Upload
deb-beacham
View
17
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
specific to why Freeman's transcripts were not in compliance.Murphy v MurphyMurphy v FreemanGeorgia
Citation preview
Nan Freeman did not comply with the OCGA 15-14-5, Duty to transcribe statute
OCGA 15-14-5. Duty to transcribe; certificate. It shall be the duty of each court reporter to transcribe the
evidence and other proceedings of which he has taken notes as
provided by law whenever requested so to do by counsel for any
party to such case and upon being paid the legal fees for such
transcripts. The reporter, upon delivering the transcript to such
counsel, shall affix thereto a certificate signed by him reciting
that the transcript is true, complete, and correct. Subject only to
the right of the trial judge to change or require the correction of
the transcript, the transcript so certified shall be presumed to be
true, complete, and correct.
1.5.5 Nan Freeman, as a part and parcel of her habitual violation of the
laws of Georgia, did not provide Michelle Murphys transcripts with an
OCGA 5-14-5 required certificate containing the certification that the transcript
is true, complete and correct. . as required by OCGA 5-14-5 --- -- The transcript provided and paid for by Michelle Murphy was not true or complete or correct. Nan Freeman has never provided to Michelle Murphy, or other litigants, the required certificate that is an indication of the pattern of her illegal conduct.
The habitual violations of the OCGA 15-14-5 requirements and the authorized fees is relevant to identify that Nan Freeman did not make an one time
error, but instead engaged in a pattern of illegal conduct.
Nan Freeman was therefore is not entitled to any compensation as she prepared
no transcript meeting the OCGA 15-14-5 requirements. If she had complied the following fees that she also did not comply govern.
Nan Freeman, by using a template that consistently produced a transcript that
did not comply with OCGA 15-14-5 that she used to collect more compensation
than she was permitted to receive under the law engaged in illegal conduct and
actionable fraud, negligent misrepresentation of facts, theft by taking, breach of
contract, unjust enrichment and conversion. The laws of Georgia do not deprive
Michelle Murphy from obtaining damages from an official court reporter who
engaged in the conduct that Nan Freeman engaged.