2
Fr{HIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON I James Brown, according L to Dr. Daniel Levitin, a cognitive scientist at Montreal's McGill University: As "Papa's Got a BrandNew Bagl'plays, the primary auditory cortices are activated,asis your cerebellum - the part of the brain that controls motor functions and keeps time. Your visual cortex lights up, too, perhaps because an image of the Godfatherof Soul doing splits at theApollo has enteredyour mind. At the moment, Levitin happens to be looking at my brain, on monitors attached to an MRI machine. I'm just one of a dozen peo- ple the forty.nine.year-old scientist has scanned with MRIs as part of his ground- breaking research into why music is so im- portant to us -work that has established him of research: Before he got his doctorate in 1996, he helped produce albums for Chris Isaak and Blue Oyster Cult, and piayed in punk bands. In his recent book, the \eu %r( Times best seller This Is Your Brain on Music, Levitin suggests that the human brain is hard-wired to understand music. perhaps because it preceded language as a mode of communication. "'When we hear music, not speech, it stimulates these very ancient, primitive parts ofthe brain that are below the level ofcon- scious thought," he says. Levitin came to his conclu- sion by looking at people's brain function as they listened to real music, fromAC/DC and Ludacris to Joni Mitchell and , Beethoven. "Earlier experiments would eitheruse a sine-tone gener- \, ator or the experimenter would write some melody and see howwell people could remember it," says Levitin, whose subjects showed a much stronger reaction to music than in previous studies, with several differ. ent areas ofthe brain activated, including those connected to motor skills, emotion, visual stimuli and pleasure. Levitin's journey began in the late r97os, when he dropped out ofcollege to play bass in the San Francisco punk band the Mortals. He went on to become a producer, develop- ing a masterful ear. In 1992, Levitin noticed that third-generation copies had been used to reissue seven Steely Dan albums, causing the band's label to recall them. Later, Levitin was hired to help produce a Steely Dan com- pilation and worked on hits collections from Santana and Stevie'Wonder. (A Stevie'Won- der gold record hangs above his desk.) Fifteen : I years ago, Levitiris fascination with the sci. I ence ofsound led him to Stanford. where he began to study the deep connections be. tween music and memory. In one early study, he asked people to sing their favorite pop songs offthe tops oftheir heads. "It was astonishing," he says. "Most people - nonmusicians - were able to sing the song at or very near its actual pitch, and. at or very near its actual tempo." In his lab,\ take on Beethoven's 5th Sym- phony played entirely using powertools. Likemost people, I was ableto identify nearlyall of them instantly. 'Your brain has to extract the featuresof pitch and rhythm, ignoring timbre and the soundofthe musical in. struments," he says. "To give deve sclentlsts have found a haven in Levitin's lab. In the r98os, Susan Rogers was a top recording engineer, working on classic albums including Prince's Purple Rain and Sign O' the Times. She is now a doctoral can- didate in his program. "At first, if you love music, this seems like the antithesis of the sort of involvement you want to have with it," she says. "It's like, 'Oh, no, don'r take away the beauty.' Then I started reading Dan Levitin's papers, and I realized that of everybody out there, he's the only person who would understand." Rogers'research includes a study that focuses on the brain's reaction to consonant and dissonant chords. "I was interested in the evolution ofthe music faculry," she says. 'Vhat is the origin of our appreciation for consonance? Is it because we're innatelv ore. wired to favor some type of i.rte.vai o.rer derstand music. which has left us with a deep connection to it. But what drove that need is among the rnany unanswered questions. "Brain science is the study of the most complex thing in the known universe," she says. "There is nothing more complex in terms of the boards that makehis Laboratory for Music diately identi$r as "Eleanor Rigby." He does I consonant music than we hear dissonant?,, Levitin replicatesanother study by playing I another, or is it just a function of what weve the frst half-second of a song, which I imme- | learned, that we just happento hear more the same with several well-known pieces of I Rogers'theories, like Levitin's, point to an music,includingobscurecoverversionsanda I evolutionary need for human brains to un- had somany questionsrtt says Levitin. you an idea ofhow complicated this is, there's possibilities ofconnections - even stars and ": ,.o"pitir * rY"orld rhd .* e,+r.'l galaxies are sort of arepeating pattern ofvery ) Levtttn's conclusronilre at odds with ) few elements. This is the equivalent of ex. some of his contemporaries, including emiy' ploring uncharted terrirory." MtrsicUnder theMicroscope 3 o F' ) F} ,.i o r) (t) o o f{ ) d (t) FI 'o X r5 o ,.1 ID o (.} ) o { 9) o o (- r.i f-l s) t{ (t 4 <i F. r.t o l- (+ o o o nent Harvard neurolinguist Steven Pinker, who has described music as "auditorycheese- cake," enjoyable brrt not essential to human as one of the world's Perception, Cognit ity come from? Whjare some people cre. ative and others aren't? \tr/hat is on when vou hear music?" tinls trni-quely qualified for his area

MtrsicUnder - Miami UniversityFr{HIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON I James Brown, according L to Dr. Daniel Levitin, a cognitive scientist at Montreal's McGill University: As "Papa's Got a Brand

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

F r { H I S I S Y O U R B R A I N O N

I James Brown, accordingL to Dr. Daniel Levitin, a

cognitive scientist at Montreal'sMcGill University: As "Papa's

Got a Brand New Bagl'plays, theprimary auditory cort ices areactivated, as is your cerebellum -the part of the brain that controlsmotor functions and keeps time.Your visual cortex lights up, too,perhaps because an image of theGodfather of Soul doing splits attheApollo has enteredyour mind.

At the moment, Levitin happens to belooking at my brain, on monitors attached toan MRI machine. I'm just one of a dozen peo-ple the forty.nine.year-old scientist hasscanned with MRIs as part of his ground-breaking research into why music is so im-portant to us -work that has established him

of research: Before he got his doctorate in1996, he helped produce albums for ChrisIsaak and Blue Oyster Cult, and piayed inpunk bands. In his recent book, the \eu %r(Times best sel ler This Is Your Brain onMusic, Levitin suggests that the humanbrain is hard-wired to understand music.perhaps because it preceded language as amode of communication. "'When

we hearmusic, not speech, it stimulates these veryancient, primitive parts ofthe brainthat are below the level ofcon-scious thought," he says.

Levitin came to his conclu-s i on by l ook ing a t peop le ' sbrain function as they listenedto real music, fromAC/DC andLudacris to Joni Mitchell and ,

Beethoven. "Earlier experiments

would eitheruse a sine-tone gener- \,ator or the experimenter would writesome melody and see howwell people couldremember it," says Levitin, whose subjectsshowed a much stronger reaction to musicthan in previous studies, with several differ.ent areas ofthe brain activated, includingthose connected to motor skills, emotion,visual stimuli and pleasure.

Levitin's journey began in the late r97os,when he dropped out ofcollege to play bassin the San Francisco punk band the Mortals.He went on to become a producer, develop-

ing a masterful ear. In 1992, Levitin noticed

that third-generation copies had been used

to reissue seven Steely Dan albums, causing

the band's label to recall them. Later, Levitin

was hired to help produce a Steely Dan com-

pilation and worked on hits collections from

Santana and Stevie'Wonder. (A Stevie'Won-der gold record hangs above his desk.) Fifteen :

I years ago, Levitiris fascination with the sci.I ence ofsound led him to Stanford. where he

began to study the deep connections be.

tween music and memory.

In one early study, he asked people to sing

their favorite pop songs offthe tops oftheir

heads. "It was astonishing," he says.

"Most

people - nonmusicians - were able to sing

the song at or very near its actual pitch, and.

at or very near its actual tempo." In his lab,\

take on Beethoven's 5th Sym-phony played entirely usingpower tools. Like most people, Iwas able to identify nearly all ofthem instantly. 'Your brain hasto extract the features of pitchand rhythm, ignoring timbreand the sound ofthe musical in.struments," he says. "To give

deve sclentlstshave found a haven in Levitin's

lab. In the r98os, Susan Rogers was a toprecording engineer, working on c lassicalbums including Prince's Purple Rain andSign O' the Times. She is now a doctoral can-didate in his program. "At

first, if you lovemusic, this seems like the antithesis of thesort of involvement you want to have withit," she says. "It's

like, 'Oh, no, don'r take

away the beauty.' Then I started readingDan Levitin's papers, and I realized that ofeverybody out there, he's the only personwho would understand."

Rogers ' research includes a study thatfocuses on the brain's reaction to consonantand dissonant chords. "I was interested inthe evolution ofthe music faculry," she says.'Vhat

is the origin of our appreciation forconsonance? Is it because we're innatelv ore.wired to favor some type of i.rte.vai o.rer

derstand music. which has leftus with a deep connection toit. But what drove that need isamong the rnany unansweredquestions. "Brain

science is thes tudy o f t he mos t comp lexthing in the known universe,"she says. "There

is nothingmore complex in terms of the

boards that make his Laboratory for Music diately identi$r as "Eleanor

Rigby." He does I consonant music than we hear dissonant?,,

Levitin replicates another study by playing I another, or is it just a function of what wevethe frst half-second of a song, which I imme- | learned, that we just happen to hear more

the same with several well-known pieces of I Rogers'theories, like Levitin's, point to anmusic,includingobscurecoverversionsanda I evolutionary need for human brains to un-

had so manyquestionsrttsays Levitin.

you an idea ofhow complicated this is, there's possibilities ofconnections - even stars and":

,.o"pitir * rY"orld rhd .* e,+r.'l galaxies are sort of a repeating pattern ofvery

) Levtttn's conclusronilre at odds with ) few elements. This is the equivalent of ex.some of his contemporaries, including emiy' ploring uncharted terrirory."

MtrsicUndertheMicroscope

3oF')F},.ior)(t)oof{)d(t)FI' oXr5o,.1IDo(.})o{9)

o

o(-r.i

f-ls)t{

(t4<iF .r.tol-

(+oo

o

nent Harvard neurolinguist Steven Pinker,who has described music as "auditorycheese-

cake," enjoyable brrt not essential to human

as one of the world's

Perception, Cognit

ity come from? Whjare some people cre.ative and others aren't? \tr/hat ison when vou hear music?"

tinls trni-quely qualified for his area

what Eminem and Mozart Do to your Brain..., using a Magnetic Resonance

;;t. j., lmagingmachine,Levitincandetect which areas ofthe brainare respondingto music bytracking blood flow (the moreblood in a particular region,the more activity). In thisstudy, Levitin played me

three pieces of music throughheadphones while I was in the

MRl3 Mozart's Symphony No.4t,James Brown's "papa's Got a Brand New

Bag" and Eminem's'The Real slim Shady." Ofcourse, many areas of the brain are active atany given time, so in order to producemeaningful results, one scan must becompared with another. The first scan showsthe areas of my brain that were activatedwhen listening to Mozart, as compared tosilence. The second shows the areas activatedby Brown, as compared to Mozart, and thethird shows the brain activity initiated byEminem, as compared to Brown. E.S.

M,"1c�= i n, u,".- , [ l i \ ,{

-rto p"

0 P n ; u ) ] w ' 7 ,f i x 7