Name : SG1-WG1 Meeting Request · Web viewD2D started to support emergency communication during disaster without eNB support. Chair – If two users are from different operators will

Meeting Agenda

Name : SG1-WG1 Meeting RequestVersion : TSDSI-SG1-MTG1-[WG1]-V1.0.0-20150906

Start Time : 2015-09-07 10:30 am09:00:00

End Time : 2015-09-09 1618:30:00

This agenda is Aapproved in the SG1-WG1 face to face meeting.

Also the SWIPs submitted directly to the Chairs because of Upload issue onto the website.

These SWIPs will be inserted at appropriate places.

List of companies present:

[1.] Tejas Networks (TJN)1.[2.] Intel (IMC)2.[3.] IITH (IITH)3.[4.] Samsung (SMSG)4.[5.] CEWiT (CEWIT)5.[6.] Nokia (Nokia)6.[7.] Reliance Jio (RJIL)7.[8.] Saankhya Labs (SL)8.[9.] R&S (RS)

Total SWIPs submitted 20+ (approx.)

It was agreed that we discuss all the SWIPs and provide 20 minutes per SWIP.

9. IITM (IITM)10. Qualcomm (QC)

Please refer attendance sheet for individual details.

Total SWIPs submitted 20+ (approx.)

It was agreed that we discuss all the SWIPs and provide 20 minutes per SWIP.

Study Items

Study Item : SI7Title : Improving efficiency of system information transmission and acquisition

Version : TSDSI-SG1-SI7-V1.0.0-20150807

Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 12:50:19.058617

Champion: Kiran, IITH

Chair: Will be merged with CIoT SI report.

Champion requested 30 minutes.

Group: Agreed.

Study or Work Item Proposals

Title : Internet of Utillity UE (IoU) for consideration of enhancement to SI, new RACH procedure and CIoTVersion : TSDSI-SI10-SWIP18-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted

Proposer : [email protected]

Proposer Company : Tejas Networks Ltd

Creation Time : 2015-09-04 16:59:36.223577

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-05/vinodkumarm-15-09-04-17-17-TSDSI_SWIP_Internet.docx

Comments:

Chair – This is agreed to be moved as SI7 contribution. Merger may be done at SG1.

CEWIT – Are U-UE always listening to paging?

Presenter – We need to come up with similar mechanism as in LTE… paging occasion and window

IITH – There are other related SWIPs

Chair - We will consider them

Study Item : SI5Title : D2D Communication: Study of Unicast, Relays and V2X


http://tsdsi.org/media/SWIP/2015-09-05/vinodkumarm-15-09-04-17-17-TSDSI_SWIP_Internet.docx

http://tsdsi.org/media/SWIP/2015-09-05/vinodkumarm-15-09-04-17-17-TSDSI_SWIP_Internet.docx

Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 11:09:59.080873

Champion: Sarun, CEWIT


Title : Inputs on Study item plan for âœD2D Communication: Study of Unicast, Relays and �V2Xâ ��Version : TSDSI-SI5-SWIP7-V1.0.0-20150814

Status : Accepted


Proposer Company : Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad

Creation Time : 2015-08-31 13:57:48.349191

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-08-31/SWIP_SI_d2d_waveform.docx

Chairman Notes:

CEWITCEWIT – What is the use case for D2D?

IITH - Not meant for proximity services. We need to do some thinking on all use cases and issues.

Title : Status Update on D2D Communication: Study of Unicast, Relays and V2XVersion : TSDSI-SI5-SWIP12-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted


Proposer Company : Indian Institute of Technology HyderabadCEWIT

Creation Time : 2015-09-04 10:07:03.178293

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-04/TSDSI-SI05-SWIPXX-V1.0.0-20150903.docx

Chairman notes:

Amended the proposer.

CEWIT

IMC – Slide 7 of the presentation does not figure in the SWIP.

IITH - Request the presenter to update the SWIP with this slide

Chair – Is there any objection to include this content in SWIP?

Group – No comments

Chair - Please project the SWIP

Title : Support for D2D Unicast CommunicationsVersion : TSDSI-SI5-SWIP25-V1.0.0-20150906

Status : Accepted


Proposer Company : Indian Institute of Technology HyderabadNOKIA

Creation Time : 2015-09-06 20:43:24.150004

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-06/TSDSI-SI5-SWIP-D2D-V1%200%201.docx

IITH - Will you consider direct D2D without network support?

Presenter – Yes.

IITH – From India perspective: Public safety, Rural communication, TV band, etc. need to be considered. Does current framework support this? Perhaps no. Is Release 13 addressing these or should we address this in TSDSI?

IMC - Agrees.

Presenter – Rel 13 might address Rural comm.

CEWIT – Rel 13 covers D2D Relay. D2D started to support emergency communication during disaster without eNB support.

Chair – If two users are from different operators will D2D work?

Presenter – The UE should have these features enabled for cross-operator

SMSG – What is overlap between mission critical push to talk.

Presenter - Will get back on this.

CEWIT – Cross operator feature is available. Multi hop is not addressed and is important for Rural communication. This is the missing piece.

VC - Are there any other similar D2D SWIPs? We should be able to bring out all use cases and take the next step.

NOKIA - There are many. 3GPP only support public safety. Many features in our presentation are not in 3GPP.

IITH - When we say D2D, the devices must be fully capable to communicate with each other without network support.

Study Item : SI6Title : Control and Management of Large Scale WLAN networks


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 11:25:28.732942

Champion: Nishanth Shah, IITB

Study or Work Item ProposalsThis is with core network.

Study Item : SI8Title : LTE-WLAN Aggregation


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 13:04:08.408001

Champion: Punit, IMC


Title : Way-Forward for prioritizing study topics in LTE-WLAN AggregationVersion : TSDSI-SI8-SWIP23-V1.0.0-20150906

Status : Accepted


Proposer Company : TSDSI

Creation Time : 2015-09-06 13:30:28.988746

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-06/SWIP_LWA_prioritization_intel_v1.docx

SMSG - How is it different from multipath TCP?

Presenter – May be it solves and it may be sufficient.

IITH – MTCP needs to change the TCP at the end point. This requires changes only to lower layer, PDCP, RLC, etc. Ideally there should be no change at the UE.

Presenter - we will look at solution that has minimum impact on any existing elements.

Chair – We shall discuss related SWIP from IITH sent directly to the Chair.

Title: Traffic steering strategies for LTE-Wi-Fi aggregation

Status: Accepted

Proposer: [email protected]

Proposer Company: IITH

Creation time: Sent to Chair

Summary: The main reason for decrease in effective throughput of Wi-Fi network is contentions (and hence collisions) in the uplink. In LTE-WLAN aggregation, traffic steering strategies (TSS 3 & 4) address this issue by designating Wi-Fi to serve users only in the downlink. Since such system is free from contentions, it helps to improve the overall system throughput. Based on initial results obtained from NS-3 experiments, TSS 4, which is TCP aware, is the best among all traffic steering strategies considered in our study. It has increased the network capacity by 14% compared to TSS 3 which is TCP agnostic. If there are no TCP based flows, TSS 3 and TSS 4 are the same. Hence, we suggest that traffic steering algorithm running in TSL of IBX should be aware of application characteristics and Wi-Fi should be used only in downlink with appropriate control signaling in LTE-WLAN aggregation scenarios.

Chair- How is STCP different from what is proposed? This is used in LTE and SAE for carrying Control Plane signaling messages.

Presenter: Will get back on this.

SMSG: Current phones use Cubic TCP (used in current Android phones) and New Reno. Would appreciate if IITH and IMC explore.

IMC: We are not sure if it can be used. We will get back on this.

Study Item : SI2Title : FD MIMO and mmWave Communication

mailto:[email protected]


Status : Suspended

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-06-05 16:25:55.755730

Chair: It was split at SG1 into three SI, Massive Mimo, mmWave Channel Characterization and mmWave system aspects.


Study Item : SI9Title : TV UHF Band Middle Mile Network


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 13:31:22.314391

Champion: Nishanth Shah, IITB

Study or Work Item ProposalsNo SWIPs submitted.

Study Item : SI10Title : Relay enhancements to achieve good wireless backhaul


Status : Initiated

Created By : vinodkumarm, Tejas Networks Ltdkkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 14:44:22.398844

Champion: vinod, Tejas Networks Ltd


Title : Stochastic models for macro cellular base station locations used for system evaluationVersion : TSDSI-SI11-SWIP6-V1.0.0-20150814

Status : Accepted

Proposer :Radha Krishna Ganti

Proposer Company : Indian Institute of Technology Madras

Creation Time : 2015-08-31 13:50:58.726842

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-08-31/SWIP_StochasticGeometry_Cellular.docx

Chair - Moving this SWIP to SI10.

Presented.

VC - Does 3GPP has any such model?

Presenter – 3GPP has grid modelling for BTS.

http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-08-31/SWIP_StochasticGeometry_Cellular.docx

VC – Can we use this for path loss modelling?

CEWIT – They have path loss modelling. It can be used for overlaying PICO over Macro BTS. What is the cell radius for DPP result.

Presenter – For a certain parameter, beta, we can accurately fit and model.

IITH – Various parameters and details are missing. We need to see all the parameters and details that can be used.

Presenter – Wanted to bring high level principle.

Nokia – How 3GPP simulation model and this model differs?

Presenter – PPP and DPP give statistical model and formula to analyze the network. We don’t have to rely on simulation to be able to say what happens in the network.

IMC – Statistical model cannot replace simulation…. Especially end-to-end.

Presenter – Agree.

SL – How well can your model predict Frequency Reuse?

IITH – This model helps predict the result of Simulation result. Helps to understand the HetNet behaviou.

CEWIT – This helps to get end to end result in short time. Agree with IMC’s comment.

IITH - We are interested in HetNet modeling (Macro plus Relay) for which we need a model, which are alternative and quick compared to 3GPP.

Title : Deployment concerns towards network and system design for ultra-low cost Radio Access Element or Relay Node.Version : TSDSI-SI10-SWIP14-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-04 14:40:08.067035

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-04/TSDSI_SWIP_RN_Deployment_concerns_20150904.docx

Chair: This was covered along with other 3 SWIPs under this SI.

Title : Virtual eNodeB towards design of ultra-low cost Radio Access Element or Relay NodeVersion : TSDSI-SI10-SWIP15-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-04 14:54:35.696719

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-04/TSDSI_SWIP_Virtual_eNodeB_for_relaying_20150904.docx


Title : Various ways to classify Relay Node towards design of ultra-low cost Radio Access Element or Relay NodeVersion : TSDSI-SI10-SWIP17-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-04 16:45:12.612238

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-04/TSDSI_SWIP_RN_Existing_Architectures_images_20150904.docx


Title : Deployment examples of Virtual eNodeB towards design for ultra-low cost Radio Access Element or Relay Node.Version : TSDSI-SI10-SWIP19-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-04 17:17:06.512341

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-04/TSDSI_SWIP_V-eNodeB_Deployment_examples_20150904.docx

Presented.

Notes taken by VC.

IMC: From a standardization point of view, where are impacts or changes expected?

TN: Changes needed only at the Relay Node

IMC: How will handovers scenarios be handled?

TN: This is an item for study going forward. It is expected to be no different from eNB based HO.

IMC: How about impacts at the X2 interface? Wont that need to be considered?

TN: X2 interface impacts need to be studied. But it will have a lower priority compared to S1 interface

IIT-H:RN is just like any other UE which will share the same resources in the LTE band. So, how is QoS guaranteed between RN and eNB?

TN: Service Provider owns both the RN and eNB. Hence, it will be possible to configure the network in such a way that the RN has a guaranteed QoS and bandwidth. The benefits of RN

IIT-H: In D2D communication area, topics related to interference and co-existence are being discussed. Won’t similar challenges need to be handled in this solution.

TN: Yes, there are similar aspects that will need to be looked into.

IIT-H: Usage of terms like Virtualized can be misleading as its also used in other contexts like Cloud RAN. A suggestion is if this be reworded to avoid any confusion?

TN: The document shall be updated accordingly

Title : Full Duplex Relaying for Small Cell Self-BackhaulingVersion : TSDSI-SI10-SWIP21-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted

Proposer : [email protected]@ee.iitm.ac.in

Proposer Company : Indian Institute of Technology MadrasHyderabad

Creation Time : 2015-09-05 08:09:28.177731

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-05/SWIP_SI_fd_backhaul.docx

SMSG - Why restrict to cellular application?

IITM – We can show WiFi 802.11ax in our Lab

CEWIT – Pico usually have dedicated fiber.

IITM – No need to lay fiber and use the spectrum

CEWIT – Is it SISO model?

IITM - Yes. MBS to PBS is one antenna. And vice-versa.

IMC – Do you assume FDD always?

IITM - This is abstract model without frame. PPP will always give pessimistic result.

Chair - Is this applicable to TDD?

Presenter - It can be modelled to TDD.

Study Item : SI3Title : Waveform Engineering


Status : Suspended

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-06-05 17:30:22.018806

Chair: This is superseded by SI11


Study Item : SI4Title : LTE Band 40 and WiFi 2.4 GHz Co-existence


Status : Suspended

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-06-05 22:07:29.659778

Chair: This is superseded by SI19.


Study Item : SI11Title : Waveform Engineering for cellular IoT Systems


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 14:54:20.055383


Title : Stochastic models for macro cellular base station locations used for system evaluationVersion : TSDSI-SI11-SWIP6-V1.0.0-20150814

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-08-31 13:50:58.726842

Document :

Title : Waveform Design using Generalized Precoded OFDM (GPO)Version : TSDSI-SI11-SWIP5-V1.0.0-20150814

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-08-31 13:44:05.679693

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-06/SWIP_SI_waveform.docx

Presenter: Two slides

IITM - Are the filters used RF?

Presenter – baseband.

SMSG – Eq. 8 and 9, effectively creates a beam at the Tx and at the Rx separate them.

Presenter –

SMSG - There is savings from ADC perspective at the Rx.

Presenter – We can take this offline

CEWIT –

Presenter – users are spaced as before and let them interfere and this does not cause much loss. It is acceptable.

CEWIT – Will the property change if the allocation was one-sided or two-sided

Presenter -

Study Item : SI12Title : Path Loss Modeling for Indian Terrain


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 15:55:42.474343


Study Item : SI13Title : Open X2 interface specification development


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 16:04:07.576999


Title : Proposal to Solve Interoperability Issue in E-UTRAN NetworkVersion : TSDSI-SI13-SWIP13-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-04 11:51:08.624129

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-04/TSDSI_SWIP_Multivendor_EUTRAN_HO_20150904.docx

Study Item : SI14Title : Millimeter wave system aspects


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 20:37:12.009957


Study Item : SI15Title : Characterization of millimeter wave channels


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 20:45:00.368053


Title : Evaluation Methodology for millimeter wave channel characterizationVersion : TSDSI-SI15-SWIP8-V1.0.0-20150814

Status : Accepted


Proposer Company : Centre of Excellence in Wireless Technology

Creation Time : 2015-08-31 17:01:22.136776


Presenter – MM has been emailed to Chair

IITH – Any information about signal generator and analyzer system?

Presenter - Need to be discussed. We will take the data that is publicly available.

IITH – We requested RS, National Instrument and Agilent to loan generator and analyzer to IIT. Or we can request SMSG and NOKIA.

CEWIT – Reliance may talk to some microwave vendor to loan. Last meeting RS were interested in this. Companies have agreed to share their data.

IITH – We take public data and when we have generator and analyzer, costing about 2 Cr., we can take our measurement. These data are taken elsewhere.

Title : Inputs on study item plan for Millimeter wave system aspectsVersion : TSDSI-SI15-SWIP11-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-03 18:41:00.556132

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-03/SWIP_SI_mmwave_waveform.docx

Title : Evaluation Methodology for millimeter wave channel characterizationVersion : TSDSI-SI15-SWIP8-V1.0.1-20150905

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-06 12:06:27.649474


Title: System Aspects for mmWave systems – areas of focus

Version:

Status: Accepter

Proposer:

Company: RJIL

Chair - Sent to Chair and considered.

CEWIT - Prefer non-standalone (opportunistically use along with legacy)

Reliance – For completion sake we looked at both. No specific e.g.

IITH – need to identify channel, BW, synchronization, frame, etc. and prioritize.

RJIL – We need to look at regulatory inputs/band available. What type of devices, e.g. CPE? We include all inputs in Study Report with right place holders in the template to make progress for each of the areas we are discussing.

IITH – We need to start with some specific bandwidth to start the work.

RJIL –Minimum requirement is to have 1Gbps D/L. We can study the bandwidth.

CEWIT – Per use or cell?

RJIL – Per cell. Another way to calculate BW is look at MBMS and VoLTE application.

SMSG – Request reword “To study the bandwidth required per Gbps as D/L.”

RJIL - Acceptable.

RJIL - 1Gbps in the field.

IITH – cell edge, peak, etc.?

IMC – system throughput or at PHY?

CEWIT - Should we set a minimum BW and multiples of that.

RJIL – Cell average throughput, system throughput assuming MBMS.

Break for lunch. We reconvene at 2:10 pm, 8 Sept 2015.

Study Item : SI16Title : Ultra Low-Cost LTE Networks


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 20:52:01.418995


Title: Ultra Low-Cost LTE Networks – Way forward

Version:

Status: Accepted

Created by: RJIL

Comment: Sent to Chair and then uploaded.

Chair: Would you like to clarify if this is CN or RNES aspect?

IITH: There is overlap so decision can be deferred on this.

Chair: What is host neutrality and spectrum sharing?

RJIL: A host can own the equipment and operators can create a CELL. We don’t want multiple NIBs from different operators at the event location. Spectrum sharing is related to Operator 1 using Operator 2’s spectrum .

Study Item : SI17Title : Work Load Design for NFV performance evaluation


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 20:58:30.908182

This is CN.


Study Item : SI18Title : Massive MIMO


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-13 21:15:45.411437


Title : Inputs on Study Item plan for Massive MIMOVersion : TSDSI-SI18-SWIP10-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-03 18:35:01.342293

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-09-03/SWIP_SI_massive_MIMO.docx

RJIL – Need to consider other KPIs and also consider for mmWave. Will discuss offline.

Title : Way forward for Massive MIMOVersion : TSDSI-SI18-SWIP16-V1.0.0-20150901

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-09-04 16:06:03.450471


Presenter – Was written within the context of sub-6 GHz

SMSG – SI on massive MIMO seems restricted to < 6GHz.

IITH – Need to refer to text of SI.

CEWIT – This SWIP will focus on sub 6 GHz for massive MIMO. There is another SWIP for mmWave system aspect.

Study Item : SI19Title : LTE and WiFi Co-existence


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-14 10:43:01.573545

Champion: Pradeep, RJIL

Chair: Please refer SI19 WI1.


Study Item : SI20Title : Access using Licensed and Unlicensed Bands


Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-14 10:49:08.202387

Champion: Sreekanth, IITH


Title : Access using Licensed and Unlicensed BandsVersion : TSDSI-SI20-SWIP9-V1.0.0-20150814

Status : Accepted



Creation Time : 2015-08-31 20:34:15.942159

Document : http://tsdsi.org//media/SWIP/2015-08-31/SWIP_SI_TSDSI-SG1-SI20-V1.0.0-20150814.docx

Nokia: How is it compared to 3GPP activity.

IITH: This is only for information and understand how it works. We don’t forsee this to evolve into work item. It is only for Informational Study Item report. Through this we can aim TSDSI to have its own understanding.

Work Items

Name : LTE and WiFi Co-existenceVersion : TSDSI-SG1-WI1-[SI19]-V1.0.0-20150814

Status : Initiated

Created By : kkuchi

Creation Time : 2015-08-14 11:32:19.247754

Champion: Pradeep, RJIL

Study or Work Item ProposalsTitle: LTE-WiFi co-existence issue and way forward

Version: TSDSI-WI1-SWIP32-[SI19]-V1.0.0-20150906

Status: Accepted

Created By: RJIL

Comment: Sent to Chair.

There was discussion on dynamic channel switching based on Preamble detection.

IITH - Does WiFi changes channel based on background noise?

RJIL – It uses bg noise to switch channel. It is only during the boot up time. Now we want to do this dynamically.

IITH - It impacts 802.11

RJIL - We modify 802.11 or can do from the backend.

Vice-Chair – There is no detection support and can be left to implementation.

RJIL - This solution of channel switching is not implemented today because chipset needs to reboot today. These are practical issues. Solution space is suggestive.

CEWIT – Can we use DFS that is used for Radar detection/avoidance for this?

RJIL – It is a candidate.

SWIP 31 –

Chair: SWIP from RJIL includes contents of SWIP31. So SWIP31 is not discussed.

Name : Test contribution to a Work ItemVersion : TSDSI-WI1-SWIP24-[SI19]-V1.0.0-20150906

Status : Accepted


Proposer Company : TSDSI

Creation Time : 2015-09-06 13:43:58.928961

Document :

Chair: This was dummy or test upload performed by IMC.

Agreement:

1. One report per SI and be sent to SG12. Group decided to prepare the draft content and send to Chair by tomorrow morning.3. Following are the Reports to be sent to SG1

1) Note: i. For SI7:

1. No report. 2. Refer to SI11 report for SWIPs submitted against SI7.

Sr. No Study Item Number

Work Item Number

Study Item Report Version Champion

1 SI5 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI5-V0.1.0-20150909 Sarun, CEWIT2 SI7 - No Report. Refer SI11. Vinod Kumar, Tejas3 SI8 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI8- V0.1.0-20150909 Punit, IMC4 SI10 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI10-V0.1.0-20150909 Vinod Kumar, Tejas5 SI11 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI11-V0.1.0-20150909 Kiran, IITH6 SI13 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI13-V0.1.0-20150909 Vinod Kumar, Tejas7 SI14 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI14-V0.1.0-20150909 Satish, RJIL8 SI15 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI15-V0.1.0-20150909 Swathi, CEWIT9 SI16 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI16-V0.1.0-20150909 Satish, RJIL10 SI18 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI18-V0.1.0-20150909 Chandrasekaran, CEWIT11 SI19 WI1 TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI19-WI1-V0.1.0-20150909 Pradeep, RJIL12 SI20 - TSDSI-SG1-WG1-SI20-V0.1.0-20150909 Sreekanth, IITH

4. Template recommendations1) IMC, RJIL:We need a better template to reflect all the information, including the automatic fields2) Chair: We will leave the templating aspects to Secretariat and suggestions from WG1 will be

forwarded to them.5. All editorial comments or comments for clarification from this Chairman Note need to be reflected in the

future editorial updates of the SI reports. 6. All documents must be in “Third Person” in the future editorial updates of the SI reports. 7. Technical comment can be entertained via SWIP.8. SG1-WG1-Meeting schedule was approved and emailed to SG1 Chairs

MEETING DATES LOCATION

SG1-MTG1 22-JUL to 24-JUL 2015 IIIT-B, BANGALORE

SG3-MTG 23-JUL 2015 IIIT-B, BANGALORE

SG1-SG3-JOINT F2F 24-JUL 2015 IIIT-B, BANGALORE

SG1-WG1-MTG1 7-SEP TO 9-SEP 2015 Starlit Suites,BANGALORE

SG1-WG1-MTG2, collocate w ith SG1 2-NOV TO 7-NOV BANGALORE

SG1-WG1-MTG3 18-JAN TO 23-JAN BANGALORE

SG1-WG1-MTG4 14-MAR TO 18-MAR BANGALORE

JAN 2016

MAR 2016

JUL 2015

SEP 2015

NOV 2015

9. Meeting requirement request to Secretariat:1) Bell2) Projector with Screen3) WiFi4) Two mikes for Chairs and one standing mike for Members5) Tea/Coffee/Snacks6) Dedicated table for chairs7) Chart board plus markers8) Notepads and pencils9) Water

10. This Chairman’s Note is approved to be sent to SG1 along with the Reports as output from this meeting.

11. This meeting ends at 4:30 pm on 9th September 2015.12. Chairman: M Vinod Kumar, TJ, Vice-Chairman: Sudeep Divakaran, IMC

Documents

Name : SG1-WG1 Meeting Request · Web viewD2D started to support emergency communication during disaster without eNB support. Chair – If two users are from different operators will