6

Click here to load reader

Must Have Load Cases for Stress Analysis of a Typical Piping System Using Caesar II

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

piping

Citation preview

Must have Load cases for stress analysis of a typical piping system using Caesar IIThe main objectives of stress analysis is to ensureA. Structural Integrity (Design adequacy for the pressure of the carrying fluid,Failure against various loading in the life cycle and Limiting stresses below code allowable.)B. Operational Integrity (Limiting nozzle loads of the connected equipment within allowable values, Avoiding leakage at joints, Limiting sagging & displacement within allowable values.)C. Optimal Design (Avoiding excessive flexibility and also high loads on supporting structures. Aim towards an optimal design for both piping and structure.)To meet these objectives several load cases are required during stress analysis.This article will guide all the beginners with the methodology to build severalload cases which will be required for stress analysis.In this article we will use following notations for building load cases:WW=water filled weight of piping system,HP=Hydrotest Pressure,W=weight of pipe including content and insulation,P1=Internal Design pressure,T1=Operating temperature,T2=Maximum temperature,T3= Minimum temperature,WIN1, WIN2, WIN3 AND WIN4: windloads acting in some specific direction,U1, U2, U3 AND U4: uniform (seismic)loads acting in some specific direction.While analysis at a minimum the stress check is required for the below mentioned cases:a. Hydrotesting case: Pipelines are normally hydrotested before actual operation to ensure absence of leakage. Water is used as the testing medium. So during this situation pipe will be subjected to water weight and hydrotest pressure.Accordingly our first load case in Caesar II will be as mentioned below1. WW+HP HYDb. Operating case: When operation starts working fluid will flow through the piping at a temperature and pressure. So accordingly our operating load cases will be as mentioned below:2. W+T1+P1 OPE for operating temperature case3. W+T2+P1 OPE for maximum system temperature case4. W+T3+P1 OPE for minimum system temperature casec. Sustained Case: Sustained loads will exist throughout the plant operation.Weight and pressure are known as sustained loads. So our sustained load casewill be as follows:5. W+P1 SUSd. Occasional Cases: Piping may be subjected to occassional wind and seismicforces. So to check stresses in those situations we have to build thefollowing load cases:6. W+T1+P1+WIN1 OPE Considering wind from +X direction7. W+T1+P1+WIN2 OPE Considering wind from -X direction8. W+T1+P1+WIN3 OPE Considering wind from +Z direction9. W+T1+P1+WIN4 OPE Considering wind from -Z direction10. W+T1+P1+U1 OPE Considering seismic from +X direction11. W+T1+P1-U1 OPE Considering seismic from -X direction12 W+T1+P1+U2 OPE Considering seismic from +Z direction13 W+T1+P1-U2 OPE Considering seismic from -Z directionWhile stress analysis the above load cases form load case 6 to load case 13 is generated only to check loads at node points.To find occasional stresses we need to add pure occassional cases with sustained load and then compare with code allowable values. Following sets of load cases are built for that purpose.14. L6-L2 OCC Pure wind from +X direction15. L7-L2 OCC Pure wind from -X direction16. L8-L2 OCC Pure wind from +Z direction17. L9-L2 OCC Pure wind from -Z direction18. L10-L2 OCC Pure seismic from +X direction19. L11-L2 OCC Pure seismic from -X direction20. L12-L2 OCC Pure seismic from +Z direction21. L13-L2 OCC Pure seismic from -Z direction22. L14+L5 OCC Pure wind+Sustained23. L15+L5 OCC Pure wind+Sustained24. L16+L5 OCC Pure wind+Sustained25. L17+L5 OCC Pure wind+Sustained26. L18+L5 OCC Pure seismic+Sustained27. L19+L5 OCC Pure seismic+Sustained28. L20+L5 OCC Pure seismic+Sustained29. L21+L5 OCC Pure seismic+SustainedLoad cases from 22 to 29 will be used for checking occasional stresses with respect to code B 31.3 allowable (=1.33 times Sh value from code). Use scalar combination for load cases 22 to 29 above and algebraic combination for others as shown in figure attached below:

e. Expansion Case: Followingload cases are required for checking expansionstress range as per code30. L2-L5 EXP31. L3-L5 EXP32. L4-L5 EXP33. L3-L4 EXP for complete stress rangeThe above load cases (from 30 to 33) are used to check expansion stressThe above mentioned load cases are minimum required load cases to analysis any stress system. Out of the above load cases the load cases mentioned in point number 1, 5, and 22-33 are used for stress check. And load cases mentioned in point number 1 to 13 are used for checking restraint forces, displacements and nozzle load checking.Few additional load cases may be required for PSV connected systems, Rotary equipment connected systems.Seismic and Wind analysis may not be required every time. So those load cases can be deleted if the piping system does not fall under the purview of seismic and wind analysis by project specification. However to perform wind and seismic analysis proper related data must have to be entered in Caesar II spreadsheet (Will be discussed in my future posts).If the stress system involves use of imposed displacements (D) and forces (F) then those have to be added with the above load cases in the form of D1, D2 or F1, F2 as applicable.It is a better practice to keep1. Hydro and sustained stresses below 60% of code allowable2. Expansion and occasional stresses below 80% of code allowable3. Sustained sagging below 10 mm for process lines and below 3 mm for steam, two phase and flare lines4. Design/Maximum displacement below 75 mm for unit piping and below 200 mm in rack piping.