16
Changing Expectations for Care at End of Life Nancy D. Zionts Chief Operating Officer Chief Program Officer Jewish Healthcare Foundation © 2013 JHF & PRHI

Nancy D. Zionts Chief Operating Officer Chief Program Officer Jewish Healthcare Foundation © 2013 JHF & PRHI

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Changing Expectations for Care at End of Life

Nancy D. ZiontsChief Operating OfficerChief Program Officer

Jewish Healthcare Foundation

© 2013 JHF & PRHI

High Intensity of End-of-Life Care in Last 6 Months of Life (2005)Comparison to a Community with a Strategy

Pittsburgh USA Portland

% of hospitalized Medicare deaths 29% 29% 22%

Hospital days 11.96 10.81 6.05In-patient Medicare reimbursements

$14,107 $13,805 $10,024

% admitted to intensive care during final hospitalization

18% 17% 12%

% admitted to intensive care 43% 39% 25%

% spending seven or more days in intensive care

15% 14% 5%

Data extracted from: The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences at Dartmouth Medical School; Population-based rates for geographic regions

Hospice days per decedent during the last 6 months of life (2001-2005)

9.26 11.55 13.19

Data extracted from: The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences at Dartmouth Medical School; Provider-based rates for geographic regions;

Why We Started Closure

Specialist: “I saved him, but I am not sure I did him any favors. He didn’t think so, nor did his wife.”

Clergy: “Do care and cure have to be united? I can accept supporting death as caring?”

Family: “Too many decisions are made at the moment of acute terror. We should talk beforehand.”

Social Worker: “Death is still seen as a failure. Our docs can’t deal with it.”

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation 3

This is What We Were Hearing

© 2013 JHF & PRHI

Patients and families suffering at end-of-life and receiving high intensity services at a high cost

The general public unaware of, misinformed about, and under-utilizes palliative care and other end-of-life planning and care resources

Healthcare systems, reimbursements and policies that do not support good end of life outcomes

4

This is What We Were Seeing

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

© 2013 JHF & PRHI

Patients and loved ones are informed about choices and challenges

Resources and support systems are widely accessible in all settings, understood by physicians and families, and appropriately funded

Curricula and planning tools are widely available for professionals and community members

End-of-life issues are openly discussed, with the experience viewed as meaningful and uplifting, whenever possible

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation 5

Our Vision

6

Clarification:There are many types of “Conversations” around end of life

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

7

© 2013 JHF & PRHI

POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) – between doctors and patients

The Conversation Project – individuals telling their stories

Advanced Care Planning – families, physicians, sometimes attorneys

Five Wishes – patient driven

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

Types of Conversations

8

We Called Our Model: Closure

Changing Expectations for Care at End of Life

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

© 2013 JHF & PRHI

Not a single conversation. Consists of a structured series of

Community Experiences Deliberately involved a range of

participants/participant types/sites Results in an action plan and changes in

processes and culture

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

9

How is Closure different?

© 2013 JHF & PRHI

Provider – Where is the training and support to admit “failure,” and to help families

transition from “cure” to “care”? How do I access

other resources to support patients and families

through their life threatening/chronic

illnesses?System – Why is the

“default” setting cure vs. care?

Why does reimbursement incentivize treatment over palliative care?

Society – What is a “good” death; can we

consider death as a part of the lifecycle?

Closure Talking Points

10© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

© 2013 JHF & PRHI11

Physicians and Registered

Nurses

•AIDS Specialists•Cardiology•Critical Care•Emergency Care•Family Medicine•Geriatrics•Hospice Care•Long-Term Care•Oncology•Palliative Care•Pathology•Pediatric Palliative Care•Primary Care•Psychiatry•Surgery

Professional Caregivers

•Adult Day Care•Home Healthcare / Direct Care Workers•Hospice Care•Palliative Care

Service Providers

•Clergy•Estate and Financial Planners•Lawyers•Senior Service Providers•Social Workers

“Family” Caregivers

•Children•Neighbors•Siblings•Spouses

Closure Participants:Attended Six Monthly Sessions/ 18 Hours

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

Closure : Conversations About End-of-Life

12© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

Overview of Issues: How do most Americans

die? What makes a “good” end-of-life experience for

patients, families and practitioners?

The Family and Providers Experiences: Can

caregivers and providers listen and learn from each other’s perspectives and

experience?

Values: How do ethical issues and religious customs

influence end-of-life decisions?

The Planning Tool Kit: What are the essential

documents and resources for successful

preparation? Who helps with this?

Resources and Implementation:

When should we access palliative care services and hospice referrals?

Planning for Culture Change

An Action Agenda

© 2013 JHF & PRHI

Systems defaults are set wrong Doctors avoid communicating

realistic prognosis Advance plans are made too late,

if at all Plans are not communicated effectively, nor

respected Referrals for palliative care and hospice are

too late Medicine focuses on cure vs. care

What We Learned in Closure Community Conversations

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

© 2013 JHF & PRHI 14

We have since created Closure Resources

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

15

© 2013 JHF & PRHI© 2010 Jewish Healthcare Foundation

16

For additional Information on Starting a Closure

Community Conversation [email protected]

Closure.org

© 2013 Jewish Healthcare Foundation