26
MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Staffing

Page 2: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Primary Purposes of Staffing

Attract

Train Develop Hire

Retain Reward

Page 3: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Eight Elements of the Staffing Process

Human resource planning — assessing current employees, forecasting future needs, and making plans to add or remove workers.

Recruiting — looking for qualified people inside or outside the company.

Selection — testing and interviewing candidates and hiring the best available.

Orientation — new employees learn about their surroundings.

Page 4: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Eight Elements of the Staffing Process (cont.)

Training and development.

Performance appraisal— establish the criteria for evaluating work.

Compensation — establishing pay and, in some cases, benefits.

Employment decisions — transfers, promotions, demotions, layoffs, and firings.

Page 5: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Best Defense Against Accusations of Discrimination or Bias in Hiring Practices

• It is a business necessity—the company must do what it does to provide for its continued existence.

• It honors a bona fide seniority system (BFSS).

• It acknowledges a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ).

• It is job related—that is, it is predictive of success or failure on a specific job.

Page 6: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Federal Guidelines List Minorities As

• Hispanic-surnamed Americans

• Asians and Pacific Islanders

• African Americans not of Hispanic origin

• Native Americans

• Native Alaskans

• Hispanic-surnamed Americans

• Asians and Pacific Islanders

• African Americans not of Hispanic origin

• Native Americans

• Native Alaskans

Page 7: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Federal Law and the Differently Able

• Have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.

• Have a record of such impairment.

• Are regarded as having such an impairment.

Page 8: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Two Basic RemediesWhen Discrimination is Proved

1. Reinstatement

2. Recovery of lost pay

Page 9: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Limits Placed on Punitive Damages

Between 15 and 100 employees:

$50,000

Over 500 employees: $300,000

Between 201 and 500 employees:

$200,000

Between 101 and 200 employees:

$100,000

Page 10: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Sexual Harassment Includes

Unwelcome sexual advances

Requests for sexual favors

Other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature

Page 11: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Issues for Drug Testing

Tests can reveal conditions that an employer has no business knowing about.

Drug tests can produce false positive results.

Page 12: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Human Resource Planning Process

Prepare Job

Analysis

Prepare Human

Resource Inventory

Prepare Human

Resource Forecast

Compare Inventory

and Forecast

Plans for Reduction

in Jobs

Status Quo

Plans for Growth in

Jobs

Strategic Plans

Employee History

Page 13: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

To Do Their Work Job Analysts

Observe the job holder.

Review questionnaires.

Conduct interviews.

Form a committee to analyze, review, and summarize the results.

Page 14: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Job Analysts Produce

A job description

A job specification

Page 15: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Human Resource Inventory

• Provides information about an organization’s present personnel.

• Is a catalog of:– Skills– Abilities– Interests– Training– Experience– Qualifications

Page 16: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Test

• Any criterion or performance measure used as a basis for any employment decision.

• Measures include:– Interviews– Application forms– Psychological and performance exams– Physical requirements for a job

• Tests used for screening should attempt to measure only performance capabilities.

Page 17: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Reference Checks(Kleiman, “From,” 1992)

• 84 percent verify education and past-employment claims.

• 60 percent contact persons listed as references.

• 63 percent review school transcripts.

Page 18: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Training

Those who design training or development programs must create needs assessments to determine what the content and objectives of the programs should be.

The people who execute the programs must know how to teach, how people learn, and what individuals need to be taught.

All participants—trainers, developers, and those receiving the training or development—must be willing participants.

Page 19: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Training Five Major Aims

1. Increase knowledge and skills

1. Increase knowledge and skills

2. Increase motivation to succeed

2. Increase motivation to succeed

5. Increase quality and productivit

y

5. Increase quality and productivit

y

4. Improve morale

4. Improve morale

3. Improve chances for

advancement

3. Improve chances for

advancement

Page 20: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Forms of In-House Training

On-the-job training

Machine-based training

Vestibule training

Job rotation

Internet-based training

Page 21: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Purposes of Performance Appraisals

Provide feedback.

Develop individuals’ plans for improving.

Determine whether rewards are due or whether warning or termination is required.

Identify areas for additional growth.

Develop and enhance the relationships.

Give the employee a clear understanding in relation to expectations.

Page 22: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Appraisal SystemsThree Major Components

1. The criteria (factors and standards) against which the employee’s performance is measured.

2. The rating that summarizes how well the employee is doing.

3. The methods used to determine the ratings.

Page 23: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Portion of an Objective Performance Appraisal System

Performance Aspect

Self-ImprovementConsider the desire to expand present capabilities in both depth and breadth.No opportunity to observe.

Has no interest in learning additional duties.

Has limited interest in expanding job assignments. Has little interest in preparing for advancement.

Has shown extra effort to learn additional duties. Has undertaken advancement preparation.

Has demonstrated interest in additional assignments. Has shown some interest in and preparation for advancement.

Is very inquisitive concerning all phases of job-related assignments. Has undertaken advancement preparation.

Rating

1 2 3 4 5

1.

Page 24: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Portion of an Objective Performance Appraisal System (cont.)

AttendanceConsider the regularity with which the employee reports to work.

Excessively absent.

Frequently absent.

Rarely absent.

Occasionally absent.

Almost never absent.

2.

PunctualityConsider number of occasions late.Punctuality is not essential to this job.

Excessively tardy.

Frequently tardy.

Rarely tardy.Occasionally tardy.

Almost never tardy.

3.

Performance Aspect Rating

1 2 3 4 5

Page 25: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Portion of an Objective Performance Appraisal System (cont.)

Work PlanningConsider how the work load is planned and organized for maximum efficiency. No opportunity to observe.

Unsystematic, unable to organize work load.

Fair on routine but unable to organize variations effectively.

Skillful in organizing and planning work. Meets emergencies promptly.

Efficient under normal conditions. Gives priority to important jobs.

Exceptional efficiency. Keeps priority items in proper perspective.

4.

Performance Aspect Rating

1 2 3 4 5

Page 26: MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Staffing

MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters © 2002 South-Western

Appraisals are Likely to be Illegal if:

• The instruments used are invalid.• Standards are not job related and objective.• The results of the process have a disparate impact on women,

the disabled, or minorities.• The scoring method is not standardized.• People who are performing similar jobs are evaluated

differently, using different forms, factors, or processes.• Evaluative criteria are not developed according to EEOC

guidelines.• Employees are not warned of declining or substandard

performance.• The evaluation is not based on the employee’s current duties.