11
Reducing Carbon Footprint MTN Group TowerXchange Meetup Africa 2018 MTN Group is listed in the FTSE/JSE Responsible Investment Index Series Top 30. FTSE Russell (the trading name of FTSE International Limited and Frank Russell Company) confirms that TEST has been independently assessed according to the FTSE4Good criteria, and has satisfied the requirements to become a constituent of the FTSE4Good Index Series. Created by the global index provider FTSE Russell, the FTSE4Good Index Series is designed to measure the performance of companies demonstrating strong Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices. The FTSE4Good indices are used by a wide variety of market participants to create and assess responsible investment funds and other products.”

MTN Group - TowerXchange · MTN Group TowerXchange Meetup Africa 2018 MTN Group is listed in the FTSE/JSE Responsible Investment Index Series Top 30. FTSE Russell (the trading name

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Reducing Carbon Footprint

    MTN Group

    TowerXchange Meetup Africa 2018

    MTN Group is listed in the FTSE/JSE Responsible Investment Index Series Top 30. FTSE Russell (the trading name of FTSE International Limited and Frank Russell Company) confirms that TEST has been

    independently assessed according to the FTSE4Good criteria, and has satisfied the requirements to become a constituent of the FTSE4Good Index Series. Created by the global index provider FTSE Russell, the FTSE4Good Index Series is designed to measure the performance of companies demonstrating strong

    Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices. The FTSE4Good indices are used by a wide variety of market participants to create and assess responsible investment funds and other products.”

  • 2

    Agenda

    •  Context for MTN’s energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction efforts, in order to reduce MTN’s contribution to climate change

    •  MTN’s current energy use and GHG performance

    •  The role of infrastructure owners/ tower management companies in GHG emission reductions

  • 3

    Climate change context for energy management To mitigate global temperature rises to less than 2°C (ideally 1,5 °C) before the end of the century, the world must implement science-based targets to limit greenhouse gas emissions and transition to low-carbon economies

    •  GHGs need to decline below current levels before 2030, then drop drastically to limit climate change to 2°C before 2100

    Why How Status

    •  China & UK de-carbonised by 5,2% in 2017 (best global progress) but…

    •  US dropped out of Paris Agreement (second largest GHG emitter globally)

    •  Concerning: Current annual average emissions reduction rate of 2.6% will result in depletion of carbon budgets within 20 years

    •  However, increasing investment in renewable energy continues especially as clean power is increasing in price parity with grid / fossil fuel power): likely renewable energy will nearly 50% of global supply by 2050, reducing GHG emissions. Further reductions expected from energy efficiency improvements

    Who

    •  Carbon “budgets” adopted by countries: governments and industry need to work together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. National climate plans/ nationally determined contributions by countries to be reviewed every five years

    •  Catastrophic precipitation changes: droughts, flooding, storm intensity

    •  Sea level rises threatening coastal cities

    •  Deforestation, fishing stock and biodiversity losses accelerated (human reliance on environmental resources impacted)

    •  Fresh water impact, agriculture, fishing, health, social stability & GDP impacts of climate change

  • 4

    GHG emissions per ICT category ICTs contribute up to 2,5% (2010) of global GHG emissions (if unchecked, can grow to 14% by 2040): networks contribute ¼ of ICT emissions globally

    •  Issue: –  Communication networks (cellular base stations & towers,

    switches, etc.) contribute 24% of ICT emissions •  Challenges:

    –  How to increase use of environmentally-friendly sources of energy (solar, wind, hydro, hydrogen, etc.) under conditions of geographical dispersion, energy consumption profile due to local environmental conditions, and technical considerations, etc.

    –  Risk of greater focus on alternative energy investments than on increasing energy efficiency of existing infrastructure: role of both aspects in reducing GHG emissions

  • 5

    Stakeholder focus on MTN’s GHG emissions While regulators have not yet specifically focused on ICT emissions, general regulatory oversight is increasing; investors are already demanding transparency into how MTN is reducing energy use and GHG emissions

    Investors

    •  CDP: >827 investor organisations; ≈ USD100 trillion assets under management: MTN report submissions annually since 2009

    •  MTN listed in JSE-FTSE4Good Responsible Investment Index Top 30 index

    Climate changes risks are material to investment decision-making: to attract investments, companies have to demonstrate their

    environmental credentials

    •  Carbon taxes reported as a risk in three MTN countries, increasing energy costs

    •  Mandatory emissions reporting has been imposed on all South African organisations with total national installed capacity of 10MW: first report submitted for South African Department of Environmental Affairs in 2018

    Regulators Climate-change related regulatory risks are increasing in the

    countries in which MTN operates

    Risks : changes in precipitation (extremes & droughts)/ water shortages & mean temperature rises lead to greater energy use & cooling costs; flooding/ sea level rises/ increased tropical cyclones & changes in mean temperature can damage infrastructure

  • 6

    MTN’s Energy Consumption & GHG Emissions MTN’s networks are the largest consumers of energy in the Group, and contribute 84% to the Group’s total GHG emissions

  • 7

    How MTN reduces GHG emissions By focusing on a combination of efficiencies & investments in lower-carbon technologies, we are able to reduce GHG emissions at existing MTN-owned sites: similar initiatives by our TowerCo partners further reduce emissions

    Cogeneration 3.76%

    Diesel hybrid BTS sites 27.40%

    Energy efficiency: cooling (BTS)

    17.55%

    Energy efficiency: cooling (Data Centre) 0.00%

    Energy efficiency: optimisation 1.04%

    Energy efficiency: optimisation (BTS) 7.63%

    Fuel optimisation 0.11%

    Fuel switch 8.28%

    Hybrid diesel BTS sites 9.46%

    Hydromix diesel 0.42%

    Solar CSP 0.10%

    Solar hybrid BTS sites 19.69%

    Vehicle fuel reduction 2.61%

    Efficient Cooling (Data Centre) 0.73% Efficient Cooling (BTS Site) 1.18%

    (blank) 0.06%

    GHG saving per initiative type (tCO2e / year)

    Draft FY18 Data – to be updated

  • 8

    Example of GHG reduction at network site Our investments can make a difference: a 14,1 kW hybrid solar-wind system helps us avoid approximately 15 tCO2e p.a.

    Results

    Background What We Did

    •  Opex savings: approximately R39, 530 annually (based on 2015 grid power rates). •  Total kWh electricity from grid avoided p.a.: approximately 16,000kWh

    •  Carbon emissions avoided p.a.: approximately 15 tonnes

    •  Lack of grid power in area •  Significant cost of grid power even if connection

    to site could be extended

    •  Grid is powered by coal, which would result in

    increased GHG outputs

    Installed 6.6kW solar & 7.5kW wind hybrid system

  • 9

    Scope 3 Emissions from Outsourced Sites However, despite MTN’s efforts, our emissions from subscribers are growing annually: emissions from outsourced network sites are now predominantly driving the Group’s GHG outputs

    •  2014: 0,0069 tCO2e •  2015: 0,0072 tCO2e

    •  2016: 0,0071 tCO2e

    •  2017: 0,0091 tCO2e

    GHG Intensity/ Subscriber (tonnes CO2e) Annual Emissions (tonnes CO2e): Scope 1, 2 and 3

  • 10

    Opportunities for partnerships ICTs are essential to achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals: partnerships between operators and infrastructure owners can make meaningful impacts

    •  We are seeking partners that are keen to pursue proofs of concepts, pilots and investments in solutions that help us manage our use of energy and drive down our greenhouse gas emissions

    •  Amongst other considerations, we would recommend that our partners:

    –  Actively drive and energy and carbon reduction strategy

    –  Incorporate efficiency into design and retrofit plans

    –  Introduce energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction targets are key performance indicators for business units

    –  Demonstrate evidence of climate change risk identification and management in business processes

    –  Use global standards such as the CDP to transparently report on material risks and opportunities posed to their business by climate change, and actions taken to reduce GHG emissions. Work with network operators to share

    data in order to maximise transparency in disclosures

    –  Ideally incorporate carbon emission considerations and price climate change impacts into business cases/ new investments wherever possible

  • https://www.mtn.com/en/mtn-group/sustainability/Pages/default.aspx | [email protected] [email protected]