1
Nadia Mcallister, Sumaira Macdonald, Carol Ewen Accuracy of coding for IR procedures is crucial in determining the correct healthcare resource group (HRG) tariff from which the cost of a hospital spell is reimbursed to the trust. Accuracy of coding for Interventional Radiology (IR) procedures to reflect on co-morbidities and complications (CC) during a hospital spell Materials and methods 100 consecutive cases dating March-April 2012 Collected from IR database 59 cases used excluded devices 93 out of 100 cases were suitable for a final analysis of HRG tariffs: 2 cases were not coded as were considered as OP admissions, 5 cases had ≥2 IR procedures done during one hospital spell and therefore had duplicate coding summaries. Results Aims Conclusions Explore the coding pathway for IR-related admissions. Investigate the process of recording and reimbursement of the excluded devices list to the IR department. Investigate the accuracy of recording of Co- morbidities and Complications to reflect on the appropriate tariff applied. 3 out of 59 cases were missed from the excluded devices list (2%), generating a total loss of £3187.92 (including VAT) to the IR department. Estimated loss of £41,688 to the IR department annually. 6 out of 93 cases (7%) were allocated the incorrect HRG tariff generating a net loss of £11,970 (excluding VAT) to the trust. * Estimated loss to the trust annually. Action Plan Raise awareness amongst staff: Importance of clear documentation in the notes Full record of co-morbidities Accurate recollection of complications Importance of registering all devices used during an IR procedure Improve discharge letter template to account for CC. Improve electronic sources (Diadem) for the recording of co-morbidities. Employ reliable and cost-effective strategies to improve the existing system for recording of excluded devices. Manual collection of data by the designated team in Interventional Radiology. Introduction of the bar code system for IR department. ? Cost Accurate identification of excluded devices allows patients’ access to novel and effective yet expensive technologies. The root cause analysis was carried out for all cases identified which included failures at both junior and senior levels. * Sensitive information ID number: 1757450

Nadia Mcallister, Sumaira Macdonald, Carol Ewen

  • Upload
    sook

  • View
    38

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Explore the coding pathway for IR-related admissions. Investigate the process of recording and reimbursement of the excluded devices list to the IR department. Investigate the accuracy of recording of Co-morbidities and Complications to reflect on the appropriate tariff applied. . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Nadia Mcallister, Sumaira Macdonald, Carol Ewen

Nadia Mcallister, Sumaira Macdonald, Carol Ewen

Accuracy of coding for IR procedures is crucial in determining the correct healthcare resource group (HRG) tariff from which the cost of a hospital spell is reimbursed to the trust.

Accuracy of coding for Interventional Radiology (IR) procedures to reflect on co-morbidities and complications (CC) during a hospital spell

Materials and methods

• 100 consecutive cases dating March-April 2012• Collected from IR database • 59 cases used excluded devices• 93 out of 100 cases were suitable for a final analysis of HRG tariffs: 2 cases

were not coded as were considered as OP admissions, 5 cases had ≥2 IR procedures done during one hospital spell and therefore had duplicate coding summaries.

Results Aims

Conclusions

• Explore the coding pathway for IR-related admissions.• Investigate the process of recording and reimbursement of the excluded

devices list to the IR department.• Investigate the accuracy of recording of Co-morbidities and Complications to

reflect on the appropriate tariff applied.

• 3 out of 59 cases were missed from the excluded devices list (2%), generating a total loss of £3187.92 (including VAT) to the IR department.

• Estimated loss of £41,688 to the IR department annually. • 6 out of 93 cases (7%) were allocated the incorrect HRG

tariff generating a net loss of £11,970 (excluding VAT) to the trust.• * Estimated loss to the trust annually.

Action Plan

• Raise awareness amongst staff:• Importance of clear documentation in the notes• Full record of co-morbidities • Accurate recollection of complications• Importance of registering all devices used during an IR procedure

• Improve discharge letter template to account for CC.• Improve electronic sources (Diadem) for the recording of co-

morbidities. • Employ reliable and cost-effective strategies to improve the

existing system for recording of excluded devices. • Manual collection of data by the designated team in Interventional Radiology. • Introduction of the bar code system for IR department.

• ? Cost

• Accurate identification of excluded devices allows patients’ access to novel and effective yet expensive technologies.

• The root cause analysis was carried out for all cases identified which included failures at both junior and senior levels.

* Sensitive information

ID number: 1757450