Upload
dobao
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Date September 2017 | Author NAB Behavioural & Industry Economics © National Australia Bank Limited ABN 12 004 044 937 AFSL and Australian Credit Licence 230686 1
NAB CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR SURVEY Q2 2017
Consumer anxiety (based on concerns over future spending and savings) rose slightly in the June quarter, however it remains well below long-term averages. Overall, Australians worried less about their current financial position, but the gap between low and high income earners widened. Low anxiety helped drive positive spending behaviours - while more consumers spent on essentials (particularly utilities), fewer cut back on non-essentials. In line with these behaviours, fewer consumers reported any financial hardship, but for those most worried about their finances (especially low income earners), utility bills are the key concern.
OVERALL CONSUMER ANXIETY How anxious are we that our spending/savings will be impacted by our jobs, health, retirement and cost of living? NAB’s Consumer Anxiety Index rose very slightly in Q2 2017, but remains comfortably below its long-term average. This reflected heightened concerns about health, cost of living and government policy, which offset lower worries relating to retirement funding and job security. The cost of living continues to weigh most heavily on consumers (more than 1 in 5 are “highly” concerned), and highlights the disconnect between low levels of economy-wide inflation and consumer focussed costs.
HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL POSITION How concerned are we about our current financial position and the factors that are driving these concerns? While Australians were less worried about their household financial position, women worry more than men, 30-49 year olds replaced young people as the most anxious age group, and the gap between the highest income group and the lowest widened. Overall consumers were less concerned about almost all key drivers of financial stress. The ability to finance retirement is still the biggest driver of financial anxiety, followed providing for their family’s future and raising $2,000 for an emergency.
HOUSEHOLD SPENDING BEHAVIOURS How is our household financial position impacting our overall spending behaviours? Low levels of consumer anxiety appear to have supported more positive spending behaviours. More consumers increased spending on “essentials” (with a big increase in utilities and to a lesser extent, groceries), but also when it came to “non-essential” spending. The number of consumers that cut back on “non-essentials” still out-weighed those who spent more, but less so in all spending categories - especially eating out, personal goods, travel and home improvements.
FINANCIAL HARDSHIP How prevalent is financial stress and hardship and what has the biggest impact on those that worry the most? Fewer Australians said they experienced some form of financial hardship in Q2 2017 - 1 in 3 people. Low income earners were hardest hit, with almost 1 in 2 experiencing some form of hardship. By age and gender, 30-49 year olds were most impacted and over 50s least impacted. Women continue to struggle more than men. Not being able to pay a bill was the most frequent cause of hardship, followed by not having enough for food and basic necessities. For those consumers “extremely” concerned about their current financial position, almost 1 in 2 said utility bills impacted their financial position the most.
RESPONDING TO FINANCIAL STRESS How would we respond if we were under financial stress and where would we most likely borrow money from? Most consumers would deal with financial stress themselves - 3 in 4 would cut unnecessary expenses and 2 in 3 would follow a stricter budget. Just 1 in 6 would talk over their financial worries with a financial adviser and less than 1 in 10 would talk to their bank or borrow money. Of concern, only 1 in 4 would admit they have a problem and would borrow from family or friends.
NAB CONSUMER ANXIETY INDEX Q2 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017
Overall Index 60.2 55.9 56.1 - Job security 48.7 42.6 41.9 - Health 57.4 53.9 55.2 - Ability to fund retirement 61.8 58.7 57.1 - Cost of living 66.4 63.2 64.2 - Government policy 66.6 61.4 62.2
NAB Behavioural & Industry Economics Embargoed until 11.30 am 27 September 2017
INSIGHTS INTO THE MINDSET OF AUSTRALIAN CONSUMERS – THEIR ANXIETIES AROUND FUTURE SPENDING AND SAVINGS PLANS, WHAT DRIVES THESE CONCERNS AND HOW THEY ARE IMPACTING ACTUAL SPENDING BEHAVIOURS AND FINANCIAL HARDSHIP.
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
2
HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL POSITION (FINANCIAL ANXIETY) (100 = extreme anxiety)
Q2 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 63.1 60.7 58.9
DRIVERS OF HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL STRESS (100 = extremely concerned)
Q2 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017
Medical bills/healthcare 55 42 38 Mortgage, rent, housing costs 49 37 35 Credit card repayments 39 30 27 Personal loan repayments 42 35 28 Children's education 46 36 30 Food/basic necessities 43 34 32 Monthly household bills 47 39 37 Non-essentials (holidays, eating out) 48 41 37 Raising $2,000 in emergency 52 46 43 Financing retirement 60 53 49 Providing for family's future 55 45 45
HOUSEHOLD SPENDING BEHAVIOURS (Net balance - spending more/spending less)
Q2 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Non-essential spending -19 -19 -15 Essential spending 4 3 8 Financial spending -3 -5 -3 Overall Spending Behaviours -10 -10 -6
HOUSEHOLD SPENDING BEHAVIOURS - SPENDING CATEGORY (Net balance - spending more/spending less)
Q2 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Travel -13 -13 -9 Eating out (coffee, take-away, restaurants, etc.) -26 -27 -22 Entertainment (movies, sports, concerts, etc.) -24 -24 -21 Groceries (food, alcohol etc.) 0 -1 5 Home improvements and maintenance -10 -8 -4 Major household items (appliances, furniture etc.) -24 -23 -20 Utilities (electricity, gas, phone, etc.) 5 8 24 Personal goods (clothes, toiletries, sports, pets, etc.) -17 -21 -17 Medical expenses (doctors, pharmacy, optical etc.) 9 9 10 Transport (car running costs and public transport) 5 2 5 Children (school fees, childcare, activities etc.) -1 -3 -2 Paying off debt 8 8 8 Use of credit -12 -18 -15 Savings, investments and super contributions -5 -6 -3 Charitable donations -21 -23 -20
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
3
PART 1: CONSUMER ANXIETY How anxious are Australian consumers that their spending and savings will be impacted by their job security, health, retirement and cost of living ?
NAB’s Consumer Anxiety Index - which measures concerns about future spending and savings plans arising from job security, health, retirement, cost of living and government polices - rose very slightly in Q2 2017, reversing the trend of falling anxiety since mid-2015.
The Index increased to 56.1 points in Q2 2017 (55.9 points in Q1 2017). However, overall consumer anxiety is still well below levels reported at the same time last year (60.2points) and comfortably below its long-term average (60.8 points).
Increased anxiety in Q2 2017 reflected heightened consumer concerns about health, cost of living and government policy, which offset lower worries relating to retirement funding and job security.
The cost of living (64.2 points) is still weighing most heavily on consumers, and also highlights the big disconnect between low levels of economy-wide inflation and consumer focussed costs. More than 1 in 5 (22%) consumers reported “high” levels of concern over the cost of living.
Government policy (62.2 points) was the next biggest cause of anxiety and a “high” concern for around 23% of all Australian consumers.
In contrast, job security (41.9 points) caused the least stress, which likely reflected strong employment growth in the first half of the year and improved labour market conditions also seen in NAB’s Business Survey for some time. Overall, 7 in 10 (70%) consumers reported “low” or “very low” levels of anxiety over their job security. As a result, anxiety levels relating to job security now sits at a new survey low.
The level of concern arising from retirement funding (57.1 points) also receded in Q2 2017 with almost 1 in 2 (49%) consumers reporting “low” or “very low” anxiety.
But when it came to health (55.2 points), the number of consumers reporting “low” or “very low” anxiety fell to 53%, down from 62% in Q1 2017.
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
Q1
2013
Q2
2013
Q3
2013
Q4
2013
Q1
2014
Q2
2014
Q3
2014
Q4
2014
Q1
2015
Q2
2015
Q3
2015
Q4
2015
Q1
2016
Q2
2016
Q3
2016
Q4
2016
Q1
2017
Q2
2017
NAB CONSUMER ANXIETY INDEX
average
series low (Q1 2017)
series high (Q2 2014)
Consumer Anxiety
40
50
60
70
80
40
50
60
70
80
Q1
2013
Q2
2013
Q3
2013
Q4
2013
Q1
2014
Q2
2014
Q3
2014
Q4
2014
Q1
2015
Q2
2015
Q3
2015
Q4
2015
Q1
2016
Q2
2016
Q3
2016
Q4
2016
Q1
2017
NAB CONSUMER ANXIETY INDEX: COMPONENTS
Anxiety Job Security Health
Ability to Fund Retirement Cost of Living Government Policy
100 = "extreme" anxiety
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
4
Across all consumer groups, anxiety was highest for labourers (62.4 points), those earning less than $35,000 p.a. (60.4 points), men aged 30-49 (59.9 points) and divorced people (59.0 points). It was lowest for widows (49.0 points), men over 50 (50.9 points), those earning more than $100,000 (51.7 points) or living in TAS (53.2 points).
Among key demographic groups, anxiety by state increased and remained highest in SA/NT (58.4 points). Consumers living in SA/NT also rated their concerns about health, retirement funding and cost of living highest of all states. In contrast, anxiety was lowest in TAS (53.2 points), where consumers were also least concerned about all factors except government policy.
Anxiety continues to be higher for women (56.5 points) than for men (55.7 points), despite a small improvement during the quarter. Elevated anxiety among women reflected higher concerns about their ability to fund their retirement and living costs.
Middle-aged consumers (30-49) reported the highest anxiety (58.8 points) by age, especially in relation to retirement funding and cost of living. Middle-aged men (59.9 points) were the most anxious. In contrast, anxiety fell sharply for young women (54.1 points) because of much lower stress over their cost of living, retirement funding and job security. They are now the least anxious group after men over 50 by gender and age.
By income, there was a very strong relationship between earnings and anxiety. Anxiety was lowest in the highest income group (51.7 points) and highest in the lowest income group (60.4 points). Low income earners reported the highest levels of stress across all factors, except job security.
Elsewhere, consumers living in capital cities remain the most anxious by region (56.7 points), particularly in regards to their job security.
54.455.0
57.057.2
62.4
54.555.8
56.9
54.955.856.1
56.856.9
54.556.4
58.2
55.256.5
49.053.8
55.357.8
59.0
50.954.1
54.756.5
57.559.9
53.854.4
58.8
55.756.5
51.754.5
57.559.2
60.4
54.355.2
56.7
53.255.355.555.6
56.858.4
56.1
40 45 50 55 60 65
TechnicalProfessional
Sales / clericalOther (i.e. self emp)
Labourer
Not employedFull time workerPart time worker
High schoolBachelor / post grad
High school leaverDiploma
Vocational
H/hold size (two)H/hold size (three+)
H/hold size (one)
No childrenHave children
WidowedDefactoMarried
SingleDivorced
Men (50+)Women (18-29)
Men (18-29)Women (50+)
Women (30-49)Men (30-49)
aged over 50aged 18 -29aged 30 - 49
MenWomen
over $100,000$75-100,000
$50-75,000$35-50,000
earning <$35,000
Rural town / bushRegional city
Capital city
TASWAVIC
QLDNSW/ACT
SA/NT
ALL CONSUMERS
NAB CONSUMER ANXIETY INDEX: ALL GROUPS
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
5
Another factor impacting consumers is the state of the Australian economy.
In this report, consumers were asked to tell us for the first time how concerned they were about the general economic situation in Australia.
Overall, they scored 61.7 points (where 100 is “extremely” concerned), suggesting it contributed “moderately” to their anxiety.
But there are important differences in key groups.
By state, consumers living in SA/NT (65.8 points) expressed the highest concern about the economy - they were also the most anxious overall. Consumers in VIC (59.5 points) were the least concerned.
There was a clear relationship between the economy and income - it was a far greater concern in the lowest income group (66.1 points), but moderated as incomes grew.
Interestingly, the economy was a bigger factor for over 50s (particularly women), despite having the lowest levels of consumer anxiety by age group. Young Australians worried the least.
There was no difference between women and men (61.7 points).
THE VIEW FROM NAB ECONOMICS Official data on consumer spending picked up in the June quarter to a solid (though not exceptional) growth rate of 0.7% quarter-on-quarter in real terms.
While some of this spending may be tied to the dwelling construction cycle, stronger growth in discretionary spending categories is an encouraging sign following a tilt towards spending on essentials over non-essentials in recent years.
The pick-up in spending is in line with strong employment growth in the first half of this year. However, monthly retail data suggests a notable slowing in the months of June and July following strength in April and May.
It is also likely that higher energy prices will weigh on discretionary spending in Q3. The increase in the minimum wage should assist lower paid workers to some extent (despite the loss of penalty rates for some), although the general trend for wages and household income growth is for only very gradual improvement.
We expect slow growth in household consumption of just over 2% in real terms in the coming year despite further gains in employment, before picking up to 2¾% by 2019, as households remain cautious amidst high household debt levels.
LOWER SAVINGS RATE DRIVING CONSUMER SPENDING (yoy % change & % of disposable income)
61.7
61.7
61.7
58.0
60.4
64.7
58.1
58.2
61.5
63.0
66.1
59.5
61.1
62.0
62.2
62.3
65.8
50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0
All Consumers
Women
Men
18to29
30to49
50+
earn $100,000+
earn $75-100,000
earn $50-75,000
earn $35-50,000
earn less than $35,000
VIC
WA
QLD
TAS
NSW/ACT
SA/NT
HOW ANXIOUS ARE CONSUMERS ABOUT THE GENERAL ECONOMIC SITUATION IN AUSTRALIA
(0 = not at all; 100 = extremely)
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
6
PART 2: HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL POSITION How concerned are consumers about their current financial position and what are the factors that are driving these concerns ? Australians were less worried about their household financial position (financial anxiety) in Q2 2017.
When asked to rate their level of concern relating to their future spending and savings plans arising from their current financial position, they scored 58.9 points out of 100 (100 is “extremely” concerned), down from 60.7 points in Q1 2017.
The overall result suggests Australians are experiencing “moderate” levels of financial anxiety.
But the overall result also hides some important differences between men and women, by age and by income.
While financial anxiety moderated for women and men, women (61.2 points) still worried more about their financial position than men (56.5 points).
By age, anxiety fell noticeably for 18-29 year olds (59.6 points) - led by women who said all stress drivers contributed less to their overall anxiety - especially personal loan repayments and retirement financing. However, young women (61.6 points) continue to be more anxious than young men (57.2 points).
30-49 year olds (63.0 points) replaced young people (59.6 points) as the most anxious age group in Q2 2017, with 30-49 year old men (63.1 points) the most anxious.
Australians over the age of 50 were the least anxious group by some margin (55.0 points), particularly men (50.3 points).
Financial anxiety also moderated in most income groups - except for Australians earning less than $50,000 per annum where it increased a little.
As a result, the financial anxiety gap between the highest income group (52.6 points) and the lowest income group (67.1 points) widened.
58.9
61.2
56.5
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017
FINANCIAL ANXIETY: GENDER(0 = "not at all" concerned and 100 = "extremely" concerned)
Financial Anxiety Women Men
58.9
59.6
63.0
55.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017
FINANCIAL ANXIETY: AGE(0 = "not at all" concerned and 100 = "extremely" concerned)
Financial Anxiety 18-29 30-49 50+
58.9
67.1
61.559.8
55.8
52.6
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017
FINANCIAL ANXIETY: INCOME(0 = "not at all" concerned and 100 = "extremely" concerned)
Financial Anxiety less than $35,000 $35,000-$49,999
$50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 over $100,000
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
7
Australian consumers were less concerned about all key drivers of financial stress in Q2 2017 - except when it came to providing for their family’s future (unchanged).
Their level of concern fell most in regards to personal loan repayments, children’s education, non-essentials, medical and healthcare bills and financing their retirement.
Overall, consumers again nominated their ability to finance retirement as the biggest single driver of financial anxiety, followed by their ability to provide for their family’s future and raise $2,000 for an emergency.
Women expressed higher levels of concern than men for all anxiety drivers, except for meeting minimum credit card and personal loan repayments and financing their children’s’ education.
By age, middle-aged Australians (30-49 years old) were noticeably more concerned about being unable to finance their retirement, provide for their family and pay for their children’s education and healthcare than all other age groups.
Young Australians were however the most concerned when it came to their ability to raise money for an emergency and not being able to meet personal loan repayments. Older Australians expressed the lowest concern for all drivers.
Not surprisingly, the lowest income earning group was much more concerned about most drivers of financial stress than everyday Australians - particularly when it came to raising $2,000 for an emergency, their monthly household bills and financing their retirement.
However, they were less worried about their children’s education and credit card and personal loan repayments than the average Australian.
20
30
40
50
60
70
Fina
ncin
g re
tire
men
t
Pro
vidi
ng f
or
fam
ily's
fut
ure
Rais
ing
$2,0
00 in
em
erge
ncy
Med
ical
bill
s/he
alth
care
No
n-es
sent
ials
(ho
liday
s, e
atin
g o
ut)
Mo
nthl
y ho
useh
old
bill
s
Mo
rtga
ge, r
ent,
ho
usin
g co
sts
Food
/bas
ic n
eces
siti
es
Child
ren'
s ed
ucat
ion
Pers
ona
l lo
an r
epay
men
ts
Cred
it c
ard
repa
ymen
ts
DRIVERS OF HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL STRESS
Q2-2016 Q1-2017 Q2-2017
100 = "extremely" concerned
20
30
40
50
60
70
Fina
ncin
g re
tire
men
t
Rais
ing
$2,0
00 in
em
erge
ncy
Pro
vidi
ng f
or
fam
ily's
fut
ure
Mo
nthl
y ho
useh
old
bill
s
Med
ical
bill
s/he
alth
care
Food
/bas
ic n
eces
siti
es
No
n-es
sent
ials
(ho
liday
s, e
atin
g o
ut)
Mo
rtga
ge, r
ent,
ho
usin
g co
sts
Child
ren'
s ed
ucat
ion
Pers
ona
l lo
an r
epay
men
ts
Cred
it c
ard
repa
ymen
ts
DRIVERS OF HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL STRESS: Q2
earn less than $35,000 All Australians
100 = "extremely" concerned
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
8
PART 3: HOUSEHOLD SPENDING BEHAVIOURS How has the household financial position of Australian consumers impacted their overall spending behaviours ?
Relatively low levels of consumer anxiety (despite a small uptick) and lower concerns about their current financial position appear to have supported more positive household spending behaviours in Q2 2017.
NAB’s measure of Household Spending Behaviours (which counts the number of consumers that spent more against those that spent less) continued to paint a picture of a conservative consumer - albeit steadily improving since late-2016. This result is consistent with solid - albeit softer than expected - household spending also recorded in the Q2 2017 national accounts.
NAB’s overall spending indicator rose to -6 in Q2 2017 (from -10 in Q1 2017), indicating that the number of consumers that cut back their overall spending still out-numbered those that increased their spending.
While more consumers increased their spending on “essentials” (+3 to +8), there were also positive signs when it came to “non-essential” spending, with a further reduction in the number of consumers cutting back (-19 to -15) during the quarter.
Financial spending behaviours (consisting of paying of debt, using credit cards and savings, investments and super contributions) also improved from -5 to -3.
When it came to what they were actually spending on, we noted a big increase in the number of consumers spending more on “essentials”, particularly utilities and to a lesser extent groceries.
Consumers cutting back on “non-essentials” still out-weighed those who spent more, but the number that cut back in Q2 2017 fell in all spending categories - especially eating out, personal goods, travel and home improvements.
When it came to “financial” spending, more Australians on balance increased their usage of credit cards and added to their savings, investments and superannuation. Their behaviours towards paying off debt were unchanged.
-15
8
-3-6
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Q3'14 Q4'14 Q1'15 Q2'15 Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2'16 Q3'16 Q4'16 Q1'17 Q2'17
HOUSEHOLD SPENDING BEHAVIOURS
Non-essentials Essentials
Financial Behaviour Spending Behaviour
spending more net balance
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30Eating out
Entertainment
Major HH items
Charitable donations
Personal goods
Use of credit
Travel
Home improvementsSavings, super,investments
Children
Groceries
Transport
Paying off debt
Medical expenses
Utilities
HOUSEHOLD SPENDING BEHAVIOURS(SPENDING MORE/SPENDING LESS - NET BALANCE)
Q1'17 Q2'17
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
9
Typically much of our spending on “non-essentials” is considered to be “lifestyle” purchases rather than essential to everyday life.
But what types of lifestyle spending are most highly valued by Australian consumers, and which would they be prepared to sacrifice in order to improve their financial position?
Broadly speaking, around 1 in 2 consumers said they would be prepared to spend “much less” on most of their lifestyle purchases - particularly on things such as taxis and Uber, take away food, fitness, fashion, restaurants and bars, entertainment and alcohol.
But they would be far less inclined to severely curtail their spending on internet and mobile phones.
Interestingly, spending habits do not differ significantly across age groups.
And it was particularly revealing that young people shared very similar attitudes to lifestyle spending to middle aged consumers.
Australian consumers were also asked what type of “lifestyle spending” they would fear losing the most.
Here, a different picture emerges.
While consumers in all age groups most fear losing internet or mobile phones, the prospect causes greater trepidation for young Australians, particularly when it comes to losing their mobile phones.
Young people were also more fearful when it came to nearly all other types of lifestyle spending, except when it came to holidays, coffee and alcohol, where over 50s led.
Interestingly, around 1 in 5 (24%) over 50s did not fear losing any lifestyle sending, compared to just 15% of 30-49 year olds and 15% of 18-29 year olds.
17%
22%
39%
41%
41%
45%
46%
46%
47%
47%
49%
50%
54%
31%
33%
28%
23%
24%
25%
24%
25%
27%
27%
14%
26%
14%
49%
41%
27%
28%
29%
25%
24%
24%
21%
21%
25%
20%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Internet
Mobile phone
Holidays
Home entertainment (Foxtel, Netflix etc.)
Coffee
Personal (hair, make-up, massage etc.)
Alcohol
Entertainment (movies, sport, concerts…
Restaurants & bars
Fashion (clothes, shoes etc.)
Fitnes (gyms, sports etc.)
Take-away food
Taxis, Uber etc.
EXTENT CONSUMERS WOULD CUT BACK ON "LIFESTYLE SPENDING" TO HAVE MORE LEFT FOR SAVINGS, RETIREMENT, HOUSING, HEALTH ETC.
Much less A little less No change Don't know
3%
12%
11%
13%
8%
13%
16%
13%
8%
13%
15%
22%
44%
50%
2%
6%
6%
7%
7%
8%
10%
9%
8%
8%
15%
26%
32%
35%
1%
3%
4%
4%
7%
7%
9%
9%
10%
15%
24%
30%
30%
42%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Taxis, Uber etc.
Take-away food
Fashion (clothes, shoes etc.)
Fitnes (gyms, sports etc.)
Personal (hair, make-up, massage etc.)
Restaurants & bars
Entertainment (movies, sport, concertsetc.)
Home entertainment (Foxtel, Netflix etc.)
Alcohol
Coffee
None
Holidays
Mobile phone
Internet
"LIFESTYLE SPENDING" CONSUMERS FEAR LOSING MOST - BY AGE
50+ 30-49 18-29
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
10
PART 4: FINANCIAL HARDSHIP How prevalent is financial stress and hardship, and what has the biggest impact on the financial position of those that worry the most ?
Fewer Australians overall said they experienced any financial hardship in the past 3 months - just 31% in Q2 2017 (or around 1 in 3 people) down from 38% (around 4 in 10) in Q1 2017.
The lowest income earning group (less than $35,000 per annum) was hardest hit , with almost 1 in 2 (45%) experiencing some form of financial hardship in the past 3 months. This compared with just 1 in 3 earning between $35,000-$99,999 and less than 1 in 2 (18%) in the highest income group.
By age, 30-49 year olds were most impacted (42%) and over 50s (20%) least impacted. Just over 1 in 3 young Australians (35%) experienced some hardship, down from more than 1 in 2 (53%) in Q1 2017.
More women (34%) than men (28%) experienced financial hardship.
Being unable to pay a bill was the most frequently cited cause of hardship - for 16% of Australians overall, but for over 1 in 5 (22%) middle aged Australians and for 1 in 4 (24%) lowest income earning Australians. Not having enough for food and basic necessities was the next biggest driver of hardship - affecting 13% in total, but around 1 in 4 (24%) low income earners and 1 in 5 (20%) young people.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Una
ble
to p
ay a
bill
Una
ble
to p
ay m
ort
gage
Una
ble
to p
ay r
ent
No
t en
oug
h fo
r fo
od/
basi
cne
cess
itie
s
Una
ble
to p
ay m
edic
al/h
ealt
hbi
lls
Una
ble
to p
ay c
redi
t ca
rd
Una
ble
to p
ay p
erso
nal l
oan
s
No
ne o
f th
ese
FINANCIAL STRESS EXPERIENCED IN LAST 3 MONTHS
Overall 18-29 30-49 50+ less than $35k over $100k
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
11
Australian consumers who said they were “extremely” concerned about their current financial position were also asked to tell us what issues in particular were having the biggest impact on their current financial position.
Almost 1 in 2 said utility bills (electricity, gas, water, and phone) had the biggest impact. Around 1 in 4 also said inefficient savings, grocery bills and low pensions and/or other benefits also impacted their current financial position.
Utility bills was a far bigger problem for over 50s (61%) and 30-49 year olds (47%) than for 18-29 years olds (26%). But around 1 in 4 young Australians said rental payments, low wages and not enough work impacted their financial position, compared to around 1 in 10 over 50s. Far more middle-aged Australians (15%) cited expenses relating to their children than any other age group.
By income, the lowest income earners (less than $35,000 p.a.) were much more affected by utilities (56%) and low pensions/benefits (47%), whereas a lot more high income earners (over $100,000 p.a.) identified home mortgage repayments (24%) and children’s expenses (18%) than any other income group.
48%
25%
24%
23%
17%
15%
15%
13%
13%
13%
13%
13%
9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 4% 2% 1%
4%
1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Uti
lity
bills
Insu
ffic
ient
sav
ings
Gro
cery
bill
s
Pens
ion
/ o
ther
ben
efit
s to
o lo
w
Rent
al p
aym
ents
Wag
e to
o lo
w
No
t en
oug
h w
ork
Med
ical
exp
ense
s
Leve
l of
pers
ona
l/ho
useh
old
deb
t
Mo
rtga
ge r
epay
men
ts o
n ho
me
Stat
e of
the
Aus
tral
ian
econ
om
y
Insu
ffic
ient
sup
eran
nuat
ion
Tran
spo
rt e
xpen
ses
Child
ren
expe
nses
Abs
ence
of
a pa
y ri
se
Ho
me
impr
ove
men
ts /
mai
nten
ance
Low
inte
rest
rat
es
Stat
e of
the
Glo
bal e
cono
my
Poor
inve
stm
ent
retu
rns
Repa
ymen
ts o
n in
vest
men
t pr
oper
ty
Maj
or
hous
ehol
d it
ems
Oth
er
Do
n’t
know
ISSUES THAT MOST IMPACT CURRENT FINANCIAL POSITION OF THOSE MOST CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR FINANCIAL POSITION - OVERALL
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
12
PART 5: RESPONDING TO FINANCIAL STRESS How would Australian consumers respond if they were under financial stress and where would they most likely borrow money from ?
Overwhelmingly, most Australians said they would try to deal with financial stress themselves - around 3 in 4 (74%) said they would try to cut out any unnecessary expenses, while 2 in 3 (66%) would try to follow a strict budget. Around 43% also said they would try to better understand their own finances.
In contrast, just 16% would talk over their financial worries with a financial adviser and less than 1 in 10 would talk to their bank (9%) or borrow money (8%).
It is of some concern that only 1 in 4 (25%) Australians would admit to themselves they have a financial problem.
There are however some interesting differences in behaviours between men and women, by age and income. In particular, more women (72%) said they would try to budget better than men (61%). Around 77% of women also said they would try to cut back on unnecessary spending compared to 71% of men.
By age, more over 50s would try cut back on unnecessary spending (77%) than 18-29 year olds (69%). Over 50s were also more likely to tighten their budgets (70%), talk to their financial adviser (20%) or admit they had a problem (29%) than any other age group.
In contrast, around 14% of 18-29 year olds said they would try to borrow money compared to just 10% of 30-49 year olds and just 4% of over 50s.
Responses varied little between the highest (earning over $100,000 p.a.) and lowest (earning less than $35,000 p.a.) income groups - except when it came to better understanding their finances (46% of high income earners vs. 35% of low income earners) and talking over financial worries with an adviser (19% vs. 12%) or bank (12% vs.7%). Interestingly, more low income earners (27%) would admit they had a problem than high income earners (24%).
Consumers were also asked how likely they would be to borrow from a number of sources if they were under financial stress. They would most likely borrow from family or friends - albeit they scored the likelihood of doing so just 3.3 points out of 10 (10 is “extremely” likely), followed by taking out a personal loan (2.3 points) and increasing credit card debt (2.1 points). They were least likely to seek out a loan from a pay day lender (1.3 points).
By gender, men and women scored family and friends highest and equally (3.3 points), but men were somewhat more likely to borrow from all other sources than women.
By age, 18-29 year olds were a lot more likely to approach family and friends (4.9 points), than 30-49 year olds (4.0 points) and over 50s (1.8 points). Along with 30-49 year olds, they were also far more likely to borrow from all other sources than over 50s.
The highest income group was more likely to borrow from all sources than were low income earners, particularly when it came to personal loans (2.8 points vs. 1.8 points), increasing credit card debt (2.5 points vs. 1.4 points), transferring debt to a new credit card (2.7 points vs.1.2 points) and applying for an overdraft (2.3 points vs. 1.1 points).
2%
3%
3%
4%
8%
9%
16%
25%
43%
66%
74%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
None of these
Don't know
Nothing at all
Other
Borrow money
Talk over my financial worries with mybank
Talk over my financial worries a financialadvisor or institution
Admit to myself I have a financial problem
Try to better understand my finances(income, expenses, etc.)
Try to follow a stricter budget
Try to cut unnecessary expenses
RESPONDING TO FINANCIAL STRESS(percentage of respondents*)
*multiple responses allowed
1.3
1.8
1.9
2.1
2.3
3.3
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Seek a short-term loan from a pay daylender
Apply for an overdraft
Transfer debt to a new credit card
Increase credit card debt
Take out a personal loan
Borrow money family and friends
HOW LIKELY WE WOULD BE TO BORROW FROM EACH OF THE FOLLOWING IF WE WERE UNDER
FINANCIAL STRESS(0 = not at all likely; 10 = extremely likely)
NAB Consumer Behaviour Survey Q2 2017
13
CONTACT THE AUTHORS Alan Oster Group Chief Economist [email protected] +613 8634 2927
Dean Pearson Head of Behavioural & Industry Economics [email protected] +613 8634 2331
Robert De Iure Senior Economist - Behavioural & Industry Economics [email protected] +613 8634 4611
Brien McDonald Senior Economist - Behavioural & Industry Economics [email protected] +613 8634 3837
Steven Wu Economist - Behavioural & Industry Economics [email protected] +(613) 9208 2929
Important Notice
This document has been prepared by National Australia Bank Limited ABN 12 004 044 937 AFSL 230686 ("NAB"). Any advice contained in this document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on any advice in this document, NAB recommends that you consider whether the advice is appropriate for your circumstances.
NAB recommends that you obtain and consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement or other disclosure document, before making any decision about a product including whether to acquire or to continue to hold it.
Please click here to view our disclaimer and terms of use.