71
1 Mutationism, Mutationism, Neutralism, Neutralism, Selectionism Selectionism

Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism. Neutral mutations. Deleterious mutations. Overdominant mutations. Advantageous mutations. New mutations may be: 1. Advantageous 2. Overdominant 3. Deleterious 4. Neutral. Probability of fixation: 1. Advantageous - low - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

1

Mutationism, Mutationism, Neutralism, Neutralism, SelectionismSelectionism

Page 2: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

2

Deleterious mutations

Advantageous mutations

Neutral mutations

Overdominant mutations

Page 3: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

3

New mutations may be:New mutations may be:1. Advantageous1. Advantageous2. Overdominant2. Overdominant3. Deleterious3. Deleterious4. Neutral4. Neutral

Page 4: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

4

Probability of fixation:Probability of fixation:1. Advantageous - 1. Advantageous - lowlow2. Overdominant – 2. Overdominant –

close to close to zerozero (genetic (genetic load)load)

3. Deleterious - very 3. Deleterious - very very very lowlow

4. Neutral - very 4. Neutral - very lowlow

Page 5: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

5

Conditional time to Conditional time to fixation:fixation:

1. Advantageous - 1. Advantageous - fastfast

2. Overdominant - 2. Overdominant - extremely slowextremely slow

3. Deleterious - fast3. Deleterious - fast4. Neutral - slow4. Neutral - slow

Page 6: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

6

Deleterious mutations

Advantageous mutations

Neutral mutations

Overdominant mutations

Page 7: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

7

Amount of variability Amount of variability created:created:

1. Advantageous - 1. Advantageous - nonenone

2. Overdominant - a 2. Overdominant - a lotlot

3. Deleterious - none3. Deleterious - none4. Neutral - some4. Neutral - some

Page 8: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

8

THE DRIVING FORCES IN EVOLUTION

Page 9: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

9

3 types of evolutionary explanations:

•Mutationism = evolutionary phenomena are explained by the joint effects of mutational input and random genetic drift.

Page 10: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

10

•Neutralism = evolutionary phenomena are explained by the joints effects of mutation, random genetic drift, and purifying selection.

3 types of evolutionary explanations:

Page 11: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

11

•Selectionism = evolutionary phenomena are explained by the joints effects of advantageous selection and balancing selection.

3 types of evolutionary explanations:

Page 12: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

12

Selectionism

• Gene substitutions occur as a consequence of selection for advantageous mutations. Polymorphism is maintained by balancing selection.

• Gene substitution and polymorphism are two separate phenomena driven by different evolutionary forces.

Page 13: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

13

Gene substitution is the end result of an adaptive process whereby a new allele takes over future generations of the population if and only if it improves the fitness of the organism.

Polymorphism is maintained when the coexistence of two or more alleles at a locus is advantageous for the organism or the population.

Selectionism

Page 14: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

14

•Two separate evolutionary forces!

•Genetic polymorphism is permanent - the same alleles are maintained at constant frequencies for long periods of evolutionary time.

Page 15: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

15

AdaptationAn adaptation is a heritable character state that enhances the fitness of the organisms that bear it relative to alternative character states, especially ancestral character states in the population in which the adaptation evolved.

Page 16: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

16

Honey creepersHoney creepers

Page 17: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

17

AdaptationTranslation into Molecular Lingo:

An adaptation is a mutation that enhances the fitness of the organisms that carry it relative to the other alleles in the population.

Page 18: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

18

Extreme selectionism leads to The “Panglossian paradigm”

“It is proved… that things cannot be other than they are, for since everything was made for a purpose, it follows that everything is made for the best purpose.”

Dr. Pangloss in Dr. Pangloss in CandideCandide by Voltaire by Voltaire

Page 19: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

19

The Panglossian paradigm:

“Observe, for instance, the nose is formed for spectacles, therefore we wear spectacles.”

Page 20: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

20

The Panglossian paradigm:

“Legs were clearly intended for breeches , and we wear them.”

Dr. Pangloss in Dr. Pangloss in CandideCandide by Voltaire by Voltaire

Page 21: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

21

Abbott Handerson ThayerAbbott Handerson Thayer1849-19211849-1921

Page 22: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

22

Page 23: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

23

Page 24: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

24

Page 25: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

25

Page 26: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

26

1911

1901–1909: President of the United States. 1911: A 116-page article on animal coloration.

Page 27: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

27Motoo Kimura

The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution

Kimura M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level". Nature 217: 624–626. King JL, Jukes TH. 1969. Non-Darwinian Evolution. Science 164: 788–798.

Page 28: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

28

The majority of evolutionary changes and much of the variability within species are caused by random genetic drift of mutant alleles that are selectively neutral or nearly so.

Page 29: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

29

Neutrality, in the sense of the neutral theory, does not imply strict equality in fitness for all alleles. It only means that the fate of alleles is determined largely by random genetic drift.

Page 30: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

30

Selection may operate, but its intensity is too weak to offset the influences of chance effects. s< 1/(2Ne) Ne = effective

population size.

Page 31: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

31

That is, either the selection coefficient is small, or the effective population size is small. s< 1/(2Ne) Ne = effective

population size.

Page 32: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

32

According to the neutral theory, the frequency of alleles is determined by purely stochastic rules, and the picture that we obtain at any given time is merely a transient state representing a temporary frame from an ongoing dynamic process.

Page 33: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

33

The neutral theory regards substitution and polymorphism as two facets of the same phenomenon.

Gene substitution is a long and gradual process whereby the frequencies of mutant alleles increase or decrease randomly, until the alleles are ultimately fixed or lost by chance.

Page 34: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

34

Polymorphic loci consist of alleles that are either on their way to fixation or are about to become extinct. Thus, at any given time, some loci will possess alleles at frequencies that are neither 0% nor 100%. These are the polymorphic loci.

Page 35: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

35

All molecular manifestations that are relevant to the evolutionary process should be regarded as the result of a continuous process of mutational input and a concomitant random extinction or fixation of alleles.

Page 36: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

36

•A single evolutionary force.

•Genetic polymorphism is transient - allele frequencies fluctuate with time and the polymorphic alleles themselves are continuously replaced.

Page 37: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

37

A population that is free from selection can accumulate many polymorphic neutral alleles. Then, if a change in ecological circumstances occurs, some of the neutral alleles will no longer be neutral but deleterious, against which purifying selection may operate. After these alleles are removed, the population will become more adapted to its new circumstances than before.

Kimura (1983)

Page 38: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

38

Page 39: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

39

Page 40: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

40

The neutral theory does not preclude

adaptation.

Adaptive evolution may occur without adaptive

selection.

Page 41: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

41

The SliSligghtlhtlyy Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution +The SliSligghtlhtlyy Advantageous Model of Molecular Evolution = The Nearly Neutral Model of Evolution

Page 42: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

42

Mean

fitness

time

selectionism

neutralism

nearly neutral model

Page 43: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

43

Leigh Van Valen’s “Red Queen Hypothesis” (based “Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There” by Lewis Carroll (1871).

Alice complains to the Red Queen that she is exhausted from running, only to find she is still under the tree where she started. The Red Queen replies:

“Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that.”

Page 44: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

44

Neutralist-selectionist Neutralist-selectionist perceptionsperceptions

Page 45: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

45

A total resolution of the dispute between neutralists and selectionists would require knowledge of the distribution of fitness effects of mutant alleles.

Neutralist-selectionist Neutralist-selectionist perceptionsperceptions

Page 46: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

46

Page 47: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

47

The distribution of fitness effects of random mutations in vesicular stomatitis virus. Random mutations were introduced into the virus, and the fitnesses of the mutants were compared against the unmutated wild type. A fitness of less than one indicates that the mutant was less fit than the wild type, so the mutation was deleterious. A fitness of zero indicates that no mutated progeny were recovered, and that the mutation was therefore lethal.From: Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2007. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nature Rev. Genet. 8:610-618.

Page 48: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

48

Yeast

Page 49: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

49

Fact 1:

The cheetah is about to become extinct.

Page 50: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

50

Fact 2:

Cheetah populations are devoid of genetic variation.

Page 51: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

51

1. Selectionist explanation:

The cheetahs are depauperate of genetic variation and, therefore, they are on the verge of extinction.

Two explanations:

Page 52: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

52

2. Neutralist explanation:

The cheetahs are on the verge of extinction and, therefore, they are depauperate of genetic variation.

Two explanations:

Page 53: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

53

Page 54: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

54

Page 55: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

55

Page 56: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

56

If genetic variation reflects adaptive needs, then advantageous selection will quickly restore genetic variability to its pre-bottleneck levels.

Page 57: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

57

If genetic variation is merely random sampling, then post-bottleneck genetic variability will remain low for very long periods.

Page 58: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

58

Northern elephant seal, Mirounga angustirostris1922, Baja California, ~20 animals2000, Baja California, ~120,000 animalsGenetic variation = ~ 0

Page 59: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

59

Helix aspersa (brown garden snail)

Europe

California

H = 0.121

few individuals

Page 60: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

60

Helix aspersa (brown garden snail)

Europe

CaliforniaH = 0.000

H = 0.121

Large populations.Important pests of citrus trees.

Page 61: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

61

Neutrality tests(no need to know history)

Page 62: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

62

Page 63: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

63

Page 64: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

64

Page 65: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

65

Page 66: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

66

Page 67: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

67

Page 68: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

68

polymorphic fixed

synonymous X Y

nonsynonymous

Z W

Page 69: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

69

Page 70: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

70

Type of change

Fixed

Polymorphic

Synonymous 26 36

Nonsynonymous

21 2

Numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous fixed differences and polymorphisms at the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase locus between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans

The comparisons are based on 32 sequences from D. melanogaster and 12 sequences from D. simulans, with an aligned length of 1,705 bp.

Page 71: Mutationism, Neutralism, Selectionism

71

polymorphic fixed

synonymous X Y

nonsynonymous

Z W