Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sion Humphreys MSc NPQH DPSE
NAHT – Policy Advisor
t: 01444 472437 / 07595 657805
w: naht.org.uk
• The intention was not to produce a ‘plug in and play’, ‘off the peg’
solution.
• Principles and recommendations emerged.
• Chaired by Lord Stewart Sutherland.
• Members included NAHT officials; serving school leaders;
representatives from ASCL; Teach First, Chartered Institute of
Educational Assessors; National Children’s Bureau and the Institute
of Education.
• Launched on 13/2/14: available on NAHT’s website.
Commission recommendations
• National curriculum tests and teacher assessment (1-6)
• Teacher assessment and moderation (7-9)
• Role of accountability and inspection (10-13)
• Teacher training (14-16)
• The role of information technology (17)
• Going forward (18-21)
National curriculum tests and teacher assessment
• Schools should review their assessment practice against the
principles and checklist set out in this report. Staff should be
involved in the evaluation of existing practice and the
development of a new, rigorous assessment system and
procedures to enable the school to promote high quality
teaching and learning.
• All schools should have clear assessment principles and practices
to which all staff are committed and which are implemented. These
principles should be supported by school governors and accessible
to parents, other stakeholders and the wider school community.
The big questions....
• Do we produce too much data?
• How much of it is information?
• If so, why?
• What is the main focus of assessment?
• Is it sufficiently closely aligned with the core business?
• ‘…they (sub-levels) took on a life of their own and teachers
used them as we now know in a most unreliable way.
Unfortunately, they have become ingrained in practice as much
as anything because they fit nicely into spreadsheets; hence
the pre-occupation with the number of kids on a level/sub-level
rather than information about what children actually know or
need to know. In short, quantitative has won the day over
qualitative. The problem is, most of the numbers are
meaningless...’
•
NAHT and assessment without levels
The NAHT Commission on Assessment - February 2014
Recommendation 4
Pupils should be assessed against objective and agreed criteria rather
than ranked against each other
Recommendation 6
In respect of the National Curriculum, we believe it is valuable – to aid
communication, comparison and benchmarking – for schools to be
using consistent criteria for assessment. To this end, we call upon the
NAHT to develop and promote a set of model assessment criteria
based on the new National Curriculum
13
14
3
Red
14
92
Green
Emerging Fruit
Beware mad numbers! Meaning must be added - be careful when
comparing two numbers that come from different contexts.
Lif
e a
fter
lev
els
– N
AH
T e
dg
e/F
RO
G R
oad
sh
ow
. M
ick W
alk
er
2015
• All those responsible for children’s learning should undertake
rigorous training in formative, diagnostic and summative
assessment, which covers how assessment can be used to support
teaching and learning for all pupils, including those with special
educational needs. The government should provide support and
resources for accredited training for school assessment leads and
schools should make assessment training a priority.
Going forward – medium term
• A system wide review of assessment should be undertaken. This
would help to repair the disjointed nature of assessment through all
ages, 2-19.
A ‘design checklist’
• This is a framework for translating key principles
underpinning assessment into an assessment
model.
• What are the principles?
Underpinning principles for assessment
Assessment is:
• at the heart of teaching and learning;
• fair;
• honest;
• ambitious;
• appropriate;
• consistent;
Assessment outcomes provide meaningful and understandable
information for a range of users and audiences;
Assessment feedback should inspire greater effort .........more can be
achieved.
Design checklist – notes and commentary
• There is a need to translate the curriculum into ‘discrete, tangible
statements of attainment’. These will be assessment criteria. NAHT
is commissioning a model document to avoid too much variation.
• A ‘hierarchy of expectations’ based on the school year. However,
children progress at different rates and this must be reflected in a
‘hierarchy of expectations.’
• An assumption of frequent formal assessment, perhaps termly and
against the year’s criteria.
• Criteria should be capable of being combined into qualitative
statement of a pupil’s achievements. A qualitative summary may
also be necessary. The ‘binary’ ‘yes/no’ approach is too simplistic
and the Commission favours a three phase judgement of:
• Working towards (or ‘emerging’ or ‘developing’)
• Meeting (or ‘mastered’; ‘confident’; ‘secure’; ‘expected’)
• Exceeded.
• Moderation practice will depend on the size and circumstances of
the school. Large schools may be able to sustain an internal model.
• However, all schools should commit to a proportion of external
moderation each year.
Content of the
curriculum is
taken from the
school’s
curriculum which
is matched to the
New National
Curriculum (NNC)
Any gaps between
the school
curriculum and the
NNC must be filled
The curriculum
content will reflect
the entire year’s
delivery
Term one
The content here is driven by
the topic or theme used to
deliver the curriculum and
provide assessment
opportunities
Term two
Again, the content is driven
by the theme used to deliver
the curriculum
Term three
Again, the content is driven
by the topic or theme. At the
end of the year, the entire
curriculum for that year will
have been covered
Assessment criteria are
taken from the NNC
Key Performance Indicators
(KPIs) describe a group of
individual criteria
Separate KPIs make up the end of year
Performance Standards (PS), that is the expected
performance at the end of the year and against
which assessments are made at the end of the year
An individual pupil’s work can be kept
to exemplify attainment against the
KPI and PS. This can be known as the
exemplification of performance. This
work should be annotated to highlight
the achievement
From individual pupil’s work the
school can create a standards file
showing achievement in all subjects
at each level. This will create a
benchmark for assessment purposes
in future years
The standards file can be used as
and when necessary to take part in
cross school moderation activities,
when the standards can be agreed or
altered according to decisions at the
moderation
Term one
KPIs clearly
stated for each
topic or theme
Term two
KPIs clearly
stated for each
topic or theme
Term three
KPIs clearly
stated for each
topic or theme
National and school curriculum - measuring and recording progress across key stages – NAHT assessment model
22
Content of the curriculum is taken
from the school’s curriculum which
is matched to the New National
Curriculum (NNC)
Any gaps between the school
curriculum and the NNC must be
filled
The curriculum content will reflect
the entire year’s delivery
-
Assessment criteria are taken from
the NNC
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
describe a group of individual
criteria
National and school curriculum - measuring and recording progress across key stages NAHT assessment model
Term three
Again, the content is driven by the
topic or theme. At the end of the
year, the entire curriculum for that
year will have been covered
Term three
KPIs clearly stated
for each topic or
theme
Term one
The content here is driven by the
topic or theme used to deliver the
curriculum and provide
assessment opportunities
Term one
KPIs clearly stated
for each topic or
theme
Term two
Again, the content is driven by the
theme used to deliver the
curriculum
Term two
KPIs clearly stated
for each topic or
theme
25
Separate KPIs make up the end of year Performance Standards (PS), that
is the expected performance at the end of the year and against which
assessments are made at the end of the year
An individual pupil’s work can be kept to exemplify attainment against
the KPI and PS. This can be known as the exemplification of
performance. This work should be annotated to highlight the
achievement
From individual pupil’s work the school can
create a standards file showing achievement
in all subjects at each level. This will create a
benchmark for assessment purposes in
future years
The standards file can be used as and when
necessary to take part in cross school
moderation activities, when the standards
can be agreed or altered according to
decisions at the moderation
Extract from the year 1 programme of study
Reading – word reading
Statutory requirements
Pupils should be taught to:
• apply phonic knowledge and skills as the route to decode words
• respond speedily with the correct sound to graphemes (letters or groups of letters) for
all 40+ phonemes, including, where applicable, alternative sounds for graphemes
• read accurately by blending sounds in unfamiliar words containing GPCs that have
been taught
• read common exception words, noting unusual correspondences between spelling
and sound and where these occur in the word
• read words containing taught GPCs and –s, –es, –ing, –ed, –er and –est endings
• read other words of more than one syllable that contain taught GPCs
• read words with contractions [for example, I’m, I’ll, we’ll], and understand that the
apostrophe represents the omitted letter(s)
• read aloud accurately books that are consistent with their developing phonic
knowledge and that do not require them to use other strategies to work out words
• re-read these books to build up their fluency and confidence in word reading.
The National Curriculum in England Framework Document September 2013 . English Page 21
26
Extract from the year 1 programme of study
Reading – word reading
Statutory requirements
Pupils should be taught to:
• apply phonic knowledge and skills as the route to decode words
• respond speedily with the correct sound to graphemes (letters or groups of letters) for all
40+ phonemes, including, where applicable, alternative sounds for graphemes
• read accurately by blending sounds in unfamiliar words containing GPCs that have been
taught
• read common exception words, noting unusual correspondences between spelling and sound
and where these occur in the word
• read words containing taught GPCs and –s, –es, –ing, –ed, –er and –est endings
• read other words of more than one syllable that contain taught GPCs
• read words with contractions [for example, I’m, I’ll, we’ll], and understand that the apostrophe
represents the omitted letter(s)
• read aloud accurately books that are consistent with their developing phonic knowledge
and that do not require them to use other strategies to work out words
• re-read these books to build up their fluency and confidence in word reading.
Then Reading – Comprehension….
27
Key performance indicators
28
Responds speedily with the correct sound to
graphemes (letters or groups of letters) for all
40+ phonemes, including, where applicable,
alternative sounds for graphemes.
Reads accurately by blending sounds in
unfamiliar words.
Reads common exception words.
Reads aloud accurately books that are
consistent with their developing phonic
knowledge and that do not require them to
use other strategies to work out words.
Develops pleasure in reading, motivation to
read, vocabulary and understanding by:
1.listening to and discussing a wide range of
poems, stories and non-fiction at a level
beyond that at which they can read
independently;
With reference to the KPIs:
By the end of Y1 a child should be able to read
all common graphemes and be able to read
unfamiliar words containing these graphemes,
accurately and without undue hesitation, by
sounding them out in books that are matched
closely to the level of word reading knowledge.
A child should be able to read many common
words containing GPCs taught so far, such as
shout, hand, stop, or dream, without needing to
blend the sounds out loud first. Reading of
common exception words, such as you, could,
many, or people, should be secure meaning a
child can read them easily and automatically.
A child can read words with suffixes with support
to build on the root words that can be read
already.
Performance standard
National and school curriculum - measuring and recording progress across key stages – NAHT assessment model
29
Reporting progress: numerical reporting
1. Is working towards…
2. Has met the expected standard for year…
3. Has exceeded…
Align with school assessment framework
There are known knowns.
These are things we know that
we know. There are known
unknowns. That is to say, there
are things that we know we
don't know. But there are also
unknown unknowns. There are
things we don't know we don't
know.
Donald Rumsfeld
Known unknowns......................
• The relationship with Performance Descriptors and the ‘national
standard’
• Mastery
• An opportunity to make transition work
https://www.ncetm.org.uk/public/files/19990433/Developing_mas
tery_in_mathematics_october_2014.pdf
• Teachers reinforce an expectation that all pupils are capable of
achieving high standards in mathematics. The large majority of
pupils progress through the curriculum content at the same pace.
• Differentiation is achieved by emphasising deep knowledge and
through individual support and intervention.
• Teaching is underpinned by methodical curriculum design and
supported by carefully crafted lessons and resources to foster deep
conceptual and procedural knowledge.
• Practice and consolidation play a central role. Carefully designed
variation within this builds fluency and understanding of underlying
mathematical concepts in tandem.
• Teachers use precise questioning in class to test conceptual and
procedural knowledge, and assess pupils regularly to identify those
requiring intervention, so that all pupils keep up.