32
Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. [email protected] September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com

Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. [email protected] September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System

Susan Moser, CPA

Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.

[email protected]

September 23, 2010

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com

Page 2: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com2

2

Objectives

Requirement for adequate systems

General data requested

Preparing for audit

Real world stories

Proposed rule

Closing remarks

Page 3: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com3

3

The Myth

“Approved” Accounting Systems

Page 4: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com4

4

The Truth

“Adequate” Accounting Systems

o Based on contract type and requirements

o FAR 16.301-3 – adequate to determine costs applicable to cost reimbursement contracts (no FAR requirement for T&M or FFP contracts)

o FAR 9.103 – KO must determine responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1

May request a pre-award survey (FAR 9.106)

No longer adequate in part – either adequate or inadequate

Page 5: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com5

5

When are Audits Conducted?

Prior to award of cost or T&M type contract

After award of contract to verify system functioning properly

If accounting software changes

Mergers and Acquisitions

Page 6: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com6

6

Why We Should Care

Contracting Officers use audit report to help determine contractor responsibility

Negative report may result in not winning cost type or T&M work

Both Government and Prime contractors are asking contractors to certify whether or not system(s) are adequate

Page 7: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com7

7

Accounting System Defined

Software

People

Processes

Policies

Page 8: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com8

8

Basic Requirements

Segregation of Duties

Written policies and procedures

Method to consistently allocate costs

Identify costs by project

Software is a tool to accomplish this

Page 9: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com9

9

Size Matters

Compliant system varies by company size

1 man shop requires little controls or written policies

1000 person company needs segregation of duties, employee training, written policies

Page 10: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com10

10

Requested Data

Chart of Accounts

Trial Balance – in accrual; ties to all subsidiary reports

o May also request G/L

Financial Statements

Project Report(s)

Organization Chart

List of government contracts

Page 11: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com11

11

Requested Data, contd.

Policies and Procedures

o Timekeeping

o Billing

o Indirect Rates

o Budgeting

o Segregating costs (emphasis on unallowable)

Survey of Contractor’s Organization

Page 12: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com12

12

Preparing for Audit

Always be audit ready

o Expected to provide info quickly (see MRD from 12/19/08)

Request audit number & name

Review audit program to understand scope

o Pre-award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System – Activity Code 17740

o Standard Form 1408

Page 13: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com13

13

Preparing for Audit, contd.

Written description of basic account structure

o System used (Deltek, QuickBooks)

o Identify pools and bases for indirect rates and how to identify within the chart of accounts

o Define company’s allocation methods and indirect cost pools

o Overview only – may only be a few pages

Page 14: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com14

14

Preparing for Audit, contd.

Reconcile all reports and correct variances or have a thorough explanation available prior to audit

Select a variety of timesheets

o self-audit that timekeeping procedure was followed and time properly recorded in accounting system

Identify contracts with special accounting/billing requirements and verify contract terms followed (75% notice)

Page 15: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com15

15

Surprises

Post Award Accounting System Audits

Pre-award Survey – conducted again?

o But everything was fine in the last audit

Proposed change to DFARS

o Potential for withholding if systems are inadequate

Page 16: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com16

16

Post Award Accounting System Audit

Scope: adequate system to segregate and bill costs IAW contract requirements

Not designed for overall accounting system review

Not testing internal controls

May be requested by Contracting Officer or follow-up to pre-award

Page 17: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com17

17

Real World Examples

Was adequate, now it’s inadequate

Special requests

Written policies

Timekeeping

Fully utilizing accounting system

New business

Page 18: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com18

18

Adequate to Inadequate

Accounting System: Deltek FMS

Revenue > $20 million

Original pre-award audit deemed system adequate

Several years later, updating with a post award audit

o System deemed inadequate

Significant issues:

o Lack of billing policies and procedures

o Lack of training on proper billing procedures

o Billings not based on current accounting information

o Not reconciling booked to billed costs

o Not excluding unallowable costs (travel)

Page 19: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com19

19

Adequate to Inadequate, contd.

Contractor Response:

o Develop policies and procedures to exceed DCAA’s recommendations

o Hire additional accounting staff

o Develop training plan

o Revise method to calculate invoices

o Revise expense reimbursement policy

o Hired consultant to assist with project reconciliations and P&P development

Page 20: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com20

20

Adequate to Inadequate, contd.

Results

o Regular visits with DCAA to track progress

o Meetings with customers to assure of contractor’s capabilities/responsibility

o High cost in labor and time to correct

o Follow-up audit conducted

o Received notice of adequate system 1 year after initial audit began

Page 21: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com21

21

Prime & KO Request

Accounting System: Peachtree

Revenue > $10 million

Prime contractor questioned propriety of subcontractor cost allocations

IG investigated subcontractor and found no improprieties

Subcontractor awarded large prime contract - cost reimbursable

o KO read article on IG investigation and asked DCAA to perform accounting system survey

o System found inadequate

o Different KO received report and stated no renewal of cost contract

Page 22: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com22

22

Prime & KO Request, contd.

Negotiated with KO to receive FFP contract

Significant issues

o Inconsistent treatment of fringe benefits as direct or indirect cost

Mistake in presentation on the ICS

o Non-segregation of costs by contract type within a contract

Accounting system is capable of this

Setup corrected

o Indirect costs not billed using provisional billing rates

Misunderstanding on ability to revise provisional rates

o Indirect rates not adjusted to actual year end rates

Creating policy to make interim billing adjustments

Page 23: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com23

23

Prime & KO Request, contd.

Results

o Incurred cost submissions amended and accepted by DCAA

o Negotiations with customers to award FFP contracts or extend current contracts

o Large expense in time and money to resolve

o DCAA returned to review accounting system

KO requested specific invoices be reviewed

Debate on accuracy of invoices

Adequacy of accounting system withheld pending result of billing system

Not resolved after 15 months

Page 24: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com24

24

Policies & Procedures

Accounting System: Solomon

Pre-award survey conducted

Contractor activities were adequate

Lacked written policies & procedures – inadequate system

Contractor put everything in writing within weeks

o DCAA not to return for 6 months to have sufficient data to test

Contractor lost two contracts as a result of report

Page 25: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com25

25

Policies and Procedures, contd.

DCAA returned and found directly associated unallowable costs that were not segregated

Maintained system was inadequate

As of March 2010, system still inadequate (9 months after initial report)

Page 26: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com26

26

Timekeeping

Accounting System: Deltek Costpoint

System found inadequate for not recording time in and out

No requirement to record this information

Until contractor can overturn this decision, remains on record and can affect future awards

Page 27: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com27

27

Accounting System Features Accounting System: Deltek Costpoint Significant Issues

o Not segregating unallowable G&A travel

o Not maintaining adequate contract briefs Contractor Response

o Hired a consultant to review segregation of unallowable travel after adjusting system

o Prepared contract briefs in Word format following Schedule S

o Hired a consultant to review briefs against contracts

o Consultant wrote report on procedures and results

Letter provided to KO

o DCAA returned and deemed system adequate (took 6-8 months)

Page 28: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com28

28

New Business

Accounting System: QuickBooks

Pre-award survey prior to award of SBIR contract

Revenue size < $1 million

Redesigned chart of accounts prior to audit

Improved policies to be more clear on timekeeping and payroll

Improved company handbook

Developed a policy on segregating unallowable costs

Provided DCAA with organized package of info requested

o Explained why some items were not applicable

Adequate system and promise that there will be a follow-up audit to ensure system working

Page 29: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com29

29

DFARS Case 2009-D038

Acceptable business system rule

Mandatory - Withhold payments – up to 50%

o Interim payments

Cost reimbursement

Incentive type

T&M

Labor Hour

o Progress payments

o Performance-based payments

o No exception for commercial contracts

Page 30: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com30

30

DFARS Case 2009-D038, contd.

Systems involved

o Accounting

o Estimating

o Material Management & Accounting

o Purchasing

o Earned Value Management

o Property Management

Public Comments closed; committee report due July 28

Page 31: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com31

31

Final Remarks

Don’t assume system is adequate

Continuous improvement

Consider expert advice

o Before audit

o During audit

o Upon receipt of draft report

Mock audit(s)

Page 32: Mysteries of a Compliant Accounting System Susan Moser, CPA Partner, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. smoser@cbh.com September 23, 2010 The Firm of Choice

The Firm of Choice. www.cbh.com32

32

QUESTIONS?