PowerPoint Presentation

25-May-151Project Report onEvaluation of factors affecting communication and feedback between students and faculty in CMS.DU from Students perspectiveForManagerial Skill Development(20400)

Submitted By: MBA 2nd SEMESTERGROUP - E:Avi Ranjan Dutta, Roll No 05Mintu Das, Roll No 26Pompi Saikia, Roll No 38Priyanka Mech, Roll No 41Sushmita Roy, Roll No - 55Syed Sadique, Roll No - 57125-May-152Project based onCommunication issues between student and facultyINTRODUCTION225-May-153OBJECTIVEProblems faced by students with the faculty.Verify the sources of the problems.Relationship status between the students and faculty.Personality of the students hampering communication.Behavior of faculty hampering the communication.Perspective of the students towards their teachers.To find out325-May-154RESEARCH METHODOLOGYExploratory research.425-May-155SOURCES OF DATA AND SAMPLE SIZEGroup discussionOpen ended interviewBehavioural observationQuestionnairesOrdinal categories used20 samples - collected from both the MBA 2nd and MBA 4th Semester students form CMS.DU. 525-May-156THE QUESTIONNAIREPreformatted personality test - The Big Five Personality Test courtesy ipip.ori.org4-point scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree).Reliability tests625-May-157THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TESTStatistical study of responses to personality items.Psychology - five broad dimensions ofpersonalityto describe human personalityThefive-factor model(FFM) - 1. Openness, 2. Conscientiousness, 3. Extraversion, 4. Agreeableness, 5. Neuroticism. Global factor - a cluster of correlated primary factors are found725-May-158THE FIVE FACTORSOpenness to experience: (inventive/curiousvs.consistent/cautious). Conscientiousness: (efficient/organizedvs.easy-going/careless).Extraversion: (outgoing/energeticvs.solitary/reserved).Agreeableness: (friendly/compassionatevs.analytical/detached).Neuroticism: (sensitive/nervousvs.secure/confident).825-May-159The Big Five Personality Test5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. 1-50 mark on the scale 1-5, 1=disagree, 2=slightly disagree, 3=neutral, 4=slightly agree and 5=agree was used.

E = 20 + (1) ___ - (6) ___ + (11) ___ - (16) ___ + (21) ___ - (26) ___ + (31) ___ - (36) ___ + (41) ___ - (46) ___ = _____A = 14 - (2) ___ + (7) ___ - (12) ___ + (17) ___ - (22) ___ + (27) ___ - (32) ___ + (37) ___ + (42) ___ + (47) ___ = _____C = 14 + (3) ___ - (8) ___ + (13) ___ - (18) ___ + (23) ___ - (28) ___ + (33) ___ - (38) ___ + (43) ___ + (48) ___ = _____N = 38 - (4) ___ + (9) ___ - (14) ___ + (19) ___ - (24) ___ - (29) ___ - (34) ___ - (39) ___ - (44) ___ - (49) ___ = _____O = 8 + (5) ___ - (10) ___ + (15) ___ - (20) ___ + (25) ___ - (30) ___ + (35) ___ + (40) ___ + (45) ___ + (50) ___ = _____

The scores calculated are between zero and forty.925-May-1510EVALUATION OF DATAStudents communication skillsCBCS SystemClass and course structureFaculty BehaviorStudents PersonalityKEY POINTS:1025-May-1511EVALUATION OF DATAOpen ended interviews with the original respondentsGroup DiscussionsObservational analysisTo avoid pitfalls1125-May-1512FINDINGSKey factors:Facultys behavior and approachStudent Faculty relationshipStudents perceptions and approach1225-May-1513THANK YOU13