Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nanoiron in the Subsurface:How far will it go and how does it change?
G. Lowry, Y. Liu, N. Saleh, T. Phenrat, B. Dufour, R. Tilton, K. Matyjaszewski
Carnegie Mellon University
T. Long and B. VeronesiNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US EPA
Conceptual Model
Nanoiron treatment of source or plume is possible
TCE + Fe0 HC Products + Cl- + Fe2+/Fe3+
Conceptual Model
Need to understand transport and fate of nanoironto optimize treatment and understand potential risks
Potential humanexposure
Goal:Maximize treatment, and minimize unwanted exposures
Does Nanoiron Pose a Risk?• Exposure
– What are we potentially exposed to?• What Fe phases and nanoparticle sizes?• Does nanoiron change over time?• How quickly does it change?
– How much are we exposed to?• Nanoiron transport distance?• What hydrogeochemical factors control it?
• Toxicity– Is there toxicity or ecotoxicity?
• What conditions lead to toxicity?
Types of NanoironRNIP
Fe0 coreFe3O4 shell
10 nm
Fe0 coreBorate shell Amorphous
2θ (degree)
20 30 40 50 60 70
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.) (220)(222)
(311)
(400)
(110)
(422)(511) (440)
(200)(a)
(b)
(c)
Crystalline
FeOOH Fe0 Fe0/Fe3O4
Fe2+ + BH4- Fe0/FeBx/Na2B4O7
Fe(B)
Liu et al, (2005) ES&T 39, 1338; Liu et al, (2005) Chem. Mat. 17(21); 5315-5322;Nurmi et al. (2005) ES&T 39, 1221.
Nanoiron After Reaction with TCE in Water
RNIP
+ TCE/H2O
+ TCE/H2O
Fe(B)
Fe0 Corrosion Rate (pH=8-9)RNIP
Fe(B)
Fe0/Fe3O4 + H2O
Fe3O4 + H2
Fe0/FeBx/Na2B4O7 + H2O
Fe-oxide + H2 + B4O72-
Time (days)0 2 4 6 8 10H
2 pr
oduc
ed (a
s %
of t
otal
Fe0
in p
artic
le)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Fe(B) without TCEFe(B)ox without TCEFe(B)cr without TCE
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300 400 500
Time (days)H
2 (as
% o
f Fe0 in
par
ticle
)
Exp1Exp2MODL
~1 year
~1-2 weeks
Fe0 Corrosion Rate Depends on pH
RNIP
~2 weekspH=6.5
~1 yearpH=8.9
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 3 6 9 12 15 18Time (days)
H2 (a
s %
of F
e0 ) pH6.5 pH7.0 pH7.5pH8.0 pH8.5 pH8.9
decreasing pH
How long is Nanoiron Nano?
Concentration=1.9 mg/LStable size=~400 nmTime=15 minutes
Concentration=79 mg/LStable size=~5000 nmTime=10 minutes
Nanoiron Transport is a Filtration Problem
Particle-Media Interactions (Attachment)
Flocculation and straining (cake filtration)
Particle-DNAPL Interactions (Attachment)
Uniqueness- High particle concentrationand flow velocity
Nanoiron Aggregation Affects the Ability to Transport
1”1/2”
Monolayer of sand
Inlet
Outlet
Micro-fluidic PDMS cell
26 μm
26 μm
Time=1 min
Time=10 min
Nanoiron aggregates are filtered
Surface Modifiers Increase Transportability1. Potential Surface Coatings
PolyelectrolyteSurfactantsCellulose/polysaccharides
2. Enhanced transportCharge and steric stabilization minimize particle-particle and particle-media interactions
3. Affinity for DNAPLSurface coatings provide affinity for NAPL
Effect of Different Modifiers[Fe0]=3 g/L
Potential to select transport distance
Hydrogeochemical Effects on Nanoiron Transport
Transportability is a strong function of site hydrogeochemistry.
Systematic evaluation of hydrogeochemical effects is needed
Why suspect that ZVI causes OS?•Surface chemistry
•Reactive oxygen species•Literature-daphne, fish ….. glutathione depletion
Why the brain?• Serious consequences from damage
•Target of OS-lipid content…high energy use
Nanoiron Toxicity?
Nanoiron ToxicityMammalian brain macrophage (microglia)
Fe0 and modified-Fe0 (1-30 ppm)Whole-cell and genomic responses
OS-specific endpointsTEM, confocal microscopy
SDBS Control 24 hr
Unmodified Fe0
SDBS-Fe0 24 hr
SDBS Fe3O4 24 hr
SDBS
-
Fe0 4400x
SDBS Fe3O4 4400x
SDBS Control
HBSS Fe0 4400x
Fe0-induced Oxidative Stress in CNS Cells
Response of Microglia (BV2) and Mesencephalic Neurons (N27) to Iron Nanoparticles
(1-30 ppm)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Fe0 ATP Fe0 MTTred
Fe0OxyBurst
Fe3O4 ATP Fe3O4 MTTred
Fe3O4OxyBurst
Perc
ent o
f Ass
ays
Show
ing
Effe
ct BV2 Response
N27 Response
Future Studies:Apo E Mice and Medaka Fish
Conclusions• Potential toxicity risk warrants careful
evaluation• Fe0 fairly rapidly oxidizes to Fe-oxides
– Fe0 lifetime ranges from weeks to a year– Lifetime depends on nanoiron properties and
geochemical conditions (e.g. pH)– Unmodified nanoiron rapidly aggregates, size is
concentration dependent
Conclusions• Transport of unmodified nanoiron in porous
media is limited.• Particle surface chemistry strongly influences
transportability– function of modifier type and geochemical conditions– May be predictable from filtration/colloid transport theory– Matching surface modifications to site geochemistry
offers the potential for well-controlled placement
Acknowledgement
• U.S. Department of Energy-Environmental Management Science Program (DE-FG07-02ER63507)
• U.S. EPA-STAR (R830898)• CMU project team