Multi Brand Retailing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Multi Brand Retailing

    1/3

    Multi Brand Retailing

    Opening up of FDI in Multi brand retail a huge mood lifter for the dim businessenvironment

    A means to tackle high food prices resulting from lack of proper infrastructure in terms ofback end logistics, cold storage and warehousing improve production and distribution

    efficiencies

    Possibility of Joint ventures and a could open up flood gates for a host of jobopportunities

    Online Multi Brand Retailing

    FDI in online Multi brand retail continues to be restricted to brick and mortar stores andthe online format has not yet been touched

    While the global retail giants have got clarity on the FDI norms in single and multi-brandretail, a host of online shopping firms and their legal representatives have sought clarity

    from the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) on how these norms will

    impact them. This is because the Press Note 1 of 2012 issued earlier in the year imposed

    FDI restrictions on e-commerce firms engaging in e-retail in the business-to-consumer

    space while allowing 100% FDI in those engaging in business-to-business retailing.

    Foreign firms, which are merely a listing platform for brands, are welcome to operatein India. But, foreign firms that buy and sell any goods or services are still banned from

    conducting their activities source : DIPP Currently e-commerce companies have been able to circumvent FDI limits by some multi-

    tiered structuring- Eg. Such companies engage only in B2B e-commerce and not in retail

    trading. While the service delivery model doesnt need regulatory approvals, a trading

    model will have to toe the FDI regulatory norms. This technically means that though

    Walmart is welcome to invest in India, its online arm still would face regulatory hurdles.

    How does new FDI norm for retail affect e commerce portals -

  • 7/30/2019 Multi Brand Retailing

    2/3

    Table 1

    CATEGORY Example Impact

    Foreign sites operating

    outside Indian shores

    Amazon, Bestbuy No impact unless they want to

    set up their own venture in

    India

    Foreign sites operating in

    India, but only lists products

    eBay.com, expedia.com Business would run as usual,

    as they do not have any

    inventory

    Indian Sites Flipkart.com, snapdeal.com Will come under FDI rule if

    they want foreign investment

    Single Brand Retailing Dell No impact as FDI norms for

    multibrand retailing

    B2B portals Indiamart.com,

    metaljunction.com

    Until now 100% allowed, but

    now FDI only upto 51 %, thushuge impact

    Since business model of brick and mortar stores very different from that of e-retailers, interms of inventory management, warehousing and sourcing, FDI policy for such a model

    should be explicitly specified.

    Normally online retailers set up business in two entities- one handling the warehousingbusiness in which 100% FDI is allowed. The other being the online retail shops like that

    of say flipkart.com or jabong.com. All overseas investments have been coming in the

    entity hosting the warehousing business, which legally can be challenged

    Need for clarity on this issue is essential as e retailers like Flipkart.com have raised morethan $300 million through foreign funding -

    http://www.financialexpress.com/news/online-shopping-firms-seek-clarity-from-dipp-

    on-retail-fdi-norms/1005044/0

    Challenges and Recommendations

    POLITICAL CHALLENGES

    Policy under vehement opposition and thus although FDI has been opened at thenational level, independent states have the decision making power with regard to

    implementation of the policy - 26 out of the 45 cities eligible to allow FDI multi-brand

    retail operation in the country are located in states that are ruled by opposition( cities

    with population more than 10 lakh as per 2011 census eligible for this policy)

    Early entrants like Walmart cannot capitalise as majority of its cash and carry stores arein Non Congress ruled states and convincing opposition parties is a challenge.

    http://www.financialexpress.com/news/online-shopping-firms-seek-clarity-from-dipp-on-retail-fdi-norms/1005044/0http://www.financialexpress.com/news/online-shopping-firms-seek-clarity-from-dipp-on-retail-fdi-norms/1005044/0http://www.financialexpress.com/news/online-shopping-firms-seek-clarity-from-dipp-on-retail-fdi-norms/1005044/0http://www.financialexpress.com/news/online-shopping-firms-seek-clarity-from-dipp-on-retail-fdi-norms/1005044/0http://www.financialexpress.com/news/online-shopping-firms-seek-clarity-from-dipp-on-retail-fdi-norms/1005044/0
  • 7/30/2019 Multi Brand Retailing

    3/3

    In such a case, the individual governments in power should take a consensus of the

    various stakeholders and key beneficiaries before making any decision on their own.

    Other Challenges

    There is also a dearth of buildings with the right configuration, where the logisticsof retail can be handled in a seamless, cost-effective manner.

    Prices of real estate too high, which could be a problem that big retailers have to dealwith in future.

    Foreign players worried about the clause of mandatory $100 million investment whichis to be done within the first 3 years. They want clarity on whether the norm requires

    them to spend additional money on supply chain and logistics even if they acquire front-

    end retail companies in India. They are also unhappy that expenditure on land costs and

    rentals will not be counted as investment in back-end infrastructure.

    Policy still needs clarity with regards to companies buying retail assets in the country-whether the money can be used to buy front end company or should it be used only toset up new stores in FDIcompliant states.

    For this problem , each application should be examined on merit. As long as it falls

    within the parameters of existing laws, and the FDI policy, it should be allowed

    Another challenge facing the policy implementation is the clause of 30 % sourcingnorms.The government has stipulated that foreign retailers will have to buy 30% ofwhat they buy from small vendors. It has further said if the investment of a vendor in

    plant and machinery exceeds $1 million, it will no longer be considered a small-scale

    vendor for the purpose of computing the 30% local sourcing requirement. Organisations

    like IKEA and Louis Vitton are asking the government to relax these norms