Click here to load reader
Upload
sggdgd
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
polymer
Citation preview
lucstrith
inYue-Zhong Xian , Li-Tong Jin *, Katsunobu Yamamoto
a Department of Chemistry, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, PR China
proposed ow-injection analysis with the NRDS-enzyme electrode array system enables simultaneous monitoring of trace levels of
osine production is central to its function in the nervous
system and can therefore be expected to dier consider-
[8]. In addition, the use of microdialysis probes permits
the release of active agents to the monitoring site and the
calculation of local metabolic turnover rates of the tissue
via clearance methods [9]. In many cases, this sampling
method is generally coupled to high-performance liquid
.
* Corresponding author. Fax: +86 21 6223 2627.
E-mail address: [email protected] (L.-T. Jin).
Journal of Electroanalytical Chem
Journal ofElectroanalytical0022-0728/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reservedglucose, LL-glutamate, lactate and hypoxanthine in rat striatum.
2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Neutral red-doped silica nanoparticle; In vivo microdialysis sampling; Rat striatum; Flow-injection analysis; Enzyme electrode array
1. Introduction
Rapid measurement of glucose, LL-glutamate, and lac-
tate is important in understanding the dynamics of the
energy balance in brain tissue [1,2]. LL-glutamate is alsothe main excitatory neurotransmitter [1,3], while hyp-
oxanthine is a major metabolite in the degradation of
adenine nucleotide [4,5], and the accumulation of aden-
ably from those of conventional neurotransmitters [6].
Therefore, the simultaneous monitoring of glucose, lac-
tate, LL-glutamate and hypoxanthine would be of great
benet for studies on the energy metabolites and neu-
rons communicating in the brain. However, their con-centrations in the extracellular brain environment are
still poorly documented [7]. Microdialysis is a powerful
tool for minimally invasive probing of such metabolismsb Department of Electronic Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, PR Chinac BAS Co., Ltd. No. 36-4, 1-Chome, Oshiage, Sumida-Ku, Tokyo 131, Japan
Received 4 June 2004; received in revised form 23 July 2004; accepted 27 July 2004
Available online 18 October 2004
Abstract
A ow-injection enzyme electrode array system with in vivo microdialysis sampling is proposed for the simultaneous measure-
ment of cerebral glucose, lactate, LL-glutamate and hypoxanthine concentrations. The enzyme electrode array system was based on
neutral red-doped silica (NRDS) nanoparticles as the electrocatalyst. These uniform NRDS nanoparticles (about 50 3 nm) were
prepared by a water-in-oil microemulsion method, and characterized by the transmission electron microscopy technique. The inside
neutral red dopant maintained its high electron-activity, while the outside nano silica surface prevented neutral red from leaching
out into the aqueous solutions and showed high biocompatibility. These nanoparticles were then mixed with the glucose oxidase,
lactate oxidase, LL-glutamate oxidase or xanthine oxidase, and immobilized on the four carbon electrode array, respectively. A thin
Naon lm was coated on the enzyme layer to prevent interference such as from ascorbic acid and uric acid in the dialysate. TheSimultaneous monitoring of ghypoxanthine levels in rat
enzyme electrode array system w
Fen-Fen Zhang a, Qiao Wan a, Chen-Xadoi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.07.039ose, lactate, LL-glutamate andiatum by a ow-injectionin vivo microdialysis sampling
Li a, Xiao-Li Wang a, Zi-Qiang Zhu b,a, c
www.elsevier.com/locate/jelechem
istry 575 (2005) 17
Chemistry
chromatography (HPLC) or capillary electrophoresis
(CE) [1012]. Nevertheless, microdialysis combined with
an enzymatic electrode possesses simplicity of operation
and substrate selectivity of the enzyme [13].
Neutral red has been reported to act as the electrocat-
alyst for NADt/NADH regeneration [1416]. NR alsoshows catalytic activity toward DNA [17]. Compared
to the traditional methods for dye immobilization onto
the electrode surface (electropolymerization [14], adsorp-
tion [17]), dye doped silica nanoparticles synthesized by
using a water-in-oil (W/O) microemulsion method are
advantageous, providing both prolonged long-term sta-
bility and showing high biocompatibility [18].
In the present work, we have rst developed novelelectro-active neutral red-doped silica (NRDS) nanopar-
ticles [1921] in a four enzyme electrode array with high
sensitivity and long-term stability. The experiments indi-
cated that the inside neutral red dopant maintained its
high electron-activity as an electrocatalyst, while the
outside nano silica surface prevented NR from leaching
2. Experimental
2.1. Reagents
Glucose oxidase (GOD, from Aspergillus niger, EC
1.1.3.4. 150 000 U g1), LL-glutamate oxidase (LL-GLOD,EC 1.4.3.11, from Streptomyces sp., 10.8 U mg1), lac-tate oxidase (LOD, from Pediococcus species, 37
U mg1), xanthine oxidase (XOD, EC 1.1.3.22, GradeI from Buttermilk, 1 U (mg protein)1, 34.7 mg pro-tein ml1), b-DD-glucose, LL-glutamate, lactate, hypoxan-thine, ascorbic acid, uric acid and Naon (1% methyl
alcohol) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.
Tetrathyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 98%) was purchasedfrom United Chemical Technologies (Bristol, PA). Bo-
vine serum album (BSA) was obtained from Huamei
Biochemical (Shanghai, China). Glucose stock solution
was allowed to mutarotate for 24 h before use. Other
reagents were of at least analytical-reagent grade. All
solutions were prepared using twice distilled water.
2 F.-F. Zhang et al. / Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 575 (2005) 17out into the aqueous solutions and showed high biocom-
patibility. For in vitro monitoring of brain dialysatewith electrochemical biosensors, LL-ascorbic acid (LL-
AA) causes major interference. Naon lm was
dripped on the four sensor array to exclude such electro-
oxidizable interferants [2123]. The ow-injection per-
formance of this newly prepared NRDS-enzyme
electrode array based on these uniform nanoparticles
and the application to simultaneous determination of
glucose, lactate, LL-glutamate and hypoxanthine in in vi-tro rat brain dialysate were investigated. The FIA sys-
tem with the NRDS-enzyme electrode array showed
high sensitivity, wide ranges of response, and was with-
out electroactive interferences.Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of th2.2. Apparatus
The ow-injection system consisted of a LC-10 AS
eluent delivery pump and an SILL-6B injector equipped
with a 20 ll sample loop (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan).Flow-injection amperometric data were collected using
a CHI 1030 workstation (CH instruments, Inc.).
The homemade thin-layer cell consisted of an SCE as
the reference electrode, a gold ake as the counter elec-trode and four NRDS-enzyme modied carbon-disk
electrodes, 300 lm in diameter, as the working electrodearray. The structure of the homemade thin-layer cell is
shown in Fig. 1. Parts A, B and C were made of Teon,e homemade thin-layer cell.
taxic frame. A microdialysis probe was implanted into
the left striatum (coordinates with the skull leveled be-
tween bregma and lambda, were x = +3.0, y = +0.6,
z = 7 mm) [26]. Dialysate samples were discarded overthe rst 90 min to allow recovery from the acute eects
of the implantation procedure. Samples were then col-lected continually in 20 ll sample receivers, and injectedinto the sample loop by switching the value. In this man-
ner, four analytes in the dialysates were detected simul-
taneously at a radial stream NRDS-enzyme electrode
array. The standard addition method was also used by
injecting increasing concentrations of the four analyte
mixed solution.
3. Results and discussion
troanalytical Chemistry 575 (2005) 17 3and they were xed with four screws to prevent weeping.
Before use, the carbon disc electrode array was succes-
sively polished with emery paper and 0.5 lm aluminapowder, and sonicated in twice distilled water.
The microdialysis system consisted of a CMA/101
microdialysis pump (Sweden) and a CMA/11 microdialy-sis probe (Sweden) with amembrane diameter of 0.24mm
and a length of 3.0 mm. Ringers solution was used as theperfusion solution at the rate of 1.0 ll min1. The compo-nents were 140 mmol l1 NaCl, 1.0 mmol l1 MgCl2, 1.2mmol l1 CaCl2 and 5.0 mmol l
1 NaHCO3, pH 7.4.Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images
were recorded by a JEOL JEM-100CX-II Electron
Microscope (Japan).
2.3. Synthesis NRDS nanoparticles
Silica nanoparticles were prepared according to the lit-
erature [24]. The W/O microemulsion was prepared rst
by mixing 7.5 ml of cyclohexane, 1.8 ml 1-hexanol and
1.77 ml of Triton X-100 completely. Then 400 ll neutralred solution (1.0 102 mol l1) was added slowly to theabove mixed solution in an ice cooled ultrasonicator
bath. In the presence of 100 ll TEOS, a polymerizationreaction [25] was initiated by adding 60 ll NH4OH.The reaction was allowed to continue for 24 h. After
the reaction was completed, the NRDS nanoparticles
were isolated from the microemulsion with acetone,
and washed thoroughly (56 times) with both ethanol
and water to remove any surfactant molecules or anyphysically adsorbed NR from the particle surfaces.
2.4. Construction of a Naon/NRDS-enzyme electrode
array
A typical NRDS-modied GODLODLL-GLOD
XOD four enzyme sensor array was prepared as follows.
A solution of 50 ll PBS with NRDS nanoparticles in 50ll PBS containing 10 mg BSA and 1 mg GOD for theGOD electrode (0.4 mg LOD for the LOD electrode,
0.2 mg LL-GLOD for the LL-GLOD electrode, or 10 llXOD for the XOD electrode), was mixed with 20 ll5% glutaraldehyde solution. About 1 ll of the resultingenzyme solution with NRDS nanoparticles was coated
onto the CE surface and air-dried at room temperature.
The enzyme and NRDS nanoparticle coated carbonelectrode array was further modied with a thin layer
of Naon by dripping 1 ll of 1% (w/v) Naon/metha-nol solution and allowing the solvent to dry in air. When
not in use, it was stored in PBS in the dark at 4 C.
2.5. FIA with a Naon/NRDS-enzyme electrode array
system for simultaneous detection of biological samples
A male SD rat weighing about 250 g was anesthetized
F.-F. Zhang et al. / Journal of Elecwith urethane (1.5 g kg1, i.p.) and placed in a stereo-3.1. Characterization and electrochemical behavior of
nanoparticles
Neutral red-doped silica nanoparticles prepared by
the microemulsion method were extremely uniform insize, 50 3 nm in diameter, and were characterized by
TEM (Fig. 2). Based on a calculation done on 60 indi-
vidual nanoparticles, the relative standard deviation
(RSD) of their size distribution was less than 2.8%.
Fig. 3 depicts cyclic voltammograms (CV) of the bare
GCE (a) and the Naon/XOD-NRDS sensor (b) in
PBS (pH 6.9). At a scan rate of 100 mV s1, almost sym-metric waves and 70 mV peak-to-peak separations be-tween the potentials of the anodic (Epa) and the
cathodic peaks (Epc) exhibited the features of rapid
charge transfer at surface-bound species [21]. The results
showed that NRDS nanoparticles kept their high elec-
tron-transfer eciency. In addition, no obvious of the
peak currents was observed after 50 cycles, indicating
that NR is not leached out from the SiO2 network under
these conditions. Furthermore, in the 5.0 106 mol l1Fig. 2. TEM image of neutral red-doped silica nanoparticles (NRDS).
tively; despite the use of the same operating potential,
there was no apparent cross reactivity between the four
sensing parts, which gave four reproducible peaks simul-
taneously. In the absence of the NRDS-modied four
enzyme sensor array, the amperometric response for
5.0 103 mol l1 glucose decreased to 23%, 2.0 103
mol l1 lactate decreased to 66%, 5.0 103 mol l1 LL-glutamate lactate decreased to 12% and 1.0 103
mol l1 hypoxanthine lactate decreased to 37%(Fig. 4). This indicated that the NRDS nanoparticles
present electrocatalytic activity toward the four ana-
lytes. The catalytic eect might be attributed to a high
eciency of the electron-transfer mediator NRDS nano-
particles. On the other hand, it might be due to thehydrophobic silica nanoparticles providing a biocom-
patible environment and improving the enzyme activity
[18,28,29].
3.4. Linearity, detection limits of Naon/NRDS-enzyme
electrode array by FIA system
Typical ow-injection responses for the Naon/NRDS-enzyme electrode array with an applied potential
4 F.-F. Zhang et al. / Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 575 (2005) 17hypoxanthine solution, a striking change in the vol-tammogram occurs, Fig. 3(c). Both anodic and cathodic
currents were increased. The increases of the peak cur-
rents were dependent on the hypoxanthine concentra-
tion. The other three sensors showed CV responses
similar to that of Naon/XOD-NRDS. This is the
main characteristic of the electrocatalytic reaction by
mediators [27].
3.2. Optimization of ow-injection analysis
In the FIA system, the ow rate used for measure-
ment the four analytes is an important parameter since
the process involves the enzymatic reaction kinetics
and the diusion of the glucose, lactate, LL-glutamate
and hypoxanthine and their products through the
NRDS-modied enzyme electrode array. An optimalow rate of 1.0 ml min1 was obtained by evaluatingthe analytical performance of the sensor array, peak
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3
-18
-12
-6
0
6
12
c
b
a
-I /
nA
E / V vs. SCE
Fig. 3. Cyclic voltammograms for: (a) bare GCE in PBS; (b) Naon/
XOD-NRDS/GCE in PBS; (c) Naon/XOD-NRDS/GCE in
5.0 106 mol l1 hypoxanthine solution. Scan rate: 100 mV s1.width and the measurement sensitivity.
The eect of the detection potential was assessed
from the ow injection hydrodynamic voltammogram.
The glucose anodic response started at +0.10 V, rose
sharply to +0.70 V, and leveled o at higher values
(not shown). All subsequent work, thus, employed adetection potential of +0.70 V. A similar potential (on
the current plateau) was used for the detection of lac-
tate, LL-glutamate and hypoxanthine too.
3.3. Amperometric response on Naon/NRDS-enzyme
electrode array and Naon/enzyme electrode array
When a mixed solution (5.0 103 mol l1 glucose,2.0 103 mol l1 lactate, 5.0 103 mol l1 LL-gluta-mate and 1.0 103 mol l1 hypoxanthine) was injectedinto the sample loop, the sensing parts of the Naon/
NRDS-enzyme electrode array responded selectively to
glucose, lactate, LL-glutamate and hypoxanthine, respec-Fig. 4. Amperometric response on the Naon/NRDS-enzyme elec-
trode array (a) and Naon/enzyme electrode array (b) by the FIA
system with 20 ll injections of: (A) 5.0 mM glucose, (B) 2.0 mMlactate, (C) 5.0 mM LL-glutamate and (D) 1.0 mM hypoxanthine.
Applied potentials (for four sensor array), +0.70 V vs SCE. The mobile
phase was 0.1 M phosphate buer pH 6.9. The ow rate was 1ml min1.
of 0.7 V is shown in Fig. 5 The four sensor array re-
sponded rapidly to injections of the corresponding tar-
get analytes, with a nearly instantaneous rise in the
current. The linear calibration curves, correlation coe-
cients and detection limits of the four analytes are sum-
marized in Table 1. The sensitivities for the four analytesare superior to FIA-UV, for which the analytical data
are not shown here.
3.5. Reproducibility and stability of Naon/NRDS-
enzyme electrode array
The reproducibility is ascertained by monitoring the
current response for ten replicate injections of the four
analyte mixture consisting of 1.0 103 mol l1 glucose,2.0 103 mol l1 lactate, 5.0 103 mol l1 LL-gluta-mate and 1.0 103 mol l1 hypoxanthine. The relativestandard deviations (RSD) of the peak currents are 2.5%
for glucose, 3.1% for lactate, 2.4% for LL-glutamate and
4.6% for hypoxanthine, indicating a good reproducibil-
ity and stability of Naon/NRDS-enzyme electrode ar-
ray for FIA.
In addition, the sensitivity of the Naon/NRDS-en-
Fig. 5. Simultaneous ow-injection analysis of glucose + lactate + LL-
glutamate + hypoxanthine mixed solutions. (A) Response to increasing
levels of glucose: 0.5 mM (a), 2.0 mM (b), 4.0 mM (c), 6.0 mM (d), 8.0
mM (e), and 10.0 mM (f). (B) Response to increasing levels of lactate:
0.5 mM (a), 2.0 mM (b), 4.0 mM (c), 6.0 mM (d), 8.0 mM (e), and 10.0
mM (f). (C) Response to increasing levels of LL-glutamate: 1.0 mM (a),
2.0 mM (b), 4.0 mM (c), 6.0 mM (d), 8.0 mM (e), and 10.0 mM (f).
(D) Response to increasing levels of hypoxanthine: 0.1 mM (a), 0.2
mM (b), 0.4 mM (c), 0.6 mM (d), 0.8 mM (e), and 1.2 mM (f). Other
conditions as in Fig. 4.
Table 1
Analytical data of the four analytes in FIA with the Naon/NRDS-enzym
Analytes Regression equation (ax + ba)B Correlation coecient
Glucose y = 6.5536x + 0.1781 0.9988
F.-F. Zhang et al. / Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 575 (2005) 17 5y = 1.7299x + 0.4555 0.9967
Lactate y = 1.1502x + 0.2158 0.9949
y = 0.6132x + 0.2906 0.9970
LL-glutamate y = 17.843x + 1.4845 0.9902
y = 1.5557x + 1.8773 0.9981
Hypoxanthine y = 0.0861x + 0.2488 0.9923
y = 0.5314x + 0.2042 0.9974
A FIA conditions as in Fig. 5.
B Where y and x represent the peak current and the concentration of thezyme electrode array shows no observable change after
two weeks of storage in PBS at 4 C or after successivepotential cycles, indicating that this array is very stable
and shows long shelf-life.
3.6. Study on the interference
In the Naon/NRDS-enzyme electrode array, theoutside Naon lm could prevent both anionic electro-
active interferences from reaching the electrode surface
and fouling of the array [2123]. The presence of 0.2
mM ascorbic acid and 0.2 mM uric acid in the buer
containing 1.0 mM glucose, 1.0 mM lactate, 5.0 lM LL-glutamate and 5.0 lM hypoxanthine did not aect theFIA response current, suggesting that, especially at
low glucose, lactate, LL-glutamate and hypoxanthine con-centrations, there was little interference from AA, etc.,
which increased the sensitivity in measuring the concen-
trations of the four analytes in in vitro dialysate
samples.
3.7. Determination of glucose, lactate, LL-glutamate and
hypoxanthine level in living samples
The microdialysis probe was implanted into the brain
of an anesthetized S.D. rat of about 250 g. The dialysate
was collected at a perfusion rate of 2.0 ml min1 after
e electrode array systemA
(r) Linear range (mol l1) 107 Detection limit/mol l1 (r = 3)
1.0 1061.0 104 5.05.0 1041.0 102
1.0 1068.0 105 5.01.0 1041.0 102
5.0 1072.0 105 2.05.0 1051.0 102
5.0 1075.0 105 2.01.0 1041.2 103analytes, respectively.
troanalytical Chemistry 575 (2005) 176 F.-F. Zhang et al. / Journal of Elec1.5 h. Fig. 6. shows the FIA responses to glucose, lac-
tate, LL-glutamate and hypoxanthine of the dialysate
sample. Recovery studies were also carried out by add-
ing known amounts of glucose, lactate, LL-glutamate
and hypoxanthine mixture to the dialysate sample. The
results showed good recoveries, ranging from 97.1% to
103.8% for the four analytes (see Table 2), which corre-
late well with those in the literature [1,3033].
4. Conclusions
It was found from the results that the present FIA
with a Naon/NRDS-enzyme electrode array system
[5] L.Q. Mao, Katsunobu Yamamoto, Anal. Chim. Acta 415 (2000)
143.
10.
[11] J.X. Zhou, D.M. Heckert, H. Zuo, C.E. Lunte, S.M. Lunte,
Fig. 6. Typical FIA response of Naon/NRDS-enzyme electrode
array in the brain dialysate collected from rat striatum (a), and
addition of (A) 2.0 mM glucose, (B) 2.80 mM lactate, (C) 0.70 mM LL-
glutamate and (D) 0.10 mM hypoxanthine mixture standard solutions
(b). Other conditions as in Fig. 4.
Table 2
Content of the four analytes in rat striatum dialysate sample and
recoveriesa
Analytes Detected/
lmol l1Added/
mmol l1Found/
mmol l1Recovery/
%
Glucose 412 2.00 2.48 102.8
Lactate 685 2.80 3.41 97.8
LL-glutamate 1.06 0.70 0.68 97.1
Hypoxanthine 5.91 0.10 0.11 103.8
a The values shown are calculated from the calibration curves and
are the mean of n = 3 in each case.Anal. Chim. Acta 379 (1999) 307.
[12] M.A. Malone, H. Zuo, S.M. Lunte, M.R. Smyth, J. Chromatogr.
A 700 (1995) 73.
[13] F. Xu, L. Wang, M.N. Gao, L.T. Jin, J.Y. Jin, Talanta 57 (2002)
365.
[14] A.A. Karyakin, Y.N. Ivanova, E.E. Karyakina, Electrochem.
Commun. 5 (2003) 677.
[15] B. Grundig, G. Wittstock, U. Rudel, B. Strehlitz, J. Electroanal.
Chem. 395 (1995) 143.
[16] S.M. Chen, K.C. Lin, J. Electroanal. Chem. 511 (2001) 101.
[17] P. de-los-SantosAlvarez, P. Rodrguez-Granda, M.J. Lobo-Cast-
anon, A.J. Miranda-Ordieres, P. Tunon-Blanco, Electrochem.
Commun. 5 (2003) 267.
[18] M. Qhobosheane, S. Santra, P. Zhang, W.H. Tan, Analyst 126
(2001) 1274.
[19] B. Strehlitz, B. Grundig, W. Schumacher, P.M.H. Kroneck, K.-[6] E. Llaudet, N.P. Botting, J.A. Crayston, N. Dale, Biosens.
Bioelectron. 18 (2003) 43.
[7] L.I. Netchiporouk, N.F. Shram, N.J. Renault, C. Martelet, R.
Cespuglio, Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 4358.
[8] M. Ellmerer, L. Schaupp, Z. Trajanoski, G. Jobst, I. Moser, G.
Urban, F. Skrabal, P. Wash, Biosens. Bioelectron. 13 (1998) 1007.
[9] P.S. Petrou, I. Moser, G. Jobst, Biosens. Bioelectron. 18 (2003)
613.
[10] J. Woitzik, N. Abromeit, F. Schaefer, Anal. Biochem. 289 (2001)is very sensitive and useful for the simultaneous moni-
toring of glucose, lactate, LL-glutamate and hypoxan-
thine levels in in vitro dialysate samples. Uniform
NR-doped silica nanoparticles retained a high elec-
tron-transfer eciency and showed electrocatalytic
activity toward the four analytes. There was negligibleinterference from oxidizable species (such as ascorbate,
and urate) in the extracellular space of rat brain, and
the system was useful to the study of brain metabolism
and neuron communication. The system has the poten-
tial to be applied to monitor the four analytes in other
parts of living cells, such as hepatic tissue and the blood
stream.
Acknowledgments
Financial support is acknowledged from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20175006,
20305007) and the specialized Research Fund for Nano-
technology from Shanghai (No. 0214nm078 and No.
0359nm002).
References
[1] M.G. Boutelle, L.K. Fellows, C. Cook, Anal. Chem. 64 (1992)
1790.
[2] N.F. Shram, L.I. Netchiporouk, C. Martelet, N. Jarezic-Renault,
C. Bonnet, R. Cespuglio, Anal. Chem. 70 (1998) 2618.
[3] A. Hashimoto, J. Kanda, T. Oka, Brain Res. Bull. 53 (2000) 347.
[4] L.Q. Mao, F. Xu, Q. Xu, L.T. Jin, Anal. Biochem. 292 (2001) 94.D. Vorlop, H. Kotte, Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 807.
[20] M. Abo, Y. Ogasawara, Y. Tanaka, A. Okubo, S. Yamazaki,
Biosens. Bioelectron. 18 (2003) 735.
[21] M. Zhu, S.B. Han, Z.B. Yuan, J. Electroanal. Chem. 480 (2000)
255.
[22] D.J. Harrison, R.F.B. Turner, H.P. Balters, Anal.Chem. 60
(1988) 2002.
[23] J.H. Yu, S.Q. Liu, H.X. Ju, Biosens. Bioelectron. 19 (2003) 401.
[24] F.J. Arriagada, K. Osseo-Asare, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 211 (1999)
210.
[25] W. Stober, A. Fink, E. Bohn, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 26 (1968) 62.
[26] X.M. Bao, Y. Su, The Stereotaxic Atlas of the Rat Brain, PeoplesHealthy Press, Beijing, China, 1991.
[27] Y.X. Sun, B.X. Ye, W.M. Zhang, X.Y. Zhou, Anal. Chim. Acta
363 (1998) 75.
[28] X.L. Luo, J.J. Xu, W. Zhao, H.Y. Chen, Sensor Actuat. B 97
(2004) 249.
[29] Z.J. Chen, X.M. Ou, F.Q. Tang, L. Jiang, Colloids Surf., B:
Biointerf. 7 (1996) 173.
[30] T. Yao, T. Yano, H. Nishino, Anal. Chim. Acta 510 (2004) 53.
[31] T. Yao, T. Yano, Talanta 63 (2004) 771.
[32] J.F. Stover, K. Lowitzsch, O.S. Kempski, Neurosci. Lett. 238
(1997) 25.
[33] M.W. Lada, T.W. Vickroy, R.T. Kennedy, Anal. Chem. 69 (1997)
4560.
F.-F. Zhang et al. / Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 575 (2005) 17 7
Simultaneous monitoring of glucose, lactate, l-glutamate and hypoxanthine levels in rat striatum by a flow-injection enzyme electrode array system with in vivo microdialysis samplingIntroductionExperimentalReagentsApparatusSynthesis NRDS nanoparticlesConstruction of a Nafion reg /NRDS-enzyme electrode arrayFIA with a Nafion reg /NRDS-enzyme electrode array system for simultaneous detection of biological samples
Results and discussionCharacterization and electrochemical behavior of nanoparticlesOptimization of flow-injection analysisAmperometric response on Nafion reg /NRDS-enzyme electrode array and Nafion reg /enzyme electrode arrayLinearity, detection limits of Nafion reg /NRDS-enzyme electrode array by FIA systemReproducibility and stability of Nafion reg /NRDS-enzyme electrode arrayStudy on the interferenceDetermination of glucose, lactate, l-glutamate and hypoxanthine level in living samples
ConclusionsAcknowledgmentsReferences