Upload
laura-payne
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NAFTA AND THE GOSPEL OF FREE TRADE
The Lost Decade (1980s) and Its Legacies
Dynamics of the debt crisis
The Washington Consensus The Role of the State Liberalization of Trade Privatization, the private sector, and foreign
investment
North American Free Trade (NAFTA)? Why? Why Then?
Global Scenario: Economic multipolarity and rivalry (Japan, EU) Geopolitical uncertainty Emphasis on “geoeconomics”
U.S. Perspectives: Supplement to FTA with Canada Support for neoliberal reforms in Mexico Growing Mexican-American population within U.S.
Mexican Perspectives: Exhaustion of alternatives Need to stimulate growth Perpetuation of Salinista policies
NAFTA: What Is It?
A “free trade” area: Not a customs union Nor a common market
Characteristics:• Uneven levels of development• Cultural and political variation• Hub-and-spoke arrangements (with U.S. at center)• Absence of supranational authority (preservation of sovereignty)
Assessing Results: The Problem of Cause-and-Effect
NAFTA in comparison with:
• Initial expectations (and political rhetoric)
• Liberalization (mid-1980s)
• Global and/or U.S. economic conditions
• Long-term economic and social trends
• Short-term shocks (e.g., Mexican peso crisis of 1994-95)
Economic Performance: Expansion of Trade
General effects:• More efficiency (in production and consumption)• Greater market size (thus higher returns)• Tougher competition
Questions:
1. Who takes part in the trade? (55 % large firms, 40% maquiladoras, > 5% small firms (~ 2.1 million firms)
2. What about trade diversion?
U.S. EXPORTS TO MEXICO
Quoting from Carla Hills, former USTR:
“Last year [2013], roughly 14 percent of U.S. exports went to Mexico—more than went to Brazil, Russia, India, and China combined. Indeed, Mexico buys more U.S. goods than the rest of Latin America combined, and more than France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom combined.”
GDP Growth in Mexico1945-1980 ~ 6.5%
1995 -7.0 % 1996 5.1 1997 6.8 1998 4.9 1999 3.8 2000 6.6 2001 -0.2 2002 0.7 2003 1.5 2004 4.6 2005 2.8 2006 5.0 2007 3.2 2008 1.3 2009 -6.8 2010 5.5
Note: Growth does not necessarily reduce poverty, and often increases inequality.
Unforeseen Shocks:
Mexican peso crisis of 1994-95September 11, 2001Drug-related violence, 2008-presentGlobal financial crisis, 2008-present (?)
Current Challenges:
Expansion of the development gapInfrastructure (including roads)MigrationEnergySecurity problems
Key Points of Disputation:
•Environmental protection
•Labor rights
•Overall development strategy
•Dependence on United States
•Development gap
•Consolidation of U.S. hegemony
Recent Research
“NAFTA has basically failed to fulfill the promise of closing the Mexico-U.S. development gap…”
Zero economic convergence (GDP per capita), no reduction in incentives for Mexicans to migrate… except for U.S. unemployment rate
Modest impact on employment (500,000 in both countries) Lag 2000-08:
Emergence of China Increased value of peso
Reasons for lack of convergence: Badly implemented reforms Reform paralysis Lack of a domestic engine
Future prospects: U.S.-Mexico trade a two-way street Convergence could reduce migration Health and elder care
POLITICAL EFFECTS
The Public Assertion: Free Trade = Democracy
The Silent Bargain: International Dimensions
• Political stability and social peace
• Access to petroleum
• Leverage vis-à-vis economic rivals
• Compliance on foreign policy
Hemispheric Integration? Or Division?
1. Expansion of NAFTA (through new memberships)
2. FTAA negotiating process (RIP)
3. Bilaterals and minilaterals:• U.S.-Chile• U.S.-Central America (+ Dominican Republic)• U.S.-Peru• U.S.-Colombia• U.S.-Panama• Alianza del Pacífico (Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru + others?)