Upload
christopher-gordon
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nantucket Planning Office2010 ATM Warrant Article Review
January 21, 2010
Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations
Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations
Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations
Article 37: Split Zoning District Corrections – Various Locations
Article 38: Eel Point RoadLUG-2 to LUG-3
Article 39: Appleton RoadRC-2 to LUG-3 or VTEC
Article 39: Appleton RoadRC-2 to LUG-3 or VTEC
Residentially developed
Located in COD Surrounded by open
space LUG-3 would allow for
modest ground cover expansion
VTEC would allow for significant ground cover expansion and limited commercial uses
Article 40: Fairgrounds Road, Old South Road, and Tom’s Way
RC-2 to CN, R-5, and/or CTEC
Article 40: Fairgrounds Road RC-2 to CN and R-5
TON owned land CN portion
programmed for government functions
R-5 portion programmed for housing
Article 40: Old South Road RC-2 to CN
Contains mixed uses
Generally meets CN standards
Connects to other CN areas
Average lot size = 10,580 square feet
Average ground cover ratio = 22.1%
Article 40: Tom’s Way to R-5, CN, or CTEC
Residential in character
Meets R-5 standards Lack of infrastructure
to support commercial development
Median lot size = 7,840 square feet
Median ground cover ratio = 13.34%
Article 41: West Miacomet Road and Somerset Road
RC-2 to R-10
Article 41: West Miacomet Road and Somerset Road
RC-2 to R-10
Residential in character
Adjacent to R-10 district
Generally meets R-10 standards
Average lot size = 29,620 square feet
Average ground cover ratio = 8.2%
Article 42: Miacomet Golf Club
Article 42: Miacomet Golf ClubProposed Revision
Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West
LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40
Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West
LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40
Recommended in Surfside Area Plan
R-40 portion in TOD LUG-1 portion in COD Potential for 5 new lots Ground cover expansion
possible on all lots
Article 43: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside West
LUG-2 to LUG-1 and R-40
LUG-2 to LUG-1– Average lot size = 77,754 square feet– Average ground cover ratio = 3.1%
LUG-2 to R-40– Average lot size = 43,124 square feet– Average ground cover ratio = 4.4%
Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1
Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1
Recommended by Surfside Area Plan
Adjacent to LUG-1 district
Potential for 5-6 new lots
Ground cover expansion for most lots
Average lot size = 46,700 square feet
Average ground cover ratio = 6.2%
Article 44: Surfside Area Plan – Surfside South LUG-2 to LUG-1
Adjacent to LUG-1 district Will correct zoning non-
conformities Will allow the TON to create
one additional lot Median lot size = 56,628
square feet Median ground cover ratio =
1.9%
Article 45: Somerset Road and Somerset Lane
LUG-2 to R-40 and COD to TOD
Article 45: Somerset Road and Somerset Lane
LUG-2 to R-40 and TOD to COD
Located in TOD Adjacent to R-20, R-
10, CN, and RC-2 districts Ground cover
expansion possible Lot division potential
through ANR Average lot size =
83,852 square feet Average ground cover
ratio = 3.8%
Article 46: MonomoyLUG-1 to VR
Article 46: MonomoyLUG-1 to VR
Will correct non-conformities
Located in COD Adjacent to VR
district Potential for 1 new
lot Ground cover
expansion possible Average lot size =
31,014 square feet Average ground
cover ratio = 8.5%
Article 47: Intensity Regulations – R-5
Amends side yard setback for the R-5 district only
Side yard setback of 10’ on one side can be reduced if:– A secondary dwelling or other accessory
structure is located within 20 feet of the rear property line; or
– Where a common driveway easement of at least 10 feet provides access to 2 or more lots
Article 48: Secondary DwellingsCitizen Article
Intent is to reduce the scalar separation requirement of 12 feet between the primary and secondary dwelling
Includes 2 options:– Reducing the requirement to 10 feet– Removing the requirement
Both options require amendment to definition of breezeway
Articles 49 and 50: Open Space Requirements for MRD and Cluster Subdivisions
Intent is to redefine the open space requirement for MRD and Cluster subdivisions
Includes 2 amendments:– Adding a minimum upland requirement– Adding a standard of review for the open space
parcel