9
My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL. Well... I have had my promised meeting with the Premier Mike Baird to try and talk him out of his forced merger plans for Hunters Hill. Want to know how it went? I’m afraid it didn’t start well... We (the Mayor and I) asked whether there was any advice or information we could give him that might encourage him to re- consider the forced merger of Hunters Hill. (We figured he might be interested in our view on this) - Have a guess what he replied…. In a word – “No”. There was nothing we could say that would change his mind. He went on to say (paraphrasing) Hunters Hill is an insignificant backwater, too small to be sustainable and it is a no-brainer that it should be merged. Auckland and Brisbane have one council and Sydney needs to get with the program and go this way as well. Okay so yes, I did want to slap him about the face with a fish. I mean some-one has to snap him out of this one-way train of thought. I checked in the water jug. Sadly, no fish. I poured a drink instead. 15 minutes. That’s all we had. 15 minutes to get through to the man… Looking at him, I wondered who I was really there for? Us (Hunters Hill) or him? Hunters Hill is not the insignificant backwater he believes. Quite the reverse (more on this in a minute…) I have great faith in Hunters Hill. We have seen merger threats like this through in the past and we will again, but Mike? Well, I think he’s is in a whole world of pain over this. I’m not sure that he really knows it, or understands why this is. It’s been a colossal mistake of course - a critical error in judgement. Mike’s “bigger councils are better” train of thought may be very well-intentioned, but it is leading him straight off a cliff, taking us all with him. Mike Baird is in a world of pain over forced mergers In the last 12 months Mike has suffered a catastrophic collapse in support - an unheralded fall from grace, and the origin of it all? The epicentre? - Forced mergers.

My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

My15MINUTESwithMIKEBAIRDoverMERGERSandHUNTERSHILL.

Well...IhavehadmypromisedmeetingwiththePremierMikeBairdtotryandtalkhimoutofhisforcedmergerplansforHuntersHill.Wanttoknowhowitwent?I’mafraiditdidn’tstartwell...We(theMayorandI)askedwhethertherewasanyadviceorinformationwecouldgivehimthatmightencouragehimtore-considertheforcedmergerofHuntersHill.(Wefiguredhemight

beinterestedinourviewonthis)-Haveaguesswhathereplied….Inaword–“No”.Therewasnothingwecouldsaythatwouldchangehismind.Hewentontosay(paraphrasing)HuntersHillisaninsignificantbackwater,toosmalltobesustainableanditisano-brainerthatitshouldbemerged.AucklandandBrisbanehaveonecouncilandSydneyneedstogetwiththeprogramandgothiswayaswell.Okaysoyes,Ididwanttoslaphimaboutthefacewithafish.Imeansome-onehastosnaphimoutofthisone-waytrainofthought.Icheckedinthewaterjug.Sadly,nofish.Ipouredadrinkinstead.15minutes.That’sallwehad.15minutestogetthroughtotheman…Lookingathim,IwonderedwhoIwasreallytherefor?Us(HuntersHill)orhim?HuntersHillisnottheinsignificantbackwaterhebelieves.Quitethereverse(moreonthisinaminute…)IhavegreatfaithinHuntersHill.Wehaveseenmergerthreatslikethisthroughinthepastandwewillagain,butMike?Well,Ithinkhe’sisinawholeworldofpainoverthis.I’mnotsurethathereallyknowsit,orunderstandswhythisis.

It’sbeenacolossalmistakeofcourse-acriticalerrorinjudgement.Mike’s“biggercouncilsarebetter”trainofthoughtmaybeverywell-intentioned,butitisleadinghimstraightoffacliff,takingusallwithhim.

MikeBairdisinaworldofpainoverforcedmergersInthelast12monthsMikehassufferedacatastrophiccollapseinsupport-anunheraldedfallfromgrace,andtheoriginofitall?Theepicentre?-Forcedmergers.

Page 2: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

Inthe5monthsbetweenannouncingtheforcedmergersinDec2015,andenactingtheminMay2016,Mike’spreviouslyuntouchablepopularitycrashedastaggering10%,heraldingtheonsetofamassiveandasyetnon-stopdownhillspiral.Thefall-outfromthisagendahascostseveralFederalLiberalseats,swungNSWcouncilsandtheCityofSydneyagainsthim,andmostrecentlytheNationalslosttheirsafeststateseatofOrange,inthebiggestswinginby-electionhistory,takingtheirleaderandDeputyPremierwithit.

Sowherehavethingsgonesowrong?Wellhere’sthecruxofit-Ibelieve.Mikeisthinkingofcouncilsas“businesses”,whichcanbemergedto“createefficienciesandsavecosts.”Itsoundslikeagoodidearight?-Wellitsoundsright-butit’swrong.Councilsarenot“businesses”,theyare“governments”-electedbyandanswerabletolocalresidents.Theydon’tjustdoroads,ratesandrubbish(business),theygovern-theyarethe“keepersofplace”,guardiansofthelookandfeel,thedevelopmentand“character”ofaplace.BarnabyJoycewasrightwhenhesaidformanycommunitiesthelocalgovernment(council)istheirlocal“country”.Whenyouforciblymergebusinesses–yes,it’sabouteconomics.Butwhenyoutrytoforciblymergegovernments(countries)–well,that’snoteconomics–that’swar.Andwithwar-suddenlyallthosepotentialeconomicsavingsgooutthedoor.WhenyouunderstandthatSydney’scouncilsarereallyapatchworkoflocal“countries”(governments)-a“microEurope”ifyoulike,youcanseethatMike’splantoforciblymergethemagainsttheirwillisamicroreplayofHitler’sattempttoforciblymergethecountriesofEuropeagainsttheirwill.It’saggressiveidealismbasedonadeeplyflawedpremise.

HuntersHillissmallyes,butsoisSwitzerland.ShouldSwitzerlandbeforcedtomergewithGermanyjustbecauseitissmall?IsoverthrowingtheSwissgovernmentandsendinginanadministratortooverseeaforcedmergerwithGermanyawiseapproachtoachievelong-termsustainabilityandeconomicreform?

HuntersHill,Sydney'ssmallestmunicipalitysitsonit'sownpeninsularbetweentheLaneCoveandParramattaRiversMikebelievesitmakeseconomicsense(fromabusinessperspective)tomergeSydney’scouncilssothattheyareallofsimilarsizewithaminimum150,000people,(thisistotakeheadofficecostsoutetc.)Butdoesthismakesensefromagovernmentperspective?How

Page 3: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

doesitsoundasapremiseifwesuddenlydeclarethatEuropeancountriesmustallbethesamesizewithaminimum150millionpeopleeach-andsetaboutsackingtheirgovernmentstoforciblymergethemtoachievethis?ThisiswhereMikehasgoneseriouslywrong-bytreatinggovernmentsasiftheyarebusinesseshehasseriouslyunderestimatedthevaluesomecommunitiesplaceonmaintainingtheautonomyoftheirowngovernment-their“country”,andhowtheywillreacttosome-onewhoseekstooverthrowitandreplaceitwithaforeigngovernment-howhardtheywillfightforit,andtheeconomic,socialandpoliticalcostofthis.HuntersHillisonesuchcommunity.

HuntersHill,althoughsmallisfarfrombeingtheeconomicbasketcaseofMike’simaginings.Rather,likeSwitzerland,itishighlystrategicandsuccessfulatwhatitdoesandhasstrongcommunitysupport.Wehavemultimillionsinthebankandnodebt.Asproofthatsizehasnothingtodowiththefinancialsustainablityofgovernment-HuntersHill,Sydney’ssmallestcouncil,meetsalltheIPARTfinancialsustainabilitycriteria,whereas

Blacktowncouncil(Sydney’slargest),doesnot.(Andlet’snotevenmentiontheFederalGovernment).Wehaveachievedthistodate,notthroughforcedamalgamation,butthroughstrategicregionalpartnerships,innovationandharnessingourresourcebase–inparticularthestrengthsofourlocalcommunity.Mike'sproposedforcedmergerisnotanattractiveoptionforthefutureanywaywelookatit.Anobjectiveandfactualbusinesscaseanalysispredictsatbesta12milliondollarsaving,atworsta33milliondollarloss.Thisisaseriouslyhighrisk,lowcost-benefitbusiness-casefora15milliondollarinvestmentoftaxpayerfunds.Andthat’swithoutfactoringinthebiggestcost-thelossofourindependentgovernment.

LikeSwitzerland,HuntersHillhasitsownunique“brand”and“character”-thishasdevelopedover160yearsoflocalresidentselectingrepresentativesthatprioritisethepreservationofourenvironmentalandbuiltheritage,suchthatwenowhavemoreheritageitemsperkm2thananyothermunicipalityinAustralia.75%ofourlandsareclassifiedconservationareasandweareconsideredaheritage“jewelinthecrown”forSydney,rivallingtheRocks.

ThePriory-preservedheritageofHuntersHill

Page 4: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

OurmuchlargerneighbouringcouncilRydehasadifferent“government”,adifferentcultureandcharacteraltogether–itdoesnotprioritiseheritageandconservationthewayHuntersHilldoes-andinfactbelievesthisgetsinthewayofgrowth.Yet,ifforcedtomerge,HuntersHillwillhaveonlyonerepresentativeonthenew“greaterRyde”council,whowillbeout-votedonalldecisionsforHuntersHill–includingthoseregarding

planning,character,heritageandconservation,developmentsandre-zonings.Wewillrisklosingeverythingwehavefoughttoenhanceandprotectoverthepast160years.So-likeSwitzerland,HuntersHillhasnothingtogainandeverythingtolosefromaforcedmerger.

Mikerespondstothisbysayingthathebelievesthatlocalautonomyoverdevelopmentandcharactercanbeprotectedinforciblymergedcouncils-butatthesametimehecan’treallysayhow.Theharshtruthisthatthereisnowaytoprotectit.Thenewgovernment(council,withonlyonelocalrepresentative)assumespoweroveralldevelopmentcontrols-it’seffectivelyaforeigntake-over.

PreservedheritageforeshoresofHuntersHillMikecomesbacktoAuckland–ithas“protectedlocaldiversityinalargemergedcouncil”hesays.ButAucklandhasinstituted21locallyelected“boards”(essentiallya4thlevelofGovernment).ThesearenotproposedinMike’smergers–besides,whoinSydneywantsthat?Sydneyisuniqueduetoitshistory,itslocation,itsharbor,beaches,riversandstunningbutcomplexgeographiclandforms.Ithasdevelopedfabulousdiversityinitslocalgovernmentareas.It’samini“Europe”,itneedsitsownsolution–notAuckland’sorBrisbane’s-andnotforcedamalgamations.ThereisamuchbetterwayforwardforSydney,justliketherewasforEurope.EverythingMikewantstoachievefromaneconomicperspectivecanbebetterachievedwithoutforcedmergers,throughstrengtheningourexistingregionalstrategicandeconomicpartnershipsinstead–i.e.liketheEU.ForcouncilsthisisachievedthroughstrengtheningandbetterenablingourRegionalOrganisationsofCouncils(ROCs)orforming“JointOrganisations”(JOs)(theseallowedsharedservicesandeconomiesofscaleetc-deliveringeconomicunion–withoutpoliticalunion).Thisisthewayforwardwehaveproposed.We,(withourneighbouringcouncils)haveputforwardaJointOrganisationproposalthathasoverwhelmingsupportfromour3communities,academicsandpoliticiansalike–everyone,sadlyexceptMike.Mikeisonhisone-track“youwillamalgamate”approach.

Page 5: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

IexpresstheopiniontoMikethattheactionofforcingmergersoncommunitiesagainsttheirwill,sackinggovernments,sendinginadministratorsandthebrutalmethodbywhichthishasbeendone–hasdefinedhim-brandedhimas"dictatorial"“invasive”"arrogant",“bulldozing,"tramplingcommunityconcerns".Itisaperceptionofhimthatcrystallisedinminds,attheonemoment-rightacrossNSW.

Forcedmergersarethecore,therot,thebirthplaceofMikes"DictatorialBrand"

IsuggesttohimthatthisisatthecoreofhisplummetingpopularityandtheGovernmentslossofsupport.Thecore,therot,thebirthplace,ofitall.FromhereithasspreadoutlikeastaincolouringtheperceptionsofeverythingtheGovernmentdoes-Everysubsequentactionhasonlyservedtocementthis“dictatorial”and“invasive”brand–

• Chain-sawingavenuesof100-year-oldAnzactreesforlightrailintheEasternSuburbs;• BulldozingswathesofheritagehomesinHaberfieldforWestconnex,• Bringinginnewplanninglawsthatgreenlightmassiveinsensitiveoverdevelopment,• Movingthepowerhousemuseumtoselltheprimeinnercitylandtodevelopersandprivatizingeverythinghecangethishandson…thelistgoesonandon.

Longrowof100yearoldAnzaccommemorativetreesbulldozedforlightrail

AcrossNSWpeopleareexperiencingMikeastakingover(orthreateningto)theirgovernmentwhilealsobulldozingandtramplinghiswaythroughtheirhomes,theirenvironments,theirworkplaces,theircommunities,takingawaythethingstheylove,thethingsmostimportanttothem,implementing“hisway”;disempoweringthem.Therehasbeennostopping,nopausing,nolisteningtoreason,nocompromising.

BulldozingheritagehomesinHaberfieldforWestConnexdescribedbyNationalTrustasworstheritagedestructioninSydney'sHistory

Page 6: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

Mikedoesn’tseethisdictatorial“brand”asbeingfairordeserved.Hedoesn’tgetit.Hismindisresolutelyanchoredinthethoughtthatcouncilsarejustbusinesses,mergingthemjustmakesgoodbusinesssense.He’smakingthe“harddecisions”hesays,thatare“inthebesteconomicinterestofNSW”.Itmightnotbepopularbut“it’stherightthingtodoforthelong-term”hesays…Heisseeinghimselfasaneconomicmartyr.

OhDear!I’mbacktoneedingthatfish.IcheckthewaterjugtoseeifGodhasansweredmywish.Ok,soitwasabigask.Iprayhegivesmethewordstohavethesameeffect.

I’msorrytobeharsh–butithastobesaid-it’snotmartyrdom,it’sseriouslymisguidedeconomicmismanagement.ForcingcouncilstomergeagainstthewilloftheircommunitiesisNOTinthebesteconomicinterestofNSW–quitethereverse,it’seconomiccarnage.Abi-partisanreviewoftherecentforcedmergerprogrammeinQueenslandwarnedthatwithoutproperassessmentofcommunitysentimentforcedmergersweredoomedtofailleadingtomassivesocialdisruptionandhugeeconomicwaste.InQueensland,4communitiesvotedtode-amalgamate,assoonastheGovernmentthatmergedthemwaskickedout.“Only4”saysMike(ignoringthebitaboutthegovernmentthatmergedthembeingkickedout,andthefactthatsinceintroducingforcedmergersLibshavegonefromacommandingleadtocloseto50:50on2partypreferred).‘Yes’,Isay-theoneswherecommunitieswerestronglyopposed.InNSWthereare10oftheseatleast,(that’sjustcountingtheonesthathavegonetocourt)–thesheereconomicwasteofthiswholeagendaisalreadyinthe10’sofmillionsdowereallywanttogothroughthesamewastefulscenarioasQueensland,becausethat’swherewe’reheaded.Mikeisn’tconvinced.Hethinkscommunityoppositionisalljusttemporaryangstandpeoplegetoverit.Thecouncilsthathavebeenforciblymergedarenowalldoingwonderfullywell,hesays-thecommunitiesthatwereopposed,likePittwaterarenowallhappyandcontent,andthenewcouncilsarealreadyachievingremarkablesavingshesays.Hisbusinessmergerplansaregoingswimmingly..peoplewillseeheisrightandforgivehim,heseemstobelieve.Thiscomesacrossasalittlerosy-eyedtome.Isuspecttheglowingreportsarejustalittlelopsided,muchlikethe“alliswell”reportsonemighthavereceivedfromtheadministratorsinViennaaftertheGermanoccupation.They’renotlookingatthefullpicture.Savings?-OKsowhatdowereallyknow?Onlyoneforciblymergedcouncil(intheEdenMonaro)hasreleasedaproperobjectivemergerriskassessment,ithasdisclosedthatcostsofthemergerwillexceedthetaxpayerfundsprovidedby1.4milliondollars(cripplingforaregionalcouncil),andthattheriskofpoorstaffmorale,andfailuretodeliveradequateservicesis“extreme”.MeanwhileontheNorthShoretheunmergedcouncils(including

Page 7: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

HuntersHill)areprovingthatsavingscanequallybeachievedwithoutmergers-withoutthecripplingcosts-throughstrategicregionalpartnership.NSROCforexamplehasjustannouncedasharedwasteservicesagreementdelivering2milliondollarsavingsperannum.

HappyandContent?I'mnotsurethatyoucancallthe"occupied"communities"happy"–certainlynotintheinnerwest,wherethereisan“anarchy”campaignrunningagainsttheGovernment.It’snotcontentmentthatisrequiringpolicepresenceatadministrated“council”meetings.

AnarchyinInnerWestcommunityaftertheircouncilsweremergedandanadministratorsentin,justasWestconnexbulldozedaheadthroughtheheartoftheircommunity.NoristhehappinessquitesoeffusiveinPittwater,wheretheadministratorhadtohurriedlypullthe"Monavaleplaceplan"toavoidre-activatingsimmeringcivicunrest.NorinregionalNSWwhereangrycommunitiesarelyinginwaitforelectiontimewithbase-ballbats.

Andof-course,themostoppositionalcommunitiesdon’tfeatureinMikesreportsbecausetheyarestillfightinghimincourt-communitieslikeHuntersHill,Mosman,Woollahra,NorthSydney,LaneCove,Strathfield,Cabonne.CoreLiberal-Nationalheartlandcommunities-allstaunchlyagainstthemergersheisforcingonthem.Isuggestthatthelevelof“happiness”inthesecommunitieswasondisplayforalltoseeattheOrangeBy-election,wherepreviousrusted-on

NationalandLiberalPartysupporterscamefromalloverthestatetocampaignto“StopForcedMergers-PuttheNationalsLast"insupportofCabonne.TheGovernmentlostoneofit’ssafestseats.Ifgovernmentsdon’tlisten,iftheydon’thearandheed,communitiesholdthemtoaccount.

People,goodpeople,areleavingtheLiberalandNationalpartiesindroves-andjoiningcampaignstovotetheirownpartyout.ThepeopleMikemostneedsforsupporthehasdrivenaway-withfeelingsofanger,bitterness,betrayalandbrokentrust.Mikeisnotjustfightingoppositionalcommunitiesoverthis–hehasignitedcivilwarwithinhisownparty-

whichbringsusfullcircletothatcrashingsupportinthepolls.

Page 8: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

Mikeasksme–doIthinkhe’sdictatorial?Our15minutesarenearlyup…Formethebigquestionisnotwhetherheisdictatorial–there’sreallynoquestionofthat–thequestioniswhetheritisintentional?2possibilitiesrunthroughmyhead;Possibility1:Mikereallydoesn’tgetit–thedifferencebetweenmergingbusinessesandmerginggovernments.Thedifferencebetweenbusinessandpoliticalleadership.Hereally(mistakenly)believesheisdoingtherightthing,hedoesn’tunderstandthepolitical,socialandeconomiccarnageheiscausingandno-one,no-onewhoshouldbe,istellinghim.Possibility2:Hereallydoesgetit-butthereareotherulteriormotivesdrivinghimon.Ihopeit’sthefirst.Ifearit’sthelast.Ican’treadhim.IwishIcould.Ofcoursethereareulteriormotivesthatmaywellbeatplay.Forcedmergersdobenefitsome–theybenefitpeopleandbusinessesthatdon’tlikelocalcommunitiestohaveregulatorycontroloverdevelopmentintheirlocalareas–peoplewholikeittobemucheasiertoundertakemassiveinsensitiveoverdevelopmentandwalkawaywiththeprofits-peoplelike“thepropertycouncil”,the“urbangrowth”developmentindustry,massiveinfrastructureprovidersforprojectslikeWestconnex,politicallobbyistsandtreasury.AndofcoursethesearethepeoplewhodohaveMikesear24/7.Thesearethepeopleegginghimon-tellinghimhe’sdoingtherightthing,to“staystrong”–tellinghimtoignorepeoplelikeme,andthecommunitieswehavebeenelectedtorepresent.

Butthesearenotthepeoplewhosevoteswillcount.Theyarenotthepeoplewhoselivesarebeingimpacted,andtheyarenotthepeoplewhowillholdhimtoaccount.Forus–our15minutesofhiseartimeisup.

RallyagainstMikeMay2016-CommunitiesacrossNSWconvergingandaligningtoholdMiketoaccount.DoIthinkheisdictatorial?“Yes”Isay–“yesIdo”–andslaphimaboutthefacewithmyverbalfish,prayingthemessageIamcarryingwillgetthrough.Forhissakeasmuchasours.Heisinonthewrongtrack.InhisheadlongrushtoimplementeconomicprosperityheistramplingalloversocialandenvironmentalprosperityandinitiatingwarwithcommunitiesrightacrossNSW.Thereisnolongtermprosperityinthat.ThereisnothingofGodswillinthat.

Page 9: My 15 MINUTES with MIKE BAIRD over MERGERS and HUNTERS HILL · at best a 12 million dollar saving, at worst a 33 million dollar loss. This is a seriously high risk, low cost-benefit

1Timothy6-10:Theloveofmoneyistherootofallkindsofevil.Somehavewanderedawayfromthefaithandhaveimpaledthemselveswithalotofpainbecausetheymademoneytheirgoal.

PersonallyIhatethis“war”hehasinitiated,Ihatetheneedlesswaste,Ihatethesenselessdamage,themoneydownthedrainonbothsidesofthefence-Ihatetheanger,thepain,thesenseofbetrayal,thedistress.Ihatetoseethetrainofhisgovernmentheadingoverthecliff.Mikeisatacross-roads.Theconstructivewayforwardhereistostopthemergers,andworkwithusallonstrengtheningtheROCsand/orinstitutingJOsinstead.Thedestructivewayistocontinuefullsteamahead.

Today,theAustralianreportssatisfactionwithMikesperformancehasplummetedtohisnewrecordlowof35%.

WidespreadAnti-MergerCommunitySentiment