29
Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Nantucket Planning Office2010 ATM Warrant Article Review

January 21, 2010

Page 2: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations

Page 3: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations

Page 4: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations

Page 5: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations

Page 6: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 38: Eel Point RoadLUG-2 to LUG-3

Page 7: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 39: Appleton RoadRC-2 to LUG-3 or VTEC

Page 8: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 39: Appleton RoadRC-2 to LUG-3 or VTEC

Residentially developed

Located in COD Surrounded by open

space LUG-3 would allow for

modest ground cover expansion

VTEC would allow for significant ground cover expansion and limited commercial uses

Page 9: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 40: Fairgrounds Road, Old South Road, and Tom’s Way

RC-2 to CN, R-5, and/or CTEC

Page 10: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 40: Fairgrounds Road RC-2 to CN and R-5

TON owned land CN portion

programmed for government functions

R-5 portion programmed for housing

Page 11: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 40: Old South Road RC-2 to CN

Contains mixed uses

Generally meets CN standards

Connects to other CN areas

Average lot size = 10,580 square feet

Average ground cover ratio = 22.1%

Page 12: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 40: Tom’s Way to R-5, CN, or CTEC

Residential in character

Meets R-5 standards Lack of infrastructure

to support commercial development

Median lot size = 7,840 square feet

Median ground cover ratio = 13.34%

Page 13: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 41: West Miacomet Road and Somerset Road

RC-2 to R-10

Page 14: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 41: West Miacomet Road and Somerset Road

RC-2 to R-10

Residential in character

Adjacent to R-10 district

Generally meets R-10 standards

Average lot size = 29,620 square feet

Average ground cover ratio = 8.2%

Page 15: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 42: Miacomet Golf Club

Page 16: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 42: Miacomet Golf ClubProposed Revision

Page 17: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West

LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40

Page 18: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West

LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40

Recommended in Surfside Area Plan

R-40 portion in TOD LUG-1 portion in COD Potential for 5 new lots Ground cover expansion

possible on all lots

Page 19: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West

LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40

LUG-2 to LUG-1– Average lot size = 77,754 square feet– Average ground cover ratio = 3.1%

LUG-2 to R-40– Average lot size = 43,124 square feet– Average ground cover ratio = 4.4%

Page 20: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1

Page 21: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1

Recommended by Surfside Area Plan

Adjacent to LUG-1 district

Potential for 5-6 new lots

Ground cover expansion for most lots

Average lot size = 46,700 square feet

Average ground cover ratio = 6.2%

Page 22: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1

Adjacent to LUG-1 district Will correct zoning non-

conformities Will allow the TON to create

one additional lot Median lot size = 56,628

square feet Median ground cover ratio =

1.9%

Page 23: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 45: Somerset Road and Somerset Lane

LUG-2 to R-40 and COD to TOD

Page 24: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 45: Somerset Road and Somerset Lane

LUG-2 to R-40 and TOD to COD

Located in TOD Adjacent to R-20, R-

10, CN, and RC-2 districts Ground cover

expansion possible Lot division potential

through ANR Average lot size =

83,852 square feet Average ground cover

ratio = 3.8%

Page 25: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 46: MonomoyLUG-1 to VR

Page 26: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 46: MonomoyLUG-1 to VR

Will correct non-conformities

Located in COD Adjacent to VR

district Potential for 1 new

lot Ground cover

expansion possible Average lot size =

31,014 square feet Average ground

cover ratio = 8.5%

Page 27: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 47: Intensity Regulations – R-5

Amends side yard setback for the R-5 district only

Side yard setback of 10’ on one side can be reduced if:– A secondary dwelling or other accessory

structure is located within 20 feet of the rear property line; or

– Where a common driveway easement of at least 10 feet provides access to 2 or more lots

Page 28: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Article 48: Secondary DwellingsCitizen Article

Intent is to reduce the scalar separation requirement of 12 feet between the primary and secondary dwelling

Includes 2 options:– Reducing the requirement to 10 feet– Removing the requirement

Both options require amendment to definition of breezeway

Page 29: Nantucket Planning Office 2010 ATM Warrant Article Review January 21, 2010

Articles 49 and 50: Open Space Requirements for MRD and Cluster Subdivisions

Intent is to redefine the open space requirement for MRD and Cluster subdivisions

Includes 2 amendments:– Adding a minimum upland requirement– Adding a standard of review for the open space

parcel