cont
ext,
incl
udin
g cu
ltur
al p
urpo
se, a
udie
nce
and
bac
kgro
und
s/in
tent
ions
/re
spon
ses
of w
rite
r/re
ader
s.
TL
I = T
ext l
ocat
ion
and
inte
rpre
tati
on: r
elat
es to
the
mea
ning
of t
ext,
incl
udin
g co
nten
t, id
eas,
info
rmat
ion,
rel
atio
nshi
ps, d
evel
opm
ent o
f arg
umen
ts a
nd p
lots
.
TL
K =
Tex
t and
lang
uage
kno
wle
dge
: rel
ates
to th
e w
ay th
e co
nstr
ucti
on o
f the
text
con
trib
utes
to it
s m
eani
ng, i
nclu
din
g th
e ef
fect
of t
he g
ener
ic s
truc
ture
, lay
out,
lang
uage
, gra
mm
ar a
nd v
isua
l ele
men
ts.
38 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
7 R
ea
din
g
Que
stio
n Te
xt ti
tleS
ub-s
tran
dS
kill
asse
ssed
1Th
e py
gmy
mar
mos
etTL
KIn
fers
the
reas
on fo
r a p
hoto
grap
h in
a sh
ort r
epor
t.
2Th
e py
gmy
mar
mos
etTL
KIn
fers
the
sign
ifica
nce
of a
map
in a
shor
t rep
ort.
3Th
e py
gmy
mar
mos
etTL
IId
entifi
es a
cha
ract
eris
tic in
a sh
ort r
epor
t.
4Th
e py
gmy
mar
mos
etTL
ILo
cate
s di
rect
ly st
ated
info
rmat
ion
in a
shor
t rep
ort.
5Th
e py
gmy
mar
mos
etTL
ILo
cate
s di
rect
ly st
ated
info
rmat
ion
in a
shor
t rep
ort.
6Th
e py
gmy
mar
mos
etTL
KIn
fers
whe
re a
n ad
ditio
nal f
act w
ould
fit i
n a
shor
t rep
ort.
7Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
a si
tuat
ion
in th
e fir
st s
ente
nce
of a
nar
rativ
e.
8Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
a fi
gura
tive
desc
ript
ion
in a
nar
rativ
e.
9Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
a c
hara
cter
’s re
spon
se to
an
even
t in
a na
rrat
ive.
10Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
terp
rets
the
effe
ct o
f a w
ord
in a
nar
rativ
e.
11Th
e m
issi
onTL
IId
entifi
es th
e ch
ange
in a
cha
ract
er’s
attit
ude
in a
nar
rativ
e.
12Th
e m
issi
onTL
IIn
fers
a le
ader
ship
role
in a
nar
rativ
e.
13Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Infe
rs th
e st
atus
of a
cha
ract
er in
the
rete
lling
of a
myt
h.
14Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Infe
rs a
n at
titud
e in
the
rete
lling
of a
myt
h.
15Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Infe
rs th
e ba
ckgr
ound
to th
e ac
tion
in th
e re
telli
ng o
f a m
yth.
16Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts a
n ex
pres
sion
in th
e re
telli
ng o
f a m
yth.
17Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
the
rete
lling
of a
myt
h.
18Th
e M
inot
aur
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
purp
ose
of b
rack
ets
in th
e re
telli
ng o
f a m
yth.
19Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
20Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLI
Iden
tifies
and
app
lies
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
21Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
CU
Synt
hesi
ses
the
mai
n id
ea o
f a p
arag
raph
in a
fact
ual t
ext.
22Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLK
Iden
tifies
a p
ersu
asiv
e st
rate
gy in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
23Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLI
Con
nect
s in
form
atio
n ac
ross
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
39NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
24Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLI
Iden
tifies
the
mea
ning
of a
n id
iom
atic
phr
ase
in a
fact
ual t
ext.
25Th
e ho
ney
bee
mys
tery
TLK
Infe
rs th
e na
ture
of a
clo
sing
stat
emen
t in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
26H
ard
runn
ing
TLI
Iden
tifies
a s
ourc
e of
tens
ion
betw
een
char
acte
rs in
a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
27H
ard
runn
ing
TLI
Infe
rs th
e m
eani
ng o
f an
idio
m in
a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
28H
ard
runn
ing
TLI
Infe
rs th
e m
eani
ng o
f a w
ord
in c
onte
xt in
a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
29H
ard
runn
ing
TLI
Infe
rs th
e re
ason
for fi
gura
tive
lang
uage
in a
nar
rativ
e ex
trac
t.
30H
ard
runn
ing
TLI
Sele
cts
voca
bula
ry th
at a
ppea
ls to
a s
ense
in a
nar
rativ
e ex
trac
t.
31H
ard
runn
ing
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts a
cha
ract
er’s
mot
ivat
ion
in a
nar
rativ
e ex
trac
t.
32A
way
forw
ard
TLK
Inte
rpre
ts th
e ef
fect
of p
rono
un s
elec
tion
in a
per
suas
ive
narr
ativ
e.
33A
way
forw
ard
CU
Inte
rpre
ts a
cha
ract
er’s
stan
ce in
a p
ersu
asiv
e na
rrat
ive.
34A
way
forw
ard
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts th
e m
eani
ng o
f a p
hras
e in
a p
ersu
asiv
e na
rrat
ive.
35A
way
forw
ard
TLI
Infe
rs m
eani
ng fr
om c
hara
cter
s’ a
ctio
ns in
a p
ersu
asiv
e na
rrat
ive.
36A
way
forw
ard
TLI
Synt
hesi
ses
info
rmat
ion
acro
ss a
per
suas
ive
narr
ativ
e to
iden
tify
a th
eme.
37A
way
forw
ard
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts p
erce
ptio
n of
a c
hara
cter
in a
per
suas
ive
narr
ativ
e.
38G
lidin
g th
roug
h th
e de
epTL
IIn
terp
rets
an
expl
anat
ion
in a
n in
form
atio
n te
xt.
39G
lidin
g th
roug
h th
e de
epTL
ILo
cate
s a
reas
on fo
r an
actio
n in
an
info
rmat
ion
text
.
40G
lidin
g th
roug
h th
e de
epTL
IIn
terp
rets
a q
uota
tion
in a
n in
form
atio
n te
xt.
41G
lidin
g th
roug
h th
e de
epC
UIn
fers
the
purp
ose
of a
par
agra
ph in
an
info
rmat
ion
text
.
42G
lidin
g th
roug
h th
e de
epTL
IIn
terp
rets
det
ails
in a
n in
form
atio
n te
xt.
43G
lidin
g th
roug
h th
e de
epTL
IId
entifi
es a
quo
tatio
n su
ppor
ting
a po
int o
f vie
w in
an
info
rmat
ion
text
.
40 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
44Pe
er p
ress
ure
- a p
ositi
ve p
ersp
ectiv
eTL
ISy
nthe
sise
s in
form
atio
n to
mak
e a
judg
emen
t abo
ut a
per
suas
ive
text
.
45Pe
er p
ress
ure
- a p
ositi
ve p
ersp
ectiv
eTL
IC
ompr
ehen
ds v
ocab
ular
y in
con
text
in a
per
suas
ive
text
.
46Pe
er p
ress
ure
- a p
ositi
ve p
ersp
ectiv
eTL
KId
entifi
es th
e m
ain
purp
ose
of a
par
agra
ph in
a p
ersu
asiv
e te
xt.
47Pe
er p
ress
ure
- a p
ositi
ve p
ersp
ectiv
eTL
IEv
alua
tes
a pe
rsua
sive
text
to d
eriv
e m
eani
ng o
f an
expr
essi
on.
48Pe
er p
ress
ure
- a p
ositi
ve p
ersp
ectiv
eC
ULo
cate
s in
form
atio
n in
a p
ersu
asiv
e te
xt.
49Pe
er p
ress
ure
- a p
ositi
ve p
ersp
ectiv
eC
UId
entifi
es th
e to
ne o
f a p
ersu
asiv
e te
xt.
KE
Y
CU
= C
onte
xtua
l und
erst
and
ing:
rel
ates
to th
e te
xt in
its
cont
ext,
incl
udin
g cu
ltur
al p
urpo
se, a
udie
nce
and
bac
kgro
und
s/in
tent
ions
/re
spon
ses
of w
rite
r/re
ader
s.
TL
I = T
ext l
ocat
ion
and
inte
rpre
tati
on: r
elat
es to
the
mea
ning
of t
ext,
incl
udin
g co
nten
t, id
eas,
info
rmat
ion,
rel
atio
nshi
ps, d
evel
opm
ent o
f arg
umen
ts a
nd p
lots
.
TL
K =
Tex
t and
lang
uage
kno
wle
dge
: rel
ates
to th
e w
ay th
e co
nstr
ucti
on o
f the
text
con
trib
utes
to it
s m
eani
ng, i
nclu
din
g th
e ef
fect
of t
he g
ener
ic s
truc
ture
, lay
out,
lang
uage
, gra
mm
ar a
nd v
isua
l ele
men
ts.
41NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
9 R
ea
din
g
Que
stio
n Te
xt ti
tleS
ub-s
tran
dS
kill
asse
ssed
1M
usic
for t
he P
lane
tTL
ILo
cate
s a
stat
ed d
etai
l in
a po
ster
.
2M
usic
for t
he P
lane
tTL
ILo
cate
s a
stat
ed d
etai
l in
a po
ster
.
3M
usic
for t
he P
lane
tTL
IM
akes
con
nect
ions
bet
wee
n de
tails
in a
pos
ter.
4M
usic
for t
he P
lane
tTL
IIn
terp
rets
the
purp
ose
of a
vis
ual m
etap
hor i
n a
post
er.
5M
usic
for t
he P
lane
tTL
IIn
fers
the
mea
ning
of a
pro
verb
in a
pos
ter.
6M
usic
for t
he P
lane
tTL
KId
entifi
es th
e m
ain
purp
ose
of a
pos
ter.
7Th
e be
st m
edic
ine
TLI
Infe
rs a
gen
eral
isat
ion
in a
fact
ual t
ext.
8Th
e be
st m
edic
ine
TLI
Iden
tifies
dir
ectly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
9Th
e be
st m
edic
ine
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts in
form
atio
n in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
10Th
e be
st m
edic
ine
TLK
Infe
rs th
e pu
rpos
e of
inve
rted
com
mas
in a
fact
ual t
ext.
11Th
e be
st m
edic
ine
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
12Th
e be
st m
edic
ine
CU
Inte
rpre
ts th
e pu
rpos
e of
a fa
ctua
l tex
t.
13Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Infe
rs th
e st
atus
of a
cha
ract
er in
the
rete
lling
of a
myt
h.
14Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Infe
rs a
n at
titud
e in
the
rete
lling
of a
myt
h.
15Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Infe
rs th
e ba
ckgr
ound
to th
e ac
tion
in th
e re
telli
ng o
f a m
yth.
16Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts a
n ex
pres
sion
in th
e re
telli
ng o
f a m
yth.
17Th
e M
inot
aur
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
the
rete
lling
of a
myt
h.
18Th
e M
inot
aur
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
purp
ose
of b
rack
ets
in th
e re
telli
ng o
f a m
yth.
19A
way
forw
ard
TLK
Inte
rpre
ts th
e ef
fect
of p
rono
un s
elec
tion
in a
per
suas
ive
narr
ativ
e.
20A
way
forw
ard
CU
Inte
rpre
ts a
cha
ract
er’s
stan
ce in
a p
ersu
asiv
e na
rrat
ive.
21A
way
forw
ard
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts th
e m
eani
ng o
f a p
hras
e in
a p
ersu
asiv
e na
rrat
ive.
22A
way
forw
ard
TLI
Infe
rs m
eani
ng fr
om c
hara
cter
s’ a
ctio
ns in
a p
ersu
asiv
e na
rrat
ive.
23A
way
forw
ard
TLI
Synt
hesi
ses
info
rmat
ion
acro
ss a
per
suas
ive
narr
ativ
e to
iden
tify
a th
eme.
24A
way
forw
ard
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts p
erce
ptio
n of
a c
hara
cter
in a
per
suas
ive
narr
ativ
e.
42 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
25C
affe
ine
- an
eye
open
er!
TLK
Reco
gnis
es th
e pu
rpos
e of
a d
iagr
am in
a p
ersu
asiv
e te
xt.
26C
affe
ine
- an
eye
open
er!
TLI
Synt
hesi
ses
info
rmat
ion
in a
sec
tion
of p
ersu
asiv
e te
xt.
27C
affe
ine
- an
eye
open
er!
TLI
Loca
tes
info
rmat
ion
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
a p
ersu
asiv
e te
xt.
28C
affe
ine
- an
eye
open
er!
TLK
Inte
rpre
ts th
e ef
fect
of a
n ex
pres
sion
in a
per
suas
ive
text
.
29C
affe
ine
- an
eye
open
er!
TLK
Giv
es tw
o in
terp
reta
tions
of t
he ti
tle o
f a p
ersu
asiv
e te
xt. G
ives
one
inte
rpre
tatio
n of
the
title
of a
per
suas
ive
text
.
30C
affe
ine
- an
eye
open
er!
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
styl
e of
a p
ersu
asiv
e te
xt.
31C
affe
ine
- an
eye
open
er!
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
bias
in a
per
suas
ive
text
.
32M
rs D
ougl
asTL
IIn
fers
a re
ason
in a
nar
rativ
e ex
trac
t.
33M
rs D
ougl
asTL
IIn
fers
the
tone
of t
he n
arra
tor i
n a
narr
ativ
e ex
trac
t.
34M
rs D
ougl
asTL
IIn
terp
rets
a c
hara
cter
's in
sigh
t in
a na
rrat
ive
extr
act.
35M
rs D
ougl
asTL
IIn
fers
the
mot
ivat
ion
of a
cha
ract
er in
a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
36M
rs D
ougl
asC
UId
entifi
es th
e m
eani
ng o
f an
expr
essi
on in
a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
37M
rs D
ougl
asTL
IRe
cogn
ises
form
attin
g of
a c
hara
cter
's ac
cent
in a
nar
rativ
e ex
trac
t.
38M
rs D
ougl
asTL
IIn
fers
a c
hara
cter
trai
t in
a na
rrat
ive
extr
act.
39A
uror
as: n
eon
sign
s in
the
sky
TLI
Loca
tes
dire
ctly
stat
ed in
form
atio
n in
a s
cien
tific
expl
anat
ion.
40A
uror
as: n
eon
sign
s in
the
sky
TLI
Loca
tes
thre
e pi
eces
of i
nfor
mat
ion
in a
sci
entifi
c ex
plan
atio
n.
41A
uror
as: n
eon
sign
s in
the
sky
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
reas
on fo
r use
of i
nver
ted
com
mas
in a
sci
entifi
c ex
plan
atio
n.
42A
uror
as: n
eon
sign
s in
the
sky
TLK
Eval
uate
s th
e pu
rpos
e of
a c
ompa
riso
n in
a s
cien
tific
expl
anat
ion.
43A
uror
as: n
eon
sign
s in
the
sky
CU
Iden
tifies
the
purp
ose
of a
par
agra
ph in
a s
cien
tific
expl
anat
ion.
44A
uror
as: n
eon
sign
s in
the
sky
CU
Iden
tifies
the
com
mon
con
tent
bet
wee
n op
enin
g an
d cl
osin
g pa
ragr
aphs
in a
sci
entifi
c ex
plan
atio
n.
43NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
45Lo
st a
nd fo
und
TLI
Iden
tifies
the
sequ
ence
of e
vent
s in
a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
46Lo
st a
nd fo
und
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts th
e m
ain
char
acte
r’s fe
elin
gs in
a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
47Lo
st a
nd fo
und
TLK
Inte
rpre
ts th
e us
e of
ital
ics
in a
nar
rativ
e ex
trac
t.
48Lo
st a
nd fo
und
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts in
form
atio
n in
a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
49Lo
st a
nd fo
und
TLK
Iden
tifies
the
use
of fl
ashb
ack
in a
nar
rativ
e ex
trac
t.
50Lo
st a
nd fo
und
TLI
Inte
rpre
ts th
e to
ne o
f a n
arra
tive
extr
act.
KE
Y
CU
= C
onte
xtua
l und
erst
and
ing:
rel
ates
to th
e te
xt in
its
cont
ext,
incl
udin
g cu
ltur
al p
urpo
se, a
udie
nce
and
bac
kgro
und
s/in
tent
ions
/re
spon
ses
of w
rite
r/re
ader
s.
TL
I = T
ext l
ocat
ion
and
inte
rpre
tati
on: r
elat
es to
the
mea
ning
of t
ext,
incl
udin
g co
nten
t, id
eas,
info
rmat
ion,
rel
atio
nshi
ps, d
evel
opm
ent o
f arg
umen
ts a
nd p
lots
.
TL
K =
Tex
t and
lang
uage
kno
wle
dge
: rel
ates
to th
e w
ay th
e co
nstr
ucti
on o
f the
text
con
trib
utes
to it
s m
eani
ng, i
nclu
din
g th
e ef
fect
of t
he g
ener
ic s
truc
ture
, lay
out,
lang
uage
, gra
mm
ar a
nd v
isua
l ele
men
ts.
44 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
3 L
ang
uag
e C
onve
nti
on
s
Que
stio
n M
issp
elt w
ord
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1fa
seId
entifi
es a
n er
ror i
n a
one-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fr
icat
ive
-c.
2do
reId
entifi
es a
n er
ror i
n a
one-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fin
al lo
ng v
owel
pat
tern
-oor
.
3fr
ogg
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fin
al si
ngle
con
sona
nt –
g.
4be
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
hom
opho
ne w
ith th
e fin
al lo
ng v
owel
dig
raph
-ee.
5sp
yder
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
med
ial l
ong
vow
el -i
.
6en
joi
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
dig
raph
-oy.
7ro
ket
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
med
ial d
igra
ph –
ck.
8ed
jeC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
final
con
sona
nt p
atte
rn -d
ge.
9cu
ver
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
shor
t vow
el –
o.
10sw
onC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
shor
t vow
el –
a.
11ar
test
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
suffi
x –i
st.
12m
ulta
ply
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l sch
wa
-i.
13ch
ork
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fin
al lo
ng v
owel
pat
tern
–al
k.
14ek
sact
lyC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
lette
r –x
at th
e sy
llabl
e ju
nctu
re.
15tr
eyId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
final
long
vow
el d
igra
ph –
ay.
16w
oude
n Id
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
shor
t vow
el d
igra
ph –
oo.
17ra
bit
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
doub
le le
tter –
bb a
t the
sylla
ble
junc
ture
.
18na
led
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
dig
raph
–ai
.
19bu
nchs
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
suffi
x –e
s.
20th
ankf
ull
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
suffi
x –f
ul.
21in
seck
sId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fin
al c
onso
nant
pat
tern
–ct
s.
22nu
rsry
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l elid
ed –
e.
23st
omac
kId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fin
al s
ound
k re
pres
ente
d by
–ch
.
24sq
uees
edId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
pat
tern
–ee
ze.
25di
sgis
edId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l let
ter p
atte
rn –
gu.
45NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Que
stio
nC
urri
culu
m A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
26G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect p
repo
sitio
n to
com
plet
e a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
27G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect p
repo
sitio
n to
com
plet
e a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
28G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
adje
ctiv
e to
com
plet
e a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
29G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
adje
ctiv
e in
a c
ompo
und
sent
ence
.
30G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect s
uper
lativ
e fo
rm o
f an
adje
ctiv
e to
com
plet
e a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
31G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect d
eter
min
er to
com
plet
e a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
32Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t pos
ition
for a
list
com
ma
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
33G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect p
lura
l pro
noun
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
34Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e si
mpl
e se
nten
ce re
quir
ing
a qu
estio
n m
ark.
35G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
adve
rb in
a c
ompo
und
sent
ence
.
36G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect u
se o
f an
irre
gula
r ver
b in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
37G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ectly
stru
ctur
ed si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
38Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t pun
ctua
tion
of a
list
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
39G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect u
se o
f an
irre
gula
r ver
b in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
40G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect u
se o
f a p
osse
ssiv
e pr
onou
n in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
41Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t pun
ctua
tion
of d
irec
t spe
ech
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
42G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a c
orre
ct si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
43Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es a
cor
rect
ly p
unct
uate
d co
ntra
ctio
n in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
44G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
noun
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
45G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a c
omm
and.
46Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t bou
ndar
y pu
nctu
atio
n fo
r a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
47Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t bou
ndar
y pu
nctu
atio
n be
twee
n a
com
plex
and
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
48G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
with
the
corr
ect u
se o
f an
inde
finite
art
icle
.
49G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
whi
ch c
orre
ctly
com
bine
s al
l the
info
rmat
ion
in a
tabl
e.
50G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
noun
whi
ch h
as th
e sa
me
sing
ular
and
plu
ral f
orm
s.
51Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t pun
ctua
tion
of p
rope
r nou
ns in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
46 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
5 L
ang
uag
e C
onve
nti
on
s
Que
stio
n M
issp
elt w
ord
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1fu
nnee
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
long
vow
el e
ndin
g –y
.
2ro
ket
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
med
ial d
igra
ph –
ck.
3co
mun
ityC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
four
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
doub
le c
onso
nant
–m
m a
t the
sylla
ble
junc
ture
.
4sw
onC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e sh
ort v
owel
–o.
5sh
olde
rC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e sh
ort v
owel
dig
raph
–ou
.
6te
wb
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
pat
tern
u-e
.
7cr
aite
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
pat
tern
a-e
.
8m
ulta
ply
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l sch
wa
-i.
9pe
ngw
inC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e le
tter p
atte
rn –
gu.
10st
ake
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
hom
opho
ne w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
dig
raph
-ea.
11ho
neyc
oam
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
com
poun
d w
ord
with
the
final
sile
nt le
tter –
b.
12ek
sact
lyC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
lette
r –x
at th
e sy
llabl
e ju
nctu
re.
13sh
eeld
sC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
long
vow
el d
igra
ph -i
e.
14ad
dults
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
sing
le le
tter –
d at
the
sylla
ble
junc
ture
.
15w
oude
n Id
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
shor
t vow
el d
igra
ph –
oo.
16dr
ide
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e su
ffix
-ed,
requ
irin
g a
chan
ge to
the
base
wor
d (c
hang
e y
to i)
.
17to
sted
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
long
vow
el d
igra
ph -o
a.
18nu
rsry
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l elid
ed –
e.
19st
omac
kId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fin
al s
ound
k re
pres
ente
d by
–ch
.
20he
leco
pter
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e et
ymol
ogic
al e
lem
ent h
eli-.
21sq
uees
edId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
long
vow
el p
atte
rn –
eeze
.
22in
tafe
reId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
etym
olog
ical
ele
men
t int
er-.
23su
cces
sful
lId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
suffi
x –f
ul.
24he
aval
lyId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
suffi
x –l
y, re
quir
ing
a ch
ange
to th
e ba
se w
ord
(cha
nge
y to
i)
25ve
hica
lsId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
prim
ary
endi
ng –
le.
47NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Que
stio
n C
urri
culu
m A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
26G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
adje
ctiv
e to
com
plet
e a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
27Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e si
mpl
e se
nten
ce re
quir
ing
a qu
estio
n m
ark.
28G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect p
lura
l pro
noun
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
29G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a th
inki
ng v
erb
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
30G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
adve
rb in
a c
ompo
und
sent
ence
.
31G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect w
ord
to c
ompl
ete
a co
mpo
und
prep
ositi
on in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
32Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t pun
ctua
tion
of a
list
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
33G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect u
se o
f his
/he's
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
34Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t pun
ctua
tion
of d
irec
t spe
ech
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
35G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect m
ain
clau
se to
com
plet
e a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
36Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es a
cor
rect
ly p
unct
uate
d si
mpl
e se
nten
ce .
37G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect v
erb
form
to c
ompl
ete
a co
mpl
ex s
ente
nce.
38G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
that
cor
rect
ly c
ombi
nes
info
rmat
ion
from
two
sent
ence
s.
39G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
that
use
s a
cont
ract
ion
corr
ectly
.
40G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sim
ple
sent
ence
con
tain
ing
an a
djec
tive.
41G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
refe
renc
e fo
r a p
rono
un in
a sh
ort t
ext.
42Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es c
orre
ct s
ente
nce
boun
dary
pun
ctua
tion
in tw
o si
mpl
e se
nten
ces.
43G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a c
omm
and.
44G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
with
the
corr
ect i
ndefi
nite
art
icle
.
45Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
tly p
unct
uate
d se
nten
ce.
46Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of p
aire
d co
mm
as to
indi
cate
add
ition
al in
form
atio
n in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
47G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a n
oun
whi
ch h
as th
e sa
me
form
in th
e si
ngul
ar a
nd p
lura
l.
48Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es c
orre
ctly
pun
ctua
ted
indi
rect
spee
ch in
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
49Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e pa
ir o
f wor
ds th
at c
an fo
rm a
con
trac
tion.
50G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect n
oun/
pron
oun
agre
emen
t in
a co
mpl
ex s
ente
nce.
51G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
first
eve
nt in
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
48 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
7 L
ang
uag
e C
onve
nti
on
s
Que
stio
n M
issp
elt w
ord
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1hi
way
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e co
mpo
und
wor
d w
ith th
e le
tter p
atte
rn –
igh.
2sh
olde
rC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e sh
ort v
owel
dig
raph
–ou
.
3tr
aditi
onel
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e su
ffix
–al.
4on
yon
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
sem
i vow
el –
i.
5pr
ayC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e ho
mop
hone
with
the
final
long
vow
el p
atte
rn –
ey.
6cr
aite
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
pat
tern
a-e
.
7pu
mki
nC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e si
ngle
con
sona
nt –
p at
the
sylla
ble
junc
ture
.
8bo
rtC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
one
-syl
labl
e ho
mop
hone
with
the
long
vow
el p
atte
rn –
ough
.
9pe
ngw
inC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l let
ter p
atte
rn –
gu.
10w
ayed
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
near
hom
opho
ne w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
pat
tern
-eig
h.
11ho
neyc
oam
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
com
poun
d w
ord
with
the
final
sile
nt le
tter –
b.
12lif
egar
dsC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
com
poun
d w
ord
with
the
lette
r pat
tern
–gu
.
13or
bet
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
schw
a -i.
14pr
ecip
itasi
onC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
five
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
endi
ng -t
ion.
15sa
mm
onC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l sile
nt le
tter –
l.
16qu
ewe
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e se
mi v
owel
pat
tern
–eu
e.
17pr
edic
tible
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e su
ffix
–abl
e.
18he
leco
pter
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e et
ymol
ogic
al e
lem
ent h
eli-.
19ex
piri
ence
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
–e.
20in
tafe
reId
entifi
es a
n er
ror,
then
cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e et
ymol
ogic
al e
lem
ent i
nter
-.
21ca
tago
ries
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r, th
en c
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
four
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
schw
a re
pres
ente
d by
-e.
22su
cces
sful
lId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
suffi
x –f
ul.
23he
aval
lyId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
suffi
x –l
y, re
quir
ing
a ch
ange
to th
e ba
se w
ord
(cha
nge
y to
i)
24ac
heiv
edId
entifi
es a
nd e
rror
then
cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
long
vow
el d
igra
ph –
ie.
25ex
plai
natio
nId
entifi
es a
n er
ror,
then
cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
noun
with
the
suffi
x -t
ion
requ
irin
g a
chan
ge to
the
base
wor
d.
26re
lave
ntId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
med
ial s
chw
a –e
and
the
endi
ng –
ant.
49NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
27no
xous
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
endi
ng –
ious
.
28co
ntre
rdic
ted
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r, th
en c
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
four
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
etym
olog
ical
ele
men
t con
tra-
.
29fo
lige
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fin
al le
tter p
atte
rn –
iage
.
30m
arat
ime
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l sch
wa
–i.
Que
stio
n C
urri
culu
m A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
31Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e si
mpl
e se
nten
ce re
quir
ing
a qu
estio
n m
ark.
32G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect v
erb
form
to c
ompl
ete
a co
mpl
ex s
ente
nce.
33G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect u
se o
f a p
repo
sitio
n in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
34G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
with
a c
ompl
ex n
oun
grou
p.
35G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
non-
finite
form
of a
ver
b to
com
plet
e a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
36G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
mai
n cl
ause
that
cor
rect
ly c
ompl
etes
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
37Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es c
orre
ct sp
eech
pun
ctua
tion
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
38Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of a
com
ma
for a
dep
enda
nt c
laus
e.
39G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
that
cor
rect
ly c
ombi
nes
info
rmat
ion
from
two
sent
ence
s.
40Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of b
rack
ets
to e
nclo
se th
e ex
plan
atio
n of
an
acro
nym
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
41G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
that
use
s a
cont
ract
ion
corr
ectly
.
42G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sim
ple
sent
ence
con
tain
ing
an a
djec
tive.
43Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of c
laus
e an
d lis
t com
mas
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
44G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a c
omm
and.
45Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e se
nten
ce th
at u
ses
corr
ect c
apita
lisat
ion
of p
rope
r nou
ns.
46Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e in
corr
ect u
se o
f a p
osse
ssiv
e ap
ostr
ophe
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
47G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect s
ynon
ym fo
r a m
odal
ver
b.
48G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect s
uffix
that
cha
nges
a v
erb
to a
n ad
ject
ive.
49Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of p
aire
d co
mm
as to
indi
cate
add
ition
al in
form
atio
n in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
50 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
50Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of h
yphe
ns fo
r a c
ompo
und
adje
ctiv
e in
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
51Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es c
orre
ctly
pun
ctua
ted
indi
rect
spee
ch in
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
52G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a c
ompo
und
sent
ence
.
53G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect s
eque
ncin
g of
tens
es in
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
54G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect u
se o
f an
adve
rb in
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
55G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect n
oun/
pron
oun
agre
emen
t in
a co
mpl
ex s
ente
nce.
56G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect c
lass
ifica
tions
of t
wo
wor
ds w
ith th
e sa
me
base
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
57G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
noun
from
a li
st o
f wor
ds w
ith th
e sa
me
base
.
58Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of d
ashe
s to
indi
cate
add
ition
al in
form
atio
n in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
51NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
9 L
ang
uag
e C
onve
nti
on
s
Que
stio
n M
issp
elt w
ord
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1tr
aditi
onel
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e su
ffix
–al.
2pu
mki
nC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e si
ngle
con
sona
nt –
p at
the
sylla
ble
junc
ture
.
3ro
otin
eC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
dig
raph
–ou
.
4th
eary
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
schw
a –o
.
5or
bet
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
schw
a -i.
6ra
dias
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e en
ding
-us.
7sa
mm
onC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e m
edia
l sile
nt le
tter –
l.
8hi
llari
ous
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e si
ngle
con
sona
nt –
l at t
he sy
llabl
e ju
nctu
re.
9he
ctai
rsC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
pat
tern
–ar
e.
10ill
egal
yC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
four
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
long
vow
el p
atte
rn u
-e b
efor
e th
e su
ffix
–ly.
11ab
solu
tlyC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
four
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
prim
ary
endi
ng –
ute b
efor
e th
e su
ffix
–ly.
12co
nven
iant
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e en
ding
-ent
.
13qu
ewe
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a o
ne-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e se
mi v
owel
pat
tern
–eu
e.
14vi
gero
usC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
med
ial s
chw
a –o
.
15co
nsin
emen
tC
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
long
vow
el p
atte
rn –
ign.
16bo
yant
Cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
long
vow
el p
atte
rn –
uoy.
17id
ente
tyId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
med
ial s
chw
a –i
.
18ex
piri
ence
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a fo
ur-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
–e.
19gl
acia
rId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
thre
e-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
unac
cent
ed e
ndin
g –e
r.
20ac
heiv
edId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
two-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e lo
ng v
owel
dig
raph
–ie.
21re
ckag
eId
entifi
es a
n er
ror,
then
cor
rect
ly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
sile
nt in
itial
lette
r -w.
22ce
rcum
navi
gate
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r, th
en c
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
five
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
etym
olog
ical
ele
men
t circ
um-.
23pl
atyp
uss
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e fin
al si
ngle
con
sona
nt -s
.
24se
nsus
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
initi
al s
ound
s re
pres
ente
d by
c.
52 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
25no
xous
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a tw
o-sy
llabl
e w
ord
with
the
endi
ng –
ious
.
26co
ntre
rdic
ted
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r, th
en c
orre
ctly
spel
ls a
four
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
etym
olog
ical
ele
men
t con
tra-
.
27fo
lige
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e en
ding
–ia
ge.
28ae
riel
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a th
ree-
sylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e un
stre
ssed
end
ing
–al.
29oc
cass
iona
llyId
entifi
es a
n er
ror t
hen
corr
ectly
spel
ls a
five
-syl
labl
e w
ord
with
the
sing
le c
onso
nant
s at
the
sylla
ble
junc
ture
.
30ve
tinar
ian
Iden
tifies
an
erro
r the
n co
rrec
tly sp
ells
a fi
ve-s
ylla
ble
wor
d w
ith th
e el
ided
-e.
Que
stio
n C
urri
culu
m A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
31G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect u
se o
f a c
ompo
und
verb
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
32G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect w
ords
to c
ompl
ete
a de
pend
ent c
laus
e.
33G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect d
epen
dent
cla
use
to c
ompl
ete
a co
mpl
ex s
ente
nce.
34G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect p
repo
sitio
n to
com
plet
e a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
35Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of a
com
ma
for a
dep
enda
nt c
laus
e.
36Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of b
rack
ets
to e
nclo
se th
e ex
plan
atio
n of
an
acro
nym
in a
sim
ple
sent
ence
.
37G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a c
orre
ct si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
38G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect r
efer
ence
for a
pro
noun
in a
shor
t pas
sage
.
39G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect c
ompo
und
subj
ect i
n a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
40Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of c
laus
e co
mm
as a
nd b
rack
ets
to in
dica
te a
dditi
onal
info
rmat
ion
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
41G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect s
ynon
ym fo
r a m
odal
ver
b.
42Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of c
omm
as in
a c
ompl
ex li
st.
43G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect m
ain
clau
se to
com
plet
e a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
44G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect s
uffix
that
cha
nges
a v
erb
to a
n ad
ject
ive.
45G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
pair
of s
ente
nces
whi
ch c
orre
ctly
use
the
hom
opho
ne w
ho’s
and
who
se.
46Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of c
apita
l let
ters
for p
rope
r nou
ns in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
47Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e se
nten
ce th
at c
orre
ctly
use
s th
e ho
mop
hone
its
and
it’s.
48G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect p
aral
lel s
truc
ture
in a
com
poun
d se
nten
ce.
53NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
49Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of h
yphe
ns fo
r a c
ompo
und
adje
ctiv
e in
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
50G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
mai
n cl
ause
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
51Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t pun
ctua
tion
of d
irec
t spe
ech
with
inte
rnal
att
ribu
tion.
52G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
a c
ompo
und
sent
ence
.
53G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
whi
ch c
orre
ctly
rela
tes
the
intr
oduc
tory
ele
men
t to
the
subj
ect.
54Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of a
sem
i-col
on in
a si
mpl
e se
nten
ce.
55G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
sent
ence
whi
ch u
ses
the
wor
d re
sear
ch a
s a
noun
.
56G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
corr
ect c
lass
ifica
tions
of t
wo
wor
ds w
ith th
e sa
me
base
in a
com
plex
sen
tenc
e.
57Pu
nctu
atio
nId
entifi
es th
e co
rrec
t use
of d
ashe
s fo
r an
embe
dded
cla
use.
58G
ram
mar
Iden
tifies
the
use
of a
par
ticip
le a
s an
adj
ectiv
e in
a c
ompl
ex s
ente
nce.
54 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
3 N
um
era
cy
Que
stio
n S
hort
Des
crip
tion
Cur
ricu
lum
A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1H
ere
are
som
e ch
erri
es.
NM
atch
es a
n ex
pres
sion
to a
num
ber p
robl
em
2M
aya
is c
ount
ing
dow
nA
FPC
ontin
ues
a si
mpl
e de
crea
sing
num
ber p
atte
rn
3W
hich
toy
is th
e ch
eape
st?
NId
entifi
es th
e sm
alle
st n
umbe
r in
a gr
oup
4Th
ree
team
s pl
ayed
a g
ame.
MC
DC
alcu
late
s th
e su
m o
f thr
ee ta
llies
5A
bout
how
long
is th
e na
il?M
CD
Estim
ates
the
leng
th o
f a n
ail a
gain
st a
rule
r
6Ja
n dr
ew th
is p
ictu
reS
Iden
tifies
the
seco
nd lo
wes
t obj
ect i
n a
pict
ure
7Si
mon
has
this
jar.
MC
DId
entifi
es th
e nu
mbe
r of o
bjec
ts th
at a
re th
e sa
me
size
in a
pic
ture
8W
hat s
hape
is m
issi
ngS
Iden
tifies
a m
issi
ng p
uzzl
e pi
ece
9W
hich
arr
ow p
oint
s N
Iden
tifies
the
mid
poin
t of a
sec
tion
on a
num
ber l
ine
10W
hich
of t
hese
giv
esN
Use
s pl
ace
valu
e to
det
erm
ine
the
larg
est n
umbe
r
11Th
is g
rid
show
s a
patte
rn.
SId
entifi
es th
e m
issi
ng e
lem
ent i
n sh
ape
patte
rn
12Be
lla in
vite
d so
me
frie
nds
NSo
lves
a w
ord
prob
lem
usi
ng a
dditi
on
13Fo
ur c
hild
ren
has
som
e st
icke
rsM
CD
Inte
rpre
ts in
form
atio
n in
a p
ictu
re g
raph
14Th
is w
oode
n do
ll is
mad
e fr
omS
Iden
tifies
a sp
here
15Te
rri h
ad $
18.
NSo
lves
a si
mpl
e di
visi
on w
ord
prob
lem
16A
shed
has
a w
indo
wS
Iden
tifies
the
refle
ctio
n of
a 2
D sh
ape
17Ja
son'
s bi
rthd
ay is
on
the
MC
DD
eter
min
es th
e da
y of
the
wee
k of
a d
ate
beyo
nd th
e in
form
atio
n sh
own
on c
alen
dar
18Ta
ra's
book
has
96
page
s.N
Solv
es a
num
ber p
robl
em in
volv
ing
subt
ract
ion
19H
ow m
any
face
sS
Det
erm
ines
the
num
ber o
f fac
es o
n a
solid
20W
hat t
ime
is sh
own
MC
DC
onve
rts
digi
tal t
ime
to w
ords
21Ja
ck, D
avid
, Sam
and
Tim
NO
rder
s fo
ur d
igit
who
le n
umbe
rs
22K
im h
as o
nly
thes
e co
ins.
NU
ses
addi
tion
and
subt
ract
ion
of d
ecim
al n
umbe
rs in
volv
ing
mon
ey
23Th
ese
five
stud
ents
SU
ses
sim
ple
posi
tiona
l lan
guag
e (r
ight
/lef
t) to
sol
ve a
pro
blem
55NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
24W
hich
of t
hese
is c
lose
stM
CD
Iden
tifies
the
appr
opri
ate
estim
ate
of m
ass
of a
litr
e of
milk
25A
Yea
r 3 c
lass
NU
ses
subt
ract
ion
and
addi
tion
to s
olve
an
equa
lize
prob
lem
26Th
is p
rism
is m
ade
MC
DC
alcu
late
s th
e vo
lum
e of
a st
ack
of c
ubes
27Th
e sc
ales
are
bal
ance
d.M
CD
Iden
tifies
the
light
est f
ruit
in g
raph
ic o
f bal
ance
sca
les
28Ro
y m
ade
a pa
ttern
by
addi
ngA
FPD
eter
min
es th
e se
quen
ce o
f num
bers
in a
n ad
ditio
n pa
ttern
2919
+ _
+ 8
= 4
5A
FPC
alcu
late
s th
e m
issi
ng n
umbe
r in
an a
dditi
on e
quat
ion
30R
hys
had
4 fis
h ta
nks.
NId
entifi
es e
quiv
alen
t way
s to
gro
up a
num
ber o
f ite
ms
into
diff
eren
t siz
ed g
roup
s
31Fo
ur fr
iend
s w
ere
tryi
ngM
CD
Inte
rpre
ts a
pic
ture
gra
ph a
nd c
alcu
late
s th
e di
ffer
ence
32Tw
o pi
neap
ples
are
on
a sc
ale.
MC
DRe
ads
a sc
ale
to d
eter
min
e th
e m
ass
of o
bjec
t
33Fi
ve c
hild
ren
wer
e pl
ayin
gN
Solv
es a
two-
step
num
ber p
robl
em
34Th
is is
a fl
oor p
lan
SIn
terp
rets
a fl
oor p
lan
and
iden
tifies
pat
hway
s
35A
shop
is s
ellin
g ju
ice
NC
alcu
late
s th
e la
rges
t num
ber o
f ite
ms
that
can
be
boug
ht g
iven
the
pric
es fo
r pac
ks o
f diff
eren
t siz
es
KE
Y
AFP
= A
lgeb
ra, f
unct
ion
and
pat
tern
(Str
uctu
re)
N =
Num
ber
MC
D =
Mea
sure
men
t, ch
ance
and
dat
aS
= S
pace
56 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
5 N
um
era
cy
Que
stio
n S
hort
Des
crip
tion
Cur
ricu
lum
A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1Bi
ll ro
lled
a nu
mbe
rN
Iden
tifies
a n
umbe
r tha
t is
odd
and
less
than
5
2Th
ree
team
s pl
ayed
a g
ame.
MC
DC
alcu
late
s th
e su
m o
f thr
ee ta
llies
3W
hich
arr
ow p
oint
s to
the
NId
entifi
es th
e m
idpo
int o
f a s
ectio
n on
a n
umbe
r lin
e
4H
ere
is a
sea
ting
plan
SU
ses
an a
lpha
num
eric
gri
d to
loca
te a
pos
ition
5W
hat n
umbe
r is
10 le
ssN
Subt
ract
s 10
from
a th
ree-
digi
t num
ber
6Th
is sh
ape
is c
ut o
utS
Sele
cts
the
obje
ct th
at m
atch
es a
giv
en n
et
73
x ?
= 57
AFP
Cal
cula
tes
the
mis
sing
num
ber i
n a
mul
tiplic
atio
n eq
uatio
n
8Jil
l set
up
a st
all
MC
DId
entifi
es th
e la
bels
for e
ach
colu
mn
in a
bar
gra
ph b
y m
atch
ing
the
appr
opri
ate
data
set
9Ja
son'
s bi
rthd
ay is
on
MC
DD
eter
min
es th
e da
y of
the
wee
k of
a d
ate
beyo
nd th
e in
form
atio
n sh
own
on a
cal
enda
r
10Th
is is
a v
iew
of a
sol
idS
Det
erm
ines
the
num
ber o
f cub
es h
idde
n fr
om v
iew
11Th
is b
ox h
as s
ome
colo
ured
MC
DD
eter
min
es le
ast l
ikel
y ou
tcom
e in
sim
ple
chan
ce e
vent
12Sa
lly p
aste
d so
me
cut-o
uts
SId
entifi
es a
pai
r of i
rreg
ular
shap
es th
at a
re th
e sa
me
13Ja
ck, D
avid
, Sam
and
Tim
NO
rder
s fo
ur-d
igit
who
le n
umbe
rs
14Ro
y m
ade
a pa
ttern
AFP
Det
erm
ines
a s
eque
nce
of n
umbe
rs in
an
addi
tion
patte
rn
15Th
is ta
ble
show
s m
ovie
MC
DU
ses
elap
sed
time
to id
entif
y in
form
atio
n fr
om a
tabl
e
16D
an h
ad 6
2 bl
ocks
.A
FPSo
lves
a d
ivis
ion
prob
lem
giv
en th
e di
vide
nd, q
uotie
nt a
nd re
mai
nder
17A
frac
tion
of th
is c
ircl
eN
Iden
tifies
equ
ival
ent f
ract
ions
in g
raph
ical
form
18K
evin
use
d th
ese
scal
esM
CD
Read
s a
mea
sure
men
t on
a se
t of s
cale
s
19Be
lla h
ad $
10.
NC
alcu
late
s th
e am
ount
of c
hang
e us
ing
mul
tiplic
atio
n an
d su
btra
ctio
n
20W
hich
of t
hese
ang
les
MC
DId
entifi
es a
righ
t ang
le in
a d
iagr
am
2119
+ _
+ 8
= 4
5A
FPC
alcu
late
s th
e m
issi
ng n
umbe
r in
an a
dditi
on e
quat
ion
22A
llen'
s ho
use
was
bui
lt in
193
6.N
App
roxi
mat
es a
dur
atio
n of
tim
e in
yea
rs
57NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
23R
hys
had
4 fis
h ta
nks.
NId
entifi
es e
quiv
alen
t way
s to
gro
up a
num
ber o
f ite
ms
into
diff
eren
t siz
ed g
roup
s
24W
hich
of t
hese
shap
es is
SId
entifi
es a
shap
e no
t sho
wn
in a
pic
ture
25W
hich
of t
hese
pai
rs o
f nu
mbe
rsN
Cal
cula
tes
the
diff
eren
ce b
etw
een
two
2-di
git n
umbe
rs
26Fo
ur fr
iend
s w
ere
tryi
ngM
CD
Inte
rpre
ts a
pic
ture
gra
ph a
nd c
alcu
late
s th
e di
ffer
ence
27W
hich
of t
hese
is th
e ne
t of a
3D
SId
entifi
es th
e ne
t of a
n ob
ject
with
a g
iven
num
ber o
f edg
es
28W
hat n
umbe
r doe
s th
eN
Iden
tifies
a p
oint
on
a nu
mbe
r lin
e gi
ven
two
refe
renc
e po
ints
29M
ary
is fa
cing
nor
th-w
est.
SD
eter
min
es a
com
pass
dir
ectio
n af
ter a
qua
rter
turn
30W
hich
one
of t
hese
shap
esM
CD
Iden
tifies
the
shap
e w
ith th
e la
rges
t per
imet
er
31Jo
e's to
y ca
rM
CD
Det
erm
ines
how
man
y tim
es lo
nger
one
obj
ect i
s th
an a
noth
er u
sing
con
vers
ion
of u
nits
32Th
is is
a fl
oor p
lan
SIn
terp
rets
a fl
oor p
lan
and
iden
tifies
pat
hway
s
33M
ia m
ade
a pl
aylis
t with
two
song
s.M
CD
Cal
cula
tes
elap
sed
time
usin
g co
nver
sion
of u
nits
34Ja
ke a
nd S
ara
pick
ed a
tota
lA
FPSo
lves
a tw
o st
ep w
ord
prob
lem
giv
en th
e su
m a
nd d
iffer
ence
of t
wo
num
bers
35Je
ss sp
ent $
12.3
0N
Cal
cula
tes
the
unit
pric
e of
an
item
36Th
is is
a d
iagr
am o
f a
scho
olya
rd.
MC
DC
alcu
late
s th
e ar
ea o
f a c
ompo
site
shap
e
37C
arla
mad
e a
lette
r 'C
'M
CD
Cal
cula
tes
the
peri
met
er o
f a c
ompo
site
shap
e
38C
aleb
refle
cts
one
ofS
Use
s pr
oper
ties
of 2
D sh
apes
to v
isua
lize
the
resu
lt of
a re
flect
ion
39A
shop
is s
ellin
g ju
ice
boxe
sN
Cal
cula
tes
the
larg
est n
umbe
r of i
tem
s th
at c
an b
e bo
ught
giv
en th
e pr
ices
for p
acks
of d
iffer
ent s
izes
40Zo
e w
as m
akin
g a
scal
eS
Use
s a
scal
ed d
raw
ing
to d
eter
min
e th
e he
ight
KE
Y
AFP
= A
lgeb
ra, f
unct
ion
and
pat
tern
(Str
uctu
re)
N =
Num
ber
MC
D =
Mea
sure
men
t, ch
ance
and
dat
aS
= S
pace
58 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
7 N
um
era
cy (
No
n-C
alc
ula
tor)
Que
stio
n S
hort
Des
crip
tion
Cur
ricu
lum
Are
aS
kill
asse
ssed
1Th
is sh
ape
is c
ut o
utS
Sele
cts
the
obje
ct th
at m
atch
es a
giv
en n
et
2M
ike
jum
ped
from
the
star
tN
Des
crib
es a
leng
th u
sing
a fr
actio
n of
a m
etre
33
x ?
= 57
AFP
Cal
cula
tes
the
mis
sing
num
ber i
n a
mul
tiplic
atio
n eq
uatio
n
4Th
is is
a v
iew
of a
sol
idS
Det
erm
ines
the
num
ber o
f cub
es h
idde
n fr
om v
iew
5Be
lla h
ad $
10.
NC
alcu
late
s th
e am
ount
of c
hang
e us
ing
mul
tiplic
atio
n an
d su
btra
ctio
n
6Th
is ta
ble
show
s a
patte
rn.
AFP
Cal
cula
tes
the
mis
sing
num
ber i
n an
add
ition
pat
tern
in a
tabl
e
7W
hich
of t
hese
ang
les
MC
DId
entifi
es a
righ
t ang
le in
a d
iagr
am
8Th
ere
wer
e 40
00 p
eopl
eN
Cal
cula
tes
a fr
actio
n of
a q
uant
ity
9Th
is sp
inne
r is
spun
MC
DSe
lect
s th
e m
ost l
ikel
y ev
ent f
rom
2 sp
ins
with
a sp
inne
r
10So
me
tiles
are
mis
sing
SId
entifi
es th
e m
issi
ng p
art o
f a sy
mm
etri
cal d
esig
n
11Br
ad w
as tr
ying
to d
raw
SId
entifi
es a
n in
corr
ect f
ace
in a
net
12A
llen'
s ho
use
was
bui
lt in
19
36.
NA
ppro
xim
ates
the
dura
tion
of ti
me
in y
ears
13So
me
stud
ents
wer
e gi
ven
MC
DIn
terp
rets
dat
a in
a p
ie g
raph
14Ja
mes
wan
ts to
buy
NC
alcu
late
s th
e pe
rcen
tage
dis
coun
t
15_
= 6
AFP
Det
erm
ines
the
valu
e of
a sy
mbo
l in
an in
form
al e
quat
ion
16Si
enna
is u
sing
a
250-
mill
ilitr
eM
CD
Cho
oses
an
expr
essi
on to
sol
ve a
mea
sure
men
t pro
blem
17M
ary
is fa
cing
nor
th-w
est.
SD
eter
min
es a
com
pass
dir
ectio
n af
ter a
qua
rter
turn
18Th
is ta
ble
show
s th
e pr
ices
NC
alcu
late
s un
it pr
ice
to d
eter
min
e th
e be
st b
uy
19Jo
e's to
y ca
r is
5 cm
long
.M
CD
Det
erm
ines
how
man
y tim
es lo
nger
one
obj
ect i
s th
an a
noth
er u
sing
con
vers
ion
of u
nits
20Ja
ne is
repe
atin
g 4
sym
bols
AFP
Iden
tifies
the
nth
shap
e in
a re
peat
ing
patte
rn o
f sha
pes
21Sa
njee
t put
two
iden
tical
MC
DSo
lves
a le
ngth
pro
blem
usi
ng sy
mm
etry
22St
uart
mad
e a
phon
e ca
llN
Estim
ates
cos
t us
ing
a ra
te, c
ents
per
min
ute
23Sa
sha
shar
ed 2
0 m
uesl
iA
FPFo
rmul
ates
equ
atio
ns to
sol
ve a
pro
blem
24C
arla
mad
e a
lette
r 'C
'M
CD
Cal
cula
tes
the
peri
met
er o
f a c
ompo
site
shap
e
59NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
25G
raem
e sp
ent $
45 a
t a p
ost
offic
e.N
Solv
es a
mul
tiple
-ste
p pr
oble
m in
volv
ing
tota
l and
uni
t cos
t
26A
stan
dard
six-
side
d di
ceM
CD
Cal
cula
tes
the
prob
abili
ty o
f an
even
t inv
olvi
ng fa
ctor
s
27Zo
e w
as m
akin
g a
scal
eS
Use
s a
scal
ed d
raw
ing
to d
eter
min
e th
e ac
tual
hei
ght
28W
hich
two
odd
num
bers
NFi
nds t
wo
odd
fact
ors o
f a th
ree-
digi
t num
ber
29A
nn a
rriv
ed a
t Wic
kham
St
atio
nM
CD
Inte
rpre
ts a
tim
etab
le
30W
hich
of t
hese
is n
ot e
qual
AFP
Iden
tifies
equ
ival
ent n
umbe
r exp
ress
ions
31A
li ha
d a
solid
pri
smS
Det
erm
ines
the
num
ber o
f fac
es o
f a p
rism
32W
esle
y ha
s th
ree
times
NSo
lves
a m
ulti-
step
pro
blem
invo
lvin
g m
ultip
licat
ion
KE
Y
AFP
= A
lgeb
ra, f
unct
ion
and
pat
tern
(Str
uctu
re)
N =
Num
ber
MC
D =
Mea
sure
men
t, ch
ance
and
dat
aS
= S
pace
60 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
7 N
um
era
cy (
Ca
lcu
lato
r)
Que
stio
n S
hort
Des
crip
tion
Cur
ricu
lum
A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1Th
is is
a st
reet
map
.S
Estim
ates
the
dist
ance
on
map
usi
ng th
e sc
ale
of th
e ke
y
2Br
ian
mad
e th
is 3
DS
Iden
tifies
a s
olid
with
hal
f the
vol
ume
of a
giv
en s
olid
3Fr
an m
akes
$72
sel
ling
NC
alcu
late
s an
am
ount
usi
ng u
nit c
osts
4A
regu
lar p
enta
gon
is c
utS
Use
s pr
oper
ties
of sh
ape
to id
entif
y a
2D sh
ape
5So
me
eggs
hav
e be
en
rem
oved
ND
eter
min
es th
e fr
actio
n of
a c
olle
ctio
n
6W
hich
tria
ngle
has
an
area
MC
DU
ses
a gr
id to
com
pare
the
area
s of
tria
ngle
s
7W
hich
one
of t
hese
num
bers
NId
entifi
es a
fact
or o
f num
ber
8Th
is g
raph
show
s da
ta
MC
DIn
terp
rets
a h
isto
gram
to fi
nd th
e fr
eque
ncy
of s
ever
al c
ateg
orie
s
9Th
is is
Don
na's
left
shoe
.S
Iden
tifies
the
mir
ror i
mag
e of
an
obje
ct
10Th
ere
are
12 a
pple
s an
d 7
pear
sN
Expr
esse
s a
quan
tity
as a
per
cent
age
11W
hich
one
of t
hese
has
the
sam
eA
FPId
entifi
es a
n eq
uiva
lent
exp
ress
ion
usin
g sq
uare
s, m
ultip
licat
ion
and
divi
sion
12D
ress
size
s in
Aus
tral
iaA
FPId
entifi
es a
rule
con
nect
ing
pair
s of
num
bers
in a
n ad
ditiv
e pa
ttern
13W
hich
of t
he fo
llow
ing
NO
rder
s fr
actio
ns a
nd d
ecim
als
in a
scen
ding
ord
er
14A
con
cert
star
ts a
t 10:
28 a
mM
CD
Cal
cula
tes
finis
hing
tim
e gi
ven
star
t tim
e an
d du
ratio
n
15Ti
m h
as tw
o la
rge
boxe
sA
FPId
entifi
es a
num
ber e
xpre
ssio
n w
hich
mod
els
the
solu
tion
to a
wor
d pr
oble
m
16Th
e di
agra
m sh
ows
SC
alcu
late
s th
e si
ze o
f an
angl
e in
an
isos
cele
s tr
iang
le
17A
hmed
had
a b
oxM
CD
Cal
cula
tes
the
prob
abili
ty o
f an
even
t
18A
rect
angl
e ha
s a
leng
thM
CD
Use
s pr
oper
ties
of a
squ
are
to d
eter
min
e its
side
leng
ths
19C
ontin
ent /
Num
ber o
f car
s pr
oduc
edN
Inte
rpre
ts a
tabl
e to
sol
ve a
mul
tiple
-ste
p pr
oble
m in
volv
ing
larg
e nu
mbe
rs, a
dditi
on a
nd su
btra
ctio
n
20A
n un
know
n nu
mbe
r is
adde
d to
4.
AFP
Form
ulat
es a
n eq
uatio
n to
sol
ve a
n un
know
n nu
mbe
r pro
blem
21M
s H
ogan
has
mor
e th
an 2
0A
FPU
ses
divi
sion
with
rem
aind
er fa
cts
to s
olve
a w
ord
prob
lem
22?
+ 3/
4 =
11/4
AFP
Find
s th
e va
lue
of u
nkno
wn
in a
equ
atio
n in
volv
ing
sim
ple
frac
tions
61NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
23W
hich
of t
hese
cou
ld b
e us
edM
CD
Sele
cts
a nu
mer
ical
exp
ress
ion
for t
he a
rea
of a
com
posi
te sh
ape
24R
ache
l liv
es 2
km
from
NSo
lves
a w
ord
prob
lem
invo
lvin
g a
rate
, dis
tanc
e pe
r hou
r
25Th
is ta
ble
show
s th
e af
ter-
scho
olM
CD
Inte
rpre
ts d
ata
from
a ta
bles
invo
lvin
g ov
erla
ppin
g ca
tego
ries
26Si
mon
is fa
cing
wes
t.S
Use
s co
mpa
ss d
irec
tions
and
mea
sure
of t
urn
to d
escr
ibe
posi
tion
27D
avid
dre
w th
is d
iagr
amS
Cal
cula
tes a
leng
th fr
om a
scal
e dr
awin
g
28Sa
rah
was
col
lect
ing
mon
eyN
Use
s pr
opor
tiona
l rea
soni
ng to
sol
ve a
pro
blem
invo
lvin
g th
e di
ffer
ence
bet
wee
n tw
o pe
rcen
tage
s
29Li
n is
sev
en y
ears
AFP
Form
ulat
es a
n eq
uatio
n to
sol
ve a
mul
ti-st
ep w
ord
prob
lem
invo
lvin
g di
ffer
ence
bet
wee
n w
hole
num
bers
30Sq
uare
s w
ith si
des
2 cm
MC
DC
alcu
late
s th
e vo
lum
e of
a b
ox m
ade
from
rem
ovin
g sq
uare
s fr
om th
e co
rner
s of
a re
ctan
gle
31M
ark
has
a sq
uare
pho
toN
Det
erm
ines
the
scal
e fa
ctor
requ
ired
for a
n en
larg
emen
t
32In
the
diag
ram
AB
SA
pplie
s pr
oper
ties
of sh
apes
and
ang
le p
rope
rtie
s to
det
erm
ine
the
size
of a
n an
gle
KE
Y
AFP
= A
lgeb
ra, f
unct
ion
and
pat
tern
(Str
uctu
re)
N =
Num
ber
MC
D =
Mea
sure
men
t, ch
ance
and
dat
aS
= S
pace
62 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
9 N
um
era
cy (
No
n-C
alc
ula
tor)
Que
stio
n S
hort
Des
crip
tion
Cur
ricu
lum
A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1Th
is ta
ble
show
s a
patte
rn.
AFP
Cal
cula
tes
the
mis
sing
num
ber i
n an
add
ition
pat
tern
in a
tabl
e
2Lu
ca h
ad a
$10
vou
cher
AFP
Iden
tifies
an
expr
essi
on in
volv
ing
rule
of o
rder
to s
olve
a w
ord
prob
lem
3Th
is sp
inne
r is
spun
twic
e.M
CD
Sele
cts
the
mos
t lik
ely
even
t fro
m 2
spin
s w
ith a
spin
ner
4So
me
tiles
are
mis
sing
from
SId
entifi
es th
e m
issi
ng p
art o
f a sy
mm
etri
cal d
esig
n
5Th
is g
raph
show
s th
e hi
stor
yM
CD
Inte
rpre
ts in
form
atio
n fr
om p
oint
s on
a g
raph
6Br
ad w
as tr
ying
to d
raw
SId
entifi
es a
n in
corr
ect f
ace
on a
net
75
x 2
= ?
NC
alcu
late
s a
prod
uct w
hich
incl
udes
a c
ubic
pow
er
8_
= 6
AFP
Det
erm
ines
the
valu
e of
a sy
mbo
l in
an in
form
al e
quat
ion
9A
nn w
as d
raw
ing
SId
entifi
es a
pai
r of p
oint
s th
at fo
rm a
n ed
ge o
f a p
rism
10W
hat i
s th
e be
st e
stim
ate
MC
DEs
timat
es th
e ca
paci
ty o
f a m
ug
11W
hich
of t
he fo
llow
ing
AFP
Mat
ches
the
shap
e of
a ti
me/
dist
ance
line
gra
ph to
the
appr
opri
ate
data
12W
hich
of t
hese
pro
pert
ies
SId
entifi
es a
pro
pert
y of
a tr
apez
ium
13W
hich
exp
ress
ion
is e
qual
AFP
Sim
plifi
es a
n al
gebr
aic
expr
essi
on in
volv
ing
like
term
s
14Be
n an
d Le
e w
ere
play
ing
NC
alcu
late
s th
e di
ffer
ence
bet
wee
n a
nega
tive
inte
ger a
nd a
pos
itive
inte
ger
15Sa
njee
t put
two
iden
tical
MC
DSo
lves
a le
ngth
pro
blem
usi
ng sy
mm
etry
16St
uart
mad
e a
phon
e ca
llN
Estim
ates
cos
t us
ing
a ra
te, c
ents
per
min
ute
17W
hich
of t
hese
is th
e cl
oses
tN
Iden
tifies
the
deci
mal
that
is th
e cl
oses
t to
0
18R
ani d
raw
s an
d la
bels
SU
ses
prop
ertie
s of
a p
aral
lelo
gram
to d
eter
min
e th
e co
ordi
nate
s of
a p
oint
on
a C
arte
sian
pla
ne
19N
ick
wor
ks in
a fa
ctor
yN
Use
s pr
opor
tiona
l rea
soni
ng to
find
a to
tal
20A
stan
dard
six-
side
d di
ceM
CD
Cal
cula
tes
the
prob
abili
ty o
f an
even
t inv
olvi
ng fa
ctor
s
21Si
mpl
ify:
NSi
mpl
ifies
a c
ompl
ex e
xpre
ssio
n in
volv
ing
indi
ces
63NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
22Sa
ndra
is u
sing
a c
ompu
ter
SIn
fers
the
shap
e dr
awn
from
thre
e ex
ampl
es g
iven
thre
e pa
ram
eter
s
23It
take
s 5
hour
s fo
r 4 p
eopl
eN
App
lies
a ra
te to
cal
cula
te a
rela
ted
quan
tity
24Ti
lly m
ade
a nu
mbe
r pat
tern
AFP
Iden
tifies
and
con
tinue
s a
num
ber p
atte
rn, g
iven
a ru
le
25In
a g
roup
of Y
ear 9
st
uden
ts,
AFP
Solv
es a
wor
d pr
oble
m in
volv
ing
ratio
26x/
2 =
3/11
AFP
Solv
es a
n eq
uatio
n in
volv
ing
frac
tions
27A
regu
lar h
exag
on h
as a
pe
rim
eter
MC
DC
alcu
late
s th
e pe
rim
eter
of a
shap
e us
ing
the
prop
ertie
s of
equ
ilate
ral t
rian
gles
28Li
na d
rew
a li
ne w
ith
equa
tion
AFP
Det
erm
ines
the
poin
t of i
nter
sect
ion
of tw
o lin
es fr
om th
eir e
quat
ions
29A
squ
are
pool
for s
mal
lM
CD
Cal
cula
tes
the
capa
city
of s
quar
e pr
ism
30Th
e ar
ea o
f a re
ctan
gle
is 6
0M
CD
Com
pare
s th
e ar
eas
of re
ctan
gles
aft
er a
n en
larg
emen
t
31H
olly
cre
ated
a sh
ape
usin
gS
Use
s nu
mbe
r pat
tern
to c
alcu
late
the
peri
met
er o
f a s
erie
s of
com
posi
te sh
apes
32K
umi i
s 3/
4 th
e he
ight
of
Zac.
AFP
Solv
e a
wor
d pr
oble
m in
volv
ing
the
diff
eren
ce b
etw
een
two
frac
tions
KE
Y
AFP
= A
lgeb
ra, f
unct
ion
and
pat
tern
(Str
uctu
re)
N =
Num
ber
MC
D =
Mea
sure
men
t, ch
ance
and
dat
aS
= S
pace
64 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ye
ar
9 N
um
era
cy (
Ca
lcu
lato
r)
Que
stio
n S
hort
Des
crip
tion
Cur
ricu
lum
A
rea
Ski
ll as
sess
ed
1Br
ian
mad
e th
is 3
D o
bjec
tS
Iden
tifies
a s
olid
with
hal
f the
vol
ume
of a
giv
en s
olid
2W
hich
of t
hese
can
be
mea
sure
dM
CD
Iden
tifies
an
attr
ibut
e m
easu
red
in li
tres
3Th
is is
Don
na's
left
shoe
.S
Iden
tifies
the
mir
ror i
mag
e of
an
obje
ct
4y
= 2
x2 -
8A
FPSu
bstit
utes
a v
alue
into
an
equa
tion
to fi
nd a
n un
know
n
5Th
e sp
eed
of s
ound
at s
eaM
CD
Con
vert
s a
rate
in m
etre
s pe
r sec
ond
to m
etre
s pe
r min
ute
6W
hat i
s th
e va
lue
ofN
Eval
uate
s an
exp
ress
ion
invo
lvin
g de
cim
al d
ivis
ion
7A
car
dboa
rd b
ox is
in th
e sh
ape
MC
DEs
timat
es th
e nu
mbe
r of c
ubes
nee
ded
to fi
ll a
box
8O
ne b
illio
n is
one
thou
sand
m
illio
n.N
Expr
esse
s a
num
ber u
sing
sci
entifi
c no
tatio
n
9Th
ere
are
12 a
pple
sN
Expr
esse
s a
quan
tity
as a
per
cent
age
10W
hich
one
of t
hese
has
the
sam
eA
FPId
entifi
es a
n eq
uiva
lent
exp
ress
ion
usin
g sq
uare
s, m
ultip
licat
ion
and
divi
sion
11A
con
cert
star
ts a
t 10:
28 a
mM
CD
Cal
cula
tes
finis
hing
tim
e gi
ven
star
t tim
e an
d du
ratio
n
12Th
e di
agra
m sh
ows
an
isos
cele
sS
Cal
cula
tes
the
size
of a
n an
gle
in a
n is
osce
les
tria
ngle
13Th
e pe
trol
gau
ge in
Lyn
's ca
rA
FPC
alcu
late
s vo
lum
e us
ing
a ra
te, c
ents
per
litr
e
14Te
agan
and
Cal
eb c
olle
cted
m
oney
AFP
Iden
tifies
a p
air o
f num
bers
in a
tabl
e th
at s
atis
fy a
rule
15C
ontin
ent /
Num
ber o
f car
s pr
oduc
edN
Inte
rpre
ts a
tabl
e to
sol
ve a
mul
tiple
-ste
p pr
oble
m in
volv
ing
larg
e nu
mbe
rs, a
dditi
on a
nd su
btra
ctio
n
16M
ia d
rew
a sh
ape.
SId
entifi
es a
2D
shap
e fr
om a
list
of i
ts p
rope
rtie
s
17Si
mon
is fa
cing
wes
t.S
Use
s co
mpa
ss d
irec
tions
and
mea
sure
of t
urn
to d
escr
ibe
posi
tion
18Th
e eq
uatio
n 2y
+ 1
= x
AFP
Rear
rang
es a
line
ar e
quat
ion
to g
ive
y as
the
subj
ect
65NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
19W
hich
of t
he fo
llow
ing
has
the
sam
eN
Iden
tifies
the
equi
vale
nt fo
rm o
f a n
umbe
r with
a n
egat
ive
inde
x
20Th
e ru
le fo
r cal
cula
ting
the
pric
eA
FPU
ses
subs
titut
ion
to s
olve
a li
near
equ
atio
n
21D
avid
dre
w th
is d
iagr
amS
Cal
cula
tes
a le
ngth
from
a s
cale
dra
win
g
22Th
is s
and
timer
con
tain
s 59
5 g
MC
DSo
lves
a p
robl
em in
volv
ing
flow
rate
and
the
conv
ersi
on o
f tim
e un
its
23Sa
rah
was
col
lect
ing
mon
eyN
Use
s pr
opor
tiona
l rea
soni
ng to
sol
ve a
pro
blem
invo
lvin
g th
e di
ffer
ence
bet
wee
n tw
o pe
rcen
tage
s
24K
im u
ses
stic
ks to
mak
eA
FPId
entifi
es a
pat
tern
with
in a
tabl
e of
val
ues
to m
ake
a pr
edic
tion
25Th
e to
tal l
engt
h of
all
edge
sM
CD
Cal
cula
tes
the
volu
me
of a
cub
e gi
ven
the
sum
of i
ts e
dges
26W
hich
stat
emen
t is
alw
ays
true
?S
Sele
cts
the
true
stat
emen
t abo
ut th
e pr
oper
ties
of q
uadr
ilate
rals
27A
new
pow
er d
rill
was
on
sale
NSo
lves
a tw
o-st
ep p
robl
em in
volv
ing
perc
enta
ge d
isco
unt
28Th
e ed
ges
of G
reg'
s sw
imm
ing
MC
DSo
lves
a m
ulti-
step
pro
blem
invo
lvin
g pe
rim
eter
and
con
vers
ion
of u
nits
to c
alcu
late
cos
t
29W
hich
of t
hese
equ
atio
ns
repr
esen
tsA
FPId
entifi
es th
e fo
rmul
a of
a li
ne
30In
the
diag
ram
AB
SA
pplie
s pr
oper
ties
of sh
apes
and
ang
le p
rope
rtie
s to
det
erm
ine
the
size
of a
n an
gle
31Th
e pr
oduc
t of t
hree
di
ffer
ent w
hole
NC
alcu
late
s th
e la
rges
t sum
of t
hree
who
le n
umbe
rs g
iven
thei
r pro
duct
32Th
is sh
ape
was
form
ed b
y re
mov
ing
MC
DC
alcu
late
s th
e pe
rim
eter
of a
sec
tor o
f a c
ircl
e
KE
Y
AFP
= A
lgeb
ra, f
unct
ion
and
pat
tern
(Str
uctu
re)
N =
Num
ber
MC
D =
Mea
sure
men
t, ch
ance
and
dat
aS
= S
pace
66 NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Ap
pe
nd
ix 2
: N
AP
LA
N 2
015
Da
ta S
erv
ice
Re
po
rt S
um
ma
ry
Re
po
rt n
am
e
Re
po
rt f
un
cti
on
Re
po
rt c
rite
ria
Po
ssib
le u
ses
for
rep
ort
Sc
ho
ol S
um
ma
ry R
ep
ort
D
ispl
ays
natio
nal,
stat
e an
d sc
hool
re
sults
from
NA
PLA
N te
stin
g in
201
5.Re
port
s fo
r:•
a ye
ar le
vel
• gr
oups
of s
tude
nts
such
as
girl
s, bo
ys,
LBO
TE o
r ATS
I stu
dent
s.Re
port
s on
:•
Read
ing,
Wri
ting,
Spe
lling
, Gra
mm
ar
and
Punc
tuat
ion,
and
Num
erac
y.
• C
ompa
re th
e pe
rfor
man
ce o
f Yea
rs 3
, 5, 7
an
d 9
stud
ents
in th
e sc
hool
with
that
of
stud
ents
acr
oss
the
natio
n an
d th
e st
ate.
•
Com
pare
the
perf
orm
ance
of s
tude
nt
achi
evem
ent i
n on
e as
sess
men
t are
a w
ith
perf
orm
ance
in o
ther
are
as.
Gro
up
Su
mm
ary
Re
po
rtSu
mm
aris
es re
sults
for g
roup
s of
st
uden
ts in
Rea
ding
, Wri
ting,
Spe
lling
, G
ram
mar
and
Pun
ctua
tion,
and
N
umer
acy.
Repo
rts
for:
• a
year
leve
l•
indi
vidu
al c
lass
.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, W
ritin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
an
d Pu
nctu
atio
n, a
nd N
umer
acy.
• C
ompa
re th
e re
sults
of s
tude
nts
in th
e sc
hool
, cla
ss o
r gro
up w
ith n
atio
nal a
nd
stat
e re
sults
for e
ach
asse
ssm
ent a
rea.
• A
naly
se th
e re
sults
of t
he s
choo
l, cl
ass
or
grou
p w
ith re
spec
t to
gend
er, L
BOTE
and
A
TSI s
tatu
s in
eac
h as
sess
men
t are
a.
Ass
ess
me
nt
Are
a R
ep
ort
Sum
mar
ises
resu
lts b
y as
sess
men
t are
a or
dim
ensi
on fo
r gro
ups
of st
uden
ts
usin
g pe
rcen
tage
cor
rect
com
pari
sons
.
Repo
rts
for:
• a
year
leve
l•
indi
vidu
al c
lass
• ot
her g
roup
s of
stud
ents
such
as
girl
s, bo
ys, L
BOTE
or A
TSI s
tude
nts.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
and
Pu
nctu
atio
n, N
umbe
r, M
easu
rem
ent,
chan
ce a
nd d
ata,
Spa
ce a
nd S
truc
ture
(A
lgeb
ra, f
unct
ion
and
patte
rn).
• C
ompa
re th
e pe
rcen
tage
of q
uest
ions
an
swer
ed c
orre
ctly
by
the
scho
ol o
r se
lect
ed g
roup
in sp
ecifi
c as
sess
men
t ar
eas
and
dim
ensi
ons
with
cor
resp
ondi
ng
perc
enta
ges
for t
he st
ate.
• Id
entif
y ar
eas
whe
re th
ere
is a
sign
ifica
nt
diff
eren
ce b
etw
een
the
perc
enta
ge c
orre
ct
for t
he s
choo
l or s
elec
ted
grou
p an
d th
at
for t
he st
ate.
67NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Re
po
rt n
am
e
Re
po
rt f
un
cti
on
Re
po
rt c
rite
ria
Po
ssib
le u
ses
for
rep
ort
Wri
tin
g C
rite
ria
Re
po
rtSu
mm
aris
es g
roup
per
form
ance
s on
the
Wri
ting
test
. Bar
gra
phs
show
th
e W
ritin
g sc
ore
dist
ribu
tion
for
the
grou
p fo
r eac
h of
the
ten
crite
ria
agai
nst w
hich
the
Wri
ting
test
was
as
sess
ed.
Repo
rts
for:
• a
year
leve
l
• in
divi
dual
cla
ss
• ot
her g
roup
s of
stud
ents
such
as
girl
s,
bo
ys, L
BOTE
or A
TSI s
tude
nts.
Repo
rts
on:
• A
udie
nce,
Tex
t Str
uctu
re, I
deas
,
Pers
uasi
ve D
evic
es, V
ocab
ular
y,
C
ohes
ion,
Par
agra
phin
g, S
ente
nce
Stru
ctur
e, P
unct
uatio
n an
d Sp
ellin
g.
• C
ompa
re th
e di
stri
butio
n of
sch
ool s
core
s
w
ith th
e di
stri
butio
n of
nat
iona
l and
stat
e-
w
ide
scor
es fo
r eac
h of
the
ten
asse
ssed
wri
ting
crite
ria.
• Pr
ovid
e da
ta fo
r ana
lysi
ng st
uden
t wri
ting
by c
rite
rion
, and
iden
tify
area
s of
rela
tive
stre
ngth
or w
eakn
ess.
Ite
m A
na
lys
is R
ep
ort
Prov
ides
dis
trac
tor a
naly
sis,
incl
udin
g pe
rcen
tage
cor
rect
and
des
crip
tions
of
skill
ass
esse
d fo
r eac
h ite
m.
The
repo
rt c
an n
ow b
e ac
cess
ed b
oth
in ta
bula
r and
gra
phic
al fo
rmat
s.
Repo
rts
for:
• a
year
leve
l
• in
divi
dual
cla
ss
• ot
her g
roup
s of
stud
ents
such
as
girl
s,
bo
ys, L
BOTE
or A
TSI s
tude
nts.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
and
Punc
tuat
ion,
and
Num
erac
y.
Can
be
orde
red
by:
• Ite
m n
umbe
r
• %
cor
rect
Nat
iona
l
• %
cor
rect
Sta
te
• %
cor
rect
Gro
up
• Sk
ill.
• Fo
r eac
h te
st it
em, c
ompa
re th
e pe
rcen
tage
of st
uden
ts in
the
sele
cted
sch
ool
gr
oup
who
ans
wer
ed c
orre
ctly
with
the
corr
espo
ndin
g na
tiona
l and
stat
e
pe
rcen
tage
s.
• C
ompa
re th
e di
stri
butio
n of
resp
onse
s
fr
om st
uden
ts in
the
sele
cted
sch
ool
gr
oup
to e
ach
item
acr
oss
all a
ltern
ativ
es in
mul
tiple
cho
ice
item
s to
the
corr
espo
ndin
g
di
stri
butio
ns fo
r the
nat
ion
and
the
stat
e.
• Pr
ovid
e da
ta fo
r ana
lysi
ng p
artic
ular
area
s of
rela
tive
stre
ngth
or w
eakn
ess
for
in
divi
dual
stud
ents
or g
roup
s of
stud
ents
by d
imen
sion
or b
y sk
ill a
sses
sed.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 68
Re
po
rt n
am
e
Re
po
rt f
un
cti
on
Re
po
rt c
rite
ria
Po
ssib
le u
ses
for
rep
ort
Stu
de
nt
Re
spo
nse
Re
po
rtId
entifi
es c
orre
ct a
nd in
corr
ect
resp
onse
s to
indi
vidu
al it
ems
for e
ach
stud
ent i
n a
grou
p by
dim
ensi
on.
Sum
mar
ises
gro
up p
erfo
rman
ces
on
indi
vidu
al it
ems.
Repo
rts
for:
• an
indi
vidu
al st
uden
t•
a ye
ar le
vel
• in
divi
dual
cla
sses
• ot
her g
roup
s of
stud
ents
such
as
girl
s, bo
ys, L
BOTE
or A
TSI s
tude
nts.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
and
Pu
nctu
atio
n, a
nd N
umer
acy.
• Id
entif
y ite
ms
answ
ered
cor
rect
ly a
nd
inco
rrec
tly b
y in
divi
dual
stud
ents
.•
Iden
tify
patte
rns
of in
corr
ect r
espo
nses
for
indi
vidu
al st
uden
ts o
r gro
ups
of st
uden
ts
to h
ighl
ight
cur
ricu
lum
are
as w
hich
may
ne
ed a
ttent
ion.
• A
naly
se st
uden
t res
pons
es to
hel
p di
agno
se u
nder
stan
ding
of p
artic
ular
co
ncep
ts.
• P
rovi
de e
vide
nce
base
d in
form
atio
n to
he
lp te
ache
rs in
form
par
ents
abo
ut th
eir
child
’s gr
asp
of p
artic
ular
con
cept
s or
cu
rric
ulum
are
as.
Stu
de
nt
Ac
hie
vem
en
t L
eve
l Re
po
rtSu
mm
aris
es a
chie
vem
ent l
evel
s fo
r in
divi
dual
stud
ents
by
outc
omes
and
re
flect
s in
form
atio
n on
the
pare
nt
repo
rts.
This
can
be
in:
• gr
aphi
cal f
orm
at (b
ox p
lots
)
• ta
bula
r for
mat
(lis
ts n
umer
ic v
alue
s).
Repo
rts
for:
• an
indi
vidu
al st
uden
t•
a ye
ar le
vel
• in
divi
dual
cla
sses
• ot
her g
roup
s of
stud
ents
such
as
girl
s, bo
ys, L
BOTE
or A
TSI s
tude
nts.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, W
ritin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
an
d Pu
nctu
atio
n, a
nd N
umer
acy.
• C
ompa
re th
e ac
hiev
emen
t of i
ndiv
idua
l st
uden
ts a
cros
s al
l ass
essm
ent a
reas
.•
Iden
tify
whe
re in
divi
dual
stud
ents
’ res
ults
fit
with
resp
ect t
o th
e di
stri
butio
n of
re
sults
acr
oss
the
natio
n.•
Pro
vide
a su
bstit
ute
Stud
ent R
epor
t for
pa
rent
s if
requ
ired
. The
repo
rt m
ust b
e ru
n on
the
natio
nal s
cale
for “
All”
stud
ents
fo
r thi
s to
refle
ct th
e ac
tual
Stu
dent
Re
port
.
Fiv
e Y
ea
r T
ren
d R
ep
ort
Dis
play
s na
tiona
l, st
ate
and
scho
ol
resu
lts fo
r NA
PLA
N te
sts
over
tim
e (2
011
- 201
5).
Repo
rts
for:
• a
year
leve
l•
grou
ps o
f stu
dent
s su
ch a
s gi
rls,
boys
, LB
OTE
or A
TSI s
tude
nts.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, W
ritin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
an
d Pu
nctu
atio
n, a
nd N
umer
acy.
• C
ompa
re th
e di
stri
butio
n of
nat
iona
l, st
ate
and
scho
ol N
APL
AN
resu
lts o
ver t
ime
• C
ompa
re n
atio
nal,
stat
e an
d sc
hool
sca
led
scor
e m
eans
ove
r tim
e.
• Id
entif
y tr
ends
in n
atio
nal,
stat
e an
d sc
hool
NA
PLA
N re
sults
ove
r tim
e.
69NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Re
po
rt n
am
e
Re
po
rt f
un
cti
on
Re
po
rt c
rite
ria
Po
ssib
le u
ses
for
rep
ort
Sc
ho
ol C
om
pa
riso
n
Re
po
rtD
ispl
ays
2013
to 2
015
grow
th d
ata
at
natio
nal,
stat
e an
d sc
hool
leve
ls.
Incl
udes
a su
mm
ary
tabl
e sh
owin
g av
erag
e 20
13 -
2015
sca
led
scor
e di
ffer
ence
s at n
atio
nal,
stat
e an
d sc
hool
le
vels
.
Repo
rts
for:
• a
year
leve
l
• gr
oups
of s
tude
nts
such
as
girl
s, bo
ys,
LBO
TE o
r ATS
I stu
dent
s.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, W
ritin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
and
Punc
tuat
ion,
and
Num
erac
y.
• C
ompa
re th
e ch
ange
in p
erfo
rman
ce o
f the
sam
e co
hort
s of
stud
ents
bet
wee
n 20
13 a
nd
20
15 (i
.e. h
ow th
e pe
rfor
man
ce o
f Yea
r
3,
Yea
r 5 o
r Yea
r 7 st
uden
ts in
201
3
co
mpa
red
to th
eir c
urre
nt p
erfo
rman
ce in
Year
5, Y
ear 7
or Y
ear 9
in 2
015)
.
• In
vest
igat
e th
e ra
te o
f pro
gres
s of
a c
ohor
t
of st
uden
ts o
ver t
ime
rela
tive
to o
ther
stud
ents
in th
e st
ate
and
natio
nally
.
Sc
ho
ol–
Stu
de
nt
Co
mp
ari
so
n R
ep
ort
Dis
play
s 20
13 a
nd 2
015
resu
lts fo
r an
indi
vidu
al st
uden
t, w
ith re
spec
t to
corr
espo
ndin
g re
sults
at n
atio
nal,
stat
e an
d sc
hool
leve
ls.
Repo
rts
for i
ndiv
idua
l stu
dent
s co
mpa
red
to:
• al
l stu
dent
s or
• gr
oups
of s
tude
nts
such
as
girl
s, bo
ys,
LBO
TE o
r ATS
I stu
dent
s.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, W
ritin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
and
Punc
tuat
ion,
and
Num
erac
y.
• D
eter
min
e th
e ch
ange
in in
divi
dual
stud
ents
’ per
form
ance
bet
wee
n 20
13 a
nd
20
15 (i
.e. h
ow th
e st
uden
ts’ Y
ear 7
201
3
re
sults
com
pare
to th
eir p
erfo
rman
ce in
Year
9 in
201
5).
• D
eter
min
e a
stud
ent’s
rate
of p
rogr
ess
over
time
rela
tive
to o
ther
stud
ents
in th
e st
ate
and
natio
nally
.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 70
Re
po
rt n
am
e
Re
po
rt f
un
cti
on
Re
po
rt c
rite
ria
Po
ssib
le u
ses
for
rep
ort
Re
lati
ve
Gro
wth
Re
po
rtD
ispl
ays
2013
to 2
015
com
para
tive
grow
th (H
igh,
Med
ium
or L
ow) f
or
each
stud
ent w
ith re
spec
t to
‘sim
ilar
stud
ents
’ (th
ose
with
the
sam
e 20
13
scor
e).
The
repo
rt is
ava
ilabl
e in
:
• ta
bula
r for
mat
(lis
ts in
divi
dual
stud
ents
)
• gr
aphi
cal f
orm
at (p
rovi
des
sum
mar
y
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
per
cent
age
of
st
uden
ts in
eac
h gr
owth
cat
egor
y).
Repo
rts
for:
• al
l stu
dent
s
• in
divi
dual
cla
sses
• st
uden
ts fr
om a
sel
ecte
d gr
owth
cate
gory
.
Repo
rts
on:
• Re
adin
g, S
pelli
ng, G
ram
mar
and
Punc
tuat
ion,
and
Num
erac
y.
Can
be
orde
red
by:
• 20
13 st
uden
t sco
re
• 20
15 st
uden
t sco
re
• st
uden
t nam
e.
• C
ompa
re st
uden
t gro
wth
bet
wee
n N
APL
AN
test
ing
peri
ods
with
that
of
sim
ilar s
tude
nts.
• Id
entif
y if
ther
e ar
e pa
rtic
ular
stud
ent
abili
ty g
roup
s w
here
hig
h re
lativ
e gr
owth
ha
s be
en a
chie
ved
com
pare
d to
sim
ilar
stud
ents
.•
Iden
tify
if th
ere
are
part
icul
ar st
uden
ts
or st
uden
t abi
lity
grou
ps w
here
onl
y lo
w re
lativ
e gr
owth
has
bee
n ac
hiev
ed
com
pare
d to
sim
ilar s
tude
nts.
71NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide
Glossary
Data presentation
Scaled scores and the National Assessment Program scale
Nationally, student outcomes are provided as a scaled score. These scores range from 0 to 1000, and form the numeric continuum from which the ten national reporting bands are derived (see page 3).
Where appropriate, the NAPLAN Data Service displays summary statistics and individual student outcomes as scaled scores, and the distribution of results as box-and-whisker graphs plotted against the reporting bands.
• Year 3 - results will be reported in Band 1 to Band 6
• Year 5 - results will be reported in Band 3 to Band 8
• Year 7 - results will be reported in Band 4 to Band 9
• Year 9 - results will be reported in Band 5 to Band 10.
Box-and-whisker (box plot) format
Some NAPLAN reports use a box-and-whisker format to represent the range of student achievement in the specified criterion.
The shaded box represents the middle 50 per cent of the student scores for the particular group. The middle score (median) for the group is shown by the black bar.
The box plus line segments (whiskers) show the range of scores achieved by the middle 80 per cent of the group.
‘Percentile’ refers to ranking a group on a 0 to 100 (percentage) scale. Students in the 90th percentile will have a performance which is equal to or better than 90 per cent of the particular group to which the data refers.
Median
The median or mid-score (50th percentile) is the value where half the scores are above it and half below it (e.g. the median of 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18 is 14).
Mean
The mean (or average) is the total of scores for all members of the group divided by the number of members in that group (e.g. the mean of 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18 is 13).
Standard deviation
Standard deviation (SD) is a measure of the spread of scores around the mean. A larger SD indicates a wider spread of scores. The range of + or – one SD either side of the mean contains about 68 per cent of scores, and + or – two SDs either side of the mean contains about 95 per cent of scores.
NAPLAN 2015 Reporting Guide 72
Standard error (se) of the mean
Assessment results data is always subject to a degree of uncertainty, due to the fact that, for a variety of reasons, some students will do a little better or a little worse than they perhaps could have or should have on a single assessment. In very large groups, these fluctuations tend to average out, but in smaller groups they can be significant. The standard error (se) of the mean provides a measure of this uncertainty, and can be used to generate a confidence interval for the mean. A 95% confidence interval for the school mean is given by mean ± 2 x se(mean).