34
My ‘designer’ baby

My ‘designer’ baby

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

My ‘designer’ baby. Designer Babies?????. Julia Roberts: Twins, boy/girl 2004 Angelina Jolie: Twins, boy/girl 2008 Jenifer Lopez: Twins, boy/girl 2008 Maria Carey: Twins, boy/girl 2011. Should we test our embryos or leave nature to take its own course?. Gene Therapy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: My ‘designer’ baby

My ‘designer’ baby

Page 2: My ‘designer’ baby

Designer Babies?????

• Julia Roberts: Twins, boy/girl 2004

• Angelina Jolie: Twins, boy/girl 2008

• Jenifer Lopez: Twins, boy/girl 2008

• Maria Carey: Twins, boy/girl 2011

Page 3: My ‘designer’ baby

Should we test our embryos or leave nature to take its own course?

Page 4: My ‘designer’ baby

‘Humans should be born perfect or not at all’What do you think? Explain your opinion (3 AE)

Give 3 different reasons to support your opinion OR give arguments for and against…

I agree/disagree/not sure because…

Gene TherapyWRITE YOUR VIEWS

ON THE STATEMENT BELOW AND GIVE REASONS

WHY

Page 5: My ‘designer’ baby

What is Genetic engineering?

Basically it is about changing or destroying parts of a humans genetic make up in the embryonic stages of life.

Pre Implantation Genetic Diagnosis or Selection / Screening is one of the main reasons for embryos to be tampered with. This is when embryos are tested for genetically inherited diseases, so they don’t get passed on.

To investigate the meaning of human genetic engineering

To understand the effectiveness and morality of human genetic engineering

Page 6: My ‘designer’ baby

So what would this mean for people with disabilities and inherited diseases?

Are they a ‘lesser human

being’?

Not perfect?

Not normal?

Page 7: My ‘designer’ baby

Stephen Hawking• Hawking has a form of Motor

Neuron Disease, a condition that has progressed over the years and has left him almost completely paralyzed.

• He gradually lost the use of his arms, legs, and voice, and is now almost completely paralyzed.

• He describes himself as "lucky" despite his disease

Page 8: My ‘designer’ baby

Michael J Fox

• Fox was a successful actor, winning several Golden Globes and Emmys for his work

• Fox was diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease in 1991 (a degenerative disease of the brain that often impairs motor skills, speech, and other functions.)

• He disclosed his condition to the public in 1998, and as the symptoms of his disease worsened he semi-retired from acting in 2000.

Page 9: My ‘designer’ baby

Question

• Would these people change the way they are in order to live a ‘normal’ lifestyle?

Stephen Hawking is a genius who has still managed to do what he loves and become a phenomenon in his field.

Michael J Fox has done extensive work to promote awareness of this disease and raise money for research

Page 10: My ‘designer’ baby

Who has the right to decide?

• Who should be allowed to decide which traits and characteristics are ‘desirable’ and which aren’t?

• The parents• Doctors• The Government

Page 11: My ‘designer’ baby

Britain debates “designer

babies” for IVF couplesPosted Mar 24, 2005

Fri 29 Apr 2005

Creation of designer

babies for treatment

is lawful, rule Lords

Monday, 6 September, 2004,

Go ahead for 'designer baby'

Designer babies - the ethical debate

Wednesday, 21 July, 2004, 17:33 GMT 18:33 UK

'Designer baby' rules are relaxed

GENETICALLY ENGINEERED HUMANS

Will we create GM humans?

Thursday, 24 March, 2005, 09:06 GMT Parents 'could pick babies' sex'

Page 12: My ‘designer’ baby
Page 13: My ‘designer’ baby

Case Study on Gene Selection

In pairs discuss the case study and decide

whether they should be allowed to use genetic engineering for their

child

Mr and Mrs Jones have both been deaf since birth. They want to have a child, but would prefer the child to be deaf. They asked their health authority to provide treatment that would allow an embryo containing a defective gene causing deafness to be implanted into Mrs Jones’

womb.Request was turned down as it is

illegal according to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act

(2008)

Should they be allowed to create a deaf child using gene selection?

Page 14: My ‘designer’ baby
Page 15: My ‘designer’ baby

Arguments on Genetic Engineering

Removes unwanted genetic diseases such as Huntington's and ALS

Designer babies – choose hair and eye colour, intelligence, physical

appearance, sexuality?Destruction of unwanted

embryos – create more than needed must be destroyed 14 days after conception BY LAW

Catholic View on Destruction of unwanted embryos – life begins at conception so IT IS MURDER!

Goes against commandment ‘Do not kill’

Scientists playing ‘Role of God’

Better quality of life

Basic Human Right to choose

Are living disabled people seen as lesser humans?

Page 16: My ‘designer’ baby

Engineering 124; Spring 2003

16

PGD: Genetic testing performed prior to embryo

transfer “The debate [around PGD] has been building since the late 1980s, when doctors at London's Hammersmith Hospital learned how to tease a cell from a 3-day-old embryo and study its chromosomes for gender.”(Zitner 2002) • Adds $2000 to IVF

• Reduces rate of miscarriages from 23% to 10%• Does not increase chance of pregnancy

Page 17: My ‘designer’ baby

Engineering 124; Spring 2003 17

Commonly, more than 100 diseases can be detected through testing, including…

• Hemophilia A• Muscular dystrophy• Tay-Sachs disease• Cystic fibrosis• Down Syndrome Removal of one cell for testing

Page 18: My ‘designer’ baby

Engineering 124; Spring 2003 18

Viable and Desirable?“This information is helping parents choose which embryos they want--and which to reject as unhealthy, or merely undesirable.” (Zitner 2002)

Page 19: My ‘designer’ baby

Engineering 124; Spring 2003 19

Undesirable Embryos

Disease Free Embryos

• Frozen in storage • Donated to

infertile couples• Donated to stem

cell research/usage

Disease Carrying Embryos

• Donated to research

• Discarded

Page 21: My ‘designer’ baby

Engineering 124; Spring 2003

21

… weighing the goal of pregnancy and live birth against the medical and moral risks of multiple gestation.

…using PGD inherently makes assumptions about the quality of life, challenging basic tenets of society such as equality.

…requires society to make a decision on when life begins.

Issues

Page 22: My ‘designer’ baby

22

• Address the suffering of the mother due to her inability to have a child “naturally”

• “When having children, people…often roll the genetic dice and hope for the best. With embryo sorting, "they can start their pregnancy on Day One with a commitment to continuing it."

(Zitner 2002)

• PGD can save parents massive heartbreak and financial strain

Ethics• Address the view of the potential

child– Will the child have adequate support

and a stable home?– If there are multiple fetuses, will the

children receive adequate care/attention?

• “[PGD has] the goal of stopping deadly genetic diseases such as Tay-Sachs and Huntington’s. This research has growing support because it can save children from enormous suffering and early death.”

(Wagner 2003)

Some ethicists would be in favor of IVF and PGD as long as the decision is loving and promotes positive relationships.

Page 23: My ‘designer’ baby

Rights Based Ethics

Based on John Locke’s principles, all people have the right (in America) to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

• What becomes of the idea that everyone is created equal if you start designing children?

• Loss of autonomy because of a necessity to be competitive in society

• Inherently discriminatory; makes assumptions about quality of life

"Most people with disabilities rate their quality of life as much higher than other people think. People make the decision [to reject embryos] based on a prejudice that having a disability means having a low quality of life.“

Embryos are mass-produced, screened, discarded and used in experiments: are they products or people with rights?

Page 24: My ‘designer’ baby

Did you see…?• Why was the

younger sister, Anna born?

• What technology was used in her conception?

• The term used to describe someone in Anna’s situation is a ‘Saviour Sibling’

Page 25: My ‘designer’ baby

Could it really happen?

• If a child is suffering from certain inherited diseases, the solution could be a transplant of ‘stem cells’ from a sibling (brother or sister)

• These can be collected from the sibling’s umbilical cord, bone marrow, or other tissue.

• This is legal in the UK

Page 26: My ‘designer’ baby

However• It is NOT LEGAL to create a saviour

sibling to donate organs, or other tissues.

• So ‘Anna’ could NOT be asked to donate a kidney in the UK.

• Why do you think the law in the UK has made this decision?

Page 27: My ‘designer’ baby
Page 28: My ‘designer’ baby

I had a 'saviour sibling' to cure my desperately ill son - but now I've found out my newborn daughter can't save his life

Donna Zammit's first, tearful words to her husband Thomas after their baby daughter was born six weeks ago were: "I did this for Jamie.“

Strange words, but then baby Donatella was conceived with the primary intention of her becoming a "saviour sibling" to her nine-year-old brother Jamie, who suffers from the rare genetic blood disorder Fanconi anaemia.

Their unbridled optimism that Donatella might provide their son with a bone marrow transplant and in doing so save his life has been cruelly short-lived.

Page 29: My ‘designer’ baby
Page 30: My ‘designer’ baby

Saviour SiblingsThe HFEA has laid down mandatory guidelines for saviour siblings:

The saviour can only help a sibling with a life-threatening condition which is hereditary in nature.The saviour sibling must not be modified genetically as an embryo or its organs used.The only part of the saviour that can be used is blood from its umbilical cord.The use of a saviour will not be allowed unless (a) all other methods of solving the sibling’s disease have been tried and (b) there is no danger to the health of the saviour foetus.The parents must agree to (a) counselling before the fertility treatment takes place and (b) take part in follow-up research, to examine the long-term effect on both the saviour and his or her sibling.

Page 31: My ‘designer’ baby

• There has been, since 2005, an increasing number of saviour babies conceived, raising profound ethical issues about the universal right to a child.

• Is it morally right to engineer a child for a purpose?

• Some pro-choice clinicians argue that as long as the child is loved it ceases to be important why the baby was born. They also argue that restrictions on saviour siblings are absurd: how can any committee judge what illness deserves treatment and what does not?

• Pro-choice scholars, such as Stephen Wilkinson, also argue that no damage is done to the saviour foetus. It is only the blood from the umbilical cord that is required, a thing that would in normal circumstances be destroyed.

Page 32: My ‘designer’ baby

How might medical scientists define an

embryo?

• A fertilised egg from 14 days to 8 weeks.

• The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act defines an embryo as a live human embryo where fertilisation is complete.

or• An egg in the process of fertilisation.

Page 33: My ‘designer’ baby

Describe UK law relating to the use of human embryos in

research.

• Human cloning is not allowed.• Therapeutic cloning is allowed.• Licences must be provided by the

HFEA.• Research allowed up to 14 days of

development.• Frozen embryos can only be stored

for up to 5 years.

Page 34: My ‘designer’ baby

What arguments might scientists use to support using human embryos in

research?• A human embryo gives a more accurate

picture of how the illness/treatment may affect a person.

• The embryo is not a human being but only a collection of cells.

• It has no self-awareness, thoughts, internal organs etc. Therefore, material can be extracted to benefit others.

• The research could help to eliminate diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and even cancer.