16
This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Multisite rainfall downscaling and disaggregation in a tropical urban area Qin, Xiaosheng; Lu, Yan 2013 Lu, Y., & Qin, X. (2014). Multisite rainfall downscaling and disaggregation in a tropical urban area. Journal of Hydrology, 509, 55‑65. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80072 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.027 © 2013 Elsevier. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Hydrology, Elsevier. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.027]. Downloaded on 31 May 2021 17:15:59 SGT

Multisite rainfall downscaling and disaggregation in a tropical … · 2020. 3. 7. · Figure 4: Comparison of downscaled results at site S46 from (a1-d1) single-site GLM combined

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg)Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Multisite rainfall downscaling and disaggregationin a tropical urban area

    Qin, Xiaosheng; Lu, Yan

    2013

    Lu, Y., & Qin, X. (2014). Multisite rainfall downscaling and disaggregation in a tropical urbanarea. Journal of Hydrology, 509, 55‑65.

    https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80072

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.027

    © 2013 Elsevier. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewedand accepted for publication by Journal of Hydrology, Elsevier. It incorporates referee’scomments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting,structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version isavailable at: [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.027].

    Downloaded on 31 May 2021 17:15:59 SGT

  • Figure List

    Figure 1: Study area and location of rain gauges

    Figure 2: The flowchart of study framework

    Figure 3: MAPE values of objective function at various K values for single-site

    disaggregation at S24

    Figure 4: Comparison of downscaled results at site S46 from (a1-d1) single-site GLM

    combined with KNN (S-G-K), and (a2-d2) multisite GLM. MAPE is based on the

    observed and average downscaled data

    Figure 5: Statistical properties of disaggregated hourly rainfall data using KNN and HYETOS

    during the verification period at the stations S24 (denoted as 1) and S46 (denoted

    as 2). MAPEK = MAPE value based on KNN; MAPEH = MAPE level based on

    HYETOS.

    Figure 6: Quantile-quantile plot between the observed and disaggregated data

    Figure 7: Statistical properties of disaggregated rainfall at satellite station S24 from KNN and

    MuDRain. MAPEK = MAPE value based on KNN; MAPEM = MAPE level based

    on MuDRain.

    Figure 8: Statistical properties of downscaled rainfall at S46 from GLM based on HadCM3

    A2 scenario during 1980-2010. Solid line represents the observed data; dash line is

    the downscaled envelop based on 20 ensembles

    Figure 9: Cross-correlation coefficients vs. distance for observed and downscaled rainfall.

    OBS = observed data; SIM = downscaled data; CC = correlation coefficient

    between observed data and average value of downscaled data.

  • Figure 10: Statistical properties of disaggregated rainfall at master station S46 using KNN.

    The plot shows a comparison of the observed time series with envelop curves

    generated from 20 ensembles from GLM downscaled daily data

    Figure 11: Statistical properties of disaggregated rainfall from multi-site disaggregation using

    MuDRain at satellite station S24

    Figure 12: Cross-correlation coefficients of observed and disaggregated hourly data against

    distance in (a) February, (b) June, (c) September, and (d) December. OBS =

    observed data; SIM = disaggregated data; CC = correlation coefficient between

    observed data and average value of disaggregated data.

    Figure 13: The mean and maximum hourly rainfall for the study region during baseline

    period (1980-2010) and future periods, including (a1 & a2) 2030s (2011-2040), (b1

    & b2) 2050s (2041-2070) and (c1 & c2) 2080s (2071-2100).

  • S66

    Kranji

    S44

    NTU

    S40

    Orchids

    S69

    Upp Peirce

    S46

    Golf Club

    S60

    Sentosa

    S55

    Woodbridge S24

    Changi

    Figure 1: Study area and location of rain gauges.

  • GLM

    Spatial downscaling

    (Generate multisite

    daily data)

    Single-site

    Temporal

    disaggregation

    (Generate hourly data at

    master station)

    Multi-site

    Temporal

    disaggregation

    (Generate hourly data at

    satellite stations)

    Project to future period

    (Generate hourly data at

    multiple sites)

    KNN

    HYETOS

    KNN

    MuDRain

    Selected

    Method

    Selected

    Method

    HadCM3 Predictors

    (Evaluate data quality;

    predict future condition)

    NCEP Predictors

    (Training & Verify

    GLM model)

    Single-site GLM +

    KNN

    Multisite GLM

    Selected

    Method

    Part 2: Model Application Part 1: Model Verification

    Figure 2: The flowchart of study framework.

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    0.30

    0.35

    MA

    PE

    va

    lue

    K number

    MAPE

    Figure 3: MAPE values of objective function at various K values for single-site

    disaggregation at S24.

  • J F M A M J J A S O N D4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    Mean

    d (

    mm

    /day)

    OBS

    SIM average

    SIM boundary

    (a1)

    S-G-K

    MAPE = 0.10

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    Me

    an

    d (

    mm

    /day

    )

    MAPE = 0.07(a2)

    M-G

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    ST

    Dd (

    mm

    /day)

    (b1)

    S-G-K

    MAPE = 0.07

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    ST

    Dd (

    mm

    /da

    y)

    MAPE = 0.07(b2)

    M-G

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Pw

    et d

    (c1)

    S-G-KMAPE = 0.10

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Pw

    et d

    MAPE = 0.06(c2)

    M-G

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    60

    90

    120

    150

    180

    210

    240

    Max

    d (

    mm

    /day)

    (d1)

    S-G-KMAPE = 0.17

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    60

    90

    120

    150

    180

    210

    240

    Ma

    xd (

    mm

    /da

    y)

    MAPE = 0.19(d2)

    M-G

    Figure 4: Comparison of downscaled results at site S46 from (a1-d1) single-site GLM

    combined with KNN (S-G-K), and (a2-d2) multisite GLM. MAPE is based on the observed

    and average downscaled data.

  • J F M A M J J A S O N D1

    2

    3

    4

    ST

    Dh

    (m

    m/h

    ou

    r)

    OBS KNN

    HYETOS

    (a1)

    MAPEK = 0.10

    MAPEH = 0.14

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    1

    2

    3

    4

    ST

    Dh (

    mm

    /ho

    ur)

    (a2) MAPEK = 0.09

    MAPEH = 0.14

    J F M A M J J A S O N D0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    AC

    1h

    (b1) MAPEK = 0.11

    MAPEH = 0.26

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    AC

    1h

    (b2) MAPEK = 0.20

    MAPEH = 0.36

    J F M A M J J A S O N D0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    Pw

    et h

    (c1) MAPEK = 0.09

    MAPEH = 0.36

    J F M A M J J A S O N D0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    Pw

    et h

    (c2) MAPEK = 0.15

    MAPEH = 0.38

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    Sk

    ew

    ne

    ss

    h

    (d1) MAPEK = 0.16

    MAPEH = 0.17

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    Sk

    ew

    ne

    ss

    h

    (d2) MAPEK = 0.21

    MAPEH = 0.15

    Figure 5: Statistical properties of disaggregated hourly rainfall data using KNN and HYETOS

    during the verification period at the stations S24 (denoted as 1) and S46 (denoted as 2).

    MAPEK = MAPE value based on KNN; MAPEH = MAPE level based on HYETOS.

  • Figure 6: Quantile-quantile plot between the observed and disaggregated data.

  • J F M A M J J A S O N D1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0 OBS

    KNN

    MuDRain

    ST

    Dh (

    mm

    /ho

    ur)

    (a) MAPEK = 0.09

    MAPEM = 0.15

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    AC

    1h

    (b) MAPEK = 0.22

    MAPEM = 0.08

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.03

    0.06

    0.09

    0.12

    0.15

    Pw

    et h

    (c) MAPEK = 0.10

    MAPEM = 0.09

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Skew

    ness

    h

    (d) MAPEK = 0.19

    MAPEM = 0.20

    Figure 7: Statistical properties of disaggregated rainfall at satellite station S24 from KNN and

    MuDRain. MAPEK = MAPE value based on KNN; MAPEM = MAPE level based on

    MuDRain.

  • J F M A M J J A S O N D4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11 OBS

    SIM envelope

    Me

    an

    d (

    mm

    /da

    y)

    (a)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    ST

    Dd (

    mm

    /day

    )

    (b)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Pw

    et d

    (c)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    80

    120

    160

    200

    240

    280

    Ma

    xd (

    mm

    /da

    y)

    (d)

    Figure 8: Statistical properties of downscaled rainfall at S46 from GLM based on HadCM3

    A2 scenario during 1980-2010. Solid line represents the observed data; dash line is the

    downscaled envelop based on 20 ensembles.

  • 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8 OBS Average SIM SIM

    Fitted curve for OBS

    Fitted curve for average SIM

    Co

    rre

    lati

    on

    Distance (km)

    CC = 0.99

    Figure 9: Cross-correlation coefficients vs. distance for observed and downscaled rainfall.

    OBS = observed data; SIM = downscaled data; CC = correlation coefficient between

    observed data and average value of downscaled data.

  • J F M A M J J A S O N D1.6

    2.0

    2.4

    2.8

    3.2S

    TD

    h (

    mm

    /ho

    ur)

    Observed

    Disaggregated

    envelope

    (a)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.16

    0.20

    0.24

    0.28

    0.32

    0.36

    0.40

    AC

    1h

    (b)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.06

    0.08

    0.10

    0.12

    0.14

    Pw

    et h

    (c)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    Sk

    ew

    nes

    sh

    (d)

    Figure 10: Statistical properties of disaggregated rainfall at master station S46 using KNN.

    The plot shows a comparison of the observed time series with envelop curves generated from

    20 ensembles from GLM downscaled daily data.

  • J F M A M J J A S O N D1.2

    1.6

    2.0

    2.4

    2.8S

    TD

    h (

    mm

    /ho

    ur)

    Observed

    Disaggregated

    envelope

    (a)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.18

    0.24

    0.30

    0.36

    0.42

    0.48

    AC

    1h

    (b)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.10

    0.12

    0.14

    0.16

    Pw

    et h

    (c)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    12

    16

    20

    24

    28

    32

    36

    Sk

    ew

    nes

    sh

    (d)

    Figure 11: Statistical properties of disaggregated rainfall from multi-site disaggregation using

    MuDRain at satellite station S24.

  • 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8 OBS SIM Ave

    SIM

    Fitted OBS

    Fitted SIM Ave

    Co

    rre

    lati

    on

    Distance (km)

    CC = 0.98

    (a)

    5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Co

    rre

    lati

    on

    Distance (km)

    CC = 0.98(b)

    5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    Co

    rre

    lati

    on

    Distance (km)

    (c) CC = 0.97

    5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8C

    orr

    ela

    tio

    n

    Distance (km)

    (d) CC = 0.98

    Figure 12: Cross-correlation coefficients of observed and disaggregated hourly data against

    distance in (a) February, (b) June, (c) September, and (d) December. OBS = observed data;

    SIM = disaggregated data; CC = correlation coefficient between observed data and average

    value of disaggregated data.

  • J F M A M J J A S O N D0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    Ra

    infa

    ll (

    mm

    /ho

    ur)

    Baseline

    H3A2 average H3B2 average

    H3A2 boundary H3B2 boundary

    (a1)

    Period: 2011-2040

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0

    40

    80

    120

    160

    200

    Ma

    xim

    um

    (m

    m/h

    ou

    r)

    (a2)

    Period: 2011-2040

    J F M A M J J A S O N D0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    Ra

    infa

    ll (

    mm

    /ho

    ur)

    (b1)

    Period: 2041-2070

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0

    40

    80

    120

    160

    200M

    ax

    imu

    m (

    mm

    /ho

    ur)

    Period: 2041-2070

    (b2)

    J F M A M J J A S O N D0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    Ra

    infa

    ll (

    mm

    /ho

    ur)

    (c1)

    Period: 2071-2099

    J F M A M J J A S O N D

    0

    40

    80

    120

    160

    200

    Ma

    xim

    um

    (m

    m/h

    ou

    r)

    Period: 2071-2099

    (c2)

    Figure 13: The mean and maximum hourly rainfall for the study region during baseline

    period (1980-2010) and future periods, including (a1 & a2) 2030s (2011-2040), (b1 & b2)

    2050s (2041-2070) and (c1 & c2) 2080s (2071-2100).