Upload
hoangdat
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I71
sEctiOn 3:
AnnExEs
3.1 mEthODOlOgy OF thE FiRst pERiODic REviEW
The methodology used for the first round of the Periodic Review in the Union of Myanmar employed several innovative approaches in order to provide useful data and analysis for decision makers. A key innovation was the use of a mixed-methods approach that combined a quantitative probability-sampled household survey with a qualitative purposively-sampled 'plug-in' investigation focusing on vulnerable groups.
3.1.1 QuAntitAtivE mEthODOlOgy
sAmplE DEsign
The Periodic Review assessed the same sampling area as the VTA, which was defined as the worst-affected Townships, but not the same communities. The definition of ‘affected’ used to select the Townships was the loss of life and / or property that had an impact on the livelihood of an individual, family or a community. It did not take into consideration the ability to cope with the damage and destruction.1 There were 30 Townships with this definition (see Annex 3.3 for the list).
The Periodic Review used a two-stage cluster sample design in which the primary sampling units were communities sampled from the affected area and the secondary sampling units were households within selected primary sampling units. Primary sampling units were selected using the Centric Systematic Area Sampling (CSAS) method. This method involves dividing the survey area into non-overlapping, equal, and contiguous areas and sampling the community located closest to the centre of each area. The advantages of using the CSAS method is that it provides a spatially-even sample of communities avoiding the bias towards sampling the most populous communities that is present in sampling methods such as population proportional sampling (PPS). When combined with a representative within-community sampling method, it allows spatial analysis and presentation of survey data.
It is common practice to use a square grid to define the areas used in CSAS samples. This was done in the VTA. A hexagonal grid was used in the Periodic Review because it yields a more spatially even sample than a square grid with neighbouring primary sampling units tending to be equidistant from each other in all directions.
To determine the location of the primary sampling units, a hexagonal grid was drawn onto a map of the survey area. The size of the hexagonal tiles used was determined by consideration of the need for spatial detail and a practicable number of primary sampling units. The side length of each hexagonal tile was six nautical miles (11.11 kilometres). With this side length, the distance between the centroids of neighbouring hexagonal tiles is 10.39 nautical miles (19.06 kilometres). 113 of these hexagonal tiles were required to cover the Periodic Review survey area. Post-Nargis satellite imagery was used to determine the community located closest to the centroids of the hexagonal tiles and 113 communities were selected as primary sampling units.
Within each selected community, households were selected using a map-segment-sample technique that is known to provide a representative sample of households from communities.2 The combination of an even spatial sample of primary sampling units (PSUs) and the use of a representative within-PSU sampling method allows spatial analysis techniques to be used and for results to be presented as maps.
1 TCG (June 2008), Post-Nargis Joint Assessment, p 35.2 A short guide to the Map-Segment-Sample community sampling method for the TCG Periodic Review.
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I72
inDicAtORs AnD QuEstiOnnAiRE
The assessment tools were created by identifying contributing variables for indicators identified in consultation with the health, food, nutrition, protection of women and children, water-sanitation-hygiene (WASH), agriculture, early recovery, education and shelter Clusters, and representatives of the Government of the Union of Myanmar. Indicators selected were to be part of the Early Recovery framework for the Cluster and were to monitor needs. Some indicators were used previously in well-developed monitoring assessments, such as questions from the Core Questions on Drinking-Water and Sanitation for the WASH Cluster. However, in some cases the questions were developed to fit the requirement of monitoring needs after a cyclone. Where possible, indicators were selected to be compared to the Village Tract Assessment. The tool was developed in English and translated into Myanmar, pre-tested in English and Myanmar, and further evaluated in a pilot survey.
sAmplE sizE, DAtA cOllEctiOn AnD DAtA AnAlysis
The planned overall sample size was 113 primary sampling units (PSUs) with 22 households sampled from each PSU. Data were collected between 29 October to 14 November 2008. The survey sampled 113 PSUs as planned, but five of these were censored due to improper recording of location data. The achieved sample size was, therefore, 108 PSUs with 22 households sampled from each PSU. Data were double entered and validated using a purpose written database system. Data were analysed and mapped using ordinary kriging.
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I73
DIVISION:
DISTRICT:
TOWNSHIP
WARD/ VILLAGE TRACT:
PCODE:
M M R
Date of Interview: Day Month Year
Time: Beginning of Interview Hour Minute
End of Interview Hour Minute
THE INFORMATION COLLECTED WILL BE USED ONLY FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND IS STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
myAnmAR pERiODic REviEW
hOusEhOlD QuEstiOnnAiRE©This document should not be replicated or othewise used without the advice and consent of the authors.
3.1.2 QuAntitAtivE AssEssmEnt tOOls
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I74
Name of Enumerator Code
Name of Supervisor Code
Name of Data Entry Operater 1 Code
Name of Data Entry Operator 2 Code
Verified: Verified by (name):
Yes 1
No 2
Hexagon No. Household No.
Name of Principal Respondent ID Code
Measure the length of the dwelling Measure the width of the dwelling
feet feet
Interview Outcome: Complete interview 1
Partial/incomplete interview 2
Refusal 3
Questionnaire of
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I75
DIV
ISIO
N:
DIS
TRIC
T:
TOW
NSH
IP
WARD
/ VIL
LAG
E T
RACT:
PCO
DE:
MM
R
Dat
e of
Inte
rvie
w:
Day
Mon
thYe
ar
Tim
e: Beg
innin
g o
f In
terv
iew
Hou
rM
inute
End o
f In
terv
iew
Hou
rM
inute
THE I
NFO
RM
ATI
ON
CO
LLECTE
D W
ILL
BE U
SED
ON
LY F
OR S
TATI
STI
CAL
PURPO
SES A
ND
IS S
TRIC
TLY
CO
NFI
DEN
TIAL
Nam
e of
Enum
erat
orCod
e
Nam
e of
Super
viso
rCod
e
Nam
e of
Dat
a Entr
y O
per
ater
1Cod
e
Nam
e of
Dat
a Entr
y O
per
ator
2Cod
e
Ver
ifi ed
:Ver
ifi ed
by
(nam
e):
Yes
1
No
2
Hex
agon
No.
Hou
sehol
d N
o.
Nam
e of
Princi
pal
Res
pon
den
tID
Cod
e
Mea
sure
the
length
of
the
dw
ellin
gM
easu
re t
he
wid
th o
f th
e dw
ellin
g
feet
feet
Inte
rvie
w O
utc
ome:
Com
ple
te inte
rvie
w1
Part
ial/
inco
mple
te inte
rvie
w2
Ref
usa
l3
Ques
tion
nai
reof
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
I D C O D E
Sta
rt w
ith t
he
all in
div
idual
s cu
rren
tly
livin
g in t
he
hou
sehol
d.
Th
en lis
t th
ose
who
lived
in t
he
hou
sehol
d
prior
to
Cyc
lone
Nar
gis
who
are
no
longer
in t
he
hou
sehol
d.
Was
this
per
son
livin
g in t
he
hou
sehol
d
prior
to
Cyc
lone
Nar
gis
?
Is t
his
per
son
curr
ently
livin
g in t
he
hou
sehol
d?
If t
his
per
son is
not
curr
ently
livin
g in
the
hou
sehol
d,
wher
e is
he
or s
he?
SEX:
AG
E
RECO
RD
AG
E
IN Y
EARS I
F PE
RSO
N I
S M
ORE
THAN
ON
E Y
EAR
OLD
. R
ECO
RD
AG
E I
N M
ON
THS
IF P
ERSO
N I
S
LESS T
HAN
ON
E
YEAR O
LD.
RELA
TIO
NSH
IP T
O H
EAD
:
HEAD
HEAD
1
SPO
USE/P
ARTN
ER
2
SO
N/D
AU
GH
TER
3
SO
N/D
AU
GH
TER-I
N-L
AW
4
FATH
ER/M
OTH
ER
5
FATH
ER-I
N-L
AW
/MO
THER-I
N-L
AW
6
SIS
TER/B
RO
THER
7
Anot
her
hou
sehol
d in s
ame
villa
ge
1G
RAN
DCH
ILD
8
Anot
her
vill
age/
city
in M
yanm
ar2
GRAN
DPA
REN
T9
Cou
ntr
y ou
tsid
e of
Mya
nm
ar3
NIE
CE/N
EPH
EW
10
Dea
d4
OTH
ER R
ELA
TIVE
11
YES 1
YES >
>5 1
Mis
sing
5M
ALE
1N
OT
RELA
TED
12
NO
2
NO
2D
on’t k
now
6FE
MALE
2YE
ARS
MO
NTH
SD
ON
’T K
NO
W13
NAM
E
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
mO
Du
lE 1
: h
Ou
sEh
OlD R
Os
tER
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I76
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
Doe
s th
e nat
ura
l fa
ther
of
[N
AM
E]
live
in t
his
hou
sehol
d?
Doe
s th
e nat
ura
l m
other
of
[NAM
E]
live
in t
his
hou
sehol
d?
What
is
the
ethnic
ity
of
[NAM
E]?
What
is
the
relig
ion
of [
NAM
E]?
ASK O
NLY
IF
PERSO
N I
S 1
5 Y
EARS O
LD O
R O
LDER
ASK O
NLY
IF
PERSO
N I
S 1
5 Y
EARS O
LD O
R O
LDER
What
was
the
mai
n a
ctiv
ity
that
[N
AM
E]
did
bef
ore
Nar
gis
?W
hat
is
the
mai
n a
ctiv
ity
that
[N
AM
E]
doe
s now
?
Gov
ernm
ent
emplo
yee
1G
over
nm
ent
emplo
yee
1
Farm
er2
Farm
er2
Fish
erm
an3
Fish
erm
an3
Shop
ow
ner
4Shop
ow
ner
4
Mya
nm
ar1
Gro
up lab
our
(bos
s or
mem
ber
)5
Gro
up lab
our
(bos
s or
mem
ber
)5
Shan
2Sal
t pro
duce
r6
Sal
t pro
duce
r6
Chin
3Sel
f em
plo
yed/c
raft
sman
/art
isan
7Sel
f em
plo
yed/c
raft
sman
/art
isan
7
IF Y
ES,
RECO
RD
TH
E
ID C
OD
E
IF Y
ES,
RECO
RD
TH
E
ID C
OD
E
Kac
hin
4D
ay lab
or/c
asual
lab
our
8D
ay lab
or/c
asual
lab
our
8
Kay
ah5
Buddhis
t1
Dom
estic
wor
ker
9D
omes
tic
wor
ker
9
Mon
6M
usl
im2
Go
to s
choo
l10
Go
to s
choo
l10
Kay
in7
Hin
du
3H
ouse
hol
d w
ork/
care
for
mem
ber
s11
Hou
sehol
d w
ork/
care
for
mem
ber
s11
Rak
hin
e8
Christ
ian
4Pe
tty
trad
e12
Pett
y tr
ade
12
Mix
ed9
Oth
er5
Live
stoc
k/pou
ltry
sel
lers
13
Live
stoc
k/pou
ltry
sel
lers
13
Oth
er10
Don
’t k
now
6N
one
14
Non
e14
Oth
er15
Oth
er15
ID C
OD
EID
CO
DE
Don
’t k
now
16
Don
’t k
now
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
I D C O D E
Write
the
nam
e of
any
child
who
is
15 y
ears
old
or
les
s an
d
curr
ently
livin
g in t
he
hou
sehol
d
from
the
Ros
ter
in t
he
corr
espon
din
g
line
with t
hei
r ID
Cod
e fr
om
the
Ros
ter
CH
ILD
REN
6 M
ON
TH
S O
LD O
R
YOU
NG
ER
CO
MPA
RE
TH
E H
EIG
HT
(OR L
EN
GTH
) O
F TH
E C
HIL
D
TO T
HE
MEASU
RIN
G
POLE
. D
ETERM
INE
IF T
HE
CH
ILD
'S
HEIG
HT (
OR
LEN
GTH
) IS
BETW
EEN
TH
E T
WO
M
ARKS.
CH
ILD
REN
WH
O A
RE S
UFF
ICIE
NT H
EIG
HT O
R L
EN
GTH
(25 t
o 43 I
Ns)
Is [
NAM
E]
curr
ently
bei
ng
bre
astf
ed?
Sin
ce y
este
rday
, did
[N
AM
E]
rece
ive
any
of
the
follo
win
g?
MEASU
RE
TH
E C
HIL
D’S
M
ID U
PPER
ARM
CIR
CU
M-
FEREN
CE O
N
TH
E L
EFT
ARM
AN
D W
RIT
E
DO
WN
TH
E
RAN
GE I
N
WH
ICH
TH
E
MEASU
REM
EN
T
IS F
OU
ND
IS
BIL
ATERAL
PITT
ING
O
ED
EM
A
PRESEN
T?
Did
[N
AM
E]
exer
ience
dia
rrhoe
a during t
he
last
14
day
s?
“How
did
you
tre
at [
NAM
E’S
] dia
rrhoe
a?LI
ST U
P TO
TH
REE M
ETH
OD
S”
Has
[N
AM
E]
had
a f
ever
in
the
last
14 d
ays?
Incr
ease
d f
ood o
r drink
giv
en t
o ch
ild1
(a)
(b)
Red
uce
d f
ood o
r liq
uid
giv
en t
o ch
ild2
Any
other
liq
uid
sSol
id o
r se
mi-
solid
(m
ush
y)
food
s
Gav
e sp
ecia
l fo
ods
to c
hild
3
Ora
l re
hyd
ration
ther
apy
4
Oth
er (
spec
ify)
5
Red
uce
or
stop
bre
astf
eedin
g6
RED
1H
ome
rem
edy
7
YES
1YES
1YES
1YES
1YELL
OW
2
YES
1
YES
1
No
trea
tmen
t8
YES
1
NO
2N
O
2
NO
2N
O>
>11
2G
REEN
3N
O
2
NO
2>
>9
NO
2
NAM
E
1st
2nd
3rd
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
mO
Du
lE 2
: c
hil
D m
OD
ulE
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I77
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
Doe
s th
e na
tura
l fat
her
of [
NAM
E]
live
in t
his
hous
ehol
d?
Doe
s th
e na
tura
l m
othe
r of
[N
AM
E]
live
in t
his
hous
ehol
d?
Wha
t is
the
et
hnic
ity
of
[NAM
E]?
Wha
t is
the
rel
igio
n of
[N
AM
E]?
ASK O
NLY
IF
PERSO
N I
S 1
5 YE
ARS O
LD O
R O
LDER
ASK O
NLY
IF
PERSO
N I
S 1
5 YE
ARS O
LD O
R O
LDER
Wha
t w
as t
he m
ain
activi
ty t
hat
[NAM
E] d
id b
efor
e N
argi
s?W
hat
is t
he m
ain
activi
ty t
hat
[NAM
E] d
oes
now
?
Gov
ernm
ent
empl
oyee
1G
over
nmen
t em
ploy
ee1
Farm
er2
Farm
er2
Fish
erm
an3
Fish
erm
an3
Sho
p ow
ner
4Sho
p ow
ner
4
Mya
nmar
1G
roup
labo
ur (
boss
or
mem
ber)
5G
roup
labo
ur (
boss
or
mem
ber)
5
Sha
n2
Sal
t pr
oduc
er6
Sal
t pr
oduc
er6
Chi
n3
Sel
f em
ploy
ed/c
raft
sman
/art
isan
7Sel
f em
ploy
ed/c
raft
sman
/art
isan
7
IF Y
ES,
REC
ORD
TH
E ID
CO
DE
IF Y
ES,
REC
ORD
TH
E ID
CO
DE
Kac
hin
4D
ay la
bor/
casu
al la
bour
8D
ay la
bor/
casu
al la
bour
8
Kay
ah5
Bud
dhis
t1
Dom
estic
wor
ker
9D
omes
tic
wor
ker
9
Mon
6M
uslim
2G
o to
sch
ool
10G
o to
sch
ool
10
Kay
in7
Hin
du3
Hou
seho
ld w
ork/
care
for
mem
bers
11H
ouse
hold
wor
k/ca
re for
mem
bers
11
Rak
hine
8Chr
istian
4Pe
tty
trad
e12
Pett
y tr
ade
12
Mix
ed9
Oth
er5
Live
stoc
k/po
ultr
y se
llers
13Li
vest
ock/
poul
try
selle
rs13
Oth
er10
Don
’t k
now
6N
one
14N
one
14
Oth
er15
Oth
er15
ID C
OD
EID
CO
DE
Don
’t k
now
16D
on’t k
now
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
I D C O D E
Write
the
na
me
of a
ny
child
who
is
15 y
ears
old
or
less
and
cu
rren
tly
livin
g in
the
ho
useh
old
from
the
Ros
ter
in t
he
corr
espo
ndin
g lin
e w
ith
thei
r ID
Cod
e fr
om
the
Ros
ter
CH
ILD
REN
6 M
ON
THS O
LD O
R
YOU
NG
ER
CO
MPA
RE
THE
HEI
GH
T (O
R L
ENG
TH)
OF
THE
CH
ILD
TO
TH
E M
EASU
RIN
G
POLE
. D
ETER
MIN
E IF
TH
E CH
ILD
'S
HEI
GH
T (O
R
LEN
GTH
) IS
BET
WEE
N
THE
TWO
M
ARKS.
CH
ILD
REN
WH
O A
RE
SU
FFIC
IEN
T H
EIG
HT
OR L
ENG
TH (
25 t
o 43
IN
s)
Is [
NAM
E]
curr
ently
bein
g br
east
fed?
Sin
ce y
este
rday
, di
d [N
AM
E] r
ecei
ve a
ny o
f th
e fo
llow
ing?
MEA
SU
RE
THE
CH
ILD
’S
MID
UPP
ER
ARM
CIR
CU
M-
FEREN
CE
ON
TH
E LE
FT A
RM
AN
D W
RIT
E D
OW
N T
HE
RAN
GE
IN
WH
ICH
TH
E M
EASU
REM
ENT
IS F
OU
ND
IS
BIL
ATER
AL
PITT
ING
O
EDEM
A
PRES
ENT?
Did
[N
AM
E]
exer
ienc
e di
arrh
oea
during
the
la
st 1
4 da
ys?
“How
did
you
tre
at [
NAM
E’S]
diar
rhoe
a?LI
ST
UP
TO T
HREE
MET
HO
DS”
Has
[N
AM
E]
had
a fe
ver
in t
he la
st
14 d
ays?
Incr
ease
d fo
od o
r dr
ink
give
n to
chi
ld1
(a)
(b)
Red
uced
foo
d or
liqu
id g
iven
to
child
2
Any
oth
er
liqui
dsSol
id o
r se
mi-
solid
(m
ushy
) fo
ods
Gav
e sp
ecia
l foo
ds t
o ch
ild3
Ora
l reh
ydra
tion
the
rapy
4
Oth
er (
spec
ify)
5
Red
uce
or s
top
brea
stfe
edin
g6
RED
1H
ome
rem
edy
7
YES 1
YES 1
YES
1YE
S
1YE
LLO
W
2YE
S
1
YES
1
No
trea
tmen
t8
YES
1
NO
2
NO
2
NO
2N
O>
>11
2
GREE
N
3
NO
2N
O
2>>
9N
O
2
NAM
E 1s
t2n
d3r
d
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 mO
Du
lE 2
: c
hil
D m
OD
ulE
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I78
I D C O D E
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
CH
ILD
REN
2 T
O 4
YEA
RS O
LDCH
ILD
REN
5 T
O 1
5 YE
ARS O
LD
Has
[N
AM
E] b
een
give
n an
inje
ctio
n ag
ains
t m
easl
es?
Doe
s [N
AM
E] g
o to
a p
lace
sp
ecia
lly for
chi
ldre
n to
lear
n,
to p
lay,
or
to b
e ta
ken
care
of?
Doe
s [N
AM
E]
atte
nd s
choo
l?
Wha
t is
the
mai
n re
ason
tha
t [N
AM
E] d
oes
not
atte
nd s
choo
l?W
hat
clas
s do
es [
NAM
E]
atte
nd?
Doe
s [N
AM
E’s]
sc
hool
hav
e a
Pare
nt T
each
er
Ass
ocia
tion
?
Has
[N
AM
E’s]
pa
rent
or
guar
dian
be
en in
volv
ed in
th
e Pa
rent
Tea
cher
Ass
ocia
tion
in t
he
last
6 m
onth
s?
Chi
ld n
ot in
tere
sted
1
Pare
nts
not
inte
rest
ed2
Educ
atio
n co
sts
3W
RIT
E D
OW
N T
HE
CLA
SS
Req
uire
d to
wor
k4
THE
ACCEP
TABLE
Chi
ld is
sic
k/di
sabl
ed5
AN
SW
ER W
ILL
BE
FRO
M
Chi
lds
look
s af
ter
61
TO 1
1
othe
rs in
hou
seho
ld
Sch
ool t
oo far
aw
ay7
No
scho
ol8
Oth
er (
spec
ify)
9
YES
1YE
S 1
YES >
>14
1
NEX
T CH
ILD
YES
1YE
S1
NO
2
NO
2
NO
2N
O >
> N
ext
2N
O >
> N
ext
2
child
child
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
mO
Du
lE 8
: A
gR
icu
ltu
RE/
liv
Es
tO
ck/
Fis
hER
iEs
(1)
Doe
s yo
ur h
ouse
hold
hav
e a
hom
e ga
rden
now
or
did
it h
ave
one
befo
re N
argi
s?
Yes
= 1
No
= 2
>>
3
(2)
Wha
t is
the
siz
e of
you
r cu
rren
t ho
me
gard
en?
(2a)
Wha
t w
as t
he s
ize
of y
our
hom
e ga
rden
bef
ore
Nar
gis?
feet
by
feet
feet
by
feet
(3)
Is a
nyon
e in
you
r ho
useh
old
able
to
cultiv
ate
crop
s no
w o
r
was
any
one
able
to
cultiv
ate
crop
s be
fore
Nar
gis?
Yes
= 1
No
= 2
>>
7
(4)
(5)
(6)
How
man
y ac
res
did
you
cultiv
ate
in
[CRO
P] t
his
seas
on
or d
o yo
u pl
an t
o cu
ltiv
ate?
How
man
y ac
res
did
you
cultiv
ate
in
[CRO
P] t
his
seas
on
or d
o yo
u pl
an t
o cu
ltiv
ate?
If t
here
was
a r
educ
tion
in a
cres
cul
tiva
ted,
w
hat
is t
he m
ain
reas
on f
or t
he r
educ
tion
?
Land
spo
iled
(sal
t)1
Dam
age
to d
rain
age
2
Not
eno
ugh
labo
r3
Lack
of
seed
s4
Lack
of
fert
ilize
r/pe
stic
ides
5
Lack
of
farm
too
ls6
Tree
s da
mag
ed/l
ost
7
ACRES
ACRES
Oth
er8
Mon
soon
pad
dy
Sum
mer
pad
dy
Pere
nnia
l cro
ps
(7)
Do
you
have
any
fi s
h or
cra
b po
nds
now
or
did
you
have
any
bef
ore
Nar
gis?
Yes
= 1
No
= 2
>>
11
(8)
(9)
(10)
How
man
y [I
TEM
] do
yo
u ha
ve n
ow?
How
man
y [I
TEM
] di
d yo
u ha
ve b
efor
e N
argi
s?
If t
here
is a
red
uction
in [
ITEM
], w
hat
is t
he
mai
n re
ason
for
the
red
uction
?
Pond
wat
er s
poile
d1
Sol
d2
Loan
ed t
o ot
her
3
Oth
er4
Fish
pon
ds
Cra
b po
nds
(11)
Do
you
have
any
live
stoc
k no
w o
r di
d yo
u ha
ve li
vest
ock
befo
re N
argi
s?Ye
s =
1N
o =
2 >
> 1
5
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I79
(1) PLEASE TELL ME HOW MANY DAYS IN THE PAST 7 DAYS YOU OR ANY MEMBER OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD ATE THE FOLLOWING FOODS
(EXCLUDE FOODS PURCHASED AND EATEN OUTSIDE OF THE HOME) Write the number of days from 0 to 7Food Group Examples
A. CEREALS bread, noodles, biscuits, cookies or any other foods made from millet, sorghum, maize, rice, wheat
B. VITAMIN A RICH VEGETABLES AND TUBERS
pumpkin, carrots, squash, sweet potato, broccoli
C. WHITE TUBERS AND ROOTS white potatoes, kohlrabi, arrowroot, casava (tapioca), yams, radishes
D. DARK GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES spinach, mustard greens, chinese kale, morning glory, pickle tea leaves
E. OTHER VEGETABLES tomoatoes, cucumber, lettuce, onion, cabbage, green herbs, red beet, and other vegetables including wild ones
F. VITAMIN A RICH FRUITS watermelon, peaches, apricots, oranges, papaya, mango
G. OTHER FRUITS AND DRIED FRUITS pomelo, mangosteen, apples, banana
H. FLESH MEATS beef, port, lamb, goat, rabbit, wild game, chicken, duck, or other birds
I. ORGAN MEAT (IRON RICH) liver, kidney, heart or other organ meats or blood-based foods
J. EGGS
K. FISH fresh or dried fish or shellfish, prawns, shrimp
L. LEGUMES, NUTS, SEEDS beans, peas, lentils, chickpeas, grams, cashew, groundnuts, nuts, seeds, or foods made from these
M. MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS butter, yogurt, ice cream and other products made with milk.
N. OILS AND FATS oils, fats, or butter added to food or used for cooking
O. SWEETS sugar, sugar cane, jaggery, honey, sweetened soda or sugary foods such as chocolates, sweets or candies
P. SPICES, CONDIMENTS, BEVERAGES spices (black pepper, salt), condiments (soy sauce, hot sauce), coffee, tea, soft drinks, alcoholic beverages
(2) DID ANYONE IN THE HOUSEHOLD EAT ANYTHING (MEAL OR SNACK) OUTSIDE OF THE HOUSEHOLD IN THE LAST 7 DAYS?
YES 1 No 2
(3) In the past 7 days, on average, how many meals and snacks did your household eat each day?
(4) In the past 7 days, did you have less than enough food for your household?
YES 1
NO >>7 2
(5) How often did this happen?
(1-3 TIMES) 1
(4-6 TIMES) 2
Every day 3
mODulE 3 :FOOD sEcuRity
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I80
(6) How often did you do the following when your household did not have enough food during the last 7 days?
Never 0
1-3 days a week 1
4-6 days a week 2
Every day 3
CHOSE LESS EXPENSIVE FOOD
CHOSE FOOD THAT YOU USUALLY DO NOT EAT
EAT LESS IN THE MAIN MEAL THAN NORMAL
EAT FEWER MEALS PER DAY
BORROWING FOOD OR BUYING FOOD ON CREDIT
GOT SUPPORT FROM FRIENDS AND RELATIVES
SOME MEMBERS OF HOUSEHOLD WENT WITHOUT MEALS
(7) What are the 3 most important sources of food for your household during the last 7 days?
WRITE “1” FOR THE MOST IMPORTANT, “2” FOR THE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT AND “3” FOR THE THIRD
MOST IMPORTANT
Own production
Gift from family
Purchases
Borrow/credit/advance (money)
Pre-harvest advance (food)
Exchange items for food
Exchange work for food (not food aid)
Food for work (food aid)
UN / INGO food aid
Government food aid
Local NGO / CBO (not faith based)
Faith based organization
Other
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I81
mODulE 4: WAtER AnD sAnitAtiOn
(1) What is the main source of drinking water for your dwelling?
PIPED WATER INTO DWELLING 1 >>4
PIPED WATER TO YARD/PLOT 2 >>4
PUBLIC TAP/STANDPIPE 3
TUBEWELL/BOREHOLE 4
PROTECTED DUG WELL 5
UNPROTECTED DUG WELL 6
PROTECTED SPRING 7
UNPROTECTED SPRING 8
RAINWATER COLLECTION 9
BOTTLED WATER 10 >>4
CART WITH SMALL TANK/DRUM 11 >>4
TANKER TRUCK 12 >>4
SURFACE WATER 13
OTHER (SPECIFY ______________________ ) 14
(2) Is the drinking water source within the compound?
YES 1
NO 2
(3) How long does it take to go there, get water and come back?
Number of minutes
If do not know, write “99”
(4) Do you treat your water in any way to make it safer to drink?
YES 1
NO 2 >>7
(5) Which of these methods do you use to make the water safe for drinking?
CHECK AL L THAT APPLY
YES 1 NO 2
BOIL
ADD BLEACH/CHLORINE
STRAIN IT THROUGH A CLOTH
USE WATER FILTER (CERAMIC, SAND, ETC)
SOLAR DISINFECTION
LET IT STAND AND SETTLE
OTHER (SPECIFY ________________ )
DON’T KNOW
(6) When was the last time you used one of these methods to make your water safer to drink?
TODAY 1
YESTERDAY 2
THIS WEEK 3
THIS MONTH 4
SEVERAL MONTHS AGO 5
OTHER (Specify ________________ ) 6
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I82
(7) What is the main source of water used by your household for other purposes, such as coooking and hand washing?
PIPED WATER INTO DWELLING 1
PIPED WATER TO YARD/PLOT 2
PUBLIC TAP/STANDPIPE 3
TUBEWELL/BOREHOLE 4
PROTECTED DUG WELL 5
UNPROTECTED DUG WELL 6
PROTECTED SPRING 7
UNPROTECTED SPRING 8
RAINWATER COLLECTION 9
CART WITH SMALL TANK/DRUM 10
TANKER TRUCK 11
SURFACE WATER 12
OTHER (SPECIFY _______________ ) 13
(8) Who in your household has the main responsibility for fetching the water used for your household?
Probe: Is this person under age 15 years? What sex? Circle the code that best describes this person
Adult woman 1
Adult man 2
Female child (under 15 years) 3
Male child (under 15 years) 4
Don’t know 5
(9) What kind, and how many, types of storage containers does your household have to store drinking water?
type How manydoes thehouseholdhave?
How manyhave a sealablelid?
How manyhave atap?
How manygallonsdoes eachone store?
Clay pots
Buckets
Jerry cans
Tin cans
Barrels (concrete)
Barrels (wood)
Barrels (others)
Other (specify)
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I83
(10) What kind of toilet facilities are in your dwelling?
Flush/pour flush to:
Piped sewer system 1
Septic tank 2
Pit latrine 3
Elsewhere 4
Unknown place/not sure/don't know 5
Ventilated improved pit latrine (VIP) 6
Pit latrine with slab 7
Pit latrine without slab/open pit 8
Composting toilet 9
Bucket 10
Hanging toilet/hanging latrine 11
No facilities or bush or field 12 >> 13
Other (specify) 13
(11) Do you share this facility with other households?
YES 1
NO 2 >>13
(12) How many other households share this toilet?
(13) The last time your youngest child passed stools, what was done to dispose of the stools?
CHILD USED TOILET/LATRINE 1
PUT/RINSED INTO TOILET OR LATRINE 2
PUT/RINSED INTO DRAIN OR DITCH 3
ASK ONLY IF THERE ARE CHILDRENLESS THAN 5 YEARS OLD IN THE
HOUSEHOLD
THROWN INTO GARBAGE 4
BURIED 5
LEFT IN OPEN 6
OTHER (Specify ________________ ) 7
DON'T KNOW 8
NO CHILDREN UNDER 5 IN HOUSEHOLD 9
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I84
(14) What methods do you use to dispose of solid waste in your household? MULTIPLE ANSWERS ALLOWED
BURN 1
BURY IN YARD 2
COMPOST 3
SCAVENGERS COLLECT 4
NEIGHBOURHOOD WASTE 5
COLLECTION & LOCAL DISPOSAL
THROW IN OWN YARD 6
THROW IN THE STREET 7
THROW IN RIVER/STREAM 8
OTHER (Specify ________________) 9
(15) Is there a bar of soap in the household?
YES 1
NO 2 >>NEXT MODULE
(16) Does the person who cooks the meals for the household wash his/her hands before preparing the food?
YES 1
NO 2
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I85
mODulE 5: hEAlth
1. How long does it take you to travel to the nearest health post/clinic?
Number of minutes
If don’t know, write “99”
2. Do you use the nearest health post/clinic?
Yes 1 >>4
No 2
3. What is the main reason you do not use the nearest
Wait time to see personnel too long 1
Usually no medicines available 2
Facility not open every day 3
Facility not clean 4
Facility has no equipment 5
Have to pay too much for the services 6
Prefer to use traditional healer 7
Use our own remedies for health problems 8
Other (specify) 9
4. On average, how long do you wait before being seen by medical personnel?
Number of minutes
If don’t know, write “99”
5. How often are medicines and drugs available at the health post/clinic?
All the time 1
Most of the time 2
Some of the time 3
Never 4
6. Is there a official village health worker in this village?
Yes 1
No 2
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I86
mODulE 6: hOusing
(1) What is the major construction material of the external walls?
Sticks & thatch/bamboo and palm leaves 1
Tarpaulin/polytarp 2
Mud/ wattle and daub 3
Wood 4
Bricks/blocks/concrete 5DIRECT OBSERVATION
Tin/Zinc 6
Mud 7
Banboo 8
Canvas, felt 9
Other (Specify) 10
(2) What is the major material of the roof?
Sticks & thatch/bamboo and palm leaves/Dhani 1
Tarpaulin/polytarp 2
Solid wood 3
Tiles 4
Shingles 5DIRECT OBSERVATION
Metal, tin or CGI 6
Asbestos 7
Plastic sheeting 8
Other (Specify) 9
(3) What is the primary material of the floor?
Parquet 1
Wood 2
Tile 3
Concrete 4DIRECT OBSERVATION
Clay/earthern floor 5
Other (Specify) 6
(4) Does the dwelling have any of the following features? OBSERVATION
MARK ALL THAT APPLY YES = 1 NO = 2
Dwelling built on raised ground
A wind break of trees or other plants
Shorter side of the dwelling faces windward direction
High gable roof or hip roof
Water tight roof able to harvest rainwater
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I87
(5) What type of dwelling is it?
Detached house 1
Multi-family house 2
Apartment 3
Several connected buildings 4
Several separate buildings 5
Other (Specify) 6
(6) Do you feel that is it safe to leave your belongings in your house when you leave?
YES 1
NO 2
(7) Is this dwelling owned by a member of your household
YES 1 >>9
NO 2
(8) Is the dwelling where this household lives:
Rented 1
Temporary shelter, paid or not paid 2
(9) Do you live in the same dwelling or compound that you lived in prior to Nargis?
YES 1
NO 2 >> 11
(10) Have you done major construction on your dwelling, or replaced the entire dwelling with a new building since Nargis?
YES 1
NO 2
(11) Do you want to return to where you lived before Nargis?
YES 1
NO 2
(12) Was the dwelling you lived in before Nargis owned by a member of your household?
YES 1 >>14
NO 2
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I88
(13) Was the dwelling you lived in before Nargis:
Rented 1
Temporary shelter, paid or not paid 2
(14) Do you think the dwelling is better, the same or worse than the dwelling you lived in before Nargis?
Better 1
The same 2
Worse 3
(15) Is your current house more crowded than before Nargis?
YES 1
NO 2
(16) Is your current house hotter than before Nargis?
YES 1
NO 2
(17) Does anyone in your household have another house?
YES 1
NO 2 >> 19
(18) Is this current house the strongest house of all the houses your household has?
YES 1
NO 2
(19) How many rooms is the sleeping area of the dwelling divided into?
(20) During the rainy season was this dwelling as dry as the dwelling you lived in before Nargis?
YES 1
NO 2
(21) Is this dwelling raised far enough above the ground to avoid flooding?
YES 1
NO 2
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I89
(22) Will this dwelling need improvements or maintenance during the next 18 months?
YES 1
NO 2
(23) Does anyone living in your dwelling have the skills to make needed repairs to the dwelling?
YES 1
NO 2
(24) Do any members of the community have the skills to make needed repairs to the dwelling?
YES 1
NO 2
(25) Is there a safe building within 1/2 mile from your dwelling where you can go in a big storm?
YES 1
NO 2
(26) What are the three main sources of income for the household at this time?
(Do not read the list)
Fishing 1
Agriculture (includes livestock/poultry/eggs) 2
Aquaculture (shrimp, prawn, crabs, etc) 3
Rent or lease of property 4
Salt production 5
Government employee 6
Private sector employee 7
Casual labour 8
Seasonal labour 9
Group labour (boss or member) 10
Treade/shopkeeper/village broker 11
Money sent by others 12
Self-employed/craftsman/artisan 13
Bar girl/massage/karaoke/entertainment 14
Savings 15
Borrowing (not microfinance) with collateral 16
Borrowing (not microfinance) without collateral 17
Microfinance initiative 18
Charcoal (manufacture & sale)/firewood 19
Forestry 20
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I90
Gifts/family 21
Pawning of assets 22
Sale of assets 23
Other (specify) 24
(27) What were the three main sources of income for the household before Cyclone Nargis?
(Do not read the list)
Fishing 1
Agriculture (includes livestock/poultry/eggs) 2
Aquaculture (shrimp, prawn, crabs, etc) 3
Rent or lease of property 4
Salt production 5
Government employee 6
Private sector employee 7
Casual labour 8
Seasonal labour 9
Group labour (boss or member) 10
Treade/shopkeeper/village broker 11
Money sent by others 12
Self-employed/craftsman/artisan 13
Bar girl/massage/karaoke/entertainment 14
Savings 15
Borrowing (not microfinance) with collateral 16
Borrowing (not microfinance) without collateral 17
Microfinance initiative 18
Charcoal (manufacture & sale)/firewood 19
Forestry 20
Gifts/family 21
Pawning of assets 22
Sale of assets 23
Other (specify) 24
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I91
mODulE 7: REliEF pROgRAms
1. Has anyone in this household received relief items since Nargis?
Yes 1
No 2 >> 3
2. What kinds of relief items has your household received?
More than one can be marked. If the household has received the item, write “1” in the box.
DO NOT READ THE LIST. LET THE RESPONDENT SAY WHAT HAS BEEN RECEIVED.
Seeds
Agricultural chemicals/fertililzer
Agricultural machinery
Agricultural equipment
Fishing equipment/boat with or without power
Livestock/poultry
Construction tools
Household items
Student kits/learning packs
Food
Water
Shelter/housing materials
Bednets
Soap/hygiene kit
Jerry can/bucket/water container of any type
Clothes
Personal items
Fuel
Medicine
Dignity Kits
Other
3. Are there any local organizations working in this community?
Yes 1
No 2
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I92
I D C O D E
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
CH
ILD
REN
2 T
O 4
YEARS O
LDCH
ILD
REN
5 T
O 1
5 Y
EARS O
LD
Has
[N
AM
E]
bee
n
giv
en a
n inje
ctio
n
agai
nst
mea
sles
?
Doe
s [N
AM
E]
go
to a
pla
ce
spec
ially
for
child
ren t
o le
arn,
to p
lay,
or
to b
e ta
ken c
are
of?
Doe
s [N
AM
E]
atte
nd s
choo
l?
What
is
the
mai
n r
easo
n t
hat
[N
AM
E]
doe
s not
att
end s
choo
l?W
hat
cla
ss d
oes
[NAM
E]
atte
nd?
Doe
s [N
AM
E’s
] sc
hoo
l hav
e a
Pare
nt
Teac
her
Ass
ocia
tion
?
Has
[N
AM
E’s
] par
ent
or g
uar
dia
n
bee
n invo
lved
in
the
Pare
nt
Teac
her
Ass
ocia
tion
in t
he
last
6 m
onth
s?
Child
not
inte
rest
ed1
Pare
nts
not
inte
rest
ed2
Educa
tion
cos
ts3
WRIT
E D
OW
N T
HE C
LASS
Req
uired
to
wor
k4
THE A
CCEPT
ABLE
Child
is
sick
/dis
able
d5
AN
SW
ER W
ILL
BE F
RO
M
Child
s lo
oks
afte
r6
1 T
O 1
1
other
s in
hou
sehol
d
Sch
ool to
o fa
r aw
ay7
No
schoo
l8
Oth
er (
spec
ify)
9
YES
1YE
S
1YE
S
>>
14
1
NEXT
CH
ILD
YES
1YE
S1
NO
2
NO
2
NO
2N
O >
> N
ext
2N
O >
> N
ext
2
child
child
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
mO
Du
lE 8
: A
gR
icu
ltu
RE/
liv
Es
tO
ck/
Fis
hER
iEs
(1)
Doe
s yo
ur
hou
sehol
d h
ave
a hom
e gar
den
now
or
did
it
hav
e on
e bef
ore
Nar
gis
?
Yes
= 1
No
= 2
>>
3
(2)
What
is
the
size
of yo
ur
curr
ent
hom
e gar
den
?
(2a)
What
was
the
size
of yo
ur
hom
e gar
den
bef
ore
Nar
gis
?fe
et b
y fe
et
feet
by
feet
(3)
Is a
nyo
ne
in y
our
hou
sehol
d a
ble
to
cultiv
ate
crop
s now
or
was
anyo
ne
able
to
cultiv
ate
crop
s bef
ore
Nar
gis
?Ye
s =
1N
o =
2 >
> 7
(4)
(5)
(6)
How
man
y ac
res
did
you
cultiv
ate
in
[CRO
P] t
his
sea
son
or d
o yo
u p
lan t
o cu
ltiv
ate?
How
man
y ac
res
did
you
cultiv
ate
in
[CRO
P] t
his
sea
son
or d
o yo
u p
lan t
o cu
ltiv
ate?
If t
her
e w
as a
red
uct
ion in a
cres
cultiv
ated
, w
hat
is
the
mai
n r
easo
n f
or t
he
reduct
ion?
Land s
poi
led (
salt)
1
Dam
age
to d
rain
age
2
Not
enou
gh lab
or3
Lack
of
seed
s4
Lack
of
fert
ilize
r/pes
tici
des
5
Lack
of
farm
too
ls6
Tree
s dam
aged
/los
t7
ACRES
ACRES
Oth
er8
Mon
soon
pad
dy
Sum
mer
pad
dy
Pere
nnia
l cr
ops
(7)
Do
you h
ave
any
fi sh
or
crab
pon
ds
now
or
did
you
hav
e an
y bef
ore
Nar
gis
?Ye
s =
1N
o =
2 >
> 1
1
(8)
(9)
(10)
How
man
y [I
TEM
] do
you h
ave
now
?
How
man
y [I
TEM
] did
you
hav
e bef
ore
Nar
gis
?
If t
her
e is
a r
educt
ion in [
ITEM
], w
hat
is
the
mai
n r
easo
n f
or t
he
reduct
ion?
Pond w
ater
spoi
led
1
Sol
d2
Loan
ed t
o ot
her
3
Oth
er4
Fish
pon
ds
Cra
b p
onds
(11)
Do
you h
ave
any
lives
tock
now
or
did
you
hav
e liv
esto
ck b
efor
e N
argis
?Ye
s =
1N
o =
2 >
> 1
5
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I93
(12)
(13)
(14)
How
man
y [A
NIM
AL]
do
you
hav
e now
?
How
man
y [A
NIM
AL]
di
d yo
u h
ave
befo
re
Nar
gis?
If t
her
e is
a r
educt
ion in
the
num
ber
of
[AN
IMAL]
, w
hat
is t
he
mai
n r
easo
n f
or t
he
redu
ctio
n?
Anim
als
died
1
Anim
als
sold
2
Anim
als
eate
n3
Lost
4
Don
't k
now
5
Oth
er6
Chic
kens
Duck
s, g
eese
, m
un-d
ar-l
ee
Milk
cow
s
Cat
tle
Buffal
o
Don
keys
/hor
ses
Goa
ts
Pigs
(15)
Do
you h
ave
any
fi shin
g eq
uip
men
t now
or
did
you h
ave
any
fi shin
g eq
uip
men
t be
fore
N
argi
s?Ye
s =
1N
o =
2 >
> n
ext
sect
ion
(16)
(17)
(18)
How
man
y [I
TEM
] do
you
hav
e now
?
How
man
y [I
TEM
] di
d yo
u h
ave
befo
re
Nar
gis?
If t
her
e is
a r
educt
ion in
[IT
EM
], w
hat
is
the
mai
n r
easo
n f
or t
he
redu
ctio
n?
Des
troy
ed1
Sol
d2
Loan
ed t
o so
meo
ne
3
Dam
aged
/nee
ds r
epai
r4
Oth
er5
Offsh
ore/
deep
wat
er b
oats
Insh
ore
boat
s
Riv
er b
oats
(w
ith o
r w
ithou
t po
wer
)
Oth
er b
oats
Fish
ing
net
s
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I94
mODulE 9: DuRAblE gOODs
Does anyone in your household own the following goods?
“Yes = 1 No = 2”
“Did anyone in your household own the good prior to Nargis? Yes = 1 No = 2 >> next item”
“Do you consider it necesary to obtain this item as soon as possible? Yes = 1 No = 2”
1 Bed
2 Blankets, bedding
3 Table
4 Chair
5 Fan
6 Radio
7 Television
8 Sewing machine
9 Stove
10 Refrigerator
11 Bicycle
12 Motorcycle
13 Car
14 Boat/canoe
15 Fishing net
16 Clock
17 Wheelbarrow
18 Hoe
19 Ax
20 Dishes/eating utensils
21 Cooking utensils
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I95
mODulE 10: nEEDs
What are the three most important needs that your household has today?
(Do not read out the list.)
Agricultural inputs Rank
Animal feed / fodder
Clothing
Cooking utensils
Credit / microfinance / credit unions
Dishes/eating utensils
Education
Employment
Fishery inputs
Food
Healthcare / drugs / medicine
Household items
Livestock (including fowl)
Salt industry inputs
Shelter (including materials and labour)
Sleeping mats/bednets/blankets
Veterinary inputs
Water
Other (specify)
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I96
3.1.3 QuAlitAtivE mEthODOlOgy
In-depth qualitative data was collected in a directed manner using a 'plug-in' approach. This data relates to the protection of women and children using a series of closed and open questions. The working assumption of the vulnerability assessment instrument is that, if people are unable to benefit from outside assistance after Cyclone Nargis, and if customary rules of cooperation are not working, then levels of vulnerability increase. A total of 349 households were interviewed as part of the qualitative plug-in.
The inclusion of the plug-in assessment with a quantitative household survey was a mixed-methods approach. Although such approaches are widely used in social science research, they have not previously been used in disaster and post-disaster relief contexts due to the significant logistical and organisational requirements.
The purpose of the qualitative investigation was to use household survey data to understand how internationally recognised indicators of potential vulnerability are expressed at the level of lived experience. It also provides concrete examples or 'stories' of risk categories that were quantified in filter sets that were measured by the day-filter and to function as a verification instrument for day-filter sets.
A day-filter of queries was applied to the quantitative survey data at the end of each day during the quantitative data-entry period. The queries defined the criteria for revisiting households for further investigation. The set of case-definitions used are related to the protection of women and children.
In addition, adaptive sampling techniques were used to identify households that were not included in the quantitative survey. There was also some variation in the criteria for selecting communities from the quantitative survey as some communities were selected for their remoteness.
The filter set contained standardised indicators for domains of risk, but they did not in themselves constitute all potential, culture-specific risk categories. The filter set used is set out below.
1. Household with malnourished child.
2. Household with school-age child not attending school.
3. Household with reduced (i.e., compared to before Nargis) utilisation of land.
4. Household with children living in sub-standard accommodation.
5. Female-headed household with young children.
6. Household in which main (domestic) carer is male.
7. Household in which the main carer is less than 18 years old.
8. Household in which the main carer is a grandparent.
9. Household that consists of members of different pre-Nargis households.
10. Household with an adolescent girl who is unrelated to the head of household.
The qualitative instrument builds upon data that is both technical (e.g. definitions of malnutrition, reduced utilisation of land, and sub-standard accommodation) and empirical (e.g. female-headed households with young children and households in which the main carer is a grandparent). It was therefore necessary to identify households through cooperation between the quantitative enumerators and qualitative fieldworkers.
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I97
summARy OF QuAlitAtivE invEstigAtiOn
The qualitative investigation for the TCG Periodic Review uses information from the large-scale household survey for the Periodic Review to identify categories of vulnerability to which closed and open-ended interview protocols for assessing vulnerability are applied.
The focus of the intervention is primarily the protection of women and children. However, in that women and children are made vulnerable in natural disasters by circumstances often unrelated to age or gender, the qualitative survey focuses on the functioning of the formal aid institutions and indigenous social networks before, during, and after Cyclone Nargis.
Information about the functioning of these aid institutions and social networks is then gathered by employing recognised categories of vulnerability for women and children to identify informants from the household survey. Information on vulnerable populations is also gathered by employing new categories of vulnerability identified through additional case histories documented during the qualitative research process.
QuAlitAtivE instRumEnt (vulnERAbility suRvEy)
The qualitative investigation for this project was carried out over approximately a two-week period in November 2008. Insofar as possible, this qualitative investigation followed the pattern of sites selected for the quantitative household survey, which mapped the cyclone-affected region into 113 contiguous hexagons. Household survey enumerators worked out of four 'hubs'. Each hub was assigned a qualitative hub leader, an English-speaking translator (sometimes the same as the hub leader), and two or three additional fieldworkers.
Prior to departure from the capital, Yangon, all fieldworkers received basic training in the use of the questionnaire, including an extended session in which filter categories were discussed in detail, with examples provided of each. Eighteen part-time and full-time fieldworkers were trained over a two-day period. Emphasis was placed on recording detailed narratives, not on the quantity of interviews completed.
stRuctuRE OF inQuiRy
Use of the day-filter system developed specifically for the rapid identification of vulnerable households, allowed for a speedy qualitative response to the entry of quantitative information from the household survey. Because the day-filter allows for case-definitions of vulnerability to be run on data as it is entered, workers in the future can employ this system to begin informed and directed qualitative fieldwork almost immediately.
Even though the relative importance of particular case definitions cannot be quantified accurately until all household survey data has been entered, a case definition that is strongly represented (for post-Nargis efforts, for instance, a ‘household with reduced utilisation of land’, or a ‘household with children living in sub-standard accommodation’) emerged within the first day or two of data entry. This system allows for far better focused disaster response than relief efforts managed autonomously by governmental, non-governmental, or UN organisations.
The system also allows for more efficient identification of households earmarked for revisiting, and for the development of an integrated tactical use of human resources in the field for identifying and responding to the needs of vulnerable populations following a natural disaster.
The approach employed in the utilisation of fieldworkers and other related post-disaster human resources involved two primary stages of response. In Stage I—that is, the period of a few days immediately following the initial of entry of household survey data—the field teams focused on gathering sample qualitative surveys for each of the 10 case filters. Focusing immediately on the examinations of case filters serves the urgent purpose in disaster and post-disaster assessments of understanding how general categories of vulnerability are locally expressed. Doing so also allows for some judgement to be made regarding the nature and prevalence of diverse human needs. In one village, for instance, where the household survey identified a dominant problem with school-age children not attending school, the qualitative research team quickly identified households expressing 7 of the 10 risk categories used in the household survey as filter sets. Stage I, in other
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I98
words, functions both as a means of addressing local, cultural expressions of need, but also as a reconnaissance tool for gathering information about the strength of case filters and the extent of human need in disaster and post-disaster relief efforts.
At the conclusion of Stage I — as soon as all categories were sampled in the four hub locations and their surveys were submitted for translation—qualitative fieldworkers immediately shifted their attention to Stage II. In this stage the focus of the qualitative survey turned towards identifying and recording case histories based on the demographic distribution of human need in disaster-affected areas. In Stage II of the qualitative vulnerability survey project, fieldworkers divided into smaller groups of two, or worked individually. This change in research strategy allowed for fieldworkers to visit remote villages. The focus of Stage II of the qualitative intervention was to gather detailed case histories across the entire demographic range of cyclone-affected regions. As the severity of natural disasters are always variably experienced, these researchers, now sensitised to the exigencies of life in disaster-affected areas, were able to gather information from both isolated and so-called ‘new’ villages composed of resettled, post-disaster inhabitants. The combination of this two-stage research technique allowed both for a rapid assessment of need and enough detailed accounts to venture an educated assessment of how relief and post-disaster resources might best be utilised in the context of the Cyclone-affected area of Myanmar.
3.1.4 QuAlitAtivE AssEssmEnt tOOls
The qualitative vulnerability assessment instrument was composed of a series of closed and open questions in three general domains.
The first domain of inquiry within the qualitative vulnerability assessment instrument examined formal kinds of post-disaster assistance. Formal [F] domains of inquiry included:
[F1] Nature of assistance received (which Government agencies, UN agengies, international NGOs, or local NGOs?)
[F2] Period (when?)
[F3] Duration of effect (temporary or long-term?)
[F4] Type (kind of assistance provided?)
[F5] Needs met?
[F5] Needs not met?
[F6] Equality of access?
Levels of vulnerability are identified by the presence or absence of formal assistance, and, where present [F1], the details of its implementation and effects [F2-F6].
Community domains examine indigenous community structures, modes of cooperation, resilience, and mutability. Community [C] domains of inquiry included:
[C1] Nature of community cooperation (presence or absence?)
[C2] Customary rules (Do they exist? What are they? Compliance?)
[C3] Duration of effect (Temporary or long-term?)
[C4] New forms?
[C5] Equality of access?
[C6] Sustainability (Will they grow or continue? How can we promote sustainability?)
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I99
Vulnerability domains examine of perceptions of vulnerability. Vulnerability [V] domains of inquiry included:
[V1] Identifying the vulnerable (who suffered most?)
[V2] Nature of vulnerability (kind of vulnerability?)
[V3] Coping (patterns altered?)
[V4] Normal or calamity (kind of coping?)
3.1.5 QuAlitAtivE REsults
The results presented here are a preliminary report that, at the time of writing, is based upon incomplete data analysis, therefore not wholly representative of its long-term findings. It attempts to identify general domains of vulnerability that are prevalent in the evidence examined to date. In disaster settings the presentation of such qualified evidence becomes necessary in order to make better judgements at the level of relief aid and policy.
It is certainly the case that natural disasters by definition create circumstances where already disadvantaged individuals or social groups suffer disproportionately more than those whose lives are more secure. The purpose of this study is, therefore, less one of describing the worst scenarios or cases of unimaginable individual suffering, than of enhancing our understanding of how formal institutions and social networks respond to an unanticipated natural calamity that strains them to their limits—often breaking them completely, but sometimes also necessitating their reformulation in new and unexpected ways.
The names of people and villages used in this document are fictitious. They were changed to protect the identities of the people interviewed. Interviews were conducted in the Myanmar language and then translated into English.
cAsE 1) thAWtAR khin
Risk Category: 2 – Household with school-age child not attending school
Risk Category: 4 – Household with children living in sub-standard accommodation
Thawtar Khin, a 22 year-old woman, and her two children moved to her parents’ house after she separated from her husband just before the Cyclone. Her father is U Ko Gyi, a 55 year-old day worker who has to work every day in order to maintain the family’s income while her mother is sick and bed-ridden. Before the Cyclone, the family got water and sold it to other people. Sometimes they made money by doing odd jobs. After the Cyclone, no one bought their water anymore and there were no offers for any odd jobs. Their lives have become very challenging.
Before the Cyclone, the family’s house was enough for the whole family to live in. But after the wind blew down the house, they did not have enough money to rebuild it. So instead they built a small tent in which all the members live. Since the tent is small it is quite crowded. Currently, Thawtar Khin’s mother is sick and the family does not have enough money to send her to a clinic. There is no doctor in the village and the nearest one is very far away, so they cannot send her. They could not afford to buy more food after the Cyclone destroyed their food stock in their house. Thawtar Khin has lost a lot of weight since she is also breast-feeding her two year old daughter.
Thawtar Khin’s 16 year-old brother helps the family by selling water around their community. Her 11 year-old sister just stays at home and helps her with the housework since they do not have money to send her to school. She said that when her sister grows up, she will ask her to get a job to support the family.
After waiting three months, the family got some assistance from an INGO. They received a bag of rice, a water tank, some mats, mosquito nets and some kitchenware. Thawtar Khin was very happy that these items helped her with her family’s needs. They lost their mosquito nets in the Cyclone and so were quite happy to get new ones. Although this help did not cover all their needs, the family was still happy to get it just when they needed it the most.
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I100
Thawtar Khin also said, “We want to rebuild our home. The tent we built is not in good shape. The whole family is living in it and it may collapse. There’s a very big puddle with a bad smell nearby that makes the tent unliveable. I’m looking forward to the day when my children can attend a school. Right now food is our greatest need.”
cAsE 2) DAW myA sEin
Risk Category: 3 – Household with reduced utilisation of land
When the Cyclone struck, most of the rice fields were ripe and about to be harvested. The fields were destroyed and people who owned many acres suffered a great loss. After the Cyclone, people who owned rice fields were left with no money to invest and no seeds to plant. Since landowners do not have money to start planting, casual workers also became jobless. They do not have any money to start other kinds of work. A lot of boats were also destroyed. Homes that were destroyed were only rebuilt for temporary use. Since agricultural workers cannot get back on their feet, they cannot rebuild their homes.
Daw Mya Sein lives in a village with her family of six, who work on a farm. She is 55 years old. All of her children have only primary-school education, though one of her grandsons is attending middle school. The family can only send one child to school. All the other family members work on the farm.
They planted 20 acres of paddy before the Cyclone. They were not in debt because their income matched their expenses, but now they can no longer plant or work on their farm after the Cyclone. In Daw Mya Sein’s village, the Cyclone destroyed most of the houses including hers. The crops were also ruined because they had not been harvested. The family cannot afford to plant paddy for the rainy-season crop. All the households in the village are in trouble now.
Daw Mya Sein’s family have received seeds and other assistance from an INGO to plant for the rainy-season crop, but it is not enough to cover all of the farm. They have had to borrow money from other people and pay the interest from their profit, meaning that they will not be able to get out of this debt easily. It will not be easy for them to go back to the way things were before the Cyclone. The family is always worried that things will never be as good as they were before the Cyclone.
One of Daw Mya Sein’s sisters has lent her money and the family has used the loan to plant betel. They will have to give half of their profits to the sister, meaning that the family business has become less profitable. They have not been able to repair their home yet, but only make some temporary repairs.
The family received farm assistance because they owned their own farm, though they were not eligible to receive food aid. They rely on other people to share their food with them. Their loss is substantial because of the size of the farm land they own. All the farming families have troubles. Day labourers are in trouble because farm owners have no work to give them.
The betel plants are now being attacked by insects. The family planted 1,500 plants a month ago and are worried everyday about them being infested. They used to be a happy family free of debt and worry. Even though Daw Mya Sein’s grandson is attending school, it is very difficult to support him. The family needs more help to stabilise their livelihood and return their lives to normal, as it was before the Cyclone.
cAsE 3) DAW thEt thEt sWE
Risk Category: 2 - Household with school-aged child not attending school
Daw Thet Thet Swe, a 41 year old woman has five children with a husband, who is a farm labourer. Her husband lives in a hut on the farm where he works and so was not available at the time of survey. He lives quite far away from the family home.
In front of the house is a big field where seedless and failed riceplants look like they are trying to survive under a very hot sun. Daw Thet Thet Swe said, “We do not know why the riceplants are like that, this is the first time we’ve seen that. We think it is from the Cyclone”
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I101
Her husband, who works the farm, has four main tasks that follow the four seasons. From April to July, he ploughs the fields and grows the rice. From July to November, he plants rice for the rainy season. From November to January, he harvests the riceplants, winnows it, and stores it in the barn. After that, he ploughs the field again for summer paddy during January to April. He can come back home only for a short while during these four periods. “He’s living there, working for them, and cannot come back here. We do not get to go to him either - we have not seen each other for quite a long time. Only when the Cyclone hit could he come back,” Daw Thet Thet Swe said with a faint smile.
When she was asked why the family did not join him in the field, she said, “Who will feed us? They feed only my husband, so I have to stay here with my five children,” pointing to her eldest son of 18, another of 15, two daughters of 13 and 8, and the youngest son of 4. She also added, “Just to feed them every day is so difficult, how can we send them to school? Before the Cyclone, we could still send two of them to school. After the Cyclone, we had to drop the middle daughter out of the school and made her help me make and sell food. Now we only have one child attending school.’’
Daw Thet Thet Swe meets the family’s needs by selling traditional and seasonal foods. Her eldest son used to work in a rice mill in the village as a day labourer. He lost his job for three months after the Cyclone knocked out the mill. Being a labourer, he has to carry rice from the field to the mill, winnow it, and clean it.
In order to plan their lives after the Cyclone, the family has borrowed money from a farm owner at high interest, about 60 per cent. They have to pay 60,000 kyat in interest when they borrow 100, 000. Her husband’s yearly wage is 50 baskets of paddy, which is equivalent to 200,000 kyat. Now they have to spend the high-interest loan and they will never be able to get out of the circle of debt – they are always in heavy debt. At the same time, her husband cannot give up being a day-labourer since he has better job security as a farm worker, and it is easier to borrow money or get wages in advance. Thus people in villages prefer to be farm labourers rather than casual labourers. Job scarcity for casual labourers has caused a lot of stress.
The family has received aid from two INGOs and two local NGOs, who provided some support to the family. They received tarpaulins from a local NGO, a kit of items for everyday use such as soap, tooth paste, kitchen utensils from one INGO, and a sack of rice from another INGO. This assistance was adequate, and they did not need to worry about their basic survival. Some of the aid was in the form of durable goods for use over the long-term, while others, like food and rice, covered only a certain period of time.
In Daw Thet Thet Swe’s opinion, the most vulnerable groups who suffered the most after the Cyclone, are the poorest in the village. Even though they have received support with materials to rebuild their homes, these people cannot finish because they cannot afford it. Since her husband is a farm labourer, Daw Thet Thet Swe’s family was able to borrow money from a land owner at high interest, but the family still cannot afford the cost of rebuilding the house. Without her husband, she is trying to solve her family’s everyday problems and trying to relieve their suffering while her husband is working away from home.
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I102
cAsE 4) DAW myint thEin
Risk Category: 5 – Female-headed household with young children
A widow named Daw Myint Thein and her two sons of 24 and 17 live at the centre of a village near the bank of a canal. Their hut is built of bamboo and they use palm leaves for the roof. The height is too low for a grown person to stand up in and the hut is near foul-smelling mud and polluted water. The family stated that the house they are living in was built with the generous help of their village.
Daw Myint Thein’s husband died two years before the Cyclone, when her family lived in a house her husband had built made of wood and bamboo. During the Cyclone, the whole house was washed away and they had to run for their lives and take shelter at a monastery. The place where they had lived their lives full of pride and joy had turned into a devastated hovel overnight.
From the Cyclone, the family’s living conditions is not the only thing that has changed - their health and income was affected as well. When the Cyclone washed their home away, it also carried away everything they ever owned, including the money which Daw Myint Thein invested to sell vegetables. Once a very proud widow, now she has nothing left to invest and therefore her eldest son has to do heavy work at the ricemill carrying ricebags and other heavy items. He got injured, with his spinal column getting compressed from this hard work. Her younger son, who is just 17, therefore had to quit school and do the same kind of work as his brother for the family to survive.
The family got support from the Government and from INGOs. Two months after the Cyclone they received some donations, but these were not enough for the long run. Nevertheless, the family is very grateful for these items, such as tarpaulin sheets to cover the roof, pots, longyis (a woman’s garment) and mats from an INGO, as well as rice and cooking oil from the Government. They hope they can get more of these items so they can get back on their feet again soon.
Daw Myint Thein stated that while the Cyclone may have destroyed their home and changed her family’s conditions, it cannot destroy their spirits. She hopes she gets a chance to get back to the way things were before the Cyclone, when she was selling things. To do that she hopes for the day when she can get a small amount of money to reinvest to get back on her feet.
cAsE 5) u khin mOE
Risk Category: 3 – Household with reduced utilisation of land
U Khin Moe is a community leader who lives in the eastern part of Kun Chan Village. He has a big wooden house with a galvanised-iron roof. He and his wife have 7 sons, though 4 of the elder sons are married and live separately.
Ten years ago, U Khin Moe was only a daily-wage worker and did not own any land. Through hard work and good management, he bought one paddy field after another. He now owns 40 acres of paddy fields. His sons show their father respect since he has raised them very well. Before the Cyclone, U Khin Moe’s business was going well and everyone in the village respected him.
The villagers therefore asked him to be the Chairman of the Committee for Providing Electricity to the Village. Through his efforts, the village was able to set up electric poles for electricity to be brought to their village. People who owned farm land donated 300,000 - 500,000 kyats. Some even borrowed money at interest in order to pay their share. It was only a matter of days - 10 to be precise - until the village would get electricity when the Cyclone struck and destroyed everything in its path, including the electric poles and cables. It also destroyed U Khin Moe’s farm lands. Now he can only manage to cultivate 28 of his 40 acres. The remaining 12 acres are infertile.
U Khin Moe shared his experiences about the night when the Cyclone struck his village. He was not worried since his house was big and strong. As the night grew darker, the water level reached 3 feet. Right then a house nearby was about to collapse and so the family of 5 living there came rushing into his home seeking shelter. Waiting for the wind to calm down and the water to subside, the whole family and the neighbours taking refuge with them stayed up the whole night. The next day, they all found many huts that had collapsed. U Khin Moe’s house only suffered damage to a small part of the roof, where some of the galvanised iron sheets were torn.
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I103
He was heartbroken when he saw that the electric poles had fallen down. He got really worried about what the community would think of him, and what people who had borrowed money to contribute to the project would say. It was too much for him when he saw that his paddy fields were destroyed. He could not sleep or eat. He was found walking in the village at night talking gibberish to himself. When the village became aware of his situation, they were really worried and arranged medical treatment for him. They took him to see psychiatric specialists in Yangon 3 months ago. Through the support the community gave him and the treatment he has received for the last 3 months, he was able to recover. He is now recovered and slowly talked about his experiences during the Cyclone.
The Cyclone caused 43 causalities in this village. Relief assistance such as paddy seeds, fertilizers, machines, and household goods provided by the Government and INGOs, were helpful to the villagers.
cAsE 6) u hlA sOE
Risk Category: 4 – Household with children living in sub-standard accommodation
U Hla Soe and his family lost their home in a Township in Yangon Division during the Cyclone. They could not afford to rebuild in the same place and so moved in to share with relatives in his grandmother’s house in the same Township. Now nine family members have to survive together in this tiny hut.
The main income-earner of this household is his daughter, Daw Chit, who works as a cook for a soccer team near their house. She earns 500 kyats per day and gets extra rice and food items, which she usually brings home to share with other members of the family. U Hla Soe and his wife sometimes provide money for the family if they have any. They also ask for money from U Hla Soe when they need it.
U Hla Soe said, “Water leaks terribly when it rains and there is nowhere to hide in the house. Nobody came and helped us after the storm. We only got a bag of rice from an INGO and another from a ward [government] authority, but we received no money to repair the house or buy new thatch for the roof. We find it difficult just to find food every day, how can we repair our house or support our children?”
He also added, “Everyone is gone, everything we have, the roof, walls, clothes, everything. We went two days without eating and we had nowhere to live. We just had to live in the railway station. I cannot describe the trouble we had. People in the same ward were not able to come and help us, they were even worse off than us. My daughter’s husband is a carpenter and if there is any work, he’ll go to work for several days. When he comes back we get a little money for the things we need.”
cAsE 7) u tOE kyi
Risk Category: 8 – Household in which the main carer is a grandparent
A six year-old boy named Maung Nay Lwin was visiting his grandparents, who lived in the middle of Kun Chan Village, when the Cyclone struck. He lost both of his parents as well as a sister, who were living on the bank of a stream where his father earned a living as a fisherman. His whole family drowned, but he was spared because he was at his grandparents’ house.
The boy’s grandfather, U Toe Kyi, lives in the centre of the village. He owns a one-acre fruit garden where he used to grew betel and fruit. His garden was destroyed by the Cyclone and he needs money to replant. He is now having a hard time helping his family survive.
Although the grandparents are in a very difficult position, they are trying their best to meet their grandson’s needs as much as they can. U Toe Kyi and his wife were saddened by the loss of their son and his family, and they give everything they can to support their grandson. They have even sent him to school to receive a proper education. They try everything to make him happy - they buy him
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I104
toys and take him to festivals. But sometimes they can see him sitting quietly lost in his thoughts, thinking about his family. They are very worried and concerned for his future as well as his mental health. They hope there will be a day when they can get help to replant their garden.
U Toe Kyi told us that their house collapsed and all the fruits and vegetables which they were growing for their income were destroyed. The Albizzia lebbek tree in front of their house has fallen and blocked the path to his house. Their income has been devastated ever since the Cyclone destroyed their garden. Hence he had to seek help from his daughter, who is married and living separately.
U Toe Kyi wants to grow his garden back to the same way it was prior to the Cyclone and so would like to have money to invest. If he can get back to the way things were before, he could help send his grandson to school. He would also like to get help from the Government for his grandson, such as for school fees, meals and the overall costs of sending him to school to get a university degree.
cAsE 8) u mAW thAnE
Risk Category: 8 – Household in which the main carer is a grandparent
U Maw Thane, the 60 year-old head of a household, has a wife and a granddaughter. He and his wife are farmers. Their family is poor. Six months before Cyclone Nargis, a tornado hit their village. During the tornado, his house and two neighbouring houses were destroyed. The tornado was so strong that his bullock cart and other agricultural equipment went up in the air. His granddaughter who was playing around his neighbour’s house was sucked up into the air and then fell onto the bank of a canal in the field. She was hurt but luckily survived, though she was left with a scar.
The granddaughter’s parents were day workers. Just before the Cyclone, they took her and her three brothers and sisters to a place near the sea to find firewood. When the Cyclone occurred, the parents put all the children into a container and pushed them into the sea to escape the tidal waves. Her brother and sisters died in the sea. She survived with the help of a rescue group, but received a severe head injury. She came back to the village and is now being looked after by her grandparents.
Despite their financial difficulties, her grandparents have sent her to school. But because of her head injury, she has not been able to learn like other children and her memory is bad. She has been downgraded from Grade I to Kindergarten. Sometimes the doctors come to the village and treat her. Whenever the sky gets dark with heavy rainclouds, she stares vacantly in dejection. Sometimes she asks for her parents to come back to live with her. Her mental suffering continues.
cAsE 9) DAW kyi Ohn
Risk Category: 1 – Household with malnourished child
Risk Category: 2 – Household with school-age child not attending school
Risk Category: 4 – Household with children living in sub-standard accommodation
Risk Category: 5 – Female-headed household with young children
Daw Kyi Ohn, a widow as well as head of the household, has a family of four including two sons and one daughter. During the night when the Cyclone came, a strong gust of wind nearly knocked over their house. She and her children were sitting on a mat inside the hut and they quickly ran out and away. Her eldest son was in front running, and she saw an electric pole fall on him. He died instantly.
When she saw her son lying on the road under the electric pole, Daw Kyi Ohn shouted and asked for help. No one could hear her over the wind and she felt helpless. She tried to lift up the electric pole on her own but could not because of the weight. Touching her son’s body, she found that he was already dead. While she was crying with her two children, the water quickly rushed onto the road and she had to run to a big house on the other side of the road, where she took shelter. The water reached 3 feet and flooded the whole village. The next day when the winds calmed down, she asked for help from her community to bury her dead son’s body.
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I105
In addition to the loss of her son, her hut was almost destroyed from the strong wind and water. After the Cyclone, she only lives in a small hut. In the disaster, she also lost her savings and belongings. Accordingly, she cannot sell vegetables like before. For the family to survive, her son had to drop out of the 6th grade and work on a duck farm, where he gets 700 kyat per day. Since she does not have any money to buy vegetables to sell, she has to find odd jobs or daily work. She told us that finding this type of work is difficult and so she has to rely on her son’s salary to survive. She cannot continue sending her daughter to school, who was attending the 5th grade.
The family received rice, cooking oil, clothing and other things they needed from the Government, INGOs and local NGOs. They were were so happy to receive them because they met the needs of their family. Daw Kyi Ohn told us that before the Cyclone, the money she got from selling vegetables in the village could send all of her children to school. Now she has to rely on her son’s salary and both of her children have had to drop out of school. She felt she would go mad when the Cyclone took her eldest son, their hut, their belongings and all the money she could have used to invest. She told us the children face malnutrition problems. She also said that she really wants to send them back to school and for that she is going to be strong and will never give up. She just needs some investment money to restart her life.
Post-Nargis Periodic Review I106
3.2 list OF tOWnships in AssEssmEnt AREA
Ayeyarwady Division
Bogale
Dedaye
Kyaiklat
Labutta
Maubin
Mawlamyinegyun
Myaungmya
Ngapudaw
Pathein
Pyapon
Wakema
Yangon Division
Dagon Myothit (North)
Dagon Myothit (Seikkan)
Dagon Myothit (South)
Dala
Hlaingtharya
Htantabin
Insein
Kawhmu
Kayan
Kungyangon
Kyauktan
North Okkalapa
Seikgyikanaungto
Shwepyithar
Thaketa
Thanlyin
Thingangkuun
Thongwa
Twantay